Weikun
Zhou
a,
Lizhikun
Gong
b,
Ren
Mitsuya
a,
Diwen
Chen
a,
Hiromichi
Ohta
c and
Tsukasa
Katayama
*cd
aGraduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, N14W9, Kita, Sapporo 060-0814, Japan
bKey Laboratory of Artificial Micro- and Nano-structures of Ministry of Education and School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
cResearch Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, N20W10, Kita, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan. E-mail: katayama@es.hokudai.ac.jp
dJST-PRESTO, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
First published on 19th December 2024
Ferroelectric perovskite oxide sheets with a high orientation and crystallinity are suitable for various applications. A promising method for their synthesis involves the combination of epitaxial growth with sacrificial layers that can be dissolved in solvents. However, the practical applications of these sacrificial layers are limited. They are typically grown on substrates such as SrTiO3 single crystals, which have not yet been scaled up for large-area applications. In addition, during the lift-off process, a high density of cracks are often formed in the ferroelectric sheets. To address these issues, we used a CaO sacrificial layer in this study. We deposited a ferroelectric BaTiO3 epitaxial layer on the CaO sacrificial layer, which was epitaxially grown on a [110]-oriented yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) substrate, together with a protective Al2O3 glass layer. After dissolving the CaO layer in pure water, we successfully obtained a crack-free freestanding BaTiO3 sheet with a lateral size of 5 mm × 2 mm. The resulting BaTiO3 sheet exhibited room-temperature ferroelectricity and piezoelectric properties with a large d33 value of 270 pm V−1 owing to the release of strain from the substrate. In addition, the YSZ substrate could be reused. Our study expands the range of water-soluble sacrificial layers and substrates for obtaining large ferroelectric and piezoelectric oxide epitaxial sheets.
Recently, the detachment of highly oriented and crystalline ferroelectric oxide films from their substrates and their subsequent transfer to Si-based electronic devices or flexible materials have garnered increasing interest, leading to an expansion of their applications.7–16 In the chemical lift-off and transfer processes of ferroelectric oxide thin films, the ferroelectric layer is epitaxially grown on a sacrificial layer deposited on a single-crystal substrate. When the as-prepared thin film is immersed in a solvent, the sacrificial layer dissolves, allowing the ferroelectric film to separate from the substrate.
One of the most commonly used sacrificial layers is Sr3Al2O6, which dissolves in water and causes minimal damage to the ferroelectric layer.7 In addition, the lattice constant of Sr3Al2O6 (cubic structure with a/4 = 0.3961 nm) is close to that of the ferroelectric layers with a perovskite structure, enabling the growth of highly crystalline ferroelectric layers. The lattice constant of Sr3Al2O6 can be tuned by doping with Ca or Ba.17,18 Other sacrificial layers have also been used to synthesize thin oxide sheets. Sacrificial layers with perovskite-type structures, such as La0.7Sr0.3MnO3, SrVO3, SrCoO2.5, YBa2Cu3O7, and SrRuO3, can be dissolved in acids.19–23 Moreover, sacrificial layers with NaCl-type structures, such as BaO and Sr1−xCaxO (0 ≤ x ≤1), can be dissolved in pure water.24,25 Highly oriented ferroelectric oxide sheets with perovskite structures, such as BiFeO3, BaTiO3, and lead zirconate titanate (PZT), have been successfully obtained via the lift-off method using these sacrificial layers.10,19,26
However, the practical applications of these sacrificial layers are limited. For example, these layers are typically grown on substrates such as SrTiO3 (STO) single crystals, which are not yet scalable to larger areas, rendering industrial use difficult. Furthermore, a high density of cracks is often formed during the lift-off process, thereby complicating the fabrication of large-area freestanding sheets. In this study, we demonstrate the use of an easily obtainable sacrificial layer, CaO, for fabricating a ferroelectric BaTiO3 (BTO) epitaxial film on a yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) substrate. Compared to STO, YSZ can form larger single crystals, and using YSZ as a substrate is also more cost-effective.27,28 After dissolving the CaO layer in pure water, a crack-free freestanding BTO sheet with a lateral size of 5 mm × 2 mm was successfully obtained. The resulting BTO sheet exhibited both ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties. In addition, the YSZ substrate could be reused after ultrasonic cleaning in pure water, thereby demonstrating the practical applicability of the CaO sacrificial layer.
The crystal structures of the as-grown film and sheet were evaluated using high-resolution X-ray diffraction (XRD; ATX-G, Rigaku Co., Japan) with a Cu Kα1 radiation source. The surface morphology was studied using atomic force microscopy (AFM; Nanocute, Hitachi High-Tech Science, Japan). The ferroelectric properties of the sheets were measured using a ferroelectric tester (Multiferroic II, Radiant Technologies, Inc., USA). The displacement was detected by a laser Doppler vibration system (VibroOne, Polytec GmbH, Germany), while the electric field was applied using the ferroelectric tester. For these measurements, freestanding BTO sheets attached to the PET substrate were used. The bottom electrode was the ITO layer, and Pt electrodes with diameters of 100 μm and 200 μm were used as the top electrodes for the ferroelectric and piezoelectric measurements.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 1 Schematic of the synthesis process of the freestanding BTO sheet using the CaO sacrificial layer. | ||
Fig. 2(a) shows the out-of-plane XRD pattern of the as-grown film. The 001 diffraction peak of CaO was clearly observed at qz/2π = 4.15 nm−1, together with the 001 and 002 diffraction peaks of BTO at 2.47 and 4.94 nm−1, respectively. The out-of-plane axis length of the CaO layer was 0.4820 nm, which is slightly shorter than the a-axis length of bulk CaO with a cubic structure (0.4881 nm).31Fig. 2(b) shows the reciprocal space mapping (RSM) image of the as-grown film around the 420 diffraction peak of YSZ. The 103 diffraction peak of BTO appeared at qx/2π = 2.49 and qz/2π = 7.41 nm−1. Based on these results, the lattice constants of the BTO layer were estimated as a = 0.401 and c = 0.4048 nm. The c/a −1 value was 0.9%, which is smaller than that of bulk BTO (1.2%).32 Furthermore, the 103 diffraction peak of BTO extended along the qx direction in the RSM [Fig. 2(b)]. These results may be attributed to the slight inclusion of a-axis-oriented domains within the predominant c-axis-oriented domains.
ϕ-Scan measurements were performed to evaluate the in-plane crystal orientation of the as-grown film. Fig. 2(c–e) shows the ϕ-scans of the BTO {103}, CaO {113}, and YSZ {420} diffraction peaks. The BTO and CaO layers exhibited four-fold in-plane symmetry, corresponding to their c-axis-oriented tetragonal and cubic structures, respectively. In contrast, the YSZ substrate exhibited a two-fold in-plane symmetry, reflecting the [110]-orientation of its cubic structure. The ϕ values of the {103} diffraction peaks of BTO were the same as those of the {113} and {224} diffraction peaks of CaO and YSZ. These results indicate that the [100] direction of the BTO layer ([100]BTO) is parallel to the [110] direction of the CaO layer ([110]CaO) and the [001] and [1–10] directions of the YSZ substrate ([001]YSZ and [1–10]YSZ). Furthermore, the [001]BTO direction was parallel to the [001]CaO and [110]YSZ directions.
Fig. 2(f–h) shows top-view images of the crystal structures of the BTO and CaO layers and the YSZ substrate in the as-grown film. First, we discuss the in-plane lattice matching between the BTO and CaO layers. In this regard, we focus on the Ba–Ba distance in the BTO layer (aBTO = 0.3992 nm) and the Ca–Ca distance along the [110]CaO direction (√2/2 aCaO = 0.3451 nm), where aBTO and aCaO represent the a-axis lengths of bulk BTO and CaO, respectively. The Ba–Ba distance in the BTO layer was approximately 16% longer than the Ca–Ca distance in the CaO layer. Because of this significant lattice mismatch between the CaO and BTO layers, the BTO layer is expected to grow in a relaxed manner on the CaO layer, resulting in a slight inclusion of a-axis-oriented domains within the predominant c-axis-oriented domains. However, two types of in-plane lattice matching are present between the CaO layer and YSZ substrate. The Zr–Zr distance in the YSZ substrate was 0.514 (=
aYSZ) and 0.727 nm (=√2 aYSZ) along the [001]YSZ and [1–10]YSZ directions, respectively. Compared to the corresponding Ca–Ca distance in the CaO layer (3√2/4 aCaO = 0.518 and √2 aCaO = 0.690 nm), the lattice mismatch values were 0.7 and −5%, respectively.
The as-grown film was placed in pure water and peeled off the substrate. Fig. 3(a–e) shows photographs of the as-grown film after immersing in pure water for different durations (0, 100, 200, 300, and 310 min). The thin film gradually separated from the substrate, starting at the edges, as the sacrificial CaO layer dissolved in the water. After 310 min, the CaO layer completely dissolved, allowing the freestanding BTO sheet to detach from the substrate. The sheet consists of an Al2O3 glass layer on the top and a BTO layer on the bottom. The bending occurs due to in-plane shrinkage of the BTO layer after the dissolution of the sacrificial layer. Bulk BTO transitions from cubic to tetragonal as it cools below the ferroelectric transition temperature (∼120 °C). The BTO film was deposited above this temperature, and upon cooling, a c-axis-oriented film was formed. Residual strain from the substrate limits full in-plane relaxation, but after the sacrificial layer dissolves, the in-plane lattice shrinks fully, causing the sheet to bend. Fig. S1 (ESI†) shows the AFM image of the BTO sheet, with an root mean square roughness of 4.4 nm. The dissolution rate of the 100-nm-thick CaO layer in pure water was approximately 0.24 mm h−1, which is ten times slower than that of the 50-nm-thick Sr3Al2O6 sacrificial layer (2.5 mm h−1).33,34 The freestanding BTO sheet with a lateral size of 5 mm × 2 mm did not show cracks [Fig. 3(f)] owing to the crack-resistance properties of the protective Al2O3 glass layer. We also tested various thicknesses of the CaO layers: 30 and 70 nm. The CaO layer did not dissolve even at a thickness of 30 nm at room temperature. At 70 nm, more than one day was required to fully dissolve the CaO layer. In order to scale up to inch-scale fabrication of BTO membranes, increasing the dissolution rate of the sacrificial layer through elevated temperatures or optimizing the sacrificial layer thickness is considered important. Fig. S2 (ESI†) shows photograph of the BTO/CaO as-grown film without the protective layer after immersion in water. Cracks and pinholes formed in the film, with pinholes spaced approximately 100 μm apart, showing the importance of the protective layer in maintaining the sheet's quality.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 3 Photographs of the as-grown film after being placed in pure water for (a) 0, (b) 100, (c) 200, (d) 300, and (e) 310 min. (f) Photograph of the freestanding BTO sheet. | ||
Fig. 4(a) shows the out-of-plane XRD pattern of the freestanding BTO sheet. Before immersing the sample in water, an adhesive-coated PET substrate was adhered to the surface of the film. The film was then separated from the substrate along with the PET, which served as a new support substrate and flattened the shape of the film. The XRD measurements were conducted on the freestanding BTO sheets attached to the PET substrate. Its XRD pattern showed that the 001 diffraction peak of CaO disappeared, whereas the 001 and 002 diffraction peaks of BTO remained unchanged. The c-axis length of the BTO layer was 0.404 nm, which was almost the same as that of the as-grown film. In addition, the 103 diffraction peak of BTO was observed in the RSM image [Fig. 4(b)]. These results confirmed that the crystal orientation of the BTO layer was maintained even after the film was separated from the substrate. Fig. S3 (ESI†) shows the rocking curve of the 002 diffraction peaks of BTO for the as-grown film and freestanding sheet; the full width at half maximum (FWHM) values were 0.92 and 1.20°, respectively.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 (a) Out-of-plane XRD pattern and (b) RSM of the BTO sheet transferred onto the PET substrate. | ||
Fig. 5(a) shows the plots of polarization and current versus the electric field (P–E and I–E) for the BTO sheet. The measurements were performed at 300 K and 10 kHz. A distinct ferroelectric hysteresis loop was observed in the P–E curve, accompanied by polarization reversal current peaks in the I–E curve, confirming the room-temperature ferroelectricity of the BTO sheet. The coercive field value of the BTO sheet is 0.5 MV cm−1. The remnant polarization value was 15 μC cm−2, which is smaller than that of the bulk single-crystal BTO (25 μC cm−2). This is probably due to the smaller c/a–1 value of the film (0.9%) than that of the bulk film (1.2%). Fig. 5(b) shows the plot of displacement versus E along the out-of-plane direction of the BTO sheet. A clear butterfly curve was observed, confirming the piezoelectricity of the BTO sheet. The d33 value was 270 pm V−1, which is higher than those obtained for epitaxial films grown on substrates, and approaches the piezoelectric coefficient of domain-engineered bulk BTO.35,36 In epitaxial films, the piezoelectric strain is suppressed owing to the substrate-clamping effect. However, after the film was separated from the substrate, its state approached that of single crystals, resulting in enhanced piezoelectric properties.36 The d33 value reported in this study was measured using a laser Doppler vibration system. However, it is important to note that this method may be influenced by artifacts, such as distortion of substrates. Accurate evaluation requires simultaneous measurements from both the front and back sides of the substrate to account for these artifacts. Since this study only performed top-side measurements, the reported d33 value may be overestimated. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 5 (a) Plots of polarization (P), current (I), and (b) displacement versus the electric field (E) for the BTO sheet at 10 kHz and 300 K. The thickness of the BTO layer was 300 nm. | ||
Further, we investigated the reusability of the YSZ substrate. After peeling the film from the YSZ substrate, ultrasonic cleaning was performed in pure water for 5 min to remove any residual material from the surface. The substrate was then reused to fabricate a new film [Fig. 6(a)]. Fig. 6(b) shows the surface morphology of the YSZ substrate after the ultrasonic cleaning. The root mean square of the roughness of the YSZ substrate was 0.16 nm, which is close to that of the new substrate (Fig. S4, ESI†). Fig. 6(c) shows out-of-plane XRD patterns of the as-grown films and sheets after the first and second cycles. In the XRD profiles of all the samples, the 002 diffraction peaks of BTO were clearly observed. The XRD results indicated no significant differences between the first and second cycles, demonstrating that the substrate could be effectively reused.
Footnote |
| † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Details of XRD and AFM results are provided. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4tc04585h |
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |