Issue 6, 2005

6-endo or not 6-endo, that is the question: correcting an erroneous structural assignment and mechanistic presumption

Abstract

Careful reading of a published article uncovered a specious structural assignment, which has so far remained unchallenged. An alternate structure has been suggested and the experimental procedure repeated. Subsequently, a more rigorous analytical characterization confirmed the true structure to be a cyclic dimer of the structure proposed in the original paper, thereby negating their singular claim of an otherwise unobserved type of 6-endo cyclization.

Graphical abstract: 6-endo or not 6-endo, that is the question: correcting an erroneous structural assignment and mechanistic presumption

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
02 Dec 2004
Accepted
28 Feb 2005
First published
15 Apr 2005

New J. Chem., 2005,29, 789-791

6-endo or not 6-endo, that is the question: correcting an erroneous structural assignment and mechanistic presumption

J. Tamine and C. Wang, New J. Chem., 2005, 29, 789 DOI: 10.1039/B418256A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements