Quanxing
Mao
a,
Yujie
Meng
a,
Yuhang
Feng
a,
Hui
Li
*b and
Tianyi
Ma
*b
aCollege of Chemistry, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China
bSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia. E-mail: tianyi.ma@rmit.edu.au; hui.li2@rmit.edu.au
First published on 4th December 2023
Organelle imaging is an efficient approach to gain information about intracellular events and dynamics of subcellular structures. In this case, carbon dots (CDs) are outstanding fluorescent probes for organelle imaging due to their excellent biocompatibility, tunable and stable fluorescence, anti-photobleaching, and easy and cheap preparation. In the past decade, numerous investigations have made great progress in regulating the physicochemical properties of CDs for targeted organelle imaging. However, there are several obstacles that hinder the further understanding of subcellular events, such as the unsatisfactory organelle specificity of CDs and their inconsistent organelle-targeting mechanism. In addition, researchers have focused on how to produce organelle-targeting CDs but ignored the fact that cells and organelles also affect the subcellular distribution of CDs. Thus, in this review, we outline the development in the field of organelle-targeting imaging using CDs as probes, summarize the general strategies for targeted imaging using CDs, discuss the challenges in this field, and propose potential solutions. We hope that this review will facilitate the further development of organelle imaging using CDs as probes.
Carbon dots (CDs) show great potential application in the fluorescence imaging of organelles due their favourable fluorescence, high photo- and chemical-stability, excellent biocompatibility, low toxicity, easy preparation, tunable organelle targeting, and high resolution.8–11 Wang12 and Yang13 were the first researchers to observe that CDs are distributed mainly in the cytoplasm. Li investigated the distribution of CDs in HeLa, SMCC-7721, and HEK293 cells using fluorescence images and TEM images and found similar results.14 Karthik first reported that quinolone-tethered CDs were distributed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus.15 Datta prepared cationic quaternized CDs that could label the cell nucleus and reported that the distribution of CDs could be regulated by combining them with anionic graphene oxide.16 Since then, increasing research has focused on imaging the nucleus and nucleolus using different carbon dots.17–28 Meanwhile, the fluorescence imaging of the mitochondrion,29–38 lysosome,39–46 endoplasm reticulum,47–50 Golgi apparatus51–55 and lipid drops56–61 using CDs has also witnessed great developments. Recent reviews summarized the progress in individual organelle imaging, highlighting the properties, precursors, and sensing applications of CDs.62–64 However, to date, there are still no straightforward strategies for organelle targeting using CDs, the interactions between CDs and organelles are not clear, and the organelle-targeting mechanism of CDs is controversial. Furthermore, a review addressing these issues is still lacking.
In this review, we focus on the key issues associated with the use of CDs as organelle imaging probes. Initially, we summarize the general strategies for organelle imaging using CDs, including the intrinsic targeting ability of one-pot CDs, post-modification with specific species, and uptake pathways of CDs. Then, we outline the challenges in preparing “ideal” CDs probes and investigating their targeting mechanism, including their unsatisfactory organelle specificity and lack of CDs targeting less-concerned organelles. Subsequently, we suggest potential solutions, where we highlight the purification and intracellular transport of CDs, the interaction between CDs and intracellular molecules, and the super-resolution imaging techniques.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 (A) Schematic representation of functional preservation strategy to prepare lysosome-targeting CDs and imaging of lysosomal pH, reprinted with permission from ref. 44, Copyright 2018, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Confocal fluorescence images of MCF-7 cells treated with CDs prepared from spermine and rose bengal, reprinted with permission from ref. 69, Copyright 2021, Elsevier Ltd. (C) Schematic illustration of the preparation of lysosome-targeting CDs and their application in the detection of FA, reprinted with permission from ref. 46, Copyright 2019, The Royal Society of Chemistry. |
Recently, Singh et al. obtained lysosome-targeting CDs by hydrothermal treating extracts of neem plant roots without clear identification of their composition. The authors speculated that the appropriate lipophilicity induced by the –COOH, C–O–C, and amino functionalities on the surface helped to achieve specific lysosomal localization.73 A similar result was reported in another study, in which CDs with moderate lipophilicity were prepared via the hydrothermal carbonization of chloranil and triethylenetetramine, which targeted lysosomes within 30 min.74 Zhi purified the raw products from the hydrothermal treatment of citric acid and urea in formamide with a C18 reversed-phase column and obtained blue-emitting CDs (CD-B) and red-emitting CDs (CD-R), which targeted lysosomes/mitochondria and only lysosomes, respectively. The authors proposed that the difference in the hydrodynamic size of the CDs was responsible for the difference in their localization.75 These studies show some inconsistencies with respect to the structure–activity relationship of lysosome-targeting CDs, but may also open up more potential ways to prepare lysosome-targeting CDs.
Datta obtained cationic quaternized carbon dots by heating a mixture of tris and betaine, which possessed a zeta potential as high as +53 mV.16 The strong positive charge facilitated the interaction between the CDs and DNA/RNA, resulting in the localization of the CDs in the nucleus. Several later studies also reported the preparation of nucleus/nucleolus-targeting CDs with positive-charged surfaces using dopamine/ethylenediamine,19p-phenylenediamine/Ni2+,27 1,5-diaminonaphthalene,76 citric acid/PEI,77m-phenylenediamine/p-aminobenzoic acid,78 and m-phenylenediamine/aminourea hydrochloride.79 The interaction between CDs and DNA/RNA was identified by enzymolysis experiments, in which CDs could stain only the nucleus or nucleolus after the cells were treated with RNase or DNase.27,80–83
Interestingly, negatively charged CDs can also interact with DNA/RNA and target the nucleus/nucleolus.22,23,28,84,85 Hua et al. attributed the RNA affinity to the specific surface chemistry of the CDs (Fig. 2A).23 Li suggested that there is non-covalent interaction between the negatively charged CDs and nucleic acid because of the increase in fluorescence upon the addition of DNA or RNA.28 Liu proposed that the hydrogen bonding of the CDs with DNA/RNA facilitated the nuclear targeting (Fig. 2B).86 Given that hydroxyl/carboxyl groups commonly remain on the surface of CDs, we believe that the hydrogen bonding explanation is more reasonable. Kong suggested that the protonation of the oxygen groups in CDs facilitates their interaction with the alkaline chromatin, which may result in their nucleus-targeting ability.87 Besides positively/negatively charged CDs, zwitterionic CDs can also target the nucleus or nucleolus due to their zwitterionic surface.18,25,88 It is noteworthy that most of these investigations addressed the importance of small-size CDs for nuclear targeting because large CDs would be excluded by the nuclear pore complex.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 (A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of CDs for nucleus imaging and the interaction between CDs and DNA, reprinted with permission from ref. 23, Copyright 2018, the American Chemical Society. (B) Presentation of the preparation of negative-charged CDs with intrinsic nuclear imaging ability due to the hydrogen bond, reprinted with permission from ref. 86, Copyright 2019, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) Schematic illustration of the preparation of nucleus-targeting CDs and their application in multiple cell lines, reprinted with permission from Ref. 82, Copyright 2022, Elsevier Ltd. (D) Illustration of the preparation of nucleus-targeting CDs from biomass, reprinted with permission from ref. 90, Copyright 2020, the American Chemical Society. |
Different from the above-mentioned studies in which CDs were obtained at high temperatures, Choi et al. prepared a type of nucleus-targeting CDs at room temperature via an acid-assisted carbonization method by treating the product of C/C12-PEG-g-PDMA and 1,3-propane sultone.89 The surface of the obtained CDs contained zwitterionic dodecane/sulfobetaine groups. The response to a variation in pH by these zwitterionic groups facilitated the transportation of the CDs from the cytosol to the nucleus in cancer cells, but not in normal cells. Therefore, it is promising to develop a cancer diagnostic tool that can differentiate normal cells from cancer cells using these CDs.
Besides organic molecules, natural materials without certain structures such as hydrogenated rosin could also be used to produce nucleus-localized CDs (Fig. 2D).90 The CDs could be used to detect Fe3+ with a detection limit of 6.16 μM.
Wu's group prepared mitochondrial-targeting CDs via the one-step hydrothermal treatment of mercaptosuccinic acid, ethylenediamine, and chitosan.32 The intrinsic mitochondria-targeting ability was attributed to the sufficient delocalization, lipophilicity, and positive charges of the CDs. The CDs were used to achieve mitochondria-targeted photodynamic therapy (Fig. 3A).32 They also reported the preparation of CDs using glycerol and silane to target mitochondria due to the presence of cationic species on the CDs. The CDs were responsive to polarity, and thus used to differentiate cancerous cells from normal cells.33 In another study, mitochondria-targeting single-layered graphene quantum dots (sGQDs) were prepared via the hydrothermal treatment of perylene tetracarboxylic anhydride and polyethylenimine.36 The sGQDs localized in the mitochondria selectively and the positive charges and lipophilic features of sGQDs were responsible for the organelle targeting. Several subsequent studies also attributed the intrinsic targeting ability of CDs to their positive surface charges and the electronic interaction between CDs and mitochondria (Fig. 3B).91–94 However, it is noteworthy that this electronic interaction mechanism is not specific. CDs with positive charges on their surface can be localized in mitochondria and endoplasm reticulum, or mitochondria and nucleolus, simultaneously.71,95,96 Besides, negatively charged CDs decorated with citric acid could also target mitochondria, which was driven by the affinity between citric acid and mitochondria.97 If this affinity can be validated widely, there will be another approach towards intrinsic mitochondria-targeting CDs.
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 (A) Schematic illustrating the synthetic route of CDs and their applications as a fluorescent mitochondrial-tracker, reprinted with permission from ref. 32, Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Preparation of self-targeting CQDs and their application for mitochondrial ONOO− imaging, reprinted with permission from ref. 93, Copyright 2021, the American Chemical Society. (C) Dynamic lipid droplet coalescence observed from fluorescent imaging results with CDs as probes, reprinted with permission from ref. 99, Copyright 2023, Elsevier Ltd. (D) CLSM images of co-localization with different organelles from an ER-targeting CDs, reprinted with permission from ref. 100, Copyright 2020, The Royal Society of Chemistry. |
Liu prepared two novel types of amphiphilic LD-targeting CDs via the one-step treatment of o-phenylenediamine at room temperature and 200 °C.56 The CDs achieved long-term tracking of LDs, and thus were successfully applied for the real-time monitoring of lipid catabolism and pharmacodynamic evaluation of lipid-lowering drugs. Wang prepared LD-targeting CDs via the hydrothermal treatment of 4-piperidinoaniline at 160 °C in ethanol.61 After a comparative experiment with commercial LD-targeting dyes (Nile red and BODIPY 493/503), the authors revealed that the targeting ability of the CDs for LD can be attributed to their high lipophilicity. Other subsequent investigations also proved this lipophilicity targeting mechanism by using CDs prepared from 3-dimethylaminophenol,59 2,6-dibromo naphthalene dianhydride in ethylene glycol,98 mixture of 1,2-diamino-4-fluorobenzene and thiourea in N,N-dimethylformamide,58 and mixture of o-phenylenediamine and thiourea in N,N-dimethylformamide.99 Gao et al. demonstrated the formation of a D–π–A structure via the Schiff base reaction between phenylenediamine and N,N-dimethylformamide, which are important precursors for the formation of LD-targeting CDs.58 They also suggested that the lipophilic CH3 group on the CDs played a vital role in determining the location of the as-prepared CDs in LD. By using the LD-targeting CDs, they observed the LD coalescence dynamics (Fig. 3C).99
In contrast, fewer intrinsic ER-targeting CDs have been reported. In our previous investigations, two types of ER-targeting CDs were obtained via the hydrothermal treatment of mixtures of o-phenylenediamine and lysine/urea.49,100 The co-localization studies proved the high specificity of the CDs towards ER (Fig. 3D).100 Wu et al.50 synthesized CDs via a facile one-pot hydrothermal method without additional modification, which possessed a positive charge, lipophilic surface, and boric acid groups, which endowed the CDs with two-stage cascade recognition ability for the endoplasmic reticulum. Wu101 obtained CDsomesmemvia the liquid–liquid extraction in butanol/water of the crude products from heating triolein at 220 °C for 3 days. The CDsomesmem formed liposome-like structures and were distributed in the ER and other membrane systems due to their lipophilicity.
A typical example of this strategy is the generation of Golgi-apparatus-targeting CDs. According to previous reviews, the widely recognized targeting groups for the Golgi apparatus include norrisolide, phenyl sulfonamide, L-cysteine, kapakahines, bovine serum albumin-dyes complex, 7-aminoquinolines, and sphingolipids.103 Huang's group51 reported the preparation of Golgi-targeting CDs from citrate acid and L-cysteine and demonstrated that L-cysteine remaining on the surface of the CDs combined with the sulfhydryl receptor site of the Golgi apparatus, which was the origin of their specificity towards the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 4A). They also achieved the precise delivery of ricin A-chain using the as-prepared Golgi-targeting CDs.55 Penicillamine contains a similar structure to L-cysteine, and CDs prepared from D/L-penicillamine and citrate acid targeted the Golgi apparatus specifically.53 Benzene sulfonamide has a selective affinity for cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), which is one of the signature proteins of the Golgi apparatus.103 Thus, CDs generated from benzene sulfonamide and p-phenylenediamine could be used for the selective imaging of the Golgi apparatus via the specific affinity for COX-2.54
![]() | ||
Fig. 4 (A) Synthetic route of L-cysteine-rich chiral carbon quantum dots (LC-CQDs) and the Golgi imaging results, reprinted with permission from ref. 51, Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Schematic illustration of the preparation of CD-MB with boronic acid groups on its surface and its ER-targeting ability via a two-stage cascade ER recognition process, reprinted with permission from ref. 50, Copyright 2022, the American Chemical Society. (C) Illustration of preparation of lysosome-targeting CDs from citric acid and N,N-dimethylaniline, reprinted with permission from ref. 102, Copyright 2020, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (D) Schematic presentation of mitochondrial-targeting CDs from TPP, reprinted with permission from ref. 106, Copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons. (E) Retrosynthesis of mitochondria-targeting CDs and mitophagy tracking, reprinted with permission from ref. 38, Copyright 2019, the American Chemical Society. |
Another example illustrating this strategy is the dynamic visualization of endoplasmic reticulum stress in living cells using ER-targeting CDs prepared from 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid and ethylenediamine (Fig. 4B).50 Boric acid groups can selectively connect with the o-dihydroxy group of mannose in the ER cavity, and thereby the as-prepared CDs achieved specific targeting of the ER. It should be noted that the positively charged and lipophilic surface of the CDs facilitated their accumulation in the ER, which also played an indispensable role.
In the case of lysosomes, the typical targeting groups are morpholine and N,N-dimethyl groups.104 Li's group selected N,N-dimethylaniline and citric acid as precursors to prepare CDs and successfully obtained intrinsic lysosomal-targeting CDs with ultra-stability for long-term imaging (Fig. 4C).102 The as-prepared CDs localized in lysosomes in different cell lines such as HepG2, HL-7702, and 3T3 cells. By employing the photo-stability and long-term co-localization performance of the CDs, they achieved the tracking of lysosome movements under the stimulation of chloroquine.
Thiazole orange is a specific DNA/RNA-targeting dye. Yin et al. prepared nucleolus-targeting CDs by heating 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde and 2,3-dimethylbenzothiazole iodide in a microwave reactor, in which the precursors contained thiazole groups.105 The CDs showed selective affinity towards RNA, and thus localized in the nucleolus specifically. Besides, the small particle size and polarity response behaviour of the CDs realized fast nucleolus imaging effectively.
The use of triphenylphosphonium (TPP) as a precursor can ensure the achievement of mitochondrion-targeting CDs in most cases. Rajendran et al. employed a simple one-step carbonization method using TPP and PEG-di-NH2 as carbon precursors and surface passivation reagent, respectively (Fig. 4D).106 The TPP molecules carbonized and formed the CDs, while the amine groups of PEG-di-NH2 attached or absorbed on the surface of the CDs to endow them with water dispersibility and enhance their fluorescence. Incubation with prostate cancer (PC-3), colon cancer (HCT116), neuroblastoma (SHSY5Y), and cervical cancer (HeLa) cells confirmed the mitochondrion-targeting ability of the CDs. The TPP moieties remained on the surface of the CDs, facilitating the labeling of mitochondria. Furthermore, the polarity and high lipophilicity of the residual TPP imparted excellent penetration in the mitochondrial intermembrane potential barrier.
Notably, Li's group modified the concept of retrosynthesis from organic chemistry to fabricate mitochondrion-specific CDs.37 In their design of the synthetic route, citric acid and m-aminophenol formed a rhodamine structure, which served as both the mitochondria-targeting unit and luminescent center. They prepared mitochondria-tracking CDs (MitoTCD) from citric acid and m-aminophenol through microwave irradiation. By changing the substituent groups of m-aminophenol, several MitoTCDs with different fluorescence emissions and quantum yields were achieved. Employing the same strategy, they used citric acid and 8-hydroxyjulolidine to synthesize rhodamine-like fluorophores, which were further polymerized and carbonized to form another type of mitochondrion-specific CDs (Fig. 4E).38 Although the organelle-targeting CDs prepared from specific precursors provide results that are more reliable, these studies are much less than that generated by unspecific precursors, which may hold great potential for developing organelle-targeting CDs.
He et al. simplified the procedures to prepare lysosome-targeting CDs.41 Initially, they prepared amino group-functionalized CDs via a one-pot method by heating a mixture of citrate acid and ethylenediamine rather than modifying carboxylated CDs with ethylenediamine. Subsequently, morpholine was covalently modified on the surface of the CDs to endow them with lysosome-targeting ability. Combining the fluorescence response of the 1,8-naphthalimide derivative to H+, the pH variation in the lysosome was tracked via fluorescence imaging.
In another investigation, Wu et al. prepared two types of lysosome-targeting CDs, i.e., CDs-MP and CDs-PEI-ML (Fig. 5A).42 CDs-MP was prepared by modifying aminating morpholine on the surface of carboxylic CDs, which were synthesized via the hydrothermal treatment of citrate acid. Alternatively, CDs-PEI-ML was prepared by modifying carboxylic morpholine on the surface of aminated CDs, which were synthesized via the hydrothermal treatment of a mixture of citrate acid and PEI. Both CDs-MP and CDs-PEI-ML targeted lysosomes with high specificity, high photostability, and low cytotoxicity. However, CDs-PEI-ML showed a 4-fold higher fluorescence intensity than CDs-MP, which indicates that CDs-PEI-ML is a more suitable fluorescent probe for lysosome imaging.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 (A) Illustration of preparation of lysosome-targeting CDs via modification with 4-(2-aminoethyl) morpholine, reprinted with permission from ref. 42, Copyright 2017, the American Chemical Society. (B) Design of lysosome-targeting ratiometric probe based on CDs, reprinted with permission from ref. 45, Copyright 2019, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) Illustration of the possible process for endocytosis and localization of NLS-CD complex in the nucleus, reprinted with permission from ref. 24, Copyright 2015, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (D) Presentation of the synthesis of mitochondrial-targeting CDs via modification with TPP and the subcellular localization of TPP-CDs and non-targeting CDs colocalized with MitoTracker Deep Red, reprinted with permission from ref. 65, Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry. |
Zhang et al. synthesized nanohybrid Ru1@CDs by modifying an Ru(II) complex (Ru1) on CDs.43 Initially, they prepared intrinsic lysosome-targeting Ru1 and CDs, and then combined them via a simple condensation reaction using EDC and NHS as coupling agents. According to the colocalization experiments of Ru1@CDs, CDs, or Ru1 with commercial lysosome-targeting dyes (LTDR), the colocalization coefficients of Ru1@CDs, CDs, and Ru1 with LTDR were 0.88, 0.86, and 0.85, respectively. This demonstrated that Ru1@CDs, CDs, and Ru1 can specifically image lysosome. However, the photodynamic therapy results indicated that Ru1@CDs possessed higher potency of being an efficient agent for PDT treatment of cancer.
Chen et al. reported the synthesis of naphthalimide derivative-functionalized CDs (CDs-ND) for imaging formaldehyde in the lysosome (Fig. 5B).45 They prepared the CDs by heating methionine and citric acid and obtained CDs-ND by covalently modifying the naphthalimide derivative on CDs. The colocalization experiment of CDs-ND with Lyso-Tracker Deep Red demonstrated the excellent lysosome-targeting ability of CDs-ND with a high Pearson colocalization coefficient of 0.93. Alternatively, CDs and ND only exhibited low Pearson colocalization coefficients of 0.46 and 0.56, respectively. The confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging results showed that the fluorescence signal of CDs-ND in HeLa cells responded to the content of formaldehyde in the lysosome, indicating the that CDs-ND is a favorable probe for monitoring the endogenous formaldehyde in living systems.
Yang proposed a nuclear localization signal (NLS) peptide-decorated CD conjugate to achieve targeted nucleus staining (Fig. 5C).24 Initially, CD@PEG was prepared via the hydrothermal treatment of a mixture of PEG-2000, citrate acid and ethylenediamine at 160 °C for 8 h. Subsequently, NLS (PKKKRKVG) was covalently conjugated to CDs through the EDC/NHS coupling reaction to obtain the final NLS-CDs. After entering the cells, NLS-CDs combined with importin and formed an NLS-CDs-importin complex, and this complex passed through the nuclear pore to localize in the cell nucleus. Based on this study, they modified NLS-CDs with 4-hydrazinobenzoic acid (HBA) and conjugated DOX with the CDs through a hydrazone bond. The obtained conjugates delivered the anti-cancer drug DOX to the nucleus and killed cancer cells, which show potential as a promising nano-drug with enhanced therapeutic efficiency.107
Tan et al. reported another example in which CDs were functionalized with a peptide to achieve cell nucleus-targeted imaging.20 Initially, they synthesized CDs by heating a mixture of bovine serum albumin and formic acid, and then functionalized the CDs with the transactivator of transcription (TAT) peptide (GRKKRRQRRRPQ) to obtain TAT-CDs. The modification with the TAT peptide could overcome the lipophilic barrier of the cellular membrane and deliver the CDs into the cellular nucleus.
Small organic molecules can also be used to modify CDs and endow them with nucleus-targeting features. Barbosa et al. modified carboxylated CDs with ethylenediamine using thionyl chloride.17 The modified CDs are likely to have an affinity with ribosomal components, enabling the CDs to target the nucleus in the MCF-7 (breast cancer cells), MDA-MB-231 (breast cancer cells), Caco-2 (colorectal cancer cells) and DU145 (prostate cancer cells) cell lines.
Han et al. reported the synthesis of cationic carbon quantum dots that can distinguish nucleic acid structures and image the nucleus specifically.21 The carbon quantum dots were prepared via the oxidization of conductive carbon nanoparticles in refluxing HNO3, acylation with p-phenylenediamine (pda), and chemical linkage with 4-carboxybutyl triphenylphosphonium (PPh3+) bromide. The carbon quantum dots could be inserted into the grooves of dsDNA and the fluorescence was enhanced. In contrast, the fluorescence emission was bathochromically shifted and a new red fluorescence peak centered at around 620 nm appeared when the carbon quantum dots were mixed with ssRNA. This different interaction endowed the carbon quantum dots capability to discriminate DNA and RNA in nuclei and nucleoli by green and red fluorescence easily, respectively. Moreover, long-term imaging of chromatin and nucleoli during cell division and the growth of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) was also achieved.
Wu et al. reported the modification of carbon nanodots with catechol–borane moieties for the nucleus-targeted delivery of doxorubicin.108 The carbon nanodots were prepared by linking dopamine and 3-aminophenyl boronic acid with carboxylic CDs, which were denoted as p(CAT2-CD-BA1). The boronic acid on the outer shell of p(CAT2-CD-BA1) can bind to the glucosamine present in nucleoporin 62 (NUP62), which is the only glycoprotein existing in the inner ring of the NPC, endowing the CDs with nucleus-targeting ability. The authors also demonstrated that too much boronic acid modified on CDs over-interacted with the NUP62 gate and blocked the NPC channel.
Xu et al. conjugated a triphenylphosphonium (TPP) moiety and a photo-responsive NO donor on CDs to construct a mitochondria-targeted and NO-releasing nano-platform for cancer therapy.110 After cellular internalization, the nano-platform was distributed in the mitochondria and released NO, which caused high cytotoxicity towards cancer cells by specifically damaging their mitochondria. Wu et al. constructed a mitochondria-targeting nanoprobe by conjugating TPP on CDs obtained using o-phenylenediamine.29 This nanoprobe was sensitive to peroxynitrite and its fluorescence decayed via the photoinduced electron transfer (PET) mechanism with a limit of detection of 13.5 nM. Cellular experiments demonstrated that this nanoprobe provides a practical tool for imaging peroxynitrite in mitochondria. Zhang et al. prepared a nano micelle via the assembly of TPP-modified D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate (TPGS) and 1-hexadecylamine-capped CDs.34 The nano micelle delivered DOX to mitochondria, which overcame the multidrug resistance of cells and enhanced the treatment effect. Gong et al. developed a mitochondrial oxidative stress amplifier by modifying CDs supported by atomically dispersed gold with mitochondrion-targeting triphenylphosphine (TPP) and ROS-generating cinnamaldehyde (CA).111 Upon mitochondria localization guided by TPP, the dispersed gold depleted mitochondrial glutathione, and thus amplified the reactive oxygen species damage caused by CA.
Shen et al. developed mitochondria-targeting supra-CDs via the modification of mitochondria-targeting peptides on CDs prepared by heating citric acid and dicyandiamide.112 The mitochondria-targeting peptide (MLALLGWWWFFSRKKC) was conjugated with CDs covalently and endowed the CDs with mitochondria-targeting ability, which enhanced the photothermal therapy effect on cancer cells.
Zhou et al. pioneered the investigation of the uptake pathway of carbon dots in neural cells (Fig. 6A).114 They demonstrated the involvement of passive diffusion, caveolae-mediated, and clathrin-mediated pathways, and revealed the distribution of CDs mainly within endo–lysosomal structures, Golgi apparatus, and nucleus, respectively. They also noticed that a small number of CDs was dispersed in the ER and mitochondria. They addressed the decisive role of the ultrasmall size (1–5 nm) and positive charge (ca. +2.3 mV) of CDs on their uptake pathway.
![]() | ||
Fig. 6 (A) Schematic illustration of the uptake, intracellular trafficking and exocytosis of CDs in PC12 and RSC96 cells, reprinted with permission from ref. 114, Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Graphical description of the preparation, cellular endocytosis and localization in LoVo cells of CDs with different chemistry, reprinted with permission from ref. 47, Copyright 2021, the American Chemical Society. (C) Endocytosis pathway for CNPs in SH-SY5Y cells and a differentiated neuron, reprinted with permission from ref. 119, Copyright 2023, The Royal Society of Chemistry. |
We discovered that the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity and surface chemistry of CDs have significant effects on their uptake pathway and the final subcellular distribution. Hydrophilic CDs with surface amino groups could be internalized by cells mainly via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and located within the lysosome, while hydrophobic CDs decorated with laurylamine or short alkyl groups were internalized via caveolae-mediated endocytosis and membrane-penetrating passive diffusion and distributed in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).11,39 In a subsequent study, we designed four types of CDs with different surface chemistry and hydrophobicity, investigated their uptake pathway, and demonstrated their respective organelle-targeting feature (Fig. 6B).47 In this study, lipophilic ECDs and NCDs decorated with CH3 and C–O–C groups entered cells via a passive manner and localized in the ER and nucleus, amphiphilic GCDs with CH3, C–O–C and NH2 groups targeted the Golgi apparatus via caveolin-mediated endocytosis, while hydrophilic LCDs with CH3, NH2, and COOH preferred clathrin-mediated endocytosis and were distributed in the lysosome. These investigations proved the feasibility of organelle targeting by the design of surface chemistry and utilization of uptake pathways.
However, it should be noted that the uptake pathway of CDs by cells does not uniquely correspond to their organelles. For example, a combination of macropinocytosis-, clathrin-, caveolae-, and/or lipid raft-mediated pathways was identified in the internalization process of hydrophilic CDs that target the nucleolus.23 Besides, the lipid raft- and clathrin-mediated endocytosis pathways not only delivered hydrophobic CDs to the ER and lysosomes, but also transported hydrophobic CDs to lipid droplets.56,60 Nevertheless, a universal principle on the surface chemistry and uptake pathway by cells can be safely concluded, i.e., hydrophilic CDs with –NH2, –OH, and –COOH groups are usually internalized via the clathrin-mediated pathway, hydrophobic CDs with alkyl/phenazine groups are usually uptake via the caveolae-, lipid raft-mediated pathway or direct passive diffusion, while amphiphilic CDs can be internalized via both the clathrin- and caveolae-mediated pathways.114–117 A summary of the surface chemistry, uptake pathways, and subcellular locations of several organelle-targeting CDs is presented in Table 1.
Precursors | Surface groups | Uptake pathway | Subcellular location | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Citric acid and urea | –NH2 (ACDs), laurylamine (LCDs) | Clathrin-mediated (ACDs), clathrin- and lipid raft-mediated pathway (LCDs) | Lysosome (ACDs), endoplasmic reticulum (LCDs) | 11 |
m-Phenylenediamine and L-cysteine | –OH, –NH2, –COOH, and C–S | Macropinocytosis-, clathrin-, caveolae-, and/or lipid raft-mediated pathways | Nucleolus | 23 |
o-Phenylenediamine and lysine | CH3 (ECDs), C–O–C(NCDs), CH3, C–O–C and NH2 (GCDs), CH3, NH2 and COOH (LCDs) | Passive manner (ECDs, NCDs), caveolin-mediated pathway (GCDs), clathrin-mediated pathway (LCDs) | Endoplasmic reticulum (ECDs), nucleus (NCDs), Golgi apparatus (GCDs), lysosome (LCDs) | 47 |
o-Phenylenediamine and urine | NH2, alkyl groups | Lipid raft-mediated and caveolin-mediated pathway | Endoplasmic reticulum (ECDs) | 49 |
o-Phenylenediamine | Primary amine groups, phenazine structure | Lipid raft- and clathrin -mediated endocytosis | Lipid droplets | 56 |
3-Aminophenylboro-nic acid | –OH, B-OH, NH2 | Lipid raft-mediated endocytosis | Lipid droplets | 60 |
Citric acid and ethylenediamine | –OH, NH2 | Caveolae- and clathrin-mediated pathways, passive diffusion | Nucleus, endo–lysosomal structures and Golgi apparatus | 114 |
Grape seed extract | –OH, –COOH | Caveolae-and clathrin-mediated endocytosis | Nucleus | 115 |
o-Phenylenediamine and phenylalanine | Benzene ring, nitrogen heterocyclic ring, amino and hydroxyl | Passive diffusion | Endoplasmic reticulum | 116 |
Rose bengal and DL-cysteine | N–H, S–H | Clathrin- and lipid raft-mediated endocytosis | Endoplasmic reticulum | 117 |
Commercially acquired CDs | 3-Ethoxypropylamine, oligomeric polyethylenimine | Clathrin- and caveolae-mediated and pathways, macropinocytosis | Lysosome | 118 |
p-Phenylenediamine and diphenyl ether | NH2 | Clathrin-mediated | Lysosome | 119 |
Recently, in-depth research on the cellular pathway of CDs has emerged. Yan et al. investigated the effect of the surface functionalities of CDs on their endocytosis in different cell cycle phases.118 They used 3-ethoxypropylamine-functionalized CDs (EPA-CDots) and oligomeric polyethylenimine-functionalized (PEI-CDots) as models. The results showed that the HeLa cells internalized overall slightly more PEI-CDots. In the presence of serum, EPA-CDots were internalized mainly via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and caveolae-mediated endocytosis, which functioned only in the S phases. In the case of PEI-CDots, caveolae-mediated internalization and macropinocytosis were the major pathways. However, regardless of the endocytosis pathway, both CDs were localized in the lysosomes. Besides, Hivare et al. investigated the endocytic pathways of CDs in neuronal cells at different stages of differentiation (Fig. 6C).119 They employed red fluorescent CDs synthesized through the reflux reaction of p-phenylenediamine with diphenyl ether, which possessed an aromatic ring of carbon and C–NH2 groups. When incubated with SH-SY5Y-derived neuroblastoma neurons, the CDs were preferably taken up via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and targeted lysosomes in undifferentiated cells and differentiated cells at different stages. These investigations provide an in-depth understanding of the cellular uptake of CDs, but the targeting by the CDs was limited to lysosomes. Thus, the uptake of other organelle-targeting CDs by different cells or cells at different cell cycle phases needs more attention in the future.
In the case of intrinsic organelle-targeting CDs, the most significant issue is the reproducibility of their targeting feature. As elucidated above, there are examples on the synthesis of CDs using identical precursors under identical conditions, but CDs targeting different organelles were produced.11,26,95,102 In addition, many CDs are decorated with similar surface chemistry but target different organelles.13,69,72,96 Moreover, there are also investigations in which CDs prepared from different precursors and possessing different surface chemistry/charge, hydrophilicity, and size could target the same organelle.28,46,73,90,120 Thus, the organelle selectivity of intrinsic organelle-targeting CDs needs to be improved (Fig. 7A).71,121,122 These issues remind us that knowledge on CDs is far from sufficient to understand and explain these phenomena.
![]() | ||
Fig. 7 (A) Illustration of the synthesis of CDs that target mitochondria and lysosome simultaneously, reprinted with permission from ref. 71, Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd. (B) Schematic presentation of column separation of CDs, reprinted with permission from ref. 133, copyright 2019, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) Illustration of regulation of morphology of CDs and the improvement in their ER-targeting specificity, reprinted with permission from ref. 140, Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons. |
CDs do not possess definite structures and exact molecular weights. However, it is clear that CDs are usually composed of carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen elements, and some are doped with nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur, or other elements.10,123 Another consensus is that most CDs present a core–shell-like structure, and the composition and structure of their carbon core and surface group shell can be regulated by changing the precursors and reaction conditions.124,125 For a long time, researchers have devoted their efforts to producing various organelle-targeting CDs by regulating the precursors, optimizing the reaction conditions, and modifying CDs with specific moieties. However, there are various types of reactions between the precursors and these complex reactions lead to the production of multiple mixtures including carbon dots, unknown fluorescent molecules, or their combination, as well as other impurities and by-products.126,127–130 Thus, this complex composition may be the origin of the poor reproducibility of CDs, which make the rational design and precise preparation of CDs a difficult task. Considering this, the intrinsic targeting ability of one-pot prepared CDs seems to be a trial-error strategy to a certain degree. Notably, retrosynthesis methods in which the precursors were designed and the reactions between them were controlled made the intrinsic targeting CDs more precise and reliable.37,38 However, the retrosynthesis method is limited to mitochondria and particular precursors and suitable synthesis methods have not been explored in the synthesis of CDs targeting other organelles.
Rigorous purification by a combination of filtration, centrifugation, and dialysis with chromatography or gel electrophoresis can remove the by-products and obtain purified carbon dots with more reliable results.120,131–137 A typical example is the achievement of four different CDs targeting the ER, nucleus, Golgi apparatus, and lysosome from the purification of CDs using silica column chromatography and Sephadex.47 Separation of the one-pot synthesized CDs also provided evidence for the structure analysis and surface-state-controlled luminescence mechanism (Fig. 7B).133,135 To date, rigorous purification has been ranked as the most effective protocol to ensure the reproducibility of organelle-targeting CDs, which deserves to be popularized in the future.
In addition, new artificial intelligence methods such as machine learning may provide effective tools for the rational design of organelle-targeting CDs given that they assisted in the synthesis of CDs with predictable emission color and wavelength.138,139
In comparison with the intrinsic organelle-targeting strategy, the post-modification strategy avoids controversy through the use of specific targeting moieties, which helps to avoid the “trial-error” trap. However, specific targeting ligands change target sometimes. For example, the mitochondria-targeting ligand TPP endows CDs with a highly positive surface and facilitates the nucleoli imaging.21 Thus, the question arises whether can we use TPP to prepare nucleoli-targeting CDs? Besides, the post-modification strategy suffers from a lack of specific targeting moieties.
In summary, the reproducibility and specificity of the organelle-targeting ability of CDs need to be improved. Recently, Dr. E et al. reported an anion-directed strategy to control the morphology of fluorescent carbon nanoparticles from spherical to rod-shaped (Fig. 7C).140 All four types of carbon nanoparticles targeted the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), but their ER-targeting specificity was enhanced as their shape changed from spherical to higher-AR rods, accompanied by an increase in the Pearson correlation coefficient from 0.71 to 0.90. This investigation not only presented a new strategy to regulate the morphology of carbon dots, but also demonstrated that the morphology of CDs may be another breakthrough point to enhance their organelle-targeting specificity.
Usually, the targeting ability of CDs is attributed to their surface chemistry. However, the explanations for the targeting mechanism of functional groups are hardly consistent.143 For example, the weak alkaline or acidotropic effect of amino groups on the CDs was the most noted mechanism for lysosome-targeting CDs.44,69,144,145 However, the targeting ability of amine groups for lysosomes is not specific and amino-group-decorated CDs not only target lysosome, but also target the nucleus/nucleus77,79,146 and mitochondria,32,33,36 or target both lysosomes and mitochondria simultaneously.71 When CDs were observed to be located in the nucleus or mitochondria, the targeting mechanism was usually attributed to their surface positive charge or the combination of positive charge with appropriate lipophilicity.36,71,77,79,147 Although these proposed mechanisms can explain the experimental observation, there are still queries. For example, both the weak alkaline/acidotropic effect and the positive surface charges originated from the amino groups on the surface of CDs, but how can the amino groups selectively display different properties and locate in different organelles? If we need a type of nuclear-targeting CDs, should we consider amino group-decorated CDs? Moreover, there are investigations proving that CDs with negative surface charges can also target the nucleolus85,86 and mitochondria,148,149 which is inconsistent with the commonly recognized charges “repel and attract” principle. In summary, the explanations for the mechanism of the organelle-targeting ability of CDs are contradictory. Thus, new explanations need to be proposed.
There are multiple factors affecting the subcellular distribution of CDs, and although some of these factors have been investigated, some have been rarely noticed. One of the investigated factors is the cellular uptake pathway of CDs. When this factor was considered, rational and satisfactory explanations were proposed to explain why different CDs shared similar surface groups or charges but targeted different organelles.11,56,116 Besides, the uptake pathway of CDs was found to be dependent on their physical/chemical properties, such as surface chemistry, hydrophilicity, size, and charges.11,47,118 A raw principle can be addressed on the relationship between the physical/chemical properties and uptake pathways. However, the uptake pathway strategy does not result in specific organelle targeting sometimes. This is may be due to the fact that one endocytosis pathway can transport probes to several different organelles and the CDs can be internalized via several pathways simultaneously.23,75,117,150,151
In summary, reasonable targeting mechanisms have been proposed, especially when the uptake pathway was considered. However, there is still a long way to go to achieve consistent explanations for the targeting ability of CDs. To illustrate the targeting mechanism more clearly, we summarise the typical CDs targeting different organelles based on their raw materials and the targeting mechanism in Table 2.
Organelle | CDs | Raw materials | Targeting mechanism | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lysosome | ACDs | Citric acid monohydrate and urea | Clathrin-mediated endocytosis | 11 |
CDs | Citrate acid, ethylenediamine, and morpholine | Weak alkaline or acidotropic effect of morpholine groups | 41 | |
CDs-PEI-ML | CA, PEI, and morpholine | 42 | ||
CDs | Benzoquinone and ethylenediamine | Alkaline –NH2 groups | 44 | |
CDs | Dexamethasone and 1,2,4,5-tetraaminobenzene | 46 | ||
P-R CDs | Rose bengal and branched polyethyleneimine | 70 | ||
Mitochondria | CDs | Mercaptosuccinic acid, ethylenediamine, and chitosan | Lipophilicity and positive charges | 32 |
s-GQDs | Perylene tetracarboxylic anhydride and polyethylenimine | 36 | ||
APTMS CDs | Glycerol and silane | 33 | ||
N,S-CNDs | α-Lipoic acid, citric acid, and urea | Electronic interaction | 91 | |
C-dots-TPP | o-Phenylenediamine, TPP | lipophilicity and positive charges of TPP | 29 | |
MitoCAT-g | Citric acid, TPP | 111 | ||
SCDs | Citric acid and dicyandiamide | mitochondria-targeting peptides | 112 | |
Nuclear/Nucleolus | QCDs | Tris and betaine | Positive charge | 16 |
N-CDots | Dopamine | 19 | ||
Ni-pPCDs | p-Phenylenediamine/Ni2+ | 27 | ||
TAT-CDs | Bovine serum albumin and formic acid | Specific affinity of peptides | 20 | |
NLS-CDs | PEG-2000, CA, ethylenediamine, and NLS | 24 | ||
CDs | Ascorbic acid | Non-covalent interaction | 28 | |
HBIE-CDs | m-Phenylenediamine and folic acid | Hydrogen bonding | 86 | |
FCDs | Sodium hydroxide and polyethylene glycol | Protonation of oxygen groups | 87 | |
C-CD/TiO2 | Dopa-decyl | Zwitterionic surface | 88 | |
Golgi apparatus | LC-CQDs | Citrate acid and L-cysteine | Specific affinity of L-cysteine | 51 |
D/L-Pen-CDs | D/L-Penicillamine and citrate acid | Specific affinity of sulfonamide | 53 | |
GTCDs | p-Phenylenediamine and benzene sulfonamide | 54 | ||
Endoplasm reticulum | LCDs | Laurylamine, EDC·HCl and NHS | Caveolae-mediated endocytosis | 11 |
CD-MB | 4-MPBA, 4-CPBA, and 4-MBA | Positive charge, lipophilic surface, and boric acid groups | 50 | |
Lipid droplets | CDs | 3-Dimethylaminophenol | Lipophilicity, endocytosis pathway | 59 |
PA CDs | 4-Piperidinoaniline | 61 | ||
CDs | 2,6-Dibromo naphthalene dianhydride | 98 |
As demonstrated by previous investigations, most nanoparticles are dominantly internalized via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and are trafficked to lysosomes.113 Thus, lysosome escape of nanoparticles is vital to determine their intracellular trafficking and final subcellular locations. It can be speculated that some CDs target lysosomes due to their failed lysosome escape rather than their real lysosome targeting ability. This can also help to explain why some amino-group-surfaced CDs are located in lysosomes but CDs possessing similar surface groups enter the nucleus or are attached to mitochondria.
