Xiyu Song*ab,
Chuang Daia,
Mingda Lia,
Min Lic,
Liu Hud,
Yu Wanga,
Aiqin Houb and
Hongfei Qiana
aKey Laboratory of Clean Dyeing and Finishing Technology of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, PR China. E-mail: xiyusong@usx.edu.cn
bCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, PR China
cCollege of Textile and Garment, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, PR China
dEngineering Research Center for Eco-Dyeing and Finishing of Textiles Ministry of Education, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, PR China
First published on 2nd January 2024
To obtain high-performance disperse dyes, a series of azo disperse dyes containing different kinds of ester groups based on benzisothiazole were synthesized by the coupling reaction of diazotization of 3-amino-5-nitro [2,1] benzisothiazole with N-substituted aniline compounds bearing different ester moieties. The structures of the synthesized dyes were evaluated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), nuclear magnetic resonance techniques (1H-NMR), and MS analysis. UV-Vis spectrophotometry methods were applied to study absorption maxima, molar extinction coefficients, and solvatochromic behaviors of the dyes, and time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) simulations were applied to reveal the nature of the absorption spectrum properties. Polyester fabrics were colored using a high-temperature dyeing method under pressure, and the dyed fabrics exhibited deep and bright intense blue hues. In addition, excellent fastness properties, including washing fastness, sublimation fastness, rubbing fastness, and light fastness, were achieved.
Fig. 1 The typical structures of the dyes mentioned from references: (a) from ref. 9, (b) from ref. 10, (c) from ref. 11, (d) from ref. 12, (e) from ref. 13, (f) from ref. 14, (g) from ref. 15, (h) from ref. 16, (i) from ref. 17, (j) from ref. 18, (k) from ref. 19, (l) for ref. 20. |
To correlate the dye structures with properties, benzisothiazole azo disperse dyes bearing different ester groups were synthesized, which exhibited excellent dyeing performance. In order to investigate the effect of different kinds of ester groups on the performance of the dyes, four disperse dyes were synthesized using N,N-di(β-methoxycarbonylethyl)aniline, N,N-diacetoxyethyl-aniline, N-acetoxyethyl-N-cyanoethyl-aniline, and N-benzoyloxyethyl-N-cyanoethyl-aniline as the coupling components, which could react with diazotized 3-amino-5-nitro [2,1] benzisothiazole to obtain the benzisothiazole dyes bearing ester groups. The spectral differences were rationalized in accordance with dye structures for comparative purposes based on the experimental results and simulated data. These dyes were applied to polyester fabrics using a high-temperature dyeing method. Colorimetric data and fastness properties of the dyed polyester fabrics were also evaluated. Quantum DFT simulation was applied to investigate the substituent effect on the dyeing performance of the designed dyes.
Fourier-transformed infrared (FTIR) spectra were measured using a Spectrum Two FT-IR spectrometer (PerkinElmer Inc., Llantrisant, UK) scanning between 4000 and 500 cm−1. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) was recorded on a Bruker AV 400 (Bruker Co., Faellanden, Switzerland), using dimethylsulphoxide-d6 (DMSO-d6) as solvents at 25 °C. Visible absorption spectra were measured using a UV-vis spectrometer (Hitachi Limited, Japan). Melting points were measured using the open capillary method with a Mel-Temp capillary melting point apparatus (Shanghai Precision and Scientific Instruments, China). MS analysis was performed on a Waters XEVO-TQD QCA1056 Series LCMS system.
D1: blue powder, 72.35% yield, mp 134–135 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, δH, ppm): 9.09 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H of nitrobenzisothiazole), 8.23 (dd, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H of nitrobenzisothiazole), 8.03 (dd, J = 9.6, 2.4 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.89 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H of nitrobenzisothiazole), 7.00 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 3.83 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H, –N–CH2–), 3.63 (s, 6H, –CH3), 2.71 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 4H, –CH2–). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ, ppm) yielded 180.2, 171.5 (×2), 161.9, 152.5, 144.1, 143.3, 126.8, 123.0, 122.9, 122.5, 121.8, 120.5, 119.1, 112.8, 51.5 (×2), 46.3 (×2) and 31.5 (×2). Main FT-IR absorption peaks (KBr pellet, v cm−1): 2952 (R-H), 1728 (CO), 1592, 1555, 1513&1341 (NO2), 1496, 1433, 1400, 1305, 1230, 1195, 1158, 1121, 1070, 1021. MS (ESI+) was m/z (%) = 472.28 (100) [M+].
D2: dark blue powder, 85.35% yield, mp 150–151 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, δH, ppm): 9.10 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H of nitrobenzothiazole cycle), 8.23 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 2H, 1H of nitrobenzothiazole cycle), 8.01 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.89 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H of nitrobenzisothiazole), 7.10 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 4.28 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 4H, –CH2–), 3.87 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 4H, –CH2–), 2.00 (s, 6H, –CH3). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ, ppm) yielded 180.7, 170.8 (×2), 162.4, 154.0, 144.6, 143.8, 127.4, 123.5, 123.4, 123.0, 122.3, 121.1, 119.7, 113.5, 61.5 (×2), 49.7 (×2) and 21.1 (×2). Main FT-IR absorption peaks (KBr pellet, v cm−1): 2969 (R-H), 1729 (CO), 1592, 1515&1324 (NO2), 1496, 1401, 1299, 1225, 1160, 1137, 1119, 1061. MS (ESI+) was m/z (%) = 472.28 (100) [M+].
D3: blue powder, 97.36% yield, mp 160–161 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, δH, ppm): 9.12 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H of nitrobenzothiazole cycle), 8.24 (dd, J = 9.7 Hz, 2.4 Hz, 1H of nitrobenzothiazole cycle), 8.03 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.91 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H of nitrobenzothiazole cycle), 7.14 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 4.28 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H, –CH2–), 3.92 (dd, J = 15.5, 8.7 Hz, 2H, –CH2–), 3.89 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H, –CH2–), 2.89 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, –CH2–), 2.00 (s, 3H, –CH3). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ, ppm) yielded 180.5, 170.8, 162.4, 153.3, 144.8, 144.1, 127.6, 123.6, 123.5, 123.0, 122.3, 121.1, 119.7, 113.6, 61.4, 49.2, 46.6, 21.1, 16.0. Main FT-IR absorption peaks (KBr pellet, v cm−1): 3094 (Ar-H), 2968 (R-H), 2246 (CN), 1729 (CO), 1592, 1557, 1515 & 1325 (NO2), 1495, 1400, 1369, 1348, 1298, 1225, 1160, 1119, 1061. MS (ESI+) was m/z (%) = 439.38 (100) [M+].
D4: blue powder, 96.4% yield, mp 183–184 °C, 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, δH, ppm): 9.12 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H of nitrobenzothiazole cycle), 8.24 (dd, J = 9.7 Hz, 2.4 Hz, 1H of nitrobenzothiazole cycle), 8.02 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.95 (dd, J = 15.4, 8.3 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.91 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H of nitrobenzothiazole cycle), 7.64 (t, 1H, Ar-H), 7.51 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.21 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 4.55 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H, –CH2–), 4.06 (s, 2H, –CH2–), 4.01 (s, 2H, –CH2–), 2.92 (dd, J = 13.1, 6.3 Hz, 2H, –CH2–). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ, ppm) yielded 180.6, 166.3, 166.2, 162.5, 153.4, 147.1, 144.9, 144.2, 133.9, 129.8, 129.7 (×2), 129.2 (×2), 127.6, 123.6, 119.7, 117.2, 113.8, 112.8 (×2), 62.7, 49.1, 46.6 and 15.8. Main FT-IR absorption peaks (KBr pellet, v cm−1): 3093 (Ar-H), 2959 (R-H), 2246 (CN), 1709 (CO), 1593, 1560, 1401, 1513, and 1326 (NO2), 1295, 1273, 1247, 1161 (C–O), 1139, 1123, 1099, 1069, 1023. MS (ESI+) was m/z (%) = 501.35 (100) [M+].
The absorption maxima of the synthesized dyes ranged from 582 to 592 nm in DMF, as shown in Fig. 3, which was assigned to the π–π* transition of the conjugated system. The UV-vis spectra of these dyes in different solvents were measured and the data are summarized in Table 1. The used solvents have different dielectric constants (εs), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 38.25), acetonitrile (CH3CN, 36.64), methanol (CH3OH, 32.60) and chloroform (CHCl3, 4.81). The absorption spectra of D1–D4 in DMF are shown in Fig. 3, and the absorption maxima (λexp) and extinction coefficients (ε) of the four dyes in solvents are shown in Table 1.
Samples | Molecule Mass | λexp (nm) | ε × 104 (L mol−1 cm−1) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMF | CH3CN | CH3OH | CHCl3 | DMF | CH3CN | CH3OH | CHCl3 | ||
D1 | 471.12 | 592.0 | 576.5 | 578.5 | 572.5 | 4.39 | 4.47 | 4.46 | 4.03 |
D2 | 471.12 | 591.0 | 576.5 | 574.0 | 570.0 | 4.24 | 4.33 | 4.35 | 4.06 |
D3 | 438.11 | 583.0 | 565.0 | 562.0 | 554.5 | 3.77 | 3.85 | 3.91 | 3.32 |
D4 | 500.13 | 582.5 | 564.0 | 563.5 | 553.5 | 4.02 | 4.08 | 4.09 | 3.77 |
As shown in Table 1, D1 and D2 exhibited almost the same λexp and ε in all four solvents, which is attributed to the carbonyl position on the ester moiety. A bathochromic shift from 591.0 nm of D2 to 583.0 nm of D3 was achieved by cyano of D3. Comparing D3 with D2, cyanoethyl replaced one ester group of the diester group. The cyano group is a strong electron-accepting group, making the aniline moiety weaker for electron-accepting compared to the diester aniline moiety, leading to a lower ε of D3 than D2. D3 and D4 also showed almost the same λmax in all four solvents because of the similar ester polarity. Comparing D4 with D3, the phenyl group conjugated with the carbonyl group of D4 to achieve higher ε than the alkyl linked carbonyl group of D3. The four dyes exhibited solvatochromic effect, a large red shift from CHCl3 to DMF, 19.5 nm for D1, 21 nm for D2, 18 nm for D3 and 18.5 nm were observed. The solvatochromism of the synthesized dyes was induced by the active proton migration caused by different polarities of the organic solvents.
To further study the photophysical properties of the dyes, TD-DFT simulations were applied. The simulated dipole moment (μ) and UV-vis absorption spectra, including the maximum absorbance (λc), corresponding μs and transition contribution of S0–S1 in solvents are summarized in Table 2.
Dye | Solvent | μ (Debye) | λc (nm) | ε × 104 (L mol−1 cm−1) | Transition contribution/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a S0 is the ground state (HOMO), S1 is the excited state (LUMO). | |||||
D1 (S0–S1) | DMF | 15.13 | 562 | 4.16 | 99.38 |
CH3CN | 15.18 | 558 | 4.05 | 99.34 | |
CH3OH | 15.52 | 567 | 3.85 | 99.17 | |
CHCl3 | 14.05 | 553 | 4.14 | 99.32 | |
D2 (S0–S1) | DMF | 8.96 | 555 | 4.09 | 99.39 |
CH3CN | 8.97 | 552 | 3.98 | 99.35 | |
CH3OH | 9.07 | 560 | 3.79 | 99.19 | |
CHCl3 | 7.97 | 542 | 4.08 | 99.31 | |
D3 (S0–S1) | DMF | 8.46 | 551 | 4.09 | 99.37 |
CH3CN | 8.44 | 548 | 3.99 | 99.34 | |
CH3OH | 8.42 | 556 | 3.80 | 99.18 | |
CHCl3 | 7.44 | 537 | 4.08 | 99.30 | |
D4 (S0–S1) | DMF | 9.67 | 554 | 4.21 | 99.37 |
CH3CN | 9.65 | 550 | 4.11 | 99.35 | |
CH3OH | 9.77 | 559 | 3.92 | 99.16 | |
CHCl3 | 8.81 | 540 | 4.19 | 99.30 |
The μ of those dyes was applied to estimate the polarity of the dyes, which was the product of the magnitude of the charge and the distance between the centers of the positive and negative charges. As shown in Table 2, the four dyes in the strong polar solvents, DMF, CH3CN, and CH3OH exhibited larger μ values than CHCl3. Apart from CH3OH, the λc and λexp of the four dyes exhibited the same bathochromic shift effect with decreased solvent εs. The obvious hypochromatic shifts and decrease of the ε values of the dyes in CH3OH were attributed to the protic solvent effect by a hydrogen bond between the dye molecules and CH3OH, which corresponded to higher μ in CH3OH.
The frontier molecular orbitals diagrams are shown in Fig. 4, HOMO is the π orbitals that existed in phenylazo moieties, meaning two phenyl rings linked by an azo bond, from the benzisothiazole section to phenyl rings. Comparing LUMO with HOMO, the electron distribution showed a slight change, which means S0–S1 was the local excitation caused by intramolecular charge transfer, the transition contributions were more than 99%, and CH3OH still the lowest among the four solvents, as shown in Table 2.
Fig. 4 Frontier molecular orbitals of dyes: L1–L4 are LUMO orbitals of D1–D4, and H1–H4 are HOMO orbitals of D1–D4. |
Samples | L* | a* | b* | C* | h° | K/S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | 22.19 | 15.09 | −30.47 | 34.00 | 296.35 | 18.64 |
D2 | 22.06 | 17.48 | −31.23 | 35.78 | 299.23 | 18.64 |
D3 | 23.72 | 21.45 | −29.93 | 36.82 | 305.62 | 17.15 |
D4 | 22.28 | 20.47 | −27.13 | 33.99 | 307.04 | 18.17 |
The absorption properties of these disperse dyes in the solution and the colorimetric properties of the polyester dyeing from such colorants are different. Although λexp of D1 and D2 was almost the same in the solution, obviously different color shades were observed with the naked eye, blue for D1 and purple blue for D2. D2 showed a redder shade than D1, which was attributed to a higher a* value. D3 dyed polyester fabric in hyacinth hue was distinct from D2, and exhibited a brighter hue than other analogues, which can be characterized using the increased a* value and decreased b* value in the negative. D3 and D4 showed almost the same λexp in the solution, D4 exhibited a higher ε value, which was attributed to a higher K/S value than D3. All four dyes achieved satisfactory color yields (K/S) leading to a heavy color depth at only 1% (o.w.f.) of the dye concentration.
As shown in Fig. 5(a), the synthesized dyes exhibited increased color yield with increased dye concentration under 1%, with no significant improvement with further increased dye usage. The aimed dyes were azo bond connected benzisothiazole and phenyl structures, and exhibited excellent co-planarity, as shown in Fig. 5(b), which facilitated stronger dye–fiber interaction. The lattice dimensions of D1–D4 were also evaluated with DFT simulation, which were 1103, 1091, 957, and 1379 Å3, respectively. D4 showed a much larger molecular volume than the other dyes. The lower color yield of D4 at higher concentrations of over 2% was attributed to its twisted terminal ethopabate-induced surge molecular volume.
To investigate π–π interactions between dyes and polyester fabrics, face-to-face configurations were applied, and polyethylene glycol terephthalate (PET) was expressed as polyester. The chromogen-PET (a1), cyanoethyl-PET (a2), and ester-PET (a3) intermolecular interactions and their π–π interaction were studied and the data are shown in Fig. 6.
Fig. 6 Intermolecular interaction models (a) and their π–π interaction models (b): green clouds mean π electron distribution. |
As shown in Fig. 7, a1–a3 interaction increases with the increased intermolecular distance with the minimum energy at 3.45–3.80 Å, which confirms the long-range interaction effect of the intermolecular system. The a1 configuration showed the minimum energy at 3.45 Å and −20.68 kcal mol−1, which was much larger than that of a2 and a3 configurations, the dominant dye–fiber interaction force was attributed to the chromogen skeleton. The a2 configurations showed the minimum energy at 3.80 Å, and exhibited stronger dye–fiber interaction than the a3 configuration, whose minimum energy was 3.50 Å at the similar minimum energy. The terminal groups, cyanoethyl and ester groups, showed obviously decreased interaction energy than the chromogen skeleton, which indicated that the chromogen skeleton plays the dominant role during the dye–fiber interaction.
Fig. 7 Intermolecular interaction energies of chromogen-PET (a1), cyanoethyl-PET (a2), ester-PET (a3). |
The fastness properties of the dyed fabrics, including rubbing fastness (dry and wet) washing fastness, sublimation fastness, and light fastness were evaluated using the grayscale rating (Table 4). Dry and wet rubbing fastness values of dyed polyester fabrics exhibited quite good dry and wet rubbing fastness with few exceptions. Ester-based dyes help to enhance affinity between the fiber and dye, enduring good rubbing fastness to the dyed fabrics. Ester-based dyes exhibited excellent washing fastness as expected, which can be attributed to the hydrolysis of pendant carboxylic acid ester groups. The bulk and polarity of synthesized dyes derived from ester-based coupling components exhibited high fastness to dry heat and achieved excellent sublimation.
Samples | Fastness to rubbing | Fastness to washing | Fastness to sublimation | Fastness to light | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry | Wet | SP | SC | SP | SC | ||
a SC = staining on cotton; SP = staining on polyester. | |||||||
D1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4–5 |
D2 | 4–5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
D3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4–5 |
D4 | 4–5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4–5 |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental and additional tables and figures for related components. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra06452b |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |