From the journal Digital Discovery Peer review history
Autonomous biomimetic solid dispensing using a dual-arm robotic manipulator
Round 1
Manuscript submitted on 24 Apr 2023![](https://www.rsc-cdn.org/pubs-core/2022.0.147/content/NewImages/icon-letter.png)
![](https://www.rsc-cdn.org/pubs-core/2022.0.147/content/NewImages/chevron-down.png)
13-Jun-2023
Dear Dr Cooper:
Manuscript ID: DD-ART-04-2023-000075
TITLE: Autonomous Biomimetic Solid Dispensing Using a Dual-Arm Robotic Manipulator
Thank you for your submission to Digital Discovery, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. I sent your manuscript to reviewers and I have now received their reports which are copied below.
After careful evaluation of your manuscript and the reviewers’ reports, I will be pleased to accept your manuscript for publication after revisions.
Please revise your manuscript to fully address the reviewers’ comments. When you submit your revised manuscript please include a point by point response to the reviewers’ comments and highlight the changes you have made. Full details of the files you need to submit are listed at the end of this email.
Digital Discovery strongly encourages authors of research articles to include an ‘Author contributions’ section in their manuscript, for publication in the final article. This should appear immediately above the ‘Conflict of interest’ and ‘Acknowledgement’ sections. I strongly recommend you use CRediT (the Contributor Roles Taxonomy, https://credit.niso.org/) for standardised contribution descriptions. All authors should have agreed to their individual contributions ahead of submission and these should accurately reflect contributions to the work. Please refer to our general author guidelines https://www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/author-and-reviewer-hub/authors-information/responsibilities/ for more information.
Please submit your revised manuscript as soon as possible using this link :
*** PLEASE NOTE: This is a two-step process. After clicking on the link, you will be directed to a webpage to confirm. ***
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/dd?link_removed
(This link goes straight to your account, without the need to log in to the system. For your account security you should not share this link with others.)
Alternatively, you can login to your account (https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/dd) where you will need your case-sensitive USER ID and password.
You should submit your revised manuscript as soon as possible; please note you will receive a series of automatic reminders. If your revisions will take a significant length of time, please contact me. If I do not hear from you, I may withdraw your manuscript from consideration and you will have to resubmit. Any resubmission will receive a new submission date.
The Royal Society of Chemistry requires all submitting authors to provide their ORCID iD when they submit a revised manuscript. This is quick and easy to do as part of the revised manuscript submission process. We will publish this information with the article, and you may choose to have your ORCID record updated automatically with details of the publication.
Please also encourage your co-authors to sign up for their own ORCID account and associate it with their account on our manuscript submission system. For further information see: https://www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/journal-authors-reviewers/processes-policies/#attribution-id
I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
Yours sincerely,
Professor Jason Hein
Associate Editor, Digital Discovery
************
![](https://www.rsc-cdn.org/pubs-core/2022.0.147/content/NewImages/icon-comments.png)
![](https://www.rsc-cdn.org/pubs-core/2022.0.147/content/NewImages/chevron-down.png)
Reviewer 1
This research paper presents a robotic 'automation' tool for solid dispensing. However, I believe that the data checklist from digital discovery doesn't quite apply here. The data repository contains the code but has no description of what any piece of code/folder means and what it should be used for. I suggest authors add as much information as possible to this repository so that it is easier for users (or data reviewers) to connect them back to different components mentioned in the paper.
Reviewer 2
This is a really nice piece of work that addresses a current problem in SDL, namely the addition of solids. I think the fuzzy logic control is neat and the basic idea is nice and worth publishing. I would however suggest the figures, particularly the data presentation figures are improved so the comparison between the techniques is easy to see. I'd also like some comment on how other parts of the SDL process - such as moving the material from the weighing station to the reactor might be addressed at least conceptually.
![](https://www.rsc-cdn.org/pubs-core/2022.0.147/content/NewImages/icon-response.png)
![](https://www.rsc-cdn.org/pubs-core/2022.0.147/content/NewImages/chevron-down.png)
Referee: 1
Comments to the Author
This research paper presents a robotic 'automation' tool for solid dispensing. However, I believe that the data checklist from digital discovery doesn't quite apply here. The data repository contains the code but has no description of what any piece of code/folder means and what it should be used for. I suggest authors add as much information as possible to this repository so that it is easier for users (or data reviewers) to connect them back to different components mentioned in the paper.
Response:
We thank the reviewers for bringing that to our attention. We reorganized the repo based on your constructive comments. To elaborate, we expanded the main readme file with helpful figures and more thorough description of the repo structure. Moreover, we have added readme files to each folder to better describe its content. Please see https://github.com/fourteenjiang/Solid-dispensing.git . We also added better representing videos, please see https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8082246.
Referee: 2
Comments to the Author
This is a really nice piece of work that addresses a current problem in SDL, namely the addition of solids. I think the fuzzy logic control is neat and the basic idea is nice and worth publishing. 1) I would however suggest the figures, particularly the data presentation figures are improved so the comparison between the techniques is easy to see. 2) I'd also like some comment on how other parts of the SDL process - such as moving the material from the weighing station to the reactor might be addressed at least conceptually.
Response:
We thank the reviewer for these positive remarks and comments. Our response to these comments as follows:
1) We changed figure 6, which presents our experimental results, so it is more concise and easier to follow.
2) We add on the paragraph on how the proposed solids dispensing station cooperates with other stations:
Future work will include technical improvements to the platform as well as its use in research applications. We envisage improved dispensing algorithms that incorporate self-learning for specific solids; it might also be feasible to incorporate visual feedback to augment the feedback from the analytical balance. This solid dispensing workstation is modular and could be extended by connecting it to other stations. For example, a mobile robot2 could be used to deliver additional empty vials to the station and to transport filled vials to other stations, such as a chemical synthesis station. We will also exploit the versatility of the dual-arm robot to incorporate other tasks into workflows beside solid dispensing. As an example, the dual-arm robot might double as a capping/decapping station for sample vials. Thinking more broadly, these results suggest that other biomimetic approaches could be developed where robots use relatively simply tools to reproduce, more or less, the operations carried out by human researchers, rather than building more bespoke automated laboratory devices.
Round 2
Revised manuscript submitted on 26 Jun 2023![](https://www.rsc-cdn.org/pubs-core/2022.0.147/content/NewImages/icon-letter.png)
![](https://www.rsc-cdn.org/pubs-core/2022.0.147/content/NewImages/chevron-down.png)
28-Jun-2023
Dear Dr Cooper:
Manuscript ID: DD-ART-04-2023-000075.R1
TITLE: Autonomous Biomimetic Solid Dispensing Using a Dual-Arm Robotic Manipulator
Thank you for submitting your revised manuscript to Digital Discovery. I am pleased to accept your manuscript for publication in its current form.
You will shortly receive a separate email from us requesting you to submit a licence to publish for your article, so that we can proceed with the preparation and publication of your manuscript.
You can highlight your article and the work of your group on the back cover of Digital Discovery. If you are interested in this opportunity please contact the editorial office for more information.
Promote your research, accelerate its impact – find out more about our article promotion services here: https://rsc.li/promoteyourresearch.
If you would like us to promote your article on our Twitter account @digital_rsc please fill out this form: https://form.jotform.com/213544038469056.
By publishing your article in Digital Discovery, you are supporting the Royal Society of Chemistry to help the chemical science community make the world a better place.
With best wishes,
Professor Jason Hein
Associate Editor, Digital Discovery
******
******
Please contact the journal at digitaldiscovery@rsc.org
************************************
DISCLAIMER:
This communication is from The Royal Society of Chemistry, a company incorporated in England by Royal Charter (registered number RC000524) and a charity registered in England and Wales (charity number 207890). Registered office: Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BA. Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7437 8656.
The content of this communication (including any attachments) is confidential, and may be privileged or contain copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any person other than the intended recipient(s) without the consent of The Royal Society of Chemistry. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please (1) notify us immediately by replying to this email, (2) delete all copies from your system, and (3) note that disclosure, distribution, copying or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
Any advice given by The Royal Society of Chemistry has been carefully formulated but is based on the information available to it. The Royal Society of Chemistry cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness of this communication or any attachment. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not represent those of The Royal Society of Chemistry. The views expressed in this communication are personal to the sender and unless specifically stated, this e-mail does not constitute any part of an offer or contract. The Royal Society of Chemistry shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss as a result of the use of this email and/or attachments, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided. The Royal Society of Chemistry does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free; The Royal Society of Chemistry has taken reasonable precautions to ensure that no viruses are contained in this email, but does not accept any responsibility once this email has been transmitted. Please rely on your own screening of electronic communication.
More information on The Royal Society of Chemistry can be found on our website: www.rsc.org
Transparent peer review
To support increased transparency, we offer authors the option to publish the peer review history alongside their article. Reviewers are anonymous unless they choose to sign their report.
We are currently unable to show comments or responses that were provided as attachments. If the peer review history indicates that attachments are available, or if you find there is review content missing, you can request the full review record from our Publishing customer services team at RSC1@rsc.org.