Yuting
Bai
a,
Meirong
Han
a,
Xiangrui
Li
a,
Sisi
Feng
*ab,
Liping
Lu
*a and
Shengqian
Ma
*c
aInstitute of Molecular Science, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Molecular Engineering of the Education Ministry, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, P. R. China. E-mail: ssfeng@sxu.edu.cn; luliping@sxu.edu.cn
bKey Laboratory of Materials for Energy Conversion and Storage of Shanxi Province, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, P. R. China
cDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Texas CHEM 305D, 1508 W Mulberry St, Denton, TX 76201, USA. E-mail: Shengqian.Ma@unt.edu
First published on 25th April 2022
The composite photocatalyst based on a cerium(III) metal–organic framework (MOF-1 or 1), graphene oxide (GO), and Fe3O4 was constructed for the first time and was investigated for the degradation of chlortetracycline. A superior synergistic effect of graphene oxide and MOF-1 was achieved for improving photocatalysis. The optimal composite (1/GO/Fe3O4) with 9.0 wt% graphene oxide displayed the highest photocatalytic performance in the degradation of chlortetracycline with the help of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), with a removal rate of 80.5% in 180 minutes, which exhibited much higher photocatalytic performance than that of parent MOF-1. The enhanced photocatalytic performance was mainly attributed to the modification of graphene oxide, which can inhibit the recombination of the photogenerated carrier as an electron transporter and improve the absorption of visible light. Furthermore, the composite displayed superparamagnetic behavior that permitted the magnetic separation and convenient recovery of the photocatalyst from the reaction mixture. Importantly, the photocatalyst exhibited high stability and could be used recurrently. The photocatalytic mechanism involved the excitation of electrons from the VB to the CB in MOF-1 excited by visible light irradiation, the transport of electrons between MOF-1 and graphene oxide, and the generation of active groups (˙OH and ˙O2−).
Photocatalysis is an advanced oxidation process, which has shown promising performance in wastewater treatment. Organic pollutants can be effectively decomposed or degraded by active groups (e.g. ˙OH, ˙O2−), which are produced by photocatalysts under UV-light, visible light or the sunlight. Many reports have proved that H2O2 can boost the photocatalytic performance of catalysts by capturing photogenerated electrons to generate ˙OH.12 Recently, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have received great interest as novel environmental remediation materials for photocatalytic applications. Compared with conventional photocatalysts, most MOFs can use solar energy more efficiently because they can be modulated by the pore size of active sites to achieve the design and manufacture of the photocatalysts at the molecular level, and allow the good accommodation and rapid transport of guest molecules.13–15 These characteristics make MOFs photoresponsive catalysts, which can be induced to produce and transfer electrons between the interface of MOFs and H2O2 by light irradiation.
MOFs have been successfully used as a photocatalyst to degrade organic pollutants in wastewater. However, the dissatisfactory performance of pure MOFs, derived from the high recombination rate of photogenerated carriers, still needs to be improved. Further efforts have been devoted to improving the photocatalytic efficiency of MOFs. Currently, incorporating graphene oxide into MOFs has also been demonstrated to be a facile and effective strategy to achieve high photocatalytic activity.16 This may be attributed to the following three reasons: (1) abundant functional groups on the surface of graphene oxide can help to fasten the metal cations of MOFs and facilitate the growth of MOFs on its surface, without destruction of the coordination structure of MOFs;17–19 (2) excellent conductivity of the graphene oxide20 help to reduce electron/hole recombination efficiency, and improve the photocatalytic performance of MOFs simultaneously;21 (3) the large specific surface area of graphene oxide can be used as the carrier for MOF units, which plays a vital role in preventing the agglomeration of MOF particles in the layer and increasing the reactive sites. MOFs/GO composite materials combine the favorable properties of MOFs and graphene oxide. Recent attempts to fabricate MOF/graphene-based materials have achieved encouraging results.22,23 Yang et al.24 prepared a MIL-68(In)-NH2/GrO composite to degrade amoxicillin, resulting in higher removal efficiency of amoxicillin (∼93% at 120 min) than pure MIL-68(In)-NH2. Fakhri and co-workers25 synthesized a Zr-MOF@WO3/graphene oxide photocatalyst that showed highly enhanced photodegradation of tetracycline. These results demonstrate that MOF/graphene-based materials are a potential new class of photocatalysts for the photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no research on the degradation of chlortetracycline by MOFs. The composite photocatalyst discussed in this paper is the first study on the degradation of chlortetracycline by a material built on MOFs. Although there are some reports on the hybrid photocatalysts of MOF/GO, recycling from water is rarely achieved. Compositing super-paramagnetic Fe3O4 with the MOF/GO is an easy and efficient strategy26 that permitted the magnetic separation and convenient recovery of photocatalysts from the reaction mixture.27,28
Inspired by the above, in this work, we chose [Ce2(TCPB)2(DMF)(H2O)]n (MOF-1 or 1) composed of a 1,3,5-tris(4-carboxyphenoxy)benzene (H3tcpb) ligand as the functional material. A novel three-component 1/GO/Fe3O4 composite photocatalyst was prepared by incorporating graphene oxide and Fe3O4 into MOF-1 for the sake of achieving boosting photocatalysis. Chlortetracycline was chosen as the target pollutant to evaluate the photocatalytic ability. The structure, physical properties, and photocatalytic activity of 1/GO/Fe3O4 composite catalysts were compared with those of pure MOF-1. The degradation of chlortetracycline was optimized under various experimental conditions such as graphene oxide content, catalyst concentration, and H2O2 concentration. The feasible photocatalytic mechanism of chlortetracycline degradation was also proposed. The results of this work show that this novel composite photocatalyst can open a new avenue for unsolved problems in environmental treatment.
The carboxylate groups of tcpb3− anions link adjacent Ce3+ cations to develop a binuclear 1D chain with a Ce⋯Ce distance of 5.5405(5) (Fig. 1c), which is further connected by tcpb3− ligands forming a 2D layer (Fig. 1d). As shown in Fig. 1e, the 2D layers are alternately connected to a 3D supramolecular network via tcpb3− linkers. Topologically, the Ce3+ cation and tcpb3− ligand can be considered as two types of 6-connected nodes. Thus the structure of MOF-1 can be simplified as a 6-connected network with a point symbol of (411·64) (Fig. 1f).
The ternary photocatalyst was characterized by PXRD, and the results are presented in Fig. 2a. After incorporating graphene oxide and Fe3O4, 1/GO/Fe3O4 showed characteristic diffraction peaks of MOF-1 and Fe3O4 but no obvious characteristic peaks of graphene oxide, which may be attributed to the small recombination ratio of graphene oxide (9%) and weak diffraction peak intensity of graphene oxide.24 Similar phenomena have been reported in other research studies.18 The PXRD results demonstrated the existence of MOF-1 and Fe3O4 in the 1/GO/Fe3O4 ternary photocatalyst.
Fig. 2 PXRD patterns (a) and FT-IR spectra (b) of GO, Fe3O4, MOF-1, and 1/GO/Fe3O4 (solid, temperature: 25 °C). |
The functional groups of the photocatalyst were identified by FT-IR (Fig. 2b). In graphene oxide, the characteristic absorption peaks at 3440, 1728, 1624, 1389, and 1107 cm−1 were assigned to the O–H, CO, CC, C–O, and C–O–C stretching vibrations, respectively, suggesting the existence of many oxygen-containing hydrophilic groups.29 As for MOF-1, the peaks at 1600 and 1533 cm−1 were assigned to the CC stretching vibrations; the peaks at 1400 and 1230 cm−1 corresponded to the C–H formation vibration and C–O–C stretching vibration. After incorporating Fe3O4, 1/GO/Fe3O4 preserved the characteristic peaks of MOF-1 and Fe3O4, demonstrating the successful synthesis of the ternary composite. Nevertheless, there are no obvious characteristic peaks of graphene oxide in the FT-IR spectra of the composites due to the high dispersion of graphene oxide.30 Therefore, the results of FT-IR also only verified the incorporation of MOF-1 and Fe3O4.
