Issue 46, 2017

C–H nickellation of phenol-derived phosphinites: regioselectivity and structures of cyclonickellated complexes

Abstract

This report describes the results of a study on the ortho-C–H nickellation of the aryl phosphinites i-Pr2P(OAr) derived from the following four groups of substituted phenols: 3-R-C6H4OH (R = F (b), Me (c), MeO (d), Cl (e)); 3,5-R2-C6H3OH (R = F (f), Me (g), Cl (h), OMe (i)); 2-R-C6H4OH (R = Me (j), Ph(k)); and 2,6-R2-C6H3OH (R = Me (l), Ph (m)). No nickellation was observed with the phosphinites derived from the 3,5-disubstituted phenols g and h, and the 2,6-disubstituted phenols l and m; in all other cases nickellation occurred at an ortho-C–H to generate either the Br-bridged dimers [{κPC-(i-Pr)2POAr}Ni(μ-Br)]2 (1b–1f, 1j, and 1k) or the monomeric acetonitrile adduct {κPC-ArOP(i-Pr)2}Ni(Br)(NCMe) (1i-NCMe). Analysis of C–H nickellation regioselectivity with 3-R-C6H4OH pointed to the importance of substituent sterics, not electronics: nickellation occurred at the least hindered position either exclusively (for R = Me (c), MeO(d), and Cl (e)) or predominantly (for R = F (b); 6 : 1). This conclusion is also consistent with the observation that C–H nickellation is possible with the 3,5-disubstituted aryl phosphinites bearing F and OMe, but not with the more bulky substituents Me or Cl. For the 2-substituted aryl phosphinites, C–H nickellation occurs at the unsubstituted ortho-C–H and not on the R substituent, regardless of whether the alternative C–H moiety of the substituent is sp3 (R = Me (j)) or sp2 (R = Ph (k)). The system thus reveals a strong preference for formation of 5-membered metallacycles. Consistent with this reactivity, no nickellation occurs with (2,6-R2-C6H3O)P(i-Pr)2. Tests with the parent dimer derived from i-Pr2P(OPh) showed that conversion to the monomeric acetonitrile adduct is highly favored, going to completion with only a small excess of MeCN. All new cyclonickellated complexes reported in this study were fully characterized, including by single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. The solid state structures of the dimers 1b and 1d showed an unexpected feature: two halves of the dimers displayed non-coplanar conformations that place the two Ni(II) centers at shortened distances from each other (2.94–3.16 Å). Geometry optimization studies using DFT have shown that such non-coplanar conformations stabilize the complex, implying that the “bending” observed in these complexes is not caused by packing forces. Indeed, it appears that the occurrence of coplanar conformations in the solid state structures of these dimers is a simple consequence of packing forces rather than an intrinsic property of the compound.

Graphical abstract: C–H nickellation of phenol-derived phosphinites: regioselectivity and structures of cyclonickellated complexes

Associated articles

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
12 Sept. 2017
Accepted
02 Nov. 2017
First published
02 Nov. 2017

Dalton Trans., 2017,46, 16159-16170

C–H nickellation of phenol-derived phosphinites: regioselectivity and structures of cyclonickellated complexes

L. P. Mangin and D. Zargarian, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46, 16159 DOI: 10.1039/C7DT03403B

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements