Organelle imaging with carbon dots: strategies, challenges, and perspectives

Quanxing Mao a, Yujie Meng a, Yuhang Feng a, Hui Li *b and Tianyi Ma *b
aCollege of Chemistry, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China
bSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia. E-mail: tianyi.ma@rmit.edu.au; hui.li2@rmit.edu.au

Received 19th October 2023 , Accepted 1st December 2023

First published on 4th December 2023


Abstract

Organelle imaging is an efficient approach to gain information about intracellular events and dynamics of subcellular structures. In this case, carbon dots (CDs) are outstanding fluorescent probes for organelle imaging due to their excellent biocompatibility, tunable and stable fluorescence, anti-photobleaching, and easy and cheap preparation. In the past decade, numerous investigations have made great progress in regulating the physicochemical properties of CDs for targeted organelle imaging. However, there are several obstacles that hinder the further understanding of subcellular events, such as the unsatisfactory organelle specificity of CDs and their inconsistent organelle-targeting mechanism. In addition, researchers have focused on how to produce organelle-targeting CDs but ignored the fact that cells and organelles also affect the subcellular distribution of CDs. Thus, in this review, we outline the development in the field of organelle-targeting imaging using CDs as probes, summarize the general strategies for targeted imaging using CDs, discuss the challenges in this field, and propose potential solutions. We hope that this review will facilitate the further development of organelle imaging using CDs as probes.


1. Introduction

Most eukaryotic cells contain a nucleus, lysosomes, Golgi apparatus, and other organelles, where biochemical reactions occur to keep cells alive. Accordingly, if one of these organelles is damaged and the related reactions are abnormal, the cell becomes apoptotic and diseases occur.1 In this case, the visualization of the individual compartments and reactions in different organelles or subcellular structures facilitates the further understanding of the cell status, metabolism, functionality, diseases and treatments,2,3 where fluorescence probes are vital tools to achieve visualization or imaging. To date, several types of fluorescent probes, such as organic dyes, fluorescent proteins, and fluorescent nanoparticles, have been developed and employed for the visualization of cells.4–7 However, the photobleaching of organic dyes, the complicated synthetic procedure for fluorescence proteins, the toxicity of semiconductor quantum dots, the high cost of upconversion nanoparticles, and other drawbacks make it necessary to develop new organelle imaging probes to avoid these disadvantages.

Carbon dots (CDs) show great potential application in the fluorescence imaging of organelles due their favourable fluorescence, high photo- and chemical-stability, excellent biocompatibility, low toxicity, easy preparation, tunable organelle targeting, and high resolution.8–11 Wang12 and Yang13 were the first researchers to observe that CDs are distributed mainly in the cytoplasm. Li investigated the distribution of CDs in HeLa, SMCC-7721, and HEK293 cells using fluorescence images and TEM images and found similar results.14 Karthik first reported that quinolone-tethered CDs were distributed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus.15 Datta prepared cationic quaternized CDs that could label the cell nucleus and reported that the distribution of CDs could be regulated by combining them with anionic graphene oxide.16 Since then, increasing research has focused on imaging the nucleus and nucleolus using different carbon dots.17–28 Meanwhile, the fluorescence imaging of the mitochondrion,29–38 lysosome,39–46 endoplasm reticulum,47–50 Golgi apparatus51–55 and lipid drops56–61 using CDs has also witnessed great developments. Recent reviews summarized the progress in individual organelle imaging, highlighting the properties, precursors, and sensing applications of CDs.62–64 However, to date, there are still no straightforward strategies for organelle targeting using CDs, the interactions between CDs and organelles are not clear, and the organelle-targeting mechanism of CDs is controversial. Furthermore, a review addressing these issues is still lacking.

In this review, we focus on the key issues associated with the use of CDs as organelle imaging probes. Initially, we summarize the general strategies for organelle imaging using CDs, including the intrinsic targeting ability of one-pot CDs, post-modification with specific species, and uptake pathways of CDs. Then, we outline the challenges in preparing “ideal” CDs probes and investigating their targeting mechanism, including their unsatisfactory organelle specificity and lack of CDs targeting less-concerned organelles. Subsequently, we suggest potential solutions, where we highlight the purification and intracellular transport of CDs, the interaction between CDs and intracellular molecules, and the super-resolution imaging techniques.

2. The general strategies for organelle targeting

Various studies have demonstrated that the size,15 hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity,11 functional groups,42 surface charge,65 and chirality51 of CDs are vital for their subcellular distribution. However, there is still a lack of information on how to achieve specific organelle targeting. Besides, clear and consistent elucidation of the organelle-targeting mechanism of CDs is still challenging. Herein, we summarize the generally used strategies for organelle targeting using CDs, which mainly include intrinsic organelle targeting, post-modification with specific species, and use of the uptake pathway. We believe that this summary will provide readers with an updated understanding of the regular patterns in the targeting feature of CDs.

2.1 Intrinsic organelle-targeting CDs

Some carbon dots (CDs) without special post-modification can target certain organelles naturally, which are defined as intrinsic organelle-targeting CDs. Generally, their targeting ability is attributed to the surface groups, zeta potential, hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity, and other physical/chemical properties of CDs. One-pot-prepared CDs usually inherit some specific properties of their precursors,47,63,66 and thus rationally selected precursors that can interact with specific organelles are vital to ensure the intrinsic organelle-targeting ability of CDs. The current widely used precursors can be classified into two categories, i.e., unspecific precursors without targeting nature and specific precursors with targeting features for certain organelles. Both types of precursors can produce CDs with intrinsic targeting ability.
2.1.1 CDs generated from unspecific precursors.
2.1.1.1 Lysosome targeting CDs. Typical examples of CDs prepared using unspecific precursors are lysosome-targeting CDs. The lysosome is the digestion organelle of the cell and contains abundant protons to maintain a low pH value, maintaining the activity of digestion enzymes. Imaging of the lysosome is beneficial to understand living processes such as autophagy, the digestion of external nutrient substances and generation of endogenous waste. Amino groups easily bind with protons, which is regarded as the weak alkaline or acidotropic effect of amino groups. Thus, the enriched amino groups on the surface of CDs are believed to be responsible for their lysosome-targeting ability. Ethanediamine,44 tetraaminobenzene,46 triethylenetetramine,67 dopamine, 1,2-diaminobenzene,68 spermine69 and other amino-containing precursors have been successfully used to prepare amino-containing CDs to achieve lysosome-targeting ability. Huang's group proposed a functional preservation strategy (Fig. 1A) to prepare CDs at ambient temperature to avoid their decomposition and preserve the functional groups of the starting materials.44 By simply mixing p-benzoquinone and ethylenediamine, the spontaneous exothermal reaction provided appropriate heat to form CDs and create rich amine groups on the CDs, facilitating lysosome-targeted imaging. This strategy is energy-saving. However, spontaneous exothermal reactions occur with limited precursors and the majority of precursors require high temperature to form CDs. Liu et al. prepared CDs by reacting dexamethasone and 1,2,4,5-tetraaminobenzene at 160 °C via a microwave-assisted hydrothermal method.46 The as-prepared CDs were enriched with amine groups and could target lysosomes due to the acidotropic effect. Tong reported the synthesis of NH2 group-functionalized CDs for long-term lysosome imaging by treating rose bengal and branched polyethyleneimine at 160 °C.70 Similar methods can also be applied to prepare lysosome-targeting CDs by heating amino-containing starting materials at high temperature (130 °C–160 °C), and their targeting ability is attributed to the weak alkaline or acidotropic effect of the amino groups on their surface.67,69,71,72 The typical process for the preparation of intrinsic lysosome-targeting CDs and lysosome imaging is presented in Fig. 1B and C, respectively.
image file: d3qi02145a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (A) Schematic representation of functional preservation strategy to prepare lysosome-targeting CDs and imaging of lysosomal pH, reprinted with permission from ref. 44, Copyright 2018, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Confocal fluorescence images of MCF-7 cells treated with CDs prepared from spermine and rose bengal, reprinted with permission from ref. 69, Copyright 2021, Elsevier Ltd. (C) Schematic illustration of the preparation of lysosome-targeting CDs and their application in the detection of FA, reprinted with permission from ref. 46, Copyright 2019, The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Recently, Singh et al. obtained lysosome-targeting CDs by hydrothermal treating extracts of neem plant roots without clear identification of their composition. The authors speculated that the appropriate lipophilicity induced by the –COOH, C–O–C, and amino functionalities on the surface helped to achieve specific lysosomal localization.73 A similar result was reported in another study, in which CDs with moderate lipophilicity were prepared via the hydrothermal carbonization of chloranil and triethylenetetramine, which targeted lysosomes within 30 min.74 Zhi purified the raw products from the hydrothermal treatment of citric acid and urea in formamide with a C18 reversed-phase column and obtained blue-emitting CDs (CD-B) and red-emitting CDs (CD-R), which targeted lysosomes/mitochondria and only lysosomes, respectively. The authors proposed that the difference in the hydrodynamic size of the CDs was responsible for the difference in their localization.75 These studies show some inconsistencies with respect to the structure–activity relationship of lysosome-targeting CDs, but may also open up more potential ways to prepare lysosome-targeting CDs.


2.1.1.2 Nucleus- or nucleolus-targeting CDs. The nucleus or nucleolus contains genetic DNA, RNA and functional proteins, which are the control center of the cell. Nucleus- or nucleolus-targeting CDs can also be generated from unspecific precursors. The most characteristic substances in the nucleus and nucleolus are DNA and RNA, which are complex macromolecules with negative charges. Accordingly, CDs with highly positive charges originating from various organic amine molecules have been successfully prepared and used for nucleus/nucleolus imaging.

Datta obtained cationic quaternized carbon dots by heating a mixture of tris and betaine, which possessed a zeta potential as high as +53 mV.16 The strong positive charge facilitated the interaction between the CDs and DNA/RNA, resulting in the localization of the CDs in the nucleus. Several later studies also reported the preparation of nucleus/nucleolus-targeting CDs with positive-charged surfaces using dopamine/ethylenediamine,19p-phenylenediamine/Ni2+,27 1,5-diaminonaphthalene,76 citric acid/PEI,77m-phenylenediamine/p-aminobenzoic acid,78 and m-phenylenediamine/aminourea hydrochloride.79 The interaction between CDs and DNA/RNA was identified by enzymolysis experiments, in which CDs could stain only the nucleus or nucleolus after the cells were treated with RNase or DNase.27,80–83

Interestingly, negatively charged CDs can also interact with DNA/RNA and target the nucleus/nucleolus.22,23,28,84,85 Hua et al. attributed the RNA affinity to the specific surface chemistry of the CDs (Fig. 2A).23 Li suggested that there is non-covalent interaction between the negatively charged CDs and nucleic acid because of the increase in fluorescence upon the addition of DNA or RNA.28 Liu proposed that the hydrogen bonding of the CDs with DNA/RNA facilitated the nuclear targeting (Fig. 2B).86 Given that hydroxyl/carboxyl groups commonly remain on the surface of CDs, we believe that the hydrogen bonding explanation is more reasonable. Kong suggested that the protonation of the oxygen groups in CDs facilitates their interaction with the alkaline chromatin, which may result in their nucleus-targeting ability.87 Besides positively/negatively charged CDs, zwitterionic CDs can also target the nucleus or nucleolus due to their zwitterionic surface.18,25,88 It is noteworthy that most of these investigations addressed the importance of small-size CDs for nuclear targeting because large CDs would be excluded by the nuclear pore complex.


image file: d3qi02145a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of CDs for nucleus imaging and the interaction between CDs and DNA, reprinted with permission from ref. 23, Copyright 2018, the American Chemical Society. (B) Presentation of the preparation of negative-charged CDs with intrinsic nuclear imaging ability due to the hydrogen bond, reprinted with permission from ref. 86, Copyright 2019, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) Schematic illustration of the preparation of nucleus-targeting CDs and their application in multiple cell lines, reprinted with permission from Ref. 82, Copyright 2022, Elsevier Ltd. (D) Illustration of the preparation of nucleus-targeting CDs from biomass, reprinted with permission from ref. 90, Copyright 2020, the American Chemical Society.

Different from the above-mentioned studies in which CDs were obtained at high temperatures, Choi et al. prepared a type of nucleus-targeting CDs at room temperature via an acid-assisted carbonization method by treating the product of C/C12-PEG-g-PDMA and 1,3-propane sultone.89 The surface of the obtained CDs contained zwitterionic dodecane/sulfobetaine groups. The response to a variation in pH by these zwitterionic groups facilitated the transportation of the CDs from the cytosol to the nucleus in cancer cells, but not in normal cells. Therefore, it is promising to develop a cancer diagnostic tool that can differentiate normal cells from cancer cells using these CDs.

Besides organic molecules, natural materials without certain structures such as hydrogenated rosin could also be used to produce nucleus-localized CDs (Fig. 2D).90 The CDs could be used to detect Fe3+ with a detection limit of 6.16 μM.


2.1.1.3 Mitochondria-targeting CDs. Mitochondria are dual-layer-phospholipid-membrane organelles with a highly negative membrane potential (mitochondria membrane potential, MMP), where ATP is generated to provide energy for multiple processes, such as cell division and signal transduction. A widely validated targeting mechanism for mitochondria is the electronic interaction between mitochondria and probes.

Wu's group prepared mitochondrial-targeting CDs via the one-step hydrothermal treatment of mercaptosuccinic acid, ethylenediamine, and chitosan.32 The intrinsic mitochondria-targeting ability was attributed to the sufficient delocalization, lipophilicity, and positive charges of the CDs. The CDs were used to achieve mitochondria-targeted photodynamic therapy (Fig. 3A).32 They also reported the preparation of CDs using glycerol and silane to target mitochondria due to the presence of cationic species on the CDs. The CDs were responsive to polarity, and thus used to differentiate cancerous cells from normal cells.33 In another study, mitochondria-targeting single-layered graphene quantum dots (sGQDs) were prepared via the hydrothermal treatment of perylene tetracarboxylic anhydride and polyethylenimine.36 The sGQDs localized in the mitochondria selectively and the positive charges and lipophilic features of sGQDs were responsible for the organelle targeting. Several subsequent studies also attributed the intrinsic targeting ability of CDs to their positive surface charges and the electronic interaction between CDs and mitochondria (Fig. 3B).91–94 However, it is noteworthy that this electronic interaction mechanism is not specific. CDs with positive charges on their surface can be localized in mitochondria and endoplasm reticulum, or mitochondria and nucleolus, simultaneously.71,95,96 Besides, negatively charged CDs decorated with citric acid could also target mitochondria, which was driven by the affinity between citric acid and mitochondria.97 If this affinity can be validated widely, there will be another approach towards intrinsic mitochondria-targeting CDs.


image file: d3qi02145a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (A) Schematic illustrating the synthetic route of CDs and their applications as a fluorescent mitochondrial-tracker, reprinted with permission from ref. 32, Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Preparation of self-targeting CQDs and their application for mitochondrial ONOO imaging, reprinted with permission from ref. 93, Copyright 2021, the American Chemical Society. (C) Dynamic lipid droplet coalescence observed from fluorescent imaging results with CDs as probes, reprinted with permission from ref. 99, Copyright 2023, Elsevier Ltd. (D) CLSM images of co-localization with different organelles from an ER-targeting CDs, reprinted with permission from ref. 100, Copyright 2020, The Royal Society of Chemistry.

2.1.1.4 Lipid droplet- and endoplasmic reticulum-targeting CDs. Lipid droplets (LD) are the storage organelles of neutralized lipids, while the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the location for the synthesis of proteins and all types of lipids. Thus, targeting lipid droplets and the endoplasmic reticulum can facilitate the understanding of the synthesis and metabolism of lipids and proteins. Both LD and ER are highly lipophilic. Therefore, CDs prepared from hydrophobic materials and are lipophilic to some extent are expected to be LD-targeting and ER-targeting.

Liu prepared two novel types of amphiphilic LD-targeting CDs via the one-step treatment of o-phenylenediamine at room temperature and 200 °C.56 The CDs achieved long-term tracking of LDs, and thus were successfully applied for the real-time monitoring of lipid catabolism and pharmacodynamic evaluation of lipid-lowering drugs. Wang prepared LD-targeting CDs via the hydrothermal treatment of 4-piperidinoaniline at 160 °C in ethanol.61 After a comparative experiment with commercial LD-targeting dyes (Nile red and BODIPY 493/503), the authors revealed that the targeting ability of the CDs for LD can be attributed to their high lipophilicity. Other subsequent investigations also proved this lipophilicity targeting mechanism by using CDs prepared from 3-dimethylaminophenol,59 2,6-dibromo naphthalene dianhydride in ethylene glycol,98 mixture of 1,2-diamino-4-fluorobenzene and thiourea in N,N-dimethylformamide,58 and mixture of o-phenylenediamine and thiourea in N,N-dimethylformamide.99 Gao et al. demonstrated the formation of a D–π–A structure via the Schiff base reaction between phenylenediamine and N,N-dimethylformamide, which are important precursors for the formation of LD-targeting CDs.58 They also suggested that the lipophilic CH3 group on the CDs played a vital role in determining the location of the as-prepared CDs in LD. By using the LD-targeting CDs, they observed the LD coalescence dynamics (Fig. 3C).99

In contrast, fewer intrinsic ER-targeting CDs have been reported. In our previous investigations, two types of ER-targeting CDs were obtained via the hydrothermal treatment of mixtures of o-phenylenediamine and lysine/urea.49,100 The co-localization studies proved the high specificity of the CDs towards ER (Fig. 3D).100 Wu et al.50 synthesized CDs via a facile one-pot hydrothermal method without additional modification, which possessed a positive charge, lipophilic surface, and boric acid groups, which endowed the CDs with two-stage cascade recognition ability for the endoplasmic reticulum. Wu101 obtained CDsomesmemvia the liquid–liquid extraction in butanol/water of the crude products from heating triolein at 220 °C for 3 days. The CDsomesmem formed liposome-like structures and were distributed in the ER and other membrane systems due to their lipophilicity.

2.1.2 CDs generated from specific precursors. As elucidated above, numerous have demonstrated that organelle-targeting CDs can be achieved by treating unspecific precursors. However, the organelle-targeting results are not always reliable. For example, treating citric acid and N,N-dimethylaniline at 160 °C for 10 h produced CDs targeting lysosomes,102 whereas treating the same precursors under the identical conditions produced CDs targeting mitochondria and nucleolus in another study.95 This inconsistent organelle-targeting can also be found for CDs produced from citric acid and urea.11,26 Thus, due to the fact that CDs inherit their properties from their precursors, the preparation of CDs using precursors with specific affinity to certain organelles provides organelle-targeting results that are more reliable.

A typical example of this strategy is the generation of Golgi-apparatus-targeting CDs. According to previous reviews, the widely recognized targeting groups for the Golgi apparatus include norrisolide, phenyl sulfonamide, L-cysteine, kapakahines, bovine serum albumin-dyes complex, 7-aminoquinolines, and sphingolipids.103 Huang's group51 reported the preparation of Golgi-targeting CDs from citrate acid and L-cysteine and demonstrated that L-cysteine remaining on the surface of the CDs combined with the sulfhydryl receptor site of the Golgi apparatus, which was the origin of their specificity towards the Golgi apparatus (Fig. 4A). They also achieved the precise delivery of ricin A-chain using the as-prepared Golgi-targeting CDs.55 Penicillamine contains a similar structure to L-cysteine, and CDs prepared from D/L-penicillamine and citrate acid targeted the Golgi apparatus specifically.53 Benzene sulfonamide has a selective affinity for cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), which is one of the signature proteins of the Golgi apparatus.103 Thus, CDs generated from benzene sulfonamide and p-phenylenediamine could be used for the selective imaging of the Golgi apparatus via the specific affinity for COX-2.54


image file: d3qi02145a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (A) Synthetic route of L-cysteine-rich chiral carbon quantum dots (LC-CQDs) and the Golgi imaging results, reprinted with permission from ref. 51, Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Schematic illustration of the preparation of CD-MB with boronic acid groups on its surface and its ER-targeting ability via a two-stage cascade ER recognition process, reprinted with permission from ref. 50, Copyright 2022, the American Chemical Society. (C) Illustration of preparation of lysosome-targeting CDs from citric acid and N,N-dimethylaniline, reprinted with permission from ref. 102, Copyright 2020, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (D) Schematic presentation of mitochondrial-targeting CDs from TPP, reprinted with permission from ref. 106, Copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons. (E) Retrosynthesis of mitochondria-targeting CDs and mitophagy tracking, reprinted with permission from ref. 38, Copyright 2019, the American Chemical Society.

Another example illustrating this strategy is the dynamic visualization of endoplasmic reticulum stress in living cells using ER-targeting CDs prepared from 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid and ethylenediamine (Fig. 4B).50 Boric acid groups can selectively connect with the o-dihydroxy group of mannose in the ER cavity, and thereby the as-prepared CDs achieved specific targeting of the ER. It should be noted that the positively charged and lipophilic surface of the CDs facilitated their accumulation in the ER, which also played an indispensable role.

In the case of lysosomes, the typical targeting groups are morpholine and N,N-dimethyl groups.104 Li's group selected N,N-dimethylaniline and citric acid as precursors to prepare CDs and successfully obtained intrinsic lysosomal-targeting CDs with ultra-stability for long-term imaging (Fig. 4C).102 The as-prepared CDs localized in lysosomes in different cell lines such as HepG2, HL-7702, and 3T3 cells. By employing the photo-stability and long-term co-localization performance of the CDs, they achieved the tracking of lysosome movements under the stimulation of chloroquine.

Thiazole orange is a specific DNA/RNA-targeting dye. Yin et al. prepared nucleolus-targeting CDs by heating 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde and 2,3-dimethylbenzothiazole iodide in a microwave reactor, in which the precursors contained thiazole groups.105 The CDs showed selective affinity towards RNA, and thus localized in the nucleolus specifically. Besides, the small particle size and polarity response behaviour of the CDs realized fast nucleolus imaging effectively.

The use of triphenylphosphonium (TPP) as a precursor can ensure the achievement of mitochondrion-targeting CDs in most cases. Rajendran et al. employed a simple one-step carbonization method using TPP and PEG-di-NH2 as carbon precursors and surface passivation reagent, respectively (Fig. 4D).106 The TPP molecules carbonized and formed the CDs, while the amine groups of PEG-di-NH2 attached or absorbed on the surface of the CDs to endow them with water dispersibility and enhance their fluorescence. Incubation with prostate cancer (PC-3), colon cancer (HCT116), neuroblastoma (SHSY5Y), and cervical cancer (HeLa) cells confirmed the mitochondrion-targeting ability of the CDs. The TPP moieties remained on the surface of the CDs, facilitating the labeling of mitochondria. Furthermore, the polarity and high lipophilicity of the residual TPP imparted excellent penetration in the mitochondrial intermembrane potential barrier.

Notably, Li's group modified the concept of retrosynthesis from organic chemistry to fabricate mitochondrion-specific CDs.37 In their design of the synthetic route, citric acid and m-aminophenol formed a rhodamine structure, which served as both the mitochondria-targeting unit and luminescent center. They prepared mitochondria-tracking CDs (MitoTCD) from citric acid and m-aminophenol through microwave irradiation. By changing the substituent groups of m-aminophenol, several MitoTCDs with different fluorescence emissions and quantum yields were achieved. Employing the same strategy, they used citric acid and 8-hydroxyjulolidine to synthesize rhodamine-like fluorophores, which were further polymerized and carbonized to form another type of mitochondrion-specific CDs (Fig. 4E).38 Although the organelle-targeting CDs prepared from specific precursors provide results that are more reliable, these studies are much less than that generated by unspecific precursors, which may hold great potential for developing organelle-targeting CDs.

2.2 Post modification with specific targeting species

Several molecules or groups are widely recognized as organelle-targeting species. For instance, morpholine is a targeting molecule for lysosomes and triphenyl phosphine is the most used group to construct mitochondrion-targeting probes.2 Thus, post modification with these specific targeting species endows CDs specific targeting ability towards certain organelles. This post-modification strategy seems to provide the most reliable organelle-targeting results because the specific targeting species exist without any doubt.
2.2.1 Lysosome-targeting CDs. Xiang et al. reported the two-step post-modification of CDs to generate a lysosome-targeting nano-platform for the delivery of nitric oxide and photothermal therapy.40 They prepared CDs decorated with carboxyl groups, followed by the first post-modification with ethylenediamine and second post-modification with morpholine-functionalized Ru complex and folic acid via covalent coupling. The distribution of the functionalized CDs matched well with that of Lyso-Tracker Red in HeLa cells with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.93. Meanwhile, in the contrast experiment in which the CDs were modified with the Ru complex without morpholine groups, they were randomly distributed in the cytoplasm and the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.50. Subsequently, the delivery of nitric oxide and photothermal therapy of cancer cells were realized using the lysosome-targeting nano-platform.

He et al. simplified the procedures to prepare lysosome-targeting CDs.41 Initially, they prepared amino group-functionalized CDs via a one-pot method by heating a mixture of citrate acid and ethylenediamine rather than modifying carboxylated CDs with ethylenediamine. Subsequently, morpholine was covalently modified on the surface of the CDs to endow them with lysosome-targeting ability. Combining the fluorescence response of the 1,8-naphthalimide derivative to H+, the pH variation in the lysosome was tracked via fluorescence imaging.

In another investigation, Wu et al. prepared two types of lysosome-targeting CDs, i.e., CDs-MP and CDs-PEI-ML (Fig. 5A).42 CDs-MP was prepared by modifying aminating morpholine on the surface of carboxylic CDs, which were synthesized via the hydrothermal treatment of citrate acid. Alternatively, CDs-PEI-ML was prepared by modifying carboxylic morpholine on the surface of aminated CDs, which were synthesized via the hydrothermal treatment of a mixture of citrate acid and PEI. Both CDs-MP and CDs-PEI-ML targeted lysosomes with high specificity, high photostability, and low cytotoxicity. However, CDs-PEI-ML showed a 4-fold higher fluorescence intensity than CDs-MP, which indicates that CDs-PEI-ML is a more suitable fluorescent probe for lysosome imaging.


image file: d3qi02145a-f5.tif
Fig. 5 (A) Illustration of preparation of lysosome-targeting CDs via modification with 4-(2-aminoethyl) morpholine, reprinted with permission from ref. 42, Copyright 2017, the American Chemical Society. (B) Design of lysosome-targeting ratiometric probe based on CDs, reprinted with permission from ref. 45, Copyright 2019, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) Illustration of the possible process for endocytosis and localization of NLS-CD complex in the nucleus, reprinted with permission from ref. 24, Copyright 2015, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (D) Presentation of the synthesis of mitochondrial-targeting CDs via modification with TPP and the subcellular localization of TPP-CDs and non-targeting CDs colocalized with MitoTracker Deep Red, reprinted with permission from ref. 65, Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Zhang et al. synthesized nanohybrid Ru1@CDs by modifying an Ru(II) complex (Ru1) on CDs.43 Initially, they prepared intrinsic lysosome-targeting Ru1 and CDs, and then combined them via a simple condensation reaction using EDC and NHS as coupling agents. According to the colocalization experiments of Ru1@CDs, CDs, or Ru1 with commercial lysosome-targeting dyes (LTDR), the colocalization coefficients of Ru1@CDs, CDs, and Ru1 with LTDR were 0.88, 0.86, and 0.85, respectively. This demonstrated that Ru1@CDs, CDs, and Ru1 can specifically image lysosome. However, the photodynamic therapy results indicated that Ru1@CDs possessed higher potency of being an efficient agent for PDT treatment of cancer.

Chen et al. reported the synthesis of naphthalimide derivative-functionalized CDs (CDs-ND) for imaging formaldehyde in the lysosome (Fig. 5B).45 They prepared the CDs by heating methionine and citric acid and obtained CDs-ND by covalently modifying the naphthalimide derivative on CDs. The colocalization experiment of CDs-ND with Lyso-Tracker Deep Red demonstrated the excellent lysosome-targeting ability of CDs-ND with a high Pearson colocalization coefficient of 0.93. Alternatively, CDs and ND only exhibited low Pearson colocalization coefficients of 0.46 and 0.56, respectively. The confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging results showed that the fluorescence signal of CDs-ND in HeLa cells responded to the content of formaldehyde in the lysosome, indicating the that CDs-ND is a favorable probe for monitoring the endogenous formaldehyde in living systems.

2.2.2 Nucleus- or nucleolus-targeting targeting. Besides the most important genetic molecules DNA and RNA in the nucleus, there are also active biomolecules in the nuclear pore complex (NPC), which may provide interaction sites for nucleus-targeting probes.

Yang proposed a nuclear localization signal (NLS) peptide-decorated CD conjugate to achieve targeted nucleus staining (Fig. 5C).24 Initially, CD@PEG was prepared via the hydrothermal treatment of a mixture of PEG-2000, citrate acid and ethylenediamine at 160 °C for 8 h. Subsequently, NLS (PKKKRKVG) was covalently conjugated to CDs through the EDC/NHS coupling reaction to obtain the final NLS-CDs. After entering the cells, NLS-CDs combined with importin and formed an NLS-CDs-importin complex, and this complex passed through the nuclear pore to localize in the cell nucleus. Based on this study, they modified NLS-CDs with 4-hydrazinobenzoic acid (HBA) and conjugated DOX with the CDs through a hydrazone bond. The obtained conjugates delivered the anti-cancer drug DOX to the nucleus and killed cancer cells, which show potential as a promising nano-drug with enhanced therapeutic efficiency.107

Tan et al. reported another example in which CDs were functionalized with a peptide to achieve cell nucleus-targeted imaging.20 Initially, they synthesized CDs by heating a mixture of bovine serum albumin and formic acid, and then functionalized the CDs with the transactivator of transcription (TAT) peptide (GRKKRRQRRRPQ) to obtain TAT-CDs. The modification with the TAT peptide could overcome the lipophilic barrier of the cellular membrane and deliver the CDs into the cellular nucleus.

Small organic molecules can also be used to modify CDs and endow them with nucleus-targeting features. Barbosa et al. modified carboxylated CDs with ethylenediamine using thionyl chloride.17 The modified CDs are likely to have an affinity with ribosomal components, enabling the CDs to target the nucleus in the MCF-7 (breast cancer cells), MDA-MB-231 (breast cancer cells), Caco-2 (colorectal cancer cells) and DU145 (prostate cancer cells) cell lines.

Han et al. reported the synthesis of cationic carbon quantum dots that can distinguish nucleic acid structures and image the nucleus specifically.21 The carbon quantum dots were prepared via the oxidization of conductive carbon nanoparticles in refluxing HNO3, acylation with p-phenylenediamine (pda), and chemical linkage with 4-carboxybutyl triphenylphosphonium (PPh3+) bromide. The carbon quantum dots could be inserted into the grooves of dsDNA and the fluorescence was enhanced. In contrast, the fluorescence emission was bathochromically shifted and a new red fluorescence peak centered at around 620 nm appeared when the carbon quantum dots were mixed with ssRNA. This different interaction endowed the carbon quantum dots capability to discriminate DNA and RNA in nuclei and nucleoli by green and red fluorescence easily, respectively. Moreover, long-term imaging of chromatin and nucleoli during cell division and the growth of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) was also achieved.

Wu et al. reported the modification of carbon nanodots with catechol–borane moieties for the nucleus-targeted delivery of doxorubicin.108 The carbon nanodots were prepared by linking dopamine and 3-aminophenyl boronic acid with carboxylic CDs, which were denoted as p(CAT2-CD-BA1). The boronic acid on the outer shell of p(CAT2-CD-BA1) can bind to the glucosamine present in nucleoporin 62 (NUP62), which is the only glycoprotein existing in the inner ring of the NPC, endowing the CDs with nucleus-targeting ability. The authors also demonstrated that too much boronic acid modified on CDs over-interacted with the NUP62 gate and blocked the NPC channel.

2.2.3 Mitochondria-targeting CDs. To obtain mitochondria-targeting CDs, mitochondrially localized peptides and lipophilic/positive groups such as triphenylphosphonium (TPP) are the most frequently used targeting species (Fig. 5D).65,109,110

Xu et al. conjugated a triphenylphosphonium (TPP) moiety and a photo-responsive NO donor on CDs to construct a mitochondria-targeted and NO-releasing nano-platform for cancer therapy.110 After cellular internalization, the nano-platform was distributed in the mitochondria and released NO, which caused high cytotoxicity towards cancer cells by specifically damaging their mitochondria. Wu et al. constructed a mitochondria-targeting nanoprobe by conjugating TPP on CDs obtained using o-phenylenediamine.29 This nanoprobe was sensitive to peroxynitrite and its fluorescence decayed via the photoinduced electron transfer (PET) mechanism with a limit of detection of 13.5 nM. Cellular experiments demonstrated that this nanoprobe provides a practical tool for imaging peroxynitrite in mitochondria. Zhang et al. prepared a nano micelle via the assembly of TPP-modified D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate (TPGS) and 1-hexadecylamine-capped CDs.34 The nano micelle delivered DOX to mitochondria, which overcame the multidrug resistance of cells and enhanced the treatment effect. Gong et al. developed a mitochondrial oxidative stress amplifier by modifying CDs supported by atomically dispersed gold with mitochondrion-targeting triphenylphosphine (TPP) and ROS-generating cinnamaldehyde (CA).111 Upon mitochondria localization guided by TPP, the dispersed gold depleted mitochondrial glutathione, and thus amplified the reactive oxygen species damage caused by CA.

Shen et al. developed mitochondria-targeting supra-CDs via the modification of mitochondria-targeting peptides on CDs prepared by heating citric acid and dicyandiamide.112 The mitochondria-targeting peptide (MLALLGWWWFFSRKKC) was conjugated with CDs covalently and endowed the CDs with mitochondria-targeting ability, which enhanced the photothermal therapy effect on cancer cells.

2.3 Uptake pathway of CDs

The endocytosis pathway of nanoparticles plays a significant role in their transport process and final subcellular locations. For example, the clathrin-mediated cellular uptake pathway usually delivers nanoparticles into the endosome, and then transports them to the lysosome, while the caveolae- or lipid-raft-mediated uptake pathway usually transports the nanoparticles to the endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi apparatus.113

Zhou et al. pioneered the investigation of the uptake pathway of carbon dots in neural cells (Fig. 6A).114 They demonstrated the involvement of passive diffusion, caveolae-mediated, and clathrin-mediated pathways, and revealed the distribution of CDs mainly within endo–lysosomal structures, Golgi apparatus, and nucleus, respectively. They also noticed that a small number of CDs was dispersed in the ER and mitochondria. They addressed the decisive role of the ultrasmall size (1–5 nm) and positive charge (ca. +2.3 mV) of CDs on their uptake pathway.


image file: d3qi02145a-f6.tif
Fig. 6 (A) Schematic illustration of the uptake, intracellular trafficking and exocytosis of CDs in PC12 and RSC96 cells, reprinted with permission from ref. 114, Copyright 2014, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Graphical description of the preparation, cellular endocytosis and localization in LoVo cells of CDs with different chemistry, reprinted with permission from ref. 47, Copyright 2021, the American Chemical Society. (C) Endocytosis pathway for CNPs in SH-SY5Y cells and a differentiated neuron, reprinted with permission from ref. 119, Copyright 2023, The Royal Society of Chemistry.

We discovered that the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity and surface chemistry of CDs have significant effects on their uptake pathway and the final subcellular distribution. Hydrophilic CDs with surface amino groups could be internalized by cells mainly via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and located within the lysosome, while hydrophobic CDs decorated with laurylamine or short alkyl groups were internalized via caveolae-mediated endocytosis and membrane-penetrating passive diffusion and distributed in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).11,39 In a subsequent study, we designed four types of CDs with different surface chemistry and hydrophobicity, investigated their uptake pathway, and demonstrated their respective organelle-targeting feature (Fig. 6B).47 In this study, lipophilic ECDs and NCDs decorated with CH3 and C–O–C groups entered cells via a passive manner and localized in the ER and nucleus, amphiphilic GCDs with CH3, C–O–C and NH2 groups targeted the Golgi apparatus via caveolin-mediated endocytosis, while hydrophilic LCDs with CH3, NH2, and COOH preferred clathrin-mediated endocytosis and were distributed in the lysosome. These investigations proved the feasibility of organelle targeting by the design of surface chemistry and utilization of uptake pathways.

However, it should be noted that the uptake pathway of CDs by cells does not uniquely correspond to their organelles. For example, a combination of macropinocytosis-, clathrin-, caveolae-, and/or lipid raft-mediated pathways was identified in the internalization process of hydrophilic CDs that target the nucleolus.23 Besides, the lipid raft- and clathrin-mediated endocytosis pathways not only delivered hydrophobic CDs to the ER and lysosomes, but also transported hydrophobic CDs to lipid droplets.56,60 Nevertheless, a universal principle on the surface chemistry and uptake pathway by cells can be safely concluded, i.e., hydrophilic CDs with –NH2, –OH, and –COOH groups are usually internalized via the clathrin-mediated pathway, hydrophobic CDs with alkyl/phenazine groups are usually uptake via the caveolae-, lipid raft-mediated pathway or direct passive diffusion, while amphiphilic CDs can be internalized via both the clathrin- and caveolae-mediated pathways.114–117 A summary of the surface chemistry, uptake pathways, and subcellular locations of several organelle-targeting CDs is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Summary of the surface groups, uptake pathway and subcellular location of several organelle-targeting CDs
Precursors Surface groups Uptake pathway Subcellular location Ref.
Citric acid and urea –NH2 (ACDs), laurylamine (LCDs) Clathrin-mediated (ACDs), clathrin- and lipid raft-mediated pathway (LCDs) Lysosome (ACDs), endoplasmic reticulum (LCDs) 11
m-Phenylenediamine and L-cysteine –OH, –NH2, –COOH, and C–S Macropinocytosis-, clathrin-, caveolae-, and/or lipid raft-mediated pathways Nucleolus 23
o-Phenylenediamine and lysine CH3 (ECDs), C–O–C(NCDs), CH3, C–O–C and NH2 (GCDs), CH3, NH2 and COOH (LCDs) Passive manner (ECDs, NCDs), caveolin-mediated pathway (GCDs), clathrin-mediated pathway (LCDs) Endoplasmic reticulum (ECDs), nucleus (NCDs), Golgi apparatus (GCDs), lysosome (LCDs) 47
o-Phenylenediamine and urine NH2, alkyl groups Lipid raft-mediated and caveolin-mediated pathway Endoplasmic reticulum (ECDs) 49
o-Phenylenediamine Primary amine groups, phenazine structure Lipid raft- and clathrin -mediated endocytosis Lipid droplets 56
3-Aminophenylboro-nic acid –OH, B-OH, NH2 Lipid raft-mediated endocytosis Lipid droplets 60
Citric acid and ethylenediamine –OH, NH2 Caveolae- and clathrin-mediated pathways, passive diffusion Nucleus, endo–lysosomal structures and Golgi apparatus 114
Grape seed extract –OH, –COOH Caveolae-and clathrin-mediated endocytosis Nucleus 115
o-Phenylenediamine and phenylalanine Benzene ring, nitrogen heterocyclic ring, amino and hydroxyl Passive diffusion Endoplasmic reticulum 116
Rose bengal and DL-cysteine N–H, S–H Clathrin- and lipid raft-mediated endocytosis Endoplasmic reticulum 117
Commercially acquired CDs 3-Ethoxypropylamine, oligomeric polyethylenimine Clathrin- and caveolae-mediated and pathways, macropinocytosis Lysosome 118
p-Phenylenediamine and diphenyl ether NH2 Clathrin-mediated Lysosome 119


Recently, in-depth research on the cellular pathway of CDs has emerged. Yan et al. investigated the effect of the surface functionalities of CDs on their endocytosis in different cell cycle phases.118 They used 3-ethoxypropylamine-functionalized CDs (EPA-CDots) and oligomeric polyethylenimine-functionalized (PEI-CDots) as models. The results showed that the HeLa cells internalized overall slightly more PEI-CDots. In the presence of serum, EPA-CDots were internalized mainly via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and caveolae-mediated endocytosis, which functioned only in the S phases. In the case of PEI-CDots, caveolae-mediated internalization and macropinocytosis were the major pathways. However, regardless of the endocytosis pathway, both CDs were localized in the lysosomes. Besides, Hivare et al. investigated the endocytic pathways of CDs in neuronal cells at different stages of differentiation (Fig. 6C).119 They employed red fluorescent CDs synthesized through the reflux reaction of p-phenylenediamine with diphenyl ether, which possessed an aromatic ring of carbon and C–NH2 groups. When incubated with SH-SY5Y-derived neuroblastoma neurons, the CDs were preferably taken up via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and targeted lysosomes in undifferentiated cells and differentiated cells at different stages. These investigations provide an in-depth understanding of the cellular uptake of CDs, but the targeting by the CDs was limited to lysosomes. Thus, the uptake of other organelle-targeting CDs by different cells or cells at different cell cycle phases needs more attention in the future.

3. Challenges and perspectives

3.1 Rational design and precise preparation of organelle-targeting CDs

3.1.1 Improving the reproducibility and specificity of organelle targeting. To date, there have been abundant investigations on the development of different types of organelle-targeting CDs and subcellular imaging of organelle components or physiological parameters such as pH value and polarity.11,36,46,71,100,109 However, the rational design and precise preparation of organelle-targeting CDs are still challenging.

In the case of intrinsic organelle-targeting CDs, the most significant issue is the reproducibility of their targeting feature. As elucidated above, there are examples on the synthesis of CDs using identical precursors under identical conditions, but CDs targeting different organelles were produced.11,26,95,102 In addition, many CDs are decorated with similar surface chemistry but target different organelles.13,69,72,96 Moreover, there are also investigations in which CDs prepared from different precursors and possessing different surface chemistry/charge, hydrophilicity, and size could target the same organelle.28,46,73,90,120 Thus, the organelle selectivity of intrinsic organelle-targeting CDs needs to be improved (Fig. 7A).71,121,122 These issues remind us that knowledge on CDs is far from sufficient to understand and explain these phenomena.


image file: d3qi02145a-f7.tif
Fig. 7 (A) Illustration of the synthesis of CDs that target mitochondria and lysosome simultaneously, reprinted with permission from ref. 71, Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd. (B) Schematic presentation of column separation of CDs, reprinted with permission from ref. 133, copyright 2019, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) Illustration of regulation of morphology of CDs and the improvement in their ER-targeting specificity, reprinted with permission from ref. 140, Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons.

CDs do not possess definite structures and exact molecular weights. However, it is clear that CDs are usually composed of carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen elements, and some are doped with nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur, or other elements.10,123 Another consensus is that most CDs present a core–shell-like structure, and the composition and structure of their carbon core and surface group shell can be regulated by changing the precursors and reaction conditions.124,125 For a long time, researchers have devoted their efforts to producing various organelle-targeting CDs by regulating the precursors, optimizing the reaction conditions, and modifying CDs with specific moieties. However, there are various types of reactions between the precursors and these complex reactions lead to the production of multiple mixtures including carbon dots, unknown fluorescent molecules, or their combination, as well as other impurities and by-products.126,127–130 Thus, this complex composition may be the origin of the poor reproducibility of CDs, which make the rational design and precise preparation of CDs a difficult task. Considering this, the intrinsic targeting ability of one-pot prepared CDs seems to be a trial-error strategy to a certain degree. Notably, retrosynthesis methods in which the precursors were designed and the reactions between them were controlled made the intrinsic targeting CDs more precise and reliable.37,38 However, the retrosynthesis method is limited to mitochondria and particular precursors and suitable synthesis methods have not been explored in the synthesis of CDs targeting other organelles.

Rigorous purification by a combination of filtration, centrifugation, and dialysis with chromatography or gel electrophoresis can remove the by-products and obtain purified carbon dots with more reliable results.120,131–137 A typical example is the achievement of four different CDs targeting the ER, nucleus, Golgi apparatus, and lysosome from the purification of CDs using silica column chromatography and Sephadex.47 Separation of the one-pot synthesized CDs also provided evidence for the structure analysis and surface-state-controlled luminescence mechanism (Fig. 7B).133,135 To date, rigorous purification has been ranked as the most effective protocol to ensure the reproducibility of organelle-targeting CDs, which deserves to be popularized in the future.

In addition, new artificial intelligence methods such as machine learning may provide effective tools for the rational design of organelle-targeting CDs given that they assisted in the synthesis of CDs with predictable emission color and wavelength.138,139

In comparison with the intrinsic organelle-targeting strategy, the post-modification strategy avoids controversy through the use of specific targeting moieties, which helps to avoid the “trial-error” trap. However, specific targeting ligands change target sometimes. For example, the mitochondria-targeting ligand TPP endows CDs with a highly positive surface and facilitates the nucleoli imaging.21 Thus, the question arises whether can we use TPP to prepare nucleoli-targeting CDs? Besides, the post-modification strategy suffers from a lack of specific targeting moieties.

In summary, the reproducibility and specificity of the organelle-targeting ability of CDs need to be improved. Recently, Dr. E et al. reported an anion-directed strategy to control the morphology of fluorescent carbon nanoparticles from spherical to rod-shaped (Fig. 7C).140 All four types of carbon nanoparticles targeted the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), but their ER-targeting specificity was enhanced as their shape changed from spherical to higher-AR rods, accompanied by an increase in the Pearson correlation coefficient from 0.71 to 0.90. This investigation not only presented a new strategy to regulate the morphology of carbon dots, but also demonstrated that the morphology of CDs may be another breakthrough point to enhance their organelle-targeting specificity.

3.1.2 Development of CDs targeting more subcellular structures. Subcellular imaging is a powerful tool to visualize the evolution of organelle structures, reveal the interactions between organelles, and analyse the variation in the content of biomolecules.141 Thus, to realize this goal, comprehensive observations about the intracellular structures are of great importance, which demands reliable imaging results from all subcellular structures. However, the reported CDs to date exhibit limited targeting of the organelles in the nucleus/nucleus, mitochondria, lysosome, Golgi apparatus, lipid droplets, and endoplasmic reticulum. There are rare reports about CDs targeting the cytoskeleton, centrosomes, vesicles, lipid membrane system, peroxisome, etc.63 In addition, there is also demand that CDs discriminate the evolution and differences of a particular organelle at different statuses, including CDs tracking the delivery and fusion of endosomes with lysosomes, discriminating the granular endoplasmic reticulum and smooth endoplasmic reticulum, and visualizing the interaction between different organelles. In summary, new methods or strategies need to be explored for the further investigation of the organelle/structures that have been imaged by CDs, and new CDs need to be developed for organelle/structures that have not been imaged by CDs. In this case, give that organic molecular probes have been proven to have potential in multiple organelle-targeting imaging, the design and synthesis of organic fluorescent probes may provide some inspirations.2,142

3.2 The organelle-targeting mechanism

3.2.1 Diverse explanations of the targeting mechanism need consistency. The theoretical investigation of the mechanism is vital for further design and preparation of organelle-targeting CDs. However, there are diverse explanations for the organelle-targeting mechanism of CDs, especially for the intrinsic organelle-targeting strategy.

Usually, the targeting ability of CDs is attributed to their surface chemistry. However, the explanations for the targeting mechanism of functional groups are hardly consistent.143 For example, the weak alkaline or acidotropic effect of amino groups on the CDs was the most noted mechanism for lysosome-targeting CDs.44,69,144,145 However, the targeting ability of amine groups for lysosomes is not specific and amino-group-decorated CDs not only target lysosome, but also target the nucleus/nucleus77,79,146 and mitochondria,32,33,36 or target both lysosomes and mitochondria simultaneously.71 When CDs were observed to be located in the nucleus or mitochondria, the targeting mechanism was usually attributed to their surface positive charge or the combination of positive charge with appropriate lipophilicity.36,71,77,79,147 Although these proposed mechanisms can explain the experimental observation, there are still queries. For example, both the weak alkaline/acidotropic effect and the positive surface charges originated from the amino groups on the surface of CDs, but how can the amino groups selectively display different properties and locate in different organelles? If we need a type of nuclear-targeting CDs, should we consider amino group-decorated CDs? Moreover, there are investigations proving that CDs with negative surface charges can also target the nucleolus85,86 and mitochondria,148,149 which is inconsistent with the commonly recognized charges “repel and attract” principle. In summary, the explanations for the mechanism of the organelle-targeting ability of CDs are contradictory. Thus, new explanations need to be proposed.

There are multiple factors affecting the subcellular distribution of CDs, and although some of these factors have been investigated, some have been rarely noticed. One of the investigated factors is the cellular uptake pathway of CDs. When this factor was considered, rational and satisfactory explanations were proposed to explain why different CDs shared similar surface groups or charges but targeted different organelles.11,56,116 Besides, the uptake pathway of CDs was found to be dependent on their physical/chemical properties, such as surface chemistry, hydrophilicity, size, and charges.11,47,118 A raw principle can be addressed on the relationship between the physical/chemical properties and uptake pathways. However, the uptake pathway strategy does not result in specific organelle targeting sometimes. This is may be due to the fact that one endocytosis pathway can transport probes to several different organelles and the CDs can be internalized via several pathways simultaneously.23,75,117,150,151

In summary, reasonable targeting mechanisms have been proposed, especially when the uptake pathway was considered. However, there is still a long way to go to achieve consistent explanations for the targeting ability of CDs. To illustrate the targeting mechanism more clearly, we summarise the typical CDs targeting different organelles based on their raw materials and the targeting mechanism in Table 2.

Table 2 Summary of the raw materials and the targeting mechanism of typical organelle-targeting CDs
Organelle CDs Raw materials Targeting mechanism Ref.
Lysosome ACDs Citric acid monohydrate and urea Clathrin-mediated endocytosis 11
CDs Citrate acid, ethylenediamine, and morpholine Weak alkaline or acidotropic effect of morpholine groups 41
CDs-PEI-ML CA, PEI, and morpholine 42
CDs Benzoquinone and ethylenediamine Alkaline –NH2 groups 44
CDs Dexamethasone and 1,2,4,5-tetraaminobenzene 46
P-R CDs Rose bengal and branched polyethyleneimine 70
 
Mitochondria CDs Mercaptosuccinic acid, ethylenediamine, and chitosan Lipophilicity and positive charges 32
s-GQDs Perylene tetracarboxylic anhydride and polyethylenimine 36
APTMS CDs Glycerol and silane 33
N,S-CNDs α-Lipoic acid, citric acid, and urea Electronic interaction 91
C-dots-TPP o-Phenylenediamine, TPP lipophilicity and positive charges of TPP 29
MitoCAT-g Citric acid, TPP 111
SCDs Citric acid and dicyandiamide mitochondria-targeting peptides 112
 
Nuclear/Nucleolus QCDs Tris and betaine Positive charge 16
N-CDots Dopamine 19
Ni-pPCDs p-Phenylenediamine/Ni2+ 27
TAT-CDs Bovine serum albumin and formic acid Specific affinity of peptides 20
NLS-CDs PEG-2000, CA, ethylenediamine, and NLS 24
CDs Ascorbic acid Non-covalent interaction 28
HBIE-CDs m-Phenylenediamine and folic acid Hydrogen bonding 86
FCDs Sodium hydroxide and polyethylene glycol Protonation of oxygen groups 87
C-CD/TiO2 Dopa-decyl Zwitterionic surface 88
 
Golgi apparatus LC-CQDs Citrate acid and L-cysteine Specific affinity of L-cysteine 51
D/L-Pen-CDs D/L-Penicillamine and citrate acid Specific affinity of sulfonamide 53
GTCDs p-Phenylenediamine and benzene sulfonamide 54
 
Endoplasm reticulum LCDs Laurylamine, EDC·HCl and NHS Caveolae-mediated endocytosis 11
CD-MB 4-MPBA, 4-CPBA, and 4-MBA Positive charge, lipophilic surface, and boric acid groups 50
 
Lipid droplets CDs 3-Dimethylaminophenol Lipophilicity, endocytosis pathway 59
PA CDs 4-Piperidinoaniline 61
CDs 2,6-Dibromo naphthalene dianhydride 98


3.2.2 The intracellular transport process. When CDs are incubated with cells, the CDs first interact with the molecules on the cell membrane, and then internalized by the cells via different pathways, followed by intracellular transport, and finally localized in the subcellular organelles. Therefore, comprehensive investigations on the uptake pathway, intracellular transport process, and interaction of CDs with intracellular molecules will provide more evidences to determine the real organelle-targeting mechanism. The uptake pathways of CDs have been studied preliminary, but the influence of the intracellular transport on the organelle distribution of CDs has been seldom noticed.

As demonstrated by previous investigations, most nanoparticles are dominantly internalized via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and are trafficked to lysosomes.113 Thus, lysosome escape of nanoparticles is vital to determine their intracellular trafficking and final subcellular locations. It can be speculated that some CDs target lysosomes due to their failed lysosome escape rather than their real lysosome targeting ability. This can also help to explain why some amino-group-surfaced CDs are located in lysosomes but CDs possessing similar surface groups enter the nucleus or are attached to mitochondria.

In this case, the appropriate design of the surface chemistry of nanoprobes can enable endosome/lysosome escape.152 Post modification with the NLS peptide is an efficient way to help CDs escape from lysosomes and target the nucleus, as illustrated in section 2.2.2.24 Besides, surface groups that are readily protonated in the lysosome can induce the entry of excess water and splitting of the lysosome, and subsequently the CDs can escape from the lysosome.153 Besides, the lysosome escape of CDs is cell-line dependent. The design of the surface chemistry can also avoid non-clathrin-mediated endocytosis, bypass endosomal trafficking, and target different subcellular organelles.152 The preparation of CDs with amphiphilicity, lipophilicity, or hydrophobicity enables their caveolae/lipid raft-mediated endocytosis and passive diffusion, which makes CDs target mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, and lipid drops.11,47,49,56,60,114–119

The molecules on the cell membrane can be used to construct the surface chemistry of CDs. Nasrin reported the synthesis of folic acid fragment-decorated CDs, which were combined with a folate receptor and glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol (GPI) anchor to form a hybrid. After entering the cells, the hybrid was involved in endosomal transport and cleaved by lysosomal action by GPI. Subsequently, the CDs were released around the nucleus, where they penetrated the nucleus through nuclear pore complexes.151

Recently, the migration of CDs between organelles has been investigated. Guo et al. observed the migration of CDs between mitochondria and nucleolus when the mitochondria membrane potential (MMP) changed. The CDs migrated from the mitochondria to nucleolus when the MMP increased, and returned to the mitochondria when the MMP recovered.95 Gao et al. tracked lipid droplet dynamics by using amphiphilic carbon dots and found that LDs with green fluorescence (emitted by CDs) gradually accumulated on the mitochondria during starvation.58 Considering that organelle-organelle interactions are essential for maintaining intracellular homeostasis,154 these special discoveries may initiate new insight into understanding the transport of matter between organelles.

It can be seen that intracellular transport investigations produced more results on how to enhance the lysosomal escape or avoid the clathrin-mediated pathway. However, the transport process after internalization via non-clathrin pathways needs further investigations to determine the real intracellular fate of CDs.

3.2.3 Interaction with intracellular molecules. Nanoparticles begin to interact with molecules on the outer surface of cell membrane and in the cytoplasm once they contact cells.150 Thus, the interaction between CDs and specific intracellular molecules is the basic principle for understanding the targeting mechanism. If the active molecules playing vital roles during the internalization and transport process can be identified and the interaction between the CDs and the active molecules can be revealed, we can propose the organelle-targeting mechanism of CDs from a molecular perspective, which probably produces a targeting mechanism without contradictions.

The necessity to study the interactions between CDs and intracellular molecules has been demonstrated by several previous reports.

As is known, triphenylphosphonium (TPP) is a widely used reagent to endow nanoparticles with mitochondria-targeting feature and mitochondria-targeting CDs can be feasibly prepared by modification with TPP.23,34,110,111 The targeting ability is usually attributed to the electrostatic interaction between the highly positive surface of CDs induced by TPP and the highly negative surface of the membrane of mitochondria. However, the electrostatic interaction is not specific and the highly positive surface theoretically endows CDs interaction with the negative membranes of other organelles. Nevertheless, there are rare reports in which TPP-modified CDs targeted the endoplasmic reticulum, lysosome, Golgi apparatus, or lipid droplets. Therefore, we think it is better to reconsider the targeting mechanism of TPP-modified CDs by identifying the specific molecules functioning in the mitochondria-targeting process. Recently, an innovative study demonstrated the targeting imaging of nucleic acid structures rather than mitochondria by using TPP-modified CDs,21 in which the specific affinity of TPP towards DNA and RNA was evidenced solidly by experimental results. This study demonstrated that the interaction between CDs and DNA/RNA endowed TPP-CDs nucleus-targeting ability, which elucidated the targeting mechanism without any doubts. This example proved the significance of investigating the interactions between CDs and intracellular molecules.

Both DNA and RNA are polyanions and exhibit negative features in normal intracellular physiological circumstances. Theoretically, CDs with positive surfaces rather than negative surfaces target the nucleus easily due to their interaction with DNA or RNA.16,19,27,77–84 However, several investigations demonstrated that negatively charged CDs can also target the nucleus/nucleolus.22,23,28,85–87 Non-covalent interactions28 and hydrogen bonding87 with DNA/RNA were proposed to explain the targeting mechanism of CDs. Besides, the interaction between oxygen group-modified CDs and alkaline chromatin was also attributed to the reason for their nucleus-targeting ability.88 Although CDs mostly exhibit unspecific interactions with intracellular molecules, which result in artifacts, the study on these interactions is beneficial for the elucidation of their targeting mechanism.

Nevertheless, the active molecules in the endoplasmic reticulum, lysosome, Golgi apparatus, lipid droplets, and other subcellular structures have not been revealed, which need more attention and may become a potential field of study. Besides, active biomolecules functioning in the endocytosis process and the intracellular transport can also provide evidence for the subcellular targeting of CDs. To carry out related investigations, knowledge of molecular biology and cell biology should be emphasized and related investigation methods should be introduced.

3.2.4 Super-resolution imaging techniques. Seeing is believing, and thus clear and bright cellular imaging results with high spatial resolution make it easy to explain the experimental results. Super-resolution imaging techniques have broken the diffraction resolution limit (200 nm) and imaged specific proteins in the lysosome and mitochondria, organelle dynamics, and rapid subcellular processes.155–159 For example, Li et al. extended the resolution of structured illumination microscopy to 45–84 nanometres and imaged assemblies of clathrin and caveolin, as well as the dynamics of mitochondria, actin, and the Golgi apparatus.157 Qiao et al. developed rationalized deep learning for structured illumination microscopy and lattice light sheet microscopy and achieved imaging of the rapid kinetics of motile cilia and nucleolar protein condensation.159 Therefore, it is rational to speculate that super-resolution imaging techniques can help to reveal the uptake, intracellular transport, and final distribution of CDs more precisely.

Recently, super-resolution imaging of subcellular organelles using CDs as fluorescence probes produced interesting results. Hua et al. reported the super-resolution imaging of the nucleolus with a spatial resolution of 146–172 nm using red-emitting CDs, which presented a clearer nucleolus structure than conventional confocal imaging.27 In another report, He et al. designed CDs integrated with fluorescent blinking domains and RNA-binding motifs, which achieved super-resolution imaging of the nucleolar ultrastructure. The authors used the CD-depicted nucleolar ultrastructure as a hallmark to distinguish different cell types accurately and identify subtle responses to various stressors (Fig. 8A).134 In addition, by using stimulated emission depletion microscopy and endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-targeting CDs, Li observed the dynamic process of ER from loosely spaced tubes in a continuously dense network of tubules and sheets during cell division (Fig. 8B).116 They also found that the ER can contact with almost every other organelle.


image file: d3qi02145a-f8.tif
Fig. 8 (A) Illustration of the preparation of ER-targeting CDs and confocal and STED images of ER, reprinted with permission of ref. 116, Copyright 2022, The Royal Chemistry Society. (B) Schematic illustration of the structures of RBP- and N-CDs and STORM images of nucleolus structure of different cell lines, reprinted with permission of ref. 134, Copyright 2021, the American Chemical Society.

However, although some remarkable progress has been made in the application of CDs in super-resolution imaging, there are still great limitations, such as the aggregation and nonspecific binding of CDs, which may lead to artifacts.160 Besides, super-resolution imaging is expensive, which hinders its wide application. Therefore, designing the surface chemistry of CDs and developing new super-resolution imaging techniques to reduce the cost need more attentions. In summary, super-resolution microscopy can provide more details in organelle imaging with CDs as probes and help to understand the intracellular fate of CDs, but related investigations are still in their infancy.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we outlined the development of organelle-targeting investigations using CDs as probes by summarizing the organelle-targeting strategies, including the intrinsic targeting ability of one-pot CDs, post-modification with specific species, and uptake pathways of CDs. We also indicated the challenges in this field in which the reproducibility and specificity of organelle-targeting features and the targeting mechanism of CDs were emphasized. Potential solutions were proposed from the perspective of cells and organelles, in which the intracellular transport of CDs, their interaction with intracellular molecules, and super-resolution imaging techniques were highlighted. We believe that this review will provide useful insights to realize greater achievements in the field of organelle fluorescent imaging.

Author contributions

Quanxing Mao: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, writing – original draft, writing – review & editing. Yujie Meng: resources, writing – original draft. Yuhang Feng: resources, writing – original draft. Hui Li: funding acquisition, supervision, writing – review & editing. Tianyi Ma: funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, writing – review & editing.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21804062, 52071171, 52202248), Liaoning BaiQianWan Talents Program (LNBQW2018B0048), Shenyang Science and Technology Project (21-108-9-04), Key Research Project of Department of Education of Liaoning Province (LJKZZ20220015), Australian Research Council (ARC) through Future Fellowship (FT210100298, FT210100806), Discovery Project (DP220100603), Linkage Project (LP210100467, LP210200504, LP210200345, LP220100088), and Industrial Transformation Training Centre (IC180100005) schemes, and the Australian Government through the Cooperative Research Centres Projects (CRCPXIII000077).

References

  1. N. Donley and M. J. Thayer, DNA Replication Timing, Genome Stability and Cancer: Late and/or Delayed DNA Replication Timing Is Associated with Increased Genomic Instability, Semin. Cancer Biol., 2013, 23, 80–89 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  2. H. Zhu, J. Fan, J. Du and X. Peng, Fluorescent Probes for Sensing and Imaging Within Specific Cellular Organelles, Acc. Chem. Res., 2016, 49, 2115–2126 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  3. H. Wang, Z. He, Y. Yang, J. Zhang, W. Zhang, W. Zhang, P. Li and B. Tang, Ratiometric Fluorescence Imaging of Golgi H2O2 Reveals A Correlation Between Golgi Oxidative Stress and Hypertension, Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 10876–10880 RSC .
  4. P. Gao, W. Pan, N. Li and B. Tang, Fluorescent Probes for Organelle-Targeted Bioactive Species Imaging, Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 6035–6071 RSC .
  5. T.-W. Chen, T. J. Wardill, Y. Sun, S. R. Pulver, S. L. Renninger, A. Baohan, E. R. Schreiter, R. A. Kerr, M. B. Orger, V. Jayaraman, L. L. Looger, K. Svoboda and D. S. Kim, Ultrasensitive Fluorescent Proteins for Imaging Neuronal Activity, Nature, 2013, 499, 295–300 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  6. O. S. Wolfbeis, An Overview of Nanoparticles Commonly Used in Fluorescent Bioimaging, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 4743–4768 RSC .
  7. J. Qian and B. Z. Tang, AIE Luminogens for Bioimaging and Theranostics: From Organelles to Animals, Chem, 2017, 3, 56–91 CAS .
  8. Q.-Q. Shi, Y.-H. Li, Y. Xu, Y. Wang, X.-B. Yin, X.-W. He and Y.-K. Zhang, High-Yield and High-Solubility Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots: Formation, Fluorescence Mechanism and Imaging Application, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 1563–1566 RSC .
  9. Q.-X. Mao, L. Han, Y. Shu, X.-W. Chen and J.-H. Wang, Improving the Biocompatibility of Carbon Nanodots for Cell Imaging, Talanta, 2016, 161, 54–61 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  10. C. He, P. Xu, X. Zhang and W. Long, The Synthetic Strategies, Photoluminescence Mechanisms and Promising Applications of Carbon Dots: Current State and Future Perspective, Carbon, 2022, 186, 91–127 CrossRef CAS .
  11. S. E, Q.-X. Mao, X.-L. Yuan, X.-L. Kong, X.-W. Chen and J.-H. Wang, Targeted Imaging of the Lysosome and Endoplasmic Reticulum and Their pH Monitoring with Surface Regulated Carbon Dots, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 12788–12796 RSC .
  12. F. Wang, Z. Xie, H. Zhang, C.-y. Liu and Y.-g. Zhang, Highly Luminescent Organosilane-Functionalized Carbon Dots, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2011, 21, 1027–1031 CrossRef CAS .
  13. Y. Yang, J. Cui, M. Zheng, C. Hu, S. Tan, Y. Xiao, Q. Yang and Y. Liu, One-Step Synthesis of Amino-Functionalized Fluorescent Carbon Nanoparticles by Hydrothermal Carbonization of Chitosan, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 380–382 RSC .
  14. N. Li, X. Liang, L. Wang, Z. Li, P. Li, Y. Zhu and J. Song, Biodistribution Study of Carbogenic Dots in Cells and in Vivo for Optical Imaging, J. Nanopart. Res., 2012, 14, 1177 CrossRef .
  15. S. Karthik, B. Saha, S. K. Ghosh and N. D. Pradeep Singh, Photoresponsive Quinoline Tethered Fluorescent Carbon Dots for Regulated Anticancer Drug Delivery, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 10471–10473 RSC .
  16. K. K. Datta, O. Kozak, V. Ranc, M. Havrdova, A. B. Bourlinos, K. Safarova, K. Hola, K. Tomankova, G. Zoppellaro, M. Otyepka and R. Zboril, Quaternized Carbon Dot-Modified Graphene Oxide for Selective Cell Labelling-Controlled Nucleus and Cytoplasm Imaging, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 10782–10785 RSC .
  17. C. D’Angelis do E. S. Barbosa, J. R. Correa, G. A. Medeiros, G. Barreto, K. G. Magalhaes, A. L. de Oliveira, J. Spencer, M. O. Rodrigues and B. A. Neto, Carbon Dots (C-Dots) from Cow Manure with Impressive Subcellular Selectivity Tuned by Simple Chemical Modification, Chem. – Eur. J., 2015, 21, 5055–5060 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  18. Y. K. Jung, E. Shin and B. S. Kim, Cell Nucleus-Targeting Zwitterionic Carbon Dot, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5, 18807 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  19. Y. F. Kang, Y. W. Fang, Y. H. Li, W. Li and X. B. Yin, Nucleus-Staining with Biomolecule-Mimicking Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots Prepared by A Fast Neutralization Heat Strategy, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 16956–16959 RSC .
  20. M. Tan, X. Li, H. Wu, B. Wang and J. Wu, N-Doped Carbon Dots Derived from Bovine Serum Albumin and Formic Acid with One- and Two-Photon Fluorescence for Live Cell Nuclear Imaging, Colloids Surf., B, 2015, 136, 141–149 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  21. G. Han, J. Zhao, R. Zhang, X. Tian, Z. Liu, A. Wang, R. Liu, B. Liu, M. Y. Han, X. Gao and Z. Zhang, Membrane-Penetrating Carbon Quantum Dots for Imaging Nucleic Acid Structures in Live Organisms, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 7087–7091 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  22. Z. Zhu, Q. Li, P. Li, X. Xun, L. Zheng, D. Ning and M. Su, Surface Charge Controlled Nucleoli Selective Staining with Nanoscale Carbon Dots, PLoS One, 2019, 14, e0216230 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  23. X.-W. Hua, Y.-W. Bao and F.-G. Wu, Fluorescent Carbon Quantum Dots with Intrinsic Nucleolus-Targeting Capability for Nucleolus Imaging and Enhanced Cytosolic and Nuclear Drug Delivery, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 10664–10677 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  24. L. Yang, W. Jiang, L. Qiu, X. Jiang, D. Zuo, D. Wang and L. Yang, One Pot Synthesis of Highly Luminescent Polyethylene Glycol Anchored Carbon Dots Functionalized aith a Nuclear Localization Signal Peptide for Cell Nucleus Imaging, Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 6104–6113 RSC .
  25. J. Ci, Y. Tian, S. Kuga, Z. Niu, M. Wu and Y. Huang, One-Pot Green Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Quantum Dots for Cell Nucleus Labeling and Copper(II) Detection, Chem. – Asian J., 2017, 12, 2916–2921 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  26. S. Khan, N. C. Verma, C. Rao and C. K. Nandi, Carbon Dots for Single-Molecule Imaging of the Nucleolus, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2018, 1, 483–487 CrossRef CAS .
  27. X.-W. Hua, Y.-W. Bao, J. Zeng and F.-G. Wu, Nucleolus-Targeted Red Emissive Carbon Dots with Polarity-Sensitive and Excitation-Independent Fluorescence Emission: High-Resolution Cell Imaging and in Vivo Tracking, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11, 32647–32658 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  28. H. Li, M. Zhang, Y. Song, H. Wang, C. a. Liu, Y. Fu, H. Huang, Y. Liu and Z. Kang, Multifunctional Carbon Dot For Lifetime Thermal Sensing, Nucleolus Imaging and Antialgal Activity, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2018, 6, 5708–5717 RSC .
  29. X. Wu, S. Sun, Y. Wang, J. Zhu, K. Jiang, Y. Leng, Q. Shu and H. Lin, A Fluorescent Carbon-Dots-Based Mitochondria-Targetable Nanoprobe for Peroxynitrite Sensing in Living Cell, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2017, 90, 501–507 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  30. X. Wu, L. Ma, S. Sun, K. Jiang, L. Zhang, Y. Wang, H. Zeng and H. Lin, A Versatile Platform for the Highly Efficient Preparation of Graphene Quantum Dots: Photoluminescence Emission and Hydrophilicity-Hydrophobicity Regulation and Organelle Imaging, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 1532–1539 RSC .
  31. D. Zhou, H. Huang, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Hu and X. Li, A Yellow-Emissive Carbon Nanodot-Based Ratiometric Fluorescent Nanosensor for Visualization of Exogenous and Endogenous Hydroxyl Radicals in the Mitochondria of Live Cells, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2019, 7, 3737–3744 RSC .
  32. X. W. Hua, Y. W. Bao, Z. Chen and F. G. Wu, Carbon Quantum Dots with Intrinsic Mitochondrial Targeting Ability for Mitochondria-Based Theranostics, Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 10948–10960 RSC .
  33. G. Gao, Y.-W. Jiang, J. Yang and F.-G. Wu, Mitochondria-Targetable Carbon Quantum Dots for Differentiating Cancerous Cells from Normal Cells, Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 18368–18378 RSC .
  34. Y. Zhang, C. Zhang, J. Chen, L. Liu, M. Hu, J. Li and H. Bi, Trackable Mitochondria-Targeting Nanomicellar Loaded with Doxorubicin for Overcoming Drug Resistance, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 25152–25163 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  35. G. Qi, Y. Zhang, S. Xu, C. Li, D. Wang, H. Li and Y. Jin, Nucleus and Mitochondria Targeting Theranostic Plasmonic Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Nanoprobes as a Means for Revealing Molecular Stress Response Differences in Hyperthermia Cell Death between Cancerous and Normal Cells, Anal. Chem., 2018, 90, 13356–13364 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  36. J. H. Liu, R. S. Li, B. Yuan, J. Wang, Y. F. Li and C. Z. Huang, Mitochondria-Targeting Single-Layered Graphene Quantum Dots with Dual Recognition Sites for ATP Imaging in Living Cells, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 17402–17408 RSC .
  37. X. Geng, Y. Sun, Z. Li, R. Yang, Y. Zhao, Y. Guo, J. Xu, F. Li, Y. Wang, S. Lu and L. Qu, Retrosynthesis of Tunable Fluorescent Carbon Dots for Precise Long-Term Mitochondrial Tracking, Small, 2019, 15, e1901517 CrossRef PubMed .
  38. Z. Ye, L. Wei, X. Geng, X. Wang, Z. Li and L. Xiao, Mitochondrion-Specific Blinking Fluorescent Bioprobe for Nanoscopic Monitoring of Mitophagy, ACS Nano, 2019, 13, 11593–11602 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  39. Q. X. Mao, S. E, J. M. Xia, R. S. Song, Y. Shu, X. W. Chen and J. H. Wang, Hydrophobic Carbon Nanodots with Rapid Cell Penetrability and Tunable Photoluminescence Behavior for in Vitro and in Vivo Imaging, Langmuir, 2016, 32, 12221–12229 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  40. H.-J. Xiang, M. Guo, L. An, S.-P. Yang, Q.-L. Zhang and J.-G. Liu, A Multifunctional Nanoplatform for Lysosome Targeted Delivery of Nitric Oxide and Photothermal Therapy Under 808 nm Near-Infrared Light, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2016, 4, 4667–4674 RSC .
  41. Y. He, Z. Li, Q. Jia, B. Shi, H. Zhang, L. Wei and M. Yu, Ratiometric Fluorescent Detection ff Acidic pH in Lysosome with Carbon Nanodots, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2017, 28, 1969–1974 CrossRef CAS .
  42. L. Wu, X. Li, Y. Ling, C. Huang and N. Jia, Morpholine Derivative-Functionalized Carbon Dots-Based Fluorescent Probe for Highly Selective Lysosomal Imaging in Living Cells, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 28222–28232 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  43. D.-Y. Zhang, Y. Zheng, H. Zhang, L. He, C.-P. Tan, J.-H. Sun, W. Zhang, X. Peng, Q. Zhan, L.-N. Ji and Z.-W. Mao, Ruthenium Complex-Modified Carbon Nanodots for Lysosome-Targeted One- and Two-Photon Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy, Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 18966–18976 RSC .
  44. Q. Q. Zhang, T. Yang, R. S. Li, H. Y. Zou, Y. F. Li, J. Guo, X. D. Liu and C. Z. Huang, A Functional Preservation Strategy for the Production of Highly Photoluminescent Emerald Carbon Dots for Lysosome Targeting and Lysosomal pH Imaging, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 14705–14711 RSC .
  45. S. Chen, Y. Jia, G.-Y. Zou, Y.-L. Yu and J.-H. Wang, A Ratiometric Fluorescent Nanoprobe Based on Naphthalimide Derivative-Functionalized Carbon Dots for Imaging Lysosomal Formaldehyde in Hela Cells, Nanoscale, 2019, 11, 6377–6383 RSC .
  46. H. Liu, Y. Sun, Z. Li, J. Yang, A. A. Aryee, L. Qu, D. Du and Y. Lin, Lysosome-Targeted Carbon Dots for Ratiometric Imaging of Formaldehyde in Living Cells, Nanoscale, 2019, 11, 8458–8463 RSC .
  47. S. E, C. He, J. H. Wang, Q. Mao and X. Chen, Tunable Organelle Imaging by Rational Design of Carbon Dots and Utilization of Uptake Pathways, ACS Nano, 2021, 15, 14465–14474 CrossRef PubMed .
  48. Y.-W. Bao, X.-W. Hua, Y.-H. Li, H.-R. Jia and F.-G. Wu, Endoplasmic Reticulum-Targeted Phototherapy Using One-Step Synthesized Trace Metal-Doped Carbon-Dominated Nanoparticles: Laser-Triggered Nucleolar Delivery and Increased Tumor Accumulation, Acta Biomater., 2019, 88, 462–476 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  49. Z. Zhu, C. Liu, X. M. Song, Q. Mao and T. Ma, Carbon Dots as an Indicator of Acid-Base Titration and a Fluorescent Probe for Endoplasm Reticulum Imaging, ACS Appl. Bio Mater., 2021, 4, 3623–3629 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  50. M. S. Wu, Z. R. Zhou, X. Y. Wang, B. B. Chen, M. E. Hafez, J. F. Shi, D. W. Li and R. C. Qian, Dynamic Visualization of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Living Cells via a Two-Stage Cascade Recognition Process, Anal. Chem., 2022, 94, 2882–2890 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  51. R. S. Li, P. F. Gao, H. Z. Zhang, L. L. Zheng, C. M. Li, J. Wang, Y. F. Li, F. Liu, N. Li and C. Z. Huang, Chiral Nanoprobes for Targeting and Long-Term Imaging of the Golgi Apparatus, Chem. Sci., 2017, 8, 6829–6835 RSC .
  52. L. Wang, B. Wu, W. Li, Z. Li, J. Zhan, B. Geng, S. Wang, D. Pan and M. Wu, Industrial Production of Ultra-Stable Sulfonated Graphene Quantum Dots for Golgi Apparatus Imaging, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2017, 5, 5355–5361 RSC .
  53. M. Yuan, Y. Guo, J. Wei, J. Li, T. Long and Z. Liu, Optically Active Blue-Emitting Carbon Dots to Specifically Target the Golgi Apparatus, RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 49931–49936 RSC .
  54. X. Zhang, L. Chen, Y.-Y. Wei, J.-L. Du, S.-P. Yu, X.-G. Liu, W. Liu, Y.-J. Liu, Y.-Z. Yang and Q. Li, Cyclooxygenase-2-Targeting Fluorescent Carbon Dots for the Selective Imaging of Golgi Apparatus, Dyes Pigm., 2022, 201, 110213 CrossRef CAS .
  55. C. H. Li, R. S. Li, C. M. Li, C. Z. Huang and S. J. Zhen, Precise Ricin A-Chain Delivery by Golgi-Targeting Carbon Dots, Chem. Commun., 2019, 55, 6437–6440 RSC .
  56. M. X. Liu, N. Ding, S. Chen, Y. L. Yu and J. H. Wang, One-Step Synthesis of Carbon Nanoparticles Capable of Long-Term Tracking Lipid Droplet for Real-Time Monitoring of Lipid Catabolism and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Lipid-Lowering Drugs, Anal. Chem., 2021, 93, 5284–5290 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  57. D. Gao, A. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhu, D. Wei, J. Sun, H. Luo and H. Fan, Temperature Triggered High-Performance Carbon Dots with Robust Solvatochromic Effect and Self-Quenching-Resistant Deep Red Solid State Fluorescence for Specific Lipid Droplet Imaging, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 415, 128984 CrossRef CAS .
  58. D. Gao, Y. Zhang, K. Wu, H. Min, D. Wei, J. Sun, H. Yang and H. Fan, One-Step Synthesis of Ultrabright Amphiphilic Carbon Dots for Rapid and Precise Tracking Lipid Droplets Dynamics in Biosystems, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2022, 200, 113928 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  59. Y. Jing, G. Liu, C. Zhang, B. Yu, J. Sun, D. Lin and J. Qu, Lipophilic Red-Emitting Carbon Dots for Detecting and Tracking Lipid Droplets in Live Cells, ACS Appl. Bio Mater., 2022, 5, 1187–1193 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  60. C. She, Z. Wang, J. Zeng and F.-G. Wu, Orange/Red Dual-Emissive Boron- and Nitrogen-Codoped Carbon Dots for Wash-Free and Selective Staining of Lipid Droplets in Live Cells, Carbon, 2022, 191, 636–645 CrossRef CAS .
  61. J. Wang, Y. Guo, X. Geng, J. Hu, M. Yan, Y. Sun, K. Zhang, L. Qu and Z. Li, Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Enables the Rational Design of Lipid Droplet-Targeting Carbon Dots for Visualizing Bisphenol A-Induced Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease-like Changes, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13, 44086–44095 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  62. B. Unnikrishnan, R. S. Wu, S. C. Wei, C. C. Huang and H. T. Chang, Fluorescent Carbon Dots for Selective Labeling of Subcellular Organelles, ACS Omega, 2020, 5, 11248–11261 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  63. H. Liu, J. Guo, A. A. Aryee, L. Hua, Y. Sun, Z. Li, J. Liu and W. Tang, Lighting up Individual Organelles With Fluorescent Carbon Dots, Front. Chem., 2021, 9, 784851 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  64. F. Lin, C. Jia and F.-G. Wu, Carbon Dots for Intracellular Sensing, Small Struct., 2022, 3, 2200033 CrossRef CAS .
  65. B. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Wu, X. Song, X. Guo, D. Zhang, X. Ma and M. Tan, A Mitochondria-Targeted Fluorescent Probe Based on TPP-Conjugated Carbon Dots for Both One- and Two-Photon Fluorescence Cell Imaging, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 49960–49963 RSC .
  66. D. Li, E. V. Ushakova, A. L. Rogach and S. Qu, Optical Properties of Carbon Dots in the Deep-Red to Near-Infrared Region Are Attractive for Biomedical Applications, Small, 2021, 17, e2102325 CrossRef PubMed .
  67. X. Geng, Y. Sun, Y. Guo, Y. Zhao, K. Zhang, L. Xiao, L. Qu and Z. Li, Fluorescent Carbon Dots for in Situ Monitoring of Lysosomal ATP Levels, Anal. Chem., 2020, 92, 7940–7946 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  68. G. Zou, S. Chen, N. Liu and Y. Yu, A Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe Based on Carbon Dots Assembly for Intracellular Lysosomal Polarity Imaging with Wide Range Response, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2022, 33, 778–782 CrossRef CAS .
  69. X. Chen, X. Zhang and F.-G. Wu, Ultrasmall Green-Emitting Carbon Nanodots with 80% Photoluminescence Quantum Yield for Lysosome Imaging, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2021, 32, 3048–3052 CrossRef CAS .
  70. L. Tong, X. Wang, Z. Chen, Y. Liang, Y. Yang, W. Gao, Z. Liu and B. Tang, One-Step Fabrication of Functional Carbon Dots with 90% Fluorescence Quantum Yield for Long-Term Lysosome Imaging, Anal. Chem., 2020, 92, 6430–6436 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  71. X. Shi, Y. Hu, H.-M. Meng, J. Yang, L. Qu, X.-B. Zhang and Z. Li, Red Emissive Carbon Dots with Dual Targetability for Imaging Polarity in Living Cells, Sens. Actuators, B, 2020, 306, 127582 CrossRef CAS .
  72. H. Qin, Y. Sun, X. Geng, K. Zhao, H. Meng, R. Yang, L. Qu and Z. Li, A Wash-Free Lysosome Targeting Carbon Dots for Ultrafast Imaging and Monitoring Cell Apoptosis Status, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2020, 1106, 207–215 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  73. H. Singh, S. Sreedharan, K. Tiwari, N. H. Green, C. Smythe, S. K. Pramanik, J. A. Thomas and A. Das, Two Photon Excitable Graphene Quantum Dots for Structured Illumination Microscopy and Imaging Applications: Lysosome Specificity and Tissue-Dependent Imaging, Chem. Commun., 2019, 55, 521–524 RSC .
  74. S. Chang, B. B. Chen, J. Lv, E. K. Fodjo, R. C. Qian and D. W. Li, Label-free Chlorine and Nitrogen-Doped Fluorescent Carbon Dots for Target Imaging of Lysosomes in Living Cells, Microchim. Acta, 2020, 187, 435 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  75. B. Zhi, X. Yao, M. Wu, A. Mensch, Y. Cui, J. Deng, J. J. Duchimaza-Heredia, K. J. Trerayapiwat, T. Niehaus, Y. Nishimoto, B. P. Frank, Y. Zhang, R. E. Lewis, E. A. Kappel, R. J. Hamers, H. D. Fairbrother, G. Orr, C. J. Murphy, Q. Cui and C. L. Haynes, Multicolor Polymeric Carbon Dots: Synthesis, Separation and Polyamide-Supported Molecular Fluorescence, Chem. Sci., 2021, 12, 2441–2455 RSC .
  76. L. Wang, B. Wu, W. Li, S. Wang, Z. Li, M. Li, D. Pan and M. Wu, Amphiphilic Graphene Quantum Dots as Self-Targeted Fluorescence Probes for Cell Nucleus Imaging, Adv. Biosyst., 2018, 2, 1700191 CrossRef .
  77. P. Wang, H. Ji, S. Guo, Y. Zhang, Y. Yan, K. Wang, J. Xing and Y. Dong, One-Pot Synthesis of Nuclear Targeting Carbon Dots with High Photoluminescence, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2021, 32, 3911–3915 CrossRef CAS .
  78. L. Zhang, Z. Wang, H. Wang, W. Dong, Y. Liu, Q. Hu, S. Shuang, C. Dong and X. Gong, Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots for Wash-Free Imaging of Nucleolus Orientation, Microchim. Acta, 2021, 188, 183 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  79. C. Huang, Y. Sun, Y. Zhao, J. Li, L. Qu, R. Yang and Z. Li, Visual Monitoring of Nucleic Acid Dynamic Structures during Cellular Ferroptosis Using Rationally Designed Carbon Dots with Robust Anti-Interference Ability to Reactive Oxygen Species, ACS Appl. Bio Mater., 2022, 5, 2703–2711 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  80. Y. Liu, P. Chen, K. Yu, Z. Wu, N. Wang and X. Yu, Nitrogen and Sulfur Co-Doped Carbon Dots: Facile Synthesis and Multifunctional Applications for pH Sensing, Temperature Sensing and RNA-Selective Imaging, Microchem. J., 2021, 168, 106248 CrossRef CAS .
  81. L. Jiang, H. Ding, M. Xu, X. Hu, S. Li, M. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Q. Wang, S. Lu, Y. Tian and H. Bi, UV-Vis-NIR Full-Range Responsive Carbon Dots with Large Multiphoton Absorption Cross Sections and Deep-Red Fluorescence at Nucleoli and In Vivo, Small, 2020, 16, e2000680 CrossRef PubMed .
  82. Q. Wang, L. Shi, J. Zhao and S. Shuang, Fluorescent Carbon Dots with Real-Time Nucleolus-Monitoring Capability for Gene Delivery and Biosensing Of NO2 and pH, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2022, 599, 153902 CrossRef CAS .
  83. S. Sun, L. Zhang, K. Jiang, A. Wu and H. Lin, Toward High-Efficient Red Emissive Carbon Dots: Facile Preparation, Unique Properties, and Applications as Multifunctional Theranostic Agents, Chem. Mater., 2016, 28, 8659–8668 CrossRef CAS .
  84. H. Wu, L.-F. Pang, N. Wei, X.-F. Guo and H. Wang, Nucleus-Targeted N-Doped Carbon Dots via DNA-Binding for Imaging of Hypochlorous in Cells and Zebrafish, Sens. Actuators, B, 2021, 333, 129626 CrossRef CAS .
  85. P. Jiang, W. Pang, S. Ding, D. Wang, X. Wei and B. Gu, Rapid ex vivo Assessment of Cancer Prognosis by Fluorescence Imaging of Nucleolus Using Nitrogen Doped Carbon Dots, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2021, 1154, 338309 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  86. H. Liu, J. Yang, Z. Li, L. Xiao, A. A. Aryee, Y. Sun, R. Yang, H. Meng, L. Qu, Y. Lin and X. Zhang, Hydrogen-Bond-Induced Emission of Carbon Dots for Wash-Free Nucleus Imaging, Anal. Chem., 2019, 91, 9259–9265 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  87. W. Kong, R. Liu, H. Li, J. Liu, H. Huang, Y. Liu and Z. Kang, High-Bright Fluorescent Carbon Dots and Their Application in Selective Nucleoli Staining, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, 2, 5077–5082 RSC .
  88. P. T. M. Phuong, H. J. Won, A. I. Robby, S. G. Kim, G. B. Im, S. H. Bhang, G. Lee and S. Y. Park, NIR-vis-Induced pH-Sensitive TiO2 Immobilized Carbon Dot for Controllable Membrane-Nuclei Targeting and Photothermal Therapy of Cancer Cells, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12, 37929–37942 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  89. C. A. Choi, Z. A. I. Mazrad, J. H. Ryu, I. In, K. D. Lee and S. Y. Park, Membrane and Nucleus Targeting for Highly Sensitive Cancer Cell Detection Using Pyrophosphate and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity-Mediated Fluorescence Switching of Functionalized Carbon Dots, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2018, 6, 5992–6001 RSC .
  90. J. Zhou, M. Ge, Y. Han, J. Ni, X. Huang, S. Han, Z. Peng, Y. Li and S. Li, Preparation of Biomass-Based Carbon Dots with Aggregation Luminescence Enhancement from Hydrogenated Rosin for Biological Imaging and Detection of Fe(3+), ACS Omega, 2020, 5, 11842–11848 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  91. Z. Ji, D. M. Arvapalli, W. Zhang, Z. Yin and J. Wei, Nitrogen and Sulfur Co-Doped Carbon Nanodots in Living EA.Hy926 and A549 Cells: Oxidative Stress Effect and Mitochondria Targeting, J. Mater. Sci., 2020, 55, 6093–6104 CrossRef CAS .
  92. W. Liu, Y. Wang, N. Wu, W. Feng, Z. Li, L. Wei and M. Yu, A Mitochondrion-Targeting Fluorescent Probe for Hypochlorite Anion in Living Cells, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2020, 240, 118564 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  93. Y. Bai, Y. Wang, L. Cao, Y. Jiang, Y. Li, H. Zou, L. Zhan and C. Huang, Self-Targeting Carbon Quantum Dots for Peroxynitrite Detection and Imaging in Live Cells, Anal. Chem., 2021, 93, 16466–16473 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  94. H. Cai, A. Liu, M. Zhang, J. Song, P. Zeng, J. Qu, J. Guo and H. Li, Multifunctional Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots for HS Sensing and Mitochondrial-Targeted Imaging, Sens. Actuators, B, 2022, 367, 132048 CrossRef CAS .
  95. S. Guo, Y. Sun, J. Li, X. Geng, R. Yang, X. Zhang, L. Qu and Z. Li, Fluorescent Carbon Dots Shuttling between Mitochondria and the Nucleolus for in Situ Visualization of Cell Viability, ACS Appl. Bio Mater., 2021, 4, 928–934 CrossRef CAS .
  96. Z. Wu, Z. Liang, S. Guo, Y. Xiao, Y. Sun, L. Qu and Z. Li, Resolving Variable Cell Viability-Induced False Negative: Accurate and High-Contrast Fluorescence Diagnosis of Cancer Enabled by Dual Organelle Targeting and Multiple Microenvironmental Parameters Responsive Versatile Carbon Dots, Sens. Actuators, B, 2022, 359, 131577 CrossRef CAS .
  97. L. Jin, Y. Shao, X. Chen, X. Wang, Q. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhu, H. Yu, L. Han and F. Tian, Dual-Excitation Red-Emissive Carbon Dots Excited by Ultraviolet Light for the Mitochondria-Targetable Imaging and Monitoring of Biological Process in Living Cells, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2022, 425, 113702 CrossRef CAS .
  98. S. Paul, A. Bhattacharya, N. Hazra, K. Gayen, P. Sen and A. Banerjee, Yellow-Emitting Carbon Dots for Selective Fluorescence Imaging of Lipid Droplets in Living Cells, Langmuir, 2022, 38, 8829–8836 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  99. D. Gao, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhu, N. Xin, D. Wei, J. Sun and H. Fan, Facile Synthesis of Dual-Labeling Carbon Dots for Simultaneous Visualization of Lipid Droplets and Lysosomes, Carbon, 2023, 202, 265–275 CrossRef CAS .
  100. S. E, Q.-X. Mao, J.-H. Wang and X.-W. Chen, Carbon Dots with Tunable Dual Emissions: From the Mechanism to the Specific Imaging of Endoplasmic Reticulum Polarity, Nanoscale, 2020, 12, 6852–6860 RSC .
  101. R. S. Wu, Y. S. Lin, A. Nain, B. Unnikrishnan, Y. F. Lin, C. R. Yang, T. H. Chen, Y. F. Huang, C. C. Huang and H. T. Chang, Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Response in Living Cells Using Subcellular Organelle-Selective Amphipathic Carbon Dots, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2022, 211, 114362 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  102. S. Guo, Y. Sun, X. Geng, R. Yang, L. Xiao, L. Qu and Z. Li, Intrinsic Lysosomal Targeting Fluorescent Carbon Dots with Ultrastability for Long-Term Lysosome Imaging, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2020, 8, 736–742 RSC .
  103. C. Liu, H. Zhu, Y. Zhang, M. Su, M. Liu, X. Zhang, X. Wang, X. Rong, K. Wang, X. Li and B. Zhu, Recent Advances in Golgi-Targeted Small-Molecule Fluorescent Probes, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2022, 462, 214504 CrossRef CAS .
  104. W. Xu, Z. Zeng, J.-H. Jiang, Y.-T. Chang and L. Yuan, Discerning the Chemistry in Individual Organelles with Small-Molecule Fluorescent Probes, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 13658–13699 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  105. X. Yin, Y. Sun, R. Yang, L. Qu and Z. Li, RNA-Responsive Fluorescent Carbon Dots for Fast and Wash-Free Nucleolus Imaging, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 2020, 237, 118381 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  106. S. Rajendran, S. B. Zichri, V. U. Vipinachandran, R. Jelinek and S. K. Bhunia, Triphenylphosphonium–Derived Bright Green Fluorescent Carbon Dots for Mitochondrial Targeting and Rapid Selective Detection of Tetracycline, ChemNanoMat, 2021, 7, 545–552 CrossRef CAS .
  107. L. Yang, Z. Wang, J. Wang, W. Jiang, X. Jiang, Z. Bai, Y. He, J. Jiang, D. Wang and L. Yang, Doxorubicin Conjugated Functionalizable Carbon Dots for Nucleus Targeted Delivery and Enhanced Therapeutic Efficacy, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 6801–6809 RSC .
  108. R. Wu, J. Liu, D. Chen and J. Pan, Carbon Nanodots Modified with Catechol–Borane Moieties for pH-Stimulated Doxorubicin Delivery: Toward Nuclear Targeting, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2019, 2, 4333–4341 CrossRef CAS .
  109. F. Du, Y. Min, F. Zeng, C. Yu and S. Wu, A Targeted and FRET-Based Ratiometric Fluorescent Nanoprobe for Imaging Mitochondrial Hydrogen Peroxide in Living Cells, Small, 2014, 10, 964–972 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  110. J. Xu, F. Zeng, H. Wu, C. Hu, C. Yu and S. Wu, Preparation of a Mitochondria-Targeted and NOReleasing Nanoplatform and Its Enhanced Pro-Apoptotic Effect on Cancer Cells, Small, 2014, 10, 3750–3760 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  111. N. Gong, X. Ma, X. Ye, Q. Zhou, X. Chen, X. Tan, S. Yao, S. Huo, T. Zhang, S. Chen, X. Teng, X. Hu, J. Yu, Y. Gan, H. Jiang, J. Li and X.-J. Liang, Carbon-Dot-Supported Atomically Dispersed Gold as a Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress Amplifier for Cancer Treatment, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2019, 14, 379–387 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  112. Y. Shen, X. Zhang, L. Liang, J. Yue, D. Huang, W. Xu, W. Shi, C. Liang and S. Xu, Mitochondria-Targeting Supra-Carbon Dots: Enhanced Photothermal Therapy Selective to Cancer Cells and Their Hyperthermia Molecular Actions, Carbon, 2020, 156, 558–567 CrossRef CAS .
  113. A. Chakraborty and N. R. Jana, Clathrin to Lipid Raft-Endocytosis via Controlled Surface Chemistry and Efficient Perinuclear Targeting of Nanoparticle, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2015, 6, 3688–3697 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  114. N. Zhou, S. Zhu, S. Maharjan, Z. Hao, Y. Song, X. Zhao, Y. Jiang, B. Yang and L. Lu, Elucidating the Endocytosis, Intracellular Trafficking, and Exocytosis of Carbon Dots in Neural Cells, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 62086–62095 CAS .
  115. M. K. Kumawat, M. Thakur, R. B. Gurung and R. Srivastava, Graphene Quantum Dots for Cell Proliferation, Nucleus Imaging, and Photoluminescent Sensing Applications, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 15858 CrossRef PubMed .
  116. J. Li, L. Zhang, J. Chen, R. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. Zhao, B. Liu, M. Y. Han, G. Han and Z. Zhang, One-Step Synthesized Amphiphilic Carbon Dots for the Super-Resolution Imaging of Endoplasmic Reticulum in Live Cells, RSC Adv., 2022, 12, 19424–19430 RSC .
  117. Z. Wang, K.-F. Xu, G. Wang, S. Durrani, F. Lin and F.-G. Wu, “One Stone, Five Birds”: Ultrabright and Multifaceted Carbon Dots for Precise Cell Imaging and Glutathione Detection, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 457, 140997 CrossRef CAS .
  118. G. H. Yan, Z. M. Song, Y. Y. Liu, Q. Su, W. Liang, A. Cao, Y. P. Sun and H. Wang, Effects of Carbon Dots Surface Functionalities on Cellular Behaviors - Mechanistic Exploration for Opportunities in Manipulating Uptake and Translocation, Colloids Surf., B, 2019, 181, 48–57 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  119. P. Hivare, U. Singh, K. Mujmer, S. Gupta and D. Bhatia, Red Emitting Fluorescent Carbon Nanoparticles to Track Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Endocytic Pathways in Model Neuroblastoma Neurons, Nanoscale, 2023, 15, 1154–1171 RSC .
  120. B. Zhi, Y. Cui, S. Wang, B. P. Frank, D. N. Williams, R. P. Brown, E. S. Melby, R. J. Hamers, Z. Rosenzweig, D. H. Fairbrother, G. Orr and C. L. Haynes, Malic Acid Carbon Dots: From Super-resolution Live-Cell Imaging to Highly Efficient Separation, ACS Nano, 2018, 12, 5741–5752 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  121. S. Yi, S. Deng, X. Guo, C. Pang, J. Zeng, S. Ji, H. Liang, X.-C. Shen and B.-P. Jiang, Red Emissive Two-Photon Carbon Dots: Photodynamic Therapy in Combination with Real-Time Dynamic Monitoring for the Nucleolus, Carbon, 2021, 182, 155–166 CrossRef CAS .
  122. B. Zhang, Q. Duan, H. Zhao, Y. Zhang, X. Li, Y. Xi, Z. Wu, L. Guo, P. Li and S. Sang, Application of Carbon Dots in Nucleolus Imaging to Distinguish Cancerous Cells from Normal Cells, Sens. Actuators, B, 2021, 329, 129156 CrossRef CAS .
  123. B. Wang, H. Cai, G. I. N. Waterhouse, X. Qu, B. Yang and S. Lu, Carbon Dots in Bioimaging, Biosensing and Therapeutics: A Comprehensive Review, Small Sci., 2022, 2, 2200012 CrossRef CAS .
  124. C. Ding, S. Zhu and Y. Tian, Functional Surface Engineering of C-Dots for Fluorescent Biosensing and in Vivo Bioimaging, Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47, 20–30 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  125. S. Tao, S. Zhu, T. Feng, C. Zheng and B. Yang, Crosslink–Enhanced Emission Effect on Luminescence in Polymers: Advances and Perspectives, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 9826–9840 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  126. S. Lu, L. Sui, J. Liu, S. Zhu, A. Chen, M. Jin and B. Yang, Near-Infrared Photoluminescent Polymer–Carbon Nanodots with Two-Photon Fluorescence, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1603443 CrossRef PubMed .
  127. Y. Song, S. Zhu, S. Zhang, Y. Fu, L. Wang, X. Zhao and B. Yang, Investigation from Chemical Structure to Photoluminescent Mechanism: A Type of Carbon Dots from the Pyrolysis of Citric Acid and an Amine, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2015, 3, 5976–5984 RSC .
  128. J. Schneider, C. J. Reckmeier, Y. Xiong, M. von Seckendorff, A. S. Susha, P. Kasák and A. L. Rogach, Molecular Fluorescence in Citric Acid-Based Carbon Dots, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, 2014–2022 CrossRef CAS .
  129. J. B. Essner, J. A. Kist, L. Polo-Parada and G. A. Baker, Artifacts and Errors Associated with the Ubiquitous Presence of Fluorescent Impurities in Carbon Nanodots, Chem. Mater., 2018, 30, 1878–1887 CrossRef CAS .
  130. A. Koutsioukis, A. Akouros, R. Zboril and V. Georgakilas, Solid Phase Extraction for the Purification of Violet, Blue, Green and Yellow Emitting Carbon Dots, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 11293–11296 RSC .
  131. L. Liu, F. Feng, M. C. Paau, Q. Hu, Y. Liu, Z. Chen and M. M. F. Choi, Carbon Dots Isolated from Chromatographic Fractions for Sensing Applications, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 106838–106847 RSC .
  132. K. Hola, M. Sudolska, S. Kalytchuk, D. Nachtigallova, A. L. Rogach, M. Otyepka and R. Zboril, Graphitic Nitrogen Triggers Red Fluorescence in Carbon Dots, ACS Nano, 2017, 11, 12402–12410 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  133. V. Hinterberger, C. Damm, P. Haines, D. M. Guldi and W. Peukert, Purification and Structural Elucidation of Carbon Dots by Column Chromatography, Nanoscale, 2019, 11, 8464–8474 RSC .
  134. H. He, X. Chen, Z. Feng, L. Liu, Q. Wang and S. Bi, Nanoscopic Imaging of Nucleolar Stress Enabled by Protein-Mimicking Carbon Dots, Nano Lett., 2021, 21, 5689–5696 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  135. H. Ding, S.-B. Yu, J.-S. Wei and H.-M. Xiong, Full-Color Light-Emitting Carbon Dots with a Surface-State-Controlled Luminescence Mechanism, ACS Nano, 2016, 10, 484–491 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  136. F. Noun, J. Manioudakis and R. Naccache, Toward Uniform Optical Properties of Carbon Dots, Part. Part. Syst. Charact., 2020, 37, 2000119 CrossRef CAS .
  137. S. Chahal, J.-R. Macairan, N. Yousefi, N. Tufenkji and R. Naccache, Green Synthesis of Carbon Dots and Their Applications, RSC Adv., 2021, 11, 25354–25363 RSC .
  138. R. D. Senanayake, X. Yao, C. E. Froehlich, M. S. Cahill, T. R. Sheldon, M. McIntire, C. L. Haynes and R. Hernandez, Machine Learning-Assisted Carbon Dot Synthesis: Prediction of Emission Color and Wavelength, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2022, 62, 5918–5928 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  139. Q. Hong, X. Y. Wang, Y. T. Gao, J. Lv, B. B. Chen, D. W. Li and R. C. Qian, Customized Carbon Dots with Predictable Optical Properties Synthesized at Room Temperature Guided by Machine Learning, Chem. Mater., 2022, 34, 998–1009 CrossRef CAS .
  140. E. Shuang, Y. Z. Xing, S. Du, A. M. Liu, Z. Gao, Q. Zhou, Y. Xuan, Y. N. Zhao, X. W. Chen and S. B. Zhang, Shape Control of Carbon Nanoparticles via a Simple Anion-Directed Strategy for Precise Endoplasmic Reticulum-Targeted Imaging, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2023, e202311008 CAS .
  141. E. Meijering, A. E. Carpenter, H. Peng, F. A. Hamprecht and J.-C. Olivo-Marin, Imagining the Future of Bioimage Analysis, Nat. Biotechnol., 2016, 34, 1250–1255 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  142. X. Zhang, Q. Sun, Z. Huang, L. Huang and Y. Xiao, Immobilizable Fluorescent Probes for Monitoring the Mitochondria Microenvironment: A Next Step from the Classic, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2019, 7, 2749–2758 RSC .
  143. X. Zhang, L. Chen, Y. Y. Wei, Y. Z. Yang, X. G. Liu, J. L. Du, Q. Li and S. P. Yu, Advances in Organelle-Targeting Carbon Dots, Fullerenes, Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct., 2020, 29, 394–406 CrossRef .
  144. Y. Z. Xing, M. Yang and X. W. Chen, Fabrication of P and N Co-Doped Carbon Dots for Fe3+ Detection in Serum and Lysosomal Tracking in Living Cells, Biosensors, 2023, 13, 230 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  145. P. Gao, J. Wang, M. Zheng and Z. Xie, Lysosome Targeting Carbon Dots-Based Fluorescent Probe for Monitoring pH Changes in Vitro and in Vivo, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 381, 122665 CrossRef CAS .
  146. Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Shi, C. Sun, N. Zhou and H. Wen, The Synthesis and Functional Study of Multicolor Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots for Live Cell Nuclear Imaging, Molecules, 2020, 25, 306 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  147. H. Li, H. Wang, J. Guo, S. Ye, W. Shi, X. Peng, J. Song and J. Qu, Long-Wavelength Excitation of Carbon Dots as the Probe for Real-Time Imaging of the Living-Cell Cycle Process, Sens. Actuators, B, 2020, 311, 127891 CrossRef CAS .
  148. Q. Yang, S. Deng, L. Jin, Y. Jiang, C. Jin, B. Wang and J. Shen, A Novel Mitochondria-Targeted Fluorescent Probe Based on Carbon Dots for Cu2+ Imaging in Living Cells and Zebrafish, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 2021, 409, 113143 CrossRef CAS .
  149. Y. Hou, H. Liu, Z. Li, H. Zhang, L. Wei and M. Yu, One-Step Synthesis of Mitochondrion-Targeted Fluorescent Carbon Dots and Fluorescence Detection of Silver Ions, Anal. Methods, 2020, 12, 2835–2840 RSC .
  150. R. Augustine, A. Hasan, R. Primavera, R. J. Wilson, A. S. Thakor and B. D. Kevadiya, Cellular Uptake and Retention of Nanoparticles: Insights on Particle Properties and Interaction with Cellular Components, Mater. Today Commun., 2020, 25, 101692 CrossRef CAS .
  151. A. Nasrin, M. Hassan and V. G. Gomes, Two-photon Active Nucleus-Targeting Carbon Dots: Enhanced ROS Generation and Photodynamic Therapy for Oral Cancer, Nanoscale, 2020, 12, 20598–20603 RSC .
  152. N. R. Jana, Design and Development of Quantum Dots and Other Nanoparticles Based Cellular Imaging Probe, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 385–396 RSC .
  153. Q. Duan, M. Che, S. Hu, H. Zhao, Y. Li, X. Ma, W. Zhang, Y. Zhang and S. Sang, Rapid Cancer Diagnosis by Highly Fluorescent Carbon Nanodots-Based Imaging, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2019, 411, 967–972 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  154. Q. Chen, H. Fang, X. Shao, Z. Tian, S. Geng, Y. Zhang, H. Fan, P. Xiang, J. Zhang, X. Tian, K. Zhang, W. He, Z. Guo and J. Diao, A Dual-Labeling Probe to Track Functional Mitochondria-Lysosome Interactions in Live Cells, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 6290 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  155. S. W. H. a. J. Wichmann, Breaking the Diffraction Resolution Limit by Stimulated Emission: Stimulated-Emission-Depletion Fluorescence Microscopy, Opt. Lett., 1994, 19, 780–782 CrossRef PubMed .
  156. E. Betzig, G. H. Patterson, R. Sougrat, O. W. Lindwasser, S. Olenych, J. S. Bonifacino, M. W. Davidson, J. Lippincott-Schwartz and H. F. Hess, Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution, Science, 2006, 313, 1642–1645 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  157. D. Li, L. Shao, B.-C. Chen, X. Zhang, M. Zhang, B. Moses, D. E. Milkie, J. R. Beach, J. A. Hammer, M. Pasham, T. Kirchhausen, M. A. Baird, M. W. Davidson, P. Xu and E. Betzig, Extended-Resolution Structured Illumination Imaging of Endocytic and Cytoskeletal Dynamics, Science, 2015, 349, aab3500 CrossRef PubMed .
  158. G. Vicidomini, P. Bianchini and A. Diaspro, STED Super-Resolved Microscopy, Nat. Methods, 2018, 15, 173–182 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  159. C. Qiao, D. Li, Y. Liu, S. Zhang, K. Liu, C. Liu, Y. Guo, T. Jiang, C. Fang, N. Li, Y. Zeng, K. He, X. Zhu, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, Q. Dai and D. Li, Rationalized Deep Learning Super-Resolution Microscopy for Sustained Live Imaging of Rapid Subcellular Processes, Nat. Biotechnol., 2022, 41, 367–377 CrossRef PubMed .
  160. D. Jin, P. Xi, B. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Enderlein and A. M. van Oijen, Nanoparticles for Super-Resolution Microscopy and Single-Molecule Tracking, Nat. Methods, 2018, 15, 415–423 CrossRef CAS PubMed .

This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2024
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.