Issue 11, 2018

Emission of formic and acetic acids from two Colorado soils

Abstract

A ‘missing source’ of atmospheric formic acid is consistently observed during model-measurement comparisons, and evidence from multiple environments suggests a near-surface source. Soil emissions are considered to be a small formic acid source, but estimates are based on a single study from a tropical site. Here, we investigate soil emissions of organic acids from two soils – a ponderosa pine forest (Manitou Experimental Forest Observatory), and a managed lawn (Colorado State University) using a laboratory chamber. Both soils are a source of formic and acetic acids. Under ambient conditions, formic acid emissions are 0.11 (pine forest) and 0.15 (lawn) nmol m−2 s−1, and acetic acid emissions are 0.05 (pine forest) and 0.71 (lawn) nmol m−2 s−1. Only acetic acid emissions from the forest site correlate with CO2 fluxes, but all formic and acetic acid emissions increase exponentially with temperature. Increasing soil moisture only enhances acetic acid emissions from the forest. Considering this temperature and moisture dependence, we hypothesize that while equilibrium partitioning may contribute to the forest emissions, organic acid emissions from the lawn are likely driven by microbial activity. Lactic acid was emitted from both soils, but not quantified. The observed formic acid emissions are higher than previous measurements, but still low enough that soils are unlikely the ‘missing source’ of atmospheric organic acids, although the variability in the soil source is substantial. We contrast observations to previous parameterizations used in models, and present recommendations for modified parameterizations for formic and acetic acid emission.

Graphical abstract: Emission of formic and acetic acids from two Colorado soils

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
07 Aug. 2018
Accepted
24 Sept. 2018
First published
25 Sept. 2018

Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2018,20, 1537-1545

Emission of formic and acetic acids from two Colorado soils

A. Mielnik, M. Link, J. Mattila, S. R. Fulgham and D. K. Farmer, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2018, 20, 1537 DOI: 10.1039/C8EM00356D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements