Issue 16, 2015

Reply to the ‘Comment on “How to interpret Onsager cross terms in mixed ionic electronic conductors”’ by H.-I. Yoo, M. Martin, and J. Janek, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 7, DOI: 10.1039/C4CP05737F

Abstract

The origin of the Onsager cross terms in mixed-ionic–electronic-conductor (MIEC) oxides is re-examined. Experiments are suggested to determine which of the two suggested explanations is applicable.

Graphical abstract: Reply to the ‘Comment on “How to interpret Onsager cross terms in mixed ionic electronic conductors”’ by H.-I. Yoo, M. Martin, and J. Janek, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 7, DOI: 10.1039/C4CP05737F

Associated articles

Article information

Article type
Comment
Submitted
11 Feb 2015
Accepted
04 Mar 2015
First published
04 Mar 2015

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015,17, 11107-11108

Author version available

Reply to the ‘Comment on “How to interpret Onsager cross terms in mixed ionic electronic conductors”’ by H.-I. Yoo, M. Martin, and J. Janek, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 7, DOI: 10.1039/C4CP05737F

I. Riess, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 11107 DOI: 10.1039/C5CP00879D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements