Ho Yong
Lee
a,
Hae-Jo
Kim
a,
Kyoung Jae
Lee
b,
Myoung Soo
Lah
b and
Jong-In
Hong
*a
aDepartment of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-747, Korea. E-mail: jihong@snu.ac.kr; Fax: +82-2-889-1568; Tel: +82-2-880-6682
bDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Chemistry, College of Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Ansan, Kyunggi, Do 426-791, Korea. E-mail: mslah@hanyang.ac.kr
First published on 6th November 2006
We report the selective formation of a self-assembled discrete helical assembly with handedness through charged hydrogen bonds in aqueous solution and solid state. A helical assembly is obtained by simply mixing tris(imidazoline) (1) and (rac)-trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid (2) in a 2:
3 ratio in water and methanol. The formation of an ion aggregate is fully supported by NMR, MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy , and X-ray analysis. Helicity of the 2
:
3 complex is determined by the chirality of 2. For example, (1R,2R)-trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid (2RR) induces Mhelicity in [12·23] and vice versa. Each complex is enantiomerically pure as equal amounts of the P and M helical complexes are formed with racemic 2. P- and M-helical assemblies are stacked by turns because PMPM stacking is denser than PP or MM stacking.
Helicity is a fundamental aspect of the structure of natural biomolecules, such as the DNA double helix4 and proteins.5 Many artificial systems have been constructed for the purpose of mimicking natural helical structures using hydrogen bonds,6 metal coordination,7 and non-directional aromatic interaction.8 However, there are few reports about helical structures using charge-assisted hydrogen bonds. Herein we report the selective formation of a self-assembled helical discrete structure with handedness through charged hydrogen bonds in aqueous solution and solid state.
Recently, we reported the formation of a discrete ion aggregate in aqueous solvent composed of two tris(imidazoline) (1) bases9 and three tartaric acid units.10 However, it is likely that a 2:3 mixture of 1 and tartaric acid in aqueous solution can form not only a discrete dimeric assembly but also higher oligomeric species because the two carboxylate groups of tartaric acid salt exist not only in trans but also in gauche conformations.11Molecular modeling shows that any chiral dicarboxylic acid having the two acid groups only in a gauche relationship would serve as a discrete 2:
3 assembly inducing unit with handedness . Thus, we chose trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid (2) as the helicity inducing unit instead of tartaric acid because 2 with the two acid groups in diequatorial positions has the two carboxylic acid groups in a gauche relationship which are more or less aligned in the same direction. Therefore, 2 is expected to be better suited to the formation of a discrete 2
:
3 assembly. The pKa value (9.88) of protonated 1 is high enough for 1 to play a role as base. Thus, 1 can abstract protons from carboxylic acid. Strongly charged, directional hydrogen bonds between protonated 1 and deprotonated 2 would force both components to spontaneously form a discrete 2
:
3 aggregate.
![]() | ||
Scheme 1 |
Both 1 and 2 are poorly soluble in H2O. However, upon mixing with each other in H2O, the mixture becomes highly soluble. 1H NMR spectrum in D2O shows a highly symmetric one-set signal, suggesting the formation of a symmetric structure. The upfield shift of a chiral proton of 2 (2.65–2.37 ppm) and downfield shifts of aromatic and ethylene proton signals of 1 (8.25–8.60 ppm, 3.87–4.23 ppm) indicate that proton transfer has taken place between 1 and 2 (Fig. 1). The 1H NMR spectrum of the complex between racemic 2 and 1 is identical to that obtained from the 2RR complex (Fig. 2). This suggests that the complex from the racemic carboxylic acid ligand is a racemate of the chiral assembled structures. The stoichiometry of 1 and 2 was determined by the continuous variation plot (Job's plot, Fig. 3).12 Job's plot analysis in D2O indicates a 2:
3 stoichiometry between 1 and 2.
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 Job's plot between 1 and 2. Aromatic protons of 1 were monitored in 1H NMR spectra under the condition of [1] + [2] = 5.0 mM in D2O at 298 K. |
Complex [12·23] is also characterized by MALDI-TOF–MS spectrometry. The signals at m/z 1081.7 and 1105.1 are assigned to be [12·23·CO2]+ and [12·23·CO2·Na]+, respectively.
Evidence for the induced unidirectional helical structure comes from circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. The mixture of racemic 2 and 1 does not show any CD signal. Since 2RR has an intrinsic CD spectrum near the maxima of UV-vis absorbance of 1, an effective CD spectrum was obtained by subtracting the CD of 2RR from that of a 1 + 2 mixture. The CD intensity of 12·2RR3 at [2]/[1] = 8 shows about 1.1-fold enhancement (ΔA209nm = 33.0 mdeg cm–1) compared to 2RR only (ΔA209nm = 30.0 mdeg/cm). Thus, we can assume that this effective CD signal results solely from the induced helicity . We were not able to observe appreciable induced CD intensity above 250 nm because the extinction coefficient of 1 above 250 nm is relatively small.13
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 Crystal structure of M-[12·2RR3] (top) and P-[12·2SS3] (bottom). C (grey); O (red); N (blue); H (white). Hydrogen bonds are indicated in green dotted lines. All hydrogen atoms except for two hydrogen atoms in the imidazolinium group are omitted for clarity. |
Diastereomers of each complex were not observed. Once a chiral dicarboxylic acid binds two tris(imidazoline) ligands, a second dicarboxylic acid with the same chirality can easily bind because the two tris(imidazoline) ligands have already been twisted in one direction. Modeling structure of the arbitrary M-[12·2SS3] suggests a possible reason for the unidirectional helicity . The energy-minimized structure of M-[12·2SS3] forms only 9 hydrogen bonds between 1 and 2SS whereas P-[12·2SS3] forms 12 hydrogen bonds because of the unfavorable directionality of M-[12·2SS3] for hydrogen bonding interactions (Fig. 5).
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 Energy-minimized structure of M-[12·2SS3]. Conformational search was carried out with MacroModel 7.0 under Amber* force field in water. |
The two central benzene rings lie nearly parallel to each other with an interplane distance of 3.78 Å which results in an aromatic stacking interaction. One central benzene ring is unidirectionally twisted about 23° with respect to the adjacent ring. Two imidazolinium substructures are held together by three cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid (2) through twelve Coulombic hydrogen bonds. Bond length and angle of hydrogen bonding atoms are listed in Table 1. Presumably, π–π stacking of the central phenyl rings and the charged hydrogen bonds between carboxylate and imidazolinium are the major driving force for a spontaneous assembly of the 2:
3 mixture of 1 and 2 into a discrete helical assembly.
D–H⋯A | d(D–H) | d(H⋯A) | d(D⋯A) | ∠(DHA) |
---|---|---|---|---|
a Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #4 –x + y, –x + 1, z – 1 #5 –y + 1, x – y + 1, z – 1. | ||||
N(1)–H(1N)⋯O(2)#4 | 0.89(4) | 1.78(4) | 2.643(4) | 162(3) |
N(2)–H(2N)⋯O(1)#5 | 0.83(4) | 1.90(4) | 2.715(4) | 169(3) |
O(1S)–H(1S)⋯O(2) | 0.84 | 2.25 | 2.927(9) | 137.4 |
O(2S)–H(2S)⋯O(2) | 0.84 | 1.93 | 2.744(9) | 162.8 |
In addition to the crystal structure of the assembly itself, there are other interesting features resulting from its crystal-packing mode (Fig. 6). P-and M-helical assemblies are stacked by turns because PMPM stacking is denser than PP or MM stacking. For more efficient and energetically favorable packing of discrete assemblies, each imidazolinium ring of one assembly must be located in the center of two imidazolinium rings of the other assembly to minimize electrostaic repulsion and steric repulsion. And an imidazolinium ring is unidirectionally out of phase toward the central benzene ring because of the helicity of the assembly. PMPM stacking results in more efficient packing without steric repulsion between methylene hydrogens of the imidazolinium rings, while PP or MM stacking should lead to more steric repulsion. Therefore, while the formation of a discrete aggregate itself is a chiral self-recognition process, stacking of the 2:
3 assembly is a spontaneous hetero-recognition process. Crystals of 1 and 2RR mixture were obtained by diffusion of ether into ethanol solution. However, it is too unstable for performing X-ray analysis because MM stacking is less favored than MP stacking. Adjacent aggregates are distorted by 60° and separated by 3.57 Å which results in strong π–π stacking between discrete assemblies. Discrete aggregates with the same chirality exactly overlap, albeit there is no overlap between aggregates with opposite chirality. The PMPM type π–π stacking interaction of the 12·23 complex results in one-dimensional columnar structure with hydrophobic cyclohexyl groups at the columnar surface as shown in Fig. 6.
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 Crystal packing pattern of rac-[12·23] (010 view (left), 001 view (right)). C (grey); O (red); N (blue); H (white). Hydrogen bonds are indicated in green dotted lines. All hydrogen atoms except for two hydrogen atoms in the imidazolinium group are omitted for clarity. |
The hexagonal packing of the columns via inter-columnar hydrophobic interactions through cyclohexyl groups forms solvent channels along the crystallographic c-axis (Fig. 7). The disordered solvent methanols are packed in this solvent channel.
![]() | ||
Fig. 7 Crystal packing pattern of rac-[12·23] packing pattern without solvents (top), packing pattern with solvents (bottom)). C (grey); O (red); N (blue); H (white). Hydrogen bonds are indicated in green dotted lines. All hydrogen atoms except for two hydrogen atoms in the imidazolinium group are omitted for clarity. |
13C NMR (60 MHz in D2O): 185.6 (carbonyl), 164.6 ((NH)2C–Ar of 1), 132.2 (aromatic), 126.3 (aromatic), 104.9 (aliphatic), 49.8 (aliphatic), 45.9 (aliphatic), 30.0 (aliphatic), 25.8 (aliphatic).‡
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Further spectroscopic and crystallographic details (Fig. S1–S3, Tables S1–S6). See DOI: 10.1039/b610512b |
‡ Crystal data for rac-[12·23]: C60H96N12O18, Mr = 3041.80, colorless crystal 0.40 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm3, trigonal, I41/a, a = b = 27.5164(19) Å, c = 14.645(2) Å, V = 9629.2(17) Å3, Z = 6, ρcalcd = 1.318 Mg cm–3, F(000) = 4104, µ(Mo Kα, λ = 0.71073 Å) = 0.098 mm–1, T = 173(2) K, 2θmax = 56.60°. Structure solution and refinement of the structure were carried out using the SHELXTL-PLUS (5.03) software package (Sheldrick, G. M., Brukers Analytical X-Ray Division, Madison, WI, 1997). The structure was solved by a direct method and refined successfully in the space group R![]() |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007 |