Volume 243, 2023

Mechanistic understanding of N2 activation: a comparison of unsupported and supported Ru catalysts

Abstract

N2 dissociative adsorption is commonly the rate-determining step in thermal ammonia synthesis. Herein, we performed density functional theory (DFT) calculations to understand the N2 dissociation mechanism on models of unsupported Ru(0001) terraces, Ru B5 sites, and polar MgO(111)-supported Ru8 cluster mimicking a B5 site geometry, denoted (Ru8(B5-like)/MgO(111)). The activation energy of N2 dissociative adsorption on the Ru8(B5-like)/MgO(111) model (Ea = 0.33 eV) is much lower than that on the unsupported Ru(0001) terrace (Ea = 1.74 eV) and Ru B5 (Ea = 0.62 eV) models. The lower N2 dissociation barrier on Ru B5 sites is facilitated by the enhanced σ donation and π* back-donation between N2(σ, π*) and Ru(d) orbitals resulting in the stronger activation of the molecular side-on N2* dissociation precursor. The Ru8(B5-like)/MgO(111) also exhibits enhanced σ donation because of the B5-like cluster geometry. Furthermore, the Ru cluster of the bare Ru8(B5-like)/MgO(111) model is positively charged. This induced an unusual π donation from N2(π) to Ru(d) orbitals as revealed by analyses of the density of states and partial charge densities. The combined σ and π donation resulted in an increased synergistic π* back-donation. The total interactions between N2(σ, π, π*) and Ru(d) resulted in an overall electron transfer to the adsorbed N2 from the Ru atoms in the B5-like site with no direct involvement of the MgO(111) substrate. Analyses of bond stretching vibrations and bond lengths show that the N2(σ, π, π*) and Ru(d) interactions lead to a weaker N–N bond and stronger Ru–N bonds. These correspond to a lower barrier of N2 dissociation on the Ru8(B5-like)/MgO(111) model, where the highest red-shift of N–N vibration and the longest N–N bond length were observed after side-on N2* adsorption. These results demonstrate that an electron-deficient Ru catalyst are not always inhibited from donating electrons to adsorbed N2. Rather, this study shows that the electron deficiency of Ru can promote π* back-donation and N2 activation. These new insights may therefore open new avenues to design supported Ru catalysts for nitrogen activation.

Graphical abstract: Mechanistic understanding of N2 activation: a comparison of unsupported and supported Ru catalysts

Associated articles

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
05 dic. 2022
Accepted
16 ene. 2023
First published
19 ene. 2023

Faraday Discuss., 2023,243, 148-163

Mechanistic understanding of N2 activation: a comparison of unsupported and supported Ru catalysts

Y. I. A. Reyes, K. Yang, H. V. Thang, C. Coluccini, S. Chen and H. T. Chen, Faraday Discuss., 2023, 243, 148 DOI: 10.1039/D2FD00172A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements