Shuai Liua,
Wenzhao Suna,
Zhiyuan Gua,
Kaiyang Wanga,
Nan Zhanga,
Shumin Xiao*b and
Qinghai Song*a
aIntegrated Nanoscience Lab, Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China 518055. E-mail: qinghai.song@hitsz.edu.cn
bIntegrated Nanoscience Lab, Department of Material Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China 518055. E-mail: Shumin.xiao@hitsz.edu.cn
First published on 18th May 2016
Laser emissions from perovskite microplates have been intensively studied recently. However, due to their relatively large sizes, most of them produced multiple lasing modes simultaneously. In order to improve the monochromaticity of perovskite microlasers without significantly affecting the output energy, here we demonstrate a simple way to tailor the number of lasing modes in a microcavity. By pushing an additional microplate to contact the lasing microplate, the number of lasing modes has been effectively reduced and single-mode laser operation has been achieved even though the size of the microplate is orders of magnitude larger than the lasing wavelengths. The corresponding extinction ratio can be as high as 11.8 dB. Our experimental results show that introducing the second microplate and the extremely narrow gain region play essential roles in achieving single-mode laser operation. We believe that our findings will be interesting for the applications of perovskite microdisk lasers.
Monochromaticity is one of the key characteristics of lasers. In past decade achieving single-mode operation in laser systems has become a primary goal of cavity design, especially for the micro-sized laser that are too small to be tailored as conventional laser systems.16–22 Several approaches have been developed to suppress the competing parasitic modes, by adding intracavity dispersive elements,16 reducing the cavity size,17 and spatially modulate the pumping and gain.18 Very recently, parity-time symmetry breaking19,20 and mode coupling21,22 have also been applied to control the lasing modes in microcavities. Single-mode operations with extinction ratios more than 15 dB have been demonstrated in either double disks or single cavity. All these progresses have significantly boosted the possibly practical applications of microlasers. Unfortunately, most of these techniques cannot be applied in the recently developed perovskite microdisk lasers due to their relatively low stabilities in most solutions.23 Reducing the cavity size can improve the monochromaticity.14 But it will also reduce the total emission intensity.17 Here, by introducing an additional perovskite via micro-manipulation, the thresholds of different lasing modes in lasing microdisk have been significantly distinguished and single-mode laser operation has been achieved.
Fig. 1(a) shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the synthesized perovskite microplates. Besides the numerous micro- & nano-wires, most of the microplates have rectangle shapes. The lengths and widths of rectangle microplates mostly range from a few micron to tens of micron (see ESI†). The thicknesses of microplates are usually below 1 micron. Fig. 1(b) shows the linear absorption and photoluminescence spectra of the synthesized perovskites. The absorption coefficient decreases quickly at wavelength around 535 nm and becomes saturated at shorter wavelength. This is a typical absorption spectrum and clearly shows the bandgap of CH3NH3PbBr3 perovskite at Eg = 2.31 eV. The photoluminescence is a broad peak centered at 535 nm with full width at half maximum (FWHM) ∼24 nm. The photoluminescence and absorption spectra overlap in a large wavelength range.
Fig. 2(c) shows the dependence of output intensity on the pumping density. With the increase of pumping density, a clear “S” shaped curve can be observed in the log–log plot. The slope quickly changes from ∼1 to ∼7 above 6.1 μJ cm−2 and finally reaches the gain saturation. The superliner shows the transition from spontaneous emission to amplification. The crosses in Fig. 2(c) show the linewidths of the emission spectra. With the onset of sharp peaks, the linewidth quickly reduces from ∼28 nm to below 1 nm. All these phenomena confirm the lasing actions in microplate well and a threshold ∼6.1 μJ cm−2 can be simply obtained. The measured perovskite microplates with good lasing properties in our experiment usually have relative small thickness (ranging from 300 nm to 600 nm). Therefore, the lasing modes can't be effectively supported along the vertical direction. All of the lasing modes in this manuscript are along the in-plane of the microplates.
The lasing modes from perovskite microplate have different mode spacings. The mode spacing of left two main peaks and their side small peaks is around 1.8 nm. From the equation for the mode spacing Δλ = λ2/(n − λdn/dλ)L, the calculated cavity length L is around 60 micron, which matches the length of diamond orbit in rectangle microplate well. In a similar process, the modes at relatively longer wavelength are determined as Fabry–Perot modes along the long side. In principle, two types of resonances are localized by different mechanisms. The diamond modes are confined by total internal reflection at four boundaries, whereas the Fabry–Perot modes are mainly reflected by two end-facets. In this sense, two types of lasing modes have the possibility to be separated experimentally.
Besides the lasing actions, it is also interesting to study the wavelength range of the lasing actions. As shown in Fig. 2(b), we define a parameter W to characterize the spectral range from the left laser peak to the right laser peak. We have measured totally ten samples. As shown in Fig. 2(d), the lasing wavelengths ranges slightly vary around 10 nm (from 5 nm to 15 nm). And all the lasing peaks are distributed around 553 nm (see the ESI†). The narrow lasing wavelength region corresponds to the range with maximal net gain (amplification–absorption). This region is formed because that the intrinsic absorption is quickly increased at shorter wavelength and the gain is reduced at the longer wavelength (see Fig. 1(b)).
Fig. 3(b) shows the emission spectrum when the second microplate is pushed close to the initial one. Similar to Fig. 2, a broad spontaneous emission peak has been observed at low pumping density. Once the pumping power is above 6.1 μJ cm−2, lasing modes can be clearly observed at around 551 nm (see Fig. 3(b)). Different from the results in Fig. 2, here the left two peaks disappear and the spectrum completely consists of the Fabry–Perot modes in Fig. 2. Fig. 3(c) shows the output intensity as a function of pumping density. Similar to Fig. 2(c), a clear threshold behavior can be observed at around 6.1 μJ cm−2. Meanwhile, we can also see the reduction of linewidth around 6.1 μJ cm−2. Thus the lasing actions in double microplates can also be confirmed.
From the results in Fig. 3, we know that the mode number is decreased by adding the second microplate. This mode suppression is expected as the mechanisms of light confinements for two types of resonances are different. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the second microplate closely touches the right side of the first one. Then the total internal reflection at the right boundary of the first microplate is broken. Meanwhile, as two microplates have quite different thicknesses, strong scattering losses shall happen at the interface and exclude the possibility of forming resonances within two microplates simultaneously.24 Consequently, the entire whispering gallery-like modes such as 4-bounce diamond modes and 6-bounce double-diamond modes are suppressed. On the contrary, the Fabry–Perot modes along the long side of rectangle can survive because they are almost independent on the reflection at the right side of the first microplate. This information can also be confirmed by the laser thresholds. Fig. 2(c) and Fig. 3(c) show that the thresholds of Fabry–Perot modes are almost the same. Interestingly, as the diamond modes are killed by the structure, all the pumped gain is used by the Fabry–Perot modes in double microplate. Therefore, the intensities of Fabry–Perot modes in double microplates are almost one order of magnitude higher than the ones in single microplate. As the perovskite microplate can only provide finite gain, the double microplates can thus efficiently utilize the gain in particular lasing mode.
Then we gradually push another microplate close to it. Fig. 4(c) shows the SEM image of the second microplate (Disk-2). The length and width of the second microplate are 20.83 μm and 15.59 μm, respectively. Similar to above setting, this microplate is not pumped in optical experiment and it won't lase experimentally to ensure all the lasing modes come from the initial microplate. The dashed line in Fig. 4(d) shows the emission spectra from double microplates. Similar to Fig. 3, the number of lasing modes is reduced by the second microplate. Remarkably, here only one lasing peak dominates the emission spectrum. The other modes of single microplate have been well suppressed. And the extinction ratio in Fig. 4(d) is about 11.8 dB. This means that single-mode operation has been obtained even though the cavity sizes are orders of magnitude larger than the lasing wavelengths.
The formation of the single-mode operation is also expected. While there are a number of lasing modes in single microplate (see solid line in Fig. 4(d)), they can be categorized to different groups by their mode spacings. The peaks marked by the upward arrows and downward arrows correspond to the modes along diamond orbit with different mode orders (with mode spacing around 2.6 nm). These lasing modes are thus confined by total internal reflection at four boundaries.25–28 Once the second microplate contact the side of initial microplate, all these modes shall be suppressed. The peaks at 556.625 nm and 553.983 nm are considered as Fabry–Perot cavities modes. As only the mode at 556.625 nm exists in the laser spectrum of double microplates, these two modes should be Fabry–Perot modes along long side and short side of rectangle, respectively.
One may think that the Fabry–Perot resonances also can also generate multiple lasing modes, just as what we have observed in Fig. 3(c). Here we note that two effects play the key roles in mode selection. The mode spacing between Fabry–Perot modes along long side is around 3.75 nm. Meanwhile, the lasing wavelength range (W) in the inset of Fig. 4(b) is only 5.7 nm. Thus there are at most two Fabry–Perot modes in the laser spectrum. As the mode appears at 556.625 nm around the center of gain region, only one lasing mode has been obtained in our experiment. Of course, a microwire with similar length and gain spectral region can also form such kind of single-mode operation. However, as the gain material of microwire is much smaller than the microplate, the total output intensity is also quite lower than the microplate laser.
To confirm the dependence of single-operation on coupling between two microplates, we have also studied the evolution of laser spectrum by slightly changing the position of the second microplate. All the results are summarized in Fig. 5. When two microplates are widely separated at positon-1, only the upper disk (the initial lasing disk) shows bright spots on all four boundaries in the fluorescent microscope image. Consequently, multiple laser peaks can be observed in the laser spectrum. When two microplates are gradually pushed close to one another at positon-2, both the fluorescent image and laser spectrum are well kept. This is because that the separation distance is still much larger than the lasing wavelength (can be seen in the microscope image in Fig. 5(c)) and the mode interaction via evanescent waves can be neglected. Further pushing the second microplate to position-3 and position-4, where two microplates contact, significant changes can be observed. In the fluorescent microscope image, we can see that the positions of bright spots change from all four boundaries to left and right two boundaries. Meanwhile, the laser spectrum transits to single mode. The fluorescent microscope images also clear show that the single mode is formed by the refection at two end-facets, consistent with the above analysis well. To confirm that single-mode laser is formed by two contacted microplates instead of damaging the first one, we have further moved the second microplate. Once the second microplate is pushed to position-5, where two microplates are separated again, the laser spectrum changes back to multiple laser peaks. And the lasing wavelengths match the initial laser peak at positon-1 well. This shows that the laser spectrum can be recovered by moving away the second microplate. Therefore, our experimental results clearly show that placing an additional microplate can effectively control the mode numbers and even form single-mode operation in perovskite microplate.
We note that tailoring the number of lasing modes through an additional microplate is quite robust in perovskite microplates. We have observed similar single-mode lasing action in a number of microplates with cavity sizes around 10–15 μm. Fig. 6 is another example of single-mode lasing emission via micro-manipulation. Similar to the above results, the clear superliner slope of the output intensity and narrow line width conform the lasing actions. Inset is the high resolution spectra at pumping density 51.3 μJ cm−2. Fig. 6(b) is the detailed spectrum at different pump density. We can clearly see that one peak still dominates the lasing spectrum even under the strong excitations, indicating the single-mode lasing emission is not on account of the low pump density. What's more, the other samples with single-mode emission have also been summarized in the ESI.† Moreover, the whispering gallery-like modes are usually suppressed and only Fabry–Perot modes are left in above experiments. This is simply because these two types of resonances are much easier to be distinguished. Here we realize these experiments with a typical three-dimensional translation stage (resolution > 1 micron). In principle, any two types of resonances with different localization mechanisms can be separated by using the same method. Of course, much precise position control of the second microplate is required.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ra06415a |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 |