A comparison of the effects of polystyrene and polycaprolactone nanoplastics on macrophages.

Abstract

Plastics are persistent in the environment, which suggests that they may induce adverse effects due to their progressive accumulation over time. This progressive accumulation is facilitated by the fact that macroplastics released in the environment progressively fragment into micro and nanoplastics, which are easily taken up by a wide range of living organisms. As these micro and nanoplastics are particulate materials, they are handled in these living organisms by specialized phagocytic cells, namely macrophages in vertebrates, opening the possibility that plastics accumulating in macrophages may elicit a variety of responses. Thus, one way of alleviating such accumulation in macrophages and in other cell types would be to use biodegradable plastics. Polycaprolactone is a biodegradable plastic showing favorable degradation characteristics in several environments. We thus investigated the responses of macrophages upon treatment with polycaprolactone nanobeads, using a combination of proteomics and validation experiments, and compared these results to the ones induced by polystyrene nanobeads. Many changes detected by proteomics, for example in the mitochondrial, lysosomal or reticulum proteins did not induce detectable physiological consequences. A slight decrease in the phagocytic capacity of polycaprolactone-treated cells was detected, but not for polystyrene-treated cells. We also showed that polycaprolactone nanobeads degrade within a few days in macrophages, modulating the macrophage responses. The derease in phagocytosis disappeared, while polystyrene induced a delayed surge in the phagocytic response. A delayed decrease in the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines was also observed in of polycaprolactone-treated cells, which may be linked to the release of hydroxycaproic acid.

Supplementary files

Transparent peer review

To support increased transparency, we offer authors the option to publish the peer review history alongside their article.

View this article’s peer review history

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
20 ១ 2025
Accepted
17 ៦ 2025
First published
19 ៦ 2025
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY-NC license

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2025, Accepted Manuscript

A comparison of the effects of polystyrene and polycaprolactone nanoplastics on macrophages.

V. Collin-Faure, M. Boulée, H. Diemer, D. Fenel, C. Moriscot, S. Cianferani, E. Darrouzet, M. Carrière and T. Rabilloud, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2025, Accepted Manuscript , DOI: 10.1039/D5EN00074B

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications, without requesting further permission from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given and it is not used for commercial purposes.

To request permission to reproduce material from this article in a commercial publication, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party commercial publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements