Johannes Karwounopoulos, Zhiyi Wu, Sara Tkaczyk, Shuzhe Wang, Adam Baskerville, Kavindri Ranasinghe, Thierry Langer, Geoffrey P. F. Wood, Marcus Wieder and Stefan Boresch

J. Phys. Chem. B, 2024, 128, 6693
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c01417

A Comparison of QM/MM Simulations with and without the Drude Oscillator Model Based on Hydration Free Energies of Simple Solutes

Gerhard König, Frank Pickard, Jing Huang, Walter Thiel, Alexander MacKerell, Bernard Brooks and Darrin York

Molecules, 2018, 23, 2695
DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102695

QM/MM free energy simulations: recent progress and challenges

Xiya Lu, Dong Fang, Shingo Ito, Yuko Okamoto, Victor Ovchinnikov and Qiang Cui

Molecular Simulation, 2016, 42, 1056
DOI: 10.1080/08927022.2015.1132317

Efficiently computing pathway free energies: New approaches based on chain-of-replica and Non-Boltzmann Bennett reweighting schemes

Phillip S. Hudson, Justin K. White, Fiona L. Kearns, Milan Hodoscek, Stefan Boresch and H. Lee Woodcock

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, 2015, 1850, 944
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.09.016

Application of quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics methods in the study of enzymatic reaction mechanisms

Sérgio Filipe Sousa, António J. M. Ribeiro, Rui P. P. Neves, Natércia F. Brás, Nuno M. F. S. A. Cerqueira, Pedro A. Fernandes and Maria João Ramos

WIREs Comput Mol Sci, 2017, 7
DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1281

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: “HiPen”, a New Dataset for Validating (S)QM/MM Free Energy Simulations

Fiona Kearns, Luke Warrensford, Stefan Boresch and H. Woodcock

Molecules, 2019, 24, 681
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24040681

Host–Guest Relative Binding Affinities at Density-Functional Theory Level from Semiempirical Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Meiting Wang, Ye Mei and Ulf Ryde

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2019, 15, 2659
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01280

Calculating distribution coefficients based on multi-scale free energy simulations: an evaluation of MM and QM/MM explicit solvent simulations of water-cyclohexane transfer in the SAMPL5 challenge

Gerhard König, Frank C. Pickard , Jing Huang, Andrew C. Simmonett, Florentina Tofoleanu, Juyong Lee, Pavlo O. Dral, Samarjeet Prasad, Michael Jones, Yihan Shao, Walter Thiel and Bernard R. Brooks

J Comput Aided Mol Des, 2016, 30, 989
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9936-x

CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed

Wonmuk Hwang, Steven L. Austin, Arnaud Blondel, Eric D. Boittier, Stefan Boresch, Matthias Buck, Joshua Buckner, Amedeo Caflisch, Hao-Ting Chang, Xi Cheng, Yeol Kyo Choi, Jhih-Wei Chu, Michael F. Crowley, Qiang Cui, Ana Damjanovic, Yuqing Deng, Mike Devereux, Xinqiang Ding, Michael F. Feig, Jiali Gao, David R. Glowacki, James E. Gonzales, Mehdi Bagerhi Hamaneh, Edward D. Harder, Ryan L. Hayes, Jing Huang, Yandong Huang, Phillip S. Hudson, Wonpil Im, Shahidul M. Islam, Wei Jiang, Michael R. Jones, Silvan Käser, Fiona L. Kearns, Nathan R. Kern, Jeffery B. Klauda, Themis Lazaridis, Jinhyuk Lee, Justin A. Lemkul, Xiaorong Liu, Yun Luo, Alexander D. MacKerell, Dan T. Major, Markus Meuwly, Kwangho Nam, Lennart Nilsson, Victor Ovchinnikov, Emanuele Paci, Soohyung Park, Richard W. Pastor, Amanda R. Pittman, Carol Beth Post, Samarjeet Prasad, Jingzhi Pu, Yifei Qi, Thenmalarchelvi Rathinavelan, Daniel R. Roe, Benoit Roux, Christopher N. Rowley, Jana Shen, Andrew C. Simmonett, Alexander J. Sodt, Kai Töpfer, Meenu Upadhyay, Arjan van der Vaart, Luis Itza Vazquez-Salazar, Richard M. Venable, Luke C. Warrensford, H. Lee Woodcock, Yujin Wu, Charles L. Brooks, Bernard R. Brooks and Martin Karplus

J. Phys. Chem. B, 2024, 128, 9976
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04100

On the convergence of multi-scale free energy simulations

Gerhard König, Bernard R. Brooks, Walter Thiel and Darrin M. York

Molecular Simulation, 2018, 44, 1062
DOI: 10.1080/08927022.2018.1475741

Are Explicit Solvent Models More Accurate than Implicit Solvent Models? A Case Study on the Menschutkin Reaction

