Issue 10, 2020

Emerging investigator series: onsite recycling of saline–alkaline soil washing water by forward osmosis: techno-economic evaluation and implication

Abstract

This study investigated the techno-economic feasibility of forward osmosis (FO) for onsite recycling of saline–alkaline soil washing water with an all-purpose liquid fertiliser as a draw solution. Commercially available polyamide thin-film composite and aquaporin FO membranes (denoted HTI and AQP membranes, respectively) were compared under different operating conditions. Results showed that the incorporation of aquaporin vesicles offered the AQP membrane better transport properties (i.e. higher water permeability and lower salt permeability) than the HTI membrane. Thus, the AQP membrane exhibited a much higher water flux and lower reverse solute flux than the HTI membrane in response to either an increase in operating temperature or draw solution concentration. In particular, the water flux of the AQP membrane enhanced from 20.2 to 42.4 L m−2 h−1 with a temperature increase from 25 to 40 °C. Although over 85% water recovery with effective retention of dissolved inorganic salts could be achieved by both FO membranes in concentration of saline–alkaline soil washing water, the AQP membrane was more techno-economically feasible in practice, mainly due to its higher water flux and lower capital and operational expenses. Nevertheless, the economic favourability of the AQP membrane (i.e. the total water cost) over the HTI membrane was largely determined by its membrane element cost.

Graphical abstract: Emerging investigator series: onsite recycling of saline–alkaline soil washing water by forward osmosis: techno-economic evaluation and implication

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
21 Maijs 2020
Accepted
06 Aug. 2020
First published
08 Aug. 2020

Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2020,6, 2881-2890

Emerging investigator series: onsite recycling of saline–alkaline soil washing water by forward osmosis: techno-economic evaluation and implication

Z. Xu, M. Xie, J. E. Kim, N. Huda, Z. Gao, G. Li and W. Luo, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2020, 6, 2881 DOI: 10.1039/D0EW00490A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements