DOI:
10.1039/C5RA05635G
(Communication)
RSC Adv., 2015,
5, 42477-42481
CVD synthesis of Cu2O films for catalytic application†
Received
30th March 2015
, Accepted 5th May 2015
First published on 5th May 2015
Abstract
Pure Cu2O was synthesized at 270 °C by pulsed-spray evaporation chemical vapor deposition. The results indicate that Cu2O is effective for the complete oxidation of VOCs with good reusability and reproducibility. The lattice and adsorbed oxygen as well as the hollow ball-like geometry are dedicated to the catalytic processes.
1. Introduction
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are the main air pollutants emitted from the combustion of fossil fuels in many industry processes and transportation activities.1,2 VOCs are associated with various health-related problems.3 Catalytic combustion was commonly used for the abatement of VOCs in the past few decades.4 The involved catalysts are mainly composed of noble metals such as Au, Pt and Rh5–7 and transition metal oxides (TMOs).8,9 Noble metals generally exhibit good catalytic performance, but they are expensive and easy to be poisoned. For these reasons, catalytic oxidation of VOCs over TMOs has captured increasing attention, and considerable efforts have been devoted to the synthesis and application of TMOs for such purposes.10 Specifically, Mn3O4, CuO, Fe2O3 and Co3O4 exhibited good performance as active catalysts for VOCs treatment.4,11–14
Compared to other TMOs, Cu2O has excellent catalytic applications for VOCs.15 Rostami and Jafari16 used Cu2O as an efficient catalyst to remove aromatic compounds. Kim and Shim15 investigated the catalytic characteristic of Cu2O and concluded that Cu2O was active for the removal of VOCs.
Several methods were involved in the production of Cu2O, such as sol–gel,17 top-down approach with nanosecond and picosecond lasers,18 honey aided solution synthesis,19 electrochemical synthesis20 and photonic crystal template-assisted electrodeposition.21 However, a mixture of Cu, Cu2O and CuO was generally obtained by those methods and synthesis of pure Cu2O was scarce. In recent years, pulsed-spray evaporation chemical vapor deposition (PSE-CVD) has been successfully used to prepare a series of TMOs, e.g., Co3O4
22 and Mn3O4.23 Compared to the above-mentioned techniques, PSE-CVD is easy to control the thickness and quality of the films without any further treatment. Thus, PSE-CVD exhibits great potential to prepare Cu2O thin films.
In the current work, the Cu2O thin films were synthesized by a home-made PSE-CVD system. Among the VOCs, unsaturated hydrocarbons are often encountered emissions from hydrocarbon flames. Since the unsaturated hydrocarbons such as C2H2 and C3H6 are quite difficult to be oxidized, especially C2H2 is an important precursor to form soot during the combustion of fossil fuel, C2H2 and C3H6 were selected as representatives for the deep oxidation of VOCs existed in the exhaust emissions. The prepared Cu2O samples were characterized in terms of structure, morphology and composition as well as catalytic performance.
