Hassan
Rashidi
,
Jing
Yang
and
Kevin M.
Shakesheff
*
Wolfson Centre for Stem Cells, Tissue Engineering and Modelling, Division of Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom. E-mail: kevin.shakesheff@nottingham.ac.uk
First published on 7th August 2014
When using polymer materials as scaffolds for tissue engineering or regenerative medicine applications the initial, and often lasting, interaction between cells and the material are via surfaces. Surface engineering is an important strategy in materials fabrication to control and tailor cell interactions whilst preserving desirable bulk materials properties. Surface engineering methods have been described that can strongly influence cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, differentiation and functionality. This review aims to categorise the current strategies for modifying surface chemistry and/or topography in terms of the resultant change in cell behaviour.
When these synthetic materials are used in vitro or in vivo they will encounter a protein rich medium that conditions the material surface.9–12 The protein rich medium may be the cell culture medium added with cells for in vitro applications or the local interstitial fluid at the site of implantation for in vivo applications. The surface conditioning is driven by the thermodynamics of protein adsorption. The chemical properties of the material will strongly influence the final composition of the adsorbed protein layers and, in turn, this will influence the response of local cells and tissues. The choice of synthetic material to be used in a scaffold is driven by issues such as the processability of the polymer, the chemistry of bulk biodegradation, mechanical properties and logistical issues of cost, compatibility with sterilisation techniques and shelf life. These properties do not necessarily ensure that the surface properties of the final scaffold are optimal for protein and cell interaction.
Hence, there is often a requirement to change the surface properties of scaffold materials without changing bulk properties. Surface engineering strategies to enhance protein and cell interactions fall into 2 distinct categories; chemical and topographical modifications. These strategies are often inspired by the features of extracellular matrices (ECM). The contribution of nano-scale features of ECM to the modulation of cell-matrix signalling and cell behaviour is a well-known phenomenon. ECM consists of multiple proteins and polysaccharides, which act as a natural tissue scaffold. It has a crucial role in cell survival, proliferation and differentiation by providing spatial, biochemical and mechanical cues.13,14 ECM intrinsic factors are involved in the activation of intracellular signalling pathways through adhesion receptors, such as integrins.15–17 Moreover, it has been well documented that physical cues and topography of the ECM orchestrate cell behaviour through a phenomenon known as cellular guidance.18–20
Techniques and approaches to engineer the chemistry and topography of synthetic scaffolds have been reviewed by others previously.12,21–26 Therefore, in the next section we provide a concise summary of approaches and refer the reader to more detailed reviews and original papers for further information.
Technique | Summary of approach | Surface chemistry modification | References |
---|---|---|---|
Introduce new functional groups onto scaffold polymer surface | |||
Surface hydrolysis | Soaking of polymer scaffold in an acidic or alkaline solution. | Hydrolysed ester groups to form carboxylic acid and hydroxyl groups. | 55 |
Oxygen plasma etching | Etch the substrate material with oxygen plasma to introduce functional groups. | Presentation of oxygen containing functional groups. | 110 |
UV/ozone treatment | Oxidise the substrate material with UV/ozone at ambient conditions. | Presentation of oxygen and nitrogen containing functional groups. | 75 |
Covalent grafting of peptides | Graft peptides onto scaffolding materials using coupling reactions such as reactions involving carbodiimide. If functional groups for coupling reaction are not present on the polymer, then it will need to be modified to introduce functional groups for subsequent grafting. | Presentation of grafted peptides. | 74,111 |
Coating with thin layer of another polymer or chemical species | |||
Plasma polymerisation | Polymerisation of monomer vapours under mild temperatures on the substrate scaffolding materials for retaining the functional groups of the monomers. | Presentation of the functional groups of the plasma polymers. | 60,112,113 |
Physical adsorption | Immersing scaffolding materials in protein or peptide grafted polymer solutions. The adsorbed layer physically attaches to the scaffolding material. | Presentation of the physically adsorbed layer. | 56,114 |
Surface entrapment | A region of the material close to and including the surface is swollen by a partial solvent. The surface modifying agent is dissolved in the partial solvent. When the solvent is removed the modifying agent is trapped at the surface. | Presentation of biomolecules or polymers containing cell adhesion peptides. | 57,115 |
Layer by layer assembly | The substrate is first modified with a charged layer; another layer with opposite charge is then applied onto the first layer. Thicker coatings can be achieved by repeating the process. | Presentation of self-assembled bilayers. | 54,116 |
In situ apatite formation | Apatite is formed on the scaffolding materials by soaking the scaffold in simulated body fluids. | Surface formed apatite. | 109,117 |
The choice of method is driven by the type of polymer used to form the scaffold, the scaffold structure and final surface chemistry required. Direct chemical modification of the surface requires the chemistry of the synthetic polymer to permit the modification (e.g. to undergo hydrolysis). Coating methods are applicable to different scaffolds depending on the surface charge, solvent interaction and surface energy. A final factor to consider is the scaffold structure. Small pore networks within the scaffold can restrict access to coating materials especially in plasma polymerisation.
Advances in micro- and nano-scale fabrication techniques have enabled incorporation of micro- to nano-scale topographic features onto various substrate surfaces. Recent developments have come from adaptation of techniques routinely used in the production of semiconductors by the electronics industry. Photolithography was the first among these technologies which was utilised to create topographic patterns of 5–100 micrometers for stem cell research.34 Increasing demand to create smaller length scale patterns led to the development of alternative methodologies such as electron beam lithography to create topographic features as small as 3–5 nm.35 Lithographically established patterns can be transferred into supporting substrate through an etch process. In order to fabricate samples directly to substrates for biological experiments, Nickel shims can be prepared from master samples to replicate patterns either by hot embossing or injection moulding.36
Nanotopographic geometries can be categorised into anisotropic topography like nanogrooved and aligned fibres or isotropic topography such as nanopillar/post and nanopit. In addition, nanofeatures can be created evenly through substrate or distributed unevenly (i.e. varying groove width) to create topographic gradients (Fig. 1 and 2).
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 Scanning electron microscopy of nanopits with hexagonal, square, near square order with a random displacement of ±50 nm and random arrangements, respectively. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature Materials.32 |
The alteration of surface topography also influences adherence and migration of cells. In general, nanopits and nanoposts reduce cell adhesion, while enhanced adhesion can be achieved on nanograting substrates. In contrast to random trajectories of migration on flat surfaces, increased overall migration velocities are observed in the direction of the grating axis on nanogratings, while little information is available regarding cell migration on nanoposts and nanopillars (Table 2). Despite extensive knowledge regarding fundamental mechanisms of cell migration, little is known about molecular mechanism by which directional migration is promoted by local 3D architectures.51 Although recent advances suggest decreased mechanical forces through down-regulation and high turnover of a focal adhesion protein known as zyxin as the underlying mechanism of focal adhesion remodelling in human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) cultured on 350 nm gratings,52 further studies must be aimed to fully elucidate mechanisms by which local 3D topography encourages directional cell migration. In addition, further studies are required to further examine the influence of feature geometry and size on adhesion.
Cell type | Substrate material | Physical modification | Functional outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
PDMS, poly(dimethylsiloxane); Si, silicon; PUA, poly(urethane acrylate). | ||||
bPASMCs | PDMS | Microposts, 2–10 μm in diameter, 3–50 μm in height | Cells adhesion, spread across and deflected multiple posts | 31 |
hCECs | Si | Nanogrooves, 70 nm width, 600 nm depth | Elongation and alignment along micrometer- and nanometer-sized grooves and ridges | 118,119 |
hECs | PDMS | Nanogrooves, 1200 nm width, 600 nm depth | Elongation along ridges, formation of well-defined capillary tubes following induction by Matrigel | 93 |
NIH 3T3 fibroblast | PUA | Gradient Microgrooves, 1–9.1 μm | Enhanced adherence to denser features; alignment, elongation and bias migration along the direction of ridges | 50 |
Similarly, cell adhesion and spreading vary following the introduction of different chemical groups or combinations of physical and chemical modifications onto substrates (Tables 3 and 4). Using model surfaces of self-assembled monolayers of silanes, attachment of human fibroblasts was found to be highest on amine and carboxylic acid terminated surfaces. Cell spreading was also highest on these two surfaces. In comparison, –CH3, –PEG and –OH terminated surfaces showed much lower cell attachment and spreading. The amount of protein adsorbed to the –CH3, amine and carboxylic acid presenting surfaces were similar despite the significantly lower amount of cell attachment and spreading on –CH3 surfaces.53 In another study, the attachment of rabbit ear chondrocytes on poly(L-lactide) acid (PLLA) scaffold was significantly improved after aminolysis in 1,6-hexanediamine solution, and was furthered improved by coating with a three bilayer of chondroitin sulphate/collagen I.54 The aminolysis requires the immersion of PLLA scaffolds in 1,6-hexanediamine at elevated temperature, which can damage the bulk property of the scaffold. Adhesion of smooth muscle cells was also found to be increased on hydrolysed PGA mesh compared to un-treated mesh.55 However, the degradation of PGA in sodium hydroxide solution during the hydrolysis process was significant, with a fibre diameter loss of 50% in approximately 6 minutes. Physical adsorption of fibronectin also increased cell adhesion of osteoblasts on PLGA porous scaffolds. A concentration of 200 nM of fibronectin with an incubation time of 2 hours was found to be effective to promote cell adhesion.56 This method is a simple one-step procedure; however, the stability of the adsorbed protein layer is a concern. The coverage and conformation of the adsorbed protein layer may also depend on the chemistry, surface energy and surface charge of the substrate. The attachment of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts was found to be increased on the gelatin entrapped surface.57 Gelatin particles were used as sacrificial materials to generate porous PLLA scaffolds. During the dissolution and leaching out stage of the gelatin particles within the PLLA scaffolds, some of the gelatin molecules are trapped within the PLLA material, as verified by ATR-FTIR and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. The entrapment requires the selection of a right solvent that can dissolve the molecules that promote cell adhesion and swells the substrate material. This requirement can hinder the application of this method to different adhesion-promoting molecules and scaffolding materials. Surface chemistry has also been reported to affect the polarity of epithelial cells. Laminin-111 coated PLGA nanofibre scaffolds have been found to promote mature tight junctions.58
Cell type | Substrate material | Chemical modification | Functional outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
AHDCS, adult human-derived corneal stromal cells; bVSMCs, bovine vascular smooth muscle cells; HBC, hydroxybutyl chitosan; hCECs, human corneal epithelial cells; hECs, human endothelial cells; PAA, poly(acrylamide); PMMA, poly(methyl methacrylate); ppAAm, plasma polymerised allylamine; TCPS, tissue culture poly(styrene). | ||||
bVSMCs | PGA | Surface hydrolysis, hydrolyse ester groups and form carboxylic acid and hydroxyl groups | Increased cell adhesion and seeding density | 55 |
Rat osteosarcoma cell line | TCPS | Plasma copolymerisation of acrylic acid and 1,7 octadiene | Improved cell adhesion to plasma copolymer surface | 112 |
Human keratinocytes | TCPS | Plasma copolymerisation of acrylic acid/1,7 octadiene and allyl amine/1,7 octadiene | Improved adhesion of keratinocytes on acrylic acid/1,7 octadiene with low concentration of carboxylic acid groups in similar level to collagen-I | 60 |
Human osteoprogenitor | PDLLA & PLGA | Physical adsorption of RGD–PLL or fibronectin to PDLLA substrate | Enhanced adhesion and spreading following both modifications, successful osteogenic differentiation into mature osteogenic phenotype | 56 |
Bovine aortic endothelial cells | PDLLA | Adsorption of PLL–GRGDS | Increased in spreading, inhibition of spreading at high concentration of PLL–GRGDS | 114 |
Human fibroblast | Glass or silicon | Self-assembled monolayers, Silanisation of glass or silicon surfaces with silanes terminated with CH3, Br, CH![]() |
Strong adhesion, spreading, fibronectin formation and growth and enhanced activity of integrins on –COOH and –NH2 terminated surface, weak interaction with –CH3, –PEG and –OH | 53 |
MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts | PLA | Surface entrapment of gelatin | Increased hydrophilicity following gelatine entrapment, Significant enhancement of cell adhesion and proliferation | 57 |
3T3 fibroblast | Glass | Plasma polymerisation of allyl amine and hexane | Increased cell density in the core of millimetre-scale size scaffolds | 113 |
NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, human megakaryocytic M07e | Glass, gold, titanium oxide, various polymers such as PTFE and PS | Covalent bond to inorganic oxides and amine containing organic surfaces. | Water contact angle change to similar values after coating various substrates with dopamine, Significant attachment of fibroblasts after coating various substrate with dopamine and PEG–SH | 120 |
SaOS-2 osteosarcoma cell line | Gelatin/bioglass composite | In situ apatite formation | Enhanced attachment and secretion of ECM | 117 |
Cell type | Substrate material | Chemical modification | Physical modification | Functional outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLL: poly-L-lysine; PHBV: Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate); PET: poly(ethyleneterephthalate); rHPN: rat hippocampal pyramid neurons. | |||||
Rat hippocampal neurons | Glass | Adsorption of PLL | Microgrooves, 20–40 & 50–100 μm width, 5 μm depth | Effective guidance of neuritis outgrowth and number | 37 |
MC3T3-E1 S14 Osteoblasts | PHBV | Adsorption of fibronectin or immobilisation of alkaline phosphatase | Microgrooves, 1–10 μm width, 10–30 μm depth & micropits, 4 μm width, 5 μm depth | Improved cell adhesion and alignment | 38 |
Human keratinocyte | PET | Plasma deposition of acrylic acid (cell adhesive) and poly(ethylene oxide (cell repulsive) | Conical nanoposts, 117 ± 5 nm height | Improved cell adhesion | 39 |
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells | PET | Plasma deposition of acetaldehyde | Aligned fibres, 100 μm diameter | promotion of cell attachment and spreading, formation of focal adhesion | 41 |
rHPN | Glass | Adsorption of PLL | Microgrooved pattern, 2 & 15 μm width, 1 μm depth | promotion of specifically polarized morphology by guidance cue pattern | 42 |
Plasma polymers with carboxylic acid and nitrogen containing functionalities are found to increase the adhesion of keratinocytes.59,60 These plasma polymerised polymers are formed on the top of substrates under mild temperatures which do not destroy the functionalities of the monomers. The thickness of the plasma polymer layers can be controlled within the nanometer range by varying parameters such as deposition time. The diffusion of plasma polymers into pores is dependent on the pore size,61 which limits the application of this technique to scaffolds with large pores and relatively small construct sizes.
Covalently grafting of proteins and peptides offers advantages over physical adsorption in terms of improving the stability of the modification. Chondrocytes from cartilage tissue of rabbit ears showed higher adhesion after 24 hours culture on PLLA with covalently tethered collagen compared to bare PLLA.62 To graft collagen to PLLA, hydroperoxide groups were first introduced onto the PLLA surface by treating the material with UV and hydrogen peroxide. Carboxyl groups were then introduced onto the PLLA surface by grafting methacrylic acids to form PLLA-g-PMAA which was later activated by 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide for subsequent conjugation to collagen. This method requires the treatment of scaffolding materials in harsh chemicals and processing conditions which can damage the bulk properties and requires a multiple-step procedure including extensive washing to remove chemical residues. A similar procedure was applied to covalently graft collagen to PCL.63
Surface chemistry has also been employed to pattern surfaces with two distinct chemistries for the co-culture of hepatocytes and NIH 3T3-J2 cells. In this study, borosilicate wafers were first coated with a layer of photoresist, patterns were then applied to the substrate using UV through a mask, and the photoresist on these patterned areas was removed for subsequent covalent tether of collagen. The remaining photoresist was then removed in acetone by sonication. Hepatocytes selectively adhered to the collagen coated areas and NIH 3T3-J2 cells attached to the rest of borosilicate surfaces.64 A simpler method of patterning surfaces has been achieved by inkjet printing of collagen solutions onto (2-[methoxy(polyethyleneoxy)propyl]trichlorosilane treated glass slides. The collagen-free parts of the surfaces were then coated with poly(L-lysine) (PLL). Hepatocytes were first seeded, and adhered only to the collagen coated surfaces. Fibroblasts were then allowed to adhere to the PLL coated regions.65 More recently, a novel micropatterning technique introduced using combination of aerosol deposition (airbrushing) of ECM proteins through microstencil and plasma polymerisation in order to create complex patterns of hydrophilic regions on poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) surface.66
It is important to note that some surface modifications can change the bulk properties, e.g. biodegradation, of the biodegradable polymers. For example, surface modification using wet-chemical processes can lead to a faster degradation rate and reduction of mechanical performance.67 Ozone oxidation, UV- and γ-radiation also lead to degradation of biodegradable polymers.68–70 In contrast, plasma-assisted surface modification offers a method to incorporate functional groups on biodegradable polymers without altering the bulk properties.67
Cell type | Material | Chemical modification | Physical modification | Functional outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; hiPSCs, human induced pluripotency stem cells; hMECs, human microvascular endothelial cells; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; mESCs, mouse embryonic stem cells; PAS, peptide-acrylate surfaces; PCL, poly(caprolactone); PES, poly(ethersulfone); PET, poly(ethyleneterephthalate); PMMA, poly(methyl methacrylate; ppAAm, plasma polymerised allylamine; PS, spin-cast thin polystyrene; rNSC, rat neural stem cells; TCPS, tissue culture poly(styrene). | |||||
mESCs | Polyamide | — | Randomly oriented nanofibres, 280 nm average diameter | Promotion of proliferation and self-renewal of mESCs through Rac, PI3 K/AKT signalling | 71 |
hMSCs | Glass | Self-assembled monolayers, Silanisation of the surface. | — | The –CH3 surfaces maintained the hMSC phenotype. The –NH2 and –SH-modified surfaces promoted and maintained osteogenesis both in the presence and absence of biological stimuli. The –OH and –COOH-modified surfaces promoted and maintained chondrogenesis under both basal and chondrogenic stimulated conditions. | 105 |
3T3 dermal fibroblast | PMMA | Plasma deposition (gradient of ppAAm) | Gradient of microgrooves, 5–95 μm width, 3 μm depth | Significant increase in cell proliferation in area with optimal groove width and wettability | 43 |
rNSC | PES | — | Nanofibres, 273 ± 45 to 1452 ± 312 nm diameter | Lower proliferation compared to cells cultured on laminin-coated 2D surface in the presence of bFGF, lower degree of cell aggregation and higher degree of proliferation and cell spreading as the fibre diameter decreased | 86 |
hESCs | PAS | Covalent conjugation | — | Supporting self-renewal in chemically-defined, xeno-free medium comparable to that on Matrigel™, retain of normal karyotype | 74 |
hESCs | PS | Oxygen plasma etching | — | Maintenance of self-renewal and stable karyotype comparable to that on Matrigel™, multi-germ layer in vitro differentiation | 76 |
hESCs & hiPSCs | PS | UV/ozone treatment | — | Maintenance of self-renewal at optimised UV dose comparable to that on Matrigel™ | 75 |
hMECs | PET | — | Ripples & Walls, 300 nm & 1.5 μm | Induced proliferation as a result of nuclear accumulation of β-catenin | 73 |
HUVECs | PCL | Aminolysis and covalent grafting of collagen | — | Significantly improved cell adhesion and proliferation | 63 |
hESCs | Polystyrene | — | Nanopillars, 50–400 nm height | Maintenance of Oct4 expression in absence of bFGF, downregulation of Oct4 in presence of bFGF in honeycomb configuration | 72 |
In a study by Schernthaner and colleagues, nuclear accumulation of β-catenin and activation of specific β-catenin target genes was suggested as the mechanism responsible for higher rates of proliferation in endothelial cells (ECs) cultured on a polymer culture substrate with laser-generated nanopatterns.73
It has been shown that chemically modified polyacrylates and polystyrene surfaces can support stem cell self-renewal. Self-renewal of embryonic stem cells in defined medium was found to be similar on carboxylic acid containing acrylate surfaces tethered with peptides from vitronectin and bone sialoprotein and on Matrigel.74 Both oxygen plasma and UV/ozone treatment were found to be able to modify a polystyrene surface to support self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells.75,76
High throughput methods have been developed to screen large numbers of different materials and their surface chemistries.77,78 Some polyacrylates after coating with serum have been identified to support self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells.78 Certain integrins binding proteins, such as vitronectin, have been found to play an important role in controlling stem cell fate.
Cell type | Material | Physical modification | Functional outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
HBC, hydroxybutyl chitosan. | ||||
hMSCs & osteoprogenitors | PMMA | Nanopits, 120 nm diameter, 100 nm depth | Stimulation of hMSC osteogenic differentiation on disordered nanoscale features in absence of osteogenic supplements | 32 |
hMSCs | HBC & HBC/collagen | Aligned nanofibres, 200–900 nm average diameter | Enhanced alignment, upregulation of myogenic gene markers | 85 |
hMSCs | PDMS | Nano- and microgratings, 350 nm, 1 or 10 μm width, 350 nm depth | Significant up-regulation of neuronal markers compared to micropatterned and unpatterned, further enhancement of differentiation in presence of biochemical cues such as retinoic acid | 80 |
mESC | PCL | Aligned nanofibres, 250 nm average diameter | Neural differentiation of mESCs seeded directly onto PCL nanofibres, minimal astrocytic differentiation. | 121 |
hMSCs | PUA | Nanoposts, 150, 400 & 600 nm diameter, Nanogratings, 150, 400 & 600 width | Higher ALP activity and higher expression of osteogenic markers in cells cultured on patterned surface compared to unpatterned PUA in presence of osteogenic medium | 83 |
hESCs | PDMS | Nanopillars, 35–400 nm diameter | Enhanced neuronal yield by increasing pillar height from 25–400 nm, ∼80% neuronal differentiation on higher pillar height in first 96 h in absence of biochemical factors | 87 |
Human primary osteoblast | PCL | Micropits, 300 nm depth, 20, 30 & 40 μm diameter | Osteogenic differentiation with most pronounce effect in 30 μm pits | 122 |
hMSCs | PDMS | Nanogratings, 250 nm depth, 250 nm width | Up-regulation of neurogenic and myogenic differentiation markers in hMSCs cultured on nanograting compared to microgratings and unpatterned | 92 |
hESCs | PCL | Nanopits, 100 nm depth, 120 nm diameter | Enhanced mesodermal differentiation in comparison with planar surface | 79 |
Nanotopographical features have been used to direct hMSCs differentiation particularly into an osteogenic lineage.32,81–83 Induction of osteogenic differentiation has been achieved by long-term culture of hMSCs on varying degree of disordered nanopits made from poly(methylmethylacrylate) (PMMA) in the absence of inducing signals, suggesting physical nanostructures might be sufficient to induce differentiation;32 However, enhanced osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs was achieved following induction of cultured hMSCs on surfaces with nanofeatures in combination with osteogenic medium suggesting optimal conditions can be achieved by using combinations of both physical cues and soluble factors.83 Work by Zouani et al. suggests that not only the width but also the depth of nanopatterns is important to elicit differentiation.84 These studies demonstrated that surface topography can be used to directly bias cell fate decisions.
Nanotopographic induction of differentiation towards other fates has also been investigated such as myogenic85 and neurogenic differentiation.80,86,87 Higher differentiation tendency toward neural lineages have been demonstrated in embryonic or adult stem cells cultured on engineered surfaces in various studies. One such example is the differentiation of hMSCs into neuronal-like cells following culture on nanograting of 350 nm width.80 Similar to You and colleagues’ observation,83 further enhancement of differentiation was achieved by the synergistic effect of both nanotopography and biochemical cues such as retinoic acid.80 In addition, enhanced neuronal differentiation have been reported in neuronal progenitors when co-cultured with astrocytes on micropatterns larger than 10 μm88,89 and electrospun polyamide nanofibers90 due to synergistic effects of soluble factors released by astrocytes. Although the molecular mechanism driving differentiation by nanotopography is largely unknown, recent studies suggested involvement of integrin-activated focal adhesion kinase.91,92
Nanotopographic features have also been investigated to encourage formation of multicellular structures with enhanced functionality. The importance of nanoscale cues in directing organization and function has been shown in human endothelial progenitor cells (hEPCs) cultured on both planar and nanograting substrates where hEPCs cultured on nanograting substrates formed multicellular band structures while cells cultured on planar substrate formed confluent monolayers.93 In a more recent study, it was demonstrated that endothelial cells (ECs) were aligned on both nanofibrillar and micropatterned channels, down-regulated adhesion proteins and chemokines and reduced adhesiveness to monocytes and platelets.94 Using a combination of electron beam and photolithography, a 3 layer tubular scaffold with a coaxial arrangement were fabricated which can be used as a vascular tissue engineering scaffold.95
Since the contractile property of cardiac tissue is directly related to cellular elongation and orientation, formation of anisotropic myocardium has also been investigated through various topographic features. In a pioneering study, faster propagation of action potential was observed in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes cultured on abraded microchannels on a poly(vinyl)chloride substrate.96 In another study, the effect of microtopography on intracellular calcium dynamics was investigated on cardiomyocytes cultured on a PDMS substrate with trapezoidal grooves with a depth of 50 μm and 120 μm spacing between adjacent triangular ridges.97 Increased diastolic and systolic intracellular calcium following electrical stimulation at higher and all stimulation frequencies, respectively, demonstrated that microstructure can directly influence cardiomyocytes intracellular calcium dynamics. To further investigate the influence of topography on functionality of cardiomyocytes, contractile forces generated by cardiomyocytes cultured on flat and a 10 μm-wide microcantilevers was measured in another study.98 Cells cultured on microcantilevers showed anisotropic actin organisation and had 65–85% higher contractile forces compared with flat surfaces. In addition, it was shown that expression of junctional markers such as N-cadherin and connexion-43 upregulated in presence of certain arrangements of micropillars, further suggesting enhancement of cardiomyocytes functionality by surface topography.99
Neural tissue engineering is another area, where topographical guidance has been utilised to further enhance functionality. Several approaches have been taken to fabricate conduits containing microchannels using various materials including PLGA and PCL.100,101 Moore et al. fabricated PLGA conduits with distinct channels running parallel along the length of the scaffold using injection moulding with rapid solvent evaporation.102 Krych et al. demonstrated that greater regeneration can be achieved following implantation of Schwann cell-seeded PLGA conduits with 450 μm over 600 μm diameter microchannels.103 Rutkowski and colleagues also demonstrated that improved functionality can be achieved following the introduction of grooves within lumens with a width of 10 μm, depth of 4.3 μm and spacing of 10 μm in rats with 1 cm sciatic nerve transections.104
It has been demonstrated that differentiation potential can be altered following chemical modification of surfaces (Table 7). The differentiation of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells was studied on a range of silane modified surfaces. –CH3 surfaces maintained the MSC phenotype. –NH2 and –SH modified surfaces promoted and maintained osteogenesis both in the presence and absence of biological stimuli.105 Human mesenchymal stem cells were cultured on polystyrene surfaces modified with photoreactive azidophenyl derivatives of three different chargeable polymers: poly(acrylic acid), polyallylamine and poly(ethylene glycol). The polyallylamine surface supported cell adhesion and proliferation and also promoted chondrogenic differentiation.106 The synthesis of sulphated glycosaminoglycan from bovine chondrocytes have been found to be highest on cationic PLGA microcarriers coated with PLGA-g-poly(L-lysine) graft copolymers compared with on hydrophobic and negatively charged PLGA, respectively.107 In addition, functional groups have been tethered to induce differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Primary amine, t-butyl, phosphate, tetrafluorobutyl and methacrylic acid functional groups containing methacrylates were incorporated into poly(ethylene glycol)dimethacrylate at sufficiently low concentration to study the effect of these small molecules on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Protein and gene expression altered by these molecules were analysed for stem cells cultured in the gels.108
Cell type | Material | Chemical modification | Functional outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
PAAc, poly(acrylic acid); PAAm, poly(allylamine); PEG, poly(ethylene glycol). | ||||
Myoblasts | Alginate | Covalent coupling | Adherence, proliferation, fusion and expression of heavy-chain myosin (a differentiation marker) following GRGDY modification of alginate surface | 123 |
Human osteoprogenitor | PDLLA & PLGA | Physical adsorption of RGD-poly(L-lysine) or fibronectin to PDLLA substrate | Enhanced adhesion and spreading following both modifications, successful osteogenic differentiation into mature osteogenic phenotype | 56 |
hECs | PLLA | Layer by layer assembly | Increased adhesion, proliferation and secretion of von Willebrand factor | 116 |
hMSCs | Glass | Surface entrapment | –NH2 and –SH-modified surfaces promoted and maintained osteogenesis, chondrogenic differentiation on –NH2-modified surface in presence of chondrogenic medium but not on –SH-modified surface, control and –CH3-modified surface maintained MSC phenotype but lack differentiation stimuli | 105 |
Rabbit ear chondrocytes | PLLA | Layer by layer assembly of chondroitin sulphate and collagen type-I onto PLLA | Improved cell attachment, proliferation, cytoviability and GAG secretion following introduction of chondroitin sulphate and collagen type I onto PLLA | 54 |
hMSCs | PAAc, PAAm & PEG | Physical coating | Negatively charged surface supported adhesion and proliferation while positively charged PAAm supported cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation, enhanced chondrogenic differentiation on PEG and PAAm-modified surface | 106 |
Table 8 summarises reports in which topography and chemistry were both controlled with the aim of controlling cell differentiation. For example Lie et al. demonstrated that not only adhesion of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts was enhanced on nano-fibrous gelatin scaffolds with in situ formed apatite, enhanced proliferation and differentiation were also observed following incorporation of apatite compared with nano-fibrous gelatine alone.109
Cell type | Material | Chemical modification | Physical modification | Functional outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts | Gelatine | in situ apatite formation | Nanofibre | Enhanced cell adhesion and proliferation, higher mechanical strength and enhanced osteoblastic differentiation following incorporation of apatite | 109 |
PC12 | PAA | Adsorption of BSA | Microwells (10 μm in diameter) connected by 1 μm microchannels | Selective attachment, growth and differentiation, control over number of neuritis outgrowth | 40 |
hMSCs | PET | Covalent immobilisation of –RGD peptide | Nanopits, 10–100 nm depth | Promotion of adhesion without noticeable differentiation on 10 nm, induced differentiation into osteoblast-like cells on 100 nm features | 84 |
In summarising the current literature it is apparent that there is a shortage of studies on the combined effects of chemistry and topography. In the body, most cells interact with surfaces arranged within a 3D architecture. The relationship between multiple surface-to-cell interactions and 3D space are essential in determining tissue patterning, repair or regeneration. The combination of topographical and chemical changes opens up a huge design space for new surfaces. This, in turn, requires high throughput and perhaps combinatorial mechanisms of creating surfaces and analysing their interactions with cells.
More mechanistic studies are required to shed light on the response of cells to surface properties. In most studies we measure single (or a small selection) of desirable functional outcomes. These outcomes can be achieved via multiple cellular pathways and understanding, and possibly controlling, these pathways through combined chemistry and topography will more closely mimic the role of the ECM.
Surface engineering methods should be attractive for clinical translation of synthetic scaffolds. The technologies reviewed here are generally inexpensive to use and from a regulatory perspective are scalable and easy to quantity control. Separating bulk and surface properties should allow enhancements in cell and tissue interaction without the need to redesign bulk properties.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 |