Yaning
Fan
a,
Junjun
Zhang
*a,
Kongliang
Luo
a,
Xuanyu
Zhou
a,
Jiahua
Zhao
b,
Weiwei
Bao
c,
Hui
Su
d,
Nailiang
Wang
*a,
Pengfei
Zhang
ab and
Zhenghong
Luo
ab
aState Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China. E-mail: zhangjj089@nxu.edu.cn; wangnl@nxu.edu.cn
bSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, P. R. China
cNational & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Slag Comprehensive Utilization and Environmental Technology, School of Material Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, 723000 P. R. China
dDepartment of Chemistry, FRQNT Centre for Green Chemistry and Catalysis, McGill University, 801 Sherbrooke Street W., Montreal, QC H3A 0B8, Canada
First published on 9th November 2023
Improving the water oxidation performance of non-precious nanoelectrocatalysts is the key to developing green hydrogen energy. Herein, we developed a simple method to synthesize FeOOH nanocatalysts with low crystallinity and oxygen vacancies (VO). These catalysts demonstrate excellent electrocatalytic performance for water oxidation. The VO-FeOOH catalyst exhibits an overpotential of 255 mV at 10 mA cm−2 and maintains stability for more than 120 hours at a high current output (50 mA cm−2). DFT calculations show that the rate-determining step (RDS) of VO-FeOOH and FeOOH is O* to OOH* (the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) of the RDS is 1.65 eV and 1.91 eV, respectively). This result indicates that VO can effectively reduce the energy barrier from *O to *OOH of the OER process, thus improving the activity of the VO-FeOOH nanocatalysts. Our focus was on utilizing one of the abundant metallic elements to fabricate defect-rich OER electrocatalysts with improved performance through a convenient one-step synthesis approach. This methodology shows great promise for the development of high-performance catalysts.
The electrolysis of water, a hydrogen production process characterized by mild reaction conditions and minimum equipment requirements, has been continuously evolving.5 Water electrolysis can be mainly divided into the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), where the OER plays a crucial role throughout the reaction, but its inherent slow kinetic process hinders its development.6 The R&D of high-performance catalysts can effectively reduce the overpotential required for the OER process, and noble metal-based catalysts are currently the most efficient OER electrocatalysts.7 However, the scarcity of raw materials severely limits the large-scale application and commercial production.8,9 Therefore, the preparation of low-cost, efficient, and stable non-precious metal-based nanocatalysts is a key strategy to improve the OER and promote water electrolysis.10,11
In recent years, transition metal-based phosphides,12 borides,13 nitrides,14 hydroxides,15 and sulfides16 have attracted much interest as OER catalysts. Hydroxides exhibit superior electrocatalytic activity compared to noble metals IrO2 and RuO2.17 However, due to the low conductivity and the cumbersome preparation process, the utilization of FeOOH catalyst is in the initial stage.18 Three main factors influence the intrinsic property of iron(III) oxyhydroxide. First, FeOOH can be classified into four crystal structures: α (orthorhombic), β (tetragonal), δ (hexagonal), and γ (orthorhombic),19 of which β-FeOOH exhibits the highest OER activity.20,21 Furthermore, recent studies have reported that the performance of mixed-phase FeOOH is superior to that of single-phase crystals, mainly due to its higher VO.22 The second factor affecting its performance is crystallinity. Amorphous FeOOH provides abundant random orientations and unsaturated bonds for water molecules and intermediate reactions.23 The results indicate that the performance of mixed amorphous-crystalline structures surpasses that of single-phase amorphous or highly crystalline species.24 The last factor is the formation of cation or anion vacancies. Their formation leads to electron modulation and the formation of unsaturated bonds,25 thus improving the conductivity of species and OER electrocatalytic performance. At present, the main methods of generating oxygen vacancies are thermal treatment, anion/cation doping, plasma treatment, and other technical treatments (laser, flame, stripping, and template strategy).26 The reduction of NaBH4 can effectively introduce VO on the surface of the catalyst material. So far, NaBH4 reduction has been widely used to produce VO in Co3O4, CoFe2O4, NiMn2O4, Fe–Co oxides, etc.27–29
Herein, we proposed a one-step reaction method to prepare FeOOH nanosheets with low crystallinity and abundant defects. This nanocatalyst was attached to a nickel foam (NF) surface using an organic binder, and its electrochemical results demonstrated excellent catalytic properties (activity and stability). As an OER catalyst, VO-FeOOH exhibits good catalytic activity, characterized by low overpotential, reaction dynamics, and stability. At a current output of 10 milliamperes per cm2, the required overpotential was 255 mV. It exhibited stability exceeding 120 h at a current output of 50 milliamperes per cm2, surpassing most similar catalysts in terms of efficiency and stability. The low crystalline structure of the FeOOH nanosheet and the presence of VO resulted in a high specific surface area with open spaces, abundant transfer channels,18 and exposure to more active sites, as well as the formation of unsaturated coordination bonds, which accelerated charge transfer. Through detailed theoretical calculation and analysis, it is shown that the energy barrier of key rate-limiting steps is reduced by the introduction of oxygen defects. This is of certain guiding significance for the development of OER nanocatalysts.
Furthermore, the high-resolution Fe 2p spectrum of VO-FeOOH, as depicted in Fig. 1b, exhibits two prominent peaks centered at 711.1 eV and 724.4 eV, which correspond to Fe 2p1/2 and Fe 2p3/2.32 It shows that Fe (II) is the main component of the VO-FeOOH sample, and it also shows that unsaturated coordination bonds are formed in the sample, respectively. Additionally, two satellite peaks centered at 718.1 eV and 732.8 eV are attributed to these respective Fe 2p peaks.33 According to the data presented in Fig. 1c, the spectrum of the nuclear energy level of the O 1s exhibits three distinct peaks. These peaks, located at 529.8 eV, 531 eV, and 531.8 eV, can be attributed to O2− species, OH− groups, and adsorbed oxygen species, respectively.34
In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis revealed that the VO-FeOOH sample exhibited a nanosheet morphology (Fig. 1e). This nanosheet structure provided an increased number of exposed active sites on the surface, thereby facilitating adsorption and dissociation reactions within the reaction medium. Furthermore, the corresponding Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) analysis also indicated that the VO-FeOOH sample had a significant specific surface area and a mesoporous structure concentrated in the range of 2–50 nm (Fig. 1d and S5†). According to the image presented in Fig. 1f, the nanosheet structure was further characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), revealing distinct morphological features with a thin lamellar structure. To determine the thickness of VO-FeOOH nanosheets, atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements were performed, yielding a measured thickness of approximately 150 nm, which is consistent with the results observed by the SEM image (Fig. S6†). As the OER catalytic layer, the thickness of the nanosheets not only facilitates the exposure of more active sites but also resists the impact of bubble release, thus stabilizing the catalytic process.35 Additionally, HRTEM investigations indicated that the lattice structure of VO-FeOOH exhibited a low-crystalline configuration. In particular, lattice fringes corresponding to the crystal plane of VO-FeOOH (211) were discernible in selected regions (Fig. 1g), providing evidence of the inherent low crystallinity of the VO-FeOOH sample. To directly study the phase structure of VO-FeOOH, the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of HRTEM images was used for analysis. Fig. 2g (I), (II), and (III) show three different FFT modes extracted from the red, orange, and green squares of Fig. 2g, which exhibit two wide and blurred halo diffraction rings (Fig. 2h) without any identifiable diffraction points, further revealing the characteristics of long-range disorder but short-term order.36 The lattice fringe width of VO-FeOOH was measured to be 0.26 nm from Fig. 1i. Compared with the (211) crystal plane of standard FeOOH, the lattice of the (211) crystal plane of low crystalline VO-FeOOH was increased by about 2.36%. The formation of low crystalline species likely causes the lattice of FeOOH to produce tensile strain.37
The tensile strain of the VO-FeOOH lattice was further studied by lattice images obtained from HRTEM images by inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) mode (Fig. S7†). The corresponding IFFT image shows that the lattice fringes on the (211) crystal plane have obvious tensile strain. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) mode of VO-FeOOH shows that the diffraction ring is widened, which belongs to the typical low crystalline state (Fig. 1j).38 The energy dispersive X-ray (EDS) element mapping image of VO-FeOOH demonstrated an even distribution of Fe and O within the VO-FeOOH sample (Fig. 1k and S8†). Therefore, the coordination of unsaturated bonds and micro-pores and nanosheet structures of low-crystalline species have significant electrolyte permeability advantages, which are conducive to the rapid migration of electrons and electrolyte ions, thereby improving the catalytic performance.
The kinetics of the VO-FeOOH samples were further evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and Tafel slopes. The results revealed that VO-FeOOH (63.96 mV dec−1) has a lower Tafel slope than the commercial catalysts IrO2 (81.94 mV dec−1) and NF (104.55 mV dec−1), elucidating that the catalyst has faster OER dynamics (Fig. 2c). The measured EIS data were fitted using an equivalent circuit diagram (Fig. S10†), and the results revealed that VO-FeOOH has a smaller charge transfer resistance and faster electrochemical OER catalytic characteristics (Fig. 2d). To further reveal the activity of VO-FeOOH, IrO2, and NF, the electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) (Fig. S11†) was determined by electric double layer capacitance (Cdl). The Cdl value of VO-FeOOH is 4.96 mF cm−2, which is higher than that of other contrast samples (Fig. 2e), indicating that there are more active sites exposed on the surface of VO-FeOOH and the OER activity is higher. The ECSA of VO-FeOOH was calculated to be 124 cm2, and its large active area should be due to its nanosheet morphology and porous structure (Fig. 2a and S5†). When the LSV curve is normalized to ECSA, VO-FeOOH exhibits higher catalytic activity than that of IrO2 and NF (Fig. 2f), demonstrating that the large specific surface area and the structure of the oxygen vacancy improve its intrinsic activity.
The intrinsic reaction kinetics of the electrode/electrolyte interface was studied by in situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).39Fig. 2g and S12† depict Nyquist plots for various catalysts, revealing that the resistance decreases with increasing external voltage. When compared to IrO2 and NF catalysts, the VO-FeOOH catalyst exhibits the lowest resistance across all potentials, indicating that the presence of oxygen vacancies significantly enhances the adsorption kinetics of oxygen-containing reactive species during the alkaline water oxidation process. The Bode diagram illustrates the phase relaxation process of the catalyst sample, as demonstrated in Fig. 2h and S13† for the VO-FeOOH, IrO2, and NF samples. Peaks in the low and high-frequency regions correspond to the charge transfer reaction occurring at the electrolyte and catalyst interface, as well as electron conduction within the catalyst's inner layer at high frequencies.40 As the potential increases, the electron transfer resistance in the reaction process decreases notably. In the case of VO-FeOOH, IrO2, and NF electrodes, as the potential increases, the phase angle shifts towards the high-frequency region. Compared with that of the carbon cloth, the first phase angle of NF appears at 0.55 V, while that of the carbon cloth appears at 0.6 V (Fig. S14†),41 indicating that the substrate itself has high intrinsic activity. The catalyst supported on the NF surface effectively promotes the electron transfer between the electrolyte and the catalyst, thereby promoting electron conduction. These results indicate that VO-FeOOH, IrO2, and NF share similar interfacial reaction characteristics.35,42,43
For electrocatalysis, good stability is an important application index.44 The LSV curve and EIS of the VO-FeOOH sample after 500 cycles in Fig. 3a and b show that the activity of VO-FeOOH after CV cycles is slightly improved, and the charge transfer resistance is slightly reduced. This may be due to the incomplete activation of the catalyst in the early stage, demonstrating that the VO-FeOOH catalyst has good stability under dynamic current. Fig. 3c and d show that the VO-FeOOH catalyst can remain stable at different current potentials and densities. The chronopotentiometry curve in Fig. 3e and Fig. S15† shows that the VO-FeOOH catalyst has good durability after the 120 h and 45 h OER test at 50 mA cm−2 and 100 mA cm−2, respectively, and the potential change can be ignored. However, the commercial catalyst IrO2 has a significant performance decline in less than 20 hours of operation. The VO-FeOOH sample has a higher catalytic stability than the IrO2 catalyst. It can also be explained that the VO-FeOOH coated on the surface of NF does not fall off, which proves that it is a feasible method to coat the nanocatalyst on the surface of NF.
To further evaluate the overall water splitting performance of the Vo-FeOOH catalyst, we used Pt/C and VO-FeOOH to assemble an electrolytic cell (Fig. S16a and b†). The results show that, under the same conditions, the VO-FeOOH||Pt/C electrolytic cell has better performance than the RuO2||Pt/C commercial catalyst electrolytic cell (Fig. S16c†). It is worth noting that the performance of the catalyst did not show a downward trend in the long-term stability at 10 mA cm−2, which is consistent with the results of the three-electrode system, indicating that it has excellent stability (Fig. S16d†). To explore the effect of catalyst morphology on stability, we characterized the catalyst supported on NF by SEM and TEM. The corresponding results showed that the morphology of the catalyst did not change significantly during the long-term stability test (Fig. S17a–c†). At the same time, HRTEM also proved that the phase of the catalyst did not change before and after the OER operation (Fig. S17d and e†).
To compare the electrocatalytic performance and mechanism of highly crystalline FeOOH and low crystalline VO-FeOOH, we prepared highly crystalline FeOOH samples using the previously reported wet chemical method (Fig. S18†).21 The HRTEM image of FeOOH clearly shows that it has neatly arranged lattice fringes with a width of 0.151 nm, which belongs to the (002) crystal plane of FeOOH, indicating that it has high crystallinity (Fig. S19†). We have experimentally studied the defects of catalysts and demonstrated that the defects enhance the electron transfer and the activity of individual sites in the catalytic process. Raman spectroscopy is known to be sensitive to defects and lattice disorder.45 As depicted in Fig. 4a, the conspicuous Raman peaks at 215, 279, and 391 cm−1 correspond to the asymmetric stretching vibrations between the metal and hydroxide ions in the highly crystalline FeOOH catalyst.46 These observations align with the characteristic crystalline features of FeOOH, providing further confirmation of its high crystallinity. The corresponding peak positions indicate that FeOOH exhibits Raman activity.47 Meanwhile, the Raman spectrum of VO-FeOOH showed a reduction in peak intensities corresponding to the characteristic peaks and the formation of a broad band, which aligns with the spectroscopic features of low crystallinity.48,49 The coexistence of Fe and O in the FeOOH sample was observed through the full spectrum of XPS (Fig. S20†). By fitting the high-resolution O 1s spectra of VO-FeOOH and FeOOH in Fig. S21,† it was observed that the VO peak area of the VO-FeOOH sample was distinctly larger than that of FeOOH, pointing that VO-FeOOH has more VO than FeOOH.
Fig. 4 (a) The Raman spectra, (b) EPR spectra, (c) LSV curve, (d) EIS spectrum, (e) Tafel slope of VO-FeOOH and FeOOH, and (f) calculated TOF values of VO-FeOOH and FeOOH at 1.55 V and 1.60 V. |
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy analysis also confirmed this conclusion (Fig. 4b). At g = 2.003, VO-FeOOH exhibited a stronger symmetric EPR signal compared to FeOOH, confirming the formation of VO in VO-FeOOH. At the same time, by comparing the peak area of Fe2+ in VO-FeOOH and FeOOH (Fig. S22†), it can be found that the area of Fe2+ in VO-FeOOH is larger than that in FeOOH, indicating that the formation of low valence Fe2+ is caused by VO species.50 Subsequent electrochemical results revealed that low-crystallinity VO-FeOOH exhibited higher electrochemical catalytic activity (Fig. 4c) and low-overpotential (Fig. S23†), faster electron transfer rate (Fig. 4d), and smaller Tafel slope (Fig. 4e) compared to high-crystallinity FeOOH. Further Cdl results also revealed that VO-FeOOH had a larger effective electrochemical specific surface area (ECSA) compared to FeOOH (Fig. S24†).
The intrinsic property of nanocatalysts is closely related to the turnover frequency (TOF),44 as shown in Fig. 4f. The TOF values of VO-FeOOH and FeOOH at potentials of 1.55 V and 1.60 V were 0.04 and 0.021 s−1, and 0.104 and 0.04 s−1, respectively, indicating that the presence of low crystallinity and VO species enhanced the property of the VO-FeOOH electrode. The corresponding BET results also indicated that the low-crystallinity VO-FeOOH had a larger specific surface area (156.40 m2 g−1) compared to the high-crystallinity FeOOH (123.58 m2 g−1) (Fig. 1d and S25a†), together with a more concentrated mesoporous distribution (Fig. S5 and S25b†). In conclusion, the research results suggest that low-crystallinity VO-FeOOH facilitates the formation of VO, thereby enhancing the formation of unsaturated sites and conductivity and thus improving the electrocatalytic activity of the OER process.
Then we continue to study the OER catalytic activity of VO-FeOOH, and further calculate the different models (Fig. S27 and S28†) based on the ΔG change of the 4e− pathway to elucidate the water oxidation energy barrier of VO-FeOOH and FeOOH counterpart.53 The OER process of the widely accepted AEM mechanism can be divided into four stages, including three intermediate states (OH*, O*, and OOH*) (Fig. 5d). All possible reaction paths on VO-FeOOH are shown in Fig. 5d and e, and the reaction path with the highest energy required is O* → OOH*, indicating that this step is the RDS in VO-FeOOH and FeOOH counterpart. The ΔGmax in VO-FeOOH is 1.65 eV, which is less than the 1.91 eV in FeOOH, indicating that VO contributes to the formation of more strong active sites in VO-FeOOH, thereby enhancing the OER performance of VO-FeOOH samples. The DFT calculation showed that the defects optimized the adsorption capacity of the intermediates during the corresponding catalytic process, effectively reduced the energy barrier, and finally improved the catalytic efficiency and stability. On the whole, we improved the oxygen defect level of the FeOOH nanocatalyst through a simple strategy, and used the defects to improve the activation ability of the rate-limiting step of the water oxidation process, and finally improved the activity and stability of cheap iron(III) oxyhydroxide.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3qi02043f |
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2024 |