Rory P.
Kelly
a,
Marta
Falcone
a,
Carlos Alvarez
Lamsfus
b,
Rosario
Scopelliti
a,
Laurent
Maron
b,
Karsten
Meyer
c and
Marinella
Mazzanti
*a
aInstitut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail: marinella.mazzanti@epfl.ch
bUniversité de Toulouse et CNRS INSA, UPS, CNRS, UMR 5215, LPCNO, 135 avenue de Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse, France
cDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Inorganic Chemistry, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstraße 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
First published on 5th June 2017
Herein, we report the synthesis and characterisation of the first terminal uranium(V) sulfide and a related UV trithiocarbonate complex supported by sterically demanding tris(tert-butoxy)siloxide ligands. The reaction of the potassium-bound UV imido complex, [U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4K] (4), with CS2 led to the isolation of perthiodicarbonate [K(18c6)]2[C2S6] (6), with concomitant formation of the UIV complex, [U{OSi(OtBu)3}4], and SCNAd. In contrast, the reaction of the UV imido complex, [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (5), with one or two equivalents of CS2 afforded the trithiocarbonate complex, [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U(CS3){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (7), which was isolated in 57% yield, with concomitant elimination of the admantyl thiocyanate product, SCNAd. Complex 7 is likely formed by fast nucleophilic addition of a UV terminal sulfide intermediate, resulting from the slow metathesis reaction of the imido complex with CS2, to a second CS2 molecule. The addition of a solution of H2S in thf (1.3 eq.) to 4 afforded the first isolable UV terminal sulfide complex, [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][US{OSi(OtBu)3}4] (8), in 41% yield. Based on DFT calculations, triple-bond character with a strong covalent interaction is suggested for the U–S bond in complex 7.
Different approaches have been used in order to prevent the formation of bridging species when preparing UIV mono-chalcogenide complexes by oxidation of UIII compounds.4b,c Recently, our group used sterically demanding tris(tert-butoxy)siloxide ligands to prevent the formation of a bridging chalcogenide complex. The reaction of the ate complex, [U(OSi(OtBu)3)4K], with the two-electron oxidising agent, Ph3PS, in the presence of 2.2.2-cryptand, led to the isolation of the terminal uranium(IV) monosulfide complex, [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][US(OSi(OtBu)3)4K].4e We note that all of the examples mentioned above resulted in the formation of a UIV mono-chalcogenide complex in spite of the fact that a two-electron oxidising agent was used in the sulfur–transfer reactions to UIII. This suggests that the isolation of terminal sulfides of UV or UVI from UIII might not be possible. A monosulfido complex of UIV was also prepared by deprotonation of a hydrosulfido analogue, [((Ad,MeArO)3tacn)U–SH] supported by a tripodal hexadentate aminophenolate ligand.4d The reported electrochemical studies indicated that this complex could be electrochemically oxidised, most likely to the UVS species, but preliminary attempts to chemically oxidise and isolate a UV sulfido complex were not successful.
Here we investigate new possible routes to isolate a UV terminal sulfide using tris(tert-butoxy)siloxide as the supporting ligands. This ligand previously allowed for the isolation and characterisation of the UV terminal oxo complex, [UO(OSi(OtBu)3)4K],8b and of the UV terminal imido complex, [K(18c6)][U(NAd)(OSi(OtBu)3)4] (1)15 (Ad = adamantyl) (see Fig. 1). Herein, we show that metathesis reactions of UV tetrasiloxide imido complexes with CS2 and H2S afford the first UV terminal sulfide and trithiocarbonate complexes.
Fig. 1 Molecular structures of the UV terminal oxo complex, [UO{OSi(OtBu)3}4K] (left), and the UV terminal imido complex, [K(18c6)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (1) (right). |
Thus, in our search for a UV terminal sulfide, we anticipated that UV terminal imido complexes would be the ideal starting materials. Notably, several examples of reactions of transition metal imido compounds with CS2 have been reported and they usually lead to the formation of sulfide and isothiocyanate products via a cycloaddition pathway.16 The formation of a UV terminal oxo complex from the reaction of a UV imido complex with CO2 has been reported,8a but a similar strategy using CS2 has never been used to prepare terminal uranium sulfides. Hydrosulfidolysis of imido compounds also represents a successful route to terminal or bridging sulfide complexes of d-block transition metals,17 but it has never been applied for f-elements.
We have previously shown that [K(18c6)][U{OSi(OtBu)3}4] can be used to effect a two-electron reduction of adamantyl azide, affording the UV monoimido complex [K(18c6)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (1).15 With regard to the important effect of alkali cations and crown-ether-bound alkali cations on the reactivity of uranium compounds supported by tris(tert-butoxy)siloxide ligands,8b,18 we have now prepared the analogous complexes, [U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4K] (4), and [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (5), by reduction of adamantyl azide with [U{OSi(OtBu)3}4K] (2) and [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U{OSi(OtBu)3}4] (3), respectively.
The charge-separated UIII tetrasiloxide precursor, [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U{OSi(OtBu)3}4] (3), is conveniently prepared in high yield by stirring the reported complex, [U{OSi(OtBu)3}4K] (2),8b with 2.2.2-cryptand in toluene. Complex 3 crystallised from a mixture of thf and hexane as two crystallographically unique pairs of [K(2.2.2-cryptand)]+ and [U{OSi(OtBu)3}4]− ions in the orthorhombic space group, P212121. The molecular structure is shown in Fig. 2. The four-coordinate uranium ions feature a tetrahedral coordination geometry formed by four monodentate tris(tert-butoxy)siloxide ligands. The structure is very similar to that of [K(18c6)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4] and the U–O bond lengths of the two complexes are comparable (U–Oave = 2.228 Å in [K(18c6)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4]; U–Oave = 2.21 Å in 3).
Treating complexes 2 and 3 with adamantyl azide in toluene yielded the UV imido complexes, [U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4K] (4), and [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (5), respectively (Scheme 1). Complex 4 is highly soluble in hexane, toluene and thf, whereas 5 is sparingly soluble in toluene but highly soluble in thf. The 1H NMR spectra of 4 and 5 in d8-toluene are similar to that of the reported complex 1,15 and show four paramagnetically shifted resonances attributable to the adamantyl protons, and one peak corresponding to the tert-butyl protons of the siloxide ligands. However, in the case of 5 the siloxide peak is sharp, while in the case of 4 a broad peak is observed, suggesting fluxional binding of the potassium ion in toluene solution for complex 4. Complex 5 shows three additional cryptand resonances in the 1H NMR spectrum.
Dark brown crystals of the heterobimetallic complex 4·tol crystallised from toluene in the orthorhombic space group, Fdd2. The molecular structure is shown in Fig. 3. The central uranium ion is five coordinate and it is ligated by four negatively charged oxygen atoms of the tris(tert-butoxy)siloxide ligands, and one nitrogen atom of the imido group. The U–N bond length (1.954(3) Å) is slightly longer than the corresponding bond length in [K(18c6)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (1.937(7) Å), while the average U–O bond lengths (2.20(2) Å for [K(18c6)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4] and 2.20(3) Å for 4) of the two complexes are about the same.15 The incorporation of the potassium ion into the structure of 4 results in significant distortion of the coordination geometry around the uranium ion relative to that found in 1. In 1, the coordination geometry of the uranium centre is roughly trigonal bipyramidal, with three siloxide ligands occupying the equatorial sites, and the axial sites being taken up by a siloxide ligand and an imido group, respectively. However, in 4, the coordination geometry around the uranium ion is highly distorted due to the coordination of three siloxide ligands to the six-coordinate potassium ion, which fits into a pocket formed by three κ2O–siloxide ligands.
At first, we investigated the reaction of [U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4K] (4) with 13CS2. An analogous approach has been used to prepare a uranium terminal oxo complex by reaction of a UV imido complex with CO2.8a The proposed mechanism for the formation of the terminal oxo involves a [2 + 2] cycloaddition reaction followed by extrusion of isocyanate to afford the terminal oxo complex.8a
In the present case, reactions between 4 and one or two equivalents of 13CS2 were slow. Monitoring the reactions by 1H NMR spectroscopy showed that in both cases consumption of the starting material took place over two to three days, and it proceeded with the concomitant formation of [U{OSi(OtBu)3}4] (in 35% yield) and additional unidentified uranium product(s). None of these products could be identified as a terminal sulfide, even when the 4:CS2 ratio was 1:1. The 13C NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixtures in d8-toluene show the presence of the metathesis by-product, the isothiocyanate SCNAd, in both cases, as well as an additional signal at 132 ppm assigned to the perthiodicarbonate C2S62−. The formation of an insoluble compound is also observed. The 13C NMR spectrum in d6-dmso of the residue obtained after removal of toluene form the reaction mixture shows the presence of peaks at 267 ppm and 129 ppm assigned to the CS32− and to the C2S62− species in a ratio of 1:1.2. Adding 18c6 to a 1:2 toluene reaction mixture of 4 and CS2 allowed for the crystallisation of the unusual CS3-coupling product, [K(18c6)]2[C2S6] (6) (Scheme 2). The molecular structure of 6 was determined by X-ray crystallography (see ESI†). Perthiodicarbonate species are rare but some examples are known, e.g. [PPh4]2[C2S6], which formed from aerial oxidation of a reaction mixture of PPh4Cl and K2(CS3).19
Complex 6 plausibly arises from uranium(V)-mediated oxidation of the trithiocarbonate in a putative [UV(CS3){OSi(OtBu)3}4K] intermediate. Such an intermediate is likely to be formed from the reaction of a UV terminal sulfide, formed from the metathesis of the imido group with a CS2 molecule, with a second CS2 molecule.
The presence of bound potassium ions incorporated into the structure of uranium siloxide complexes has been shown to have an important effect on the reactivity of UIII complexes with CS2, and on the stability of the resulting products with respect to trithiocarbonate or tetrathiooxalate ligand loss.18a Thus, we anticipated that the analogous reactions carried out with the UV imido complex 5, where the presence of 2.2.2-cryptand prevents cation binding to the siloxides, might enable us to stabilise the UV terminal sulfide and terminal trithiocarbonate intermediates.
Indeed, the reaction of 5 with two to five equivalents of CS2 in toluene afforded the trithiocarbonate complex [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U(CS3){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (7) in 57% yield (Scheme 3). The 1H NMR spectrum of 7 in d8-toluene exhibits two signals with equal integration ratios at 1.77 ppm and 1.51 ppm, respectively, corresponding to the tert-butoxy protons of the siloxide ligands, indicating a C2-symmetric species in solution. The 13C NMR spectrum of 7 in toluene shows a broad signal at 180 ppm that is assigned to the bound thiocarbonate ligand. In addition to this signal, the 13C NMR spectrum of the crude reaction mixture in d8-toluene showed the presence of the isothiocyanate product, SCNAd, a resonance at 132 ppm assigned to C2S62−, and a signal at 247 ppm (free CS32−). The 1H NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture also shows the presence of a signal assigned to [U{OSi(OtBu)3}4], but in a much smaller amount (8%) compared to what was found in the reaction of 4 with CS2.
Scheme 3 Syntheses of the terminal UV trithiocarbonate complex, [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U(CS3){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (7), and the terminal UV sulfide complex, [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][US{OSi(OtBu)3}4] (8). |
Dark brown crystals of complex 7·tol crystallised from toluene in the monoclinic space group, P21. The molecular structure is shown in Fig. 4 and selected bond lengths are summarised in Table 1. The six-coordinate uranium atom is coordinated by four siloxide oxygen atoms and two sulfur atoms of a terminally-bound κ2S–trithiocarbonate moiety, affording a distorted octahedral coordination geometry. The structure bears similarities to the recently reported terminal UIV thiocarbonate [U(TrenTIPS)(κ2-CS3)][K(B15C5)2]20 and to the related UIV trithiocarbonate complex, [{K(18c6)}2{μ3-κ2:κ2:κ2-CS3}{U(OSi(OtBu)3)4}].18a However, in the latter UIV complex, the 18c6-bound potassium cation is still able to bind two sulfur atoms of the thiocarbonate group. The average U–O bond length (2.10(3) Å) is noticeably shorter than the corresponding average bond lengths in the UV imido complexes, [K(18c6)][U(NSiMe3){OSi(OtBu)3}4] and [K(18c6)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (2.16(2) Å and 2.20(2) Å, respectively), and this is presumably a result of greater steric congestion in the two imido complexes, although electronic effects cannot be ruled out. The U–S bond lengths (2.747(3) Å and 2.772(3) Å) are shorter than those in the aforementioned terminal (2.8415(8) and 2.8520(10) Å)20 and K(18c6)+-capped UIV trithiocarbonate complex (2.9488(19) Å and 2.951(2) Å).18a In the case of the capped complex, the difference is greater than would be expected given the difference in ionic radii between UIV and UV (0.13 Å for six-coordinate ions),21 probably due to the electron-withdrawing effect of the two coordinated {K(18c6)}+ units in the UIV complex. The C–S bond lengths (1.679(13) Å, 1.696(12) Å and 1.749(14) Å) show similar values (within error) as previously observed for the related UIV trithiocarbonate complex, [{K(18c6)]}2{κ2-CS3}{U(OSi(OtBu)3)4}] (1.723(8), 1.711(10) and 1.704(8) Å),18a in agreement with charge delocalisation over the CS32− unit.
Structural parameters | 7·tol | 8·1.5tol |
---|---|---|
U1–S1 | 2.772(3) | 2.376(5) |
U1–S2 | 2.747(3) | — |
U1–Oave | 2.14(3) | 2.10(3) |
C73–Srange | 1.68(1)–1.75(1) | — |
Complex 7 is the first example of a UV uranium trithiocarbonate complex and is only the second example of a terminal trithiocarbonate complex in f element chemistry.20 Complex 7 shows higher stability than a putative trithiocarbonate intermediate formed in the reaction of the K+ (4) UV imido complex with CS2. This is probably explained by the fact that in the absence of K+ cations binding the trithiocarbonate group, oxidation of the trithiocarbonate by UV is not a favoured pathway. Complex 7 is likely formed by the nucleophilic addition of a UV terminal sulfide intermediate to a CS2 molecule (Scheme 4). Fast addition of terminal and bridging UIV sulfide to CS2 to afford terminal or bridging UIV thiocarbonate complexes has been previously reported.4e,22
Monitoring the reaction between equimolar amounts of complex 5 and 13CS2 by 1H NMR spectroscopy showed a very slow reaction, due in part to the very low solubility of 5 in toluene, and after ten days, complex 7 and unreacted complex 4 were present in equimolar quantities. There is no evidence of the formation of the UV terminal sulfide intermediate under these conditions, probably due to its fast reaction with an additional CS2 molecule.
We reasoned that using a less bulky imido complex might increase the rate of the first step of the reaction, thereby allowing for the isolation of a terminal sulfide complex, but NMR-scale reactions between [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U(NSiMe3){OSi(OtBu)3}4] and two equivalents of 13CS2 showed that this strategy was unsuitable (see ESI†). The reaction was slow, and although multiple products were formed, it was possible to identify complex 7 in the reaction mixture by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The presence of a terminal sulfide was not detected.
These results show that although the metathesis reaction of the UV imido complex with CS2 leads to a terminal UV sulfido complex, the reaction is rather slow and the plausible UV terminal sulfide intermediate cannot be isolated due to its rapid reaction with another molecule of CS2 to afford the trithiocarbonate complex. In an analogous approach, we anticipated that the high basicity of the imido group could be exploited in an acid/base metathesis reaction with H2S to afford a terminal sulfide product. Indeed, treating a pre-chilled (−40 °C) suspension of [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (4) in toluene with a fresh, commercially available 0.8 M solution of H2S in thf (1.3 eq.) afforded the first isolable UV terminal sulfide complex, [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][US{OSi(OtBu)3}4] (8) (Scheme 3) in 41% yield. Some unidentified side products also formed in the reaction, but a 1H NMR spectroscopy experiment using naphthalene as an internal standard showed that the conversion rate to the terminal sulfide product was 76%. The 1H NMR spectrum of 8 in d8-toluene only shows one broad resonance at 1.20 ppm that corresponds to the tert-butoxy protons of the siloxde ligands, along with three signals for the cryptand protons. The fact that only one signal is observed for the siloxide protons suggests that the structure of 8 is fluxional in solution. Complex 8 is reasonably thermally stable and it only showed minor decomposition in solution over the course of a week at room temperature. The formation of the terminal sulfide is likely to involve a double H-atom transfer from the H2S to the imido nitrogen. No intermediate reaction product was observed by NMR spectroscopy, suggesting that if the plausible uranium amide/hydrosulfide intermediate is formed (as previously proposed in the hydrosulfidolysis of titanium imido complexes), then the H-transfer from the bound SH to the resulting amido group is fast.17b,c
Dark brown crystals of complex 8·1.5tol crystallised from toluene as two crystallographically independent units. The molecular structure is shown in Fig. 5 and selected bond lengths are listed in Table 1. The uranium atoms in each molecule are ligated by one terminally bound sulfide atom and the negatively charged oxygen atoms of four siloxide ligands, resulting in a distorted trigonal bipyramidal coordination geometry. The U–S bond lengths of the two independent molecules are 2.376(5) Å and 2.396(5) Å, respectively, which are considerably shorter than the corresponding bond length in the UIV analogue, [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][US(OSi(OtBu)3)4K] (2.5220(14) Å).4e However, this difference is about what would be expected after accounting for the difference in ionic radii between UIV and UV (0.13 Å).21 The predicted values for the U–S double and triple bonds according to Pyykkö are significantly shorter (respectively 2.28 Å and 2.13 Å).23 A similar discrepancy between the Pyykkö values and experimental values was also observed for a triply bonded terminal U(VI) sulfide (US = 2.39 Å in the OUS2+ fragment).6 The average U–O bond lengths (2.14(3) Å for molecule 1 and 2.13(4) Å for molecule 2, respectively) are longer than the corresponding average bond length in complex 7. Given that a sulfide ligand is considerably less bulky than a trithiocarbonate moiety, this difference can probably be ascribed primarily to electronic effects. The Vis/NIR spectrum of 8 in toluene (see ESI†) shows only the presence of four low intensity signals in the 1000–2000 nm region, as found in other UV complexes.8a,b,10c
A 1H NMR experiment showed that complex 7 reacted immediately with 1 equiv. of 13CS2 in d8-toluene to yield 8 as the only product. This result supports the possibility of 7 as an intermediate in the formation of 8 from 5.
The X-band EPR spectra of 7 and 8 were measured in a toluene/acetonitrile glass (see ESI†). While no signal was detected at room temperature, an EPR signal, featuring broad linewidths (600 to 800 mT), that unambiguously originates from a metal-centred unpaired electron was observed at 10 K for both complexes. In both cases, the EPR signal was fitted with a rhombic set of g-values (g1 = 1.25; g2 = 1.03; g3 = 0.72 for 7 and g1 = 1.38; g2 = 1.24; g3 < 0.6 for 8) that are comparable to those reported for the octahedral uranium(V) complex, [UO(OSi(OtBu)3)4K] (g1 = 1.248; g2 = 0.856; g3 = 0.485).8b
On the other hand, the WBI are 0.72/0.75, intermediate between the values found for 7 and the UIV compound, in line with an influence of the potassium on the covalency. Indeed, the presence of the interaction between the potassium and the trithiocarbonate decreases the covalency in the U–S bond, mainly because the atomic orbitals of sulfur need to overlap with both U and K. Using similar methods, we analysed the bonding in complex 8 and compared it with the bonding found in its UIV analogue.4e Molecular orbital analysis (Fig. 7) clearly indicates a triple bond that is similar to that observed for the UIV analogue. The HOMO-3 is the σ bond, whereas HOMO-1 and HOMO are the two π orbitals. Natural Bonding Orbital (NBO) analysis is in line with this bonding description. Indeed, at the first order, three bonding orbitals (1σ and 2π) are found and they are strongly polarised towards S (77%, 80% and 81% for the σ orbital and the two π orbitals, respectively). Finally, the Wiberg Bond Index (WBI) is 2.2, in line with a triple bond with very strong covalent character. This is very close to the value of 2.25 that was found for the UIV analogue, indicating that oxidation of the UIV complex does not affect the bonding but only removes an electron from one of the 5f orbitals that becomes the LUMO of the UV system (Fig. 7).
Synthetic details for the preparation of [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U{OSi(OtBu)3}4] (3), [U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4K] (4), and [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][U(NAd){OSi(OtBu)3}4] (5) are given in the ESI.†
Bragg-intensities of 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 were measured at low temperature [100 K and 140 K (compound 8)], respectively using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54184 Å) on a Rigaku SuperNova dual system diffractometer equipped with an Atlas CCD detector for compound 3 and 7 and equipped with an Atlas S2 CCD detector for compound 4, 6 and 8. The datasets were reduced and then corrected for absorption with CrysAlisPro.25
The solutions and refinements for the structures were performed by SHELXT26 and SHELXL-2016 (release 6),26 respectively. In the case of 7, the solution and refinement for the structure were performed by SHELX-97.27 The crystal structures were refined using full-matrix least-squares based on F2 with all non-hydrogen atoms anisotropically defined. The hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions by means of the “riding” model.
In the case of 4, the structure contained half of a toluene molecule in the asymmetric unit and it was disordered along a two-fold axis. The atoms were refined anisotropically and in order to have a convergent least-squares refinement, distance and similarity restraints (SADI, SIMU, ISOR and FLAT) were applied.
In the case of 6, the structure was refined as a two-component twin with HKLF 5 file obtained by treating the data with CrysAlisPro25 yielding to the value of 0.432(2) for the BASF parameter. One 18c6 is disordered over two positions. The atoms of each orientation were located in difference Fourier map. The major and minor parts were refined anisotropically, but distance and similarity restraints (DFIX, SADI, ISOR and SIMU) were used for a convergent least-squares refinement, yielding to site occupancy ratios of 0.511(5)/0.489(5). The second 18c6 was just partially disordered over two positions but treated in the same way yielding to site occupancy ratios of 0.64(1)/0.36(1).
In compound 7, light atoms (C and O) showed unstable anisotropic behaviour and restraints (SIMU 0.02 card) were necessary to handle them.
In the case of 8, the structure was refined as a two-component twin crystal and data (in HKLF 5 format) were obtained by treating the data with CrysAlisPro25 yielding to the value of 0.448(1) for the BASF parameter. The structure included one molecule of toluene in the asymmetric unit, it was disordered over an inversion centre and refined in a ‘PART-1’ environment. The atoms were refined anisotropically, but distance and similarity restraints (DFIX and SIMU) were employed for a stable least-squares refinement.
A conversion experiment using naphthalene as an internal standard determined the conversion of 4 to 8 to be 76% by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
A conversion experiment using naphthalene as an internal standard determined the conversion of 4 into [U{OSi(OtBu)3}4] to be 35% by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
Finally, the GAUSSIAN09 program suite was used in all calculations.38
DFT calculations were performed to investigate the nature of the U–S bond in complexes 7 and 8, and the results were compared with the analyses of the analogous UIV complexes. Based on this analysis, triple-bond character with strong covalent character is suggested for the U–S bond in the terminal uranium(V) sulfide 8, in line with previous studies on terminal UIV sulfides. Single-bond character was found for the U–S bond in complex 7, which turned out to be more covalent than in the UIV analogue.
In conclusion, we have shown that the metathesis of UV imido complexes with CS2 or H2S provides a convenient route to terminal sulfides. However, the metathesis reaction with CS2 was very slow and resulted in nucleophilic addition of the putative sulfide intermediate to CS2. Moreover, the presence of siloxide-bound cations in the UV imido precursor resulted in the isolation of a side-reaction product, the perthiodicarbonate, salt [K(18c6)]2[C2S6], resulting from the oxidation of CS32− by UV.
In contrast, the metathesis of UV with H2S readily forms a stable terminal UV sulfide. The hydrosulfidolysis of uranium imides reported here provide a versatile route to uranium terminal chalcogenides that should be easily extended to other uranium oxidation states and to other chalcogenides. Work in this direction is in progress.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Full computational and experimental details, NMR spectra, and detailed X-ray crystallographic data in CIF format. CCDC 1535285–1535289. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c7sc01111c |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 |