Potential human health effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) prevalent in aquatic environment: a review

Abstract

The widespread incorporation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in various daily-use items has garnered considerable attention regarding environmental and health hazards in the last decade. Among different categories of PFAS, a paradigm shift has occurred towards short-chain PFAS alternatives like GenX, ADONA, and F53B, driven by environmental considerations and regulatory changes. Exposure to PFAS can happen through consuming contaminated food and drink, inhaling contaminated dust, or skin contact with PFAS-containing objects. Furthermore, occupational exposure might result from manufacturing and firefighting operations employing fluorinated compounds. In humans and monkeys, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) exhibit an increased affinity for plasma proteins. However, the exact extent of this affinity is still a matter of research. The buildup of PFOS in the liver might cause injury or dysfunction by interfering with its regular operation. Compared to other human tissues, the liver has been shown to accumulate higher amounts of PFOS. Although there is an absence of epidemiological studies on PFOS, a possible connection between the health disorder and elevated cholesterol levels has been established by many researchers. Considering the transition as a future environmental burden, this review aims to bring together ongoing research compilations on short-chain PFAS, delving into their persistence, prevalence, and bioaccumulative toxicity in aquatic environments and focusing on critical areas of research gaps. An extensive literature analysis assessed the relative abundance of short-chain compounds compared to their long-chain counterparts within aquatic ecosystems. US EPA has setup new guidelines specifically for drinking water for PFOA and PFOS compounds which is 4 ppt. Furthermore, this review highlights emerging regulatory measures being implemented worldwide to safeguard public health. These measures encompass a range of strategies, from the European Union's emphasis on banning certain manufacturing and production practices under the REACH regulations to establishing exposure limits and disposal protocols in the United States.

Graphical abstract: Potential human health effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) prevalent in aquatic environment: a review

Supplementary files

Transparent peer review

To support increased transparency, we offer authors the option to publish the peer review history alongside their article.

View this article’s peer review history

Article information

Article type
Critical Review
Submitted
03 Dec 2024
Accepted
05 Sep 2025
First published
24 Sep 2025
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Environ. Sci.: Adv., 2025, Advance Article

Potential human health effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) prevalent in aquatic environment: a review

S. Mayilswami, N. P. Raval, R. Tomar, S. Sharma, S. M. Praveena, N. Kataria, R. Selvasembian, S. R. Shanmugam, R. Nath, A. Malakar, S. Dutta and S. Mukherjee, Environ. Sci.: Adv., 2025, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D4VA00405A

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements