Atsumasa Kariyaa,
Tomoaki Yamaguchia,
Tomoya Nobutaa,
Norihiro Tadaa,
Tsuyoshi Miurab and
Akichika Itoh*a
aGifu Pharmaceutical University 1-25-4, Daigaku-nishi, Gifu 501-1196, Japan. E-mail: itoha@gifu-pu.ac.jp
bTokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan
First published on 28th February 2014
The synthesis of β-hydroxy sulfones from alkenes and sodium sulfinates under aerobic oxidative conditions was achieved in the presence of a catalytic amount of molecular iodine. Molecular oxygen in air serves as the terminal oxidant and the catalytic amount of molecular iodine acts as the sulfonyl radical initiator and peroxide reductant.
On the other hand, we have developed various oxidation methods using catalytic iodine sources and molecular oxygen as the terminal oxidant under visible light irradiation.8 Molecular oxygen is photosynthesized by plants and is an effective oxidant with atom efficiency higher than that of other oxidants such as toxic heavy metals and complex organic reagents. Through our study of aerobic photo-oxidation with iodine sources, we discovered the oxysulfonylation of alkenes. During the course of our present study, Lei and co-workers reported impressive results for the aerobic oxysulfonylation of alkenes using sulfinic acids.9 However, this reaction requires sulfinic acids, which are air sensitive, as well as a stoichiometric amount of triphenylphosphine as the reductant. Herein, we report the synthesis of β-hydroxy sulfones from alkenes and sodium sulfinates, which are readily available and easily handled, using a catalytic amount of molecular iodine and molecular oxygen from air (Scheme 1).
![]() | ||
Scheme 1 Aerobic oxidative synthesis of β-hydroxy sulfones from alkenes using a catalytic amount of molecular iodine. |
Table 1 shows the results of the optimization of the reaction conditions. Styrene (1a) was chosen as the test substrate and reacted with sodium benzenesulfinate (2a) in the model reaction. When iodine was used as the catalyst and acetonitrile as the solvent under visible light irradiation conditions, hydroxy sulfone (3aa) was obtained in low yield (entry 1). Addition of protic acids, such as acetic acid, p-toluenesulfonic acid, and trifluoroacetic acid, provided increased yields of 3aa (entries 2–6). Thus, the solvent and iodine source were investigated using acetic acid as a cosolvent (entries 7–19), and the highest yield of 3aa was obtained using MeCN/AcOH (1 mL/0.4 mL) as the solvent and I2 as the catalyst (entry 19). Next, the necessity of visible light irradiation was examined, and the reaction was found to be depressed in the dark (entry 20). On the other hand, the reaction proceeded in high yield, even without positive irradiation of visible light (entry 21). In addition, without an iodine source and molecular oxygen, lower yields were obtained (entries 22 and 23).
Entry | Iodine source | Additive | Solvent (mL) | 3aab (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (2 equiv.), iodine source (0.1 equiv.) and additive (1 equiv.) in solvent was stirred and irradiated externally with a fluorescent lamp for 20 h.b 1H NMR yields. Number in parenthesis is isolated yield.c The reaction was carried out in the dark.d The reaction was carried out without positive irradiation from fluorescent lamp.e The reaction was carried out under argon. | ||||
1 | I2 | — | MeCN (1) | 13 |
2 | I2 | Et3N | MeCN (1) | 0 |
3 | I2 | K2CO3 | MeCN (1) | 2 |
4 | I2 | AcOH | MeCN (1) | 38 |
5 | I2 | TsOH·H2O | MeCN (1) | 59 |
6 | I2 | TFA | MeCN (1) | 66 |
7 | I2 | — | Hexane/AcOH (1/0.25) | 60 |
8 | I2 | — | CHCl3/AcOH (1/0.25) | 70 |
9 | I2 | — | EtOAc/AcOH (1/0.25) | 72 |
10 | I2 | — | THF/AcOH (1/0.25) | 77 |
11 | I2 | — | MeOH/AcOH (1/0.25) | 79 |
12 | I2 | — | AcOH (1.25) | 56 |
13 | I2 | — | MeCN/AcOH (1/0.25) | 85 |
14 | NIS | — | MeCN/AcOH (1/0.25) | 65 |
15 | Nal | — | MeCN/AcOH (1/0.25) | 70 |
16 | Mgl2 | — | MeCN/AcOH (1/0.25) | 60 |
17 | Cal2 | — | MeCN/AcOH (1/0.25) | 74 |
18 | Cl4 | — | MeCN/AcOH (1/0.25) | 60 |
19 | I2 | — | MeCN/AcOH (1/0.4) | 91 |
20c | I2 | — | MeCN/AcOH (1/0.4) | 67 |
21d | I2 | — | MeCN/AcOH (1/0.4) | 88 (93) |
22d | — | — | MeCN/AcOH (1/0.4) | 0 |
23d,e | I2 | — | MeCN/AcOH (1/0.4) | 37 |
Next, the scope and limitations of the reaction of various alkenes (1) and aryl sulfinates (2) under the optimized reaction conditions were investigated, and the results are presented in Table 2. In general, β-hydroxy sulfones were obtained in good to high yields, regardless of the electron-donating or -withdrawing group on the aromatic ring of the styrene substrate (entries 1–7). In addition, a gram-scale reaction was carried out under the optimized conditions, and the desired product was obtained in good yield (entry 1). A longer reaction time was required for the reaction of 4-methoxystyrene (1 g) because light absorption was interrupted by 3ga, which is less soluble in the solvent (entry 7). Furthermore, sterically hindered o-methylstyrene and a disubstituted styrene were good substrates (entries 8 and 9) for the reaction. On the other hand, cyclohexene was a poor substrate, and trans-(2-iodocyclohexyl)sulfonylbenzene was obtained in just 22% yield (entry 10). Finally, sulfinates other than sodium benzenesulfinate, including sodium 4-methylbenzenesulfinate and sodium 4-chlorobenzenesulfinate, were suitable and provided the desired products in high yields (entries 11 and 12).
Entry | Product | Yieldb (%) | Entry | Product | Yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2 (2 equiv.), and I2 (0.1 equiv.) in MeCN/AcOH (1 mL/0.4 mL) was stirred for 20 h.b Isolated yields.c Styrene (1a: 10 mmol, 1.04 g), PhSO2Na (2a: 2 equiv.), I2 (0.1 equiv.), MeCN/AcOH (30 mL/14 mL) was stirred for 72 h.d The reaction was carried out for 72 h.e The reaction was carried out for 48 h.f trans-(2-Iodocyclohexyl)sulfonylbenzene (22%) was obtained. | |||||
1 | ![]() |
93 (79)c | 7 | ![]() |
61d |
2 | ![]() |
80 | 8 | ![]() |
94 |
3 | ![]() |
72 | 9 | ![]() |
79e |
4 | ![]() |
87 | 10 | ![]() |
0f |
5 | ![]() |
86 | 11 | ![]() |
91 |
6 | ![]() |
93 | 12 | ![]() |
93 |
To resolve the reaction mechanism, several control experiments were then examined. Without quenching with aq. Na2S2O3, β-hydroxy sulfone 3aa was detected in 72% yield, and no β-hydroperoxysulfone 3aa′ was detected in the 1H NMR spectrum (Scheme 2, eqn (1)). When 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine 1-oxyl (TEMPO) was added as a radical scavenger, however, the reaction did not proceed (Scheme 2, eqn (2)). On the other hand, when triethylborane instead of iodine was used as radical initiator, the reaction proceed (Scheme 2, eqn (3)). These results indicating that a radical mechanism is involved. The β-iodo sulfone 4 was eliminated as a possible intermediate when its reaction under the optimized conditions resulted in its recovery (67% yield) and the formation of 3aa and 5 in low yield (Scheme 2, eqn (4)).10
A plausible reaction path for this oxidation, postulated on the basis of all of the above mentioned results, is presented in Scheme 3. A sulfone radical is generated from sodium sulfinate and molecular iodine via sulfonyl iodide 7 upon exposure to light in the presence of acetic acid.10 This sulfone radical adds to the substrate 1 to give benzyl radical species 9, which traps molecular oxygen and is converted to peroxy radical 10 and then hydroperoxide 3′. Hydroperoxide 3′ is subsequently reduced to the β-hydroxy sulfone 3 by an iodide species, such as sodium iodide, and the hypoiodite is regenerated. Hypoiodite also serves as sulfone radical initiator via sulfonyl iodide 7.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: General procedure: a solution of styrene (1a, 0.3 mmol), sodium benzenesulfinate (2a, 2 equiv.) and iodine (0.1 equiv.) in MeCN/AcOH (1 mL/0.4 mL) in a pyrex test tube was stirred under air for 20 h. The reaction mixture was washed with aq. Na2S2O3 and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product by a silica gel column (hexane![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 |