Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Correction: Eu2+–Eu3+ valence transition in double, Eu-, and Na-doped PbSe from transport, magnetic, and electronic structure studies

Bartlomiej Wiendlocha *ab, SunPhil Kim b, Yeseul Lee c, Bin He b, Gloria Lehr d, Mercouri G. Kanatzidis c, Donald T. Morelli d and Joseph P. Heremans be
aFaculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Aleja A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland. E-mail: wiendlocha@fis.agh.edu.pl
bDepartment of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
cDepartment of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
dDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
eDepartment of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

Received 5th June 2017 , Accepted 5th June 2017

First published on 12th June 2017


Correction for ‘Eu2+–Eu3+ valence transition in double, Eu-, and Na-doped PbSe from transport, magnetic, and electronic structure studies’ by Bartlomiej Wiendlocha et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 9606–9616.


The authors have identified an error in the chemical formula of the sample given in the labels and description of Fig. 4c and d. These two figures show magnetization measurements for the Pb1−xyEuxNaySe sample, with x = 0.03 and y = 0.01. The corrected sentence (page 9611, second paragraph), referring to this figure, should read: “The increase in Eu level in PbSe results in a larger deviation from MBR as seen in Fig. 4c for the (x = 0.03, y = 0.01) sample.” The corrected version of Fig. 4 is shown below.
image file: c7cp90127e-f1.tif
Fig. 4 Magnetization of two Pb1−xyEuxNaySe samples as a function of magnetic field. Solid lines in panels (a) and (c) are the curves of the calculated magnetization with Brillouin function (without corrections for the AF interaction). Solid lines in panels (b) and (d) are model (MAF_BR) curves that consider AF contributions of pairs and triplets to the magnetization. The much better agreement between the measured data and models on panels (b) and (d) versus (a) and (c) is clearly visible.

In addition, in eqn (4), the Brillouin function should have the index S, BS(ξ), instead of J, BJ(ξ), which is present in the original paper.

The authors apologise for these errors.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.


This journal is © the Owner Societies 2017