Low-cost electrochemical gas sensing of vertical differences in wintertime air composition (CO, NO, NO2, O3) in Fairbanks, Alaska

Tjarda J. Roberts, Meeta Cesler-Maloney and William R. Simpson

Faraday Discuss., 2025, 258, 307
DOI: 10.1039/D4FD00177J

Clustering approaches to improve the performance of low cost air pollution sensors

Katie R. Smith, Peter M. Edwards, Mathew J. Evans, James D. Lee, Marvin D. Shaw, Freya Squires, Shona Wilde and Alastair C. Lewis

Faraday Discuss., 2017, 200, 621
DOI: 10.1039/C7FD00020K

Handheld methanol detector for beverage analysis: interlaboratory validation

Jan van den Broek, Sebastian D. Keller, Ian Goodall, Katie Parish-Virtue, Claudia Bauer-Christoph, Johannes Fuchs, Despina Tsipi, Andreas T. Güntner, Thomas Blum, Jean-Charles Mathurin, Matthias G. Steiger, Roghayeh Shirvani, Manfred Gössinger, Monika Graf, Peter Anderhub, Daniel Z'graggen, Claudio Hüsser, Benjamin Faigle and Agapiou Agapios

Anal. Methods, 2024, 16, 3859
DOI: 10.1039/D4AY00919C

Using low-cost sensors to monitor indoor, outdoor, and personal ozone concentrations in Beijing, China

Meichen Liu, Karoline K. Barkjohn, Christina Norris, James J. Schauer, Junfeng Zhang, Yinping Zhang, Min Hu and Michael Bergin

Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2020, 22, 131
DOI: 10.1039/C9EM00377K

Toward high value sensing: monolayer-protected metal nanoparticles in multivariable gas and vapor sensors

Radislav A. Potyrailo

Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 5311
DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00007C

Particulate matter in a lockdown home: evaluation, calibration, results and health risk from an IoT enabled low-cost sensor network for residential air quality monitoring

Nicole Cowell, Lee Chapman, William Bloss, Deepchandra Srivastava, Suzanne Bartington and Ajit Singh

Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2023, 3, 65
DOI: 10.1039/D2EA00124A

Sensors for Context-Aware Smart Healthcare: A Security Perspective

Edgar Batista, M. Angels Moncusi, Pablo López-Aguilar, Antoni Martínez-Ballesté and Agusti Solanas

Sensors, 2021, 21, 6886
DOI: 10.3390/s21206886

Machine-learning-based precise cost-efficient NO2 sensor calibration by means of time series matching and global data pre-processing

Slawomir Koziel, Anna Pietrenko-Dabrowska, Marek Wojcikowski and Bogdan Pankiewicz

Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 2024, 54, 101729
DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101729

Design of a Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring System Using Arduino and ThingSpeak

Anabi Hilary Kelechi, Mohammed H. Alsharif, Chidumebi Agbaetuo, Osichinaka Ubadike, Alex Aligbe, Peerapong Uthansakul, Raju Kannadasan and Ayman A. Aly

Computers, Materials & Continua, 2022, 70, 151
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2022.019431

Development of a Novel Low-Cost Automated Flux Chamber for Real-Time Monitoring of VOCs Emissions at Contaminated Sites

Nicolò Tonolo, Alessandra Cecconi, Srey Mom Vuth, Mario Regine, Donato Abruzzese, Daniele Carnevale, Alessandro Bigi, Sergio Teggi, Simona Berardi, Maria Paola Bogliolo and Iason Verginelli

Environ. Sci. Technol., 2025, 59, 8221
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5c02365

Insights into the utility of small form air quality monitoring in health care environments: lessons learned from the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

Nicole Cowell, Clarissa Baldo, Kawun Williams, Catherine Muller, Siqi Hou, Daniel Rooney, Jian Zhong, Scarlett Healey, William James Bloss and Suzanne E. Bartington

Front. Public Health, 2025, 13
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1634075

Surface distributions and vertical profiles of trace gases (CO, O3, NO, NO2) in the Arctic wintertime boundary layer using low-cost sensors during ALPACA-2022

Brice Barret, Patrice Medina, Natalie Brett, Roman Pohorsky, Kathy S. Law, Slimane Bekki, Gilberto J. Fochesatto, Julia Schmale, Steve R. Arnold, Andrea Baccarini, Maurizio Busetto, Meeta Cesler-Maloney, Barbara D'Anna, Stefano Decesari, Jingqiu Mao, Gianluca Pappaccogli, Joel Savarino, Federico Scoto and William R. Simpson

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2025, 18, 1163
DOI: 10.5194/amt-18-1163-2025

Deployment, Calibration, and Cross-Validation of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors for Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Oxides, and Ozone for an Epidemiological Study

Christopher Zuidema, Cooper S. Schumacher, Elena Austin, Graeme Carvlin, Timothy V. Larson, Elizabeth W. Spalt, Marina Zusman, Amanda J. Gassett, Edmund Seto, Joel D. Kaufman and Lianne Sheppard

Sensors, 2021, 21, 4214
DOI: 10.3390/s21124214

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in primary school environments: Levels and potential risks

Marta Oliveira, Klara Slezakova, Joana Madureira, Eduardo de Oliveira Fernandes, Cristina Delerue-Matos, Simone Morais and Maria do Carmo Pereira

Science of The Total Environment, 2017, 575, 1156
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.195

Feasibility of low-cost particulate matter sensors for long-term environmental monitoring: Field evaluation and calibration

Zikang Feng, Lina Zheng, Bilin Ren, Dou Liu, Jing Huang and Ning Xue

Science of The Total Environment, 2024, 945, 174089
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174089

Effect of aerosol composition on the performance of low-cost optical particle counter correction factors

Leigh R. Crilley, Ajit Singh, Louisa J. Kramer, Marvin D. Shaw, Mohammed S. Alam, Joshua S. Apte, William J. Bloss, Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz, Pingqing Fu, Weiqi Fu, Shahzad Gani, Michael Gatari, Evgenia Ilyinskaya, Alastair C. Lewis, David Ng'ang'a, Yele Sun, Rachel C. W. Whitty, Siyao Yue, Stuart Young and Francis D. Pope

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2020, 13, 1181
DOI: 10.5194/amt-13-1181-2020

A Dual-Path Deep Learning Model for Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Calibration

Pang-Chun Liu, Ting-I. Chou, Shih-Wen Chiu and Kea-Tiong Tang

IEEE Sensors J., 2024, 24, 39914
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3472291

Amperometric Gas Sensors as a Low Cost Emerging Technology Platform for Air Quality Monitoring Applications: A Review

Ronan Baron and John Saffell

ACS Sens., 2017, 2, 1553
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00620

Opportunities for Low‐Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Filter Emission Measurements

Almuth D. Schwarz, Jörg Meyer and Achim Dittler

Chem Eng & Technol, 2018, 41, 1826
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201800209

The Smart Ring Experience in l’Aquila (Italy): Integrating Smart Mobility Public Services with Air Quality Indexes

Maria-Gabriella Villani, Fabio Cignini, Fernando Ortenzi, Domenico Suriano and Mario Prato

Chemosensors, 2016, 4, 24
DOI: 10.3390/chemosensors4040024

Validate personal air-pollution sensors

Alastair Lewis and Peter Edwards

Nature, 2016, 535, 29
DOI: 10.1038/535029a

End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet?

Johanna Amalia Robinson, David Kocman, Milena Horvat and Alena Bartonova

Sensors, 2018, 18, 3768
DOI: 10.3390/s18113768

Low cost air pollution monitoring systems: A review of protocols and enabling technologies

Zeba Idrees and Lirong Zheng

Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2020, 17, 100123
DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2019.100123

First-Principles Algorithm for Air Quality Electrochemical Gas Sensors

Bin Ouyang

ACS Sens., 2020, 5, 2742
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.0c01129

State of the Art and Future Perspectives of Atmospheric Chemical Sensing Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Bibliometric Analysis

Diego Bedin Marin, Valentina Becciolini, Lucas Santos Santana, Giuseppe Rossi and Matteo Barbari

Sensors, 2023, 23, 8384
DOI: 10.3390/s23208384

Using statistical methods to carry out in field calibrations of low cost air quality sensors

José María Cordero, Rafael Borge and Adolfo Narros

Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2018, 267, 245
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.04.021

Mapping Occupational Hazards with a Multi-sensor Network in a Heavy-Vehicle Manufacturing Facility

Christopher Zuidema, Sinan Sousan, Larissa V Stebounova, Alyson Gray, Xiaoxing Liu, Marcus Tatum, Oliver Stroh, Geb Thomas, Thomas Peters and Kirsten Koehler

Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 2019, 63, 280
DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxy111

Evaluation of a cost-effective roadside sensor platform for identifying high emitters

Yicheng Shen, Qiang Zhang, Dongbin Wang, Miao Tian, Quanshun Yu, Junfang Wang, Hang Yin, Shaojun Zhang, Jiming Hao and Jingkun Jiang

Science of The Total Environment, 2022, 816, 151609
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151609

A citizen science approach for enhancing public understanding of air pollution

Sachit Mahajan, Prashant Kumar, Janaina Antonino Pinto, Agnese Riccetti, Katinka Schaaf, Guillem Camprodon, Viktor Smári, Antonella Passani and Giuseppe Forino

Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 52, 101800
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101800

Solution to the Problem of Calibration of Low-Cost Air Quality Measurement Sensors in Networks

Georgia Miskell, Jennifer A. Salmond and David E. Williams

ACS Sens., 2018, 3, 832
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.8b00074

Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration

Colby Buehler, Fulizi Xiong, Misti Levy Zamora, Kate M. Skog, Joseph Kohrman-Glaser, Stefan Colton, Michael McNamara, Kevin Ryan, Carrie Redlich, Matthew Bartos, Brandon Wong, Branko Kerkez, Kirsten Koehler and Drew R. Gentner

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2021, 14, 995
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-995-2021

Validity, reliability and acceptability of wearable sensor devices to monitor personal exposure to air pollution and pollen: A systematic review of mobility based exposure studies

Wako Golicha Wako, Tom Clemens, Scott Ogletree, Andrew James Williams and Ruth Jepson

Building and Environment, 2025, 277, 112931
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112931

Identification of indoor air quality events using a K-means clustering analysis of gas sensors data

Alexandre Caron, Nathalie Redon, Patrice Coddeville and Benjamin Hanoune

Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2019, 297, 126709
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.126709

Air Quality in Puerto Rico in the Aftermath of Hurricane Maria: A Case Study on the Use of Lower Cost Air Quality Monitors

R. Subramanian, Aja Ellis, Elvis Torres-Delgado, Rebecca Tanzer, Carl Malings, Felipe Rivera, Maité Morales, Darrel Baumgardner, Albert Presto and Olga L. Mayol-Bracero

ACS Earth Space Chem., 2018, 2, 1179
DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00079

Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado

Stephen Feinberg, Ron Williams, Gayle S. W. Hagler, Joshua Rickard, Ryan Brown, Daniel Garver, Greg Harshfield, Phillip Stauffer, Erick Mattson, Robert Judge and Sam Garvey

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2018, 11, 4605
DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-4605-2018

Practical Field Calibration of Portable Monitors for Mobile Measurements of Multiple Air Pollutants

Chun Lin, Nicola Masey, Hao Wu, Mark Jackson, David Carruthers, Stefan Reis, Ruth Doherty, Iain Beverland and Mathew Heal

Atmosphere, 2017, 8, 231
DOI: 10.3390/atmos8120231

Understanding the ability of low-cost MOx sensors to quantify ambient VOCs

Ashley M. Collier-Oxandale, Jacob Thorson, Hannah Halliday, Jana Milford and Michael Hannigan

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2019, 12, 1441
DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-1441-2019

On Memory-Based Precise Calibration of Cost-Efficient NO2 Sensor Using Artificial Intelligence and Global Response Correction

Slawomir Koziel, Anna Pietrenko-Dabrowska, Marek Wojcikowski and Bogdan Pankiewicz

Knowledge-Based Systems, 2024, 290, 111564
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111564

Development of a Portable and Low-Cost Sensor System for Air Pollution Measurement

Zike Wang, Linqiang Ma, Ruixuan Yang and Jianhuai Ye

Aerosol Sci Eng, 2026, 10, 90
DOI: 10.1007/s41810-025-00284-6

Evaluation and calibration of a low-cost particle sensor in ambient conditions using machine-learning methods

Minxing Si, Ying Xiong, Shan Du and Ke Du

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2020, 13, 1693
DOI: 10.5194/amt-13-1693-2020

Breathing chemicals: a review of air pollution over the years

Alex-Ionuț Totolici, Silvia Mitrea, Anghel Tudor Cioloca, Andrei Lupu, Patricia Mercedes Móricz Móricz, Daria Muntean, Raluca Negre, Andra Topîrceanu, Mara Țoc and Dumitrana Iordache

Studia UBB Biologia, 2022, 67, 177
DOI: 10.24193/subbbiol.2022.1.10

Machine learning calibration of low-cost NO2 and PM10 sensors: non-linear algorithms and their impact on site transferability

Peer Nowack, Lev Konstantinovskiy, Hannah Gardiner and John Cant

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2021, 14, 5637
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-5637-2021

Field evaluation of low-cost electrochemical air quality gas sensors under extreme temperature and relative humidity conditions

Roubina Papaconstantinou, Marios Demosthenous, Spyros Bezantakos, Neoclis Hadjigeorgiou, Marinos Costi, Melina Stylianou, Elli Symeou, Chrysanthos Savvides and George Biskos

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2023, 16, 3313
DOI: 10.5194/amt-16-3313-2023

Development and machine learning-based calibration of low-cost multiparametric stations for the measurement of CO2 and CH4 in air

R. Biagi, M. Ferrari, S. Venturi, M. Sacco, G. Montegrossi and F. Tassi

Heliyon, 2024, 10, e29772
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29772

Unravelling a black box: an open-source methodology for the field calibration of small air quality sensors

Seán Schmitz, Sherry Towers, Guillermo Villena, Alexandre Caseiro, Robert Wegener, Dieter Klemp, Ines Langer, Fred Meier and Erika von Schneidemesser

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2021, 14, 7221
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-7221-2021

Thermochemical gas analyzer readiness assessment model

I. V. Samarin, A. V. Kryuchkov and A. Yu. Strogonov

Požarovzryvobezopasnostʹ, 2021, 29, 61
DOI: 10.22227/PVB.2020.29.06.61-74

Assessment of indoor air quality improvement using an IoT sensor-based context-aware mobile air purification system: A residential field study

Shin-Young Park, Ji-Yun Ceong, Kwangchul Noh, Jong-Sun Kim and Cheol-Min Lee

J. Odor Indoor Environ., 2025, 24, 367
DOI: 10.15250/joie.2025.24.4.367

The calculation of the regulated number of remote sensors of gas analyzers surrounding rectangular outdoor facilities at oil refineries

I. V. Samarin, A. V. Kryuchkov and A. Yu. Strogonov

Požarovzryvobezopasnostʹ, 2022, 31, 33
DOI: 10.22227/0869-7493.2022.31.02.33-40

Challenge of integrated low-cost emission monitoring system into a digital information system

A M Simbolon, J A Fatkhurrahman, A Mariani, I R J Sari, Syafrudin and Sudarno

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 2021, 623, 012076
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/623/1/012076

Development of miniaturized autonomous and versatile gas chromatograph for Volatile Organic Compounds monitoring using Nano-Gravimetric-Detector

Malak Rizk-Bigourd, Cécile Gaimoz, Eric Colinet, Jean-Pierre Pineau, Vincent Guerreni, Vivien Tranier, Fabrice Bertrand, David Coscia, Anaïs Feron, Michel Cabane, Cyril Szopa, Patrice Coll, Agnès Borbon and François Ravetta

Journal of Chromatography Open, 2025, 7, 100202
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcoa.2024.100202

Cost-Efficient measurement platform and machine-learning-based sensor calibration for precise NO2 pollution monitoring

Anna Pietrenko-Dabrowska, Slawomir Koziel, Marek Wojcikowski, Bogdan Pankiewicz, Artur Rydosz, Tuan-Vu Cao and Krystian Wojtkiewicz

Measurement, 2024, 237, 115168
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115168

An approach to modeling the maintenance of stationary thermochemical gas analyzers at an oil refinery

I. V. Samarin, A. V. Kryuchkov and A. Yu. Strogonov

Požarovzryvobezopasnostʹ, 2022, 31, 40
DOI: 10.22227/0869-7493.2022.31.01.40-48

Comparing spatial and temporal variabilities between the Vaisala AQT530 monitor and reference measurements

Roubina Papaconstantinou, Spyros Bezantakos, Michael Pikridas, Moreno Parolin, Melina Stylianou, Chrysanthos Savvides, Jean Sciare and George Biskos

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2026, 19, 63
DOI: 10.5194/amt-19-63-2026

Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor

Zheyuan Pei, Maxim Balitskiy, Ryan Thalman and Kerry E. Kelly

Sensors, 2023, 23, 7444
DOI: 10.3390/s23177444

Understanding social and behavioral drivers and impacts of air quality sensor use

Bryan J. Hubbell, Amanda Kaufman, Louie Rivers, Kayla Schulte, Gayle Hagler, Jane Clougherty, Wayne Cascio and Dan Costa

Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 621, 886
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.275

Statistical data pre-processing and time series incorporation for high-efficacy calibration of low-cost NO2 sensor using machine learning

Slawomir Koziel, Anna Pietrenko-Dabrowska, Marek Wojcikowski and Bogdan Pankiewicz

Sci Rep, 2024, 14
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59993-6

Air Pollution Monitoring via Wireless Sensor Networks: The Investigation and Correction of the Aging Behavior of Electrochemical Gaseous Pollutant Sensors

Ioannis Christakis, Odysseas Tsakiridis, Dionisis Kandris and Ilias Stavrakas

Electronics, 2023, 12, 1842
DOI: 10.3390/electronics12081842

Automated data scanning for dense networks of low-cost air quality instruments: Detection and differentiation of instrumental error and local to regional scale environmental abnormalities

Maryam Alavi-Shoshtari, Jennifer Ann Salmond, Ciprian Doru Giurcăneanu, Georgia Miskell, Lena Weissert and David Edward Williams

Environmental Modelling & Software, 2018, 101, 34
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.002

Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring

Leigh R. Crilley, Marvin Shaw, Ryan Pound, Louisa J. Kramer, Robin Price, Stuart Young, Alastair C. Lewis and Francis D. Pope

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2018, 11, 709
DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-709-2018

Air pollution dispersal in high density urban areas: Research on the triadic relation of wind, air pollution, and urban form

Junyan Yang, Beixiang Shi, Yi Shi, Simon Marvin, Yi Zheng and Geyang Xia

Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 54, 101941
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101941

Efficient and Automated Generation of Orthogonal Atmospheres for the Characterization of Low-Cost Gas Sensor Systems in Air Quality Monitoring

Georgi Tancev, Andreas Ackermann, Gerald Schaller and Celine Pascale

IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2022, 71, 1
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2022.3198747

Using A Low-Cost Sensor Array and Machine Learning Techniques to Detect Complex Pollutant Mixtures and Identify Likely Sources

Jacob Thorson, Ashley Collier-Oxandale and Michael Hannigan

Sensors, 2019, 19, 3723
DOI: 10.3390/s19173723

Stochastic Drift Modeling for NDIR Gas Sensors: Separating Environmental Effects and Instrumental Drift

Cheng Yang, Gustav Bohlin and Tobias J. Oechtering

IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2026, 75, 1
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2026.3682797

Assessing the accuracy of commercially available gas sensors for the measurement of ambient ozone and nitrogen dioxide

Kelechi Isiugo, Nicholas Newman, Roman Jandarov, Sergey A. Grinshpun and Tiina Reponen

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2018, 15, 782
DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1513135

Anatomization of air quality prediction using neural networks, regression and hybrid models

Ameya Kshirsagar and Manan Shah

Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 369, 133383
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133383

Monitoring road traffic participants' exposure to PM10 using a low-cost system

Krzysztof Brzozowski, Andrzej Maczyński and Artur Ryguła

Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 728, 138718
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138718

Machine Learning–Assisted Thin-Film Transistor Characterization: A Case Study of Amorphous Indium Gallium Zinc Oxide (IGZO) Thin-Film Transistors

Jiwon Oh, Hyewon Song, Euncheol Shin, Heesun Yang, Jongtae Lim and Jin-Ha Hwang

ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol., 2022, 11, 055004
DOI: 10.1149/2162-8777/ac6894

Revisiting Atmospheric Oxidation Kinetics of Nitrogen Oxides: The Use of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors to Measure Reaction Kinetics

Steven M. Owen, Lachlan H. Yee and Damien T. Maher

Reactions, 2024, 5, 789
DOI: 10.3390/reactions5040040

The impacts of water vapour and co-pollutants on the performance of electrochemical gas sensors used for air quality monitoring

Xiaobing Pang, Marvin D. Shaw, Stefan Gillot and Alastair C. Lewis

Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2018, 266, 674
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.03.144

Performance evaluation of light weight gas sensor system suitable for airborne applications against co-location gas analysers over Delhi

A. Ahlawat, S.K. Mishra, S. Gumber, V. Goel, C. Sharma and A. Wiedensohler

Science of The Total Environment, 2019, 697, 134016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134016

Low-Cost Nitric Oxide Sensors: Assessment of Temperature and Humidity Effects

Steven Owen, Lachlan H. Yee and Damien T. Maher

Sensors, 2022, 22, 9013
DOI: 10.3390/s22229013

Field Test of Mini Photoionization Detector-Based Sensors—Monitoring of Volatile Organic Pollutants in Ambient Air

Jiří Bílek, Petr Maršolek, Ondřej Bílek and Pavel Buček

Environments, 2022, 9, 49
DOI: 10.3390/environments9040049

A systematic review of data mining and machine learning for air pollution epidemiology

Colin Bellinger, Mohomed Shazan Mohomed Jabbar, Osmar Zaïane and Alvaro Osornio-Vargas

BMC Public Health, 2017, 17
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4914-3

Low-cost sensors and microscale land use regression: Data fusion to resolve air quality variations with high spatial and temporal resolution

L.F. Weissert, K. Alberti, G. Miskell, W. Pattinson, J.A. Salmond, G. Henshaw and David E. Williams

Atmospheric Environment, 2019, 213, 285
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.019

Analytical Screening of Low-cost CO₂ Sensors for Clinical Infection Control Applications

Yo Ishigaki, Koji Enoki and Shinji Yokogawa

Journal of Clinical Engineering, 2026, 51, 70
DOI: 10.1097/JCE.0000000000000755

Temporal changes in field calibration relationships for Aeroqual S500 O3 and NO2 sensor-based monitors

Nicola Masey, Jonathan Gillespie, Eliani Ezani, Chun Lin, Hao Wu, Neil S. Ferguson, Scott Hamilton, Mathew R. Heal and Iain J. Beverland

Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2018, 273, 1800
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.087

Community-Based Health and Exposure Study around Urban Oil Developments in South Los Angeles

Bhavna Shamasunder, Ashley Collier-Oxandale, Jessica Blickley, James Sadd, Marissa Chan, Sandy Navarro, Michael Hannigan and Nicole Wong

IJERPH, 2018, 15, 138
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010138

An Improved Sensor Calibration with Anomaly Detection and Removal

Xinwei Fang and Iain Bate

Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2020, 307, 127428
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127428

Schoolchildren’s exposure to PM2.5: a student club–based air quality monitoring campaign using low-cost sensors

L.-W. Antony Chen, John O. Olawepo, Felicia Bonanno, Aman Gebreselassie and Mi Zhang

Air Qual Atmos Health, 2020, 13, 543
DOI: 10.1007/s11869-020-00815-9

Distant calibration of low-cost PM and NO2 sensors; evidence from multiple sensor testbeds

Jelle Hofman, Mania Nikolaou, Sharada Prasad Shantharam, Christophe Stroobants, Sander Weijs and Valerio Panzica La Manna

Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2022, 13, 101246
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2021.101246

End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring

Aakash C. Rai, Prashant Kumar, Francesco Pilla, Andreas N. Skouloudis, Silvana Di Sabatino, Carlo Ratti, Ansar Yasar and David Rickerby

Science of The Total Environment, 2017, 607-608, 691
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.266

MAIC: Metalearning-Based Adaptive In-Field Calibration for IoT Air Quality Monitoring System

Ning Liu, Zhiyuan Wu, Guodong Li, Xinyu Liu, Yue Wang and Lin Zhang

IEEE Internet Things J., 2022, 9, 15928
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3150849

Development of a reliable measurement station for air quality monitoring based on low-cost sensors and active redundancy

Sylvain Poupry, Cédrick Béler and Kamal Medjaher

IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2022, 55, 7
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.631

CLEAN - Collaborative low-cost environmental and air-quality network

Fernando Campo, Davide Franco, Felipe de Campos Santos, Andy Blanco-Rodríguez, Alejandro Rafael Garcia-Ramirez, Gabriel Ratão and Leonardo Hoinaski

Environmental Modelling & Software, 2023, 163, 105664
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105664

Estimating personal exposures from a multi-hazard sensor network

Christopher Zuidema, Larissa V. Stebounova, Sinan Sousan, Alyson Gray, Oliver Stroh, Geb Thomas, Thomas Peters and Kirsten Koehler

J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 2020, 30, 1013
DOI: 10.1038/s41370-019-0146-1

Data reliability and fault diagnostic for air quality monitoring station based on low cost sensors and active redundancy

Sylvain Poupry, Kamal Medjaher and Cédrick Béler

Measurement, 2023, 223, 113800
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113800

Environmental Quality bOX (EQ-OX): A Portable Device Embedding Low-Cost Sensors Tailored for Comprehensive Indoor Environmental Quality Monitoring

Jacopo Corona, Stefano Tondini, Duccio Gallichi Nottiani, Riccardo Scilla, Andrea Gambaro, Wilmer Pasut, Francesco Babich and Roberto Lollini

Sensors, 2024, 24, 2176
DOI: 10.3390/s24072176

Evaluating the transferability of low-cost sensor calibration using ANFIS: a field study in Putrajaya, Malaysia

Kemal Maulana Alhasa, Mohd Shahrul Mohd Nadzir, Sawal Hamid Md Ali and Wahyu Sasongko Putro

Environ Monit Assess, 2025, 197
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-025-14377-9

What does success look like for air quality policy? A perspective

Paul S. Monks and Martin L. Williams

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A., 2020, 378, 20190326
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0326

Evaluating the performance and influencing factors of three portable black carbon monitors for field measurement

Liqing Wu, Yicheng Shen, Fei Che, Yuzhe Zhang, Jian Gao and Chong Wang

Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2024, 139, 320
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2023.05.044

PECULIARITIES OF IMPROVEMENT OF SAFETY MEASURES FOR THE POPULATION IN ACCIDENTS WITH DOMESTIC GAS LEAKAGE IN THE ARCTIC ZONE

Oleg Savchuk

NATURAL AND MAN-MADE RISKS (PHYSICO-MATHEMATICAL AND APPLIED ASPECTS), 2025, 2025, 27
DOI: 10.61260/2307-7476-2025-1-27-34

Performance characterization of low-cost air quality sensors for off-grid deployment in rural Malawi

Ashley S. Bittner, Eben S. Cross, David H. Hagan, Carl Malings, Eric Lipsky and Andrew P. Grieshop

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2022, 15, 3353
DOI: 10.5194/amt-15-3353-2022

Use of electrochemical sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response and validating measurements

Eben S. Cross, Leah R. Williams, David K. Lewis, Gregory R. Magoon, Timothy B. Onasch, Michael L. Kaminsky, Douglas R. Worsnop and John T. Jayne

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2017, 10, 3575
DOI: 10.5194/amt-10-3575-2017

A New Black Carbon Sensor for Dense Air Quality Monitoring Networks

Julien Caubel, Troy Cados and Thomas Kirchstetter

Sensors, 2018, 18, 738
DOI: 10.3390/s18030738

Measured and perceived indoor air quality in three low-energy wooden test buildings

Tuomas Alapieti, Camilla Vornanen-Winqvist, Raimo Mikkola and Heidi Salonen

Wood Material Science & Engineering, 2023, 18, 827
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2022.2077657

Selection and evaluation of commercial low-cost devices for indoor air quality monitoring in schools

J.P. Sá, H. Chojer, P.T.B.S. Branco, A. Forstmaier, M.C.M. Alvim-Ferraz, F.G. Martins and S.I.V. Sousa

Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 98, 110952
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110952

Hierarchical network design for nitrogen dioxide measurement in urban environments

Lena Weissert, Elaine Miles, Georgia Miskell, Kyle Alberti, Brandon Feenstra, Geoff S. Henshaw, Vasileios Papapostolou, Hamesh Patel, Andrea Polidori, Jennifer A. Salmond and David E. Williams

Atmospheric Environment, 2020, 228, 117428
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117428

Spatial and temporal mapping of transport emissions and application of air quality models using low cost sensor data

P.J. Pérez-Martínez, A. Moreira, F.R. Teixeira, R.M. Miranda, M.F. Andrade, S. Espezua, E. Villanueva and P. Kumar

Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2025, 22, 101622
DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101622

Enhancing accuracy of air quality sensors with machine learning to augment large-scale monitoring networks

Khaiwal Ravindra, Sahil Kumar, Abhishek Kumar and Suman Mor

npj Clim Atmos Sci, 2024, 7
DOI: 10.1038/s41612-024-00833-9

Measuring Spatial and Temporal PM2.5 Variations in Sacramento, California, Communities Using a Network of Low-Cost Sensors

Anondo Mukherjee, Steven G. Brown, Michael C. McCarthy, Nathan R. Pavlovic, Levi G. Stanton, Janice Lam Snyder, Stephen D’Andrea and Hilary R. Hafner

Sensors, 2019, 19, 4701
DOI: 10.3390/s19214701

Airborne particulate matter monitoring in Kenya using calibrated low-cost sensors

Francis D. Pope, Michael Gatari, David Ng'ang'a, Alexander Poynter and Rhiannon Blake

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2018, 18, 15403
DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-15403-2018

EEATC: A Novel Calibration Approach for Low-Cost Sensors

M. V. Narayana, Devendra Jalihal and S. M. Shiva Nagendra

IEEE Sensors J., 2023, 23, 23500
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3304366

Sorption Kinetics of Poly(ethyleneimine)–Poly(ethylene Oxide) Blends and the Implication for Low-Cost, Small-Scale CO2 Sensors

Zachary A. Siefker, John N. Hodul, Carsten Flores-Hansen, George T.-C. Chiu, James E. Braun, Jeffrey F. Rhoads and Bryan W. Boudouris

ACS Appl. Polym. Mater., 2022, 4, 4389
DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.2c00361

Assessing the effects of mobility on air quality: The Liverpool Smart Pedestrian project

Nicolas Verstaevel, Johan Barthélemy, Hugh Forehead, Bilal Arshad and Pascal Perez

Transportation Research Procedia, 2020, 48, 2197
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.276

Electrochemical sensors on board a Zeppelin NT: in-flight evaluation of low-cost trace gas measurements

Tobias Schuldt, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Christian Wesolek, Franz Rohrer, Benjamin Winter, Thomas A. J. Kuhlbusch, Astrid Kiendler-Scharr and Ralf Tillmann

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2023, 16, 373
DOI: 10.5194/amt-16-373-2023

Evaluating uncertainty in sensor networks for urban air pollution insights

Daniel R. Peters, Olalekan A. M. Popoola, Roderic L. Jones, Nicholas A. Martin, Jim Mills, Elizabeth R. Fonseca, Amy Stidworthy, Ella Forsyth, David Carruthers, Megan Dupuy-Todd, Felicia Douglas, Katie Moore, Rishabh U. Shah, Lauren E. Padilla and Ramón A. Alvarez

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2022, 15, 321
DOI: 10.5194/amt-15-321-2022

Application of low-cost particulate matter sensors for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment in underground mines: A review

Nana A. Amoah, Guang Xu, Yang Wang, Jiayu Li, Yongming Zou and Baisheng Nie

Int J Miner Metall Mater, 2022, 29, 1475
DOI: 10.1007/s12613-021-2378-z

Field calibration of electrochemical NO2 sensors in a citizen science context

Bas Mijling, Qijun Jiang, Dave de Jonge and Stefano Bocconi

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2018, 11, 1297
DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-1297-2018

Application of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors to Aqueous Systems to Allow Automated Determination of NH3 and H2S in Water

Malcolm Cämmerer, Thomas Mayer, Stefanie Penzel, Mathias Rudolph and Helko Borsdorf

Sensors, 2020, 20, 2814
DOI: 10.3390/s20102814

Analysing the performance of low-cost air quality sensors, their drivers, relative benefits and calibration in cities—a case study in Sheffield

Said Munir, Martin Mayfield, Daniel Coca, Stephen A. Jubb and Ogo Osammor

Environ Monit Assess, 2019, 191
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7231-8

Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors: Biases, Corrections and Challenges in Their Comparability

Idris Hayward, Nicholas A. Martin, Valerio Ferracci, Mohsen Kazemimanesh and Prashant Kumar

Atmosphere, 2024, 15, 1523
DOI: 10.3390/atmos15121523

Practical and Efficient: A Pocket-Sized Device Enabling Detection of Formaldehyde Adulteration in Vegetables

Hanying Zhang, Zhiyuan Wu, Zinan Zhi, Wanshuo Gao, Wentao Sun, Zhongqiu Hua and Yi Wu

ACS Omega, 2022, 7, 160
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04229

Structured decision making: a tool for systems insights into the barriers, synergies and co-benefits for urban air quality action

Nicole Hannah Cowell, Aoife Kirk, Hannah Murdock, Edward Sudall and Audrey de Nazelle

Urban Transitions, 2025, 1, 100005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ubtr.2025.100005

Using Vehicles’ Rendezvous for In Situ Calibration of Instruments in Fleet Vehicle-Based Air Pollution Mobile Monitoring

Jianbang Xiang, Elena Austin, Timothy Gould, Timothy Larson, Michael Yost, Jeffry Shirai, Yisi Liu, Sukyong Yun and Edmund Seto

Environ. Sci. Technol., 2020, 54, 4286
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00612

A Survey on Sensor Calibration in Air Pollution Monitoring Deployments

Balz Maag, Zimu Zhou and Lothar Thiele

IEEE Internet Things J., 2018, 5, 4857
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2853660

Structuring an integrated air quality monitoring network in large urban areas – Discussing the purpose, criteria and deployment strategy

Said Munir, Martin Mayfield, Daniel Coca and Stephen A. Jubb

Atmospheric Environment: X, 2019, 2, 100027
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100027

Evaluation of the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors at a High Mountain Station with Complex Meteorological Conditions

Hongyong Li, Yujiao Zhu, Yong Zhao, Tianshu Chen, Ying Jiang, Ye Shan, Yuhong Liu, Jiangshan Mu, Xiangkun Yin, Di Wu, Cheng Zhang, Shuchun Si, Xinfeng Wang, Wenxing Wang and Likun Xue

Atmosphere, 2020, 11, 212
DOI: 10.3390/atmos11020212

Unexpected Performance Improvements of Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone Sensors by Including Carbon Monoxide Sensor Signal

Md Hasibul Hasan, Haofei Yu, Cesunica Ivey, Ajay Pillarisetti, Ziyang Yuan, Khanh Do and Yi Li

ACS Omega, 2023, 8, 5917
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07734

The use of low-cost sensors for air quality analysis in road intersections

Krzysztof Brzozowski, Artur Ryguła and Andrzej Maczyński

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019, 77, 198
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.10.019

A Variational Bayesian Blind Calibration Approach for Air Quality Sensor Deployments

Guodong Li, Zhiyuan Wu, Ning Liu, Xinyu Liu, Yue Wang and Lin Zhang

IEEE Sensors J., 2023, 23, 7129
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3212009

Physically interpretable partitioned temperature-dependent calibration for wide-range electrochemical gas sensors

Yicheng Wang, Gang Li, Xiaoyang Yang, Yuanguan Gao, Kuiquan Duan, Qiuyue Ma, Kwonho Jeon and Hyeogki Chae

Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2026, 457, 139734
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2026.139734

Short-Term Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors Operated by the “AirSensEUR” Platform

Alexander Pichlhöfer and Azra Korjenic

Energies, 2022, 15, 5688
DOI: 10.3390/en15155688

Modelling calibration uncertainty in networks of environmental sensors

Michael Thomas Smith, Magnus Ross, Joel Ssematimba, Mauricio A Álvarez, Engineer Bainomugisha and Richard Wilkinson

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 2023, 72, 1187
DOI: 10.1093/jrsssc/qlad075

High Performance Colorimetric Carbon Monoxide Sensor for Continuous Personal Exposure Monitoring

Chenwen Lin, Xiaojun Xian, Xingcai Qin, Di Wang, Francis Tsow, Erica Forzani and Nongjian Tao

ACS Sens., 2018, 3, 327
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00722

A Distributed Network of 100 Black Carbon Sensors for 100 Days of Air Quality Monitoring in West Oakland, California

Julien J. Caubel, Troy E. Cados, Chelsea V. Preble and Thomas W. Kirchstetter

Environ. Sci. Technol., 2019, 53, 7564
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00282

Investigation of indoor air quality in a low energy high school building combining micro gas sensors and unsupervised learning

B Hanoune, A Caron, N Redon and P Coddeville

IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 609, 042027
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/609/4/042027

Relevance and Reliability of Outdoor SO2 Monitoring in Low-Income Countries Using Low-Cost Sensors

Rosa Amalia González Rivero, Olivier Schalm, Arianna Alvarez Cruz, Erik Hernández Rodríguez, Mayra C. Morales Pérez, Daniellys Alejo Sánchez, Alain Martinez Laguardia, Werner Jacobs and Luis Hernández Santana

Atmosphere, 2023, 14, 912
DOI: 10.3390/atmos14060912

Calibration and assessment of electrochemical air quality sensors by co-location with regulatory-grade instruments

David H. Hagan, Gabriel Isaacman-VanWertz, Jonathan P. Franklin, Lisa M. M. Wallace, Benjamin D. Kocar, Colette L. Heald and Jesse H. Kroll

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2018, 11, 315
DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-315-2018

Urban Air Quality Management at Low Cost Using Micro Air Sensors: A Case Study from Accra, Ghana

Collins Gameli Hodoli, Iq Mead, Frederic Coulon, Cesunica E. Ivey, Victoria Owusu Tawiah, Garima Raheja, James Nimo, Allison Hughes, Achim Haug, Anika Krause, Selina Amoah, Maxwell Sunu, John K. Nyante, Esi Nerquaye Tetteh, Véronique Riffault and Carl Malings

ACS EST Air, 2025, 2, 201
DOI: 10.1021/acsestair.4c00172

Field Calibration and Evaluation of an Internet-of-Things-Based Particulate Matter Sensor

Nicole Cowell, Lee Chapman, William Bloss and Francis Pope

Front. Environ. Sci., 2022, 9
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.798485

Review of low-cost sensors for indoor air quality: Features and applications

Milagros Ródenas García, Andrea Spinazzé, Pedro T.B.S. Branco, Francesca Borghi, Guillermo Villena, Andrea Cattaneo, Alessia Di Gilio, Victor G. Mihucz, Elena Gómez Álvarez, Sérgio Ivan Lopes, Benjamin Bergmans, Cezary Orłowski, Kostas Karatzas, Gonçalo Marques, John Saffell and Sofia I.V. Sousa

Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, 2022, 57, 747
DOI: 10.1080/05704928.2022.2085734

UAV-Based Hybrid Fuzzy Inference Framework for Symmetry and Asymmetry in Real-Time Air Quality Monitoring

Svetlana Beryozkina and Inga Zicmane

Symmetry, 2025, 17, 2048
DOI: 10.3390/sym17122048

Conception and deployment of the APOLLINE sensor network for IAQ monitoring

B Hanoune, R Kassi, B Verbeke, E Assy, L Clavier, S Crumeyrolle, S Degrande, X Le Pallec and R Rouvoy

IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 609, 042026
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/609/4/042026

New understanding of miniaturized VOCs monitoring device: PID-type sensors performance evaluations in ambient air

Wei Xu, Yunfei Cai, Song Gao, Shuang Hou, Yong Yang, Yusen Duan, Qingyan Fu, Fei Chen and Jie Wu

Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2021, 330, 129285
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.129285

Effects of Calcination Temperature Induced High-sensitivity N,N-dimethylformamide Gas-Sensing Performances Over LaFeO3 Nanoparticles

Shuang Liang, Dan-Dan Wu, Hui-Ru Zhang, Li-Ling Liu, Chu-Geng Huang and Guo-Jian Jiang

J. Electrochem. Soc., 2023, 170, 057514
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/acd4f3

Developing a Low-Cost Wearable Personal Exposure Monitor for Studying Respiratory Diseases Using Metal–Oxide Sensors

Kyle R. Mallires, Di Wang, Vishal Varun Tipparaju and Nongjian Tao

IEEE Sensors J., 2019, 19, 8252
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2917435

Low-Cost Sensor Systems and IoT Technologies for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring: Instrumentation, Models, Implementation, and Perspectives for Validation

Sérgio Ivan Lopes, Cezary Orłowski, Pedro T. B. S. Branco, Kostas Karatzas, Guillermo Villena, John Saffell, Gonçalo Marques, Sofia I. V. Sousa, Fabian Lenartz, Benjamin Bergmans, Alessandro Bigi, Tamás Pflanzner and Mila Ródenas García

Sensors, 2025, 25, 7567
DOI: 10.3390/s25247567

Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Tools: From Research to Practice (A Workshop Summary)

Andrea L. Clements, William G. Griswold, Abhijit RS, Jill E. Johnston, Megan M. Herting, Jacob Thorson, Ashley Collier-Oxandale and Michael Hannigan

Sensors, 2017, 17, 2478
DOI: 10.3390/s17112478

Advances in Application of Air Quality Sensors in Environmental Monitoring

英石宋

AEP, 2019, 09, 259
DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2019.93037

Applicability of factory calibrated optical particle counters for high-density air quality monitoring networks in Ghana

C. Gameli Hodoli, F. Coulon and M.I. Mead

Heliyon, 2020, 6, e04206
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04206

Sens-BERT: A BERT-Based Approach for Enabling Transferability and Re-Calibration of Calibration Models for Low-Cost Sensors Under Reference Measurements Scarcity

M. V. Narayana, Kranthi Kumar Rachavarapu, Devendra Jalihal and S. M. Shiva Nagendra

IEEE Sensors J., 2024, 24, 11362
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3362962

Laboratory Cross-Sensitivity Evaluation of Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensors

Zheyuan Pei and Kerry E. Kelly

Sensors, 2025, 25, 3096
DOI: 10.3390/s25103096

Wireless Sensor Network Combined with Cloud Computing for Air Quality Monitoring

Patricia Arroyo, José Luis Herrero, José Ignacio Suárez and Jesús Lozano

Sensors, 2019, 19, 691
DOI: 10.3390/s19030691

Data imputation in in situ-measured particle size distributions by means of neural networks

Pak Lun Fung, Martha Arbayani Zaidan, Ola Surakhi, Sasu Tarkoma, Tuukka Petäjä and Tareq Hussein

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2021, 14, 5535
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-5535-2021

An improved low-power measurement of ambient NO2 and O3 combining electrochemical sensor clusters and machine learning

Kate R. Smith, Peter M. Edwards, Peter D. Ivatt, James D. Lee, Freya Squires, Chengliang Dai, Richard E. Peltier, Mat J. Evans, Yele Sun and Alastair C. Lewis

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2019, 12, 1325
DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-1325-2019

Efficacy of Paired Electrochemical Sensors for Measuring Ozone Concentrations

Christopher Zuidema, Nima Afshar-Mohajer, Marcus Tatum, Geb Thomas, Thomas Peters and Kirsten Koehler

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2019, 16, 179
DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1540872

Reliability of Lower-Cost Sensors in the Analysis of Indoor Air Quality on Board Ships

Olivier Schalm, Gustavo Carro, Borislav Lazarov, Werner Jacobs and Marianne Stranger

Atmosphere, 2022, 13, 1579
DOI: 10.3390/atmos13101579

Chemical Sensor Technologies for Sustainable Development: Recent Advances, Classification, and Environmental Monitoring

Abel Inobeme, Arunadevi Natarajan, Safalmani Pradhan, Charles Oluwaseun Adetunji, Alexander Ikechukwu Ajai, Jonathan Inobeme, Mathew John Tsado, John Olusanya Jacob, Shyam S. Pandey, Kshitij RB Singh and Jay Singh

Advanced Sensor Research, 2024, 3
DOI: 10.1002/adsr.202400066

Are dense networks of low-cost nodes really useful for monitoring air pollution? A case study in Staffordshire

Louise Bøge Frederickson, Ruta Sidaraviciute, Johan Albrecht Schmidt, Ole Hertel and Matthew Stanley Johnson

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2022, 22, 13949
DOI: 10.5194/acp-22-13949-2022

Preparation of low-concentration H2 test gas mixtures in ambient air for calibration of H2 sensors

Niklas Karbach, Lisa Höhler, Peter Hoor, Heiko Bozem, Nicole Bobrowski and Thorsten Hoffmann

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2024, 17, 4081
DOI: 10.5194/amt-17-4081-2024

Estimation of particulate matter and gaseous concentrations using low-cost sensors from broiler houses

Roheela Yasmeen, Zulfiqar Ali, Sean Tyrrel and Zaheer Ahmad Nasir

Environ Monit Assess, 2019, 191
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7582-1

Selective formaldehyde detection at ppb in indoor air with a portable sensor

Jan van den Broek, David Klein Cerrejon, Sotiris E. Pratsinis and Andreas T. Güntner

Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 399, 123052
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123052

Source identification with high-temporal resolution data from low-cost sensors using bivariate polar plots in urban areas of Ghana

C. Gameli Hodoli, F. Coulon and M.I. Mead

Environmental Pollution, 2023, 317, 120448
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120448

Nitrogen Dioxide Monitoring by Means of a Low-Cost Autonomous Platform and Sensor Calibration via Machine Learning with Global Data Correlation Enhancement

Slawomir Koziel, Anna Pietrenko-Dabrowska, Marek Wójcikowski and Bogdan Pankiewicz

Sensors, 2025, 25, 2352
DOI: 10.3390/s25082352

Next-Generation Chemical Sensors: The Convergence of Nanomaterials, Advanced Characterization, and Real-World Applications

Abniel Machín and Francisco Márquez

Chemosensors, 2025, 13, 345
DOI: 10.3390/chemosensors13090345

Use of networks of low cost air quality sensors to quantify air quality in urban settings

Olalekan A.M. Popoola, David Carruthers, Chetan Lad, Vivien B. Bright, Mohammed I. Mead, Marc E.J. Stettler, John R. Saffell and Roderic L. Jones

Atmospheric Environment, 2018, 194, 58
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.030

High-performance machine-learning-based calibration of low-cost nitrogen dioxide sensor using environmental parameter differentials and global data scaling

Slawomir Koziel, Anna Pietrenko-Dabrowska, Marek Wojcikowski and Bogdan Pankiewicz

Sci Rep, 2024, 14
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77214-y

Assessing a low-cost methane sensor quantification system for use in complex rural and urban environments

Ashley Collier-Oxandale, Joanna Gordon Casey, Ricardo Piedrahita, John Ortega, Hannah Halliday, Jill Johnston and Michael P. Hannigan

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2018, 11, 3569
DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-3569-2018

Smart Multi-Sensor Calibration of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Monitors

Edwin Villanueva, Soledad Espezua, George Castelar, Kyara Diaz and Erick Ingaroca

Sensors, 2023, 23, 3776
DOI: 10.3390/s23073776

Establishing A Sustainable Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Setup: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art

Mannam Veera Narayana, Devendra Jalihal and S. M. Shiva Nagendra

Sensors, 2022, 22, 394
DOI: 10.3390/s22010394