Junbo Chen, Yihan Shao and Junming Ho

J. Phys. Chem. A, 2019, 123, 5580
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b03995

Recent advances in QM/MM free energy calculations using reference potentials

Fernanda Duarte, Beat A. Amrein, David Blaha-Nelson and Shina C.L. Kamerlin

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, 2015, 1850, 954
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.07.008

Multiple Environment Single System Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical (MESS-QM/MM) Calculations. 1. Estimation of Polarization Energies

Alexander J. Sodt, Ye Mei, Gerhard König, Peng Tao, Ryan P. Steele, Bernard R. Brooks and Yihan Shao

J. Phys. Chem. A, 2015, 119, 1511
DOI: 10.1021/jp5072296

Machine Learning Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Potentials: Evaluating Transferability in Dihydrofolate Reductase-Catalyzed Reactions

Abdul Raafik Arattu Thodika, Xiaoliang Pan, Yihan Shao and Kwangho Nam

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2025, 21, 817
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01487

Accurate and Efficient Multilevel Free Energy Simulations with Neural Network-Assisted Enhanced Sampling

Yuchen Yuan and Qiang Cui

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2023, 19, 5394
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00591

Efficient Free Energies from a Simplified Electrostatic Embedding QM/MM Approach Based on Electrostatic Potential Fitted Operators

Simone Bonfrate, Nicolas Ferré and Miquel Huix-Rotllant

J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2025, 65, 9196
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01563

Use of Nonequilibrium Work Methods to Compute Free Energy Differences Between Molecular Mechanical and Quantum Mechanical Representations of Molecular Systems

Phillip S. Hudson, H. Lee Woodcock and Stefan Boresch

J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2015, 6, 4850
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02164

Optimizing the Calculation of Free Energy Differences in Nonequilibrium Work SQM/MM Switching Simulations

Andreas Schöller, Fiona Kearns, H. Lee Woodcock and Stefan Boresch

J. Phys. Chem. B, 2022, 126, 2798
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c00696

Multiscale Free Energy Simulations: An Efficient Method for Connecting Classical MD Simulations to QM or QM/MM Free Energies Using Non-Boltzmann Bennett Reweighting Schemes

Gerhard König, Phillip S. Hudson, Stefan Boresch and H. Lee Woodcock

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2014, 10, 1406
DOI: 10.1021/ct401118k

Accelerated Computation of Free Energy Profile at Ab Initio Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanics Accuracy via a Semiempirical Reference Potential. 4. Adaptive QM/MM

Jia-Ning Wang, Wei Liu, Pengfei Li, Yan Mo, Wenxin Hu, Jun Zheng, Xiaoliang Pan, Yihan Shao and Ye Mei

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2021, 17, 1318
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01149

Exploring Routes to Enhance the Calculation of Free Energy Differences via Non-Equilibrium Work SQM/MM Switching Simulations Using Hybrid Charge Intermediates between MM and SQM Levels of Theory or Non-Linear Switching Schemes

Andreas Schöller, H. Lee Woodcock and Stefan Boresch

Molecules, 2023, 28, 4006
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28104006

Ensembles of Metastable States Govern Heterogeneous Catalysis on Dynamic Interfaces

Zisheng Zhang, Borna Zandkarimi and Anastassia N. Alexandrova

Acc. Chem. Res., 2020, 53, 447
DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00531

Correcting for the free energy costs of bond or angle constraints in molecular dynamics simulations

Gerhard König and Bernard R. Brooks

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, 2015, 1850, 932
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.09.001

Predicting hydration free energies with a hybrid QM/MM approach: an evaluation of implicit and explicit solvation models in SAMPL4

Gerhard König, Frank C. Pickard, Ye Mei and Bernard R. Brooks

J Comput Aided Mol Des, 2014, 28, 245
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9708-4

Accelerating QM/MM Free Energy Computations via Intramolecular Force Matching

Phillip S. Hudson, Stefan Boresch, David M. Rogers and H. Lee Woodcock

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2018, 14, 6327
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00517

Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale

Phillip S. Hudson, Kyungreem Han, H. Lee Woodcock and Bernard R. Brooks

J Comput Aided Mol Des, 2018, 32, 983
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0165-3

Binding affinities by alchemical perturbation using QM/MM with a large QM system and polarizable MM model

Samuel Genheden, Ulf Ryde and Pär Söderhjelm

J Comput Chem, 2015, 36, 2114
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.24048

Accelerated Computation of Free Energy Profile at Ab Initio Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanics Accuracy via a Semiempirical Reference Potential. 3. Gaussian Smoothing on Density-of-States

Wenxin Hu, Pengfei Li, Jia-Ning Wang, Yuanfei Xue, Yan Mo, Jun Zheng, Xiaoliang Pan, Yihan Shao and Ye Mei

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2020, 16, 6814
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00794

Calculations of Solvation Free Energy through Energy Reweighting from Molecular Mechanics to Quantum Mechanics

Xiangyu Jia, Meiting Wang, Yihan Shao, Gerhard König, Bernard R. Brooks, John Z. H. Zhang and Ye Mei

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2016, 12, 499
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00920

Evaluation of Machine Learning/Molecular Mechanics End-State Corrections with Mechanical Embedding to Calculate Relative Protein–Ligand Binding Free Energies

Johannes Karwounopoulos, Mateusz Bieniek, Zhiyi Wu, Adam L. Baskerville, Gerhard König, Benjamin P. Cossins and Geoffrey P. F. Wood

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2025, 21, 967
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01427

Biomolecular QM/MM Simulations: What Are Some of the “Burning Issues”?

Qiang Cui, Tanmoy Pal and Luke Xie

J. Phys. Chem. B, 2021, 125, 689
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c09898

Multi-level free energy simulation with a staged transformation approach

Shingo Ito and Qiang Cui

The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2020, 153
DOI: 10.1063/5.0012494

Accelerating Ab Initio Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical (QM/MM) Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Multiple Time Step Integration and a Recalibrated Semiempirical QM/MM Hamiltonian

Xiaoliang Pan, Richard Van, Evgeny Epifanovsky, Jian Liu, Jingzhi Pu, Kwangho Nam and Yihan Shao

J. Phys. Chem. B, 2022, 126, 4226
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c02262

Bridging semiempirical and ab initio QM/MM potentials by Gaussian process regression and its sparse variants for free energy simulation

Ryan Snyder, Bryant Kim, Xiaoliang Pan, Yihan Shao and Jingzhi Pu

The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2023, 159
DOI: 10.1063/5.0156327

Loss of Catalytic Activity in the E134D, H67A, and H349A Mutants of DapE: Mechanistic Analysis with QM/MM Investigation

Debodyuti Dutta and Sabyashachi Mishra

J. Phys. Chem. B, 2016, 120, 11654
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b07446

Affordable Ab Initio Path Integral for Thermodynamic Properties via Molecular Dynamics Simulations Using Semiempirical Reference Potential

Yuanfei Xue, Jia-Ning Wang, Wenxin Hu, Jun Zheng, Yongle Li, Xiaoliang Pan, Yan Mo, Yihan Shao, Lu Wang and Ye Mei

J. Phys. Chem. A, 2021, 125, 10677
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c07727

Toward Simple, Predictive Understanding of Protein-Ligand Interactions: Electronic Structure Calculations on Torpedo Californica Acetylcholinesterase Join Forces with the Chemist’s Intuition

Nitai Sylvetsky

Sci Rep, 2020, 10
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65984-0

Free-energy perturbation and quantum mechanical study of SAMPL4 octa-acid host–guest binding energies

Paulius Mikulskis, Daniela Cioloboc, Milica Andrejić, Sakshi Khare, Joakim Brorsson, Samuel Genheden, Ricardo A. Mata, Pär Söderhjelm and Ulf Ryde

J Comput Aided Mol Des, 2014, 28, 375
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9739-x

Accelerated Computation of Free Energy Profile at ab Initio Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanics Accuracy via a Semi-Empirical Reference Potential. I. Weighted Thermodynamics Perturbation

Pengfei Li, Xiangyu Jia, Xiaoliang Pan, Yihan Shao and Ye Mei

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2018, 14, 5583
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00571

Computing the Free Energy Barriers for Less by Sampling with a Coarse Reference Potential while Retaining Accuracy of the Target Fine Model

Nikolay V. Plotnikov

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2014, 10, 2987
DOI: 10.1021/ct500109m

Automated Training of ReaxFF Reactive Force Fields for Energetics of Enzymatic Reactions

Tomáš Trnka, Igor Tvaroška and Jaroslav Koča

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2018, 14, 291
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00870

Ligand-Binding Affinity Estimates Supported by Quantum-Mechanical Methods

Ulf Ryde and Pär Söderhjelm

Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 5520
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00630

Effects of a More Accurate Polarizable Hamiltonian on Polymorph Free Energies Computed Efficiently by Reweighting Point-Charge Potentials

Eric C. Dybeck, Natalie P. Schieber and Michael R. Shirts

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2016, 12, 3491
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00397

Efficient Strategy for the Calculation of Solvation Free Energies in Water and Chloroform at the Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Level

Meiting Wang, Pengfei Li, Xiangyu Jia, Wei Liu, Yihan Shao, Wenxin Hu, Jun Zheng, Bernard R. Brooks and Ye Mei

J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2017, 57, 2476
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00001

Learning QM/MM potential using equivariant multiscale model

Yao-Kun Lei, Kiyoshi Yagi and Yuji Sugita

The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2024, 160
DOI: 10.1063/5.0205123

Matching the Probability Distribution On-the-Fly: OPES-Based Dual-Level Free Energy Calculation

Shuming Cheng, Shengheng Yan and Binju Wang

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2025, 21, 8341
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01128

Blind prediction of distribution in the SAMPL5 challenge with QM based protomer and pK a corrections

Frank C. Pickard, Gerhard König, Florentina Tofoleanu, Juyong Lee, Andrew C. Simmonett, Yihan Shao, Jay W. Ponder and Bernard R. Brooks

J Comput Aided Mol Des, 2016, 30, 1087
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9955-7

Absolute proton hydration free energy, surface potential of water, and redox potential of the hydrogen electrode from first principles: QM/MM MD free-energy simulations of sodium and potassium hydration

Thomas S. Hofer and Philippe H. Hünenberger

The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2018, 148
DOI: 10.1063/1.5000799

Machine-Learning-Assisted Free Energy Simulation of Solution-Phase and Enzyme Reactions

Xiaoliang Pan, Junjie Yang, Richard Van, Evgeny Epifanovsky, Junming Ho, Jing Huang, Jingzhi Pu, Ye Mei, Kwangho Nam and Yihan Shao

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2021, 17, 5745
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00565

Self-Parametrizing System-Focused Atomistic Models

Christoph Brunken and Markus Reiher

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2020, 16, 1646
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00855

Converging ligand‐binding free energies obtained with free‐energy perturbations at the quantum mechanical level

Martin A. Olsson, Pär Söderhjelm and Ulf Ryde

J. Comput. Chem., 2016, 37, 1589
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.24375

Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery

Tai-Sung Lee, Bryce K. Allen, Timothy J. Giese, Zhenyu Guo, Pengfei Li, Charles Lin, T. Dwight McGee, David A. Pearlman, Brian K. Radak, Yujun Tao, Hsu-Chun Tsai, Huafeng Xu, Woody Sherman and Darrin M. York

J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2020, 60, 5595
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00613

On the faithfulness of molecular mechanics representations of proteins towards quantum-mechanical energy surfaces

Gerhard König and Sereina Riniker

Interface Focus, 2020, 10
DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0121

Convergence of single-step free energy perturbation

Stefan Boresch and H. Lee Woodcock

Molecular Physics, 2017, 115, 1200
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2016.1269960

The ONIOM Method and Its Applications

Lung Wa Chung, W. M. C. Sameera, Romain Ramozzi, Alister J. Page, Miho Hatanaka, Galina P. Petrova, Travis V. Harris, Xin Li, Zhuofeng Ke, Fengyi Liu, Hai-Bei Li, Lina Ding and Keiji Morokuma

Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 5678
DOI: 10.1021/cr5004419

Development of a Robust Indirect Approach for MM → QM Free Energy Calculations That Combines Force-Matched Reference Potential and Bennett’s Acceptance Ratio Methods

Timothy J. Giese and Darrin M. York

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2019, 15, 5543
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00401

An efficient protocol for obtaining accurate hydration free energies using quantum chemistry and reweighting from molecular dynamics simulations

Frank C. Pickard, Gerhard König, Andrew C. Simmonett, Yihan Shao and Bernard R. Brooks

Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 2016, 24, 4988
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.08.031

Use of Interaction Energies in QM/MM Free Energy Simulations

Phillip S. Hudson, H. Lee Woodcock and Stefan Boresch

J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2019, 15, 4632
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00084

Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics dual Hamiltonian free energy perturbation

Iakov Polyak, Tobias Benighaus, Eliot Boulanger and Walter Thiel

The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2013, 139
DOI: 10.1063/1.4817402

Enhancing Paradynamics for QM/MM Sampling of Enzymatic Reactions

Jerônimo Lameira, Ilya Kupchencko and Arieh Warshel

J. Phys. Chem. B, 2016, 120, 2155
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b11966

Computing converged free energy differences between levels of theory via nonequilibrium work methods: Challenges and opportunities

Fiona L. Kearns, Phillip S. Hudson, Henry L. Woodcock and Stefan Boresch

J Comput Chem, 2017, 38, 1376
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.24706