Evaluating lithium recovery using electrochemical membrane separation: cost analysis and design strategies

Abstract

The increasing demand for Li-based chemicals necessitates advancements in sustainable recovery technologies. Ion-exchange membranes, such as Li superionic conductors, offer promising electrochemical solutions. However, the relationship between electrochemical fundamentals and techno-economic feasibility remains underexplored. This analysis presents a techno-economic evaluation of an integrated Li2CO3 production process, covering brine intake and pretreatment, direct electrochemical Li recovery, brine disposal, and LiCl conversion to battery-grade Li2CO3. We develop an optimization method that accounts for variations in brine composition (Li: 0.17–710 ppm) and Li-selective membrane prices ($500–$40 000 per m2) to establish stack design and operational guidelines to minimize energy and material consumption in producing 1 ton of Li2CO3 per day. We examine Li/Ca and Li/Mg selectivity, stack pressure drop limits, and operation at reduced recovery ratios. While a 20-bar pressure threshold is identified as optimal for cost savings, we highlight an alternative strategy – combining lower recovery ratios with adaptive electrochemical design – to further minimize costs without requiring higher pressure tolerance. While Li recovery from seawater remains costly, our findings indicate that for other brine sources, assuming a Li transference number of 1, production costs range from $2600 to $28 000 per ton of Li2CO3, with energy consumption varying from 5099 to 71 099 kWh, depending on Li concentration and membrane price. However, energy demand can increase by 170% to over 900% at lower binary selectivities of ∼22 to ∼5, primarily due to higher current density and voltage requirements. Our work provides guidelines on an efficient direct Li recovery from brines, paving the way to a more sustainable Li sourcing.

Graphical abstract: Evaluating lithium recovery using electrochemical membrane separation: cost analysis and design strategies

Supplementary files

Transparent peer review

To support increased transparency, we offer authors the option to publish the peer review history alongside their article.

View this article’s peer review history

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
04 Jul 2025
Accepted
15 Sep 2025
First published
23 Sep 2025

Green Chem., 2025, Advance Article

Evaluating lithium recovery using electrochemical membrane separation: cost analysis and design strategies

S. Neyrizi, K. Nevenzeel, D. J. Groenendijk, B. in ‘t Veen, J. Ledingham and P. J. Corbett, Green Chem., 2025, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D5GC03414K

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements