Issue 1, 1999

Classical wet ashing versus microwave-assisted attacks for the determination of chromium in plants

Abstract

Microwave-assisted pre-treatments for the determination of Cr in plants are compared with classical wet-ashing procedures using open attacks in sand-baths. Four certified plant reference materials were analysed: pine needles (NIST SRM 1575), rye grass (BCR CRM 281), beech leaves (BCR CRM 100) and an aquatic plant (Trapa natans) (BCR CRM 596). The use of acidic procedures with HClO4 or H2SO4 yielded different Cr results for these materials when classical wet-ashing procedures were used, as the use of HClO4 caused losses of volatile chromium compounds. The shorter time of analysis required (60 min) in open-focused microwave-assisted attack allows the use of HClO4 for obtaining results very close to the certified values for CRM plant materials. This type of microwave digestion also led to good reproducibility values with relative standard deviations between 5 and 10%.

Article information

Article type
Paper

Analyst, 1999,124, 1-4

Classical wet ashing versus microwave-assisted attacks for the determination of chromium in plants

A. Sahuquillo, R. Rubio and G. Rauret, Analyst, 1999, 124, 1 DOI: 10.1039/A808659A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements