Antimony is a fascinating element because of the antiquity of its discovery and use by man, its remarkable history in alchemy and early medicine, the number of modern industrial processes which employ Sb, the extremely broad range of high technology materials which contain it,1 and the diversity of its chemical behaviour.2,3 With respect to the predominant sources, biogeochemical behaviour and ultimate fate of Sb in the environment, there have been remarkably few studies compared to other potentially toxic metals such as Hg, Pb, Cd or As. The extensive review by Boyle and Jonasson4 outlined some of the gaps in our knowledge of the geochemical cycle of Sb. Since that time there has been growing evidence from a diversity of scientific disciplines that the environmental significance of Sb may have been underestimated by a considerable margin.5 There was an urgent need therefore, to bring together all of the scientists who are currently studying Sb in the environment under one roof, with representation invited from all of the relevant disciplines, to summarise the current state-of-the art of our understanding, and to identify the most important research needs: these were the objectives of the workshop.
According to the increasing concentrations, enrichments and accumulation rates of Sb in peat bogs from Europe and polar ice from the Canadian arctic, emissions of atmospheric Sb increased dramatically since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. The peat bogs show that emissions of Sb have largely evolved parallel to Pb since the Roman Period, indicating the intensity and long history of atmospheric Sb contamination. The snow pit and ice core from Devon Island provides the first complete time series for Sb in the arctic. The ratio of Sb to Sc shows that natural Sb inputs to the Arctic are dwarfed by industrial sources, and that the enrichments of Sb have been increasing during the past few decades. The magnitude of the Sb enrichments in snow and ice from a remote region of the arctic indicates that this element, like Pb and Hg, is a global contaminant. Analyses of aerosols from Tokyo show that Sb is now the most highly enriched trace element in the PM2.5 fraction, with similar enrichments found in Buenos Aires and other major cities.
In soils, adsorption of Sb(V) onto the surfaces of iron oxyhydroxides is an important geochemical sink for Sb. Methylation of Sb appears to be more important than previously believed, and occurs under both oxic and anoxic conditions. Roadway soils are measurably impacted by Sb from brake pads, and part of this anthropogenic Sb appears to be extractable, raising the question of bioavailability. Studies of Sb speciation in plants yield varying proportions of Sb(V), Sb(III) and trimethyl antimony indicative of both rapid and complex biogeochemical cycling from soil to plant.
Many questions remain about the rates and mechanisms of redox-related transformations of Sb in natural waters. With the development of clean lab methods and protocols developed for polar snow and ice, it is now possible to determine the natural abundance of Sb in pristine groundwater. Reports of Sb in bottled waters often show much greater concentrations, possibly because Sb2O3 is used as a clarifying agent in the manufacture of glass as well as a catalyst in the manufacture of PET.
Health effects caused by occupational exposure to antimony compounds can be difficult to discern because of the common association between Sb, Pb, and As. However, now that reliable methods are available for measuring Sb in blood, perhaps this can be developed into a monitoring tool to evaluate exposed and unexposed populations.
Given the diversity of commercial and industrial uses of Sb, the number of different sources of Sb to the environment, its dynamic behaviour and the potential toxicity of a number of Sb species, further, more detailed studies of the biogeochemical cycle of this remarkable element are certainly warranted. This journal is an excellent medium for reporting the latest findings. Don’t change that channel.
William Shotyk
Institute of Environmental Geochemistry,
University of Heidelberg,Germany
Michael Krachler
Institute of Environmental Geochemistry,
University of Heidelberg,Germany
Bin Chen
Department of Environmental Health Sciences,
School of Public Health, University of Michigan, USA
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005 |