A comparative study of nickel–silica catalyst architectures for CO2 methanation: insights into structure–performance relationships

Abstract

An attractive alternative for CO2 utilization is its conversion into methane via the CO2 hydrogenation reaction. Catalysts with different structures represent promising materials for achieving higher CO2 conversions and CH4 selectivity. Four distinct nickel–silica catalysts were synthesized using different methods. High-resolution microscopy combined with EDS analysis confirmed the diverse structural features of the catalysts: a supported material (SUP), an encapsulated (embedded) structure (EMBD), a multi-core–shell morphology (SPHERE), and a nanoring morphology (RING). X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Hydrogen Temperature-Programmed Reduction (H2-TPR), nitrogen physisorption, and in situ DRIFTS revealed the distinct properties of these materials and provided insights into their internal structures and reaction mechanism. All catalysts showed the formation of well-dispersed nickel particles, with diameters in the range of 2–3 nm. The embedded catalyst stood out due to its stronger metal–support interaction and an encapsulated structure, which were attributed to its specific synthesis method. These characteristics contributed to its superior CH4 selectivity (83.35%) for the CO2 hydrogenation reaction at 300 °C, 1 atm, a CO2 : H2 ratio of 1 : 4, and a GHSV of 120 000 mL gcat−1 h−1. At 14 833 mL gcat−1 h−1, the EMBD catalyst remained stable for 50 h, with 60% CO2 conversion and a methane selectivity of 97%. The ability of the EMBD catalyst to direct the reaction toward methane was related to the combination of the encapsulation effect and the presence of nickel phyllosilicates, which strengthened metal–support interactions while also facilitating CO re-adsorption and conversion to methane.

Graphical abstract: A comparative study of nickel–silica catalyst architectures for CO2 methanation: insights into structure–performance relationships

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
28 Nov 2025
Accepted
15 May 2026
First published
26 May 2026

J. Mater. Chem. A, 2026, Advance Article

A comparative study of nickel–silica catalyst architectures for CO2 methanation: insights into structure–performance relationships

C. V. Weikert, M. Araque, B. Katryniok, F. S. Toniolo and F. B. Noronha, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2026, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D5TA09765G

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements