Issue 42, 2019

Evaluation of two extraction approaches for pesticide residue determination in biobeds using GC-MS/MS

Abstract

The development of reliable and accurate analytical methods is a requirement to ensure biobed bioremediation capacity. In this study two extraction approaches were evaluated for the determination of captan (and its degradation product, tetrahydrophthalimide), chlorothalonil, chlorpyrifos-ethyl, fenitrothion, methidathion, phosmet and tebuconazole in biobeds. These pesticides were selected because of their importance for apple plantations and the biobeds were used for bioremediation of pesticide wastes sprayed on plantations. After some preliminary experiments, the best extraction approach was selected and subjected to a complete validation study as advised by the SANTE Guidance Document. The validated approach consists of an optimized version of the Dutch mini-Luke method and is performed in only 4 steps (extraction, phase partitioning, centrifugation and filtration), which makes it very convenient and attractive. Linearity of analytical curves (r2), residuals, limits of detection (LODs) and quantification (LOQs), matrix effects (%), accuracy (in recovery%) and precision (as repeatability and reproducibility – relative standard deviation, RSDr and RSDwR, respectively) were assessed. Two internal standards were used for quality control. Validation studies were performed by analyzing blank biobed samples spiked at 50, 100 and 200 μg kg−1 (n = 7) which yielded average recoveries from 75 to 117% and RSDr ≤ 14%. The analytical curves obtained from matrix-matched standards were linear (r2 ≥ 0.987) in the concentration range of 10 (or 20) to 300 μg L−1 for all compounds, except for captan which was not detected in the validation study. LOQs were equal to 50 μg kg−1. The calculated matrix effects were ≥±20%.

Graphical abstract: Evaluation of two extraction approaches for pesticide residue determination in biobeds using GC-MS/MS

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
14 Aug 2019
Accepted
21 Sep 2019
First published
27 Sep 2019

Anal. Methods, 2019,11, 5455-5463

Evaluation of two extraction approaches for pesticide residue determination in biobeds using GC-MS/MS

C. S. Vareli, I. R. Pizzutti, L. Gebler, C. D. Cardoso, M. E. Z. Fontana, B. Reichert and B. D. Jänisch, Anal. Methods, 2019, 11, 5455 DOI: 10.1039/C9AY01746A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements