Ultratrace determination of uranium and plutonium by nano-volume flow injection double-focusing sector field inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (nFI–ICP-SFMS)

Dirk Schaumlöffel b, Pierre Giusti b, Myroslav V. Zoriy a, Carola Pickhardt a, Joanna Szpunar b, Ryszard Łobiński bc and J. Sabine Becker *a
aCentral Division of Analytical Chemistry, Research Centre Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany. E-mail: s.becker@fz-juelich.de; Fax: +49 2461 612560; Tel: +492461 612698
bGroup of Bio-Inorganic Analytical Chemistry, CNRS UMR 5034, Hélioparc, 2, Av. Pr. Angot, F-64053 Pau, France
cDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-664 Warsaw, Poland

Received 27th July 2004 , Accepted 18th November 2004

First published on 3rd December 2004


Abstract

A sensitive analytical procedure based on nano-volume flow injection (FI) and inductively coupled plasma double-focusing sector field mass spectrometry (ICP-SFMS) was developed for the ultratrace determination of uranium and plutonium. A 54-nl sample was injected by means of a nanovolume injector into a continuous flow of carrier liquid at 7 μl min−1 prior to ICP-SFMS. The absolute detection limits were 9.1 × 10−17 g (3.8 × 10−19 mol, ∼230[hair space]000 238U atoms) and 1.5 × 10−17 g (6 × 10−20 mol, ∼38[hair space]000 242Pu atoms) for uranium and plutonium, respectively. The method was validated for the determination of the uranium isotope ratios by the analysis of a certified isotope reference material (NIST U350). The analysis of a contaminated urine sample showed the enriched uranium to be the origin of contamination. Another application concerned the determination of plutonium at the subfemtomolar level in water with a detection limit down to the ag ml−1 range (6 × 10−18 g ml−1).


Introduction

The characterization of highly radioactive nuclear materials and of radioactive waste for final storage with regard to long-lived radionuclides is a challenging area of analytical chemistry.1,2 The determination of ultratrace concentrations and precise isotope ratio measurements of uranium and plutonium is also required in environmental monitoring, nuclear forensic studies and health control. Isotope ratio measurements of uranium (e.g., of depleted uranium or the evidence of 236U) and plutonium in the environment or in body fluids can help distinguish different sources of nuclear contamination such as, for example, global fallout from nuclear weapons testing, nuclear power plants or nuclear accidents.3–6

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) has grown into a suitable analytical technique and a valid alternative to radioanalytical techniques for the determination of actinides owing to its high sensitivity and the possibility of isotope ratio measurements at the ultratrace level. In comparison with α-spectrometry smaller size samples can be analyzed by ICP-MS and the time-consuming and labor-intensive chemical separation and enrichment procedures can be largely reduced or eliminated. In addition, 239Pu and 240Pu isotopes, which are difficult to analyze by α-spectrometry due to the similar α energies of 239Pu and 240Pu (5.24 and 5.25 MeV, respectively), can be easily determined by ICP-MS in a separated plutonium fraction or when the uranium hydride formation (possible interference of 238U1H+ at 239Pu+) is eliminated.7,8 Thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (TIMS) has been used as the dominant analytical technique for precise isotope ratio measurements for many decades. Especially TIMS with multiple ion collectors is generally the method of choice for isotope ratio measurements with high precision (down to 0.002%).9 Nowadays, TIMS is more and more being replaced by ICP-MS due to the latter’s excellent sensitivity, precision and good accuracy for isotope ratio measurements with practically no restriction with respect to the ionisation potential of the element investigated.10 Furthermore, the efficiency of ICP-MS is significant higher than that of TIMS, because many samples can be measured in a short time at lower cost.

A rapidly growing field of trace element determination involves the analysis of micro- or nanolitre sample volumes which is of particular concern when an amount of few milligrams only of a rare, toxic or radioactive sample is available.11 Microanalytical techniques coupled with increasingly sensitive ICP-MS offer a new tool for the determination of radionuclides and their isotope ratios in radioactive materials in order to reduce the handled radioactivity, to minimize the radioactive waste of an analytical procedure, the irradiation dose of the operator or a possible contamination of instruments with radioactive substances.2 Sample introduction into ICP-MS using several types of micronebulizer operating at low uptake rates (10–100 μl min−1), such as MicroMist (Glass Expansion), a microconcentric nebulizer with desolvator (Aridus, CETAC)4,8 or the direct injection high efficiency nebulizer (DIHEN, Meinhard), was investigated for the determination of long-lived radionuclides in highly radioactive waste and in environmental or biomedical samples.12 These approaches suffer from a number of disadvantages. The analyzed sample volume still remains relatively high (e.g., 60 μl min−1 and 200 μl min−1 for the DIHEN and Micromist, respectively), the nebulization is usually not complete and a portion of the sample remains as radioactive waste, and the oxide formation rate is rather high.13

A remedy to these problems may be a further miniaturization of sample introduction into the ICP-MS, allowing the analysis of nanolitre sample volumes in such a way that 100% transport efficiency is achieved and dead volume minimized. The aim of this work is to develop a nanovolume (50-nl level) flow injection analysis using a total consumption nebulizer operating at uptake rates significantly below the 10 μl min−1 level. In terms of analytical performance the objectives set included (i) to obtain the lowest ever reported absolute detection limits for uranium and plutonium in the low attogram range and (ii) to demonstrate the feasibility of precise and accurate isotope ratio determination using short (<5 s) transient signals.

Experimental

Instrumentation

A double-focusing sector field ICP-MS (ICP-SFMS, ELEMENT, Finnigan MAT, Bremen, Germany) was used. The ICP torch was shielded with a grounded platinum electrode (GuardElectrode™, Finnigan MAT). Solution introduction into the ICP-SFMS was performed using a nano-volume flow injection with a microflow total consumption nebulizer DS-5 (CETAC, Omaha, NE, developed by Schaumlöffel et al.14) fitted in a low-dead-volume (8 cm3) single pass spray chamber. A low and constant carrier flow rate of 7 μl min−1 was provided by a high-precision syringe pump (CMA-100, Carnegie Medicine, Solna, Sweden). Nano-volume flow injection was achieved by an ultra-low dead volume nano-injection valve CN-2 (Valco Instruments, Houston, TX). The sample loop was an 8 cm long and 20 μm id fused silica capillary with an internal volume of 25 nl. Taking into account the internal port-to-port volume of the valve of 29 nl specified by the valve manufacturer, the total sample volume was 54 nl. All the tubing between the syringe pump, the injection valve and the nebulizer was made of 75 μm id fused silica capillaries. Zero-dead-volume connections were achieved by a precise flat cut of the fused silica capillaries which allowed the abutting of the capillaries in the fittings. The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. All measurements were performed under optimized conditions with respect to gas flow rates, rf power, torch position and ion lens settings, which are summarized in Table 1.
Experimental setup of nano-volume flow injection ICP-SFMS system.
Fig. 1 Experimental setup of nano-volume flow injection ICP-SFMS system.
Table 1 Optimized instrumental parameters of the nano-volume FI-ICP-SFMS system
Nebulizer DS-5
Spray chamber Low-dead volume, single pass, quartz
RF power/W 1200
Cooling gas flow rate/L min−1 18
Auxiliary gas flow rate/L min−1 1.2
Nebulizer (carrier) gas flow rate/L min−1 1.3
Solution uptake rate/μl min−1 7
Ion extraction lens potential/V −2000
Mass resolution, (mm) 300
Scanning mode Peak hopping


Standards and reagents

A laboratory standard solution of uranium (NBS 3164) with the natural isotopic abundance (1 ng ml−1) was used for optimization of the experimental parameters and the study of the oxide formation rates. The precision and accuracy of the 235U/238U isotope ratio measurement was examined using a NIST standard reference solution U350 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD) and a CCLU-500 (Laboratory Isotope Standard, Nuclear Research Center, Prague, Czech Republic)15 uranium solution with an isotopic 235U/238U ratio of 0.999[hair space]91. A NIST standard reference solution U020 was used for mass bias correction.

Five calibration standards solutions were prepared by dilution of 1 ng ml−1 aqueous uranium and 242Pu (NIST SRM 4334F) to 100, 200, 500, 800 and 1000 pg ml−1 of uranium and 1, 2, 5 10 and 30 pg ml−1 of plutonium. The solutions were diluted with high purity deionized water (18 MΩ cm), obtained from a Milli-Q-Plus water purifier (Millipore Billerica, MA).

All the chemicals used were of supragrade quality (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Nitric acid was further purified by sub-boiling distillation.

Samples and sample preparation

A contaminated urine sample collected from healthy adult volunteers in containers previously washed repeatedly with 2% v/v nitric acid was investigated. A 1-ml urine sample was microwave-digested and further preconcentrated to 180 μl by evaporation, resulting in a preconcentration factor of 5.6.

For the determination of plutonium a 10-L sample of tap water was acidified with nitric acid to pH 2, spiked with 4 pg of 242Pu and thoroughly mixed. Plutonium was co-precipitated in different steps with MnO2 and with Fe(OH)3 and finally separated using TEVA resin, resulting in a sample volume of 15 ml. This sample was further preconcentrated to 125 μl by evaporation, which resulted in a total preconcentration factor of 80[hair space]000, and analysed by nano-volume FI-ICP-MS.

Results and discussion

Optimization and performance of the nano-volume FI-ICP-SFMS system

The experimental parameters of the DS-5 nebulizer were optimized in respect of maximum ion intensity and minimum oxide of uranium formation rate by continuous flow introduction of a sample solution via a syringe pump at microlitre flow rates. The detection limits and the linearity were determined in the optimum conditions for uranium and plutonium in the flow-injection mode using a 54-nl injection loop.
Nebulizer performance. The effect of the ICP radiofrequency power on the sensitivity (Fig. 2(a)) is similar to other nebulizers (with a maximum sensitivity at about 1000 W) because the introduction of aqueous solution at the flow-rates characteristic of a DS-5 nebulizer does not influence the ICP. In contrast to other nebulizers, the ion intensity of uranium (238U+) measured as a function of the nebulizer gas flow rate (Fig. 2(b)) is practically constant in the 1.1–1.4 L min−1 range after an increase between 1.00 and 1.05 L min−1. This unique behavior indicates a complete evaporation of the introduced solution (virtually no aerosol present!) at nebulizer gas flow rates higher than 1.05 L min−1. The gas phase introduction results in a remarkable plasma stability because of the absence of cold-spots induced by larger aerosol droplets. Furthermore, complete evaporation and thus total consumption of the introduced solution by the DS-5 nebulizer was recently demonstrated elsewhere14 and is also confirmed by the linearity of the intensity response in the 2.5–7 μl min−1 range (Fig. 2(c)).
Effect of: (a) ICP rf power (nebulizer gas flow rate: 1.3 L min−1; sample uptake rate: 7 μl min−1); (b) nebulizer gas flow rate (rf power: 1200 W; sample uptake rate: 7 μl min−1); (c) sample uptake rate (rf power: 1200 W; nebulizer gas flow rate: 1.3 L min−1) on the sensitivity for uranium (238U+) in ICP-SFMS using the DS-5 nebulizer in the continuous flow sample introduction mode.
Fig. 2 Effect of: (a) ICP rf power (nebulizer gas flow rate: 1.3 L min−1; sample uptake rate: 7 μl min−1); (b) nebulizer gas flow rate (rf power: 1200 W; sample uptake rate: 7 μl min−1); (c) sample uptake rate (rf power: 1200 W; nebulizer gas flow rate: 1.3 L min−1) on the sensitivity for uranium (238U+) in ICP-SFMS using the DS-5 nebulizer in the continuous flow sample introduction mode.
Oxide formation rate. An important parameter of the quality of sample introduction into an ICP-MS is the level of oxide formation. The formation of oxide ions of long-lived radionuclides in ICP-MS using different nebulizers was studied by Becker and Dietze.16Fig. 3(a) shows a similar effect of the rf power on the oxide formation as for the Micromist nebulizer but at a twice lower level at low (<1.1 kW) rf power values. Owing to a gas-like sample introduction discussed above the oxide formation rate using the DS-5 nebulizer is less than 2% at the optimum operating conditions. This is significantly less than that of the DIHEN nebulizer13 and also of the MicroMist nebulizer.16 Contrary to the situation with the latter, this low oxide formation rate remains stable as a function of the nebulizer gas flow rate (Fig. 3(b)). The level of oxide formation also remains stable (between 0.7% and 1.4%) as a function of the sample uptake in the 2.5–7 μl min−1 range.
Comparison of the relative oxide formation rates for uranium in ICP-SF-MS using the DS-5 (bold line), the MicroMist (thin line) and the DIHEN (broken line) nebulizer: (a) effect of the ICP rf power (solution uptake rate DS-5: 7 μl min−1; Micromist: 85 μl min−1; DIHEN: 60 μl min−1); (b) effect of the nebulizer gas flow rate (solution uptake rate DS-5: 7 μl min−1; Micromist: 85 μl min−1; DIHEN: 60 μl min−1).
Fig. 3 Comparison of the relative oxide formation rates for uranium in ICP-SF-MS using the DS-5 (bold line), the MicroMist (thin line) and the DIHEN (broken line) nebulizer: (a) effect of the ICP rf power (solution uptake rate DS-5: 7 μl min−1; Micromist: 85 μl min−1; DIHEN: 60 μl min−1); (b) effect of the nebulizer gas flow rate (solution uptake rate DS-5: 7 μl min−1; Micromist: 85 μl min−1; DIHEN: 60 μl min−1).
Sensitivity. An important parameter to compare different nebulizers is the absolute sensitivity (number of counts per femtogram of analyte) obtained with the same ICP mass spectrometer. Table 2 summarizes the sensitivities reported for the different types of nebulizer for the uranium determination using double-focusing sector field ICP-MS. The outstanding performance of the DS-5 nebulizer can be explained by the high sample transport efficiency (total consumption) and high ionization efficiency (absence of aerosol). With the increasing solution uptake rate the absolute sensitivity of a nebulizer decreases because the portion of the sample lost to the waste increases and the degrading quality of the aerosol decreases the ionization. Only the Aridus nebulizer with desolvation shows a similar absolute sensitivity. The DIHEN nebulizer features the total sample consumption but the quality of aerosol at an uptake rate of 60 μl min−1 negatively affects the ionization efficiency and thus the absolute sensitivity.
Table 2 Comparison of the absolute sensitivity of different nebulizer types for 238U+ measured with ICP-SFMS
Nebulizer Solution uptake rate/ml min−1 Sample volume/ml Absolute sensitivity counts/fg −1 Ref.
a Using flow injection.
DS-5 0.007 0.0005a 2418 This work
q-DIHEN 0.06 0.12 1680 13
Aridus 0.1 0.2 2340 17
PFA 0.2 0.4 580 17
MicroMist 0.2 0.4 820 13
Meinhardt 1 2 97 13


Detection limits in the flow-injection mode

The insets in Fig. 4(a) and 4(b) show the transient signals of 238U+ and 242Pu+ for an injection of 54 nl of aqueous solutions containing 10 pg ml−1 (540 ag absolute) and 1 pg ml−1 (54 ag absolute), of uranium and 242Pu, respectively, and demonstrate the very high sensitivity of the nano-volume FI-ICP-SFMS developed. The calibration curves (Fig. 4(a) and 4(b)) are linear in the low femtogram range for 238U and in the subfemtogram range for 242Pu. The relative and absolute limits of detection for 238U and 242Pu measured with the developed nano-volume FI-ICP-SFMS system are summarized in Table 3. Whereas the concentration limits of detection in 54 nl sample volume were found to be 1.6 and 0.3 pg ml−1, the absolution detection limits were at 91 and 15 ag (10−18 g) for uranium and plutonium, respectively. The latter correspond to the number of atoms of ∼230[hair space]000 and ∼38[hair space]000 for uranium and 242Pu, respectively, and are, to our best knowledge, the lowest ever reported.
Calibration curves for the determination of: (a)
						238U and (b)
						242Pu, using nano-volume flow injection ICP-SFMS. The signals shown in the insets correspond to the injection (54 nl) of 10 ng L−1 uranium and 1 ng L−1 plutonium.
Fig. 4 Calibration curves for the determination of: (a) 238U and (b) 242Pu, using nano-volume flow injection ICP-SFMS. The signals shown in the insets correspond to the injection (54 nl) of 10 ng L−1 uranium and 1 ng L−1 plutonium.
Table 3 Relative and absolute detection limits for 238U and 242Pu measured with the developed nano-volume FI-ICP-SFMS system
  Relative detection limits Absolute detection limits Absolute detection limits Estimated number of atoms
  10−12 g ml−1 10−18 g 10−19 mol  
238U 1.6 91 3.8 ∼230000
242Pu 0.3 15 0.6 ∼38000


Uranium isotope ratio measurements by nano-volume FI-ICP-SFMS

The precision and accuracy for isotope ratio measurements of uranium measured by nFI-ICP-SFMS were studied for 10 repeated measurements using 100 pg ml−1 solutions of NIST U350 and CCLU-500 isotopic standard reference materials. Fig. 5 shows an example of the recorded results for the CCLU-500 isotope standard material with regard to 235U+, 238U+ and the 235U+/238U+ ratio. The precision of transient signal measurements on CCLU-500 laboratory standards (n = 10) was better than 2.5% (RSD).
Flow-injection signals of: (a)
						235U+ and (b)
						238U+ recorded for the analysis of the CCLU-500 isotope standard reference material; (c) the calculated 235U/238U isotopic ratio compared with the reference value.
Fig. 5 Flow-injection signals of: (a) 235U+ and (b) 238U+ recorded for the analysis of the CCLU-500 isotope standard reference material; (c) the calculated 235U/238U isotopic ratio compared with the reference value.

The results obtained for the NIST U350 material are summarized in Table 4. They demonstrate, considering the very small sample volume analyzed (54 nl), the excellent performance of nano-volume FI-ICP-SFMS. The precision of isotope ratio measurement increased with the decreasing of isotope ratio. The most accurate (RSD of 0.7%) value was measured for the 235U/238U ratio. The precision of the measurements of uranium isotope ratios in the NIST U350 material was in the low % range.

Table 4 Relative standard deviation and accuracy of uranium isotope ratio measurement in the NIST U350 material (10 injections)
  Experimental Certified Relative standard deviation (%) Accuracy (%)
235U/238U 0.546[hair space]974 0.546[hair space]488[hair space]00 2.3 0.7
234U/238U 0.003[hair space]703 0.003[hair space]879[hair space]00 3.2 −4.5
236U/238U 0.002[hair space]736 0.002[hair space]598[hair space]00 8.0 5.2


Determination of uranium isotope ratios in urine

The high sensitivity of the analytical procedure developed allowed the determination of the 235U/238U isotope ratio in a urine sample at the ultratrace level. In order to avoid clogging of the nebulizer, the sample was microwave digested. A blank run was performed prior to analysis. Owing to a very small injection volume (54 nl) in the FI mode matrix effects, such as clogging of the nebulizer capillary or deposits on the skimmer cone, were minimized, allowing the preconcentration by evaporation. The value obtained, 0.037 ± 0.005, was validated (the value obtained 0.048 ± 0.006) using a PFA-100 (Elemental Scientific, Inc., Omaha, NE, USA) nebulizer and continuous flow nebulization mode. The precision of both measurements is very similar, which demonstrates the feasibility of very short transient signal measurement with a sector field instrument. The comparison of the measured value with the natural 235U/238U isotope ratio (0.007[hair space]25) demonstrates unambiguously that the origin of contamination was enriched uranium.

Determination of plutonium in water

The analytical setup was applied to the determination of plutonium in tap water spiked with 242Pu at the subfemtomolar level. Plutonium was preconcentrated from a 10-l volume of water down to a volume of 125 μl (enrichment factor of 80[hair space]000) by a matrix separation and preconcentration procedure as described above. The concentration determined by nano-volume FI-ICP-SFMS was 230 ag per ml, which meant recovery at the 60% level. The detection limit of the overall procedure was 6 × 10−18 g ml−1 (6 ag ml−1), taking in account an enrichment factor of 80[hair space]000 and a recovery of 60%. Future studies on the applicability of this method to plutonium measurements in real samples are planned.

Conclusions

The nanolitre volume flow-injection analysis using a double focusing sector field ICP mass spectrometer offers the highest absolute sensitivity ever reported for uranium and plutonium. After analyte enrichment the detection limits of plutonium are in the ag ml−1 concentration range. The very small sample consumption indicates the potential of the method developed for the analysis of small amounts of rare, toxic or radioactive samples. The precision of isotope ratio determination can be further improved using multiple collector ICP mass spectrometry without any change in the sample introduction setup.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge R. Hille for financial support of this work and P. Ostapczuk (both from Department for Safety and Radiation Protection, Research Centre in Jülich) for helpful discussion. The support from the TOX-NUC and CNRS ACI NMAC programmes is acknowledged.

References

  1. R. Henry, D. Koller, M. Liezers, O. T. Farmer, C. Barinaga, D. W. Koppenaal and J. Wacker, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2001, 249, 103 CrossRef CAS.
  2. J. S. Becker, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 2003, 58, 1757 CrossRef.
  3. M. E. Ketterer, K. M. Hafer, C. L. Link, C. S. Royden and W. J. Hartsock, J. Environ. Radioact., 2003, 67, 191 CrossRef CAS.
  4. D. Desideri, M. A. Meli, C. Roselli, C. Testa, S. F. Boulyga and J. S. Becker, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2002, 374, 1091 CrossRef CAS.
  5. M. Betti, Microchem. J., 2000, 67, 363 CrossRef CAS.
  6. M. Agarande, S. Benzoubir, A. M. Neiva-Marques and P. Bouisset, J. Environ. Radioact., 2004, 72, 169 CrossRef CAS.
  7. R. N. Taylor, T. Warneke, J. A. Milton, I. W. Croudace, P. E. Warwick and R. W. Nesbitt, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2001, 16, 279 RSC.
  8. M. Zoriy, C. Pickhardt, P. Ostapczuk, R. Hille and J. Becker, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 2004 Search PubMed.
  9. I. T. Platzner, Modern Isotope Ratio Measurement, John Wiley, 1997 Search PubMed.
  10. J. S. Becker, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2002, 17, 1172 RSC.
  11. D. Schaumlöffel, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2004, 379, 351 CrossRef.
  12. J. S. Becker, H.-J. Dietze, J. A. McLean and A. Montaser, Anal. Chem., 1999, 71, 3077 CrossRef CAS.
  13. J. A. McLean, J. S. Becker, S. F. Boulyga, H. J. Dietze and A. Montaser, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 2001, 208, 193 CrossRef CAS.
  14. D. Schaumlöffel, J. Ruiz Encinar and R. Lobinski, Anal. Chem., 2003, 75, 6837 CrossRef.
  15. H.-J. Dietze, Berichte des Zentralinstitut fuer Isotopen und Strahlenforschung der Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR, 1979, vol. 27 Search PubMed.
  16. J. S. Becker and H.-J. Dietze, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 2000, 202, 69 CrossRef CAS.
  17. M. V. Zoriy, L. Halicz, M. E. Ketterer, C. Pickhardt, P. Ostapczuk and J. S. Becker, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2004, 19, 362 RSC.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.