Issue 22, 2013

Multi-family methodologies for the analysis of veterinary pharmaceutical compounds in sediment and sludge samples: comparison among extraction techniques

Abstract

Veterinary drugs are still poorly studied in terms of pathways, release rates and effects on the environment. So, it is necessary to determine their levels in sewage sludge and soil/sediments affected by wastewaters. However, published methodologies deal usually with compounds from only a few classes. In addition, there is a lack of comparisons among the different extraction technologies used. A multi-family methodology for the simultaneous determination of minocycline, oxytetracycline, tetracycline (tetracyclines), enrofloxacin (fluoroquinolone) and ceftiofur (cephalosporin) in sludge and sediment was pursued. Three extraction techniques were compared, vortex agitation, ultrasonic extraction (USE) and microwave assisted extraction. Introduction of solid-phase extraction (SPE) for sample clean-up and pre-concentration was also evaluated. The complex matrix of solid samples posed specific problems, implying the need for individualized approaches for sediments and sludge. For sediments, USE sequential extraction (2 cycles) with methanol–acetone was chosen. LODs, when using SPE, ranged from 0.009 to 0.02 μg g−1. For sludge, samples were sequentially extracted three times by USE with methanol–formic acid. The SPE allowed lowering the limits 10 times ranging from 0.08 to 0.3 μg g−1 for LODs. The method yielded good selectivity and acceptable recovery results. The present methodology resulted in suitable multi-family approaches, less common than the majority of similar processes published.

Graphical abstract: Multi-family methodologies for the analysis of veterinary pharmaceutical compounds in sediment and sludge samples: comparison among extraction techniques

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
05 Aug 2013
Accepted
12 Sep 2013
First published
13 Sep 2013

Anal. Methods, 2013,5, 6503-6510

Multi-family methodologies for the analysis of veterinary pharmaceutical compounds in sediment and sludge samples: comparison among extraction techniques

P. N. Carvalho, A. Pirra, M. C. P. Basto and C. M. R. Almeida, Anal. Methods, 2013, 5, 6503 DOI: 10.1039/C3AY41339J

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements