Jun Yuab,
Guisheng Wua,
Guanzhong Lu*ab,
Dongsen Maoa and
Yun Guob
aResearch Institute of Applied Catalysis, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, P. R. China. E-mail: gzhlu@ecust.edu.cn; Fax: +86-21-60879111
bKey Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Research Institute of Industrial Catalysis, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, P. R. China. Fax: +86-21-64253824
First published on 18th February 2014
The La or Ce-doped TiO2 prepared by a sol–gel method was used as the support, and supported gold catalysts for CO oxidation were prepared by the deposition–precipitation method. These Au catalysts were characterized by N2 adsorption–desorption, ICP, XRD, TEM, H2-TPR, and in situ FT-IR. It was found that doping Ce or La in the TiO2 support obviously improved the catalytic activity and stability of the Au catalysts for CO oxidation. The promoting effect of CeO2 on its catalytic activity is much larger than La2O3. The presence of Ce not only increases the surface area of TiO2 and restrains the growth of TiO2 crystallites, but it also enhances the microstrain of TiO2 and reinforces the interaction between TiO2 and Au. As a result of the redox efficiency of CeO2, the synergistic interaction between the Au particles and support, the activity of the active sites and the reactivity of the surface oxygen species, are remarkably improved. Moreover, the effortless decomposition of carbonates and the quick recovery of oxygen vacancies on the Au/Ce–TiO2 surface might be responsible for the high stability of the Au catalyst, compared with the Au/TiO2 catalyst.
The results of this research show that the catalytic activity of Au/TiO2 depends on the particle size of Au, the physicochemical properties of the support and the interaction between Au particles and the support. However the issue of the active sites remains a matter of debate: some authors suggest that metallic gold is more active,17–19 and others argue that oxidized gold is more active.20–22 Up to now, the deactivation of nano-Au catalysts is still a great and insurmountable obstacle for their commercial application. Some authors have attributed this to sintering of the gold particles, while other authors thought that the interaction between gold and TiO2 plays a vital role in maintaining the high activity of Au/TiO2.14,16,23
In order to further improve the catalytic activity, and especially the stability of Au/TiO2 catalysts, the surface modification of the TiO2 support was studied. Ma et al. studied the performance of Au/TiO2 doped with rare earth (RE) ions, and found that after the addition of RE ions an excellent activity was retained at ambient temperatures, and the dispersion of Au was enhanced.24 Due to the high oxygen storage capacity and redox of ceria, the presence of ceria in Au/CeO2/SiO2 can affect the state and structure of the support and the interaction between gold and the support.25 Idakiev et al. reported that ceria-modified TiO2 is of much interest as a potential support for the gold-based catalyst for the water-gas shift reaction.26 Recently, Li et al. reported that CeO2 dominated Au/CeO2–TiO2 nanorods are able to promote oxygen migration and gold dispersion, resulting in an evident increase in their catalytic activity for CO oxidation.27 However, the promoting effect of RE additives proposed by most of the researchers was attributed to their good thermal stability and high spontaneous dispersion.24–28 The role of the RE additives in the nature of the active sites is still unclear and needs to be investigated. Moreover, the comparison of the stability of the gold catalysts supported on TiO2 and RE-modified TiO2 is also barely reported.
Herein, composites of La2O3–TiO2 and CeO2–TiO2 were prepared and then Au species were highly dispersed and supported on the composites. A highly stable Au/TiO2 catalyst with a long lifetime for CO oxidation was developed by the introduction of RE ions. The role of the RE ions in the Au/La2O3–TiO2 and Au/CeO2–TiO2 catalysts was investigated, including the nature of the active sites and the synergism between the Au species and the RE-modified support.
A aqueous NaOH solution, 1.0 mol L−1, was slowly poured into a 0.025 mol L−1 HAuCl4 solution until the pH = 7.0. Then, TiO2 (or La2O3–TiO2, CeO2–TiO2) particles (>200 mesh) were added to the above-mentioned solution under stirring. This mixed solution was heated to 75 °C and aged for 2 h under continuous stirring, and its pH value was kept at 7.0 by adding NaOH aqueous solution. The solid sample obtained was washed with deionized water several times until the Cl− ions were not observed in the wash solution, and then it was dried at 80 °C and calcined at 300 °C for 2 h. The obtained catalysts are denoted as Au/TiO2, Au/La2O3–TiO2 and Au/CeO2–TiO2.
The H2-temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR) of the samples was carried out in a quartz microreactor. 0.2 g catalyst (60–80 mesh) was used and pretreated under N2 (40 ml min−1) at 500 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, the temperature was lowered to room temperature, and the sample was heated in a flowing 10% H2/N2 stream (40 ml min−1) up to 620 °C at 15 °C min−1. A quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS, OmniStar 200) was then used to monitor the desorbed gases.
The in situ FT-IR spectra of CO adsorbed on the catalyst were measured on a Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrometer equipped with a diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) cell with KBr windows. The sample in the cell was pretreated under N2 (30 ml min−1) at 300 °C for 2 h, and then the temperature was lowered to room temperature. After the cell was outgassed under vacuum to <10−3 Pa, the background was recorded. Followed by introducing CO into the IR cell (pCO = 8.0 × 103 Pa), the IR spectrum of CO adsorbed on the catalyst was recorded. The concentration of CO was higher than 99.97%, and it was pretreated by dehydration and deoxygenization before being used. The spectral resolution was 4 cm−1 and the number of scans was 32.
Fig. 2 illustrates the relationship between the catalytic activity and the reaction time of supported Au catalysts for CO oxidation. It can be seen that the catalytic activity of Au/TiO2 displays a dramatic decrease with reaction time at 60 °C, and decays by 48% after 8 h of reaction. It is interesting to note that the doping of rare earth additives can obviously improve the stability of Au/TiO2. The Au/CeO2–TiO2 catalyst shows the highest stability among the three catalysts, for instance, 100% CO conversion can be maintained after 13 h of reaction at 0 °C, and only decays by 9% after 40 h of reaction.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 CO conversion as a function of time on stream over Au/TiO2 at 60 °C, Au/La2O3–TiO2 at 20 °C and Au/CeO2–TiO2 at 0 °C. |
Catalyst | Au loading (wt%) | SBET (m2 g−1) | Crystal size (nm) | Microstrain (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Au/TiO2 | 0.28 | 34 | 33.3 | 0.25 |
Au/La2O3–TiO2 | 0.40 | 71 | 8.5 | 0.94 |
Au/CeO2–TiO2 | 0.42 | 65 | 8.9 | 0.93 |
The TEM images of the catalysts are shown in Fig. 4. It can be seen that the grain sizes of the Au/TiO2 catalyst are very big and mainly 30–40 nm. For the Au/La2O3–TiO2 and Au/CeO2–TiO2 catalysts, the doping of La2O3 or CeO2 restrains the growth of TiO2 crystallites, and their sizes are mainly 6–10 nm. This is in agreement with the result calculated by the Scherrer equation on the basis of the XRD patterns (Table 1). Meanwhile, the difference in grain size between different supports is also reflected by different specific surfaces areas (Table 1). Gold particles are homogeneously deposited on the supports. Compared with the Au/TiO2 catalyst, it is obvious that the gold species on the La- or Ce-modified TiO2 tend to eventually form more ultrafine gold nanoparticles on its surface. This is due to the higher surface area and stronger interactions between the adsorbed gold species and the support. In more detail, on smaller size particles of La2O3–TiO2 or CeO2–TiO2 (Fig. 4b and c), there are probably a large number of defects, such as oxygen vacancies, together with steps and adatoms on which gold immobilization could easily take place,29 which is also in line with the Au loading data (Table 1). Relating the activities of the catalysts with their physicochemical properties, it is suggested that the enhancement of the catalytic activity of Au/La2O3–TiO2 and Au/CeO2–TiO2 should be attributed to an increase in the microstrain and Au loading (Table 1), compared with the Au/TiO2 catalyst.
For the Au/La2O3–TiO2 and Au/CeO2–TiO2 catalysts, there is no obvious difference between their physicochemical properties, such as the crystal size, microstrain, Au loading and BET surface area. However, the catalytic activity of Au/CeO2–TiO2 is much higher than that of Au/La2O3–TiO2. This phenomenon shows that the differences in the catalyst structure alone are not enough to illustrate the differences in the catalytic activity for CO oxidation. To further investigate the interaction between the gold particles and the corresponding supports, the H2-TPR technique was employed, and the results are shown in Fig. 5. It can be seen that pure TiO2 is hardly reduced, and La2O3–TiO2 and CeO2–TiO2 have very weak reduction peaks at 275–420 °C and 170–320 °C, respectively.
After loading gold onto the surface of the supports, there are a series of strong peaks at 100–300 °C, which correspond to the four overlapping reduction peaks (α, β, γ and δ), and there is also a peak at 485 °C. Compared with the reduction peaks of Au supported on quartz, it is suggested that the peak at 485 °C is assigned to the reduction of Au oxide, and the peaks at 100–300 °C seem to be ascribed to the reduction of surface oxygen species of the supports promoted by Au species. Although the reduction peak of Au oxide species is similar for the four samples, the reduction peaks at 100–300 °C are quite different from each other. Only the γ and δ peaks appear in the Au/TiO2 spectrum, three peaks (β, γ and δ) appear in the Au/La2O3–TiO2 spectrum, and the Au/CeO2–TiO2 spectrum shows four peaks (α, β, γ and δ). According to the results reported by Shapovalov et al.,30 the bond energy of oxygen on the surface of oxides can be weakened by the presence of Au species, indicating that the reduction peaks at 100–300 °C might be attributed to the reduction of surface oxygen species activated by gold species.
Furthermore, the presence of RE oxides improve the properties of the oxygen species on the TiO2 surface, resulting in the variation of reducibility on the catalyst surface. As CeO2 possesses a high oxygen storage capacity (OSC) and facile redox cycle of Ce3+/Ce4+,25 the presence of CeO2 can obviously increase the reactivity of oxygen species on the surface of the catalyst and enhance the mobility of bulk oxygen in the catalyst. Thus, compared with Au/La2O3–TiO2, Au/CeO2–TiO2 may cause more active surface oxygen species by varying Ce3+/Ce4+. This results in the presence of the α peak in the TPR curve. The surface oxygen species on Au/CeO2–TiO2 occur at a much lower reduction temperature than Au/La2O3–TiO2.
To illustrate the redox properties of the catalysts, the repeated TPR for the catalysts is investigated, and the results are presented in Fig. 6. The results show that in the second TPR of all of the samples, no reduction peaks are observed. This is because the surface oxygen species have been exhausted during the first TPR. After the second TPR finished, the samples were cooled in N2 to room temperature and then exposed to oxygen flow at room temperature for 30 min. The results of the third TPR show that, the reduction peaks at 100–300 °C reappear, but the peak intensities are relatively weak and the reduction peak at 485 °C disappears. These results indicate that the surface oxygen species on the supports can react with hydrogen with help from Au, and the oxygen vacancies left can be restored in oxygen flow at room temperature. Compared with the third TPR curves of Au/TiO2 and Au/La2O3–TiO2, Au/CeO2–TiO2 still holds the strongest oxygen adsorption ability and possesses the most active oxygen species (represented by the α peak), although the α peak in the third TPR curve is smaller than in the first TPR curve.
![]() | ||
Fig. 7 In situ FT-IR absorption spectra of CO (80 mbar) adsorbed on (1) Au/TiO2, (2) Au/La2O3–TiO2, and (3) Au/CeO2–TiO2. |
For Au/La2O3–TiO2 and Au/CeO2–TiO2, there are a series of strong bands at 1670, 1586, 1425, 1246 cm−1. These are assigned to the bidentate and monodentate carbonate species adsorbed on the surface,41,42 and these absorption peaks are not observed in the Au/TiO2 spectrum.
In situ FT-IR absorption spectra of CO adsorption (Fig. 7) also reveal that the carboxylic stretching absorption peaks for Au/La2O3–TiO2 and Au/CeO2–TiO2 are blue shifted compared to that for Au/TiO2. The absorption bands of carbonyls on the (Aun)δ+ sites at 2160–2125 cm−1 appear for the Au/La2O3–TiO2 and Au/CeO2–TiO2 catalysts, which indicates that the more positively charged Au species exist on these catalysts due to the presence of CeO2 or La2O3. This is because doping with Ce or La is conducive to the formation of (Aun)δ+ sites with help from surface oxygen species.43 Among the rare earth oxides, CeO2 has a unique redox property and high oxygen storage capacity (OSC). It is also the best promoter of oxygen properties (such as mobility and reactivity) for transition metal oxide catalysts. Therefore, more (Aun)δ+ active sites are formed on the surface of Au/CeO2–TiO2 and play a very important role in improving the catalytic activity for low-temperature CO oxidation.
The first step is CO adsorption onto the gold particle, and then the surface carbonyl on the gold particle migrates to the Au–support boundary to transform into an active intermediate. The intermediate is continuously converted into carbonate-like surface species. Once this active intermediate decomposes to the CO2 product, the active site can be liberated and adsorption of gaseous oxygen can take place. This results in the restoration of the surface oxygen vacancies.
The carbonate species formed on the surface of the catalyst prevents the formation of the active intermediate (or complex). Therefore, it is generally illustrated as the deactivation of Au/TiO2.10,11 Based on the results of the H2-TPR and the in situ FT-IR, it is proposed that the Ce-modified Au/TiO2 possesses a very strong oxygen adsorption ability and active oxygen species at low temperatures. As a result, carbonates are easily decomposed to release CO2 on the Ce-doped surface and the oxygen vacancies are also readily formed or restored. The high stability of the Au/CeO2–TiO2 catalyst is attributed to the oxygen-enriched interface and strong Au–support synergy due to Ce doping. Therefore, the presence of Ce (La) improves the catalytic performance and stability of the Au/TiO2 catalyst.
Doping with ceria or lanthanum oxide improves the synergistic interactions between the support and Au particles, and enhances the reactivity of the surface oxygen species of the catalyst. Because of the redox properties of ceria and more surface oxygen species on CeO2–TiO2, more (Aun)δ+ active sites are formed, resulting in a higher catalytic activity over Au/CeO2–TiO2. Moreover, it is clearly revealed that the effortless decomposition of carbonates, and quick recovery of oxygen vacancies caused by the modification of Ce, might be responsible for the high stability of Au/CeO2–TiO2.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014 |