Wendel
Wohlleben
a,
Jérôme
Rose
b,
Mark
Wiesner
c and
Peter
Vikesland
d
aBASF SE, Dept. Analytical and Materials Science, Ludwigshafen 67056, Germany. E-mail: wendel.wohlleben@basf.com
bCEREGE (CNRS-Aix Marseille Universite - CdF - IRD - INRAE), Europole de l'Arbois, Aix en Provence, 13790 France. E-mail: rose@cerege.fr
cCivil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. E-mail: wiesner@duke.edu
dDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA. E-mail: vikesland@vt.edu
Not all societal needs can be fulfilled by materials that are inherently safe for humans and the environment. But pursuing such a goal from the outset of the innovation process offers significant advantages across various dimensions, such as reducing uncertainty regarding risks, enhancing value, increasing stakeholder confidence, and ensuring readiness for future regulatory requirements. Several large collaborative research projects, such as SERENADE, NANoREG2, SAbyNA, SUNSHINE, HARMLESS, focused on the safe and sustainable development of nanomaterials and advanced materials across various application domains. These projects employ a selection of interdisciplinary case studies representing different technology readiness levels (TRLs) and life-cycle stages. At the same time, innovation processes that integrate assessments of hazard, exposure, end-of-life, and performance in the intended use and overall sustainability have been described both from industry and from policy.9,10 However, methods that are fit-for-purpose, valid and applicable to advanced materials are only emerging, and more case studies of SSbD innovation are needed. Experience gained from case studies with nanomaterials has shown that, rather than a sequential SbD approach that focuses only on hazard and exposure issues for the nanomaterial component, a SSbD procedure is preferable that focuses on the final product as a whole and considers the field of application.8 Such approaches developed in the specific context of nanomaterials should be applicable to more complex advanced materials. It is essential to comprehend the intricate chemical, physical, and textural interplays among the diverse components within a complex product. To fully elucidate the complexity inherent in such systems such understanding must encompass both synergistic collaborations and antagonistic interactions.
The explicit consideration of the balance of the intended use and the different SSbD dimensions is a common feature of all contributions to the present themed collection. A tiered framework providing design principles and assessment recommendations during the earliest stages of the development of advanced materials is proposed by Wohlleben et al. (https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00831B). The themed collection comprises research into advanced materials that strive for enhanced sustainability, and which are created through deliberate design with precise manipulation of their multiple components, some with internal structure, some using advanced manufacturing techniques. Several sectors of application are covered:
• Sensors that are biobased (Hijazi et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00376K), partially biobased, partially biodegradable (Carboni et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00263B), or functional in their application due to multiple components (Babulal et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00808H, Priya et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00804E), or self-healing in biomedicine applications (Venkateswaran, et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EN00235K),
• Catalysts that are internally nanoporous (Asati et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00752A), deliberately designed (Jin et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00776F), functional in their application yet challenging in their lifecycle due to multiple components (Liu et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00820G; Di Battista et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00685A),
• Energy conversion & storage materials that explore the SSbD options (Shah and Gilbertson, https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00633F; Di Battista et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00338H).
• Biologically active materials including agricultural products interacting with plants or their pests (Pandey et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00939D, Singh et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EN00053F), and consumer products with antimicrobial and fungicidal functionality (Sipe et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00888F),
• Sorbents that are partially biobased (Rivadeneira-Mendoza et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00843F) deliberately designed (Fablet et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00962A), produced by advanced manufacturing techniques (Hwa et al., https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00780D), or more sustainable by substitution (Liu et al.https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EN00849E),
We hope that the present collection contributes to the wider adoption of principles of the safe and sustainable development of advanced materials, including those with nanostructures, and exemplifies pragmatic approaches for academia, industry, and regulators.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |