Paolo
Falcaro
*a,
Raffaele
Ricco
a,
Cara M.
Doherty
a,
Kang
Liang
b,
Anita J.
Hill
b and
Mark J.
Styles
b
aCSIRO Materials Science and Engineering, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. E-mail: Paolo.Falcaro@csiro.au; Tel: +61 3 9545 2968
bCSIRO Process Science and Engineering, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
First published on 7th May 2014
Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) offer the highest surface areas per gram of any known material. As such, they epitomise resource productivity in uses where specific surface area is critical, such as adsorption, storage, filtration and catalysis. However, the ability to control the position of MOFs is also crucial for their use in devices for applications such as sensing, delivery, sequestration, molecular transport, electronics, energy production, optics, bioreactors and catalysis. In this review we present the current technologies that enable the precise positioning of MOFs onto different platforms. Methods for permanent localisation, dynamic localisation, and spatial control of functional materials within MOF crystals are described. Finally, examples of devices in which the control of MOF position and functionalisation will play a major technological role are presented.
Raffaele Ricco received his PhD in molecular sciences at the University of Padova in 2008. From 2008 to 2012 he worked in a nanotechnology company developing dye loaded silica nanoparticles. From 2012 he is a Postdoctoral Fellow in Paolo's group at CSIRO; his main research interest is the application of magnetic framework composites. |
Cara Doherty obtained her PhD in Physical Chemistry from the University of Melbourne in 2009 where she developed porous materials for use in high power lithium ion batteries. She is currently a research scientist at CSIRO and an ARC Discovery Early Career Research Fellow where she investigates porous materials in dynamic systems. |
Kang Liang received his PhD degree from the University of Melbourne under the supervision of Prof. Frank Caruso, developing nanoengineered particles for biomedical applications. He is currently a Postdoctoral Fellow in Paolo's group at CSIRO, where he is utilizing his expertise in developing functional porous materials for bio-related applications. |
Anita Hill obtained her PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Duke University. She is the Group Executive for Manufacturing, Materials and Minerals at CSIRO. She is a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering and an Office of the Chief Executive Science Leader at CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering. |
Mark Styles completed his PhD in mechanical engineering jointly at the University of Melbourne and CSIRO in 2012. He is currently a Postdoctoral Fellow at CSIRO, where he applies his skills in mechanical engineering and X-ray characterisation techniques to several projects, including investigating precipitation hardening processes in structural alloys and MOF growth and positioning technologies. |
The crucial steps involved in controlling the location of functional materials are process optimization (making the desired functional material), engineering (control the geometry of the material and tune the properties for the desired application), and integration into a useful platform (connection with other materials and components). In this context, many opportunities for developing new, high-performance technologies originate from the ability to fabricate new types of microstructures or to recreate existing structures in down-sized versions.3 This process can be identified as miniaturisation. Progress in device miniaturisation is strongly linked to functional materials and suitable protocols for controlling their location.4
The success of the microelectronics industry has provided a strong driving force for the development of new fabrication techniques at the micro- and nano-scale. These micro- and nano-fabrication techniques, combined with other kinds of advanced materials, have since shown that novel optical, chemical, magnetic, mechanical, medical and diagnostic devices can be fabricated with superior performance compared to their macro counterparts,5 with applications ranging from sensing to microbiology. The technological and industrial advantages that can be achieved by device miniaturisation highlight the importance of combining improved fabrication techniques with materials with exceptional properties.
Despite the valuable attributes of porous materials,6 methods for controlling the location of individual crystals and coatings with specifically designed pore sizes, arrangement and distribution are still in their infancy.7 Although several studies have shown the potential of devices employing highly porous crystals, more research is required to fully understand the potential and the limitations of these materials, both for scientific reasons and for future technological applications. Among the different porous materials, metal organic frameworks (MOFs), also called Porous Coordination Polymers (PCPs), are a class of ultra-porous materials with exceptionally high accessible surface area due to the framework produced by the inorganic nodes coordinated by organic bridging ligands.8,9 These surface areas can range from 1000 to 10000 m2 g−1, thus exceeding other porous materials such as mesoporous based oxides, zeolites and carbons.10 As a result, MOFs have shown remarkable capabilities in application areas where the accessible surface area is a critical feature, such as in gas storage,11,12 separation13 and catalysis.14 However, more recently, they have been shown to hold much promise for a variety of other applications including sensing,15 microelectronics,16,17 optics,18–20 micro-motors,21 molecular rotors,22 pollutant sequestration,23–25 energy production,26,27 bioreactors,24 diagnostics and controlled drug release.28,29 Importantly, these are all fields that could benefit from advanced miniaturisation processes.
MOF crystals are produced by a process of self-assembly, which allows (under the proper conditions) for the spontaneous formation of ordered lattices. This bottom-up approach enables the growth of beautiful hybrid crystals with complex supramolecular architectures. However, achieving control over the spatial localisation of the self-assembly sites is a challenging task,30 which remains a major scientific goal for the development of MOF-based technology.7 To address this issue, a number of different approaches have been proposed to control the position of these ultra-porous crystals. These strategies range from the patient and carefully controlled growth of MOF lattices on chemically functionalised patterns by providing the framework components separately,31 to the use of a magnetic field to quickly and easily manipulate the location of MOF crystals with embedded magnetic particles.32 In this review, we critically present the different approaches for achieving spatial control over the location of MOF materials, which is a crucial step in enabling the fabrication of MOF-based devices.7,33,34
To highlight the significance of this field, we have analysed the publication trend regarding Metal Organic Frameworks in the 2003–2013 period.35 As shown in Fig. 1, from 2003 to 2013, an increasing number of articles regarding MOFs have been published in peer-reviewed journals. In the same timeframe, the records related to device fabrication have followed a similar trend.
Fig. 1 Evolution of the cumulative number of papers related to metal organic frameworks (MOFs, orange columns and left Y-axis, ×100), and to MOFs and device fabrication (blue columns and right Y-axis, ×100), in the 2003–2013 period. Source: ISI Web of Science.35 |
Here we present a classification based on the permanent localisation of MOFs by considering bottom-up and top-down approaches. We then discuss the dynamic localisation of MOF particles and the progress on positioning functional materials within MOFs. Finally we describe the progress in MOF-based device fabrication for the benefit of current and future applications.
Although MOFs are always prepared by self-assembly, which is considered a bottom-up approach, we will refer to the patterning method used in order to classify a fabrication protocol as being either a bottom-up or a top-down protocol. In particular, we define bottom-up approaches as any protocol that achieves spatial control of MOFs via the growth of the porous crystals in pre-identified locations. Under ideal conditions the MOF would form only in controlled areas. Conversely, if the spatial control of MOFs is achieved by either removing or transferring pre-existing MOF crystals (e.g. powders or films), such that a smaller amount of MOF-based material is located in the final pattern, then we consider that protocol as being a top-down method (Fig. 3).
Classification | Patterning approach | MOF | Pattern thicknessa | Pattern resolution/gap sizea | Preferential orientation | Year | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a If not explicitly written in the paper, the dimensions of the MOF crystals and/or the pattern resolution, if possible, are deducted from the images in the original manuscripts and it should be considered as an indication only. b Several microns can be achieved in porous systems such as inverse opals. | |||||||
Bottom-up | |||||||
Surface functionalisation | LPE | ZIF-8 | ∼700 nm | ∼2 μm | [001] | 2012 | 77 |
AFM | HKUST-1 | ∼60 nm | ∼15 μm | [111] | 2013 | 78 | |
Gel-layer | NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) | 40–550 nm | N/A | [001] | 2010 | 49 | |
LPE | ZIF-9 | N/A | mm range | N/A | 2013 | 79 | |
LPE | Cu2(ndc)2(dabco) | N/A | μm range | [001] | 2011 | 84 | |
Electrochemical deposition | Anodic deposition | HKUST-1 | 1 to 20 μm | ∼100 μm | N/A | 2009 | 44 |
Precision milling and anodic deposition | HKUST-1 | 5 to 15 μm | mm range | N/A | 2013 | 100 | |
Galvanic displacement | HKUST-1 | N/A | ∼20 μm | N/A | 2010 | 101 | |
Nucleating agents | Heterogeneous seeding with lithography | MOF-5 | N/A | ∼5 μm | N/A | 2011 | 125 |
Contact printing | EISA combined with μCP | HKUST-1 | N/A | μm range | [111]HKUST-1 | 2010 | 102 |
MOF-5 | |||||||
MIMIC | Zn-[4,4′-di(4-pyridyl)cyanostilbene] | 2 μm | μm range | N/A | 2010 | 136 | |
Pen-type lithography | HKUST-1 | N/A | μm range | [111] | 2011 | 137 | |
Pen-type lithography | HKUST-1 | <1 μm | μm range | N/A | 2011 | 139 | |
Pen-type lithography | HKUST-1, Cd3[Co(CN)6]2, Zn3[Co(CN)6]2, Mn3[Co(CN)6]2, and Ag3[Co(CN)6] | N/A | μm range | N/A | 2013 | 140 | |
μCP (click printing) | MOF-5 | ∼40 nm | μm range | N/A | 2011 | 141 | |
Microfluidics | Microfluidics | HKUST-1 | N/A | μm range | [111] | 2012 | 144 |
Microfluidics with LbL | HKUST-1 | ∼550 nm | μm range | N/A | 2013 | 145 | |
Microfluidics | HKUST-1 spheres | Diameter ∼1–2 μm | ∼ 400 μm | N/A | 2011 | 152 | |
Conversion from ceramics | Pseudomorphic replication mechanism | [Al(OH)(ndc)]n | 0.2–1 μmb | 200 nm | N/A | 2012 | 170 |
Combined mechanisms | HKUST-1 | N/A | 10 μm | N/A | 2014 | 172 | |
N/A | ZIF-8 | ∼1–5 μm | 15 μm | N/A | 2013 | 173 | |
Ink-jet printing and spray coating | Ink-jet printing | HKUST-1 | ∼6 μm | μm range | [111] | 2013 | 184 |
LbL spray coating | HKUST-1 | ∼1 μm | μm range | [111] | 2011 | 185 | |
Top-down | |||||||
Photolithography | Deep X-ray lithography | ZIF-9 | 5 μm | 25 μm | N/A | 2012 | 189 |
UV lithography | ZIF-8 | 200 nm | μm range | [100] | 2012 | 37 | |
UV lithography & imprinting | NH2-MIL-53(Al), ZIF-67(Co(Im)2), and ZIF-8 | N/A | 5 μm | N/A | 2013 | 24 |
Fig. 4 Surface functionalisation by microcontact printing (μCP). (a–c) A lithographed stamp is inked with solution containing the functional units. (d–f) The solution is then transferred to the substrate by placing the stamp in contact with the substrate. (g and h) The solvent is then allowed to evaporate, producing the self-assembled monolayer (SAM). Video animation provided as ESI.† |
Fig. 5 (a–j) Schematic of the growth of MOFs on a patterned SAM surface via the LPE process. The patterned SAM substrate is placed in a solution containing both metal precursor and organic linker, resulting in the controlled formation of MOF crystals on the SAM pattern. (k–t) Schematic of LbL growth of MOFs on patterned SAM surface. In this case, the SAM functionalised substrate is alternately placed in the metal precursor and organic linker solutions, with washing steps in between. Video animations provided as ESI.† |
Fischer's group also developed various MOF films of HKUST-1 (Cu3(BTC)2, H3BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid) and Zn2(BDC)2(dabco) [dabco = 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane] on different SAM functionalised substrates (alumina and silica) and were able to observe preferential orientation of crystal growth.52,63,64 Bein's group simultaneously was able to tune the crystal orientation of the MOF growth by changing the functionality of the SAM layer.65–67 They found that the MOF films grown on the –COOH functionalised SAM were oriented in the [100] direction, whereas the MOFs grown on the –OH SAM were aligned along the [111] direction. Thin films grown on the methyl functionalised SAM were also found to be much less oriented.65
Additional control over MOF crystal growth orientation was achieved through the development of the LbL technique, in which the SAM functionalised substrate was alternately placed in the metal precursor and organic linker solutions with washing steps in between.40,68–71 Cobo and Molnár et al., simultaneously developed a multilayer sequential assembly to form 3D coordination polymers [Fe-(pyrazine){M(CN)4}] (M = Ni, Pd, or Pt) that feature spin crossover, making them ideal materials for memory storage devices at room temperature.68,69 The LbL technique produces ultrathin MOF films (termed SURMOF for surface anchored MOFs)72–74 where the MOF crystals were preferentially oriented in the out-of-plane direction. The films are nanometres thick and, due to the precision afforded by the step-wise building process (Fig. 5k–t), the thickness of each film can be tailored by adjusting the number of layers prepared.38 The resulting LbL films feature very smooth surfaces with roughness in the order of only a few molecules.38
Fig. 6 SEM images of ZIF-8 crystals grown by LPE on gold substrates patterned with SAM. (a) ZIF-8 dots grown on ODT and MHA background. (b) ZIF-8 grown in methanolic solution to form a negative pattern. (c) Single ZIF-8 crystals grown on ODT dots and MHA background. (d) ZIF-8 grown on MHA dots and 4-methylbenzenthiol background. (e) ZIF-8 grown on MHA dots with ODT background using a platinum substrate. Insets show magnified images of the dots. Scale bars are 10 μm for a, b, d, e and 4 μm for c.77 |
An alternative method of patterning the SAM layer is via nanografting or nanoshaving, which is a lithographic protocol that uses scanning probe microscopy techniques such as atomic force microscopy (AFM) to laterally pattern with resolutions of several nanometers.78 Nanografting of the SAM layer involves cleaving the bond between the Au substrate and the thiolate species using the AFM tip. This is typically performed in an organothiol containing solution. Ladnorg et al. were able to selectively grow the SURMOF HKUST-1 via the LbL technique on nanografted thiol-based SAM surfaces.78
A number of alternative methods for preparing thin MOF films and patterns on functionalised surfaces have emerged in the last few years. Bein's group developed a novel approach employing a gel layer over the functionalised SAM which contains the metal salt precursor (Fig. 7).49 This is then covered by a concentrated linker solution which diffuses through the gel, forming a highly oriented MOF film on the –COOH-functionalised SAM. The method allows for concentrated reactants to be used, and produces homogeneous films of NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) (Fe3OCl(aBDC)3, H2aBDC = 2-aminoterephthalic acid) MOFs with excellent crystal orientation. The thickness was readily controlled by altering the concentration of the Fe precursor in the gel layer.
Fig. 7 Schematic of the gel-layer approach where a SAM-functionalised gold substrate is coated with the metal salt gel precursor (a) and then covered in a solution of the organic MOF linker (b). Over time the linker precursor diffuses through the gel to form an oriented MOF crystal (c–e). SEM of NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) MOF film formed from the gel layer (f).49 Video animation provided as ESI.† |
Alternative methods of functionalising surfaces have also been employed to form MOF films on different substrates. Dimitrakakis et al., demonstrated the patterning ability of a ZIF-9 (Co(bIm)2, HbIm = benzimidazole) film using a plasma polymer coating technique which selectively alters the surface chemistry of a PTFE substrate.79 Different polymers will either promote MOF growth (DGpp = diglyme-based plasma polymer), or inhibit MOF growth (AApp = allylamine-based plasma polymer) via a standard solvothermal mechanism. The highly oxygenated DGpp polymer allows the metal cations to coordinate with the hydroxyl and carbonyl groups, whereas the amino groups in the AApp polymer prevent the metal cations from coordinating to the surface. Another alternative to SAM functionalisation is the protocol proposed by Kida et al.80 These authors formed ZIF-8 films in an aqueous system using 3-(2-imidazolin-1-yl)propyltriethoxysilane to functionalise the glass substrate surface to which the MOF films were grown using the general solvothermal growth technique.80
Fig. 8 Schematic demonstrating the advantage of the LbL technique to form MOF films that are not interpenetrated (right), unlike the conventional solvothermal bulk synthesis (left).72 |
The same group was also able to demonstrate the use of LbL to form isoreticular MOFs (IRMOFs) with 3 × 3 nm channels82 and layered MOF-2 (Zn2(BDC)2(H2O)2) and its copper analogue Cu2(BDC)2(H2O)2 with P4 symmetry which had not been obtained via solvothermal methods, as other monoclinic unit cells were preferentially formed due to interlayer interactions of the solvent molecules.83 The perpendicular orientation of the 2D metal-bdc planes from the surface was achieved due to the anchoring of the paddle wheel units to the COOH-terminated 16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid SAM layer.
LbL films also provide more control over the selective functionalisation or modification of MOFs than the conventional solvothermal synthesis.84–86 Due to the step-wise process of LbL, the selective modification of the external surface of the MOF films can be performed. Liu et al. were able to functionalise an amino monolayer onto Cu2(ndc)2(dabco) [H2ndc = 1,4-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid] MOF using a pyridine-terminated SAM on an Au substrate.84 The amino functionalisation was confirmed via the labelling of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) as it reacts covalently with the amine and can be readily detected from its fluorescent properties. Bein's group was able to confirm that the amino functionalisation within their LPE formed NH2-MIL-88B(Fe), featuring a flexible framework structure, had a significantly higher ethanol uptake than the unfunctionalised MOFs, using a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) and in situ XRD analysis.85 This example highlights the influence of the surface functionalisation technique on controlling selective host–guest interactions for chemical sensing applications.
