Lauren E.
Hatcher
* and
Paul R.
Raithby
Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. E-mail: l.e.hatcher@bath.ac.uk
First published on 11th September 2017
Two crystal systems: [Pd(Et4dien)(NO2)]OTf [1] and [Pt(Et4dien)(NO2)]OTf [2] (Et4dien = N,N,N′,N′-tetraethyldiethylene-triamine, OTf = trifluoromethanesulfonate) are investigated by steady-state photocrystallographic methods. Both structures contain intermolecular hydrogen bonds to the ground state nitro-(η1-NO2) isomer, which are previously shown to limit the achievable level of nitro → nitrito photo-conversion. Irradiation at 100 K induces a mixture of endo-ONO and exo-ONO isomers in 1 and 2, with overall incomplete photo-activation. In contrast, irradiation at higher temperatures leads to much higher conversion, with 100% excitation in 1 at 150 K. The results show that the detrimental effects of hydrogen bonding on the photo-reaction are overcome at higher temperature, adding a new dimension of control to the isomerisation process.
For many decades it has been known that organometallic systems containing ambidentate ligands exist as one of several, structurally distinct linkage isomers.1 Photo-switching between linkage isomers can be achieved in both solution and the solid-state, with irradiation of the solid leading to the production of a metastable state (MS) isomer below some critical temperature.2In situ photocrystallographic studies have to-date revealed the structures of various MS linkage isomers, including nitrosyl,3,4 nitrite,5–8 sulfur dioxide,9–11 and di-nitrogen12 systems.
Early photocrystallographic studies involving metastable linkage isomers were limited by low levels of photo-activation in the single-crystal.11,13 However, in 2009 the first system to undergo 100% photo-switching between a ground state (GS) nitro-(η1-NO2) and a MS endo-nitrito-(η1-ONO) isomer was reported.7 Since then, we have reported a number of metal–nitrite systems capable of achieving very high levels of photo-induced linkage isomer conversion, designed on the basis of a simple crystal engineering principle. These systems include large, sterically-demanding ancillary fragments in the crystalline array, which are all photo-inert. These static, bulky components can then dominate the crystal packing and define a suitable “reaction cavity” around the potentially isomerisable nitrite group.14,15 Photo-switching can then proceed to a high level within this cavity, without imparting undue strain to the rest of the crystalline array that may otherwise inhibit high conversion.
The successful implementation of this simple crystal engineering principle highlights the important influence that the surrounding crystalline environment has on the photo-switching process. Each molecule in a crystal is involved in a complicated array of intermolecular interactions, which have the potential to both assist and hinder linkage isomerism. In particular, strong-to-moderate intermolecular hydrogen bonds, involving the nitro-(η1-NO2) group in the ground state (GS), are shown to have a detrimental effect on the maximum level of photo-conversion that can be achieved. An example is [Ni(MeDPT)(NO2)2], which contains two, crystallographically distinct nitro-(η1-NO2) environments in its GS structure.16 One NO2 group participates in no significant hydrogen bonding and is found to reach 89% photo-activation in the excited state (ES). By contrast, a conversion level of just 32% is achieved at the second NO2 position, which is bound by moderately strong hydrogen bonds through both of its oxygen atoms.16 This result suggests that, when designing new linkage isomer switches, fragments containing hydrogen bond donor groups should be avoided. This would be an unfortunate design limitation, given that hydrogen bonds are traditionally one of crystal engineering's most important and useful tools.17 Avoiding their presence completely makes the rational design of new photo-switchable crystal systems an even more formidable task.
Here, we report two new metal–nitrite complexes that contain moderately strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds to a nitro-(η1-NO2) ligand. We show that the detrimental effect of these interactions on the nitro → nitrito conversion process can be mitigated by careful control of the experiment temperature, providing a positive new outlook on the compatibility of hydrogen bonds and linkage isomer switching in the solid-state.
Found: C = 30.36%; H = 5.75%; N = 10.98%.
Found: C = 25.95%; H = 5.26%; N = 9.14%.
The ambidentate nitrite ligand adopts solely the nitro-(η1-NO2) geometry in the flash-cooled GS. Fig. 1a shows the full atomic connectivity in the asymmetric unit, and Table 1 gives selected single-crystal X-ray data for the GS structure of 1.
GS (100 K) | MS (100 K) | GS (150 K) | MS (150 K) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Photo-conversion | 0% | 56% (29% endo, 27% exo) | 0% | 100% (100% endo) |
Temperature | 100 K | 100 K | 150 K | 150 K |
Wavelength | 0.71073 Å | 0.71073 Å | 0.71073 Å | 0.71073 Å |
Empirical formula | C13H29F3N4O5Pd1S1 | C13H29F3N4O5Pd1S1 | C13H29F3N4O5Pd1S1 | C13H29F3N4O5Pd1S1 |
Formula weight | 516.86 | 516.86 | 516.86 | 516.86 |
Crystal size | 0.45 × 0.24 × 0.20 | 0.45 × 0.24 × 0.20 | 0.45 × 0.24 × 0.20 | 0.45 × 0.24 × 0.20 |
Crystal system | Monoclinic | Monoclinic | Monoclinic | Monoclinic |
Space group | P21/n | P21/n | P21/n | P21/n |
Unit cell parameters (constrained) | a = 9.2030(3) Å | a = 9.2897(4) Å | a = 9.2318(4) Å | a = 9.2793(5) Å |
b = 13.1728(5) Å | b = 13.0472(5) Å | b = 13.1472(6) Å | b = 12.9527(7) Å | |
c = 16.9033(6) Å | c = 16.6730(8) Å | c = 17.0207(9) Å | c = 16.6542(10) Å | |
β = 97.388(4)° | β = 98.853(4)° | β = 96.736(5)° | β = 99.379(4)° | |
Volume | 2032.4(1) Å3 | 1996.8(2) Å3 | 2051.6(2) Å3 | 1974.9(2) Å3 |
Z | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Density (calculated) | 1.689 Mg m−3 | 1.721 Mg m−3 | 1.673 Mg m−3 | 1.738 Mg m−3 |
Absorption coefficient μ | 1.074 mm−1 | 1.093 mm−1 | 1.064 mm−1 | 1.105 mm−1 |
F(000) | 1056 | 1056 | 1056 | 1056 |
R (int) | 0.0360 | 0.0285 | 0.0301 | 0.0306 |
Completeness (to θ = 25.00°) | 0.997 | 0.995 | 0.997 | 0.995 |
R 1 (observed data: I > 2σ(I)) | 0.0284 | 0.0313 | 0.0309 | 0.0323 |
wR2 (all data) | 0.0603 | 0.0697 | 0.0649 | 0.0668 |
Reflections (independent) | 9352(4145) | 8848(4068) | 9030(4196) | 8451(4028) |
Fig. 1b shows the GS packing arrangement. 1-D chains of Pd-cations extend parallel to the b-axis, formed by discrete D11(2) hydrogen bonds linking the 2° amine donor group N(3)–H(3) on one molecule to the nitro O(1) acceptor on the next, symmetry-related cation (Fig. 1c). This hydrogen bond motif is significant, as it directly involves the potentially photo-active nitro-(η1-NO2) groups. The hydrogen bonds must be disrupted for photo-isomerisation to proceed and, given the literature precedent,16 could be likely to hinder high photo-conversion in 1. The OTf anions sit in discrete pockets, with each OTf participating in short contacts with 6 nearest neighbour cations. These contacts are primarily weak C–H⋯O or C–H⋯F interactions between OTf and neighbouring Et4dien ligands, and are unlikely to strongly influence any potential photo-isomerisation.
There is a unit cell volume decrease of ΔV = −35.6(1) Å3 (or −1.75% of the GS cell) on irradiation of 1 at 100 K, which is statistically significant.24 This is in contrast to the majority of photo-switchable nitrite linkage isomers reported, which more typically show an expansion of the crystal on activation.6–8 The unit cell reduction is anisotropic: while the b and c axes contract by −0.1256(5) Å and −0.230(1) Å respectively, the a-axis lengthens by 0.0867(5) Å. Given that the 1-D chains of metal cations extend parallel to the a-axis, it might be argued that the expansion in this direction is a direct result of the isomerisation. However, the overall decrease in unit cell volume would suggest that the photo-induced nitrito isomers occupy less overall volume than the GS nitro-(η1-NO2) form. This observation can be quantitatively confirmed by comparing the Hirshfeld surface volume for the cation molecules in each of the GS and MS structures (see section 1 in the ESI†).25
The hydrogen bond network in the GS of 1 must be broken for photo-excitation to occur and, following activation, neither of the photo-induced nitrito isomers form significant hydrogen bonds in the MS. This provides a possible explanation for the incomplete photo-conversion achieved at 100 K. It appears that irradiation is insufficient to break all of the hydrogen bonds required for complete photo-excitation, which again indicates that strong intermolecular interactions are detrimental for photo-induced linkage isomer conversion in the single-crystal.
The crystal held in its photostationary state was next subject to variable temperature parametric studies, to ascertain the behaviour of the photo-active isomers with temperature. The crystal was warmed in 10 K steps and an X-ray dataset obtained at each interval to reveal the nitrite isomer ratio. The results of these studies are given in Table 2. Between 100 and 120 K, while the GS isomer occupancy remains constant, within error, the exo-ONO occupancy is found to decrease, with a concomitant increase in endo-ONO. This suggests that the exo-ONO isomer, while sufficiently metastable to be observed at very low temperature, decays directly into the endo-ONO geometry with only a small thermal energy barrier. As such, the relative nitrite isomer stability in 1 at 100 K is exo-nitrito-(η1-ONO) < endo-nitrito-(η1-ONO) < nitro-(η1-NO2).
Temp/K | Irradiation time/h | Nitrite occupancy level | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Nitro | endo-Nitrito | exo-Nitrito | ||
100 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
100 | 1 | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.27 |
100 | 2 | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.27 |
110 | 2 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.17 |
120 | 2 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.00 |
130 | 2 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.00 |
140 | 2 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.00 |
150 | 2 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.00 |
The crystal was held at 150 K and irradiated with 400 nm LED light. After 1 h the LEDs were switched off and the MS structure determined at 150 K. In contrast to results at 100 K, irradiation at 150 K induces 100% conversion to the endo-ONO form (Fig. 2a), with no evidence of an exo-ONO isomer. The unit cell volume again decreases, with ΔV = −76.7(2) Å3 (or −3.74% of the GS unit cell). The GS hydrogen bond network is now entirely disrupted to enable complete photo-conversion, and the MS endo-ONO structure shows no significant hydrogen bonding to neighbouring molecules.
Finally, variable temperature parametric studies conducted at 150–300 K determine the temperature range over which the endo-ONO isomer is metastable (Table 3). The crystal regains GS nitro geometry by 190 K, indicating the MS limit region in 1.
Temp/K | Irradiation time/h | Nitrite occupancy level | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Nitro | endo-Nitrito | exo-Nitrito | ||
150 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
150 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
170 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.95 | 0.00 |
180 | 1 | 0.37 | 0.63 | 0.00 |
190 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
210 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
250 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
300 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
GS | MS | GS | MS | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Photo-conversion | 0% | 68% (56% endo, 12% exo) | 0% | 93% (93% endo) |
Temperature | 100 K | 100 K | 200 K | 200 K |
Wavelength | 0.71073 Å | 0.71073 Å | 0.71073 Å | 0.71073 Å |
Empirical formula | C13H29F3N4O5Pt1S1 | C13H29F3N4O5Pt1S1 | C13H29F3N4O5Pt1S1 | C13H29F3N4O5Pt1S1 |
Formula weight | 605.55 | 605.55 | 605.55 | 605.55 |
Crystal size | 0.50 × 0.26 × 0.07 | 0.50 × 0.26 × 0.07 | 0.49 × 0.21 × 0.09 | 0.49 × 0.21 × 0.09 |
Crystal system | Monoclinic | Monoclinic | Monoclinic | Monoclinic |
Space group | P21/n | P21/n | P21/n | P21/n |
Unit cell parameters (constrained) | a = 9.2331(3) Å | a = 9.3067(4) Å | a = 9.2636(3) Å | a = 9.3268(2) Å |
b = 13.1391(4) Å | b = 13.0046(5) Å | b = 13.1409(4) Å | b = 12.9755(3) Å | |
c = 16.9695(5) Å | c = 16.7285(8) Å | c = 17.1074(6) Å | c = 16.7508(4) Å | |
β = 97.100(3)° | β = 99.001(4)° | β = 96.567(3)° | β = 99.170(2)° | |
Volume | 2042.9(1) Å3 | 1999.7(2) | 2068.9(1) Å3 | 2001.3(1) |
Z | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Density (calculated) | 1.969 Mg m−3 | 2.011 Mg m−3 | 1.944 Mg m−3 | 2.010 Mg m−3 |
Absorption coefficient μ | 7.028 mm−1 | 7.180 mm−1 | 6.940 mm−1 | 7.174 mm−1 |
F(000) | 1184 | 1184 | 1184 | 1184 |
R (int) | 0.0267 | 0.0355 | 0.0399 | 0.0388 |
Completeness (to θ = 25.00°) | 0.998 | 0.997 | 0.997 | 0.998 |
R 1 (observed data: I > 2σ(I)) | 0.0279 | 0.0358 | 0.0213 | 0.0187 |
wR2 (all data) | 0.0666 | 0.0854 | 0.0487 | 0.0429 |
Reflections (independent) | 10322(4173) | 9264(4085) | 17464(4226) | 21907(4086) |
After 1 h irradiation, an X-ray dataset revealed that 22% of the crystal was converted to a MS endo-ONO isomer, 7% to exo-ONO, with the remaining 71% in GS NO2 geometry (Fig. S3†). Further irradiation increased the ES isomer occupancy levels, with a photostationary state of 32% NO2, 56% endo-ONO and 12% exo-ONO isomers achieved after a total of 3 h illumination. Analysis of the Hirshfeld surface volume for the cation in the GS and MS structures of 2 confirm that, as for 1, the photo-isomers occupy less volume than the GS NO2 form (Fig. S4 and Table S2†).
Variable temperature parametric studies next followed the variation in the nitro:nitrito occupancies on warming. Table 5 confirms that exo-ONO is observed between 100 and 130 K, however, as for the 100 K MS of 1, this isomer gradually decays into the endo-ONO geometry across this temperature range.
Temp/K | Irradiation time/h | Nitrite occupancy level | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Nitro | endo-Nitrito | exo-Nitrito | ||
100 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
100 | 1 | 0.71 | 0.22 | 0.07 |
100 | 2 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.10 |
100 | 3 | 0.32 | 0.56 | 0.12 |
110 | 3 | 0.32 | 0.57 | 0.10 |
120 | 3 | 0.32 | 0.62 | 0.05 |
130 | 3 | 0.33 | 0.63 | 0.04 |
140 | 3 | 0.34 | 0.66 | 0.00 |
150 | 3 | 0.33 | 0.67 | 0.00 |
The crystal was held at 200 K and irradiated in situ with 400 nm LED light. The results of these studies are given in Table 6. A photostationary state of 93% endo-ONO and 7% GS nitro NO2 isomers was achieved after 3 h irradiation, which is – to the author's knowledge – the highest-reported photo-conversion in a Pt(II) linkage isomer to-date. Similarly to 1, no evidence of the exo-ONO form was found at this higher temperature. Variable temperature parametric studies show that the MS limit for the photo-induced endo-ONO isomer in 2 lies in the region of 230–240 K, with the crystal returning to its GS NO2 isomer by 250 K.
Temp/K | Irradiation time/h | Nitrite occupancy level | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Nitro | endo-Nitrito | exo-Nitrito | ||
200 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
200 | 1 | 0.11 | 0.89 | 0.00 |
200 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.92 | 0.00 |
200 | 3 | 0.07 | 0.93 | 0.00 |
210 | 3 | 0.08 | 0.92 | 0.00 |
220 | 3 | 0.09 | 0.91 | 0.00 |
230 | 3 | 0.18 | 0.82 | 0.00 |
240 | 3 | 0.66 | 0.34 | 0.00 |
250 | 3 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
300 | 3 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The first contrast is the fact that the exo-ONO isomer is only present in the MS structures obtained at 100 K. Previous reports of photo-induced exo-ONO isomers suggest that this species is an intermediate existing in the pathway between GS NO2 and MS endo-ONO forms.5 The present results support this theory, as exo-ONO decays directly into endo-ONO on warming with no change in GS NO2 occupancy. Despite this, the fact that the exo-ONO occupancy is as high as 27% for 1 and 12% for 2, even after the light is removed, does suggest that the exo-ONO isomer is an independent ES with its own stability range. The exo-ONO isomer has decayed by 120 K in 1 and by 140 K in 2, which indicates that its ES lifetime is too short to be observed by steady-state photocrystallographic methods above these temperatures.26 This would explain why there is no evidence of the exo-ONO form at 150 or 200 K.
It is also interesting to compare the overall photo-activation level in 1 and 2 at each temperature. Despite the presence of multiple MS isomers at 100 K, excitation remains incomplete: for 1 the combined exo- and endo-ONO ratios give an overall conversion of 56%, in 2 the sum is 68%. In contrast, much higher photo-conversion is achieved in 1 and 2 at higher temperature, with 100% excitation in 1 after just 1 h at 150 K.
There are several structural factors that may explain these observations. Firstly, we reflect that all of the structures contain hydrogen bonding to the GS NO2 group. In the GS structures of 1 and 2, the NO2⋯amine interaction is linear and a comparison of the hydrogen bond distances is given in Tables 7 and 8. In line with thermal lattice expansion, the N(3)–H(3)⋯O(1) hydrogen bonds are significantly longer at higher temperature, consistent with these interactions becoming weaker on warming. If, as expected, hydrogen bonds to the GS NO2 ligand inhibit photo-isomerism,16 the weaker interaction at high temperature is expected to facilitate higher conversion. Secondly, it has been previously shown that “reaction cavity” analysis – where a reaction cavity is defined as the volume encapsulating the photo-active group – provides insight into local structural changes and helps to rationalize how or why a photo-reaction proceeds.14,15Tables 9 and 10 (and Fig. S5 and S6†) show reaction cavity analyses for the GS and MS structures of 1 and 2. For both complexes, the GS reaction cavity volumes are larger at higher temperatures. This indicates that there is more available space, and so fewer steric restrictions, in the vicinity of the NO2 ligand at higher temperatures, which may help the reaction to proceed to higher conversion. In addition, the overall change in reaction cavity volume on photo-activation (ΔVc) can be used to provide a measure of how much the local structure must change in order to accommodate linkage isomer photo-switching. For a single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformation, we expect that the reaction proceeding with the least amount of movement or structural rearrangement will impart the least strain to the surrounding crystalline array, and will therefore be most favourable.28 As such, we expect that the reaction requiring the smallest change in the vicinity of the photo-switching nitrite ligand (i.e. smallest ΔVc) will lead to highest photo-conversion. For 1, ΔVc is ∼3.4× smaller at 150 K than 100 K, while for 2 ΔVc is ∼1.8× smaller at 200 K than 100 K. This provides a rationale for why higher conversion levels can be accommodated at higher temperatures in both of the complexes.
Temp/K | Graph set | Symmetry operation | D⋯A distance/Å |
---|---|---|---|
100 | D11(2) | ½ − x, −½ + y, ½ − z | 2.801(3) |
150 | D11(2) | ½ − x, −½ + y, ½ − z | 2.815(3) |
Temp/K | Graph set | Symmetry operation | D⋯A distance/Å |
---|---|---|---|
100 | D11(2) | ½ − x, −½ + y, ½ − z | 2.798(6) |
200 | D11(2) | ½ − x, −½ + y, ½ − z | 2.810(4) |
Temp/K | V c per unit cell/Å3 | V c per molecule/Å3 | ΔVc (MS–GS)/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GS | 100 | 127.66 | 31.92 | |
MS | 100 | 139.04 | 34.76 | 8.91 |
GS | 150 | 133.05 | 33.26 | |
MS | 150 | 136.51 | 34.13 | 2.60 |
Temp/K | V c per unit cell/Å3 | V c per molecule/Å3 | ΔVc (MS–GS)/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GS | 100 | 132.30 | 33.08 | |
MS | 100 | 138.02 | 34.51 | 4.32 |
GS | 200 | 138.23 | 34.56 | |
MS | 200 | 141.53 | 35.38 | 2.37 |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 1564437–1564451 (1) and 1564462–1564480 (2) contain the crystallographic data for this paper. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c7ce01366c |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 |