Industrial Operationalisation of Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design from Business Case to Launch

Abstract

The chemical industry stands at a pivotal crossroads in the global transition towards sustainability. While chemical industry creates essential innovations, it has high environmental impact, and must reimagine its operations, products, and value chains to meet the demands of a rapidly evolving regulatory and societal landscape. The Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD) framework, especially in its latest revision, nudges chemical industry towards the embedding of sustainability and safety in innovation processes and facilitate having bridges between safety and sustainability experts. The SSbD approach supports the deployment of EU policies such as the Competitive Compass, The Green Deal and the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. While JRC has coined the term “SSbD framework”, the underlying principles are not new—the framework adds more rigor to practices that industry has long implemented through PSA and other risk-based methodologies. Yet, translating these principles into consistent practice across the sector remains a challenge. The practical implementation of SSbD principles remains uneven, with significant variation in how companies cover and operationalise SSbD criteria. Here, we compare industrial practices across the chemical sector, including specialty chemicals, consumer products, and materials manufacturing, focusing on their internal guidelines and reporting structures to assess how SSbD approach is integrated, aligned with, or differs from these practices. These industrial practices offer valuable lessons in integrating sustainability into business strategy, managing trade-offs, and aligning current or future market and regulatory expectations. At the same time, we identify key gaps in existing SSbD approach, including the inconclusive integration of social dimensions, and a lack of practical tools for early-stage decision-making. We argue that a highly iterative, industry-informed SSbD guidance—grounded in real-world constraints and opportunities—is essential to accelerate adoption and impact of the upcoming revised SSbD framework. By bridging policy ambition and industrial reality, this article contributes to the ongoing enforcement of safe and sustainable criteria in research and development processes.

Article information

Article type
Perspective
Submitted
13 Aug 2025
Accepted
16 Feb 2026
First published
06 Mar 2026
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY-NC license

RSC Sustainability, 2026, Accepted Manuscript

Industrial Operationalisation of Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design from Business Case to Launch

A. Ay, R. Chinchilla, T. Moss, J. Munsch, C. Colin, C. Caldeira, P. Dufils, T. Melchin, E. Hahn and W. Wohlleben, RSC Sustainability, 2026, Accepted Manuscript , DOI: 10.1039/D5SU00666J

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications, without requesting further permission from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.

To request permission to reproduce material from this article in a commercial publication, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party commercial publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements