Wing Kin
Chow
,
Chau Ming
So
,
Chak Po
Lau
and
Fuk Yee
Kwong
*
State Key Laboratory of Chirosciences, Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong. E-mail: fuk-yee.kwong@polyu.edu.hk
First published on 17th April 2014
The deoxygenation of tosylated arenes catalyzed by a palladium complex is described. This method represents one of the first general examples of reductive C–O bond cleavage of aryl tosylates via palladium catalysis. By simply employing isopropanol as a mild reducing agent, a variety of tosylated arenes can be smoothly reduced. Labelling experiments revealed that the H source is isopropanol.
![]() | ||
| Scheme 1 Selected pharmaceutical examples of using sulfonated precursors in deoxygenation/reduction reaction. | ||
New catalyst systems have emerged allowing for more challenging aryl sulfonates to be employed in this deoxygenation reaction.7,8 Aryl tosylates could be deoxygenated through the mediation of stoichiometric amounts of NiCl2–NaBH4 or RANEY®-Ni/NaOH/H2 (5 atm) systems.9 Sasaki achieved the reduction of aryl mesylate using NiBr2(Ph3P)2/dppp as the catalyst, zinc as the reductant and methanol as the hydrogen donor.10 Lipshutz disclosed that nickel-on-graphite-Ph3P (Ni/Cg/Ph3P) associated with Me2NH·BH3 facilitated the catalytic reduction of aryl tosylates and mesylates.11 Benzothiazole or –CN group-containing substrates were found not to be compatible with the established reaction conditions. Sajiki reported that 10 mol% of Pd/C with a stoichiometric amount of Mg and NH4OAc under MeOH promoted the single electron transfer (SET) reductive cleavage of aryl mesylates.12 Yet, in this system, aryl tosylate did not react. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no literature report describing the general palladium-catalysed reductive cleavage of aryl tosylates. Herein, we report a catalytic system, employing isopropanol as the H donor and featuring good functional compatibility, for the facile deoxygenation of tosylated arenes.
We initially tested the feasibility of the reductive cleavage using our developed Pd/CM-Phos system (Table 1).13 Non-activated 4-tert-butylphenyl tosylate was chosen as the prototypical substrate for the deoxygenation reaction. A survey of commonly used inorganic bases revealed that K3PO4 and K2CO3 gave the best results (entries 1–2 and 5). Strong bases, e.g. NaOt-Bu, led to hydrolysis of the aryl tosylate and significant amounts of phenolic side products were observed (entry 3). Organic bases such as i-Pr2EtN and Et3N did not promote the reaction (entries 6–7). Solvent screening indicated that i-PrOH was the solvent of choice (entries 1 vs. 8–11). In fact, i-PrOH serves as both the solvent and the hydrogen donor in this reaction.
| Entry | Solvent | Base | Temp. (°C) | Yieldb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a Reaction conditions: ArOTs (1.0 mmol), base (3.0 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (0.005 mmol, 0.5 mol%), CM-phos (0.02 mmol), solvent (3.0 mL) were stirred for 2 hours at the indicated temperature under nitrogen. b Calibrated GC yields were reported using dodecane as the internal standard. c Significant amount of phenolic product was observed. | ||||
| 1 | i-PrOH | K3PO4 | 90 | 88 |
| 2 | i-PrOH | K2CO3 | 90 | 78 |
| 3 | i-PrOH | NaOt-Bu | 90 | 7c |
| 4 | i-PrOH | Na3PO4 | 90 | 18 |
| 5 | i-PrOH | K3PO4·H2O | 90 | 85 |
| 6 | i-PrOH | i-Pr2EtN | 90 | Trace |
| 7 | i-PrOH | Et3N | 90 | Trace |
| 8 | MeOH | K3PO4 | 90 | 4 |
| 9 | EtOH | K3PO4 | 90 | 3 |
| 10 | t-BuOH | K3PO4 | 90 | Trace |
| 11 | t-AmOH | K3PO4 | 90 | 12 |
| 12 | i-PrOH | K3PO4 | 70 | 54 |
| 13 | i-PrOH | K3PO4 | 50 | Trace |
| 14 | i-PrOH | K3PO4 | r.t. | N.R. |
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand,14 we next investigated the scope of aryl tosylates in the deoxygenation reaction (Table 2). In general, this transformation proceeded well at 90 °C in 2 h. These mild reaction conditions tolerated keto, ester, nitrile and benzothiazolyl groups (entries 3–9), whereas other reducing agents were not fully compatible with them.15 To expand the substrate scope further, we tested the sterically hindered aryl tosylates (entries 8–10). To the best of our knowledge, there has been no successful example reported to date using 2,6-disubstituted aryl tosylates in a deoxygenation reaction. The electron-rich substrate screened (entry 12) was reduced smoothly.
| Entry | ArOTs | ArH | mol% Pd (time) | % Yieldb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: ArOTs (1.0 mmol), K2CO3 (3.0 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (0.005–0.04 mmol, 0.5–4.0 mol%), CM-phos (Pd : L = 1 : 4) and i-PrOH (3.0 mL) were stirred at 90 °C for the indicated time under nitrogen.
b Isolated yield.
c Reactions were performed at 110 °C.
d Only determined by GC-FID, yield calculated according to GC-FID using authentic sample calibration.
|
||||
| 1 |
|
|
0.5 (2 h) | 82 |
| 2 |
|
|
1.0 (2 h) | 81 |
| 3 |
|
|
0.5 (2 h) | 81 |
| 4 |
|
|
0.5 (2 h) | 82 |
| 5 |
|
|
1.0 (2 h) | 86 |
| 6 |
|
|
1.0 (2 h) | 86 |
| 7 |
|
|
2.0 (2 h) | 86 |
| 8c |
|
|
2.0 (24 h) | 82 |
| 9c |
|
|
2.0 (24 h) | 82 |
| 10c |
|
|
4.0 (24 h) | 72d |
| 11 |
|
|
2.0 (2 h) | 77 |
| 12 |
|
|
1.0 (2 h) | 70d |
In order to investigate the identity of the H source under these reaction conditions, we performed a labelling experiment (Scheme 2). Ethyl 4-tosylbenzoate was deoxygenated in deuterated isopropanol. The corresponding deuterated product was obtained in 76% yield (Scheme 2A). Moreover, we attempted to carry out the experiment under the i-PrOH–D2O conditions (Scheme 2B). These results unambiguously confirmed the H-source is not from the –OH group of isopropanol.
The proposed mechanism is shown in Scheme 3. Aryl tosylate is oxidatively added to the palladium complex.16 Abstraction of TsOH by inorganic base generates an isopropoxy–palladium species. This intermediate undergoes β-hydride elimination to afford the corresponding aryl–palladium–hydride complex. Reductive elimination gives the deoxygenated product and regenerates the palladium catalyst.
:
L = 1
:
4, Pd loading as indicated) were loaded into a Schlenk tube (30 mL) equipped with a Teflon-coated magnetic stir bar (4 × 10 mm). The tube was evacuated and flushed with nitrogen for three times. Precomplexation was achieved by adding freshly distilled dichloromethane (∼1 mL) and Et3N (100 μL) into the tube. The solution was stirred and warmed using a hair drier for about 1 to 2 minutes until the solvent started boiling. The solvent was then evaporated under a high vacuum. Aryl tosylates (1.0 mmol) and K2CO3 (3.0 mmol) were loaded into the tube, and the system was further evacuated and flushed with nitrogen for three times. Isopropanol (3.0 mL) was then added. The tube was stirred at room temperature for several minutes and then placed into a preheated oil bath (90 °C) for the time period as indicated in the above tables. After completion of reaction as judged by GC analysis, the reaction tube was allowed to cool to room temperature and quenched with water and diluted with EtOAc. The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer was washed with EtOAc. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude products were purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (230–400 mesh) to afford the desired product.
Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Detailed experimental procedures and spectral data. See DOI: 10.1039/c4qo00103f |
| This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2014 |