Some limitations are evident with MOF films prepared using SAMs. The long synthesis time is a significant consideration due to the number of steps required to build up the desired film thickness. The SAM layers also carry their own limitations as they are inherently thermally and chemically sensitive, and therefore may not be compatible with the MOF formation requirements including pH levels, temperatures, solvents or atmospheres.7 No ideal synthesis technique has been established which can be employed to make all MOF thin films and patterns.87 Each specific MOF has its own unique chemistry and consequent synthesis conditions, resulting in continued research in the field of MOF film fabrication.
Anchoring the MOF films and patterns to a substrate using the SAM can also restrict the flexibility of some MOFs. Bein's group demonstrated that the flexible NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) MOF when grown via LPE only showed structural changes in the [001] direction upon sorption of water, whereas the bulk crystals showed structural changes in all directions.85 This should be considered when using MOF films, as the restricted flexibility may prevent access to the MOF's porous structure.
One limitation to the LPE MOF formation method is the lack of control in the crystal orientation along the direction parallel to the substrate (in-plane). Interesting results are achieved in direction normal to the substrate (out-of-plane) with LPE and LbL; however, the Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) method to prepare 2D MOF arrays is required.42,88–91 The combination of LB with LbL shows promising results for formation of MOF films with controlled crystal orientation.
Conversely, in cathodic deposition, the substrate to be coated acts as the cathode of the cell and is suspended in a solution that already contains both the metal ions and bridging ligands. Li and Dincă45 first reported how the reduction of Zn2+ ions and the deprotonation of H2BDC induced by the formation of a localised concentration of OH− ions near the cathode of such a cell, could be used to synthesise MOF-598 coatings on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) electrodes. In a recent study, the same authors have demonstrated how mixed, as well as bilayer, coatings of MOF-5 and (Et3NH)2Zn3(BDC)499 can also be synthesised using cathodic deposition.46 This shows the potential of cathodic deposition for the fabrication of multi-MOF-based systems.
Fig. 9 (a–d) Schematic of the electrochemical method proposed by Ameloot et al.44 for depositing HKUST-1 on copper substrates. (a) A copper pattern (orange) is produced using standard lithographic techniques, and connected as the anode in an electrochemical cell. (b) Voltage is then applied, releasing Cu cations into solution. (c) The ligand (H3BTC) in solution reacts with the metal cations concentrated near the anode surface, growing the MOF crystals (blue). (d) The concentration of the metal precursor remains higher over the uncoated regions of the anode, promoting MOF growth on these areas, resulting in a dense coating. (e) SEM measurements performed on the patterned regions and (f) detail showing the preferential growth of HKUST-1 on metal. Images have been reprinted with permission from Ameloot et al.44 (g–j) Schematic of MOF patterns produced using precision milling combined with electrochemical deposition. (g) A copper substrate is coated with (h) a PEEK layer, and (i) a meandering channel is cut via a precision milling process. (j) Electrochemical synthesis is then used to deposit HKUST-1 crystals in the channels. SEM images showing the (k) top and (l) side view of MOF-coated microchannels. SEM images reproduced from Van Assche and Denayer.100 Video animations provided as ESI.† |
Van Assche et al.100 recently described the fabrication of a microseparator device that is also based on anodic deposition of HKUST-1 crystals. In this case, thin (300 μm) copper plates were coated with an adhesive layer (100 μm) of polyether ether ketone (PEEK), through which a meandering channel ∼200 μm deep was cut via a precision milling process (Fig. 9g–l). After a temporary plastic cover was applied to the reverse side, the copper plates were submersed as the anode in an electrochemical cell employing an ethanolic solution containing 35 wt% water, 16 g L−1 H3BTC, and 10 g L−1 of electrolyte (methyl-tributyl-ammonium methyl sulphate). A HKUST-1 film approximately 5 to 15 μm thick was then grown within the channels by applying a voltage of 2.0 V to the plate for 20 minutes. Multiple plates were prepared using this approach, and subsequently stacked within an aluminium housing to form a microseparator, with the PEEK layers acting as gaskets between each plate. The authors used this device to separate n-hexane from a stream containing methanol.
In 2010 Ameloot and co-workers made further progress,101 combining controlled evaporative conditions102 with another anodic deposition process known as galvanic displacement. In this experiment, a glass slide was coated with trimethylsilane groups to create a hydrophobic substrate. Afterwards, an array of Cu micropatches (50 × 50 μm in size) was vapour deposited on top of the hydrophobic substrate using a shadow mask. A solution containing the H3BTC ligand and silver nitrate dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was then spin-coated on top of the patterned substrate. The exposed methyl functionalised areas caused the solution to preferentially wet the regions covered by Cu, allowing the electrochemical reaction to be confined to the 50 × 50 μm areas. Upon heating to 80 °C the Ag ions in solution oxidised the Cu substrate, releasing Cu ions into solution. Interestingly, the deposition of metallic silver occurring during this electrochemical process helped to anchor the 100–200 nm HKUST-1 crystals to the micropatches due to its roughness.101 This work demonstrates that anodic deposition can be used to grow MOFs on isolated metallic patterns without needing to apply an external electric field.
A variety of MOF type membranes have since been developed using the homogeneous seeding and secondary growth method with improved orientation for the use in gas separation including; MMOF [Cu(hfipbb)(H2hfipbb)0.5][(H2hfipbb)4,4′-(hexafluoroisopropylidene)-bis(benzoic acid)],103 ZIF-8,109,110 HKUST-1,111 ZIF-69112 (Zn(nIm)2, H2nIm = 2-nitroimidazole), MOF-5,113 MIL-101(Cr)114 (Cr3OF(BDC)3), MIL-53(Al)115 (Al(OH)(BDC)), MIL-96(Al)116 (Al12O(OH)18(Al2(OH)4)(BTC)6) and NH2-MIL-53(Al) (Al(OH)(aBDC)).117 Yusenko et al. used the LbL deposition technique to seed the membrane support with [Cu2(ndc)2(dabco)] MOF particles on non-functionalised substrates (Al2O3, SiO2, Ta2O5 and Si3N4).87 The seeded supports were then placed in the Cu2(ndc)2(dabco) mother solution for the secondary growth to form a thick MOF layer. Nan et al. used a similar LbL technique to form HKUST-1 membranes on α-alumina supports.118 The HKUST-1 seeds were grown from the initial reaction of the H3BTC carboxyl groups and the hydroxyl groups of the alumina substrate. The substrate was then immersed in a copper acetate solution to form the MOFs. After several cycles, the HKUST seeds were formed and then used in a secondary mother solution to form a full membrane.118
Yoo et al. have used microwave synthesis to directly nucleate the MOF seeds onto a graphitic membrane support.121,122 The heterogeneous nucleation and growth on the graphite supports required no additional surface modification. The microwave-assisted heating at the interface of the support and the MOF precursor solution induces heterogeneous nucleation as this growth method is not favourable under regular solvothermal conditions.
The same authors used the microwave seeding technique to prepare the heteroepitaxial growth of framework structures in which MOF-5 was used as a seed to grow IRMOF-3 (Zn4O(aBDC)3) on a porous alumina support.123 IRMOFs have identical crystal structures and similar unit cell parameters; however, they have different chemical functionalities, making them ideal materials for heterogeneous seeding and for building core–shell type hybrid structures.123,124
Koh et al. simultaneously prepared core–shell IRMOF-3/MOF-5 particles using this seeding method. They extended the method further by making multiple alternate layers by growing a third layer (Fig. 10).124
Fig. 10 Microscope images of the core–shell MOFs grown by heterogeneous nucleation. (a) MOF-5 core, IRMOF-3 middle layer and MOF-5 outer layer. (b) IRMOF-3 core, MOF-5 middle layer and IRMOF-3 outer layer. Scale bar is 200 μm.124 |
Fig. 11 (a and b) Schematics of ceramic particles used for the nucleation of MOF-5 particles. (c) A ceramic particle suspension was positioned on the patterned substrate. (d) A standard MOF-5 growing medium is introduced for the MOF formation within the membrane holes. SEM images of (e) ceramic particles located in a hole of the substrate (scale bar, 10 μm), and (f) MOF-5 crystals growing within each one of the lithographed holes (scale bar, 50 μm).125 Video animation provided as ESI.† |
Falcaro et al. extended this technique to other heterogeneous seeds in order to demonstrate the versatility of the approach.126,127 Carboxy- and amino-functionalised silica nanoparticles were used for the fast nucleation of mono-dispersed MOF-5 crystals. Using these seeds, the nucleation and growth of MOF-5 is up to 10 times faster than the regular solvothermal methods used. By seeding a silicon substrate with the silica nanoparticles, MOF-5 films were successfully grown without any surface modification of the substrate.126,127 Recently, Liu et al. reported a seeding technique using microsized zeolite crystals (MOR, Y and ZSM-5) as nucleating seeds for the synthesis of MIL-101(Cr), MIL-100(Cr) (Cr3OF(BTC)2), and MIL-53(Fe) (Fe(OH)(BDC)). As with Falcaro's technique, the presence of the zeolites shortened the crystallisation time by up to 75%.128
Ameloot et al.102 demonstrated that the precursor solution for HKUST-1 could be stabilised at room temperature by replacing the ethanol–water solvent with DMSO. Compared to water or ethanol, DMSO has a strong affinity towards the metal ions in solution and also allows for the formation of hydrogen bonded solvate structures with the H3BTC ligand. These solute–solvent interactions stabilise the solution, preventing nucleation of the MOF crystals at room temperature. The authors went on to demonstrate that the stabilizing effect is reversible, and that well-formed HKUST-1 crystals could be produced by prolonged heating of the solution, and more interestingly from a patterning perspective, by evaporating the solvent under controlled conditions.
Fig. 12 (a–d) Schematic showing the formation of HKUST-1 crystals within confined volumes, using μCP combined with controlled solvent evaporation. (a and b) A lithographed stamp is wet with a stable precursor solution and placed in contact with the substrate. (c and d) The stamp is left in contact with the substrate while the solvent evaporates, producing well-defined MOF crystals. (e) SEM image of the HKUST-1 crystal patterns obtained (scale bar 1 mm). Reproduced with permission from Ameloot et al.102 (f–i) Schematic showing the coordination polymer line patterns obtained using the MIMIC process. (f) A dry stamp is placed in contact with the substrate. (g and h) a droplet of solution is dispensed at the edge of the stamp, filling the channels by capillary forces. (i) The solvent is allowed to evaporate, leaving a pattern which follows the contours of the stamp. (j) FESEM image of coordination polymer line patterns (scale bar 10 μm). Reproduced with permission from You et al.136 (k–o) Schematic of the pen-type lithography method for fabricating single crystal MOF arrays. (l) Droplets are dispensed by bringing a microfluidic pen into contact with a substrate. (m and n) MOF crystals are then grown by controlled evaporation of the solvent. (h) FESEM image of an array of HKUST-1 single crystals formed on a gold substrate prepared with CH3-terminated functional groups. Scale bar 5 μm and inset 500 nm. Reproduced with permission from Carbonell et al.137 Video animations provided as ESI.† |
An interesting feature of coordination polymers is that they can be reversibly de-polymerised by dissolving them in a strong coordination solvent, and then re-polymerised back into their initial macrostructure by controlled removal of the solvent. You et al.136 showed that this reversible de-polymerisation behaviour of coordination polymers could be combined with a standard lithographic method known as micromolding in capillaries (MIMIC138) to produce well-defined patterns. In this process, a dry PDMS stamp featuring lithographed micro-channels is pressed against the substrate to be patterned (Fig. 12f). The precursor solution, in this case zinc coordinated 4,4′-di(4-pyridyl)cyanostilbene dissolved in an excess of pyridine, is then deposited at the edge of the stamp, causing the solution to be sucked into the micro-channels by capillary forces (Fig. 12g and h). The solvent is then removed, either by evaporation or by absorption into the stamp, depositing the desired material onto the substrate (Fig. 12i). Finally, once the crystallisation process is completed, the stamp can be removed from the substrate to reveal the pattern (Fig. 12j). The authors demonstrated that bi-dimensional micro-arrangements of highly luminescent reticular superstructures could be fabricated on a silica substrate using this approach. The authors observed that the polymer microstructures reproduced the geometry of the micro-channels with high precision and that shrinkage of the pattern was minimal.
When the process of evaporation induced growth is combined with other free-form methods for depositing individual droplets on substrates, such as pen-type nanolithography, highly accurate and customisable MOF patterns can be achieved.137,139,140 This approach provides control over the volume of precursor solution to be deposited at a specified location, which allows the conditions necessary for producing single MOF crystals of a particular size to be quickly investigated and selected for use in specific applications. Although precise droplet deposition can be achieved by functionalising the tip of a conventional atomic force microscope (AFM),139 dedicated commercial instruments are now available that allow control over both the dispensing and mixing of nano to femtolitre droplets.137,140 Once the droplets of the MOF precursor solution are located on the surface of the substrate, controlled evaporation of the solvent can then be used to synthesise the MOF crystals (Fig. 12k–o).
Carbonell et al.137 first reported the use of pen-type nanolithography for patterning MOF crystals, using a stable precursor solution for HKUST-1 employing DMSO as the solvent. The authors found that the contact angle of the droplets is a critical factor in obtaining controlled precipitation of a single MOF crystal per droplet under ambient conditions. If the surface is coated with hydrophobic functional groups such as –CF3 or –CH3, the contact angle is increased and single crystals are obtained. However, if the surface is made hydrophilic by using functional groups, such as –NH3, –COOH or –OH, the solution wets the substrate and multiple small crystals are formed. By controlling the size of the droplets deposited and their contact angle, single HKUST-1 crystals were obtained in the 0.5 to 1.2 μm range. The authors noted that the HKUST-1 crystals grown on the –CH3 and –CF3 functionalised surfaces tended to preferentially orientate along their [111] directions.
Recently Carbonell et al.140 reported further progress in the use of pen-type nanolithography, demonstrating that mixing of femtolitre volumes could be accurately and reproducibly achieved. The authors showed that a microfluidic pen, located in an controlled atmosphere to limit evaporation, could be used to compartmentalize the crystallization of HKUST-1, by introducing a femtolitre droplet of H3BTC in DMSO to another femtolitre droplet of Cu(NO3)2·2.5(H2O) in DMSO that had already been deposited on a SiO2 surface. Crystallization of HKUST-1 was then induced by removing the substrate from the instrument and allowing the DMSO to evaporate under ambient conditions (Fig. 13a–c). The authors also described how this approach could be extended to produce multiplexed arrays of crystalline materials, using four microfluidic pens to deposit and mix precursor solutions for four different Prussian blue analogues (PBAs): (Cd3[Co(CN)6]2, Zn3[Co(CN)6]2, Mn3[Co(CN)6]2, and Ag3[Co(CN)6]) (Fig. 13d–i). The problem of cross-contamination from the microfluidic pen during mixing was solved by introducing a cleaning step, which involved depositing several droplets of solution outside the working area between each mixing operation.
Fig. 13 (a–c) FESEM images of an HKUST-1 crystal array (feature distance = 25 μm), produced using pen-type lithography. (d and e) FESEM images of a multiplexed 4 × 4 array of crystalline PBAs with general formula M3[Co(CN)6]2, where M is Cd(II), Zn(II) and Mn(II), and Ag3[Co(CN)6] (feature distance = 25 μm), illustrating the mixing capabilities of this technique. (f–i) FESEM images of individual deposits of (f) Cd(II)-PBA, (g) Zn(II)-PBA, (h) Mn(II)-PBA, and (i) Ag(I)-PBA nanocrystals (scale bars, 2 μm). Reproduced from Carbonell et al.140 |
Finally, Gassensmith et al.141 have proposed a novel approach based on μCP that can be used to pattern substrates as well as the surfaces of larger crystals. The authors first prepared an azide-terminated SAM on a silicon substrate. This monolayer was then patterned by μCP, using a PDMS stamp loaded with a solution of copper sulphate, ascorbic acid and pentynoic acid, to form repeating rows of carboxylic acid groups exploiting the azide–alkyne Huisgen reaction, which is part of the click chemistry methodology.142 When immersed in a MOF-5 precursor solution (zinc nitrate, H2BDC and DMF), the pentynoic acid pattern provides a nucleation site for MOF growth. Thin films of MOF-5 approximately 40 nm high were shown to grow preferentially on top of the pentynoic acid pattern by leaving the substrate in the solution at 85 °C for 48 h, while negligible MOF growth was observed on the azide coated surfaces. However, much larger crystals (>0.5 mm) could also be grown on the substrate by continued immersion in the precursor solution. Interestingly, when these crystals were gently removed from the substrate, the surface which had been in contact with the pentynoic acid was shown to be embossed with a replica of the printed pattern. This work demonstrates the possibility of using μCP SAMs as a form of stamp for patterning the surfaces of crystals with nano-scale features.
Witters et al.144 have described an implementation of digital microfluidics which enables large arrays of MOF crystals to be rapidly and accurately printed. Their methodology consists of a modular two-plate digital microfluidic device in which the bottom plate of the assembly, containing the electronics, is dedicated to the transport of micro- to nanolitre-sized ‘mother droplets’. Droplet actuation is achieved by the electrowetting-on-dielectric principle, in which an imbalance in the interfacial tension between a liquid droplet and an electrode coated with a dielectric layer is used to propel the droplet. The hydrophilic substrate onto which the MOF crystals are to be printed is coated with a patterned hydrophobic layer (e.g. Teflon AF), forming hydrophilic-in-hydrophobic micropatches, and constitutes the top plate of the device. Mother droplets are generated on-chip from a fluid reservoir, and then transported over these micropatches, dispensing femtolitre droplets into the hydrophilic micropatches in the process, as shown in Fig. 14.
Fig. 14 (a and b) Schematic of the digital microfluidic chip implemented by Witters et al.144 for printing of MOF crystals (scale = 700 μm). Mother droplets are transported over arrays of hydrophilic-in-hydrophobic micropatches, dispensing femtolitre droplets of solution in the process. (c) Schematic illustrating two different paths that could be taken by a mother droplet by applying different actuation sequences to the electrodes. (d) Sequence of images from a movie showing how a mother droplet is dispensed from a fluid reservoir onto a path made from actuation electrodes (scale = 1.4 mm). (e–g) SEM images of single HKUST-1 crystal arrays produced by controlled evaporation. The square-shaped micropatches (20 μm × 20 μm) are ITO in a hydrophobic Teflon-AF matrix, over which a mother droplet has passed. Highly monodisperse single crystals can be observed after controlled evaporation of the solution. Scale bars represent 40 μm (e), 20 μm (f), and 10 μm (g). Reproduced with permission from Witters et al.144 |
By removing the top plate after printing and controlling the evaporation rate of the solution contained in the micropatches, large grids of single MOF crystals can be grown with high spatial control, high monodispersity and high crystal orientation ([111] direction) (Fig. 14e–g). Furthermore, the size of the MOF crystals was shown to be controlled by the size of the micropatches in which the MOFs are grown.
Witters et al.145 have also demonstrated that this digital microfluidic methodology can be used to deposit thin, dense, polycrystalline films within the micropatches using the LbL technique. In that work, droplets of a metal salt solution, an organic ligand solution, and clean rinsing solvent are repeatedly dispensed from on-chip fluid reservoirs and transported over the micropatches in the top plate by the actuation electrodes in the bottom plate. Using this approach, micropatches with thicknesses of around 550 nm can be grown after an equivalent of 40 LbL cycles.
Using the same methodology Witters et al.146 have recently shown that digital microfluidics can also be used to seed micro arrays with magnetic particles. This was achieved by repeatedly passing a droplet loaded with micron-sized particles over a patterned micro array, using a permanent magnet to attract and trap the particles in the individual wells. When combined with magnetic MOF composites, such as those described by Falcaro et al.,147 this technology could easily be extended to seeding micro arrays with MOF particles.
Microfluidic technology is not restricted to material synthesis; it can also employ localised functional materials directly in order to achieve certain functionality within a miniaturised device (i.e. application area 2). For example, Puigmartí-Luis et al.148 have recently described a continuous flow microfluidic device containing pneumatically actuated clamps that can be used to trap material on top of sensing electrodes. These authors have shown that bundles of silver-tetracyanoquinodimethane (Ag(I)TCNQ) coordination polymer nanowires, produced by interfacial reaction between two laminar flows of precursor solution and trapped using the pneumatic clamps, can be used as an organic memory element in this device. Microfluidic devices employing pneumatically actuated barriers have also been used by authors from the same group to confine and mix sub-nanolitre volumes of solution over sensing electrodes.149 The parallelism of this approach lends itself to screening platforms and multifunctional array fabrication.
Modern continuous flow and droplet-based microfluidic devices offer a very high level of control over fluid dispensing and mixing operations, and hence are well suited to the final application area. For example, these devices can be used to mix and subsequently confine MOF precursor solutions within individual droplets that are suspended in an immiscible fluid (Fig. 15). Solvothermal MOF crystallisation can then be precisely controlled by passing the droplets through a heating stage with a prescribed dwell time.150,151 The advantages of this approach over conventional solvothermal processes include significantly increased reaction kinetics, continuous production, narrow particle size distribution and high efficiency. Novel heterostructures, such as core–shell particles, can also be produced using this technique by merging droplets at different stages of the process.150
Fig. 15 Schematic representation of a continuous flow microfluidic device for producing high quality MOF crystals (top). Optical and SEM micrographs of HKUST-1 crystals obtained via the microfluidic approach after (a) 1, (b) 3, (c) 6, and (d) 12 min of synthesis. Reproduced from Faustini et al.150 |
The morphology of the MOF particles produced using continuous flow microfluidic devices can also be controlled by taking advantage of the interface between different fluids. This is highlighted very well in the article by Ameloot et al.,152 which describes the synthesis of hollow MOF spheres. If the organic and inorganic precursors are dissolved in two different immiscible solvents, the precursors can be made to encounter each other from opposite sides of a liquid–liquid interface, enabling the self-completing interfacial formation of a MOF layer (Fig. 16). Using a simple T-junction, the authors have shown how the surface of droplet can act as a template for growing hollow MOF structures that are interesting candidates for applications such as microreactors.152 Importantly, the precursor solutions do not necessarily have to be immiscible in order to achieve interfacial control. Puigmartí-Luis et al.153 have demonstrated that coordination polymer nanowires can be produced by an interfacial reaction between two precursor solutions using a laminar-flow microfluidic device. This approach is promising for the synthesis of novel 1D MOF structures.154
Fig. 16 (a) Schematic showing the T-junction used by Ameloot et al. to synthesise hollow MOF spheres. Individual droplets of an aqueous metal-ion-containing solution (blue) are suspended within a flowing organic ligand solution (purple) using a tapered capillary positioned within the T-junction. (b) The metal cations encounter the organic linkers at the surface of the droplet, resulting in the localised formation of MOF crystals. (c–f) SEM of the hollow HKUST-1 spheres. (c) The capsules retain their spherical shape upon drying and are highly monodisperse in size (scale bar 500 μm). (d) The hollow interior of the sphere is revealed by creating a hole with a needle (scale bar 25 μm). (e) Detail of the defect-free capsule wall. The gaps between larger crystals are sealed by smaller crystals (scale bar 2 μm). (f) Cross-sectional view of the capsule wall, showing its thin and uniform thickness (scale bar 2 μm).152 |
The first breakthrough was proposed by Zou and co-workers, who used a zinc slice activated with H2O2 to induce the formation of zinc hydroxide.169 The coating was immersed in an aqueous solution of H3BTC. Further treatment in an autoclave at 140 °C for 6 h showed a change in the surface roughness and the formation of needle shape crystals. The film was investigated using XRD revealing a pattern corresponding to that of Zn3(BTC)2. Interestingly, such a film was found to be highly sensitive to, and selective for dimethylamine. Under excitation, this film demonstrated variations in emission spectra depending on the amount of dimethylamine and the solvent used (e.g. water, acetonitrile, ethanol).
Hu and co-workers proposed a reactive seeding approach for the synthesis of MIL-53(Al) framework by direct reaction of the metal precursor with the ceramic support.115 A ceramic α-Al2O3 support was used as the aluminium precursor (instead of Al(NO3)3·9H2O), which reacted with H2BDC under mild hydrothermal conditions to grow a homogeneous MIL-53(Al) MOF film that was subsequently used as a seeding layer. A secondary growth process was carried out using Al(NO3)3·9H2O and H2BDC to form the MIL-53(Al) membrane under hydrothermal conditions at 220 °C for 12 hours. X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies showed that the MOF crystal structure, which was synthesised using a porous alumina membrane as the source of Al, is consistent with the MIL-53(Al) pattern reported in the literature. Later, these authors studied the mechanisms of reactive seeding in detail by employing MIL-96(Al) as a model. A two-step reaction mechanism was proposed. The α-Al2O3 support was shown to firstly react with H2O to produce γ-AlO(OH) under hydrothermal conditions, and then the γ-AlO(OH) interacted with the ligand to form the MIL-96(Al) seed crystals.116
Fig. 17 (a) Schematic illustration of the coordination replication method. (b) Top-view FESEM images of the alumina hexagonal pattern. (c) Top-view FESEM images of the [Al(OH)(ndc)]n replica obtained from (b) after microwave treatment. (d) FESEM images of meso-[Al(OH)(ndc)]n replica obtained from mesoporous aerogel. (e) FESEM images of macro-[Al(OH)(ndc)]n replica obtained from macroporous aerogel. (b and c) scale bars are 1 μm. (d and e) scale bars are 10 μm (1 μm for the inset).170 (f–k) Schematic illustration of the formation of HKUST-1 crystals from patterned copper substrates. (f) The copper substrate is coated by a commercial resist, which is exposed to UV radiation through a photomask with a Cr pattern. (g–i) After washing the remaining photoresist with ethanol, the patterned Cu board is formed. (j) Cu(OH)2 nanotubes are then formed via a treatment with NaOH and (NH4)2S2O8 in water. (k) MOF formation can be obtained by exposing the Cu(OH)2 to the H3BTC ligand. (l and m) SEM images showing the conversion from a Cu pattern into HKUST-1 achieved on a printed electronic circuit board (PCB).172 The light gray parallel lines are made on copper decorated by MOF. The MOF growth occurs only on top of the copper. (n–t) Schematic showing ZIF-8 patterns produced by direct conversion from zinc oxide precursor films. (n–p) A hexagonal ZnO pattern was fabricated using μCP of a sol–gel solution, followed by (q) thermal treatment. (r and s) Finely ground HmIm powder is deposited on top of the ZnO film and heated to melt the ligand, leading to a ZIF-8 formation. SEM of ZIF-8 pattern (scale bars 20 μm, and 1 μm inset).173 Video animations provided as ESI.† |
Majano and co-workers discovered that a commercial slurry of Cu(OH)2 could be easily and quickly transformed into HKUST-1 at room temperature.174 The addition of the slurry into an alcoholic solution of H3BTC induced MOF formation, with a few seconds being enough to visibly detect the change from light blue to deep turquoise. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area was approximately 1500 m2 g−1, and most importantly, DMF was not needed for the preparation of these Cu-based MOFs. Although this work presented a synthesis for powder HKUST-1-, the discovery was adopted for use in the patterning of MOFs by Okada and coworkers.172 The authors used a well established protocol for the conversion of copper metal substrate into Cu(OH)2 nanotubes based on the immersion of the metal into an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide and ammonium persulphate.9 The formation of Cu(OH)2 nanotubes was detected within 30 min of reaction.172 The nanotubes were subsequently transformed into HKUST-1 using the previously discovered DMF-free alcoholic solution with H3BTC. This method has illustrated an alternative to the autoclave and electrochemical methods used to grow HKUST-1 from copper metal.44,176 With this new conversion method, a mesh was decorated with a film of MOFs and the catalytic activity was tested using the Friedländer reaction test to evaluate the MOF catalytic properties.177–179 In this study, established technology for patterning copper for microelectronics applications was translated to the MOF field. Photolithography was used for the fabrication of copper patterns. This photolithographic approach is widely used in electronics for the fabrication of printed circuit board (PCB). The authors showed how HKUST-1 crystals were selectively grown and homogeneously covered the conductive copper strips on a PCB, while the dielectric area on the naked support does not show the presence of any MOF crystals (Fig. 17f–m).
Recently, Majano et al. applied the HKUST-1 conversion process to the Fe3(BTC)2 MOF which crystallised within 5 min at room temperature.180 A mixed Fe2+–Fe3+ layered double hydroxide called “green rust” (GR = Fe2+4Fe3+2(OH)12·SO4·2H2O), was synthesized by mixing NaOH, FeCl2·4H2O, and Na2SO4. Fe-BTC crystals were formed instantly after the addition of H3BTC ligand into the GR solution; this reaction was detected by the colour change from dark green to yellowish brown. However, neither pure Fe(OH)3 nor Fe(OH)2 resulted in the final porous material, indicating a flexible layered structure in the mixed iron hydroxide precursor is necessary for the MOF crystal formation. The obtained Fe3(BTC)2 demonstrated a higher crystallinity and a higher content of accessible Lewis-acid sites compared to the commercial counterpart (Basolite F300), which in turn resulted in a higher catalytic activity for Knoevenagel condensation.
Ameloot and co-workers reported in 2013 a solvent-free approach for synthesizing ZIF-8 thin films and micropatterns by direct conversion from zinc oxide precursor films.173 ZnO films in the 500–1000 nm thickness range were deposited by physical vapour deposition (Radio Frequency magnetron sputtering in vacuum). A hexagonal pattern was fabricated using μCP combined with a sol–gel solution based on zinc acetate, monoethanolamine and 2-propanol. The stamp was inked in the sol–gel solution, the excess solution was removed, and finally the stamp was placed in contact with a preheated substrate. The pattern was thermally treated to induce the formation of ZnO. To induce the MOF formation, finely ground HmIm powder was deposited on top of the ZnO film and heated to melt the ligand. During this process the excess liquid HmIm quickly wetted the complete surface, leading to a homogeneous reaction with the precursor ceramic pattern. Using SEM, well-intergrown crystals up to 2 μm in size were detected after a 5 minute reaction, showing that the approach is fast and effective for the preparation of ZIF-8 films, patterns, and flake-like structures (Fig. 17n–t).
After printing, the pattern can be dried in an oven, allowing thicker layers to be deposited by repeated printing-drying cycles. For example, 8 printing-drying cycles were shown to produce coatings 6 μm thick. The final conversion of the printed material into a MOF coating is achieved by a solvent development step which involves immersing the printed MOF pattern in methanol for 30 minutes to remove the less volatile solvents, namely ethylene glycol. This process produced densely grown, non-orientated crystals that could hardly be distinguished from one another. However, if the solvent development is done slowly with methanol vapour in a desiccator, the nucleation rate is slowed, and well defined crystals can be obtained. The scale and complexity of the MOF patterns and gradients that can be achieved using this process are shown in Fig. 18.
Fig. 18 (a–d) Schematic showing the ink-jet printing process for depositing MOF precursor solutions onto various substrates. (e) HKUST-1 ink solution containing ethylene glycol (f) patterns, letters, and a gradient wedge printed onto PET foil (g) Botticelli's “Venus” (original shown inset) was printed in HKUST-1, demonstrating the ability of this approach to pattern large areas. (h) The resolution of this method was tested by printing an array of lines 200 μm wide. To enhance the contrast, pictures (f), (g), and (h) were taken with black paper as background. Images reproduced from Zhuang et al.184 Video animation provided as ESI.† |
Zhuang et al.184 have also demonstrated the utility of the ink-jet printing method for producing inexpensive and practical gas sensors on textiles. The printed HKUST-1 pattern was shown to rapidly change colour from turquoise to dark blue, yellow, and brown after exposure to NH3, HCl, and H2S vapour respectively, visibly indicating the presence of these noxious molecules, as well as their capture. Applications for such a material include protective textiles for first responders.
Another process that can be used to produce large patterns with a minimum amount of precursor solution is spray coating. Arslan et al.185 first reported the use of a spray coating methodology to automate the LbL40,70 or LPE process for producing highly uniform and orientated MOF films and patterns. In their implementation, the authors initially patterned Au substrates with a SAM of 16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid by μCP. These substrates were then alternately sprayed with a solution containing Cu2(CH3COO)4·H2O (for 10 seconds) and a solution containing H3BTC (for 20 seconds) in order to grow a well orientated HKUST-1 film. Between each step the substrate was rinsed with a spray of ethanol to remove any excess precursor solution. The time taken to deposit a film with 20 full spray cycles was only 30 minutes, compared to the 48 hours required to produce an equivalent film using the conventional LbL process.40 The resulting MOF micropatches are well orientated, uniform and retain the geometry of the microcontact printed SAM. Since the initial publication, the spray method has been used to produce a range of MOF coatings with different crystal structures based on Cu and Zn (Fig. 19).78,82,185,186
Fig. 19 Schematic showing spray coating of HKUST-1 films. A SAM surface patterned by μCP (a) is alternately sprayed (b–d) with a solution containing Cu2(CH3COO)4·H2O (yellow) and a solution containing H3BTC (pink), with a rinsing step in between (blue). This effectively automates the LbL process for producing well orientated HKUST-1 films and patterns (e). (f) AFM image showing the spray coated HKUST-1 pattern. AFM image reproduced from Arslan et al.185 Video animation provided as ESI.† |
An obvious patterning approach which has so far received relatively little attention for MOFs is physical vapour deposition (PVD) and other forms of gas-phase deposition. The advantages of this approach in other material systems are the very high purity and high level of control over thickness that can be achieved, and the ease with which patterns can be obtained using simple masks. However, in the case of MOFs and coordination polymers, the properties of the organic ligands, namely their low vapour pressure and limited thermal stability, make them unsuitable for processes like thermal evaporation. Nonetheless, Fischer et al.187 have recently demonstrated that an advanced form of PVD known as pulsed-laser deposition (PLD) can be used to produce coatings of MOFs which feature relatively high thermal stability. These authors synthesised the dense MOF europium(II) imidazolate188 (3∞[EuIm2], HIm = imidazole) in powder form, which was then pressed into a pellet target for the PLD system. By tuning the parameters of the pulsed laser beam (wavelength, laser power, pulse duration, and repetition rate), the europium imidazolate was evaporated from the pellet and deposited onto a sapphire substrate where it recrystallised with the crystal structure of the original MOF. The MOF coating was shown to retain its distinctive photoluminescent properties, allowing the film to be transparent under visible light and opaque under UV light. The gas phase in the PLD chamber was investigated by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry, revealing that the ablation mechanism is likely to consist of fragments containing both Eu atoms and imidazolate ligands. Although no patterns were reported in this work, the ability to deposit MOF coatings by a PVD-based process represents significant progress.
Fig. 20 Schematic of the photolithography technique. A photoresist (a) is exposed to photons through a shadow mask (b), altering the chemistry of the photoresist (c). In a negative photoresist the exposed region is insoluble in developing solutions (d), while in a positive the masked region is insoluble (e). Video animation provided as ESI.† |
Fig. 21 Schematic illustration of the photolithography and imprinting techniques for the formation of MOF patterns. (a) A pre-hydrolyzed PhTES based solution is drop-cast on silicon wafers, and dried (b). (c) Pre-synthesized MOF powder is spread on the film. (d) The film is heated to soften out, thereby anchoring the MOF particles to the substrate. (e–g) A photo mask positioned on top of the film is exposed to synchrotron X-rays. The unexposed region is etched off, leaving a well-defined pattern with a superficial layer of MOFs.189 (h) A substrate is immersed in MOF precursor solution, forming a MOF film. (i) A photoresist was then spin-coated on top of the MOF film, and (j–k) covered with a shadow mask and exposed to UV-light. (l) The subsequent immersion in a base solution reveals the pattern exposing the MOF film in controlled locations (areas exposed to the UV-light). (m and n) A further etching process removes the exposed MOF film.37 (o and p) A UV lithographed film of photoresist is prepared and pressed (q) onto a pre-prepared MOF film. (r and s) The two films are separated, (t and u) resulting a patterned MOF surface.24 Video animations provided as ESI.† |
Lu et al.37 prepared a thin ZIF-8 film that can be grown without the need for chemical functionalisation of the surface. A substrate (e.g. silicon) was immersed in an alcoholic solution of the Zn precursor and the ligand at room temperature (Zn(NO3)2 and HmIm respectively). Repeating the procedure several times with fresh precursor solution produced a smooth 200 nm thick film. The ZIF-8 film was then spin-coated with a positive photoresist (AZ1815), covered with a chromium mask and exposed to UV-light. The subsequent immersion in a basic solution revealed the pattern exposing the MOF film in controlled locations (i.e. areas exposed to the UV-light). A further etching process with an acid solution removed the exposed ZIF-8. The final step requires the use of a solvent to remove the remaining photoresist covering the MOF pattern. Arrays of patterned squares (11 μm edge) were obtained, confirming that the pattern reproduces the photomask design very closely. A resolution of 500 nm was estimated by SEM observations of the edge of the patterns (Fig. 21n); this feature seems to be related to the etching conditions used. Interestingly, the methodology takes advantage of both the ability to grow a smooth film and the excellent chemical stability of ZIF-8 in aqueous base.196 As a proof of concept, the MOF coatings were used to sense the presence of different vapors and gases including H2, using an optical detection method.
To address the problem of the compatibility of MOFs with the radiation or the patterning process, and to make the process faster, Doherty and co-workers proposed an approach that enables the patterning of almost any type of MOFs.24 In accordance with the focus on improving existing micro-fabrication techniques,155 the proposed protocol makes the patterning process easier, faster and more versatile, thereby potentially enabling rapid progress in the fabrication of MOF-based devices.24 The proposed procedure involves a commercial epoxy-based photoresist (SU-8, negative photoresist) that is treated using a normal photolithography procedure (UV-lamp and a photomask) to fabricate a SU-8 pattern. On a different flat substrate (e.g. silicon or SiO2 microscope slide) loose MOF crystals are evenly dispersed making a continuous coating of separate porous crystals. The patterned SU-8 film is pressed onto the MOF film and heated up to a temperature slightly higher than the glass transition (Tg) of the resist (∼95 °C). Thanks to this imprinting step, the loose MOF crystals are transferred and partially embedded into the SU-8 pattern. Once the SU-8 cools back to room temperature, the MOF crystals are anchored onto the resist, resulting in a well defined patterned surface (Fig. 21o–u). To test the versatility of this protocol for positioning different types of MOFs, NH2-MIL-53(Al), ZIF-67(Co(Im)2), and ZIF-8 were used. Interestingly, the procedure combining UV-lithography and imprinting requires just a few minutes and the properties of the MOFs on the substrate are very similar to the properties of the equivalent MOFs as a powder. Examples were reported for the uptake of 1,2-benzanthracene and Pd cations confirming for patterned MOF films the sequestration capabilities for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metal ions. After the patterning process, the NH2 functionality was retained as proven by the bioconjugation with β-glucosidase enzyme. The bio-processing efficiency was measured, confirming that the enzyme was active in the MOF films, as well as in the transferred MOF patterns.
The combination of MOFs with magnetic nanoparticles leads to a new class of materials called magnetic framework composites (MFCs).32 This is already considered a promising new field in MOF technology; however, the precision that can be achieved with dynamic localisation of MOFs is currently lower than can be achieved with permanent localisation methods. A rough comparison is presented in Table 2. The application of these materials in sensing, drug delivery, pollution control, and catalysis has been recently reviewed.32 An updated list of applications is presented in Table 3. In this section, a survey of the synthetic routes for the production of MFCs is presented, including the preparation of MFCs using a microfluidic approach. The application of MFCs in the fabrication of devices is also reviewed.
Magnetic framework composite | Particle size | MOF thickness | Precision of positioning with a magnet | Preferential orientation | Year | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Fe3O4@SiO2)@HKUST-1 | Fe3O4@SiO2: 30–100 nm | Layer: 20–25 nm | N/A | N/A | 2013 | 218 |
Co@MOF-5 | <50 nm | Cubic: 100 μm | mm range | N/A | 2011 | 203 |
Co@Zn4O(BDC)2.25(NH2BDC)0.75 | <50 nm | Cubic: 50 μm | μm range | N/A | 2013 | 147 |
CoFe2O4 or NiFe2O4@MOF-5 | >5 μm (fiber length) | Cubic: 100 μm | mm range | N/A | 2012 | 23 |
Fe2O3@DUT-4: Al(OH)(ndc) | Fe2O3: 10–20 nm | N/A | mm range | N/A | 2011 | 204 |
Fe3O4@Cu(bpdc) and Cu(bpy) | 200 nm (with NH2)215,221 | N/A | None (used in reaction mixture) | N/A | 2012 | 217 and 223 |
1–4 μm (with COOH)221 | ||||||
Fe3O4@HKUST-1 | Fe3O4 nanorods: 15 nm (d) × 75 nm (l) | Irregular particles: 50–150 nm | mm range | N/A | 2011 | 210 |
Fe3O4@HKUST-1 | N/D | Hollow capsules: 1.7 μm | mm range | N/A | 2013 | 211 |
Fe3O4@ZIF-8 | Fe3O4: 600 nm | Layer: 100 nm | Centimeter in capillary reactor | N/A | 2013 | 216 |
Fe3O4@Zn(bix)(NO3) | Fe3O4: 10 | Spheres: 600 nm | mm range | N/A | 2009 | 214 |
Technique | Material, compound, or device | Application proposed or device outcome | Year | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
MOF films | ||||
Cu(TCPP) | Proton conductivity | 2013 | 322 | |
DA-MOF: Zn(Por)(TCPB) | Light harvesting | 2013 | 50 | |
HKUST-1: Cu3(BTC)2 | VOCs detection | 2011 | 263 | |
QCM-electrodes | 2008 | 278 | ||
Inductive sensing | 2009 | 280 | ||
Capacitive humidity sensing | 2011 | 266 | ||
Piezo-resistive gas sensor | 2008 | 264 | ||
Electrical insulator (low-k) | 2013 | 299 | ||
Electrical conductor | 2014 | 16 | ||
Photovoltaic | 2013 | 307 | ||
Ln(BTC)(H2O) [Ln = Dy3+, Eu3+, Tb3+] | Luminescence | 2010 | 313 | |
MOF-5: Zn4O(BDC)3, MOF-177: Zn3(BTB)2 | Photoconductivity | 2012 | 323 | |
NU-901: Zr6O4(OH)4(Por)3 | Electrochromism | 2013 | 272 | |
ZIF-8 on Si and glass | Gas optical sensor | 2010 | 274 | |
ZIF-8 on Si | Electrical insulator (low-k) | 2013 | 298 | |
Zn3(BTC)2 | Photocatalysis | 2013 | 48 | |
ZnPO-MOF: [Zn2(TCPB)(ZnPor)]n | Catalysis | 2009 | 320 | |
Bottom-up patterning for MOFs | ||||
Surface functionalisation | CAU-1: Al4(OH)2(CH3O)4((NH2)BDC)3@SAM on Au surface | Ethanol sorption via QCM-electrode | 2010 | 67 |
Cu(ADA) bulk and on Au surface | Thin film, patterning and orientation growth | 2011 | 76 | |
Cu2(L2)(dabco) [L = see ref.] membrane on TiO2 and Al2O3 support | CO2 separation | 2012 | 283 | |
Fe(pyrazine){M(CN)4} [M = Ni, Pd, Pt] on Au surfaces | Room temperature spin crossover | 2006 | 68 | |
HKUST-1 on Ag nanoparticles | Localised SPR gas sensor | 2010 | 268 | |
HKUST-1 on microcantilever | Piezoresistive sensor for VOCs | 2013 | 265 | |
HKUST-1 on quartz | Surface acoustic wave sensor for gases | 2012 | 267 | |
HKUST-1@SAM on Au surface | High-throughput spray coating | 2011 | 185 | |
MIL-53(Fe): Fe(OH)(BDC) and MIL-88B(Fe): Fe3O(BDC)3@SAM on Au surfaces | Solvent vapour sorption | 2008 | 66 | |
MOF-5 in GC fused silica capillary | Gas chromatographic separation | 2011 | 270 | |
MOF-5@SAM on SiO2/Si surface | Air exposure effect | 2008 | 64 | |
MOF-74(Ni): Ni3O3(dhBDC)1.5 on Al2O3 | CO2 separation | 2012 | 284 | |
ZIF-8 on ITO surface | Photoluminescence | 2013 | 297 | |
Electrochemical deposition | HKUST-1 on QCM | Humidity sensor | 2009 | 44 |
HKUST-1 on Cu sheet | Microseparator device | 2013 | 100 | |
HKUST-1 on patterned Cu on glass | Patterning and wettability | 2010 | 101 | |
Nucleating agents | DRM/QD@MOF-5 | Thiol sensing | 2011 | 125 |
Pen lithography | HKUST-1 on Si/SiO2 substrates | Combinatorial screening | 2013 | 140 |
Microfluidics | HKUST-1 on chip | Droplet routing | 2012 | 144 |
Fe3O4@ZIF-8 | Catalysis in microfluidics | 2013 | 150 | |
HKUST-1 hollow capsules | Sieving | 2011 | 152 | |
Conversion from ceramics | Zn3(BTC)2 | VOCs detection | 2009 | 169 |
MIL-53(Al) on Al2O3 | Gas permeability | 2010 | 115 | |
Al(OH)(ndc) from Al2O3 architecture | Water–ethanol separation | 2012 | 170 | |
HKUST-1 from Cu(OH)2 nanotubes | Catalysis | 2013 | 172 | |
Fe3(BTC)2 from iron hydroxide | Catalysis | 2013 | 180 | |
Spray and plasma coating | Spray-coated HKUST-1 on paper, plastics and textile | Colourimetric gas sensor | 2013 | 184 |
Eu(Im)2 and Eu(Im)2/C on sapphire via PLD | Switchable transparency, luminescence | 2014 | 187 | |
Top-down patterning technologies for MOFs | ||||
Photolithography and imprinting | ZIF-9 on sol–gel patterns via DXRL | N2/CO2 selectivity | 2012 | 189 |
ZIF-8: Zn(mIm)2 on patterned photoresist | Chemical vapour optical sensor | 2012 | 37 | |
MIL-53(Al): Al(OH)(BDC) on patterned SU-8 | Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon sequestration and enzymatic activity evaluation | 2013 | 24 | |
Dynamic localisation of MOFs | ||||
(Fe3O4@SiO2)@HKUST-1 | HPLC separation | 2013 | 218 | |
Co@MOF-5 | Positioning/sensing | 2011 | 203 | |
Co@Zn4O(BDC)2.25(NH2BDC)0.75 | Positioning/sensing | 2013 | 147 | |
CoFe2O4 or NiFe2O4@MOF-5 | PAH sequestration | 2012 | 23 | |
Fe3O4@DUT-4: Al(OH)(ndc), DUT-5: Al(OH)(bpdc), and HKUST-1 | Thermal therapy and catalysis | 2011 | 204 | |
Fe3O4@Cu(bpdc) and Cu(bpy) | Catalysis | 2012 | 217 and 223 | |
Fe3O4@HKUST-1 | Drug delivery | 2011 | 210 | |
Fe3O4@HKUST-1 | Fuel decontamination | 2013 | 211 | |
Fe3O4@ZIF-8 | Catalysis | 2013 | 216 | |
Fe3O4@Zn(bix)(NO3) | Fluorescence probe | 2009 | 214 | |
Positioning functional materials within MOFs | ||||
Ag, Au@Ni(cyclam)2(bptc) | Ag and Au NP synthesis | 2006 | 245 | |
Ag@Ni(cyclam)(bpydc) | Ag NP redox synthesis | 2005 | 244 | |
Au, Ag@Rb-CD-MOF and Cs-CD-MOF | Ag and Au NP redox synthesis | 2011 | 247 | |
Au@MIL-100(Fe): Fe3O(OH)(BTC)2 | Catalysis | 2013 | 241 | |
Au@MOF-5 | SERS detection | 2013 | 240 | |
Eu3+@SMOF-1: In3(BTB)2 | White light emitter | 2012 | 234 | |
EuxTb1−x(dmBDC)3 | Thermometry | 2012 | 233 | |
Hemicyanine dye@bio-MOF-1: Zn8O(Ad)4(bpdc)6 | Two photon lasing | 2013 | 238 | |
Ir, Re, Ru WOCs@UiO-67: Zr6O4(OH)4(bpdc)6 | Water oxidation, CO2 reduction, organic photocatalysis | 2011 | 232 | |
Mg@SNU-90: Zn4O(atb)2 | Gas uptake | 2012 | 252 | |
Pd, Cu, Cu/ZnO, Au@MOF-5 | Catalysis | 2005 | 250 | |
Pd, Pd + Cu and Cu@MIL-101(Cr): Cr3OF(BDC)3 | CO catalytic oxidation | 2009 | 243 | |
Pd@MIL-100(Al): Al3O(OH)(BTC)2 | Hydrogen storage | 2010 | 248 | |
Pd@Zn3(ntb)2 | Hydrogen storage | 2009 | 246 | |
Pt@MIL-101(Cr) | H2 generation and CO oxidation | 2012 | 249 | |
Pt@Zr6O4(OH)4(L)6 (R: Ir based complex, see ref.) | Photocatalysis | 2012 | 242 | |
QD@MOF-5 | Thiol sieve with luminescence detection | 2012 | 239 | |
R-MOF-5: Zn4O(R-BDC)3 (R: see ref.) | Various properties with ligand tuning (i.e.: CO2/CO selectivity) | 2010 | 236 | |
Ru@MOF-5 | Catalysis | 2008 | 251 | |
Au@Al(OH)(ndc) | NIR induced molecular release | 2013 | 253 | |
Pd, Pt, Au@ZIF-8 shells | Size selective catalysis | 2012 | 255 | |
Dyes@MOF-5 and Rb-CD-MOF | Light responsive micropatterning | 2011 | 261 |
Heat-driven growth is a widely used approach in MOF synthesis, and is the general procedure used for the preparation of MFCs, as presented in Fig. 22. In the MOF precursor solutions (metal salt, organic ligand and proper solvent), magnetic nanoparticles are added (Fig. 22a). Either solvothermal or hydrothermal processes213 can then be used to induce the MOF growth (Fig. 22b). After MOF formation, the mixture usually contains unreacted magnetic particles, pure MOFs and MFCs; the former usually have a lower sedimentation rate and it is therefore possible to extract them without affecting the frameworks. Furthermore, an external magnetic field allows the pure MOFs to be efficiently separated from the MFCs and hence extracted from the growth solution, leaving behind a powder of the porous magnetic composite material (Fig. 22c–f).
Fig. 22 General synthetic route for MFCs32 (a) dispersion of magnetic particles in the precursors mix; (b) reaction mixture after solvothermal or hydrothermal reaction; (c) extraction of unreacted magnetic particles after sedimentation of MOFs and MFCs; (d) collection of MFC with an external magnet; (e) separation of MOFs from MFCs; (f) magnetic responsive MFC isolated and purified. Video animation provided as ESI.† |
Among the different approaches for the fabrication of MFCs,32 the main strategies to combine magnetic nanosystems into the framework are embedding or encapsulation. The difference depends on the use of naked magnetic particles or magnetic nanosystems with a buffer coating, respectively. In 2009, Imaz et al.214 pioneered the embedding technique using iron oxide nanoparticles into a zinc based framework, where the ligand was bix: 1,4-bis(1-imidazolyl)benzene. The Fe3O4@Zn(bix)(NO3) composite (Fig. 23a) was obtained in the form of 600 nm spheres, and the authors were also able to prepare multifunctional magnetic/luminescent MOFs.
Fig. 23 Electron microscopy images of different MFCs obtained in literature. (a) Fe3O4@Zn(bix)(NO3) from Imaz et al.;214 (b) Fe3O4@HKUST-1 from Ke et al.;210 (c) Fe3O4@HKUST-1 from Lohe et al.;204 (d) Fe3O4@ZIF-8 from Lu et al.;215 (e) Fe3O4@ZIF-8 from Zhang et al.;216 (f) Co@MOF-5 from Falcaro et al.;203 (g) NiFe2O4@MOF-5 from Doherty et al.;23 (h) Fe3O4@Cu(bpy) from Arai et al.;217 (i) Fe3O4@ZIF-8 from Carné-Sanchez et al.;211 (j) (Fe3O4@SiO2)@HKUST-1 from Silvestre et al.218 |
An important example of embedding synthesis was reported in the work of Ke et al.,210 where iron oxide nanorods were used to produce a HKUST-1 based MFCs (Fig. 23b), using a conventional heating route in water as the solvent (hydrothermal route), obtaining mainly irregular MFC nanoparticles in the range 50–150 nm. The nanocomposite was loaded with nimesulide and an in vitro test illustrating the delivery capacity for anti-inflammatory drugs was proposed. Almost at the same time, a similar protocol was proposed by Lohe and co-workers.204 In this study superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles were embedded into HKUST-1 and two different aluminium-based MOFs, DUT-4 Al(OH)(NDC) [H2NDC = 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid] and DUT-5 Al(OH)(bpdc) [H2bpdc = biphenyl-4,4′-carboxylic acid], using a solvothermal reaction in DMF in a Teflon lined stainless steel autoclave at 180 °C (Fig. 23c). In this case, the versatility of MFCs was demonstrated, providing evidence for both the catalytic performance of the composite made with DUT-4, and the possibility of applying an alternating magnetic field for the temperature-triggered release of ibuprofen with a magnetic HKUST-1 composite (Table 4).
Abbreviation | Meaning |
---|---|
a Framework sum formulas (water and solvent molecules omitted for simplicity). | |
Acronyms used in the text | |
μCP | Microcontact printing |
CD | Cyclodextrin |
DBT | Dibenzothiophene |
DEF | Diethylformamide |
DMF | Dimethylformamide |
DMSO | Dimethylsulfoxide |
DRM | Desert rose microparticle |
EDTA | Ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid |
EISA | Evaporation induced self assembly |
FITC | Fluorescein isothiocyanate |
FTO | Fluorine doped tin oxide |
LB | Langmuir–Blodgett |
LbL | Layer-by-layer |
LPE | Liquid epitaxial growth |
MFC | Magnetic framework composite |
MIMIC | Micromolding in capillary |
MOF | Metal organic framework |
PAF | Porous aromatic framework |
PAH | Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon |
PCP | Porous coordination polymer |
PDMS | Polydimethylsiloxane |
PEEK | Polyether ether ketone |
PEI | Polyethyleneimine |
PhTES | Phenyl triethoxysilane |
PSS | Polystyrene sulfonate |
PVP | Polyvinylpyrrolidone |
QCM | Quartz crystal microbalance |
QD | Quantum dot |
SAM | Self assembled monolayer |
SBU | Secondary building unit |
SPR | Surface plasmon resonance |
SURMOF | SURface anchored metal organic framework |
TCNQ | Tetracyanoquinodimethane |
VOC | Volatile organic compound |
ZIF | Zeolitic imidazolate framework |
IRMOF | Isoreticular metal organic framework |
Ligands names | |
bix | 1,4-Bis(1-imidazolyl)benzene |
bpy | 4,4′-Bispyridyl |
dabco | 1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane |
H2aBDC | 2-Aminoterephthalic acid (2-amino-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid) |
H2ADA | 4,4′-Azobenzenedicarboxylic acid |
H3atb | Aniline-2,4,6-tribenzoic acid |
H2BDC | Terephthalic acid (1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid) |
H2bpdc | Biphenyl-4,4′-carboxylic acid |
H4bptc | 1,1′-Biphenyl-2,2′,6,6′-tetracarboxylic acid |
H2bpydc | 2,2′-Bipyridyl-5,5′-dicarboxylic acid |
H3btb | 1,3,5-Tris(4-carboxyphenyl)benzene |
H3BTC | 1,3,5-Benzenetricarboxylic acid |
H2dhBDC | 2,5-Dihydroxy-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid |
H2dmBDC | 2,5-Dimethoxy-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid |
H2ndc | 1,4-Naphthalenedicarboxylic acid |
H2NDC | 2,6-Naphthalenedicarboxylic acid |
H3ntb | 4,4′,4′′-Nitrilotrisbenzoic acid |
H6TATPT | 2,4,6-Tris(2,5-dicarboxylphenylamino)-1,3,5-triazine |
H4TBAPy | 1,3,6,8-Tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)pyrene |
H4TCPB | 1,2,4,5-Tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)benzene |
H4TCPP | 5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin |
HIm | Imidazole |
HmIm | 2-Methylimidazole |
HbIm | Benzimidazole |
HnIm | 2-Nitroimidazole |
DUT-4 | Al(OH)(NDC) |
DUT-5 | Al(OH)(bpdc) |
HKUST-1 | Cu3(BTC)2 |
IRMOF-3 | Zn4O(aBDC)3 |
MIL-53(Al) | Al(OH)(BDC) |
MIL-53(Fe) | Fe(OH)(BDC) |
MIL-96(Al) | Al12O(OH)18(Al2(OH)4)(BTC)6 |
MIL-100(Al) | Al3O(OH)(BTC)2 |
MIL-100(Cr) | Cr3OF(BTC)2 |
MIL-100(Fe) | Fe3O(OH)(BTC)2 |
MIL-101(Cr) | Cr3OF(BDC)3 |
NH2-MIL-53(Al) | Al(OH)(aBDC) |
NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) | Fe3OCl(aBDC)3 |
NH2-MIL-125(Ti) | Ti8O8(OH)4(aBDC)6 |
MOF-2 | Zn2(bdc)2 |
MOF-5/IRMOF-1 | Zn4O(BDC)3 |
MOF-74(Ni) | Ni3[O3(BDC)1.5] |
MOF-177 | Zn4O(btb)2 |
MOF-508 | [Zn2(BDC)2(bpy)] |
NU-901 | Zr6O4(OH)4(TBAPy)3 |
SNU-90 | [Zn4O(atb)2] |
UiO-66 | Zr6O4(OH)4(BDC)6 |
UiO-67 | Zr6O4(OH)4(bpdc)6 |
NH2-UiO-66 | Zr6O4(OH)4(aBDC)6 |
ZIF-7 | Zn(bIm)2 |
ZIF-8 | Zn(mIm)2 |
ZIF-9 | Co(bIm)2 |
ZIF-67 | Co(Im)2 |
ZIF-69 | Zn(nIm)2 |
The encapsulation route exploits a buffer interface between the magnetic nanoparticles and the porous framework, provided by a coating that enhances the compatibility with the MOF (e.g. polymer or a carbonaceous coating).32 In the extensive report by Lu and co-workers on the precise encapsulation of nanoparticles in MOFs,215 8 nm iron oxide nanospheres were stabilized with amphiphilic polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) before being integrated into ZIF-8 (Fig. 23d). The non-ionic polymer is commonly regarded as a suitable stabilizing and capping agent for a wide range of nanoparticles in polar solvents like methanol or DMF.219 A similar approach was reported by Zhang et al.,216 in which Fe3O4 nanoparticles, prepared from the corresponding iron(III) chloride using a solvothermal approach, were coated with sodium polystyrene sulfonate (PSS). This anionic polymer altered the surface charge of the nanoparticles in order to enhance the absorption of zinc(II) ions, and improve the subsequent preparation of the composite, based on ZIF-8 (Fig. 23e).
In the work of Falcaro et al.,203 ferromagnetic carbon-coated cobalt nanoparticles were encapsulated into the archetypal MOF-5 using the block copolymer Pluronic F-127. The carbon coating was compatible with the organic ligand used in this synthesis,220–222 and the copolymer was used to prevent the premature sedimentation of the particles (Fig. 23f). In a similar procedure reported by Doherty et al.,23 cobalt ferrite and nickel ferrite nanofibres were inserted into MOF-5 using the same block copolymer. The obtained system (Fig. 23g) was used as a proof-of-concept for the time resolved monitoring and sequestration of PAH 1,2-benzanthracene.
The exploitation of a reacting group to enhance the grafting of the frameworks was brought to light by Arai and co-workers,217,223 where commercially available magnetic beads with carboxylic acid or amino groups on the surface form the basis for the preparation of composite MOFs with bpy (Fig. 23h) or H2bpdc ligands. These materials were used as recoverable catalysts for different reactions with >50% yields.
Using conventional batch synthetic approaches, the production of suitable quantities of MOFs and related MFCs can take several hours. For example, MOF-5 synthesis can take up to 24 hours to obtain a few milligrams of block crystals,126 while the standard protocol for the synthesis of aluminium based MIL-53(Al) takes 72 hours in an autoclave reaction.224 Although the addition of ceramic nano- and micro-particles can be used as crystallization facilitators,125,126 no evidence that magnetic nanoparticles can shorten the reaction time for the MOF synthesis has been reported to date.
An innovative synthetic method involving spray-drying has been developed in order to speed up the MFC synthesis. In the article from Carné-Sanchez and co-workers,211 micrometer sized hollow capsules of HKUST-1 were prepared using a commercial Mini Spray Dryer, opening the way to a low cost and scalable method for mass production of MOF particles. HKUST-1 was also prepared along with magnetic Fe3O4, providing a MFC superstructure in which the iron oxide nanoparticles were enclosed inside the cavity of the MOF capsules. The Fe3O4@hollow HKUST-1 (Fig. 23i) was investigated as a sequestering agent for the fuel contaminant dibenzothiophene (DBT), demonstrating the efficient extraction of 200 g of DBT for every kg of MFC used.
In the recent work of Park et al.,225 hierarchically functionalised colloid nanoparticles were prepared using an electrohydrodynamic co-jetting process, resulting in the growth of HKUST-1 MOF on the surface of compositionally anisotropic particles. The authors prepared two rationally designed copolymers with different butyl groups (linear and tertiary), both containing cross-linkable vinyl groups. Two syringes were filled with the linear butyl copolymer and a green dye, and a mixture of both copolymer and a blue dye, respectively. Subsequently, they co-jetted the two solutions in a laminar flow junction, producing a biphasic Taylor cone226 that was electrically deposited on an aluminium substrate in the form of patchy Janus particles.227 To induce the final spherical shape, the authors applied a short sonication treatment. To demonstrate the bicompartmental characteristics of their particles, a confocal microscope analysis showed two distinguished areas for every sphere, where the different colours were located. Using a selective deprotection of tert butyl groups with trifluoroacetic acid, only the blue coloured portion contained exposed carboxylic groups; a spatially controlled LbL growth of HKUST-1 was therefore possible only on this side. To demonstrate the possibility of obtaining a multifunctional composite, iron oxide nanoparticles were added in the green coloured copolymer solution. In this way, it was possible to further localise the magnetic particles in one portion of the final system, whereas the other part was surface grafted with the HKUST-1 MOF, obtaining a new kind of hierarchically functionalised organic inorganic hybrid with magnetically positionable porous MOF crystals. Given the magnetic property and the controllable porosity of this MFC, this system may find applications as a switchable catalyst, smart delivery vehicle, or smart adsorbent.
Fig. 24 (a) Design of Co@MOF-5 composite produced with the encapsulation approach; (b) representation of the magnetic finger force field and the obtained device (c). From Falcaro et al.203 (d) Three-zone experiment for the uptake of silver ions or silica nanoparticles under precise positioning of Co@Zn4O(BDC)2.25(aBDC)0.75 thanks to an external magnetic field; (e) EDX and SEM (inset) image of composite after sequestration of Ag+ ions. (f) Single Co@MOF-5 particle in a microfluidic device, moved from a reservoir to the 50 μm channel (g). From Falcaro et al.147 |
Further work on the precise control of MFCs in a defined space was reported in a subsequent article by Falcaro et al.147 A mixed component MOF99 was prepared with a 3:1 mixture of H2BDC acid and H2aBDC ligands, along with the encapsulation of cobalt nanoparticles, to obtain the composite with a nominal composition of Co@Zn4O(BDC)2.25(aBDC)0.75 (i.e. 25% amino-functionalised MOF-5). In this case, a single crystal X-ray diffraction study on the crystallinity of the cubic blocks highlighted the presence of different misaligned domains in a single particle; this effect was attributed to the presence of magnetic nanoparticles interfering with the continuity of the MOF lattice.
The ability to carefully govern the position of this MFC was demonstrated in a prototype device composed of a three-zone 1 mm glass capillary, containing two dodecane sections divided by a central, methanol filled, portion (Fig. 24d). In two separate experiments, this middle zone contained silver nitrate or epoxy functionalised silica particles. A single MFC particle was moved from the first section to the central one using an external magnet, allowing the MFC to sequester Ag+ ions, or react with the epoxy groups of SiO2 nanoparticles, then moved again to the final dodecane zone collecting the metal cations and the nanoparticles, respectively. The SEM/EDX analysis showed the presence of silver dispersed in the block MFC (Fig. 24e), and the surface functionalisation of the MFC with silica nanoparticles. Further investigation showed the movement of a single 50 μm sized particle in a custom microfluidic device, from a reservoir and into a 50 μm wide channel, illustrating the use of the MFC as a potential repositionable molecular gate (Fig. 24f and g).147
Silvestre and co-workers218 were the first to apply an innovative pathway for achieving controlled MOF thickness around a magnetic core, using the LbL approach. In their investigation, commercially available magnetic iron oxide–silica core–shell nanoparticles were initially functionalised with carboxylic groups through an APTES–glutaraldehyde–KMnO4 approach, and then alternatively poured into two reaction baths containing the metal ions and the ligands, respectively. Upon collection with a magnet after every cycle, the authors were able to obtain a (Fe3O4@SiO2)@HKUST-1 nanocomposite (Fig. 23j) and to relate the surface area of the resulting MFC with the number of cycles. This technique appears to be relatively time-consuming, as the cycle number was generally high to achieve an appreciable thickness (i.e. 40 cycles for 20–25 nm). As a proof-of-concept, the obtained MFC was used in the stationary phase for the chromatographic separation of three representative chemicals (pyridine, xylene, and toluene).218
A significant advancement in device fabrication for practical applications is the Fe3O4@ZIF-8 MFC designed by Zhang,216 which was produced using the encapsulation technique based on PSS coating of Fe3O4 particles. The MFC was successfully positioned and anchored in a tubular microreactor using a magnet, and was used as a catalyst in the flow reactor (Fig. 25a). The system including the MFC was used to perform the Knoevenagel condensation228 between benzaldehyde and ethyl cyanoacetate, illustrating the catalytic capability of ZIF-8 (HmIm ligand acted as an efficient base catalyst). The performance of this MFC was tested both in batch and in flow reactors, where 50% conversion and 100% were measured respectively after 25 minutes (Fig. 25b). Moreover, the magnetic field could be turned off in order to flush away the catalyst for subsequent washing and reactivation.
Fig. 25 (a) Schematic of the reactor used for the condensation reaction between benzaldehyde and ethyl cyanoacetate using Fe3O4@ZIF-8 MFC immobilized along the tube with a magnet; (b) results of the catalytic conversion. The inset shows the fast collection of the composite with an external magnet. From Zhang et al.216 |
The first comprehensive study for an ultrafast, versatile and continuous synthesis method for producing MOFs and composites was recently reported by Faustini and coworkers.150 This method for obtaining a number of different MOFs, as well as MOF@MOF core–shell systems and MFCs, takes advantage of a customized microfluidic device. The reaction was performed using microdroplets as reactors (Fig. 26a) providing significantly enhanced reaction rates. In the case of magnetic composites, a two-step protocol was adopted for the full synthesis of the porous magnetic material. Initially, Fe3O4 nanoparticles were prepared from an iron(III) chloride precursor, using an oil–water bubble sequence. The outcome of this step was transported downstream in a second T-junction reactor containing the ZIF-8 precursor solution along with PSS surfactant, a polymer shown effective for MOF grafting on magnetic particles. Overall, the process took 2 minutes at 80 °C for the iron oxide preparation, and an additional 5 minutes at 50 °C to obtain the final MFC (Fig. 26b). Moreover, the microfluidic device was used to perform a condensation reaction, by positioning the MFC at stages along the tube using an external magnetic field. The Knoevenagel model reaction between benzaldehyde and ethyl cyanoacetate was executed at 80 °C, obtaining a total conversion to product in less than 35 minutes of residence time. The novelty of this work is that functionalised ultraporous crystals were entirely synthesized and used in the miniaturised device, without the need for a conventional reactor and achieving appreciable yields. For example, in the case of HKUST-1, up to 100 mg per day were produced under controlled flow parameters.
Fig. 26 Microfluidic production and immobilization of Fe3O4@ZIF-8. (a) Schematic of the device used; (b) SEM images of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles successfully coated with ZIF-8 MOF. From Faustini et al.150 |
Compared with other porous materials, the exploitation of MOFs as a host for functional guest materials offers several benefits.53 Structurally diverse MOFs with various pore sizes can be prepared from a wide choice of metal ions and organic linkers,9,58 and thus an appropriate MOF can be easily selected as a host matrix. The three-dimensional porosity of MOFs, the presence of organic linkers that can stabilize guest materials, the sufficient structural properties and thermal stability makes MOFs suitable for use as host materials.
Traditionally, methods for positioning functional materials within MOFs have involved the direct doping of functional metal precursors, ligands, or functional particles during synthesis or through post functionalisation. Although this strategy has proven to be effective, engineering functional materials in precise locations within MOF crystals is a current area of research. Recently, new strategies have been proposed to precisely control the position of functional materials within a MOF crystal. These more sophisticated engineering methods for achieving control over the position of functional materials within MOF crystals opens a new research direction towards novel highly ordered hierarchical structures (Fig. 27).
This section will highlight several pioneering works for doping materials into MOFs, which have paved the road toward the control of materials at a specific location with the ultraporous crystals. Novel methods for precisely controlling the position of functional materials within MOF crystals will be subsequently proposed.
Several remarkable examples have been reported that successfully doped functional metal elements into MOFs. Lin and co-workers incorporated catalytic metal ions of Ir, Re, and Ru into the UiO-67 (Zr6O4(OH)4(bpdc)6).232 The doping metals were complexed with their matching ligands initially, and then the metal-ligand complexes were doped into the original UiO-67 framework. This strategy allowed for the loading of a sterically demanding bridging ligand into the parent UiO-67 framework, as well as preservation of the parent framework porosity. In a later study, Chen et al. successfully doped a source of Eu3+ into a Tb-dmBDC [H2dmBDC = 2,5-dimethoxy-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid] framework to form mixed-lanthanide frameworks.233 Because the single-lanthanide Tb-dmBDC and Eu-dmBDC frameworks are isostructural with 3D rod-packing structures, mixed-lanthanide frameworks could be readily formed by mixing both metal precursors with the ligand. Remarkably, the Eu-doped framework demonstrated a temperature-dependent luminescent property; a two-colour emission spectra was observed based on temperature variations. In addition, Nenoff et al.234 demonstrated that Eu3+ ions could be doped into In-btb [H3btb = 1,3,5-tris(4-carboxyphenyl)benzene] frameworks. Eu3+ was successfully added at three concentrations into the framework by the addition of a Eu metal source as a starting reagent with In(NO3)·H2O, H3btb and oxalic acid. With a 9% Eu3+ doping, the MOFs showed remarkable white light emission of chromaticity coordinates (0.33, 0.33) very close to the standard target (0.3127, 0.3290) in the chromaticity diagram given by the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE).234,235
Rather than doping functional metal ions, functional ligands could also be utilized to substitute the original organic linkers in MOFs, inducing new functionalities. Yaghi and co-workers showed that MOF-5 type structures could incorporate a range of functional derivatives of H2BDC in a way that mixed with the BDC linker, rather than forming separate domains.236 The synthesized multivariate MOF-5 type structures could incorporate up to 8 functional ligands (–NH2, –Br, –(Cl)2, –NO2, –(CH3)2, –C4H4, –(OC3H5)2, and –(OC7H7)2), resulting in 18 variants containing two or more functional ligands of distinctive functional MOF-5 structures. Crystals of multivariate MOFs were obtained by adding Zn(NO3)2·4H2O to a DMF solution mixture of the selected organic linkers. Exceptionally, the H2 storage capacity of –(OC3H5)2 and –(OC7H7)2 functionalised BDC-doped MOF-5 was 84% greater than the original MOF-5 crystals, while –NO2, –(OC3H5)2 and –(OC7H7)2 functionalised BDC-doped MOF-5 showed 400% better selectivity of CO2 over CO compared with the original MOF-5 materials. Specific functionalities (e.g. –NH2) can also be used for the uptake of metal ions.147
Bio-MOF-1 (Zn8(ad)4(bpdc)6O, ad = adenine) formed by reactions between adenine and zinc acetate dihydrate in DMF, is occupied by dimethylammonium cations (the product of DMF decomposition) within the channels. This allows the introduction of cationic materials through an ion-exchange process.237 Utilizing this property, Yu et al. loaded a cationic pyridinium hemicyanine dye into the framework.238 As the amount of loaded dye increased, the luminescence of the framework gradually shifted from blue (from H2bpdc linker) to red (dye) under UV irradiation. Importantly, the confinement of the dye within the pores of the framework restricted intramolecular torsional motion and π–π interactions between the dyes, overcoming the aggregation-caused quenching effect observed in both solution and powder form.
In 2012, Buso et al. adopted highly luminescent QDs as functional dopants within MOF-5 crystals.239 In this work, the synthesis and functionalisation of the frameworks was achieved in a one-pot process. The surface of the QDs was decorated with 5-amino-1-pentanol, which enabled their dispersion in the typical solvents used in the synthesis of MOF-5. The doping of QDs in the MOF-5 precursor solution was shown to have no influence on the crystal-formation kinetics. Interestingly, by varying the growth media, the QDs displayed distinctive distribution patterns within MOF-5. QDs were aggregated in the frameworks when using DMF as a solvent, whereas they showed homogeneous distribution patterns within MOF-5 crystals when using DEF suspensions. The resulting QD@MOF-5 crystals demonstrated size-selective optical sensing ability, allowing a small molecular quencher to enter the pores and quench the QDs within the MOF, while large quenchers had no effect on the QD@MOF-5 because of the sieving properties provided by the MOF. Sada and co-workers embedded Au nanorods in MOF-5 crystals by functionalising the surface of the nanorods with carboxylate groups followed by seeded growth of MOF-5;240 while Ke et al. prepared Au nanoparticles-loaded MIL-100(Fe) (Fe3O(OH)(BTC)2) frameworks in a LbL fashion by consecutively dipping the Au nanoparticles between the metal precursor and the ligand.241
Recently, Lin et al. demonstrated photoactive MOFs that have the ability to generate metal nanoparticles upon visible light irradiation.242 The MOFs were synthesized between Ir-chelated dicarboxylate-containing ligand and Zr4+. The nanoparticle precursor K2PtCl4 was infiltrated into the framework in triethylamine (TEA)-containing solvents. The MOFs were then irradiated with visible light with a 420 nm cut-off filter. TEA reductively quenched the photo-excited Ir-containing ligand to generate the radical, which reduces the metal precursor to form Pt nanoparticles within the host framework.
Microwave irradiation has also been explored for the formation of nanoparticles within MOF crystals.243 Metal precursors were firstly diffused into the pores of MIL-101(Cr) where, upon microwave heating, activation of the pores and reduction of metal precursors occurred simultaneously in the presence of a reducing agent. This caused the formation of small Pd, Cu, and Pd–Cu nanoparticles within the pores and larger particles on the surface of the MOF crystals.
Utilizing the intrinsic redox-active properties of particular MOFs, functional nanoparticles can be formed inside the framework without the need of any capping or reducing agents. To this end, Suh's group synthesized various redox-active MOFs employing various Ni(II) square-planar macrocyclic complexes as metal building blocks as well as utilizing redox-active organic building blocks.244–246 The inclusion of metal ion precursors into these frameworks resulted in the oxidation of incorporated Ni(II) species to Ni(III) and the simultaneous reduction of the metal ions, followed by the nucleation and growth of metal nanoparticles. Utilizing this strategy, this group has successfully formed Au, Ag, and Pb nanoparticles in the redox active frameworks.244–246
In a similar approach, Grzybowski and coworkers synthesized two cyclodextrin (CD)-based MOFs using RbOH and CsOH as the metal source.247 The resulting MOFs contained one hydroxide counter ion per metal center, which can work either alone or cooperatively with the CD units as redox centers to reduce metal salt precursors into metal nanoparticles. It was demonstrated that the redox active MOFs could reduce Au and Ag ions to form nanoparticles when the metal precursors HAuCl4 or AgNO3 were infiltrated into the frameworks. Interestingly, the formation of Au nanoparticles occurred predominantly in the core of the crystal, while Ag nanoparticles were deposited throughout the entire MOF crystal.
By employing a reducing agent such as H2 gas, metal precursors introduced into MOFs can be converted to nanoparticles within the framework. In one study, Latroche and co-workers immersed MIL-100(Al) (Al3O(OH)(BTC)2) in Pb precursor solutions containing 10% (v/v) aqueous HCl solution of H2PdCl4. Up to 10 wt% Pd nanoparticles were formed within the frameworks using a flow of Ar–H2.248 Very recently, Xu and co-workers introduced a “double solvent” method for the formation of Pt nanoparticles inside MIL-101(Cr) frameworks.249 The frameworks were immersed in a large amount of hydrophobic solvent (hexane), to which a hydrophilic solvent (water) containing the metal precursor H2PtCl6 was added, with an amount equal to or less than the total pore volume of the framework. Because the inner surface of the framework is much larger and more hydrophilic than the outer surface, the small amount of aqueous phase containing the metal precursor was readily incorporated into the pores by capillary forces, which minimizes the deposition of the precursor on the outer surface. After loading the precursor, a H2–He stream was employed to produce the Pt nanoparticles within the framework.
Functional nanoparticles formed by chemical vapor deposition with MOFs involves the infiltration of volatile organometallic precursors into the framework, followed by hydrogenolysis. MOF-5 has been shown to successfully host various organometallic precursors containing Pb, Cu, Au, and Ru in its pores. After the treatment with a H2 stream at hydrogenolysis temperatures, metal nanoclusters were formed within MOF-5.250,251 Recently, magnesium nanocrystal formation within the SNU-90 (Zn4O(atb)2, H3atb = aniline-2,4,6-tribenzoic acid) framework was demonstrated.252 The composite material was made by thermal decomposition of precursor vapor within the MOF crystals.
In 2011, Falcaro et al. pioneered this field of research by precisely positioning a multifunctional particle within MOF crystals.125 They demonstrated how a multifunctional particle could be simultaneously employed as both a nucleating agent and a directing agent for MOF-5 crystal formation. They synthesized a novel class of α-hopeite microparticles (ceramic microspheres), which formed immediately within the starting MOF-5 precursor solution when Pluronic F-127 was introduced. As a result, the growth kinetics of MOF-5 in the presence of the α-hopeite microparticles is three times faster than the traditional solvothermal approach. The versatility of these ceramic microparticles was demonstrated by successful incorporation of catalytic metal nanoparticles (Pt and Pd), highly luminescent semiconductor QDs (CdSe–CdS–ZnS) or polymer nanoparticles (Teflon) in the core of MOF-5 crystals (Fig. 28a and b).
Fig. 28 (a) SEM image of a DRM. The inset of the figure shows the electron diffraction pattern of the DRMs, indexed as α-hopeite. (b) X-ray microtomography images of MOF-5 nucleated around two DRMs. The small images on the top-right are the measured tomography of the crystals' exterior surfaces.125 TEM images of (c) Au nanorods, and (d) core–shell Au nanorod–MOF composites.253 TEM image of (e) Au nanoparticles and (f) hybrid crystals obtained when Au nanoparticles were introduced 15 minutes after the initiation of the reaction.215 (g) TEM image of bare Au nanoparticles. (h) HAADF-STEM image of core–shell Au@MOF-5 NPs.254 (i) TEM image of the Pd@Cu2O core–shell nanoparticles. (j) Yolk–shell structures with ZIF-8 shell and Pd octahedra in the hollow space.255 SEM image of (k) silica particles, and (l) ZIF-8 crystals around a silica particle.256 SEM images of (m) Janus polymer microparticles, and (n) HKUST-1 nanocrystal-functionalised bicompartmental particles.225 (o) SEM images of Prussian blue frameworks, and (p) TEM image of Prussian blue yolk–shell particles.257 SEM image of (q) silicon nanowires, and (r) HKUST-1 on silicon nanowires.258 |
Furukawa and co-workers employed coordination replication techniques to position gold nanorods inside an Al(OH)(ndc) framework.253 The surface of the gold nanorods were firstly coated with thiolated polyethylene glycol (SH-PEG). This provides surface properties which allowed a layer of amorphous alumina to be formed on its surface. The coordination replication process was carried out in the presence of H2ndc in a microwave-assisted reaction to convert the out-of-equilibrium alumina coatings to more stable Al(OH)(ndc) frameworks. A model fluorescent molecule anthracene was loaded into the highly porous frameworks. Upon exposure to the near infrared (NIR) laser, the gold nanorods within the MOF crystals were rapidly heated, causing the release of the anthracene from the frameworks (Fig. 28c and d).
Lu et al. also demonstrated a versatile approach for positioning functional nanoparticles in ZIF-8 frameworks.215 This strategy relies on coating various functional nanoparticles with PVP, followed by MOF crystal formation around PVP-coated nanoparticles. PVP served as both a “general” surfactant to stabilize various nanoparticles in polar solvents, and a capping agent to control the size and shape of nanoparticles. ZIF-8 crystals that contained Pt, CdTe, Fe3O4 and lanthanide-doped NaYF4 nanoparticles/nanorods, Ag nanocubes, polystyrene (PS) spheres, β-FeOOH nanorods were prepared successfully using this approach. Nanoparticle-doped ZIF-8 exhibited molecular sieving and regioselective guest reactivity from the microporous nature of MOF as well as functional (catalytic, magnetic and optical) properties that derive from the incorporated nanoparticles (Fig. 28e and f).
He et al. reported a remarkable method of positioning individual Au nanoparticles within a single MOF-5 particle.254 Different from the conventional two-step method to synthesize nanoparticle–MOF composites by adding the pre-synthesized particles into the MOF precursors, they directly mixed both the Au and MOF precursors (HAuCl4, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, and H2BDC) in the reaction solution containing DMF, PVP, and ethanol at 140 °C. DMF was expected to facilitate MOF-5 formation, while PVP was employed to stabilize the readily formed Au nanoparticles,219 and ethanol changed the coordination environment of metal ions such that MOF-5 grew preferentially around the Au nanoparticles instead of self-nucleating in solution. It was found that HAuCl4 was first reduced to Au nanoparticles by DMF within a very short time. Subsequently, MOF-5 was formed and spontaneously grew on the surface of the PVP-capped Au nanoparticles, so that uniform core–shell Au@MOF-5 crystals were produced (Fig. 28g and h).
Kuo et al. synthesized novel core–shell MOFs with Pd nanoparticles as a core in a ZIF-8 shell.255 Pd octahedral nanocrystals were firstly coated with Cu2O by the addition of CuCl2, NaOH, and NH2OH·HCl to form a Pd@Cu2O core–shell structure. After Cu2O coating, the Pd@Cu2O structures were mixed with the ZIF-8 precursors HmIm and zinc nitrate in methanol. Importantly, the addition of 2-meIm also caused the reduction of pH from 7 to 5, because of the deprotonation of HmIm, and the Cu2O was etched off simultaneously with the formation of ZIF-8 shell. Elemental analysis was used to confirm the complete removal of Cu2O within the core–shell structure (Fig. 28i and j). This novel structure provided excellent molecular-size selectivity. The results showed high activity for the ethylene and cyclohexene hydrogenations but not in the cyclooctene hydrogenation.
Sorribas et al. adopted 3 μm-diameter silica particles as a core to grow ZIF-8 crystals around the silica, forming core–shell structures.256 This strategy involved in situ seeding and secondary crystal growth. Due to the abundant silanol groups on the silica surface, the interaction between silanol groups and metal precursors Zn2+ promoted ZIF-8 nucleation on the spheres. After 5 min, this seeding process provided a uniform ZIF-8 seed layer around the silica spheres with an average crystal size of 180 nm, as confirmed by TEM. Thicker ZIF-8 layers were achieved simply by immersing the seeded silica particles in the ZIF-8 precursor solution once or twice, yielding ZIF-8 shell around silica particles with a thickness of ∼410 nm and ∼550 nm, respectively (Fig. 28k and l).
Beyond the control of functional materials within MOFs, the architecture of the hybrid materials could also be controlled in a precise way. Very recently, Park and co-workers showed the spatio-selective growth of MOF nanocrystals on anisotropic polymer microparticles.225 Janus particles were synthesized with an electrohydrodynamic co-jetting process. Carboxylic groups were functionalised only on one side of the particle surface. A spatially controlled layer-by-layer growth of HKUST-1 was therefore possible only on the carboxylate-functionalised side. The inclusion of paramagnetic nanoparticles on the other side of the Janus particles allowed a new kind of hierarchically functionalised hybrid materials on which porous MOF nanocrystals could be magnetically manipulated (Fig. 28m and n). Hu et al. presented an elegant strategy to tailor the architecture of Prussian blue (PB) frameworks.259 Hollow interiors within the frameworks were created through controlled chemical etching in the presence of PVP. The hollow cavities and particle sizes could be tuned by changing the synthetic conditions, and the original PB crystallinity was preserved even after formation of interior hollows. They further developed this controlled hollowing process by step-by-step crystal growth and subsequent etching strategy. As a result, various types of crystals with shell-in-shell, yolk–shell, and yolk-double-shell hollow structures could be synthesized. The resultant hollow-based nanoarchitectures significantly increased gas adsorption and revealed interesting magnetic properties (Fig. 28o and p).257 Cui and coworkers have selectively grown HKUST-1 crystals on silicon nanowires. The nanowires were firstly modified with carboxylates oxidizing a surface functionalisation initially involving (3-cyanopropyl)trichlorosilane. This allowed the preferential formation of MOF seeds on the nanowire surface. The MOF seed-coated nanowires were then immersed into MOF precursor solution in a step-by-step fashion (repeated LPE), yielding silicon nanowires coated with controlled thickness of MOF crystals (Fig. 28q and r).258
Han et al. developed a modified wet stamping technique that allowed for patterns of dyes and indicators to be imprinted into MOFs.261 MOF-5 and CD-MOF-2 (CD = cyclodextrin) were selected for the proof of concept based on two reasons: the interconnected porosity of these frameworks allows the diffusion of the dyes and indicators through the framework, and the established method for preparing millimeter-scale frameworks makes it possible to use stamps with micron sized features. Stamps synthesized from agarose or furfurylamido-bisphenol A diglycidyl ether organogel were impregnated with a variety of dyes, the MOF crystal was then positioned on top of the stamp to allow the patterns to be transferred onto the MOF, and the dyes were diffused within the porous crystal. Utilizing this technique, a pH indicator (methyl orange) and a photochromic dye (diarylethane) was patterned into the frameworks. The pH indicator-functionalised frameworks changed between yellow and red upon exposure to ammonia gas and gaseous hydrochloric acid, while the photochromic dye-functionalised MOFs changed between transparent and blue when irradiated with UV and visible light repeatedly (Fig. 29).261
Fig. 29 (a–f) Schematic of wet printing technique to create micropatterns onto a single MOF. (a–b) A micropatterned stamp is impregnated with a dye (b). (c) The MOF crystal is then positioned on top of the stamp and (d and f) the pattern is transferred onto the MOF and the dye is adsorbed within the porous crystal. (g–j) Images of reversible and responsive micropatterns printed onto MOFs. (g and h) The pH indicator (methyl orange) printed frameworks switch between yellow and red upon exposure to ammonia gas and gaseous hydrochloric acid. (i and j) A photochromic dye (diaryl ethene) printed framework switches between transparent and blue when irradiated with UV and visible light repeatedly (scale bars 100 μs). Reproduced from Han et al.261 |
Remarkable proof-of-concept applications have been provided. For example, the QD-loaded MOF-5 could be used as a molecular sieve sensor.125 Using emission-quenching agents (thiols), it was shown that only thiols with a small enough molecular size could effectively diffuse through the framework and quench the emission of the functional QDs located in the crystals' cores. Similarly, the yolk–shell Pd@ZIF-8 crystals provided excellent molecular-size selectivity. Pd core showed high activity for the ethylene and cyclohexene hydrogenations but not in the cyclooctene hydrogenation due to the size exclusion of the ZIF-8 shell.255 The Au nanorod-loaded Al(OH)(ndc) framework demonstrated photothermal properties, resulting in the implementation of unique motion-induced molecular release, triggered by the highly efficient conversion of optical energy into heat by Au.253 This allowed temporal control of the release of a loaded drug, anthracene, from the framework for potential drug delivery applications. Moreover, Au nanoparticles inside MOF-5 crystal showed surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) for highly sensitive detection of CO2 by combining the advantage of the selective adsorption property of the MOF-5 shell and the optical enhancement of the Au nanoparticles.254 in addition, the simple procedure to create patterns on a MOF by wet stamping and the precise control of Ag pattern in a MOF by direct laser writing are expected to find applications in optic or microelectronic device fabrications.260,261
Fig. 30 (a) MOF-based piezoresistive microcantilever;264 (b) MOF-deposited gold QCM electrodes;55 (c) HKUST-1 film on aluminium electrodes;266 (d) magnetic manipulation of Fe3O4-loaded ZIF-8;269 (e) near infrared-induced drug release from gold nanorod-loaded MOF;253 (f) MOF-5-coated fused-silica capillary;270 (g) HKUST-1-coated silica magnetic bead;218 (h) MOF-5 magnetic framework composite and the uptake of benzanthracene;271 (i) HKUST-1 incorporated micro-separator assembly;100 (j) porous aromatic framework structure with a highlighted p-phenylene rotor;22 (k) projection of a MOF–peptide ‘boat’ around the Petri-dish;21 (l) TCNQ molecule entering a HKUST-1 film devices;16 (m) MOF patterns created by UV lithography;24 (n) photosensitive MOFs for cell activation;57 (o) cell activation by irradiation-induced selective release of NO from MOF devices;57 (p) MOF thin film-based reversible electrochromic device;272 (q) MOF-based white emitting LED;273 (r) ZIF-8-based Fabry–Perot interferometer;274 (s) photoexcited organic linker induced electron transfer from the linker-to-cluster charge-transfer mechanism;275 (t) MOF-coated doctor bladed TiO2–MWCNTs composite;276 (u) gold electrodes attached to a single MOF crystal;277 (v) magnetic framework composite immobilized into a microfluidic catalytic system;150 (w) HKUST-1 films on a photolithographed copper plate.172 |
Allendorf et al. were the first to apply the LPE and LbL techniques to a sensor type device.264 They formed a stress induced chemical detector consisting of an array of 10 Au-coated micro-cantilevers, with a thiol based SAM and then grew HKUST-1 MOF layers on top (Fig. 31a). As certain molecules were selectively absorbed into the highly porous MOF coating, the stress induced by the increased mass was detected on the micro-cantilever. The array was immersed in alternative ethanol solutions of Cu(OAc)2 and H3BTC to build MOF films to a thickness of 100 nm. The resulting hydrated MOF sensors showed rapid and reversible responses to H2O, MeOH and EtOH in the gas phase, and responded to CO2 when the HKUST-1 MOF was used in its dehydrated state.264 This study was further extended to detect VOCs. The piezoresistive microcantilevers responses allowed the detection of 12 different VOCs and were able to distinguish between them based on shape, response time and signal amplitude.265
Fig. 31 (a) SEM of piezoresistive microcantilever and inset SEM of MOF deposition (scale bar 2 μm), from Allendorf et al.;264 (b) schematic of the QCM platform (transparent plate) where MOFs are deposited on the gold electrodes (yellow), from Tsotsalas.;55 (c) photograph of HKUST-1 MOF film (left) with Al electrodes attached (right) and SEM image of MOF film surface, from Liu et al.266 |
MOFs have been grown on a QCM for the measurement and detection of small molecules within the highly porous films.55,262,263,278,279 QCMs are highly sensitive mass sensors that measure the sorption properties of porous materials. The gold-coated piezo-active quartz crystals can be functionalised with a SAM for MOF growth. Bein et al. used a 11-mercaptoundecanol SAM layer for the direct growth of HKUST-1 and were able to show the water vapour sorption properties of the thin MOF films at various temperatures.278 A hysteresis between the adsorption and desorption is seen at low temperatures but not at higher temperatures.278 Wöll et al. measured the pyridine diffusion coefficient on a MOF-based QCM device by monitoring the time-dependence mass-uptake.262 The thiolate-based SAM was coated on the quartz crystal to which HKUST-1 was grown using the LbL approach. Assuming Fickian diffusion and a hoping mechanism, the diffusion coefficient was in good agreement with the quantum mechanical calculations.262
Kitagawa's group have also demonstrated the use of HKUST-1 QCM devices (Fig. 31b) to measure the sorption of organic vapours (methanol and hexane)263 and guest molecules of similar size but different chemistry (1-butanol, diethyl ether, and n-pentane).55 They showed that strong intermolecular reactions can cause the guest molecules to cluster within the porous framework and temporarily slow desorption rates.55 At low analyte concentration, the sensor response is dependent on the MOF crystal size, whereas at high analyte concentrations the sorption kinetics is more significant.263 Recently Kitagawa's group extended the QCM study to heterogeneous MOF films where alternative layers of MOFs are epitaxially grown on the crystal surface.279 Two MOFs of (type 1) [Cu2(ndc)2(dabco)]n and (type 2) [Cu2(aBDC)2(dabco)]n; [Cu2(HOOC(CH2)2OCNH-bdc)(aBDC)(dabco)]n, are grown in layers using the LbL approach.279 The QCM results measuring VOCs of different size and polarity indicated that the sequence of the MOF coatings greatly affects the sensitivity. The QCM could selectively adsorb methanol from a methanol–hexane mixture if the type 2 MOF was grown on top of the type 1 MOF but the inverse structure did not show any selectivity.279
Liu et al. prepared a capacitive humidity sensor by the direct nucleation and growth of HKUST-1 MOFs on a copper substrate (Fig. 31c).266 The uniform MOF film has two Al electrodes attached at each end and was connected to an electronic circuit and probed with an alternating current (AC). The capacitance response for the MOF sensor was linear at 1000 Hz frequency and showed good sensitivity and quick response to various relative humidities at different temperatures.266 MOFs have also been used in impedimetric sensors for the detection of hydrophilic molecules in the gas phase (e.g. water, alcohols).280
Allendorf et al. developed a MOF-based quartz SAW sensor for humidity detection.267 The SAW sensor detects gases by measuring a frequency shift of acoustic waves parallel to the quartz substrate. The HKUST-1 MOF was prepared using an automated LbL technique directly on the quartz surface as the freshly cleaved quartz surface formed silanol groups from the hydrolysis of ambient water. The highly polar silanol groups coordinate with the water molecules in the Cu2(–CO2)4(H2O)2-paddle-wheel building units during MOF formation.267 The SAW sensor showed a 3-fold improvement in humidity response compared to the HKUST-1 QCM sensors.15
Furukawa and co-workers positioned Au nanorods inside aluminium-based MOFs to form a stimuli-responsive device (Fig. 32a).253 This strategy relies on coordination replication techniques to convert the alumina-coatings on the Au nanorods to Al(OH)(ndc) frameworks.170 A model drug, anthracene was loaded into the frameworks. The Au nanorods in the MOFs allowed the implementation of unique motion-induced molecular release of anthracene, triggered by the highly efficient conversion of optical energy into heat that occurs when the Au nanorods are irradiated into their plasmon band.253
Fig. 32 (a) Concept of the light triggered release of a guest molecule from an aluminium based MOF containing Au nanorods, from Khaletskaya et al.;253 (b) fluorescein doped magnetic ZIF-8 based nanoparticles collection and inset TEM of MOF composite, from Zhuang et al.269 |
ZIF-8 crystals have recently been optimised to serve as drug carriers (Fig. 32b).269 Due to the pH-responsive nature of the imidazole ligand, the coordination between the zinc and imidazolate ions dissociates at acidic pH, which makes ZIF-8 ideal for targeting cancer cells where extracellular microenvironments (pH 5.7–7.8) are more acidic than healthy tissues. The encapsulation of magnetic nanoparticles in ZIF-8 spheres further enhanced their functionality, which offered a simple route for manipulating the location of the nanocrystals for potential target delivery applications.
HKUST-1 crystals were loaded with superparamagnetic magnetite particles, making a Magnetic Framework Composite (MFC)32 called M-HKUST-1, providing an easy manipulation method for controlling the location of MOFs,204 which could be beneficial for targeted drug delivery applications by applying a static magnetic field. Moreover, when exposed to an external alternating magnetic field, M-HKUST-1 rapidly heated up, which could potentially trigger the release of loaded drugs.
The use of MOFs for gas separation is one of the most promising and developed applications. Recently MOF films and membranes have been prepared using the layer-by-layer growth techniques for these applications.270,283,284 Münch et al. developed chromatographic capillaries coated with MOF-5 using the LbL approach with a carboxylic terminated SAM (Fig. 33a).270 Controlled growth of MOF-5 was possible by pumping through the inorganic SBU and the organic linkers alternatively between washing steps. Although the technique produced thicker films than expected due to incomplete removal of the reactants between steps, the chromatography capillaries showed promising performance for more than 300 chromatographic separations.270
Fig. 33 (a) SEM image of a gas chromatography capillary coated with MOF-5 using the LbL technique and the inset shows a magnified view of the MOF coating (scale bar equals 10 μm), from Munch et al.;270 (b) schematic of the micro-separator assembly which incorporates HKUST-1 into the micro-channels via electrochemical deposition, from Van Assche et al.;100 (c) reduction of 1,2-benzanthracene from solution due to uptake from a MOF-5 magnetic framework composite (inset), from Doherty et al.;23 (d) silica magnetic bead coated with HKUST-1 for sequestration of aromatic compounds (scale bar 100 nm), from Silvestre et al.218 |
Fischer's group applied the liquid phase deposition technique to prepare CO2 selective MOF membranes.283 Pumping alternative metal precursor and organic linker reactants through the porous ceramic supports, two isoreticular MOF membranes were prepared; the non-polar [Cu2(ndc)2(dabco)]n and the polar [Cu2(BME-bdc)2(dabco)]n. (H2BME-bdc = 2,5-bis(2-methoxyethoxy)-1,4-benzene dicarboxylic acid). The gas separation of equimolar CO2–CH4 mixtures indicated anti-Knudsen separation for the polar membrane and Knudsen separation from the non-polar membrane.283 Lee et al. prepared Ni-MOF-74 membranes on alumina supports via a layer-by-layer seeding technique followed by secondary growth MOF formation.284 The use of a SAM layer was not needed due to the covalent bonds between the carbonyl groups of the organic MOF linker and the surface hydroxide groups of the alumina supports. The resulting membranes showed Knudsen diffusion for H2, N2 and CH4 and surface diffusion for CO2.284
Van Assche et al. have recently developed a micro-separator integrating MOF micro channels via an electrochemical deposition technique.96,100 The device comprised of HKUST-1 layers rapidly grown inside micro-channels machined into a copper sheet (Fig. 33b). The leak-free micro-separator device showed a promising ability for the separation of n-hexane and methanol vapours at faster adsorption rates than a conventional packed bed. The rapid mass and heat transfer make this suitable for catalysis and sensing type applications as the short adsorption–desorption cycles minimises the volume of MOF required.100
Sequestration of pollutants and contaminants is another promising field for MOF devices. Much work has focused on preparing magnetic framework composites (MFCs)53 embedding magnetic particles so that the MOF crystals can be collected and the adsorbed molecules recovered/disposed.23,25,218,285 Doherty et al. prepared MOF-5 MFCs for the sequestration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.23 Using NiFe2O4 and CoFe2O4 fibres, they grew MOF-5 crystals which could be positioned in solution with the use of a commercial magnet. The MFCs successfully sequestered a four aromatic ring molecule, 1,2-benzanthracene, from solution with an uptake of 1.3 mmol g−1 over 400 minutes (Fig. 33c).23
Huo and Yan also demonstrated the sequestration of PAH from environmental water samples using MIL-101 MOF crystals decorated with magnetic nanoparticles.25 Silvestre et al. used the LbL technique to coat HKUST-1 MOFs around COOH terminated silica magnetic beads (Fig. 33d).218 They were then able to demonstrate the use of these MFCs32 as chromatographic materials for toluene, p-xylene and pyridine. The results showed that pyridine had longer retention times within the porous MOF framework due to its ability to coordinate with the Cu(II) atoms. These appear to be promising materials for chromatography.218
The sequestration of heavy metal contaminants is another potential application for MFCs.286,287 Bagheri et al. used magnetic FCs to uptake palladium from environmental samples. Pyridine-functionalised Fe3O4 nanoparticles were embedded into HKUST-1 MOFs and showed remarkable recovery of palladium from both real water samples and certified samples.286
Ikezoe et al. demonstrated an autonomous biochemical motor through the integration of MOFs and self-assembling peptides.21 The porous MOF framework ([Cu2(BDC)2ted]n, ted = triethylendiamine) was initially loaded with diphenylalanine (DPA) peptides within its porous lattice (Fig. 34a) under incubation in 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol solvent. After the solvent was removed, the loaded MOFs were placed in a solution of water and sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (Na-EDTA). The EDTA allows the slow release of the DPA peptides due to the gradual decomposition of the MOF structure. Upon release from the MOF, the peptides re-align at the water/MOF interface which creates a large surface tension gradient around the MOF, hence propelling it through the solution (Fig. 34a).21 These MOF–peptide composites offer the potential for using MOFs in biomimetic motors which can be studied to gain an understanding of energy transduction in biological systems.21
Fig. 34 (a) DPA peptides assembled within the porous MOF structure are released as the MOF decomposes and the resulting surface tension projects the MOF–peptide ‘boat’ around the Petri-dish, from Ikezoe et al.;21 (b) schematic of the PAF structure (C-blue, H-white) with a highlighted p-phenylene rotor with van der Waals radii, from Gates et al.2 |
Comotti et al. recently reported on the potential of molecular rotors of porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs) by investigating the rotational motion of PAF's structural elements in response to guest molecules.22Fig. 34b shows a schematic of an ideal PAF where a p-phenylene rotor is represented with the van der Waals radii and the red arrow illustrates its rotary motion. This local rotational motion is detected with 2H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis and shows that dynamic motion is present even at low temperatures (200 K). Comotti et al. deduced that the rotors are each isolated within the PAF giving them freedom for fast rotation but this movement is dampened by the presence of guest molecules such as n-alkanes and iodine.2 This sensitivity to guest molecules suggests that these porous materials would be ideal for sensing devices to detect the presence of pollutants or contaminants.2 This work suggests that a similar concept might be applied into MOFs.
Dragässer et al. investigated the electrochemical properties of HKUST-1 films on Au substrates functionalised with a thiol SAM, by determining the charge transport across the insulating membrane using ferrocene as an immobilised redox mediator.296 Tuning the electrical properties of SURMOFs using the controlled LPE technique makes them attractive materials as electrodes.296 Huo et al. prepared ZIF-8 films on 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane SAM coated indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes using the LbL process, and investigated their potential use in photochemical applications.297
Allendorf and co-workers have recently reported the ability to tune the electrical conductivity in HKUST-1 MOF thin film devices.16 Here, the pores within the MOFs are loaded with redox-active, conjugated guest molecules [7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinododimethane (TCNQ)] (Fig. 35). The authors were able to tune the electrical conductivity over six orders of magnitude due to the TCNQ molecule providing a bridge between the dimeric Cu subunits, hence creating a conductive path through the MOF unit cell.16
Fig. 35 Optical image of thin MOF film devices before and after TCNQ infiltration (above), schematic of TCNQ molecule entering a HKUST-1 MOF pore, and SEM of the MOF coating (below). Reproduced from Talin et al.16 |
As microelectronic chips are miniaturised, they also require insulating materials with low dielectric constants (κ) as well as relatively high elastic modulus (>3 GPa), minimal pore sizes (<5 nm) and hydrophobicity.298,299 MOFs are emerging as possible candidates as potential low dielectric materials as the ability to control their localisation advances.7 Eslava et al. have deposited ZIF-8 films on silicon wafers and measured the dielectric constant through impedance measurements at various temperatures and frequencies. The ZIF-8 films showed promising results with κ only 2.33 ± 0.05 at 100 kHz therefore indicating their potential for future microelectronic chips.298
Zhan et al. have developed MOF@semiconductor heterostructures to demonstrate their selective photoelectrochemical response.300 They prepared core–shell structures where ZIF-8 was grown onto ZnO nanorod arrays, which feature semiconductive properties. The ZnO nanorods are the source of the Zn ions under hydrothermal conditions together with a solution of DMF and HmIm. The resulting metal oxide semiconducting@MOF core–shell heterostructures featured photochemical responses to hole scavengers small enough to enter the pores of the ZIF-8 shell. This was therefore an effective route to form a H2O2 sensor.300
For energy production, there are different functionalities of MOFs that can be exploited for device fabrication, including hydrogen production, photovoltaics and fuel cells.303 Gomes Silva and co-workers have been pioneering the field of hydrogen production using UiO-66, NH2-UiO-66, and Pt doped NH2-UiO-66.304 Under exposure to UV light, charge separation in the Zr–MOF systems was used for the production of hydrogen from a water–methanol mixture. A further extension to the visible light spectrum was proposed by Fateeva and co-workers using a post-functionalised Al–porphyrin MOF with Pt.305 Horiuchi and co-workers used the linker-to-cluster charge-transfer (LCCT) mechanism for electron transfer from the photoexcited organic linker using a Pt–Ti-MOF-NH2 system (Fig. 36a).275 Although this research field is showing promising results, the ability to position MOFs with hydrogen production capability will help the fabrication, and potentially the commercialization of this type of green energy production device.
Fig. 36 (a) Schematic of the charge transfer mechanism in the photocatalytic hydrogen production over titanium based MOF with Pt nanoparticles, from Horiuchi et al.;275 (b) composite film (left) of titania and multiwalled carbon nanotubes after sensitization with a Cu based MOF (left), from Lee et al.;276 (c) a single crystal of a zinc based coordination framework attached to gold electrodes, from Umeyama et al.277 |
Another promising application in MOF technology is the fabrication of MOFs with the ability to harvest energy directly from light.306 This is possible by tuning the energy gap of MOFs with their semiconductive properties.292,293 Lee et al. reported the fabrication of HKUST-1 using the LbL technique, doped with iodine onto a doctor-bladed TiO2 nanoparticle film.307 The authors demonstrated that the electrical resistance behaviour of the system could be switched from an insulator to an electrical conductor. Remarkably, it was shown that the energy gap (HOMO–LUMO) and the positions of the iodine-doped Cu–MOFs are promising as a sensitizing layer in TiO2-based liquid junction photovoltaic cells. In a subsequent report, Lee and co-workers demonstrated that the interfacial charge transfer resistance was significantly improved by adding multi wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) into the TiO2 particle film (Fig. 36b).276 The improved electron transfer rate showed an enhanced photovoltaic performance.
Fuel cells are an alternative technology for energy production with low carbon emissions. They are galvanic cells, in which the free energy of a chemical reaction is converted into electrical energy (via an electrical current).308 Recently, MOFs have shown the capability to be used for proton conductivity,309 which is an important functionality for fuel cell device fabrication.277,310 MOFs can show proton conductive properties via the framework itself or by doping it with protonic charge carrier species (Fig. 36c). Reviews analysing in detail the different aspects related to this emerging technology have been recently published.56,94,303,311 As highlighted by Horike et al.56,277 MOF crystals can provide anisotropic ion conductivity (e.g. in a 2D layered MOF structure, the conductivity along the direction parallel to the 2-D layer is much higher than for the perpendicular direction). In this regard, mastering the crystal growth and position would help to engineer and optimise the conductive properties of MOFs.
Lu and Hupp prepared a MOF-based Fabry–Perot interferometer for selective gas sensing.274 ZIF-8 was grown as thin films by cyclically immersing an etched silicon or glass slide in the precursor solutions containing zinc nitrate and HmIm, respectively (Fig. 37a). They were able to estimate the amount of deposited MOF using QCM measurements, relating the thickness with the repeated cycles. Moreover, different thicknesses provided different colours due to the optical interference in the visible region. Thanks to the absorption feature provided by porous ZIF-8, and the resonating properties of this interferometer, the authors obtained different transmission spectra upon exposing the film to various vapours. Therefore it was possible to correlate the peak shift to the concentration of various analytes, obtaining a mostly linear relationship in the case of propane, the possibility to distinguish between linear hexane and bulky cyclohexane, and eventually to detect the presence of ethanol in water as low as 0.3% v/v, corresponding to an ethanol concentration of 100 ppm.
Fig. 37 (a) A series of ZIF-8 films of different thickness on a silicon substrate, from ref. 274; (b) photograph of a white LED fabricated using a cadmium based MOF loaded with an iridium base complex without (left) and with a 150 mA current applied (right), from ref. 273; (c) photos of the electrochromism of a zirconium based MOF thin film on FTO electrode before (left) and after (right) applying a 1.6 V potential, from ref. 272. |
Sun et al. built an efficient MOF-based white emitting LED with high quantum yield.273 A cadmium based framework with a blue emitting hexadentate ligand [H6TATPT = 2,4,6-tris(2,5-dicarboxylphenylamino)-1,3,5-triazine] was produced on the basis that d10 CdII metal centres exhibit highly photoactive capability when bound to functional ligands. In this case, the authors initially prepared the ligand reacting H2aBDC and cyanuric chloride. Subsequently, a yellow emitting IrIII complex was loaded into the cavities of the framework. With a loading of 3.5 wt% the resultant LED emitter generated bright white light upon excitation at 370 nm with a considerable quantum yield of 20.4% (Fig. 37b). This value was obtained because of the optimal separation provided by the MOF cavities of the encapsulated iridium complex, thus preventing its aggregation. Furthermore, exchange between dimethylammonium ions and EuIII or TbIII allowed a colour change emission from pink (due to europium) to green (due to terbium).
Kung et al. prepared an reversible electrochromic device based on a zirconium framework thin film.272 Using FTO as the substrate, NU-901 (Zr6O6(OH)4(TBAPy)3) MOF was grown after a preliminary soaking in the tetradentate pyrene based ligand [H4TBAPy = 1,3,6,8-tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)pyrene] and subsequent growth in a temperature gradient oven in the presence of more ligand and zirconium chloride. The transparent yellow coloured thin film with a uniform thickness of 1 μm was integrated in an electrochemical cell. Upon cyclic voltammetry analysis, a +1.6 V anodic peak was attributed to the redox response from the pyrene ligand, as the zirconium centres were found unresponsive. Under different applied potentials, UV-vis spectra showed a large absorbance increase centered at 587 nm, along with a decrease at 405 nm. This spectroscopic change was manifested with an evident colour switch from yellow to blue, that was also shown to be reversible during a 10-cycle test (Fig. 37c). The electrochromism was facilitated by the MOF porosity and its particular morphology, indeed Raman spectroscopy and electron paramagnetic resonance investigations demonstrated that a one-electron oxidation of the pyrene ligands was facilitated thanks to the spatial separation provided by the framework architecture, preventing the pyrene dimerization.
Fig. 38 (a) Schematic of the platform used for the localized cell stimulation mediated by the NO release from MOF, and the demonstration of spatial control, scale bar is 100 μm (b), from Diring et al.;57 (c) aluminium based MOF patterned on SU-8 photoresist and grafted with an enzyme, from Doherty et al.24 |
Spatiotemporal control of MOF fabrication has been realized for designing advanced 3D MOF architectures such as hollow capsules that have found potential in bioreactors or loading of biomolecules.152 Such capsules were synthesized by interfacial formation of a continuous MOF layer using a biphasic synthesis mixture consisting of an aqueous metal-ion-containing droplet in an organic ligand solution. Selective permeability of these capsules was directly related to the micropore size of the MOF crystallites forming the capsule walls. Moreover, with the ability to tune the structures and porosities of various MOFs, better interactions and higher drug loadings could be achieved. These devices are well suited for selectively hosting and release of biomolecules for biomedical applications.319
Sachse et al.179 were the first to prepare a MOF catalyst for a continuous flow reaction. Thanks to the coordinatively unsaturated copper metal centres, HKUST-1 was regarded as a suitable catalyst for the Lewis acid reaction. Firstly, they prepared a macro/mesoporous silica monolith by hydrolysis of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) in the presence of polyethyleneoxide polymer, growing the monolith onto a PVC tube. After drying and calcination, HKUST-1 was synthesized in situ by immersing the highly porous support in the HKUST-1 precursor solution, evaluating the catalyst content using a thermogravimetric approach and obtaining a 25% loading. The monolith was inserted into a heat-shrinkable tube and used for the continuous flow synthesis of a substituted quinoline via the Friedländer reaction, obtaining a steady 85% conversion after 4 h flow, a calculated yield of 826 g of product per g of catalyst per day, and demonstrating that the immobilized HKUST-1 was 2.5 times more productive than a commercial HKUST-1 powder, thanks to the higher efficiency of the nanosized MOF crystal in the monolith.
Okada et al.271 produced patternable HKUST-1 films on a photolithographed copper plate. The HKUST-1 growth from the copper plate was achieved using a two-step protocol: at first, Cu(OH)2 nanotubes were obtained on the copper substrate using a basic oxidation approach with ammonium persulphate,175 they were then converted into HKUST-1 crystals adding an ethanolic aqueous solution of the tridentate ligand H3BTC.174 The HKUST-1 immobilized catalyst was proven mechanically resistant to sonication, and used for the Friedländer reaction obtaining an 80% conversion after 16 hours. Moreover, it was possible to grow this type of MOF on several substrates, flat plates, meshes, microsized grids, and PCB boards. Patterns were also prepared via a photolithographic approach using sunlight (Fig. 39a).
Fig. 39 (a) Sunlight driven photolithography of a Cu plated plastic board for the subsequent HKUST-1 film growth (insets), from Okada et al.;172 (b) schematic of the microfluidic device used for the flow reaction using Fe3O4@ZIF-8 magnetic framework composite (inset), from Faustini et al.216 |
Faustini et al.150 prepared a MFC and immobilized it into a flow reactor thanks to an external magnetic field. A two-step protocol was entirely performed using a microfluidic system generating confined microdroplet reactors using a water–oil fed T-junction, to obtain the core–shell Fe3O4@ZIF-8 composite. Initially iron oxide microspheres were prepared from iron chloride in ethylene glycol at 80 °C. The as-obtained magnetic particles were therefore injected into a second droplet generator, where a methanolic solution of zinc nitrate and HmIm in the presence of PSS was flowing. This polymer was found suitable for the efficient growth of MOF onto iron oxide nanoparticles because its anionic nature enhances the accumulation of zinc cations on the particles.216 The magnetic ZIF composite was immobilized on the inside wall of a capillary microreactor by applying a magnetic field, and a Knoevenagel condensation between benzaldehyde and ethyl cyanoacetate was performed in continuous flow (Fig. 39b). Compared to the batch synthesis, the flow reaction efficiency was drastically improved from a 49% conversion after 50 minutes of reaction under mechanical stirring to a 99% conversion after 35 minutes of residence time in capillary, thanks to the fast mass transfer and efficient mixing between the heterogeneous catalyst and reagent in the microreactor.
• Improved control over the location of crystal formation in order to have MOFs with functional properties only in selected regions resulting from bottom-up approaches.
• Mastering the crystal orientation (in plane and out of plane ordering and crystal density) is crucial to take full advantage of the anisotropic properties of the porous MOF crystals.
• Control over particle size distribution, particle morphology and form factor is important for achieving uniform and high resolution patterns, when pre-prepared MOFs are used for device fabrication. This is very important for top-down microfabrication techniques and dynamic localisation methods with MOFs.
• Optimization of the growing conditions of MOFs for hosting biomolecules. Although a few biomolecules such as anti-cancer drugs and sensing/fluorescent molecules have been successfully incorporated within MOFs, to encapsulate fragile biomolecules such as proteins and DNA that are sensitive to MOF growth conditions (e.g. organic solvent, high salt concentrations, low/high pH, high temperatures) still remains challenging.
• A deeper understanding of evaporative processes driving the self assembly of MOF-based materials should be sought. This would improve the versatility, crystal orientation, homogeneity and crystal density of MOFs for the fabrication of patterns where EISA is used. Important processes that would benefit from progress in this area include dip coating deposition, seeding, μCP, spray coating and ink-jet printing.
• Access to new lithographic or positioning approaches for the fast, cheap and versatile micro-fabrication of MOFs is necessary for rapid progress in the field.
• Exploring continuous processes, rather than discontinuous ones, for industrial fabrication; the advantages of such protocols have been proposed, but further investigation is needed for a better understanding of the potential.
• MOFs that can be selectively etched would advance top-down fabrication methods. Different steps are involved in many lithographic protocols, and having access to MOFs capable of resisting certain type of solvents while dissolving in others would help photolithographic approaches. A key fabrication challenge is to logistically incorporate multiple MOF structures of various chemistries and functionalities into one platform. This would expand the potential field of MOF-based applications.
• Using magnets with controllable features (e.g. miniaturised static or electro-magnets) would allow for precise and accurate positioning in the micrometer range for MFCs. Alternatively, incorporating them into microfluidic circuits would allow for MOF growth into integrated multifunctional platforms.
• Design of MOFs with specific stimuli-responsive properties for potential drug delivery applications. The utilization of either external triggers such as light, temperature and magnetic forces, or biological/cellular triggers such as pH, redox, and enzyme variations for MOF-based smart drug delivery devices should be achieved.
• Investigation of the mechanical stability of patterned MOFs; ideally the pattern should be stable under mechanical stimuli and only a few reports have addressed this challenge in order to ensure that MOFs are firmly anchored on a substrate.
• Aging of MOFs should be optimised. Maintaining the integrity of MOFs, avoiding loss of functional properties and contamination due to decomposition of MOF components must be improved. This would allow for extended shelf-life of MOF-based devices.
• Two main aspects should be better investigated: the biocompatibility of framework based materials for in vivo applications, such as thermally triggered drug release possibly coupled with fluorescent labels; and the environmental compatibility, with regards to the synthetic techniques, which involves the elimination of hazardous solvents and ions, in order to fulfil green chemistry requirements.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: This material includes video animations to illustrate a variety of MOF patterning techniques, including: microcontact printing for self-assembled monolayers, liquid-phase epitaxy, layer-by-layer, gel-layer, electrochemical, precision milling, seeding, microcontact printing of MOF, micromolding in capillaries, pen-type, photolithography combined with conversion from ceramics, microcontact printing combined with conversion from ceramics, ink-jet printing, spray coating, photolithography with positive and negative resists, photolithography (deep X-ray lithography), photolithography (UV), photolithography combined with imprinting, and magnetic framework composite fabrication. See DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00089g |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 |