Hua
Liu
a,
Wen-Wen
Yi
*b,
Quan-Quan
Li
*c and
Shu-Ya
Zhao
d
aCollege of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi Province, China
bSchool of Environment and Resources, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi Province, China. E-mail: 18404984125@163.com
cCollege of New Energy, Yulin University, Yulin 719000, Shaanxi Province, China. E-mail: liquanquan@163.com
dCollege of Chemistry & Materials Science, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, People's Republic of China
First published on 26th July 2024
The utilization of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in photochemical synthesis has garnered significant attention owing to their exceptional oxidative capacity under mild conditions. Recently, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been employed to convert molecular oxygen (O2) to ROS for photocatalysis. However, visible-light-active MOFs for effective oxygen activation remain scarce. Herein, a simple and effective strategy, linker functionalization, is utilized to immobilize the benzothiadiazole unit inside the UiO-68-type MOF (UiO-68-BTDB). The MOF was applied as the first example generating superoxide radical anions (O2˙−) and singlet oxygen (1O2) for access to benzimidazoles and benzothiazoles in air at room temperature. Recycling experiments were performed to confirm the stability and reusability of UiO-68-BTDB as a robust heterogeneous catalyst.
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have garnered significant attention in the applications of photochemical synthesis for their highly crystalline porous structure and tunability in chemical functionality.13–15 For visible-light-driven ROS generation, many predesigned organic and metal–organic chromophores are employed as linkers and integrated into MOFs, which is highly helpful to enhance the concentration of photocatalytic sites and avoid their self-quenching within the framework.16–18 Furthermore, the porous nature of MOFs facilitates the transport and diffusion of ROS, thus enhancing their further interaction with incoming reactants.19–21 On the other hand, the heterogeneous nature of MOF catalysts confers them with easy separation, enhanced stability, and reusability.
Among various photosensitive compounds, it is well known that benzothiadiazoles with bicyclic electron-deficient skeletons exhibit unique photoelectric properties.22,23 Specifically, benzothiadiazoles have always served as highly efficient ROS photocatalysts because of their easily improved charge transfer efficiency by designing donor–acceptor–donor (D–A–D) type photosensitizers.24–26 For example, a series of benzothiadiazole-containing linkers were introduced into the MOF frameworks by the Li group, and the obtained JNU series of MOFs showed photocatalytic activity for aerobic oxidation. Therefore, immobilizing benzothiadiazole units into MOFs may be an effective strategy to convert O2 to ROS for photocatalytic reactions and is desirable.
Bearing these considerations in mind, 4,4′-(benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-4,7-diyl)dibenzoic acid (H2BTDB) was selected as the light-harvester and organic ligand to build a visible-light-active MOF, UiO-68-BTDB. Due to the well-isolated benzothiadiazole chromophore in the framework, the MOF not only retained the visible light absorption of H2BTDB, but also produced both singlet oxygen (1O2) and superoxide radical anions (O2˙−). UiO-68-BTDB can also be used as a photocatalyst for the photochemical synthesis of benzimidazoles and benzothiazoles. By combining the generation of 1O2 and O2˙−, UiO-68-BTDB exhibits excellent photocatalytic activity in the visible-light-induced condensation cyclization reaction to synthesize benzimidazoles and benzothiazoles.
The optical and electrical properties were next investigated. As shown in Fig. S6,† UiO-68-BTDB gives emission at 510 nm, and this emission band was ascribed to the π–π* transition of the organic ligand in UiO-68-BTDB. To assess the visible light absorption capacity, the UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectrum was obtained. As shown in Fig. 1c, UiO-68-BTDB displayed a broad absorption ranging from 200 to 600 nm. The optical band gap (Eg) of UiO-68-BTDB was calculated to be about 2.55 eV by the Kubelka–Munk (KM) method from Tauc plots (Fig. 1c, inset). To evaluate the conduction band (CB) and the valence band (VB) levels, Mott–Schottky measurements were conducted at frequencies of 500, 750, and 1000 Hz. As shown in Fig. 1d, the CB position was determined to be −0.87 V vs. NHE for UiO-68-BTDB. The VB was thus estimated to be 1.68 V vs. NHE. Overall, UiO-68-BTDB has a more negative potential (−0.87 V vs. NHE) than that for the reduction of O2 to the superoxide radical (−0.33 V vs. NHE), indicating that the MOF catalyst may initiate superoxide radical anion (O2˙−) generation.
To further evaluate the photoelectric properties of the prepared MOF, we explored the charge separation capacity through photocurrent response analysis and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). As shown in Fig. 1e, UiO-68-BTDB showed significantly higher photocurrent than the H2BTDB linker, indicative of effective separation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs. Furthermore, this result was further proved by its relatively smaller radii and lower resistance for charge transfer (Fig. S7†), suggesting that introducing the benzothiadiazole photosensitizer into the MOF is beneficial for the charge separation efficiency. In addition, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) tests were performed to investigate its capacity to generate ROS upon visible-light irradiation. As shown in Fig. 2a, in the presence of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinooxy (TEMP), the EPR signals observed confirmed the generation of singlet oxygen (1O2). Furthermore, the formation of superoxide radical anions (O2˙−) was also indicated by adding 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) in the EPR experiments (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2 (a) EPR detection of 1O2 generation with UiO-68-BTDB trapped by TEMP. (b) EPR detection of O2˙− generation with UiO-68-BTDB trapped by DMPO. |
Among heteroaromatic compounds, benzimidazole and benzothiazole derivatives demonstrate potential applications in the pharmaceutical industry and materials science.30–32 Various approaches have been devoted to synthesize benzimidazoles and benzothiazoles.32–36 Among them, O2-involved oxidation under visible light excitation is considered as a promising one owing to its effective and ecofriendly approach. In terms of the capability of generating 1O2 and O2˙− of UiO-68-BTDB, we envisioned that photocatalytic condensation cyclization to synthesize benzimidazole and benzothiazole would occur with UiO-68-BTDB as the photocatalyst. As shown in Table 1 (entry 1), the condensation cyclization of o-phenylenediamine with benzaldehyde can be achieved in 94% isolated yield with 1 mol% UiO-68-BTDB as the photocatalyst in EtOH and a 10 W blue LED as the light source. Control experiments demonstrated that no product was obtained in the absence of UiO-68-BTDB, a light source, or air (Fig. 3, and Table 1, entries 2–4), indicating the necessity of these reaction parameters. Solvent effects were examined, indicating that EtOH is beneficial for obtaining a high yield of the target product (entries 5–9). Finally, with 1 mol% of UiO-68-BTDB photocatalyst, the substrates could be efficiently converted to the target product with the highest yield (entries 10–12). Moreover, ligands without a benzothiadiazole unit were also chosen for comparison (Fig. S8†). The obtained UiO-68 was employed as a photocatalyst under similar conditions, and no product was observed (entry 13). A comparison of UiO-68-BTDB with common photocatalysts further demonstrates the superior photocatalytic performance of UiO-68-BTDB (Table S1†).
Entry | Catalyst | Solvent | Amount (mol%) | Yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
a o-Phenylenediamine (0.2 mmol), benzaldehyde (0.2 mmol), room temperature, a 10 W blue LED, open to air, 3 h. b Isolated yields. c Conditions in the absence of light. d Conditions in the absence of air. | ||||
1 | UiO-68-BTDB | EtOH | 1.0 | 94 |
2 | — | EtOH | 1.0 | Trace |
3c | UiO-68-BTDB | EtOH | 1.0 | Trace |
4d | UiO-68-BTDB | EtOH | 1.0 | Trace |
5 | UiO-68-BTDB | DMF | 1.0 | 26 |
6 | UiO-68-BTDB | MeOH | 1.0 | 88 |
7 | UiO-68-BTDB | MeCN | 1.0 | 45 |
8 | UiO-68-BTDB | DCM | 1.0 | Trace |
9 | UiO-68-BTDB | THF | 1.0 | 63 |
10 | UiO-68-BTDB | EtOH | 0.5 | 82 |
11 | UiO-68-BTDB | EtOH | 1.5 | 92 |
12 | UiO-68-BTDB | EtOH | 2.0 | 81 |
13 | UiO-68 | EtOH | 1.0 | Trace |
Under the standard reaction conditions, the substrate scope of aromatic aldehydes was studied to explore the general capability of UiO-68-BTDB as a photocatalyst for the above condensation cyclization reaction. As shown in Table 2, a variety of aromatic aldehydes (with either electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups) with o-phenylenediamine proceeded and afforded the corresponding benzimidazoles with satisfactory yields. It was noted that higher yields of benzimidazole were observed with para-substituted benzaldehyde with electron-donating groups (–CH3 and –OCH3) compared to those with electron-withdrawing groups (–NO2), demonstrating the significant electronic effect on the reaction.
To investigate the versatility of this method for access to 2-substituted benzothiazole, numerous para-substituted benzaldehydes were reacted with o-aminothiophenol under the standard conditions to obtain benzothiazoles. As can be seen from Table 3, most substrates gave excellent yields of the target products for only 1.5 h. Overall, the above results showed that UiO-68-BTDB is a general photocatalyst for the synthesis of benzimidazoles and benzothiazoles upon visible light irradiation.
To confirm the heterogeneous nature of UiO-68-BTDB, a series of related experiments were then carried out. As shown in Fig. S9,† the filter experiment showed that the yield of 3a is unchanged in the next 2 h after removing the catalyst and reacting for 1.5 h. No obvious BTDB2− signal in the filtrate was observed in UV-vis spectra, indicating the stability and heterogeneity of UiO-68-BTDB. Additionally, the PXRD pattern of the recovered UiO-68-BTDB after five runs is well consistent with the fresh samples, indicating that it can be recycled for at least five runs without much loss of catalytic efficiency (Fig. S10†). These results commendably demonstrated the heterogeneous nature of UiO-68-BTDB in the photocatalytic condensation cyclization to prepare benzimidazoles and benzothiazoles.
The identification of ROS generated under photocatalytic conditions is essential for elucidating the reaction mechanism of the condensation cyclization. Thus, the ROS quenching tests were further conducted. As shown in Fig. 3 and Table S2,† when the radical scavenger 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyl-1-oxide (TEMPO) was added to the reaction system, the yield of 3a decreased significantly to 16%, confirming the radical reaction process. The addition of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) had a very little effect on the yield, thus ruling out the presence of ˙OH. After adding NaN3, a typical scavenger for 1O2, the reaction yield (26%) was dramatically decreased. The quenched yield (23%) was observed with the addition of the O2˙− scavenger p-benzoquinone (BQ). Furthermore, the reaction was greatly inhibited when the hole (h+) scavenger C2O4(NH4)2 or electron (e−) scavenger AgNO3 was added. These results suggested that h+ and e− both play a key role during the photocatalysis, and the major working oxygen species here might be 1O2 and O2˙−. Overall, it can be deduced that the reaction involves two pathways of energy transfer and electron transfer.
According to the above pieces of evidence and literature reports,32,33 a tentative reaction mechanism for the condensation cyclization to benzimidazole and benzothiazole was proposed. Initially, o-phenylenediamine/o-aminothiophenol and benzaldehyde are dehydrated to form intermediate I, electrons are excited, and charge carriers are separated on UiO-68-BTDB upon visible-light irradiation. Next, as shown in Fig. 4, the generated holes and electrons could initiate the following reactions: holes (Ev = 1.68 V) could capture an electron from intermediate I (E(I/II) = 0.45 V)37 and afford II, which then dissociates a proton to give free radical intermediate III. The intermediate III undergoes cyclization and then reduced by photogenerated electrons to produce IV. At the same time, partial singlet electrons transformed into excited triplet electrons via intersystem crossing (ISC),38 thus producing 1O2 through energy transfer (ET).39 Aminal V, which has gained a proton from intermediate IV, further reacts with 1O2 to afford intermediate VI. After releasing hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), the target product is afforded. On the other hand, the photogenerated holes of UiO-68-BTDB oxidize intermediate I and further cyclize to intermediate II′. Meanwhile, the photogenerated electron converts O2 into O2˙−via a single electron transfer (SET) mechanism.40 The target product is afforded by deprotonation of II′ by O2˙− and hydrogen abstraction by hydroperoxyl radicals from intermediate III′.
Fig. 4 Plausible mechanism of UiO-68-BTDB catalyzed the condensation cyclization reaction to synthesize benzimidazoles and benzothiazoles. |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures, crystallographic data and other photocatalytic details. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4qi01368a |
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2024 |