Classical wet ashing versus microwave-assisted attacks for the determination of chromium in plants

Abstract

Microwave-assisted pre-treatments for the determination of Cr in plants are compared with classical wet-ashing procedures using open attacks in sand-baths. Four certified plant reference materials were analysed: pine needles (NIST SRM 1575), rye grass (BCR CRM 281), beech leaves (BCR CRM 100) and an aquatic plant (Trapa natans) (BCR CRM 596). The use of acidic procedures with HClO₄ or H₂SO₄ yielded different Cr results for these materials when classical wet-ashing procedures were used, as the use of HClO₄ caused losses of volatile chromium compounds. The shorter time of analysis required (60 min) in open-focused microwave-assisted attack allows the use of HClO₄ for obtaining results very close to the certified values for CRM plant materials. This type of microwave digestion also led to good reproducibility values with relative standard deviations between 5 and 10%.

References

1. J. W. Moore, in Inorganic Contaminants of Surface Water. Research and Monitoring Priorities, ed. R. S. De Santo, Springer, New York, 1991, ch. 9, pp. 82–97.
2. R. Rubio, A. Sahuquillo, G. Rauret and Ph. Quevauviller, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., 1992, 47, 99.
3. A. Sahuquillo, J. F. López-Sánchez, R. Rubio and G. Rauret, Mikrochim. Acta, 1995, 119, 251.
4. Ph. Quevauviller, J. G. Van Raaphorst and H. Muntau, Trends Anal. Chem., 1996, 15, 259.
5. S. Wu, X. Feng and A. Wittmeier, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1997, 12, 797.
6. F. E. Smith, Talanta, 1996, 43, 1207.
7. J. G. Van Raaphorst, Ph. Quevauviller and H. Muntau., The Certification of the Mass Fraction of Chromium in Rye Grass (CRM 281), Beech Leaves (CRM 100), Aquatic Plant (Trapa Natans)(CRM 596), Fly Ash (CRM 038) and Sewage Sludge (CRM 597), EUR 16840 EN Report, European Commission BCR Information. Reference Materials, Brussels, 1996.
8. R. E. Sturgeon, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 1997, 52, 1451.
9. A. Carlosena, M. Gallego and M. Valcárcel, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1997, 12, 479.
10. I. Kubrakova, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 1997, 52, 1469.
11. M. J. T. Carrondo, R. Perry and J. N. Lester, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1979, 106, 309.
12. M. Burguera and J. L. Burguera, Quim. Anal., 1996, 15, 112.
13. R. Chakraborty, A. K. Das, M. L. Cervera and M. de la Guardia, Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem., 1996, 355, 99.
14. A. Sinquin, T. Görner and E. Dellacherie, Analusis, 1993, 21, 1.
15. D. H. Sun, J. K. Waters and T. P. Mawhinney, J. AOAC Int., 1997, 80, 647.
16. I. V. Kubrakova, T. F. Kudinova, E. B. Stavnivenko and N. M. Kuz'min, J. Anal.Chem., 1997, 52, 522.
17. R. Chakraborty, A. K. Das, M. L. Cervera and M. de la Guardia, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1995, 10, 353.
18. J. R. Moody, Anal. Chem., 1982, 54, 1358A.
19. Report of Verification and Control of Clean Laboratories, Sociedad de Validación de Sistemas (SVS), Sant Cugat, Barcelona, 1998.
20. Certificate of Analysis of SRM 1575 (Pine Needles), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1993.
21. M. Hoenig and A. M. de Kersabiec, L'Atomisation Électrothermique en Spectrométrie d'Absorption Atomique, Masson, Paris, 1989, pp. 137–165.
22. A. Sahuquillo, R. Rubio and G. Rauret, in Quality Assurance for Environmental Analysis, ed. Ph. Quevauviller, E. A. Maier and B. Griepink, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995, pp. 39–62.