In this case, the appropriate design of the surface chemistry of nanoprobes can enable endosome/lysosome escape.152 Post modification with the NLS peptide is an efficient way to help CDs escape from lysosomes and target the nucleus, as illustrated in section 2.2.2.24 Besides, surface groups that are readily protonated in the lysosome can induce the entry of excess water and splitting of the lysosome, and subsequently the CDs can escape from the lysosome.153 Besides, the lysosome escape of CDs is cell-line dependent. The design of the surface chemistry can also avoid non-clathrin-mediated endocytosis, bypass endosomal trafficking, and target different subcellular organelles.152 The preparation of CDs with amphiphilicity, lipophilicity, or hydrophobicity enables their caveolae/lipid raft-mediated endocytosis and passive diffusion, which makes CDs target mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, and lipid drops.11,47,49,56,60,114–119
The molecules on the cell membrane can be used to construct the surface chemistry of CDs. Nasrin reported the synthesis of folic acid fragment-decorated CDs, which were combined with a folate receptor and glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol (GPI) anchor to form a hybrid. After entering the cells, the hybrid was involved in endosomal transport and cleaved by lysosomal action by GPI. Subsequently, the CDs were released around the nucleus, where they penetrated the nucleus through nuclear pore complexes.151
Recently, the migration of CDs between organelles has been investigated. Guo et al. observed the migration of CDs between mitochondria and nucleolus when the mitochondria membrane potential (MMP) changed. The CDs migrated from the mitochondria to nucleolus when the MMP increased, and returned to the mitochondria when the MMP recovered.95 Gao et al. tracked lipid droplet dynamics by using amphiphilic carbon dots and found that LDs with green fluorescence (emitted by CDs) gradually accumulated on the mitochondria during starvation.58 Considering that organelle-organelle interactions are essential for maintaining intracellular homeostasis,154 these special discoveries may initiate new insight into understanding the transport of matter between organelles.
It can be seen that intracellular transport investigations produced more results on how to enhance the lysosomal escape or avoid the clathrin-mediated pathway. However, the transport process after internalization via non-clathrin pathways needs further investigations to determine the real intracellular fate of CDs.
The necessity to study the interactions between CDs and intracellular molecules has been demonstrated by several previous reports.
As is known, triphenylphosphonium (TPP) is a widely used reagent to endow nanoparticles with mitochondria-targeting feature and mitochondria-targeting CDs can be feasibly prepared by modification with TPP.23,34,110,111 The targeting ability is usually attributed to the electrostatic interaction between the highly positive surface of CDs induced by TPP and the highly negative surface of the membrane of mitochondria. However, the electrostatic interaction is not specific and the highly positive surface theoretically endows CDs interaction with the negative membranes of other organelles. Nevertheless, there are rare reports in which TPP-modified CDs targeted the endoplasmic reticulum, lysosome, Golgi apparatus, or lipid droplets. Therefore, we think it is better to reconsider the targeting mechanism of TPP-modified CDs by identifying the specific molecules functioning in the mitochondria-targeting process. Recently, an innovative study demonstrated the targeting imaging of nucleic acid structures rather than mitochondria by using TPP-modified CDs,21 in which the specific affinity of TPP towards DNA and RNA was evidenced solidly by experimental results. This study demonstrated that the interaction between CDs and DNA/RNA endowed TPP-CDs nucleus-targeting ability, which elucidated the targeting mechanism without any doubts. This example proved the significance of investigating the interactions between CDs and intracellular molecules.
Both DNA and RNA are polyanions and exhibit negative features in normal intracellular physiological circumstances. Theoretically, CDs with positive surfaces rather than negative surfaces target the nucleus easily due to their interaction with DNA or RNA.16,19,27,77–84 However, several investigations demonstrated that negatively charged CDs can also target the nucleus/nucleolus.22,23,28,85–87 Non-covalent interactions28 and hydrogen bonding87 with DNA/RNA were proposed to explain the targeting mechanism of CDs. Besides, the interaction between oxygen group-modified CDs and alkaline chromatin was also attributed to the reason for their nucleus-targeting ability.88 Although CDs mostly exhibit unspecific interactions with intracellular molecules, which result in artifacts, the study on these interactions is beneficial for the elucidation of their targeting mechanism.
Nevertheless, the active molecules in the endoplasmic reticulum, lysosome, Golgi apparatus, lipid droplets, and other subcellular structures have not been revealed, which need more attention and may become a potential field of study. Besides, active biomolecules functioning in the endocytosis process and the intracellular transport can also provide evidence for the subcellular targeting of CDs. To carry out related investigations, knowledge of molecular biology and cell biology should be emphasized and related investigation methods should be introduced.
Recently, super-resolution imaging of subcellular organelles using CDs as fluorescence probes produced interesting results. Hua et al. reported the super-resolution imaging of the nucleolus with a spatial resolution of 146–172 nm using red-emitting CDs, which presented a clearer nucleolus structure than conventional confocal imaging.27 In another report, He et al. designed CDs integrated with fluorescent blinking domains and RNA-binding motifs, which achieved super-resolution imaging of the nucleolar ultrastructure. The authors used the CD-depicted nucleolar ultrastructure as a hallmark to distinguish different cell types accurately and identify subtle responses to various stressors (Fig. 8A).134 In addition, by using stimulated emission depletion microscopy and endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-targeting CDs, Li observed the dynamic process of ER from loosely spaced tubes in a continuously dense network of tubules and sheets during cell division (Fig. 8B).116 They also found that the ER can contact with almost every other organelle.
![]() | ||
Fig. 8 (A) Illustration of the preparation of ER-targeting CDs and confocal and STED images of ER, reprinted with permission of ref. 116, Copyright 2022, The Royal Chemistry Society. (B) Schematic illustration of the structures of RBP- and N-CDs and STORM images of nucleolus structure of different cell lines, reprinted with permission of ref. 134, Copyright 2021, the American Chemical Society. |
However, although some remarkable progress has been made in the application of CDs in super-resolution imaging, there are still great limitations, such as the aggregation and nonspecific binding of CDs, which may lead to artifacts.160 Besides, super-resolution imaging is expensive, which hinders its wide application. Therefore, designing the surface chemistry of CDs and developing new super-resolution imaging techniques to reduce the cost need more attentions. In summary, super-resolution microscopy can provide more details in organelle imaging with CDs as probes and help to understand the intracellular fate of CDs, but related investigations are still in their infancy.
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2024 |