2. Material and methods
2.1 Preparation of Cu2O thin films
The Cu2O thin films were synthesized in a PSE-CVD system combined with cold-wall stagnation point-flow CVD reactor and waste collector, as presented in Fig. 1. The preparation process consists of four steps. Firstly, copper acetylacetonate (Cu(acac)2) was dissolved in ethanol at a concentration of 2.5 mM, which was delivered as liquid feedstock by a PSE unit. The delivery frequency was 4 Hz and the opening time of PSE was 2.5 ms. The feeding rate was 1.03 mL min−1. The 30 cm long evaporation chamber was kept at 3.0 kPa and 180 °C. Secondly, the resulting vapor was transported into the deposition chamber with O2 and N2 with flowrates of 1.0 and 0.5 standard liter per minute (SLM), respectively. Thirdly, the Cu2O thin films were formed on different substrates (planar glass, stainless steel and mesh grid) kept at 270 °C for characterization purposes. Finally, the waste vapor was collected by a liquid nitrogen trap. The details of the optimized conditions are summarized in Table ESI S1.†
 |
| Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the PSE-CVD system. | |
2.2 Characterization
The obtained Cu2O films were characterized in terms of structure, morphology and chemical composition with X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), respectively. XRD analysis was performed on Bruker D8 Focus with Cu Kα radiation, scan angle of 5–90° and scanning step of 0.02°. The microstructure was examined using SEM (S-4800 Hitachi) with the resolution of 1.5 nm (15 kV). The chemical composition was identified by the XPS (ESCALAB 250Xi) with pass energy of 20 eV and energy step size of 0.050 eV. The XPS results were analyzed by Avantage which is one of the most widely used softwares for XPS analysis. The elemental contents in the samples was quantitative analyzed by non-linear least square fitting method and the oxygen was analyzed by Unimodal fitting method.24
2.3 Catalytic test
The performances of the Cu2O films for C2H2 and C3H6 conversion were investigated by a fixed bed quartz reactor, as shown in Fig. 2. A 60 cm long alundum tube (8.0 mm inner diameter) was fixed in a digital electrical furnace. 20 mg of the Cu2O supported on grid mesh of stainless steel was located at the isothermal area. A K-thermocouple was used to measure the temperature of Cu2O film. A gas mixture consisted of 1% fuel gas (C2H2 or C3H6), 10% O2 and 89% Ar was introduced into the alundum tube with a total flow rate of 15 mL min−1, corresponding to the gaseous hourly space velocity (ghsv) of 45
000 mL gcat−1 h−1. The temperature of the furnace was rised with a ramp of 2 °C min−1. Finally, the exhausting gas was measured by a gas chromatograph (Agilent, GC3000) for qualitative and quantitative analysis.
 |
| Fig. 2 Experimental setup of catalytic test. | |
3. Results and discussion
3.1 Growth
By measuring the weight difference of the substrates before and after deposition, the growth of the prepared films can be estimated. As displayed in Fig. 3, a linear behavior is observed and the growth rate of Cu2O is calculated to be 1.6 nm min−1. According to Tian et al.,25 the increase of the pressure may promote full surface coverage by adsorbing more Cu(acac)2 and O2, which could accelerate the nucleation step and result in a high growth rate. In this work, the pressure for the synthesis of Cu2O films was optimized to be 3.0 kPa. According to the previous results,25 the substrate temperature should be lower than 275 °C for the synthesis of pure Cu2O. In the experiments, the temperature for the synthesis of Cu2O was fixed at 270 °C. Similar to the same strategy,25 the other parameters such as the concentration of the precursor in the liquid feedstock, the pulse width and frequency of the precursor delivery have also been optimized (see Table ESI S1†). The results also indicate that the synthesis of Cu2O with PSE-CVD system can be tailored with respect to thickness.
 |
| Fig. 3 Linear growth of Cu2O thin films on stainless steel. | |
3.2 Phase identification
The XRD pattern of the obtained thin film is shown in Fig. 4. The well-defined diffraction peaks are observed at 36.41°, 42.24°, and 61.88°, which can be well attributed to (111), (200) and (220) orientations of Cu2O in the literature (JCPDS no. 05-0667). The two weak peaks located at 29.73° and 73.81° fit well with the (110) and (311) planes of Cu2O. No characteristic peaks of any other impurities were observed in the XRD patterns, indicating the formation of monoclinic Cu2O phase.26,27 In the work by Medina-Valtierra et al.,26 they prepared Cu2O film by CVD with the same precursor. However, no film of Cu2O was formed when the deposition temperature was lower than 320 °C. For sample prepared at 320 °C, only (111) and (200) planes were observed.26 However, the XRD analysis indicates that pure Cu2O thin films can be easily prepared by PSE-DVD at as low as 270 °C in this work.
 |
| Fig. 4 XRD pattern of the Cu2O thin film prepared on glass at 270 °C. | |
3.3 Microstructural studies
The sharp and strong reflection peaks suggest that the as-prepared samples are well crystallized. The crystallite size and the micro-strain of Cu2O thin films were calculated to be 29 nm and 0.06% by applying Scherrer's formula: D = 0.9λ/β
cos
θ and the equation ε = β/2cot
θ to the most intense diffraction peak, where λ = 0.154056 nm, β and θ represent the full width at half maximum and diffraction angle of the observed peak, respectively.28
The formation of Cu2O can be preceded with the adsorption of the precursor on the heated substrate, ligands removal, formation of Cu metal and oxidation of Cu to Cu2O. Both temperature and pressure play important roles in the deposition processes. With the same precursor, a pure phase of CuO phase was obtained at 300 °C by Tian et al.,25 while Cu2O was formed at 320 °C by Medina-Valtierra et al.26 Such high temperature for Cu2O formation could be due to the usage of low flowrate of O2 flow (30 mL min−1) in their work.
SEM inspection was carried out to reveal the morphology of the as-obtained Cu2O samples. The representative SEM images with different magnifications are shown in Fig. 5. The SEM images indicate that the film is homogeneous and is composed of a large quantity of small ball-like particles. The average grain size is estimated to be 30 nm, which matches well with the crystallite size calculated by the XRD results. The calculated size is much smaller than that prepared with electrodeposition (500–700 nm) by Yu et al.29 Besides the ball-like shapes, a number of hollows are also observed. The small grain size and hollows could absorb more oxygen than the smooth surface, which would benefit for the catalytic oxidation of VOCs.
 |
| Fig. 5 SEM images of thin Cu2O films at different magnifications. | |
3.4 Surface composition
In order to explore the chemical composition of the Cu2O films, an ex situ XPS analysis was performed on both bare and etched surfaces of Cu2O films prepared on stainless steel. Fig. 6a presents the entire spectrum and Table ESI S2† lists the elemental contents for the prepared samples. Based on the XPS results, the Cu
:
O atomic ratio of 95 nm etched layer was estimated to be about 2
:
1, which is consistent with the form of Cu2O obtained with XRD analysis. Besides the presence of copper and oxygen, carbon was also found on the surfaces of the prepared samples (see Fig. ESI S1–S3†). After 95 nm etching, the content of C 1s that mainly comes from ambient air or the decomposition of the precursor is negligible.
 |
| Fig. 6 Entire XPS spectrum (a) and Cu 2p spectrum (b) of Cu2O thin film. | |
As exhibited in Fig. 6b, the Cu 2p1/2 peak is centered at 952.25 eV and the Cu 2p3/2 peaks at 932.35 eV.30 Since Cu 2p can hardly differentiate Cu2+ from Cu1+, it is necessary to involve analysis of auger spectrum. The Cu auger spectrum of the obtained thin film was shown in Fig. 7a. The obvious peak located at 916.80 eV is perfectly coinciding with the standard auger spectrum of Cu2O, which further confirm the purity of Cu2O synthesized in this study. The binding energies of O 1s were observed to be 529.65 and 531.45 eV (see Fig. 7b), corresponding to the lattice oxygen (OL) and adsorbed oxygen (Oads), respectively. The fitted profiles agree well with the measured profiles, as shown in Fig. 7b.
 |
| Fig. 7 Cu LM2 (a) and O 1s signals (b) of a representative Cu2O thin film. | |
3.5 Catalytic performance
The catalytic performance of the Cu2O grown on mesh of stainless steel was tested for the complete oxidation of C2H2 and C3H6 at atmospheric pressure. The background effect of the stainless steel element on the oxidation was examined by carrying out the experiments on non-coated mesh (NCM) under the same conditions. The catalytic tests were carried out three times for the same sample and the results are quite close, demonstrating that the prepared Cu2O has good reusability with reproduced results. Fig. 8 compares the temperature-dependent conversion ratio of C2H2 and C3H6 with Cu2O-coated mesh and non-coated mesh. Compared to the non-coated mesh condition, the complete oxidation of C2H2 decreased from 450 to 300 °C and for C3H6 decreased from 675 to 425 °C over Cu2O. It should be mentioned that during the oxidation of C2H2 and C3H6 over Cu2O-coated mesh, CO was not detected. However, a number of CO was measured over non-coated mesh. Compared to other TMOs such as Mn3O4,23 Co3O4
22 and Co–Mn oxides31 for the oxidation of C2H2 and C3H6, Cu2O exhibits better catalytic performances.
 |
| Fig. 8 Outlet profiles of C2H2 and C3H6 oxidation over NCM and mesh grid of stainless steel coated with Cu2O. | |
With an Arrhenius expression,14 apparent activation energies (Eappa) of less than 15% of C2H2 and C3H6 conversion were deduced. The Eappa of C2H2 and C3H6 oxidation over non-coated mesh are 93.5 and 92.0 kJ mol−1, while these values shift to 51.7 and 57.0 kJ mol−1 with Cu2O-coated samples (average values for three times), respectively. Compared to Eappa obtained with other TMOs, such as Co3O4 (128.9 kJ mol−1 for C2H2, 127.1 kJ mol−1 for C3H6)14 and Mn3O4 (84.7 kJ mol−1 for C3H6),23 the reaction with Cu2O shows lower Eappa. The abundant hollows revealed by the SEM images are expected to absorb more oxygen and reduce the activation barrier. Moreover, the high Cu
:
O ratio on the surfaces of the prepared samples could provide more active sites. Thus, the relatively low Eappa may contribute to accelerate the oxidation processes and enhance the catalytic performance for oxidation of C2H2 and C3H6.
It is generally accepted that the oxidation of low-rank hydrocarbons over TMOs follows the redox mechanism.30 Firstly, Cu2O reacts with oxygen, giving rise to CuO. Secondly, the reaction of C2H2 and C3H6 with the trapped or lattice oxygen occurs, leading to CuO reduction and release of oxygen to form Cu2O. From the XPS results, both OL and Oads contain mainly O22− and O− species. Both O22− and O− are strongly electrophilic reactants. They can attack an organic molecule in the region of its highest electron density and result in the oxidation of the carbon skeleton. As the electrophilic oxygen species such as OL and Oads are generally responsible for the total oxidation of hydrocarbons to CO2, these electrophilic oxygen species (O22− or O−) presented at the surface of Cu2O are expected to benefit for the complete conversion of C2H2 and C3H6 (see Fig. ESI S4†).32 Moreover, the hollow ball-like morphology revealed by the microstructure analysis could expose more surface area and adsorb more oxygen, which would make the oxidation occur at relatively low temperatures.
4. Conclusions
This work presents a detailed introduction of facile synthesis of Cu2O thin films by using a home-made PSE-CVD system for catalytic oxidation of C2H2 and C3H6. XRD, SEM and XPS were employed to characterize the physicochemical properties of the deposited films. The catalytic oxidation of C2H2 and C3H6 over Cu2O samples was tested at atmospheric pressure in a fixed-bed quartz reactor. XRD analysis indicates that the prepared films are pure Cu2O. The results show that the Cu2O leads the complete oxidation decreased by 175 °C for C2H2 and 250 °C for C3H6 relative to the non-coated mesh. According to the microstructure and XPS results, the lattice and adsorbed oxygen as well as the hollow ball-like geometry could benefit for the deep oxidation of C2H2 and C3H6. These results reveal that Cu2O can be easily prepared and show good potential in the catalytic abatement of VOCs.
Acknowledgements
Prof. ZYT thanks the financial support from the Recruitment Program of Global Youth Experts (Grant no. Y41Z024BA1).
Notes and references
- O. L. Olga, S. S. Yu, N. S. Valentin and I. T. Nikolai, Global Atmospheric Change and its Impact on Regional Air Quality, NATO Sci. Ser., IV, 2002, 16, 243–247 Search PubMed.
- X. K. Chen, L. L. Feng, H. L. Luo and H. M. Cheng, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2014, 21, 12868–12882 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- G. Y. Li, Z. Y. Zhang, H. W. Sun, J. Y. Chen, T. C. An and B. Li, J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, 250, 147–154 CrossRef PubMed.
- S. C. Kim and W. G. Shim, Appl. Catal., B, 2010, 98, 180–185 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- S. Ivanova, C. Petit and V. Pitchon, Gold Bull., 2006, 39, 3–8 CrossRef CAS.
- A. C. Gluhoi, N. Bogdanchikova and B. E. Nieuwenhuys, J. Catal., 2005, 232, 96–101 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- T. Maillet, C. Solleau, J. Barbier Jr and D. Duprez, Appl. Catal., B, 1997, 14, 85–95 CrossRef CAS.
- H. H. Chen, Y. Yan, Y. Shao and H. P. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 55202–55209 RSC.
- P. Yang, S. S. Yang, Z. N. Shi, Z. H. Meng and R. X. Zhou, Appl. Catal., B, 2015, 162, 227–235 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- M. H. Khedr, K. S. A. Halim, M. I. Nasr and A. M. El-Mansy, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2006, 430, 40–45 CrossRef PubMed.
- S. Somekawa, T. Hagiwara, K. Fujii, M. Kojima, T. Shinoda, K. Takanabe and K. Domen, Appl. Catal., A, 2011, 409, 209–214 CrossRef PubMed.
- A. Urbutis and S. Kitrys, Chemija, 2013, 24, 111–117 CAS.
- S. R. Wang, H. X. Zhang, Y. S. Wang, L. W. Wang and Z. Gong, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 369–373 RSC.
- Z. Y. Tian, N. Bahlawane, F. Qi and K. Kohse-Höinghaus, Catal. Commun., 2009, 11, 118–122 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- S. C. Kim and W. G. Shim, Appl. Catal., B, 2008, 79, 149–156 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- R. Rostami and A. J. Jafari, Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 2014, 12, 1–10 CrossRef PubMed.
- P. Mallick, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A, 2014, 84, 387–389 CrossRef CAS.
- M. Ali, F. Yehya, A. K. Chaudhary and V. V. S. S. Srikanth, Conference on Light and its Interactions with Matter, 2014, vol. 1620, pp. 327–331 Search PubMed.
- M. Ali, N. K. Rotte and V. V. S. S. Srikanth, Mater. Lett., 2014, 128, 253–255 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- F. Hu, K. C. Chan, T. M. Yue and C. Surya, Thin Solid Films, 2014, 550, 17–21 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- J. P. Zhang and L. P. Yu, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron., 2014, 25, 5646–5651 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- P. Mountapmbeme Kouotou, Z. Y. Tian, U. Mundloch, N. Bahlawane and K. Kohse-Höinghaus, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 10809–10812 RSC.
- Z. Y. Tian, P. Mountapmbeme Kouotou, N. Bahlawane and P. H. Tchoua Ngamou, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 6218–6224 CAS.
- M. C. Biesinger, L. W. M. Lau, A. R. Gerson and R. S. C. Smart, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2010, 257, 887–898 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- Z. Y. Tian, H. J. Herrenbruck, P. Mountapmbeme Kouotou, H. Vieker, A. Beyer, A. Golzhauser and K. Kohse-Höinghaus, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2013, 230, 33–38 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- J. M. Valtierra, J. Ramírez-Ortiz, V. M. Arroyo-Rojas and F. Ruiz, Appl. Catal., A, 2003, 238, 1–9 CrossRef.
- G. G. Condorelli, G. Malandrino and I. Fragala, Chem. Mater., 1994, 6, 1861–1866 CrossRef CAS.
- Z. Y. Tian, N. Bahlawane, V. Vannier and K. Kohse-Höinghaus, Proc. Combust. Inst., 2013, 34, 2261–2268 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- X. J. Yu, Y. C. Wei, L. Z. Huang, J. F. Niu, J. Zhang, X. M. Li and B. H. Yao, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2014, 148, 727–733 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
- X. S. Jiang, M. Zhang, S. W. Shi, G. He, X. P. Song and Z. Q. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2014, 161, D640–D643 CrossRef PubMed.
- Z. Y. Tian, P. H. Tchoua Ngamou, V. Vannier, K. Kohse-Höinghaus and N. Bahlawane, Appl. Catal., B, 2012, 117, 125–134 CrossRef PubMed.
- P. Mountapmbeme Kouotou, H. Vieker, Z. Y. Tian, P. H. Tchoua Ngamou, A. El Kasmi, A. Beyer, A. Golzhauser and K. Kohse-Höinghaus, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 3359–3367 CAS.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental conditions, some XPS spectra and outlet profiles of CO and CO2 during the catalytic tests. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra05635g |
|
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.