Sylvie
Begin
a,
Sophie
Laurent
b,
Teresa
Pellegrino
c and
Nguyen Thi Kim
Thanh
*de
aStrasbourg Institute of Physics and Chemistry of Materials, University of Strasbourg, 67034 Strasbourg cedex, France
bUniversity of Mons, General, Organic and Biomedical Chemistry, NMR and Molecular Imaging Lab, 7000 Mons, Belgium
cIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Via Morego 30, 16 143 Genoa, Italy
dBiophysics Group, Department of Physics & Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
eUCL Healthcare Biomagnetics and Nanomaterials Laboratories, 21 Albemarle Street, London W1S 4BS, UK. E-mail: ntk.thanh@ucl.ac.uk
Achieving precise targeting and favorable biodistribution is also difficult. While theranostic platforms aim to deliver drugs directly/locally to diseased cells or tumors, they often exhibit off-target accumulation in organs such as the liver and spleen, reducing efficacy and increasing the risk of side effects. Similarly, ensuring controlled and stimuli-responsive drug release at the target site is technically challenging, particularly when relying on internal or external triggers like pH changes or light exposure.
On the diagnostic side, imaging sensitivity and resolution must be high enough to provide accurate data without being compromised by the therapeutic elements. Furthermore, these systems face regulatory and manufacturing hurdles, as their dual-function nature complicates classification and approval processes. Scaling up production while maintaining quality and consistency is also a significant barrier.
Finally, despite encouraging preclinical results, clinical translation of theranostic nanoplatforms remains limited. Issues such as poor in vivo stability, unpredictable pharmacokinetics, and a lack of standardization contribute to the slow transition from laboratory to clinical settings.
In that challenging context, this themed collection on Theranostic Nanoplatforms for Biomedicine with 65 accepted articles including 3 minireviews and 13 reviews shows the great, very active and high-level research activities conducted in that field and reports on promising researches showing progress in the design of theranostic nanoplatforms and in nanotechnology-based biomedical applications. Most of papers deal with oncology and multimodal imaging and therapy. For this collection as shown in the figure, cancer therapy (20%) and drug delivery systems (20%) are more frequently reported-on topics than are photo- and photodynamic therapy and magnetic systems (9–13%).
An important group of articles reported on biomimetic and functionalized nanomaterials. Inspired by biological systems, these nanoparticles—ranging from cell membrane-coated structures to protein-based and glycopolymer-engineered systems—demonstrate enhanced biocompatibility, immune evasion, and targeting specificity. Functionalization with targeting ligands such as RGD peptides, antibodies, and hyaluronic acid improves precision targeting to tumor markers and disease-associated receptors.
The design of hybrid and multimodal nanostructures consisting of combining materials such as metal–organic frameworks, silica shells, and biodegradable polymers is also outlined here. These complex architectures enhance functionality, enabling combined therapies (e.g., chemo-gene or photodynamic therapy (PDT)–photothermal therapy (PTT)), advanced imaging capabilities, and tunable physicochemical properties.
The theranostic integration, where diagnostic and therapeutic functionalities are combined within a single platform, remains an active and challenging research area. Multifunctional nanostructures are demonstrated to now enable simultaneous imaging and treatment, particularly for cancer. Magnetic nanoparticles, graphene quantum dots, and aggregation-induced emission (AIE) luminogens are being applied in real-time tumor imaging, PTT, and magnetic hyperthermia, offering more precise and minimally invasive interventions.
Another strong trend presented here is the design of stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems. These smart nanoplatforms are capable of releasing therapeutic agents in response to specific internal (e.g., pH, enzymatic activity) or external (e.g., light, ultrasound, magnetic fields) stimuli. Such responsiveness allows for spatiotemporally controlled therapies that minimize off-target effects while maximizing therapeutic impact.
The application of nanotechnology is also broadening beyond oncology. Notable advancements are seen in the treatment of infectious diseases, pulmonary disorders, cardiovascular conditions, and autoimmune diseases, as well as in gene therapy and immunotherapy. Biomaterial-based enhancements of CAR-T therapy, bacterial infection imaging, and even wound healing through smart sutures and hydrogels highlight this expanding scope.
Technological advances in manufacturing and characterization techniques are shown to play a pivotal role. Microfluidics, nanoimprint lithography, and Bayesian optimization are being used to achieve greater control over nanoparticle uniformity, loading efficiency, and structural precision. Complementary tools such as PET, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, and machine learning simulations are deepening our understanding of biodistribution, cellular uptake, and target interactions.
Finally, as clinical translation becomes increasingly important, there is growing attention to toxicity, systemic interactions, and regulatory challenges. Biodegradable, food-grade, and naturally-derived materials are thus detailed as well as nanoparticle interactions with the gut microbiome, immune system, and metabolic pathways.
Collectively, these articles and reviews reflect a shift toward more personalized, targeted, and integrative approaches in nanomedicine. As technologies mature, the synergy between diagnostics and therapeutics holds the potential to reshape how diseases are detected, monitored, and treated in the near future.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |