Wannian Zhaoa,
Ping Xieb,
Zhaogang Biana,
Aihua Zhou*a,
Haibo Ge*c,
Ben Niua and
Yingcai Dinga
aPharmacy School, Jiangsu University, Xuefu Road 301, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, People's Republic of China. E-mail: ahz@ujs.edn.cn
bScientific Information Research Institute, Jiangsu University (Library), Xuefu Road 301, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, People's Republic of China
cDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. E-mail: geh@iupui.edu
First published on 2nd July 2015
The regioselective and metal-free sulfenylation of flavones was achieved under aerobic conditions with ammonium iodide salt as an inducer instead of traditional iodine/oxidant combinations. This method enables the generation of various ArS-substituted flavone derivatives in good to excellent yields under environmentally friendly conditions, which significantly enriches current flavone chemistry.
Recently, transition metal-catalyzed C–S bond formation via direct C–H bond functionalization has risen as an efficient alternative method, which allows direct conversion of C–H into C–S bonds. Although this method is highly efficient and atom-economic, these reactions still suffer from the high loading of transition metal catalysts, additives and harsh reaction conditions sometimes.11
Very recently, metal-free iodine-induced sulfenylation method to construct C(sp2)–S bond was successfully developed (Scheme 1).12 This method doesn't need the use of any toxic and transitional metal catalysts, and proceeded well under environmentally friendly reaction conditions, generating thioesters in good yields. Despite this significant progress, the development of a new metal-free sulfenylation method is still highly desirable.
Herein, we developed a new and regioselective sulfenylation method in which a clean and colorless ammonium iodide salt was used as an reaction inducer instead of direct usage of purple iodine. In this study, air was used as the oxidant instead of pure oxygen and some oxidants (Scheme 1);12 and cheap aryl thiols were used as sulfenylating agents. To the best of our knowledge, there are no such reports to date. In this paper, this ammonium iodide-induced sulfenylation method was directly applied to electron-rich flavones to generate flavone derivatives which may be potentially valuable in drug discovery.
To find the suitable reaction conditions for the ammonium iodide-induced sulfenylation between flavones and aryl thiols, flavone 1a and thiol 2a were used as the representative reactants. Different catalysts/inducers, oxidants, and solvents were screened under different reaction temperature (Table 1). First, CuCl2 and FeCl3 were used as catalysts, and TBHP (tert-butyl hydroperoxide, 70 wt% in water) was employed as an oxidant. Both reactions gave a less than 5% yield or trace amount of expected product 3a (entries 1 and 2) at 80 °C in CH3CN. Using CuI as a catalyst with TBHP also provided a less than 5% yield of 3a (entry 3) in CH3CN. The combination of KI and TBHP only produced a 20% yield of 3a (entry 4). When I2 was employed with TBHP in CH3CN, 45% of 3a was observed (entry 5). The TBAI/TBHP combination in CH3CN didn't afford 3a at all (entry 6), while the combination of NH4I/TBHP in CH3CN afforded a 53% yield of 3a (entry 7). The combination of I2/TBHP or I2/DTBP afforded 3a in 70% and 65% yields, respectively (entries 8 and 9). When the reaction temperature was raised to 135 °C, the combination of NH4I/TBHP in CH3CN gave a 78% yield (entry 10). By converting NH4I into I2, the reaction afforded 75% yield of 3a (entry 11). Using DMF instead of CH3CN afforded 83% yield of 3a (entry 12). Surprisingly, when NH4I was used without TBHP, the reaction also gave an 86% yield of 3a (entry 13). Decreasing the amount of NH4I from 2.0 to 1.2 equivalents led to 64% yield (entry 14). Using CH3CN or THF as a solvent generated 55% yield or trace amount of product (entries 15 and 16). When toluene was used as a solvent, 73% yield of 3a (entry 17) was obtained. No presence of NH4I in DMF didn't produce any product (entry 18). Using H2O2 instead of TBHP as an oxidant in the presence of NH4I afforded 3a in a 65% yield (entry 19). While the combination of I2/H2O2 gave a 70% yield of 3a (entry 20). After the above screening, the suitable conditions selected for the coupling of flavone and aryl thiol are: flavone (1.0 equiv.), thiols (1.2 equiv.), NH4I (2.0 equiv.), DMF is used as a solvent and temperature: 135 °C.
Entry | Catalyst/inducer | Reagent | Temp. (°C) | Solvent | Yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: flavone (1 equiv.), aryl thiol (1.2 equiv.), NH4I (2.0 equiv.), aqueous TBHP (70 wt% in water, 2.0 equiv.), metal catalyst (10 mol%), DMF (0.5 mL).b Isolated yields are based on reactant 1a, the reaction was run for 15 hours with air.c NH4I (1.2 equiv.). | |||||
1 | CuCl2 | TBHP | 80 | CH3CN | 5 |
2 | FeCl3 | TBHP | 80 | CH3CN | Trace |
3 | CuI | TBHP | 80 | CH3CN | <5 |
4 | KI | TBHP | 80 | CH3CN | 20 |
5 | I2 | TBHP | 80 | CH3CN | 45 |
6 | TBAI | TBHP | 80 | CH3CN | 0 |
7 | NH4I | TBHP | 80 | CH3CN | 53 |
8 | I2 | DCP | 80 | CH3CN | 70 |
9 | I2 | DTBP | 80 | CH3CN | 65 |
10 | NH4I | TBHP | 135 | CH3CN | 78 |
11 | I2 | TBHP | 135 | CH3CN | 75 |
12 | NH4I | TBHP | 135 | DMF | 83 |
13 | NH4I | — | 135 | DMF | 86 |
14 | NH4Ic | — | 135 | DMF | 64 |
15 | NH4I | — | 135 | CH3CN | 55 |
16 | NH4I | — | 135 | THF | Trace |
17 | NH4I | — | 135 | Toluene | 73 |
18 | — | — | 135 | DMF | 0 |
19 | NH4I | H2O2 | 135 | DMF | 65 |
20 | I2 | H2O2 | 135 | DMF | 70 |
After suitable reaction conditions have been obtained, different aryl thiols were reacted with different flavones which were synthesized based on existing literature.13 From Table 2, it can be found that all flavones with electron-donating functions gave better yields, while flavones with electron-deficient functions gave a little bit lower yields. Based on 1H and 13C-NMR spectra of all products, it was found that –SAr was regioselectively added to the α-position of the ketone function of flavones, and no β-substituted products were isolated.
To further explore how the substituents on α and β-position of flavones influence the regioselective sulfenylation, two methyl-substituted flavones were synthesized with methyl function on α and β-position of the flavone (see Scheme 2, entries 1 and 2). When the α-position reaction site was blocked, no any expected product was isolated, indicating that the regioselectivity of this sulfenylation is very good, and the reaction only happened on the α-position of flavone. When the methyl group on the β-position of flavone, a decreased sulfenylation yield was observed, possibly due to the steric effects caused by neighbouring methyl function (Scheme 3).
To determine if a radical process is involved in this sulfenylation protocol, TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethypiperidine) and BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene) were used as radical scavengers in the reaction of producing 3a. In the presence of TEMPO or BHT, 3a was still produced in good yields (Scheme 2). This fact indicated that radical intermediate is not involved in the sulfenylation process. Based on the above results and existing literature,12a,14 a plausible nucleophilic substitution reaction mechanism is proposed below. At 135 °C, NH4I was split into NH3 and HI, and the resulting HI was further oxidized by air to generate iodine. Thiophenol was then reacted with iodine to form electrophilic species ArS–I, which reacted further with electron-rich flavone 1 to give reaction intermediate A. After the loss of a proton from intermediate A, final product 3 was obtained.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5ra10763f |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |