S 2B or not 2B?

Abstract

In recent years a large collection of experimental information has prompted proposals that an atom, S2B, part of the catalytic metal cluster FeMo-co of the enzyme nitrogenase, is displaced during the enzyme mechanism in order to allow the binding of substrate N2 to the adjacent Fe atoms. Computational investigation has generated a complete enzyme mechanism in which S2B is retained in its resting state position, and as such is an essential agent in the enzyme mechanism. A dilemma arises, between a disruptive mechanism – with S2B moved out of the way during the reaction steps – and a conservative mechanism – with S2B retained and necessarily used. Following the Prince of Denmark, is the 2B position of FeMo-co to be S or not to be S? I have assembled the evidence and arguments in this Perspective.

Graphical abstract: S 2B or not 2B?

Article information

Article type
Perspective
Submitted
12 Sep 2025
Accepted
21 Nov 2025
First published
22 Nov 2025
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Dalton Trans., 2026, Advance Article

S 2B or not 2B?

I. Dance, Dalton Trans., 2026, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D5DT02191J

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements