From the journal RSC Chemical Biology Peer review history

Protein conformational ensembles in function: roles and mechanisms

Round 1

Manuscript submitted on 30 Jun 2023
 

28-Aug-2023

Dear Dr Nussinov:

Manuscript ID: CB-REV-06-2023-000114
TITLE: Protein conformational ensembles in function: roles and mechanisms

Thank you for your submission to RSC Chemical Biology, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. I sent your manuscript to reviewers and I have now received their reports which are copied below.

After careful evaluation of your manuscript and the reviewers’ reports, I will be pleased to accept your manuscript for publication after revisions.

Please revise your manuscript to fully address the reviewers’ comments. When you submit your revised manuscript please include a point by point response to the reviewers’ comments and highlight the changes you have made. Full details of the files you need to submit are listed at the end of this email.

Please submit your revised manuscript as soon as possible using this link :

*** PLEASE NOTE: This is a two-step process. After clicking on the link, you will be directed to a webpage to confirm. ***

https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rsccb?link_removed

(This link goes straight to your account, without the need to log in to the system. For your account security you should not share this link with others.)

Alternatively, you can login to your account (https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rsccb) where you will need your case-sensitive USER ID and password.

You should submit your revised manuscript as soon as possible; please note you will receive a series of automatic reminders. If your revisions will take a significant length of time, please contact me. If I do not hear from you, I may withdraw your manuscript from consideration and you will have to resubmit. Any resubmission will receive a new submission date.

All RSC Chemical Biology articles are published under an open access model, and the appropriate article processing charge (APC) will apply. Details of the APC and discounted rates can be found at https://www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/about-journals/rsc-chemical-biology/#CB-charges.

RSC Chemical Biology strongly encourages authors of research articles to include an ‘Author contributions’ section in their manuscript, for publication in the final article. This should appear immediately above the ‘Conflict of interest’ and ‘Acknowledgement’ sections. I strongly recommend you use CRediT (the Contributor Roles Taxonomy, https://credit.niso.org/) for standardised contribution descriptions. All authors should have agreed to their individual contributions ahead of submission and these should accurately reflect contributions to the work. Please refer to our general author guidelines https://www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/author-and-reviewer-hub/authors-information/responsibilities/ for more information.

The Royal Society of Chemistry requires all submitting authors to provide their ORCID iD when they submit a revised manuscript. This is quick and easy to do as part of the revised manuscript submission process. We will publish this information with the article, and you may choose to have your ORCID record updated automatically with details of the publication.

Please also encourage your co-authors to sign up for their own ORCID account and associate it with their account on our manuscript submission system. For further information see: https://www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/journal-authors-reviewers/processes-policies/#attribution-id

Please note: to support increased transparency, RSC Chemical Biology offers authors the option of transparent peer review. If authors choose this option, the reviewers’ comments, authors’ response and editor’s decision letter for all versions of the manuscript are published alongside the article. Reviewers remain anonymous unless they choose to sign their report. We will ask you to confirm whether you would like to take up this option at the revision stages.

I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Yours sincerely,
Cai-Guang Yang, Ph.D.
Associate Editor/RSC Chemical Biology
Professor/Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, CAS
Phone: +86-021-50806029
Email: yangcg@simm.ac.cn

************


 
Reviewer 1

In this timely short review, the authors discussed the importance of considering protein conformational ensembles for understanding function, allostery and disease. The discussions started with a brief discussion of the general relevance of conformational ensembles, and then dived into more detail with several specific and representative examples that highlighted the roles of various post-translational modification, disease-causing mutations and interactions with lipid membrane in shifting the conformational distributions. These discussions support the conceptual framework that describes protein function and regulation in terms of the shifting conformational ensembles, rather than static and rigid structures. Overall, I find the manuscript to be well motivated, clearly written, with excellent up-to-date examples. I support the publication of this contribution in its current form.

Reviewer 2

Shortcomings of the energy landscape concept and the typical sequence-structure-function paradigm are in need of rethinking. This article by Nussinov and colleagues presents a new concept that incorporates conformational ensembles and the population of states to yield the sequence‐conformational ensemble‐function paradigm.

The manuscript could be accepted as is. However, if minor revisions are to be undertaken, two points would be worthy of consideration:
1. It could be helpful, particularly in the section discussing the K-Ras4B G12V mutation, specifically how or why visiting the active state more frequently is important for function.
2. Some sentences could use a small amount of editing for grammar, as some have awkward phrasing or abrupt ending. This is particularly notable in the first paragraph of the section covering Affinity and shift of the ensemble for Raf activation by Ras.

Overall the paper is interesting, of high quality, of good importance, and has good quality and helpful figures.


 

We thank the referees for the positive comments and appreciation of our Review. Below we address the comments.

** Referee: 1
In this timely short review, the authors discussed the importance of considering protein conformational ensembles for understanding function, allostery and disease. The discussions started with a brief discussion of the general relevance of conformational ensembles, and then dived into more detail with several specific and representative examples that highlighted the roles of various post-translational modification, disease-causing mutations and interactions with lipid membrane in shifting the conformational distributions. These discussions support the conceptual framework that describes protein function and regulation in terms of the shifting conformational ensembles, rather than static and rigid structures. Overall, I find the manuscript to be well motivated, clearly written, with excellent up-to-date examples. I support the publication of this contribution in its current form.
* Our response:
We thank the referee for these comments.

** Referee: 2
Shortcomings of the energy landscape concept and the typical sequence-structure-function paradigm are in need of rethinking. This article by Nussinov and colleagues presents a new concept that incorporates conformational ensembles and the population of states to yield the sequence‐conformational ensemble‐function paradigm.

The manuscript could be accepted as is. However, if minor revisions are to be undertaken, two points would be worthy of consideration:

1. It could be helpful, particularly in the section discussing the K-Ras4B G12V mutation, specifically how or why visiting the active state more frequently is important for function.
* Our response:
We now explained that “Visiting the active state more frequently is important for function since this results in the protein spending more time in the active, here oncogenic, state.”

2. Some sentences could use a small amount of editing for grammar, as some have awkward phrasing or abrupt ending. This is particularly notable in the first paragraph of the section covering Affinity and shift of the ensemble for Raf activation by Ras.
* Our response:
We now slightly touched that paragraph as well.

Overall the paper is interesting, of high quality, of good importance, and has good quality and helpful figures.
* Our response:
We thank the referee for the careful reading of the paper and the comments.




Round 2

Revised manuscript submitted on 29 Aug 2023
 

02-Sep-2023

Dear Dr Nussinov:

Manuscript ID: CB-REV-06-2023-000114.R1
TITLE: Protein conformational ensembles in function: roles and mechanisms

Thank you for submitting your revised manuscript to RSC Chemical Biology. I am pleased to accept your manuscript for publication in its current form. I have copied any final comments from the reviewer(s) below.

You will shortly receive a separate email from us requesting you to submit a licence to publish for your article, so that we can proceed with the preparation and publication of your manuscript.

All RSC Chemical Biology articles are published under an open access model, and the appropriate article processing charge (APC) will apply. Details of the APC and discounted rates can be found at https://www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/about-journals/rsc-chemical-biology/#CB-charges.

You can highlight your article and the work of your group on the back cover of RSC Chemical Biology. If you are interested in this opportunity please contact the editorial office for more information.

Promote your research, accelerate its impact – find out more about our article promotion services here: https://rsc.li/promoteyourresearch.

If you would like us to promote your article on our Twitter account @rsc_chembio please fill out this form: https://form.jotform.com/213543900424044.

We are offering all corresponding authors who are not already members of the Royal Society of Chemistry one year’s Affiliate membership as part of their APC. If you would like to find out more please email membership@rsc.org, including the promo code OA100 in your message. Learn all about our member benefits at https://www.rsc.org/membership-and-community/join/#benefit.

By publishing your article in RSC Chemical Biology, you are supporting the Royal Society of Chemistry to help the chemical science community make the world a better place.

With best wishes,

Cai-Guang Yang, Ph.D.
Associate Editor/RSC Chemical Biology
Professor/Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, CAS
Phone: +86-021-50806029
Email: yangcg@simm.ac.cn


 
Reviewer 2

Sufficient changes have been made so as to improve the manuscript.




Transparent peer review

To support increased transparency, we offer authors the option to publish the peer review history alongside their article. Reviewers are anonymous unless they choose to sign their report.

We are currently unable to show comments or responses that were provided as attachments. If the peer review history indicates that attachments are available, or if you find there is review content missing, you can request the full review record from our Publishing customer services team at RSC1@rsc.org.

Find out more about our transparent peer review policy.

Content on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Creative Commons BY license