Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

An aqueous rechargeable and high-capacity zinc ion battery using a novel rGO–V2O5–SiO2 hybrid nanocomposite as a cathode material

Akash Lata a, Anuj Kumar a, Gautam Biswas b, Nripen Chanda c and Ravi Kumar Arun *a
aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jammu, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 181221, India. E-mail: ravi.arun@iitjammu.ac.in
bDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
cMaterials Processing and Microsystems Laboratory, CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Mahatma Gandhi Road, City Center, Durgapur 713209, West Bengal, India

Received 12th April 2023 , Accepted 22nd May 2023

First published on 31st May 2023


Abstract

We report an aqueous Zn–rGO–V2O5–SiO2 pouch-type rechargeable zinc ion battery (ZIB) with a rGO–V2O5–SiO2 hybrid nanocomposite as the cathode, Zn as the anode, and 0.5 M Zn (CF3SO3)2 as the electrolyte. The rGO–V2O5–SiO2 hybrid cathode, in the presence of an aqueous electrolyte, intercalated Zn2+ ions in its 3D layers due to the high surface area and porosity of the developed nanorod structures. Furthermore, the combined electrical conductivity of rGO and V2O5 with high water adsorption capacity of silica synergistically affects the charge–discharge rate and stability of the ZIB. As a result, the aqueous rechargeable battery depicts a specific charge capacity of 640 mA h g−1 at 200 mA g−1 and a high-performance rate of 890 mA h g−1 at 20 mA g−1 which are further stacked in series to obtain a capacity of 502 mA h g−1 at 12 V. The pouch cell configuration makes this battery a potential candidate for large-scale energy storage applications.


1. Introduction

In today's era, while energy demand is continuously increasing, the quest for alternative energy sources is on the rise.1–3 The electrochemical energy storage devices, such as batteries and fuel cells, that can integrate with the renewable energy systems can fill this deficit and provide a clean energy solution.4,5 Currently, the largest market share of portable electronics belongs to lithium-ion batteries, and they are widely applicable due to their long-life cycles, high energy densities and wider working voltage range.6,7 However, their prolonged usage is hindered by the limited resources of Li, its high cost, and the combustible organic electrolytes.8 Comparatively, aqueous rechargeable batteries are a promising candidate with naturally abundant Na+, K+, and Zn2+ ions.9 Among them, exceptional properties have been shown by the aqueous rechargeable Zinc ion batteries (ZIBs) with a high volumetric capacity and low redox potential of Zn/Zn2+ (−0.762 V vs. SHE).10 The ZIBs have drawn extensive attention due to their low maintenance, high safety, cost effectiveness and less environmental impact.11 However, there is still an issue with the active electrostatic synergy between Zn2+and the positive cathode material due to the high hydrated ionic radius of Zn2+ (4.04–4.30 [Å]) that creates a slowdown in exchange for Zn2+ intercalation into the host cathode material.12 Several efforts have been invested in developing host materials for ZIB cathodes, such as organic compounds, molybdenum-based sulfides, Prussian blue analogues (PBAs), manganese oxide, and vanadium-based oxides.13–21 In the midst of these, vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) is a broadly suitable cathode material because of the high storage capacity of Zn2+ ions in the layered structures (∼589 mA h g−1).4 However, surprisingly, crystalline V2O5 suffers from sluggish dispersion of divalent Zn2+ to augment the effective interaction along with the matrix due to unwanted structural strength in the cyclic Zn2+ insertion/extraction mechanism.22 There are several ways to resolve these complications, such as pre-intercalation of V2O5 crystals by external molecules (e.g., polymers and H2O) and metal ions (e.g., Li+, Ca2+, and Zn2+), and creating additional O2 vacancies in the V2O5 lattice. In this context, an amorphous V2O5 xerogel (V2O5·nH2O) has been used to overcome the sluggish reaction kinetics of Zn2+ to make this energy storage system fast and reversible.23

Amorphous V2O5 with a disordered structure provides a significant enhancement in the intercalation of Zn2+ ions with the increment of active sites and short-range diffusive paths, making it facile enough at the time of cycling of ions in comparison to crystalline V2O5.24 Though amorphous V2O5 shows enhanced Zn2+ intercalation, low electrical conductivity remains an open challenge for both crystalline V2O5 and amorphous V2O5.25 Previously, the electrodes in ZIBs have used conductive additives such as graphene, carbon black, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), etc. to improve their performance.26 Out of these, flexible 2D graphene is distinctly favorable in the creation of connected conductive networks,27 offering effective charge transmission over the V2O5-based electrodes.28 Moreover, V2O5 nanosheets and graphene can be coupled together, creating a vigorous 2D heterostructure that includes numerous interfacial cooperation among the two systems, and hence approaching an evident improvement in the electrical conductivity, adsorption of the metal ions, and consequent enhancement of the electrochemical performance.29

In addition, earlier works utilized a multistep process to synthesize V2O5-graphene composite electrodes, which included hydrothermal reactions, long-run sol–gel reactions, sluggish freeze-drying, and thermal post-treatments (to retain conductivity of GO).30,31 The excessive annealing (≥400 °C), however, may cause the loss of water of crystallization in V2O5 and deteriorate the electrochemical performance in ZIBs.24,30 Thus, the fabrication of electrode materials requires significantly lower temperatures (150 to ≈200 °C) and involves GO, which is directly synthesized from the modified hummers method.24 Regarding the structural properties of the electrode materials, the 3D structure of the anode materials has been attributed to the uniform nucleation of Zn and suppressed the dendrite growth on the anode side in a ZIB.32 3D SiO2 affects the specific capacity values of the battery due to enhanced ionic diffusion owing to its excellent stability, high surface area, porous nature, and water adsorption ability.32 The recent advancements of 3D Zn ion batteries, which have potential applications in wearable electronics, show a capacity retention of more than 84% after 1000 cycles with a capacity of 148.3 mA h g−1.33 However, unlike anode materials, no such cathode materials have the appropriate lattice structure to accommodate Zn2+ at high current density. Therefore, developing newer cathode material is essential to provide reversible and prompt Zn2+ ion intercalation/de-intercalation for better ZIB performance.

Herein, we report an aqueous rechargeable battery using a zinc anode and rGO–V2O5–SiO2 hybrid composite as the cathode material to enhance the overall electrochemical performance. The rGO–V2O5–SiO2 has a nanospheric 3D layer structure composed of cylindrical nanorod particles synthesized by the hydrothermal technique. The hybrid nature facilitates the insertion/extraction of Zn2+ during the cycling process due to the high surface area and porosity of the cathode material, thus increasing the energy storage capacity of the battery. The combined electrical conductivity of rGO and V2O5 with the high water adsorption capacity of silica can synergistically affect the performance rate capability and stability of the ZIB.34,35 When used as the cathode material in aqueous rechargeable ZIBs, the rGO–V2O5–SiO2 composite demonstrates a specific capacity of 640 mA h g−1 at 0.200 mA g−1 and high-performance rate of 890 mA h g−1 at 20 mA g−1. The series combination of ZIB-based pouch cells for a 12 V stack shows the stable charge–discharge performance at 200 mA g−1 after 80 cycles, measured at the capacity of 502 mA h g−1. The pouch cell configuration with an active material loading of ∼ 7.3 mg cm−2 is an attempt towards large scale energy application of ZIBs.

2. Results and discussion

V2O5 shows an orthorhombic crystal structure with short interlayer spacing.36 To enhance the spacing between the layers, reduced graphene oxide (rGO) has been introduced between the V2O5 layers. Initially, SiO2 with water absorption capacity is added to the V2O5. Afterward, the graphene oxide is mixed with the V2O5 and SiO2, followed by a hydrothermal process which leads to redox reactions in acidic conditions. The rGO layers intercalate around the inner layers of the V2O5 crystal structure. This is followed by covering with the SiO2 layer like an envelope around the V2O5 layers, creating cylindrical nanorods. This way, a noticeable expansion is obtained in the interlayer spacing of V2O5. Concurrently, the insertion of the rGO causes the limited reduction of V5+ to V4+.37 The mixed V2O5–SiO2 and the conducting surface of rGO collectively improve the ion/electron transport kinetics of V2O5 leading to an efficient ion transport capacity.37 Herein, a pouch cell configuration of Zn/rGO–V2O5–SiO2 is developed via hydrothermal growth and by following the subsequent steps. We used carbon-coated aluminum foil as current collector, Zn foil as anode and rGO–V2O5–SiO2 hybrid nanocomposite as the cathode. A packaging bag of aluminum was used with the addition of electrolyte to pack the cell. An operational exchange of ions in the cages of the cathode material is shown in Fig. 1, which depicts the intercalation-deintercalation process in the pouch cell.
image file: d3ya00158j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Charge–discharge process with the structural alignment of the pouch cell describing the transportation of Zn2+ ions in the presence of electrolyte with the cathode material.

The primary interactions in the cell are between the zinc ions in the electrolyte and the cathode materials. During the discharge process, the anodic Zn is oxidized to Zn2+ ions, which intercalate into the layered structure of rGO–V2O5–SiO2. The intercalation of Zn ions into the cathode material leads to the generation of electrons, which flow through the external circuit and power the device. During the charge process, the Zn2+ ions reduce back to the Zn anode, and the intercalated Zn2+ ions diffuse back to the electrolyte to keep the concentration of zinc ions constant in the electrolyte. The rGO serves as a conductive surface that improves the electrical conductivity of the cathode material. This enables faster electron transfer during the redox reactions, leading to improved battery performance.38Fig. 2 displays the surface morphology of the nanocomposite rGO–V2O5–SiO2. As seen in Fig. 2a, the SiO2 has a loose cotton-like structure, while the V2O5 sample exhibits square-shaped rods that are distributed irregularly. In other words, V2O5 nanorods can be seen scattered throughout the cotton-like SiO2 framework and their distinct phases over a large area can be seen in Fig. 2b. TEM images provide crucial information about particle size, shape, and distribution. TEM imaging of Fig. 2c reveals that square plated nanorods of V2O5, along with the rGO–V2O5–SiO2 framework, are present on the surface of the rGO nanosheets. However, the elongated direction of V2O5 flakes attached to the rGO nanosheets, as shown in Fig. 2d, creates a high wall surface in the 3-D architecture. This rough surface in the rGO–V2O5–SiO2 composite facilitates rapid ion intercalation, leading to superior performance of the Pouch cell compared to using V2O5 alone. SEM images of a single sheet of rGO in Fig. S1 (ESI) suggest its presence in the composite, and Fig. S2a and b (ESI) shows a large area of V2O5 containing the nanospheres and SiO2 all over the surface of the nanorods. EDS was employed to identify the composition of the rGO–V2O5–SiO2 hybrid nanocomposite. The imaging spectra in Fig. S3 (ESI) clearly show the dispersion of elements throughout the structure and confirm the presence of Si, V, C and O in the nanocomposite. According to quantitative elemental analysis in Fig. S2c (ESI), the atomic ratio of Si/V is near the beginning proportion of the precursors.


image file: d3ya00158j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) FESEM image of rGO–V2O5–SiO2; (b) TEM image of rGO–V2O5–SiO2; (c) TEM image of the composite showing square plated nanorods of V2O5, along with the V2O5–SiO2 framework; (d) the composite of rGO–V2O5–SiO2.

XRD was used to describe the crystal structures of the rGO–V2O5–SiO2 hybrid nanocomposite. Fig. 3a shows a broad peak in the SiO2 XRD pattern, suggesting that the obtained SiO2 is amorphous. No impurity peaks are visible in the V2O5 samples, and all peaks are compatible with orthorhombic V2O5 (JCPDS no. 41-1426). The two phases of V2O5 and SiO2 are preserved after hydrothermal treatment, according to the XRD patterns of the V2O5–SiO2 hybrid samples. After the addition of GO in the composite, according to the degree of reduction, the peak position of the GO sheets shifts into higher scattering angles when GO is reduced by thermal treatment and converting to rGO. The narrow and sharp diffraction peaks in the patterns indicate that the samples have a high degree of crystallinity. It is important to mention that the XRD peaks of the rGO–V2O5–SiO2 hybrid nanocomposite are slightly shifted in comparison to V2O5, indicating that the partially reduced graphene nanosheets are evenly dispersed in the composites. This dispersion is facilitated by the presence of V2O5 nanoparticles resulting in increased interlayer spacing that may affect the crystal structure of the composite.39


image file: d3ya00158j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) XRD spectra of rGO–V2O5–SiO2, V2O5–SiO2, and only SiO2 materials; (b) Raman spectra of the composite (rGO–V2O5–SiO2) under the irradiation of a 532 nm laser.

Raman spectra have also been investigated to analyze the vibrational modes of the nanocomposite. There has been found a series of feature peaks at 98.03, 172.89, 272.52, 431.52, 509.16, 696.85, 1013, 1353, and 1595.63 cm−1 corresponding to vibration spectra of V2O5, SiO2 and rGO. Under normal conditions, the lower wavenumber presented here as 98.03 and 172.89 cm−1 corresponds to the chain translational modes present in the layered structures, which shows a good agreement with the device intercalation mechanism. The significance of bending vibrations depicted by the peak at 272.52 and 431.52 cm−1 corresponds to V[double bond, length as m-dash]O and V–O–V bonds, respectively. The Raman shift at 509.16 cm−1 can be connected to the stretching vibration of the V3–O bond by the oxygen with three coordinated V ions. Moreover, the Raman bands recorded at 1013 and 509.16 cm−1 correspond to the edge stretching vibration of the V1[double bond, length as m-dash][thin space (1/6-em)]O and V2–O bonds, respectively. Besides, the Raman shifts exhibited the intensities of the D and G peaks at 1364.2 and 1591.5 cm−1, respectively in Fig. 3b.

The V2O5–SiO2 and SiO2 samples have been characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy (Fig. S4, ESI), showing strong silica matrix bands. Both the materials display absorption peaks at 819, 1099, 1632, and 3473 cm−1, corresponding to the vibration of doubly coordinated oxygen bonds (bridge oxygen), the stretching vibration of terminal oxygen bonds (V[double bond, length as m-dash]O), the H–O–H bending, and the O–H stretching vibration modes of H2O molecules, respectively. The bands at 798 cm−1 and 802 cm−1 are attributed to Si–O–Si symmetric stretching, while the broad bands in the 1000–1200 cm−1 range are attributed to asymmetric Si–O–Si stretching. Moreover, the broad bands observed at about 3400 cm−1 are attributed to O–H stretching vibration. SiO2 framework vibrations dominate the FT-IR spectra of the V2O5–SiO2 composite. However, the V[double bond, length as m-dash]O stretching band at about 1010 cm−1 in the spectra might be attributed to asymmetric V–O–V stretching. The Raman spectrum has also been investigated to analyze the vibrational modes of the nanocomposite.

The electrochemical performance of the single pouch cell and its series combination is tested using a battery analyzer. As detailed in the experimental and supplementary information sections, the cathode material is prepared using the combination of rGO, SiO2, and V2O5. The single pouch cell is fabricated in ambient conditions with the cathode material, i.e., the rGO–V2O5–SiO2 nanocomposite, zinc foil as an anode, and Zn (CF3SO3)2 as the aqueous electrolyte. Fig. 4a shows the CV of rGO–V2O5–SiO2 at a scan rate of 1.0 mV s−1. During the anodic scan run, two peaks are observed, one at 0.71 V and the other at 0.83 V, which shows the oxidation peaks, and the vice versa reduction peak are also observed at 0.54, which are caused by the zinc ion intercalation/deintercalation during the discharge/charge processes. This suggests that the zinc ions are involved in the electrochemical processes of the Zn/rGO–V2O5–SiO2 electrodes with the hybrid Zn (CF3SO3)2 electrolyte. An improvement has been recorded in the electrochemical performance as observed in the CV graphs, which may be the effect of the cotton-like structure of SiO2 around V2O5 on the rGO planes, showing a good agreement with the SEM results. Fig. 4b displays reaction kinetics obtained through CV curves, demonstrating that the shapes of the curves remain well-maintained even with increasing scan rates. This indicates that the charge storage mechanisms in the Zn–rGO–V2O5–SiO2 nanocomposite battery are robust and unaffected by changes in the scan rate. The well-maintained shapes of the CV curves imply that the charge storage processes within the nanocomposite are reversible and occur at a relatively fast rate. In addition to this, current versus scan rates and square root of scan rates as shown in Fig. 4c and d exhibit linear behaviour with increased scan rate.40 The absence of significant changes in the curves with increasing scan rates suggests that the charge transfer kinetics are not limited by the surface adsorption rate, diffusion processes, or other factors that could cause deviations in the CV curves.41 The consistent shape of the CV curves over a range of scan rates is often indicative of a highly conductive and stable electrode material. This suggests that the Zn–rGO–V2O5–SiO2 nanocomposite possesses favourable properties for energy storage applications, such as efficient charge transfer and minimal degradation over multiple charge–discharge cycles.42,43 The typical galvanostatic discharge/charge curves of the rGO–V2O5–SiO2 hybrid nanocomposite in an aqueous electrolyte (0.5 M Zn (CF3SO3)2) at a current density of 200 mA g−1 are shown in Fig. 5c. The initial discharge and charge capacity values of the rGO–V2O5–SiO2 nanocomposite based on the weight of total cathode material was found to be 500 and 640 mA h g−1, respectively. The V2O5 squared nanorods, covered with SiO2, are dispersed on rGO as shown in the SEM and TEM, indicating that the surface of the V2O5 nanorods in contact with the electrolyte is increased, which might contribute to the exhibited higher capacity. Additionally, the mesoporous SiO2 might facilitate mass transport during the charge/discharge process, increasing the capacity. Fig. 5a and b display the cycling performances of the hybrid nanocomposite rGO–V2O5–SiO2 in an aqueous electrolyte. It was found in Fig. 5a that the capacities of rGO–V2O5–SiO2 maintain the initial capacity of 890 mA h g−1 up to 120 cycles of charge/discharge in the aqueous electrolyte at a current density of 20 mA g−1. The corresponding coulombic efficiencies around ∼100 at 20 mA g−1 have been shown in Fig. 5d, which is in good agreement with the cyclic retention data of the cell. Similar behavior has been shown in Fig. 5b at a higher current density of 200 mA g−1.


image file: d3ya00158j-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (a) rGO–V2O5–SiO2 cyclic voltammetry spectrum. We investigate the redox process of the rGO–V2O5–SiO2 cathode to explain the high-rate performance. This picture depicts the cathode's cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves at a scan rate of 1.0 mV s−1. The figure demonstrates two pairs of redox peaks in the CV curves that are compatible with the steady discharge charge profiles. (b) CV curves of rGO–V2O5–SiO2 at different scan rates from 1.0 to 5.0 mV s−1. Electrochemical fitting and theoretical calculation of the long-term chemical kinetics. (c and d) Fitting of the multi-sweep rate CV curves ranging from 1 to 5 mV s−1.

image file: d3ya00158j-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Galvanostatic charge–discharge profiles at varying current densities. (a) Cycle performance at different current densities at 20 mA g−1 and (b) 200 mA g−1; (c) voltage supply at different specific capacities; (d) coulombic efficiency of a single cell.

This consistency in the capacity values can be attributed to the significant reduction in the phase change of the active materials. The reaction occurs between the active material in the presence of adsorbed water of SiO2 and without the disintegration of the electrolyte or the dissolution of transition metal ions. The following reactions show the cathodic and anodic process on the electrodes.

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) was employed to gain additional insights into the system. The Nyquist plot, along with its corresponding Bode plot, revealed a linear trend in the high-frequency region for the charged device at 1.4 V. This linear trend suggests the association and dissociation of Zn metal ions within the system in Fig. S6 (ESI). Additionally, a closer examination of the Nyquist plots using the –equivalent circuit” model indicated significant variability in the interfacial charge transfer resistance within the electrolyte. Table S1 (ESI) shows the fitting factor with R1, R2, P2, and n1, which are the resultants of the fitting of the equivalent circuit.40,44 The study indicates that the synergistic effect of the water adsorption capacity of SiO2 and the structural capabilities of V2O5 play a significant role in high-capacity ZIBs. Also, the aqueous 0.5 M Zn (CF3SO3)2 electrolyte supports better cycling stability by decreasing the water molecules surrounding Zn2+ ions, thus improving charge transfer.45–47 In Fig. 6, the series combination of the individual cell produces 12 V energy. A total of 9 cells are connected in this configuration, as shown in Fig. S5 (ESI). The corresponding charging–discharging performance of the cell stack is shown in Fig. 6a. The cycling performance of the 12 V battery configuration at the current density of 200 mA g−1 demonstrates a high specific capacity of >500 mA h g−1, as shown in Fig. 6b. This pouch cell configuration is an attempt to realize the potential of the zinc ion battery for commercial applications. The parameters of the Zn ion battery are summarized and compared with other reported literature. Table S2 and Note 1 (ESI) show a comparison of the coin cell and pouch cell capacities. Of note, the stability of the electrode is preserved even after a long cycling duration. It can be clearly seen in Fig. S7a and b (ESI) that the Zn sheet is maintained with integrity of its structure. However, some of the parts look etched at the nanoscale, which could be attributed to the initial dissolution of zinc to achieve equilibrium with the Zn (CF3SO3)2 electrolyte. On another hand, Fig. S7c and d (ESI) clearly show the well preserved composite morphology after a long duration of 120 cycles. SiO2 with a spherical cotton-like structure with V2O5 nanoplates and the presence of rGO sheets can be visualized from the FESEM micrographs. The EDS spectra for a square shaped area in Fig. S7e and f (ESI) also depict the minimum dissolution of the zinc after 120 cycles, which was also reported earlier to demonstrate the chemical kinetics of the cell.48


image file: d3ya00158j-f6.tif
Fig. 6 (a) 12 V battery power supply at different specific capacities; (b) cycling performance of the 12 V battery at a constant current density of 200 mA g−1.

3. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed a rGO–V2O5–SiO2 nanocomposite-based cathode material in an aqueous electrolyte-driven ZIB using a hydrothermal technique. The synthesized material was analyzed using XRD graphs and FESEM demonstrating the existence of a porous structure in the cathode material, thus providing an enhanced interlayer spacing for Zn2+ intercalation. The resultant Zn–rGO–V2O5–SiO2 cathode can deliver a high capacity of 890 mA h g−1 at 20 mA g−1 along with excellent rate performance and cycling stability (∼97% capacity retention for at least 120 cycles). Extensive characterization of the cathode material at different charge/discharge states revealed that the cathode is highly reversible and stable.

Author contributions

All the authors took part in the discussion to understand the results and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank IIT Jammu and CSIR-CMERI for their valuable support. AL is thankful to MoE, GOI for the fellowship assistance. The authors are also grateful to DST-SERB, India for financial support under the Empowerment and Equity Opportunities for Excellence in Science (EMEQ) Scheme through research grant number (EEQ/2017/000220).

References

  1. L. Zhou, Y. Wang, H. Jia, H. Gong, L. Liu and T. Du, Sustainable Energy Fuels, 2022, 6, 1727–1732 RSC.
  2. R. Raccichini, A. Varzi, S. Passerini and B. Scrosati, Nat. Publ. Gr., 2014, 14, 271–279 Search PubMed.
  3. G. Xiong, P. He, B. Huang, T. Chen, Z. Bo and S. Fisher, Nano Energy, 2017, 38, 127–136 CrossRef CAS.
  4. Y. Huang, J. Mou, W. Liu, X. Wang and L. Dong, Nano-Micro Lett., 2019, 11, 1–13 CrossRef CAS.
  5. G. Fang, J. Zhou, A. Pan and S. Liang, ACS Energy Lett., 2018, 3, 2480–2501 CrossRef CAS.
  6. P. He, Z. Ding, X. Zhao, J. Liu, S. Yang, P. Gao and L. Fan, Inorg. Chem., 2019, 58, 12724–12732 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. K. Liu, Y. Liu, D. Lin, A. Pei and Y. Cui, Sci. Adv. Mater. Sci., 2018, 4, 1–11 Search PubMed.
  8. J. M. Tarascon and M. Armand, Nature, 2001, 414, 359–367 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. F. Wan, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, D. Liu, C. Wang, L. Song and Z. Niu, Angew. Chem., 2019, 230026, 7062–7067 CrossRef PubMed.
  10. Z. Batteries, M. T. Nguyen, T. Yonezawa, J. Ma and S. Kheawhom, Energies, 2020, 13, 1–13 Search PubMed.
  11. B. Tang, L. Shan, S. Liang and J. Zhou, Energy Environ. Sci., 2019, 12, 3288–3304 RSC.
  12. M. Song, H. Tan, D. Chao and H. J. Fan, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1–27 Search PubMed.
  13. H. Pan, Y. Shao, P. Yan, Y. Cheng, K. S. Han, Z. Nie, C. Wang, J. Yang, X. Li, P. Bhattacharya, K. T. Mueller and J. Liu, Nat. Energy, 2016, 1, 1–7 Search PubMed.
  14. G. Kasiri, R. Trócoli, A. Bani Hashemi and F. La Mantia, Electrochim. Acta, 2016, 222, 74–83 CrossRef CAS.
  15. T. Gupta, A. Kim, S. Phadke, S. Biswas, T. Luong, B. J. Hertzberg, M. Chamoun, K. Evans-Lutterodt and D. A. Steingart, J. Power Sources, 2016, 305, 22–29 CrossRef CAS.
  16. H. Liang, Z. Cao, F. Ming, W. Zhang, D. H. Anjum and Y. Cui, Nano Lett., 2019, 19, 3199–3206 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. Y. Cheng, L. Luo, L. Zhong, J. Chen, B. Li, W. Wang, S. X. Mao, C. Wang, V. L. Sprenkle, G. Li and J. Liu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 13673–13677 CrossRef CAS.
  18. N. Zhang, Y. Dong, M. Jia, X. Bian, Y. Wang, M. Qiu, J. Xu, Y. Liu, L. Jiao and F. Cheng, ACS Energy Lett., 2018, 3, 1366–1372 CrossRef CAS.
  19. B. Sambandam, V. Soundharrajan, S. Kim, M. H. Alfaruqi, J. Jo, S. Kim and V. Mathew, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 15530–15539 RSC.
  20. D. Kundu, P. Oberholzer, C. Glaros, A. Bouzid, E. Tervoort, A. Pasquarello and M. Niederberger, Chem. Mater., 2018, 30, 3874–3881 CrossRef CAS.
  21. G. Dawut, Y. Lu, L. Miao and J. Chen, Inorg. Chem. Front., 2018, 5, 1391–1396 RSC.
  22. G. Fang, S. Liang, Z. Chen, P. Cui, X. Zheng, A. Pan, B. Lu, X. Lu and J. Zhou, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2019, 29, 1–9 Search PubMed.
  23. M. Liao, J. Wang, L. Ye, H. Sun, Y. Wen, C. Wang, X. Sun, B. Wang and H. Peng, Angew. Chem., 2020, 132, 2293–2298 CrossRef.
  24. Y. Zhang, J. Qin, M. Batmunkh, W. Li, H. Fu, L. Wang, M. Al-Mamun, D. Qi, P. Liu, S. Zhang and Y. L. Zhong, Small, 2022, 2105761, 2105761 CrossRef PubMed.
  25. F. Coustier, S. Passerini, J. Hill and W. H. Smyrl, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1999, 146, 1355–1360 CrossRef CAS.
  26. S. Zhang, H. Tan, X. Rui and Y. Yu, Acc. Chem. Res., 2020, 53, 1660–1671 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. R. Chen, T. Zhao, J. Lu, F. Wu, L. Li, J. Chen and G. Tan, Nanoletters, 2013, 13, 4642–4649 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. Q. Pang, C. Sun, Y. Yu, K. Zhao, Z. Zhang, P. M. Voyles, G. Chen, Y. Wei and X. Wang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8, 1–9 Search PubMed.
  29. R. Sahoo, T. H. Lee, D. T. Pham, T. H. T. Luu and Y. H. Lee, ACS Nano, 2019, 13, 10776–10786 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. H. Huang, X. Wang, E. Tervoort, G. Zeng, T. Liu, X. Chen, A. Sologubenko and M. Niederberger, ACS Nano, 2018, 12, 2753–2763 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. K. Palanisamy, J. H. Um, M. Jeong and W. S. Yoon, Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 1–12 CrossRef PubMed.
  32. P. Xue, C. Guo, N. Wang, K. Zhu, S. Jing, S. Kong, X. Zhang, L. Li, H. Li, Y. Feng, W. Gong and Q. Li, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 1–10 Search PubMed.
  33. J. Huang, Y. Li, R. Xie, J. Li, Z. Tian, G. Chai, Y. Zhang, F. Lai, G. He, C. Liu, T. Liu and D. J. L. Brett, J. Energy Chem., 2021, 58, 147–155 CrossRef CAS.
  34. Z. Zhang, H. Wang, S. Ji, B. G. Pollet and R. Wang, Ionics, 2016, 22, 1593–1601 CrossRef CAS.
  35. S. Wang, K. Zhu, L. Yang, H. Li, S. Wang, S. Tang and M. Zhang, Ionics, 2020, 26, 5607–5615 CrossRef CAS.
  36. G. Du, H. Seng, Z. Guo, J. Liu, W. Li, D. Jia and C. Cook, RSC Adv., 2011, 690–697 RSC.
  37. S. Gupta, B. Aberg, S. B. Carrizosa and N. Dimakis, Materials, 2016, 9(8), 615 CrossRef PubMed.
  38. W. Gou, H. Chen, Z. Xu, Y. Sun, X. Han, M. Liu and Y. Zhang, Energy Adv., 2022, 1, 1065–1070 RSC.
  39. T. N. Vinuth Raj, P. A. Hoskeri, S. Hamzad, M. S. Anantha, C. M. Joseph, H. B. Muralidhara, K. Yogesh Kumar, F. A. Alharti, B. H. Jeon and M. S. Raghu, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2022, 142, 109648 CrossRef CAS.
  40. S. Zhu, Y. Dai, J. Li, C. Ye, W. Zhou, R. Yu, X. Liao, J. Li, W. Zhang, W. Zong, R. Chen, G. He, D. Chao and Q. An, Sci. Bull., 2022, 67, 1882–1889 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. M. Narayanasamy, B. Kirubasankar, M. Shi, S. Velayutham, B. Wang, S. Angaiah and C. Yan, Chem. Commun., 2020, 56, 6412–6415 RSC.
  42. L. Zhang, M. Zhang, H. Guo, Z. Tian, L. Ge, G. He, J. Huang, J. Wang, T. Liu, I. P. Parkin and F. Lai, Adv. Sci., 2022, 9, 1–10 Search PubMed.
  43. W. Zong, H. Guo, Y. Ouyang, L. Mo, C. Zhou, G. Chao, J. Hofkens, Y. Xu, W. Wang, Y. E. Miao, G. He, I. P. Parkin, F. Lai and T. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2110016 CrossRef CAS.
  44. Y. Dai, C. Zhang, W. Zhang, L. Cui, C. Ye, X. Hong, J. Li, R. Chen, W. Zong, X. Gao, J. Zhu, P. Jiang, Q. An, D. J. L. Brett, I. P. Parkin, G. He and L. Mai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2023, 62, 1–7 Search PubMed.
  45. D. Bin, W. Huo, Y. Yuan, J. Huang, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, F. Dong, Y. Wang and Y. Xia, Chem, 2020, 6, 968–984 CAS.
  46. P. Sehrawat, A. Abid, S. S. Islam and A. Mauger, C, 2020, 6(4), 81 CAS.
  47. N. Zhang, Y. Dong, M. Jia, X. Bian, Y. Wang, M. Qiu, J. Xu, Y. Liu, L. Jiao and F. Cheng, ACS Energy Lett., 2018, 3(6), 1366–1372 CrossRef CAS.
  48. W. Li, K. Wang, S. Cheng and K. Jiang, Energy Storage Mater., 2018, 15, 14–21 CrossRef.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ya00158j

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023