Issue 19, 2020

Fate of urea-15N as influenced by different irrigation modes

Abstract

Fertilizer nitrogen (N) is a main pollutant in the agricultural ecosystem, while the fate of fertilizer N influenced by different irrigation modes is not well comparatively investigated. In this study, the distribution of fertilizer N in soil layers and tomato organs as well as its loss under drip, spray and flood irrigation with different quotas of 140, 180 and 220 m3 ha−1 were evaluated quantitatively by using nitrogen-15 (15N) labeled urea (abundance of 19.6%) as fertilizer source. The results showed that the plant 15N, soil 15N and 15N loss accounted for 27.9–47.8%, 38.8–54.0% and 10.3–21.9% of the total applied 15N, respectively. The amount of 15N absorbed by plants was significantly (p < 0.05) higher under drip and spray irrigation in comparison to flood irrigation with the same irrigation quota. The maximum 15N use efficiency and the minimum 15N residual were detected under drip irrigation with quota of 180 m3 ha−1, indicating that the supply and demand of urea-15N was more synchronized under such an irrigation mode. The 15N loss increased obviously as irrigation quota increased. Moreover, the correlation analysis between 15N loss and the possible impact factors indicated that the soil mineral 15N content after irrigation was one important factor influencing the 15N loss. Among the three irrigation modes, spray irrigation caused the lowest 15N loss of 10.3–13.1% when using the same irrigation quota. It was concluded that the irrigation modes have profound impacts on the fate of urea-15N. Irrigation could be used as a regulation pathway of plant N absorption and agricultural N output.

Graphical abstract: Fate of urea-15N as influenced by different irrigation modes

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
01 Jan 2020
Accepted
11 Mar 2020
First published
18 Mar 2020
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY-NC license

RSC Adv., 2020,10, 11317-11324

Fate of urea-15N as influenced by different irrigation modes

X. Ru, C. Jingnan, L. Zhiyuan, C. Xieyong, H. Maomao, S. Shanshan, J. Qiu and Z. Fenglin, RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 11317 DOI: 10.1039/D0RA00002G

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications, without requesting further permission from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.

To request permission to reproduce material from this article in a commercial publication, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party commercial publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements