Issue 1, 2015

Much ado about α: reframing the debate over appropriate fate descriptors in nanoparticle environmental risk modeling

Abstract

Large-scale fate and transport models have used different approaches to account for engineered nanoparticle (ENP) heteroaggregation and its effects on fate. Praetorius et al. and Cornelis, in recent Perspectives in this journal, favor the use of particle number-based kinetic models and attachment efficiency, α, in place of mass-based approaches relying on partition coefficients, or Kd values, because the former is more theoretically faithful to the particulate nature of ENPs. Here, we provide perspective on these two popular modeling frameworks, particle balance and mass balance, with regards to their ability to capture ENP fate processes at large scales. We show that particle balance using α is not unique in its ability to describe ENP heteroaggregation kinetically, since mathematically equivalent rates can be created for mass balance, and that the ability of particle balance to accurately describe particle behaviors is still severely hindered by evolving scientific understanding of ENP heteroaggregation. Ultimately, we find that models at this scale are relatively insensitive to the particulate nature of ENPs. In the short term, mass-based models that rely on simple heuristics can be more practical, and less error-prone, than particle balance alternatives using α.

Graphical abstract: Much ado about α: reframing the debate over appropriate fate descriptors in nanoparticle environmental risk modeling

Article information

Article type
Perspective
Submitted
16 okt 2014
Accepted
09 dec 2014
First published
11 dec 2014

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2015,2, 27-32

Much ado about α: reframing the debate over appropriate fate descriptors in nanoparticle environmental risk modeling

A. L. Dale, G. V. Lowry and E. A. Casman, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2015, 2, 27 DOI: 10.1039/C4EN00170B

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements