Issue 4, 2016

The comparison between reproducibility standard deviations from collaborative trials and proficiency tests: a preliminary study from food analysis

Abstract

Reproducibility conditions of the replication of a measurement include several circumstances. In chemical measurement ‘reproducibility’ is mostly taken to refer to an interlaboratory study, either a collaborative trial (that is, with a strictly defined analytical procedure) or a proficiency test (with no prescribed procedure). At first sight, we might expect the reproducibility standard deviation of the proficiency test to be the greater for the same determination: the various procedures used by the participants will each introduce an extra uncertainty related to their specific biases. No comprehensive study of this potential disparity has been undertaken hitherto. The issue is important because reproducibility standard deviation is closely related to standard uncertainty. Here a comparison is made between the trend of collaborative trial outcomes (standard deviation as a function of concentration) and individual values from the FAPAS proficiency testing scheme in the food analysis sector. Contrary to expectations, the general tendency is for proficiency tests to provide slightly smaller standard deviations than do collaborative trials at mass fractions of the analyte greater than 10−7, and slightly higher at lower concentrations. However, there is considerable variation around the median level of the ratio at all mass fractions.

Graphical abstract: The comparison between reproducibility standard deviations from collaborative trials and proficiency tests: a preliminary study from food analysis

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
02 Nov. 2015
Accepted
02 Dec. 2015
First published
17 Dec. 2015

Anal. Methods, 2016,8, 742-746

Author version available

The comparison between reproducibility standard deviations from collaborative trials and proficiency tests: a preliminary study from food analysis

M. Thompson, Anal. Methods, 2016, 8, 742 DOI: 10.1039/C5AY02890F

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements