S.
Rtimi
a,
O.
Baghriche
a,
C.
Pulgarin
*a,
R.
Sanjines
b and
J.
Kiwi
*c
aEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL-SB-ISIC-GPAO, Station 6, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail: cesar.pulgarin@epfl.ch
bEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL-SB-IPMC-LNNME, Bat PH, Station 3, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland
cEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL-SB-ISIC-LPI, Bat Chimie, Station 6, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail: john.kiwi@epfl.ch
First published on 15th August 2012
Ti was sputtered in a plasma chamber under a N2 atmosphere, depositing TiN films on polyester fibers. These films show a significant adsorption in the visible spectral region. A TiN layer 50 nm thick sputtered for 3 min under low intensity/actinic visible light led to the fastest bacterial inactivation (120 min). These innovative TiN nanoparticulate films were characterized by XPS, DRS and TEM.
In the last decade, there has been increased interest in innovative antibacterial coatings due to the increasing resistance of pathogenic bacteria to antibiotics. Ag-films present acceptable adhesion and adequate bacterial inactivation kinetics along with favourable Ag-nanoparticle cell compatibility.5,6 But when washing textiles, some Ag leaches out and becomes an environmental problem.7,8 To avoid this environmental problem we investigated the bacterial inactivation by TiN films in this study since they do not contain Ag. Different antibacterial surfaces have been reported on textiles, glass, prostheses and catheters.9–13 Our laboratory has achieved bacterial inactivation on TiO2,14–16 Cu and Ag films.17–20
The objectives of this study are: a) to present the first report on the bactericide action of TiN-nanoparticle films activated by light in the visible range b) to explain the unexpected finding related the light induced activity of TiN films by XPS and c) to report on the dependence of the E. coli inactivation kinetics on the intensity/dose of the commercial actinic lights. TiN films on hospital textiles as suggested in this study should negate the spreading of toxic bacteria when irradiated under visible or actinic light.
The TiN film thickness was determined with a profilometer (Alphastep500, TENCOR). A film thickness of 50 nm was found for TiN-polyester after 3 min. Knowing the atomic distances of ∼0.3 nm we can estimate that one layer is 1015 atoms cm−2. The thickness of each layer is ∼0.2 nm thick,21 then it follows that for a layer 50 nm thick, the amount sputtered is 2.5 × 1017 atoms cm−2.
The polyester used corresponds to the EMPA test cloth sample No 407 Dacron polyethylene-terephthalate, type 54 spun, plain weave ISO 105-F04 used for color fastness determinations. The Ti sputtered on the polyester was evaluated by X-ray fluorescence (RFX, PANalytical PW2400).
The samples of Escherichia coli (E. coli K12) were obtained from the Zellkulturen GmbH (DSMZ) Braunschweig, Germany. The bacterial survival determination method has been recently reported.18,19 To verify that no re-growth of E. coli occurs after total inactivation, the TiN film was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Then bacterial suspensions of 100 microliters were deposited on 3 Petri dishes to obtain replica samples and the samples were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. No bacterial re-growth was observed.
The irradiation of the polyester samples was carried out in a cavity provided with tubular Osram Lumilux 18W/827 actinic lamps. These lamps have a visible emission spectrum between 400 and 700 nm with an integral output of 1.1 mW cm−2 resembling the light distribution found in solar irradiation. The bacterial inactivation kinetics is reported for diverse light intensities for both lamps.
XPS was carried out on an AXIS NOVA photoelectron spectrometer (Kratos Analytical, Manchester, UK). The surface atomic concentration was determined from the peak areas using sensitivity factors.22 The spectrum background was subtracted according to Shirley.23 The XPS peaks of the Ti-species were analyzed by spectra deconvolution software (CasaXPS-Vision 2, Kratos Analytical UK).
Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy was carried out using a Perkin Elmer Lambda 900 UV-VIS-NIR spectrometer provided for with a PELA-1000 accessory within the wavelength range of 200–800 nm and a resolution of one nm. The absorption of the samples was plotted in Kubelka-Munk (KM) arbitrary units vs. wavelength.
A Philips CM-12 (field emission gun, 300 kV, 0.17 nm resolution) microscope at 120 kV was used to measure the grain size of the TiN-films. The textiles were embedded in epoxy resin 45359 Fluka and the fabrics were cross-sectioned with an ultramicrotome (Ultracut E) and at a knife angle at 35°.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 E. coli survival on TiN-polyester sputtered for different times: (1) polyester alone, (2) TiN, 3 min in dark, (3) TiN, 1 min, (4) TiN, 1.5 min, (5) TiN, 10 min, (6) TiN, 5 min and (7) TiN, 3 min, irradiated with an Osram light (400–700 nm) L18W/827 (4 mW/cm2). Fig. 1b shows the E. coli survival percentage for TiN samples sputtered for different times, leading to a bacterial reduction of 3log10. |
Fig. 1a shows a progressively faster bacterial inactivation as the sputtering time increases from 1 to 3 min (traces 2, 3, 7). The amount of generated charges increases with a growing number of TiN layers up to a certain limit. At longer sputtering times, the bacterial inactivation in traces 5 and 6 (10 and 5 min respectively) slows down compared to the results presented in trace 7 (3 min). The increase in the TiN thickness hinders the free charge diffusion of carriers due to bulk inward diffusion.9,17 These charge carriers are responsible for electrostatic attraction with the bacteria. After 3 min sputtering time, the TiN coated polyester presents the highest amount of active sites/carriers in the TiN held in exposed positions leading to the shortest bacterial inactivation time. Fig. 1b shows the percentage decrease vs. time of the E. coli concentration for a bacterial reduction of 3log10. Fig. 1b, trace 1 shows that a 3 min TiN sputtered sample is able to inactivate 99.9% E. coli within 30 min in a kinetically fast process.
Fig. 2 shows the bacterial inactivation kinetics mediated by TiN-polyester samples under light irradiation from a visible light source, Osram 18W/827. It is readily seen that the bacterial inactivation is strongly dependent on the applied light dose in the reactor cavity. The inset of Fig. 2 shows the spectral distribution of the Osram light source used.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 E. coli survival on TiN polyester sputtered for 3 min and irradiated with a Lumilux Osram actinic light source (400–700 nm) 18W/827. |
Fig. 3a presents the evidence for TiO2 (Ti 2p3/2 doublet) formation on the polyester when sputtering TiN for 3 min. The peaks in Fig. 3a assigned to TiN and Ti2O3 (Ti3+ in the net sense)22 have been deconvoluted by the program cited in the Experimental section. The TiN species shows a peak at 455.62 eV, the Ti3+ doublet is seen at 456.22 eV the Ti4+ doublet at 458.43 eV. Fig. 3b) presents the XPS deconvoluted spectra for the TiN sample at the end of the bacterial inactivation process (120 min). The TiO2 (Ti2p3/2 doublet) BE is seen to shift to 459.01 eV. Shifts ≥ 0.2 eV are due to changes in the oxidation states of the species.23 This shift is due to a redox process taking place during bacterial inactivation involving the couple Ti4+/Ti3+ when oxidizing bacteria. The shift of the Ti2O3/Ti3+ doublet to 457.13 eV at 120 min reflects an increase in the reduced Ti3+-species at the end of the bacterial inactivation period. The surface atomic concentration of a TiN (3 min) sample at time zero was determined by XPS as: O1s 10.2%; Ti2p 44.7%; N1s 13.75% and C1s 22.31%.
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the TiN (3 min) in contact with bacteria for 3 s: a) at time = 0 min and b) at time = 120 min, showing the shift in the deconvoluted peaks after bacterial inactivation. |
Fig. 4 shows the diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS) of TiN sputtered for 1 and 3 min and for the polyester sample. The absorption of the TiN extends between 400 and 700 nm and a 0.34% Ti loading for the 3 min sputtered sample was determined by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF).
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 DRS of the TiN sputtered on polyester for: (1) TiN 1 min; (2) 3 min, and (3) polyester alone. |
Fig. 5 presents the TEM of: a) a polyester sample and b) a TiN sample sputtered on polyester for 3 min, presenting a width of 30–50 nm—equivalent to 150–250 TiN layers. By scanning transmission electron microscopy in high angular dark field imaging for TiN we found the N, Ti and O-atoms aligned in a continuous layer (data not shown). By X-ray diffraction (XRD) we attempted to determine the TiO2 crystallographic phase sputtered on polyester. This was not possible, due to the small amount of TiO2 sputtered on the polyester within 3 min.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of a) polyester sample alone (E: epoxide, P: polyester, b) for a TiN (3 min) polyester sputtered sample. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 |