To further ascertain the existence of graphene oxide and Fe3O4, SEM was performed, which was favorable for understanding the surface morphologies and microstructures of the material. It can be seen from Fig. 3a and b that MOF-1 was successfully dispersed on graphene oxide. This phenomenon was consistent with our assumption that metal cations were well anchored on the surface of the graphene oxide sheets by oxygen-containing groups which acted as seed sites for the recombination of MOF-1 and graphene oxide, reflecting strong interactions between MOF-1 and graphene oxide. As shown in Fig. 3c and d, Fe3O4 nanoparticles with a uniform size of about 400 nm were dispersed on the surface of graphene oxide under ultrasonication, which was further confirmed by the fact that incorporation of Fe3O4 enabled the composite to be recovered under an external magnetic field (Fig. S5†). So the 1/GO/Fe3O4 composite was distinctly formed.
The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of MOF-1 and 1/GO/Fe3O4 were performed to figure out the specific surface area and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore size. The porosity of MOF-1 was too small to be considered, and the interaction between MOF-1 and chlortetracycline was probably due to surface adsorption. After incorporating graphene oxide, the 1/GO/Fe3O4 composite exhibited a larger specific area (16.35 m2 g−1) with the existence of mesoporous, and its isotherms belonged to the type IV curve with a narrow H3 hysteresis loop (Fig. S3†).31 The results demonstrated that the addition of graphene oxide can boost the specific surface area of the composite.
The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of MOF-1 and 1/GO/Fe3O4 were studied to evaluate the optical properties (Fig. 4). MOF-1 exhibited broad absorption in the range of 230–400 nm. After incorporating graphene oxide, 1/GO/Fe3O4 exhibited a new broad absorption in the visible region (400–800 nm), which may be attributed to the coupling between Ce3+ cations and oxygen-containing functional groups of graphene oxide, so it can be effectively excited by visible light.32 Moreover, the color of the sample changed significantly (Fig. S4†). The pure MOF-1 was primrose, while the 1/GO and 1/GO/Fe3O4 samples were uniform grey and brown, respectively, indicating the existence of graphene oxide. These results are in agreement with previous observations in other GO-based composites.33
Fig. 4 UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of MOF-1 and the 1/GO/Fe3O4 composite (solid, temperature: 25 °C). |
The effect of graphene oxide amounts on photocatalytic efficiency was investigated and is displayed in Fig. 5b. When the loading graphene oxide amount changed from 5 wt% to 9 wt%, the degradation efficiency significantly increased from 59.9% to 80.5%. However, when the graphene oxide amount is further increased, its degradation efficiency began to decrease, which may be attributed to the shield of the active sites of MOF-1 by excessive graphene oxide.30,34 The results manifest that the optimum amount of graphene oxide is the key to improving the photocatalytic efficiency. The best degradation efficiency of 1/GO/Fe3O4-9 was up to 80.5% under H2O2/Vis conditions, which may be ascribed to the increased active sites, large light absorption efficiency, and high electron–hole separation efficiency. By analyzing first-order kinetics plots of the catalysts, it can be seen that the degradation rate constants of 1/GO/Fe3O4-5, 1/GO/Fe3O4-9, 1/GO/Fe3O4-15, and 1/GO/Fe3O4-22 are 0.0052, 0.0092, 0.0066, and 0.0060 min−1, respectively (Fig. S6†). The kinetic constants of 1/GO/Fe3O4-9 were 1.8, 1.4, and 1.5 times higher than those of 1/GO/Fe3O4-5, 1/GO/Fe3O4-15, and 1/GO/Fe3O4-22, respectively. Therefore, the optimal graphene oxide loading ratio in the 1/GO/Fe3O4 composite is 9 wt%. Compared with similar studies shown in Table 1, it is clear that the catalyst in this work has a better comprehensive evaluation concerning the degradation efficiency and recyclability.
[PhotoCatalyst] (g L−1) | [Antibiotics] (mg L−1) | Light source | Degradation (%) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
JLUE-MOG-1 (1.0) | CTC (100) | Xenon lamp (300 W) | 100.0 (40 minutes) | 37 |
TiO2 (1.0) | CTC (10) | UVA | 95.5 (120 minutes) | 38 |
BP-BVO (1.5) | CTC (10) | LED lamp (100 W) | 88.0 (120 minutes) | 39 |
1/GO/Fe3O4 (0.45) | CTC (20) | Xenon lamp (300 W) | 80.5 (180 minutes) | This work |
SnFe2O4 (1.0) | CTC (50) | Iodine tungsten lamp (300 W) | 75.0 (150 minutes) | 40 |
Cu3P-ZnSnO3-g-C3N4 (1.0) | CTC (10) | Xenon lamp (500 W) | 63.5 (60 minutes) | 41 |
TiO2-NS/Pt/GO (0.2) | CTC (50) | Xenon lamp (500 W) | 45.0 (90 minutes) | 42 |
The effect of the composite catalyst dosage was tested and the results are presented in Fig. 5c. The degradation efficiency of chlortetracycline increased from 64.7% to 80.5% as the 1/GO/Fe3O4 concentration changed from 0.25 to 0.45 g L−1. It was probably because an appropriate increase of the catalyst concentration can provide more active sites for photocatalysis, leading to the promotion of chlortetracycline degradation. However, when the catalyst concentration further increased to 0.55 g L−1, the declination of degradation efficiency was observed. It was owing to the excessive particles, catalyst aggregation, turbidity increment and light scattering that occurred in the reaction solution, which resulted in the inhibition of photon penetration, the reduction of active sites, and thus the decrease of the degradation efficiency. So the optimum composite catalyst concentration was 0.45 g L−1.35
Since H2O2 can obviously enhance the photocatalyst activity, the effect of H2O2 concentration was also studied. As presented in Fig. 5d, different H2O2 concentrations (from 5 to 20 mM) were investigated. It was apparent that the degradation efficiency of chlortetracycline in 180 minutes increased from 70.1 to 80.5% with an increase in the H2O2 concentration from 5 to 10 mM. Because more ˙OH radicals can be generated to degrade chlortetracycline. However, a further increase of the H2O2 concentration to 20 mM would result in a decrease of chlortetracycline degradation (75.3%), which may be attributed to the scavenging effect of excessive H2O2 to ˙OH radicals. Accordingly, an optimum H2O2 concentration of 10 mM could be found.36
In practical applications, it is crucial to study the stability of the photocatalyst during the photocatalytic process. To evaluate the stability and reusability of 1/GO/Fe3O4, photodegradation of chlortetracycline was carried out repeatedly under visible light. The photocatalyst was recycled by an applied magnetic field and washed with distilled water for the next cycle. As shown in Fig. 6a, there was no evident loss of photocatalytic performance for chlortetracycline degradation over 1/GO/Fe3O4 after six cycles, which supported that 1/GO/Fe3O4 possessed excellent stability in photocatalytic performance. Furthermore, the PXRD and FT-IR of 1/GO/Fe3O4 before and after the chlortetracycline degradation were performed and the results are shown in Fig. S7a and b.† The PXRD patterns and FT-IR spectra of composites were identical to the fresh ones, proving outstanding stability.43 The pH of the solution is another key factor that can remarkably affect photocatalysis. The effect of initial pH on the degradation efficiency of chlortetracycline using 1/GO/Fe3O4 was determined. As shown in Fig. 6b, 1/GO/Fe3O4 exhibited relatively good and stable catalytic performance in the pH range of 3.0 to 7.0. When the pH increased to 8.0, the photodegradation process was hindered significantly, which may be attributed to that acidic conditions were more conducive to the production of ˙OH. However, an extreme acid solution may result in poor performance in photodegradation processes. This result demonstrates that 1/GO/Fe3O4 can work effectively in a wide range of pH. Based on the above results, the 1/GO/Fe3O4 composite can be expected as a promising candidate for organic pollutant removal in practical applications because of its excellent photocatalytic performance and outstanding chemical stability.
Fig. 6 (a) Recycling tests for the degradation of chlortetracycline by the 1/GO/Fe3O4-9 composite. (b) Effects of the initial pH on the degradation of chlortetracycline. |
There are some co-existing species in actual wastewater, such as inorganic salts and even organics, which may affect the degradation efficiency of the photocatalyst.44 To evaluate the practical application potential, the photocatalytic performance of the composite was explored in simulated wastewater samples including chlortetracycline with known concentrations in real tap water and river water, respectively. As shown in Fig. S8,† the degradation ability of the composite photocatalyst was not significantly affected in real water samples, indicating the possibility of practical application. The water quality parameters of tap water and river water are listed in Table S3.†
The photoluminescence emission is produced by the recombination of photoinduced electron–hole pairs, so photoluminescence analysis can be employed to prove the separation efficiency of the charge carriers in the composite.48 As shown in Fig. 8a, MOF-1 displayed strong photoluminescence emission when excited at 290 nm, while the emission intensity of 1/GO/Fe3O4 decreased significantly, which confirmed a decreased recombination of the photogenerated carriers in 1/GO/Fe3O4. Combined with the structural analysis of the composite, the interfacial contact between MOF-1 and graphene oxide can enhance the separation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs and prolong the carrier lifetime, which would benefit the enhancement of the photocatalytic performance of 1/GO/Fe3O4.
To further illustrate the effect of graphene oxide on photocatalytic performance, EIS measurements of MOF-1 and 1/GO/Fe3O4 were employed to study the process of charge transfer and recombination.49 As shown in Fig. 8b, 1/GO/Fe3O4 showed a smaller radius of Nyquist arc than pure MOF-1, proving that an interfacial charge transferred to graphene oxide as the electron acceptor and led to the effective separation of photogenerated carriers in the photocatalytic reaction.50 Similar results were obtained by other studies.51–53 Besides, the EIS result was consistent with the photoluminescence analysis, proving that coating graphene oxide was an effective technique to improve the photocatalytic performance.
The enhanced charge transfer efficiency could also be evidenced by the experiment on transient photocurrent responses.54 As presented in Fig. 8c, the photocurrent density of 1/GO/Fe3O4-9 was superior to those of the other three composite samples, indicating the improved separation efficiency of photogenerated charge carriers in 1/GO/Fe3O4-9.55 This result was in agreement with the photocatalytic performance, confirming the optimum amount of graphene oxide in the composite. The photocurrent density of MOF-1 was also tested, and the MOF itself had almost no photocurrent.
To examine the arrangement of energy levels, the electronic band structures of MOF-1 and graphene oxide were examined by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy. According to the data from ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy, the work function (Φ, the difference between the Fermi level and the vacuum level) and the valence band maximum (EVBM) can be figured out. The EVBM of MOF-1 was located at 2.14 eV, below the Fermi level (EFermi), while Φ of MOF-1 was quantified at 4.43 eV versus vacuum level (vs. vacuum) using the cutoff energy (Fig. S9a and S9b†).48,56 The EFermi and EVBM values in electron volts can be converted into electrochemical energy potentials in volts according to the reference standard in which 0 V versus normal hydrogen electrode (vs. NHE) equaled −4.44 eV vs. vacuum. Therefore, the EFermi and EVBM of MOF-1 were determined to be −0.01 V and 2.13 V (vs. NHE), respectively. Combined with the band-gap energies (Fig. S9c†) obtained from UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra and the empirical formula EVB = ECB + Eg, the conduction band minimum potential (ECBM) of MOF-1 was calculated to be −0.67 eV (vs. NHE). According to Fig. S10,† the Fermi position of graphene oxide was figured out to be 0.3 V (vs. NHE). The transfer of photogenerated electrons at the interface between semiconductors depended on their Fermi level. Owing to the coupling between Ce3+ cations and oxygen-containing functional groups of graphene oxide in the 1/GO/Fe3O4 composite, MOF-1 can be excited to yield photogenerated electron–hole pairs by visible light. Once MOF-1 and graphene oxide were coupled, the photogenerated electrons in MOF-1 can spontaneously transfer to the graphene oxide until their Fermi levels reached the dynamic equilibrium state (Fig. 9a). Thus, the MOF-1 surface will accumulate positive charges and the graphene oxide surface will accumulate negative charges. Ultimately, an internal built-in electric field directed from MOF-1 to graphene oxide at the interface was constructed, which helped to reduce the recombination of electrons and holes, thereby improving the photocatalytic performance.
Fig. 9 (a) Energy band offset diagram and hetero-phase junction interface charge property. (b) Energy level diagram (vs. NHE) of the photocatalytic system. |
To further confirm the results of ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy, Mott–Schottky tests were performed to obtain the flat-band potential (EFB) of MOF-1. As shown in Fig. S9d,† the calculated EFB of MOF-1 was −0.65 eV (vs. NHE). For n-type semiconductors, the ECB of the semiconductor was more negative (∼0.1 eV) than the EFB.57 Therefore, the ECB of MOF-1 was about −0.75 eV. It is worth noting that the ECB of MOF-1 measured by Mott–Schottky plots was in good agreement with the ECBM derived from ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy.39 Given the more negative ECBM of MOF-1 in comparison to the reduction potential of O2/˙O2−, it was theoretically feasible for x2d9O2− generation to occur (Fig. 9b). Since the EVBM for MOF-1 was smaller than the redox potential of ˙OH/OH− (2.38 eV vs. NHE), ˙OH cannot be generated. However, it was reasonable to speculate that the reduction of H2O2 can produce ˙OH by photogenerated electrons in the 1/GO/Fe3O4-H2O2-Vis system (H2O2 + e− → OH− + ˙OH).58 This should be the result of the synergistic effect in the H2O2-containing catalytic system. Similar to the trapping experiment results of active species, ˙O2− and h+ had more contribution than ˙OH in photocatalytic performance.
Combined with the existing literature,41,59 LC-MS was used to accurately detect and identify the possible photodegradation intermediates of chlortetracycline. As presented in Fig. S11a and b,† there was only one peak at m/z = 479.1 before the irradiation, which was identified as the molecular ion peak of chlortetracycline. After photocatalytic degradation, the initial concentration of chlortetracycline decreased at the retention time of 7.09 minutes, indicating the effective degradation of chlortetracycline (Fig. S11c†). The mass spectrum of the degradation of chlortetracycline illustrated in Fig. S11d and e† contains four transformation products, compounds I (m/z 510.88, R.T., 12.80 min), II (m/z 418.78, R.T., 12.77 min), III (m/z 316.95, R.T., 12.80 min), and IV (m/z 248.96, R.T., 12.80 min), respectively. Based on these intermediates, two possible degradation pathways of chlortetracycline are proposed in Scheme 1. By the ongoing degradation process, these intermediates may eventually be mineralized into CO2, H2O, Cl−, etc.10,60,61 The ICP data of the degraded solution showed that the content of iron ions in the solution was only 0.04%, which proved that Fe3O4 did not participate in the catalytic reaction.
Scheme 1 Possible degradation pathway of chlortetracycline in the 1/GO/Fe3O4 composite photocatalytic system. |
Based on the above characterization studies and corresponding analyses, the boosting photocatalytic mechanism of 1/GO/Fe3O4 was attributed to the synergistic effect of graphene oxide and Fe3O4 with MOF-1. Graphene oxide with substantial functional groups acted as a template for the growth of MOF-1, providing more reactive sites for photocatalysis, and served as an electron acceptor in the photocatalytic reaction, further extracting electrons from MOF-1 and thus improving the photocatalytic performance. Furthermore, the presence of Fe3O4 surmounted the restriction that a powder photocatalyst was not easy to recover. Under visible light irradiation, MOF-1 was excited and therefore generated photogenerated electrons (e−) and holes (h+). Meanwhile, 1/GO/Fe3O4 can generate ˙OH by catalyzing the decomposition of H2O2. Therefore, graphene oxide acts as an efficient electron capture trap in cooperation with MOFs to further extend the lifetime of photocarriers, which together with ˙OH leads to effective chlortetracycline degradation.
1/GO/Fe3O4 + hv → 1/GO/Fe3O4 (e− + h+) | (1) |
1/GO/Fe3O4 (e−) + GO → 1/GO/Fe3O4 + GO (e−) | (2) |
GO (e−) + O2 → ˙O2− + GO | (3) |
H2O2 + e− → ˙OH + OH− | (4) |
˙O2− (h+/˙OH) + CTC → other products | (5) |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Crystal details, PXRD, FT-IR, TGA and LC-MS. CCDC 2094467. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d2qi00412g |
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2022 |