The pathway to net zero: a chemicals perspective

The global ambition is to reach a net zero waste and emissions society by 2050. For the chemical sector to align with these ambitions, it needs to ﬁ nd alternative resource ﬂ ows for organic chemicals and derived materials to continue to contribute to the global economy. The current linear approach of the chemical industry is incompatible with emissions reduction targets, social responsibility and sustainable growth policies, a circular economy is viewed as a solution to facilitate the transition towards a net zero society. This paper sets out the current state of play for emissions and waste management from the chemical industry in the EU and UK, a vision to reach a circular economy of chemicals to achieve the ambition of net zero by 2050, and the gaps emerging in the current ecosystem.


State of playemissions and waste
Chemical production is ubiquitous in all areas of our daily lives, the bres in our clothes, the food and drink we consume (and the packaging it is held in), the precious metals used to connect us to the rest of the world, homecare products and fuel for our vehicles and homes.With continued global population growth (9.7 billion expected by 2050) and consumption trends, the demand for chemicals is projected to grow four-fold by 2050 unless more sustainable models are implemented into society to reduce mass consumption. 1,2Chemical production is important in ensuring continued economic prosperity.The chemical industry contributes a staggering $5.7 trillion to the global economic output and supports 120 million jobs worldwide. 1However, the current consumption and production of chemicals has a large contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, with the chemical industry responsible for 16% of direct global CO 2 emissions alone. 3Greenhouse gas emissions associated with chemical production can be categorised into two key components, the rst is energy consumption and second is the feedstocks associated with producing chemicals.It is particularly energy intensive to make high-value primary chemicals such as methanol, ethylene, propylene, ammonia and BTX (benzene, toluene and xylene), which account for roughly two thirds of the sector's total energy consumption and a large portion of feedstock resource. 4lens serves as the building blocks for producing a wide range of products including polymers, bres, solvents and highvalue speciality material.These products are subsequently fed into several manufacturing and industrial sectors to create useable nal products.Short-chain olens, ethylene and propylene, are estimated to be produced at 200 Mt a year globally, the largest-volume petrochemical produced worldwide, their synthesis is the most energy-consuming process in the chemical sector. 5 The global carbon demand for organic chemicals and their derived materials currently stands at 450 Mt embedded C per year. 6Embedded carbon refers to the greenhouse gas emissions that arise from the whole production process of chemicals up to their point of use, for context, the UK reported total greenhouse gas emissions of 417 MtCO 2 e in 2022. 7At present, the feedstock used for organic chemicals comes largely from fossil-based resources, with an estimated 95% of all manufactured goods produced associated with petrochemical feedstock. 8The chemical sector must redesign pathways of olen production and other primary chemicals to achieve net zero scope 1-3 emissions goals and provide a platform to assist other sectors in their pursuit of net zero targets.
The chemical sector is responsible for large volumes of waste, both from industrial waste and post-consumer waste, oen ending in landll or polluting our natural environment.The use of landll for waste is not compatible for a healthy and sustainable planet, the avoidance of landll usage should be prioritised, which can be achieved in a circular economy.End-of-life products from primary chemicals, single-use plastics, combustion gases, and industrial and domestic waste put increasing pressure on waste management systems.Landll capacity will continue to diminish despite more waste being produced by an ever-growing global population.To redirect waste from landll, the European Union (EU) has introduced the landll directive and circular economy action plan, which entail achieving 55% municipal waste recycling rate by 2025 and 10% or less of total amount of municipal waste generated sent to landll by 2035. 9,10Members states of the EU are obligated to report their progress on meeting agreed targets.Despite Brexit, the UK has also adopted the municipal waste targets set by the EU. 11The department for Environmental Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) are required to produce progress reports on waste targets set by the waste framework directive.Fig. 1 illustrates the split of treatment of municipal waste (MW) in the EU and the UK for 2018 (later statistics not available for the UK).
While signicant progress has been made in recycling municipal waste, a signicant portion continues to be sent to landll.Incineration and other waste-to-energy technologies are being widely adopted to reach EU and UK waste targets, however there is still some concern over the emission abatement of incineration and whether it is a viable long-term sustainable solution.To control landll depletion, there is a pressing need to shi our focus toward a systemic priority change for products and waste, which can be underpinned by the waste hierarchy principles. 14ere we need to get to The chemical industry's current linear production route primarily consumes fossil feedstocks to make valuable products, which are generally discarded as waste at the end of the process.This production route is one of the major contributors to many world crises, such as global warming, energy shortages, competition for natural resources, and long-lasting damage to biodiversity.It is clear a more circular, resource efficient approach is required for the chemical sector to turn from a leading cause of global crises to a potential solution.
Introducing circularity into chemical production offers several key benets.It reduces the chemical industry's dependency on virgin petrochemical feedstocks, increase resource efficiency, and extend the lifetime of products across the supply chain, in addition to reducing carbon emissions where possible.Proposed technological changes to enable a circular economy of chemicals to operate are reviewed below, with a focus on the EU and UK.

Increasing resource efficiency
The waste hierarchy should be at the heart of any society that reduces waste to a minimum and increases resource efficiency (Fig. 2).By making materials safe and sustainable by design, products can remain in a closed loop system for longer, with the responsibility of products end-of-use distributed evenly along the supply chain and enforced through policy levers.
Materials and products should be tracked throughout the supply chain to ensure policy levers can be enforced and maintain a transparent supply chain, for example via a block chain analysis system. 15The UK government are currently consulting on the appropriate method of mass balance to be utilised for chemical recycling. 16Effective use of policy legislation to unify waste collection can provide improvements to the recycling process, allow for higher rates of mechanical recycling to occur, reduce process losses and maintain higher material grades to achieve Fig. 1 EU and UK municipal waste treatment statistics for 2018, original data taken and reproduced from Eurostat for EU and Defra stats on waste for UK. 12,13 zero-waste society.Consumers can play a key role in contributing to a zero-waste society when given the incentive to do so.An example of this is the deposit return scheme, a small deposit is paid when a shopper buys a beverage which they can receive if returned to a deposit system.The deposit return scheme has seen great success in countries such as Denmark, Germany and Lithuania, all of whom reported a high bottle return rate above 90% aer adopting this scheme.The EU has set a mandate of 90% for bottle returns for its member states by 2029 under the single use plastic directive, with other EU member states set to make deposit return schemes compulsory.17 The amount of deposit for a bottle can change depending on the type of material for the container, as seen with Germany's Pfand system.Single-use containers are xed at V0.25 and multi-use containers are set by the producer with a maximum of V0.25 deposit.Coupling societal change with technology and policy progression can ensure the principles of the waste hierarchy are maintained alongside a zero-waste society.

Reducing direct CO 2 emissions
Sustainable chemicals and energy use are inherently related when considering the thermodynamics of feedstock conversion.Using CO 2 utilisation as one example, CO 2 is below all primary chemicals in the thermodynamic energy well, to make primary chemicals there is an inevitable energy penalty for this conversion process.There are a number of established technologies for energy production currently available and capable of supplying power using different (and thus renewable) energy sources.The renewable energy mix technologies most well established are wind, solar photovoltaics (PV) and hydroelectric power.Nuclear power is also seen as a cleaner established alternative to fossil power.Smart grid networks and interconnectors such as the North Sea link, can improve trade of renewable energy and maintain a secure supply of energy on a multinational level.Signicant investment into hydrogen and hydrogen storage, such as the UK's investment into the Teesside industrial cluster, will enable hydrogen power to join the energy mix in the future, and can replace existing infrastructure currently relying on natural gas as a fuel source.
Short term effective strategies to decarbonise the chemical sector can be achieved through retrotting current industrial processes.Some processing equipment can be electried relatively easily, such as pumps and compressors and boilers which do not reach excessive temperatures. 18Electrifying logistical equipment on industrial sites, such as transport carrier systems, can also lay the foundation towards industrial sites reaching sustainability targets.Large-scale retrotting such as electrication of steam crackers are currently being explored with SABIC, BASF and Linde joining to develop an electrically heated steam cracker in 2023. 19he merit of emission reduction via electrication however largely depends on the energy source employed, as this process itself is energy intensive it would require a large supply of renewable electricity. 20,21Reforming crackers to use a higher content of blue hydrogen for heating can signicantly reduce the CO 2 emissions, with the source of hydrogen taken from fuel gas generated in the cracker.Sources of hydrogen can move away from classic steam reforming to electrical routes via water electrolysis, which has been proven at scale. 22

Replacing petrochemical feedstocks and valorising waste
The conventional production path to olens involves the steam cracking of hydrocarbons, from fossil feedstocks.The feedstocks range from light alkanes such as ethane or propane, to complex mixtures such as naphtha found in crude oil.Steam cracking uses extreme pressure and heat, which in turn is highly Fig. 2 Applying the waste hierarchy principle to the chemical sector, reproduced from ref. 14 with permission from https://www.gov.uk/,copyright 2011. 14nergy intensive and emits large quantities of greenhouse gases, in the order of 1-2 tonne of CO 2 for each tonne of olens produced.To develop a truly circular economy, not only the energy source but also the carbon feedstock used to produce olens and specialty chemicals needs to change.There are numerous examples of pathways being developed which can convert conventional waste streams into renewable feedstocks, and thus change the feedstocks employed to create chemicals.The three main feedstocks to displace fossil carbon comprise biomass, solid waste and captured CO 2 .As a case study, a set of routes for converting these alternative feedstocks into ethylene are detailed in the excerpt below.Through diversifying feedstocks and production methods, a more resilient supply chain can also be built.
A owchart summarising some of the routes to sustainable ethylene production from biomass, solid waste and capture CO 2 feedstocks at various technology readiness levels is shown in Fig. 3, with an accompanying table of abbreviations.

Direct conversion
Solid wastesorted polyolenic plastics can be depolymerised into their monomer building blocks through pyrolysis. 23O 2 conversion -CO 2 can be directly converted to olens via catalytic electrochemical reduction.24,25 Waste feedstock to intermediates Biomass -Biomass can be converted into intermediates such as methane and syngas via anaerobic digestion and gasication.19,26 Other thermal cracking routes such as pyrolysis and hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass can achieve a high bio-crude yield. 27 Prreated waste biomass can also be converted to ethanol via a fermentation process.Although the conversion of biomass feedstocks into bioethanol is currently running at a commercial level with over 5 billion litres a year produced in Europe, it is largely rst-generation ethanol from beet sugar feedstock.28 Instead, biomass waste feedstocks comprise wood, food waste, low quality crops, and sewage sludge.
Solid wastechemical recycling technologies are being deployed to convert solid waste back into their building constituents.The most common routes involve thermal cracking via either gasication, pyrolysis or hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL).Gasication with steam, oxygen or air as a gasifying agent can produce syngas as an intermediate feedstock and is tolerant to mixed plastic waste streams. 29Pyrolysis and HTL of polyolenic plastics, on the other hand, can produce a liquid oil alongside gases comprising short-chain alkanes and alkenes. 23,30,31Polyolenic plastics can also be broken down into alkanes via hydrogenolysis. 32,33O 2 conversionelectrochemical CO 2 reduction through the use of electrolysers can be used to convert waste CO 2 gas into syngas, and then further on to make primary chemicals and olens.24,34,35 Thermocatalytic conversion of CO 2 captured from ue gas or directly from air has also grown rapidly, with available routes to syngas, subsequently converted into olens and other high-value chemicals.[36][37][38][39] CO 2 hydrogenation provides another set of routes to intermediate feedstocks such as methanol 40 and ethanol.41

Intermediates to olens
Methanea key pathway from methane to olens is via oxidative coupling of methane. 42,43An indirect route is via reforming methane to syngas, then converting syngas to olens. 44yngassyngas can be converted to olens in a number of ways.The rst is via a Fischer-Tropsch synthesis to higher alkanes, followed by cracking to olens. 45Electrochemical reduction of syngas to olens is also feasible and currently being studied. 45,46An indirect route would be the synthesis of methanol from syngas, which can then be used to make olens from the methanol to olen (MTO) process.
Methanol and ethanolthe MTO route via dimethyl ether (DME) is a well-established process for the production of olens such as ethylene and propylene. 47The yield of ethylene from the MTO process is typically quite low for established processes, 48 but recent advancements have reported higher yields for ethylene and propylene. 49Projects to convert ethanol into ethylene have also been established for some time via dehydration. 50,51vision for a circular economy of chemicals With these principles in mind, a vision for a circular economy of chemicals can be drawn (Fig. 4).By continually keeping products and materials in a closed loop, net zero emissions and waste targets cannot only be achieved but continually maintained indenitely.Eventually, the need for processes such as energy from waste, shown in Fig. 4, can be phased out as more sustainable technologies mature.
Whilst the solution to effectively switch from a linear to circular approach seems a simple one, the implementation of circularity into the chemical sector comes with complexity.A whole systems approach which connects technology, industry, policy, nance and society is needed for the success of chemical circularity.The consideration of economic, societal and technological factors of a product's lifecycle need to be introduced as early as possible for circularity to succeed.
What strategies are being implemented?
The circular economy of chemicals is a focus for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) under Goal 12 of the Sustainable Development Goals, 'Responsible consumption and production'.The UNDP released a strategy on their interventions for proper chemical and waste management to achieve circularity in 2022. 52The G7 alliance on resource efficiency was created to connect researchers, industry, policymakers, private enterprises and relevant stakeholders to improve global resource efficiency.The 5 year Bologna roadmap (2017) outlines priorities for G7 countries towards achieving greater resource efficiency, which the G7 countries pledged to achieve. 53A similar commitment led to the Toyama framework on material cycles in 2016, via the G7 alliance, creating a framework for countries around the world to enhance resource efficiency and promote a circular economy. 54Many countries have also been taking action to curb plastic pollution, with over 60 countries introducing bans and levies on plastic packaging and single-use items.Notably, in March 2022, the UN adopted a historic resolution to end plastic pollution, committing to create an international legally binding agreement by 2024.A binding agreement in this area would be the rst of its kind globally.
France has laid out a visionary roadmap to reduce its carbon emissions, 'France 2030', backed by a V30 billion investment, with a clear emphasis on fostering innovation in its industrial sector. 55The roadmap includes a new target of 31% lower emissions by 2030, with measurable steps for lowering emissions across the sector.
The United States have set a number of ambitious targets towards a circular economy, with a number of strategies from the environmental protection agency and federal government including a dra national strategy to prevent plastic pollution.The recent ination reduction act incentivises organisations to move towards a clean energy economy and brought into effect at the beginning of 2023. 56s one of the largest producers of primary chemicals in the chemical sector, the chemical industry in China is continuing to grow.In response, China has set their peak CO 2 emissions by 2030 reaching 11.9 GtCO 2 , and a target to reach carbon neutrality by 2060. 57Their continual 5 year plans provide a detailed guidance for industrial sectors to reduce carbon emissions with the most recent 14th 5 year plan (2021-2025) focusing on circular economy goals. 58he EU has launched a chemicals strategy for sustainability as part of the European green deal. 59,60The strategy aims to promote the approach of 'safe and sustainable by design' towards chemicals, banning the most harmful chemicals in consumer products and to establish a 'one substance, one assessment' process to simplify the assessment of risks and hazards of chemicals.The chemicals strategy pushes innovation to promote the decarbonisation of the industry, whilst protecting the supply and sustainability of critical chemicals, which coincides with the European Critical Raw Materials Act. 61The European circular economy action plan sets out clear goals to achieve a wider circular economy and acts as a key pillar for the European Green Deal. 9he EU green deal and similar EU incentives have been adopted by the UK.The UK government and the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) funding agency are supporting projects from industry and academia towards the transition to net zero, through centres such as the National Interdisciplinary Circular Economy Research (NICER) programme.Fig. 5 gives a timeline of key UK and EU strategies related to the chemical industry.

The Netherlands, an example of a nationwide circular economy strategy
National pushes towards a circular economy on all levels can be seen from the example from the Netherlands.In 2016 the government set out a programme for a circular Dutch economy by 2050 with two key objectives, the rst is to halve raw material Fig. 5 EU and UK policy strategies and targets towards a net zero timeline.
consumption by 2030, and ultimately, to realise a fully circular economy by 2050.The program outlines various strategies and actions to transition the Netherlands towards a circular economy, with three underlying principles identied to accomplishing circularity: (1) Increase production process efficiency to reduce raw material usage.
(2) When raw materials are needed, use sustainable renewable raw materials to reduce the dependence on fossil fuel resources.
(3) Develop production processes and new products that are circular in nature.
To complement the strategy, a detailed timeline is given to forecast how the three goals will be achieved and eventually achieve a waste-free economy by 2050 on the government website.In 2017, a signicant milestone was achieved with the establishment of the raw materials agreement, a pact signed by government and representatives from industry to move towards renewable resources.The raw materials agreement led to the identication of ve key sectors (plastics, consumer goods, manufacturing, construction and biomass/food) that can have the greatest impact on the Dutch circular economy.Roadmaps dedicated to each sector were created to describe how each sector can transition to a circular economy.A subsequent circular economy implementation programme was set up to ensure the roadmaps for the ve sectors were then given measurable actions and projects from 2019-2023.Progress reports published by the Environmental Assessment Agency and annual national circular economy conferences help to monitor progress and adjust the implementation programme.
As well as leading the way with a national circular economy programme, the Netherlands have the ambition to turn Amsterdam into the rst circular city.Amsterdam partnered with Circle Economy to use their City Circle Scan tool identifying areas circular business models can be applied and how the models can be implemented practically.Like the ve key sectors for a Dutch circular economy, a roadmap and action agenda has been made for Amsterdam to become fully circular.

Where are the gaps emerging?
The common gaps emerging in the chemical industry provide major barriers to a circular chemical economy and are depicted in Fig. 6 and further discussed below.The gaps presented in Fig. 6 are ubiquitous across the whole supply chain, spanning technology, policy, professional training, public engagement, and nance.

Whole systems approach
Whilst there is no shortage of studies focused on developing low-carbon technologies for chemical manufacturing, a more holistic approach is needed to address to the environmental implications of renewable carbon technology beyond reducing emissions.When considering wider system boundaries, Steffen et al. have provided a planetary boundary framework to enable decision makers choose a suitable option for societal development. 62The planetary boundary framework incorporates regional and planetary level boundaries such as ocean acidication, land usage change, biodiversity loss and water intensity.Employing the planetary boundary framework should be practiced for both policy making decisions and strategies to ensure the well-being of society.Bardow et al. apply the planetary boundary framework to create a model for the production and end-of-life treatment of 90% of global plastics. 63Their bottomup approach concludes that recycling rates of at least 75% with a combination of renewable carbon-based plastics have the potential to operate safely within planetary boundaries.However, it is noted the demand, suitable resource production and waste management of plastics can vary by region.
The Dasgupta review highlights the urgent need to address biodiversity loss and ecological degradation, aligning to the goals of a circular economy. 64The Dasgupta review takes the approach of embedding our economies within nature to fully account for the impact of our demand for natures resources.The recommendations from the review look to couple sustainable practices with preserving nature.
Legislation can play a role in taking a long-lasting approach, such as the Welsh governments well-being of future generations act (2015), which requires public bodies in Wales to embrace a more long-term, whole-system approach to ensure decisions that are made will have a benecial effect on current and future generations.Approaches like this should be adopted in a wider UK and European context.

Technology readiness with funding gaps
The NASA technology readiness level (TRL) system is widely adopted and adapted across different sectors to assess technology maturity before deployment. 65  between TRL levels 1-3, with university research and government funding bodies typically tting into this category.TRL levels 4-6 are described as emerging technologies, with small and medium enterprises (SMEs), mature institutional projects, and government funding projects operate between these levels.TRL levels 7-9 are described as established technologies, which are oen dominated by the private sector.Despite technologies showing promise towards sustainable ethylene production, as shown in Fig. 3, the majority of the technologies are at the emerging stage.It should be noted that some of the technologies categorised as emerging technologies, are at higher TRL levels to produce other chemicals and precursors for olens.For example, hydrogenation of CO 2 to methanol has been industrialised in China, Iceland, and Norway 66 and many Fischer-Tropsch processes from syngas are currently used to make fuels at a commercial scale.Retrotting of traditional crackers, such as electried crackers and hydrogen-fuelled crackers are also still only at pilot scale.
The current ethylene production capacity globally from 2021 was 214 million metric tons, 67 based off an average increase of global capacity (calculated as 5% from 2018-2021), production capacity could reach 332 million metric tons by 2030.The scale of production of sustainable ethylene is far from matching the demand for ethylene production currently or with future forecasting.A common issue with the increase in production for sustainable ethylene lies with the energy intensity and associated cost of emerging technologies in comparison to steam cracking of natural gas and crude oil.Electrication of reforming processes will rely on a constant steady ow of renewable energy.The availability of renewable energy is known to uctuate over the course of a year, current steam reformers require 24/7 power for operation.Long term renewable energy storage capacity will be required to deal with intermittency in renewable energy generation for chemical production.A combination of renewable energy when there is sufficient sources and use of fossil-derived power when renewable energy sources uctuate could be a viable path forward until capacity reaches demand for renewable power.
The level of investment and risk greatly increases from an emerging technology (i.e.low level TRL) to an established technology (i.e.high TRL level), particularly for the chemical industry, which is a capital-intensive heavy industry.The difficulty for a company to receive the investment required to move from TRL 4-6 into an established TRL presents a large gap in the market, referred to as the 'valley of death', which oen prevents SME's from succeeding. 68Accenture conducted nancial research on the capital cost to achieve the EU Green Deal's net zero strategy through technology process routes of eight key chemicals; ammonia, ethylene, propylene, soda ash, nitric acid, carbon black, caprolactum and uorochemicals. 69Their analysis shows that V1 trillion investment is required to cover the modication of existing facilities for renewable chemical production of the 8 chemicals mentioned.The majority of the investment is associated with the standstill costs associated with loss of production due to retrotting of facilities and transformation of other chemicals to achieve net zero by 2050.The EU chemical industry is currently facing an investment gap of V12 billion a year to fund net-zero initiatives required.
Small and medium enterprises make up 96% of European chemical companies. 70Many SMEs are willing to move towards more sustainable practices, but oen do not have the resources for performing and obtaining detailed analytics, such as lifecycle assessment (LCA) or techno-economic analysis (TEA), to inform them of how to successfully transition to a circular economy.
Fig. 7 Technology readiness levels (TRLs) adapted for the chemical sector with highlighted technologies for sustainable olefin production.
Whilst there are a number of promising technologies that exist for feedstock conversion and end of life treatment, there are few mature technologies producing primary chemicals such as ethylene at the scale required to produce sustainable chemicals.Emerging technologies typically take ten years or longer to reach commercial level, with varying timescales for feedback of investment.
Not only does the lack of funding slow the uptake of new technologies, risk aversion and payback time are oen cited as barriers for emerging technologies to move to commercial operation.

Supply chain transparency and resilience
For supply chains to be transparent, there needs to be an effective way to track chemical use and cooperation between all stakeholder and parties across the whole supply chain, with a willingness to share information at all stages along the supply chain.The advancement in digital tracking methods, such as block chain analysis and mass balance methods, are being integrated with chemical supply chains for individuals in the industry.However, there is currently no effective system in place to ensure the chain of custody is maintained over a chemical's lifetime in the chemical sector.Companies will need to comply to honest and open data sharing, as resistance and reluctance to data sharing will inevitably hinder the ability to create transparent supply chains.
Sharing the critical raw materials needed for renewable feedstocks and renewable power technologies is of particular importance towards creating global circular supply chains.Supply chains of critical raw materials are global, with a small number of countries commanding a large share of upstream extraction processes and wider global competition for midstream processes.Recent geopolitical conicts have seen supply chains severely affected causing shortfalls, for example the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war has highlighted the overreliance on Russia to meet global energy demands and reliance on both nations for food and key minerals.To ensure resilience of supply chains, future supply chains need to incorporate a diverse mix of feedstocks and energy sources as the geopolitical landscape remains unstable.

Public acceptance of circular economy
The 'say-do gap' is a phenomenon which can be related to the public and business when considering sustainable choices. 71hilst consumers and businesses oen express their intention to make sustainable decisions, studies show these promises do not always align with the action.When clear communication from business and institution is lacking, the trust in circular products will be broken, greenwashing claims for sustainable products are damning examples of the breakdown in trust from business to the public.Priorities of consumers are dependent on the current social and political situation.During the current cost of living crises in the UK and across Europe, the immediate nancial concerns of everyday life understandably takes precedence over the sustainability considerations.The nancial burden should not be le to the consumer, but instead be assisted and empowered to make a more sustainable choice when buying goods.
There can also be a knowledge gap between a producer and consumer, particularly when considering recycling of plastic packaging.A recent campaign led by the Waste Resources and Action Programme (WRAP) called 'recycle now' attempts to encourage correct household recycling across the general public and avoid the spread of 'wishcycling', the belief a product is recyclable despite it not being.The campaign has been successful in public behaviour change with motivational clear messaging on packaging, the recycling locator tool, a database on recyclable materials and events such as recycling week.Knowing the nuances of which type of polymer can be recycled on current packaging is confusing and oen time consuming for everyone.Clearer messaging on packaging alongside campaigns such as 'recycle now' is needed for a greater uptake in correct recycling practices and creating higher quality waste streams for reuse and recycling.
A study by Lamb et al. explored the 'discourses of climate delay', where people and organisations oen accept climate change, but actually legitimise inaction or inadequate efforts, oen through misinformation and unsubstantiated claims. 72he common discourses are categorised into four typologies: (1) Redirect responsibility; redirecting responsibility places the impetus for change on someone else.An example of redirecting responsibility is the common argument made to not act, the carbon emissions of one nation grossly outweighs ours, so any action we take is pointless.
(2) Push non-transformative solutions; the belief that disruptive changes are not necessary to achieve net zero targets.A poignant example of this in the chemical industry is the technology optimism in the potential of enabling technologies.Instead of focusing on the infrastructure change required to bring the enabling technologies online, the business-as-usual model is continued in the hope that enabling technologies will ultimately provide the solutions required to decarbonise the industry.
(3) Emphasise the downsides of climate policies; by presenting only the downsides of climate policies such as the economic cost, there is a risk that no action is considered a better option than the perceived implications of climate action.
(4) Surrender to climate change.When points 1-3 are pushed and accepted the consensus leads to climate change is inevitable and any action that is taken is too little too late, so why bother.
Transparent campaigning can be an effective tool to mitigate these discourses and ensure correct messaging is delivered to the public, whilst showing that a circular economy is achievable and benecial to the global population.

Governance of strategies to meet global emission goals
As well as national strategies, industry and the private sector are setting their own net zero strategies and roadmaps.Whilst these are welcome moves towards net zero goals, there is a disconnect between creating such strategies and enforcing them.Reports from the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Climate Change Committee (CCC) show that the chemical sector is not on track for net zero by 2050. 73,74A recent study by the net zero stocktake shows that whilst over 90% of European countries have incorporated net zero strategies through policy documentation or law enforcement, more than half of countries globally are yet to set their own goals. 75trategies and roadmaps are oen cited as lacking the detail required to action the targets they set out.One such example is the UK government's 'Net Zero Strategy', which was found to be unlawful in a UK high court ruling. 73The strategy did not have the legally required information required to show how climate policies would meet the carbon budgets set out in the climate change act. 76ility of existing infrastructure to change An effective chemical management system is vital for any future circular economy of chemicals.A recent evidence report by Fidra highlighted that one important gap in the UK is the current chemical management infrastructure. 77Fidra identied the potential impact of chemical pollutants embedded in products for chemical circularity with respect to ame retardants used in mattresses.As a bulky waste item and an estimated 6.4 million disposed of in 2020, mattresses are a priority in the resources and waste strategy to divert mattresses from landll.However, some common ame-retardant chemicals in mattresses such as decabromodiphenyl ether (DBE-209), are difficult to reuse or recycle as chemical ame retardants are listed under the Stockholm convention.The case study found a combination of outdated rigid re safety regulations and a lack of chemical transparency presented major barriers to effective recycling of mattresses, without signicant contamination of harmful chemicals into making other products.
When considering the use of waste as a resource, effective sorting of waste should be a priority to maximise the recovery rate for waste.Inefficient and inconsistent waste collection is a key barrier oen cited.In Biffa's waste net zero report (2022), the starkest problem to meet 65% municipal recycling rate by 2035 was said to be a lack of provision for separate food waste collection for household and businesses. 78A potentially valuable resource (food waste) is sent to landll or energy recovery with the additional issue of contaminating other materials which would otherwise be t for recycling.In kerbside collection and sorting, there can be difficulties in determining a materials initial primary use (i.e., a high-density polyethylene milk bottle vs. high density polyethylene cleaning product), leading to mixed waste streams in the recycling process.For food packaging materials and similar product streams, waste streams need to be able to meet food-grade standards.One highlight of this is the UK plastic packaging tax, which requires that a minimum level of 30% recycled plastic content must be used in future plastic packaging.If the recycled polyethylene terephthalate plastic (rPET) waste streams are not efficiently sorted, food-grade waste streams can be contaminated and unt for use.
In some cases, technologies are available and ready to contribute towards reducing carbon emissions, but the current infrastructure cannot support this much needed change.Using renewable power generation as an example, in the UK power grid, renewable energy has increased power generation in the last decade from 2.5 GW in 2012 to 10.5 GW of power generated in 2022, a share of 35% of power generation for the UK. 79espite a strong performance in developing renewable energy technologies to meet the fossil fuel replacement demand (currently ∼30 GW fossil power), connection to the grid is a major challenge, with reports suggesting renewable projects can wait up to ten years to connect to the grid. 80The UK government recently released their Powering up Britain strategy, which aims to secure energy security through diversi-cation of energy sources. 81The strategy acknowledges infrastructure issues with the grid by setting up the Nationally Signicant Infrastructure Project (NSIP) to increase the uptake of renewable projects to the UK grid.

Skills gaps
As the industry changes, the skills required of the workforce will also need to change for more circular practices i.e. effective resource management strategies, sustainable raw material procurement, sustainable process design.A recent study undertaken by the Royal Society of Chemistry found that 68% of professional chemists believed there was a gap between current chemical knowledge and what is required for future green jobs. 82Universities keep introducing new courses into their syllabi and creating doctoral training programmes that focus on sustainable chemistry and chemical engineering, with businesses also introducing carbon literacy programmes for their employees by working with the carbon literacy project.As part of the EU Green Deal, the EU has introduced the European sustainability competence framework (GreenComp), to act as a common source for educators, and to provide training programmes that teach sustainability at all ages and education levels.

Effective engagement
National research centres can work alongside industry, non-prot organisations, governments, and funding bodies to ensure a circular economy of chemicals is achieved.However, one common problem found with multidisciplinary groups and projects is clarity in conveying technical subject matter, when members of the project have different expertise.The individual who is communicating information assumes other individuals have similar background and depth of knowledge to understand the information, oen referred to as the "curse of knowledge".Examples should be taken from the 'National Circular Hotspots' as created in the Netherlands, and from the Finnish 'National Roadmap to a Circular Economy', to illustrate how effective engagement can drive a circular economy.The messaging is clear and simple, making it easier for many working groups to understand the role they can play in a national circular economy.
Metrics play a large role when it comes to engaging in the transition towards a circular economy within the chemical industries.To make informed funding decisions, comparable metrics are required to determine best practice and to help inform the most effective levers for sustainable change.The analytical techniques used to measure circularity can vary depending on the performance indicators, making direct comparisons for greater resource efficiency difficult.A unied assessment criteria when analysing a processes sustainability and feasibility (Life Cycle Assessment and Technoeconomic analysis) needs to be in place.The international organisation for standardisation (ISO) has released ISO 14040 for the principles and framework for life cycle assessment analysis (LCA), 83 however does not go into depth on methodologies for each phase of an LCA.The ISO are currently creating a framework for standardised eco-technoeconomic analysis under ISO 14076 for commonly accepted best practices for process systems at all scale. 84Guidelines for LCA for Carbon Capture and Utilisation by Muller and Katelhon et al., 85  Simplied metrics can help reduce the difficulty of assessing a technology's suitability or comparing a range of candidate technologies to improve circularity in the chemical industry for decision makers.Simplied metrics can also help overcome the barrier of public acceptance, by giving relatable metrics and data to the general public.Consequently, if everyone understands the data on circularity, there will be a greater drive from the public and decision makers towards new and sustainable approaches.

Conclusion
The myriad of strategies, pledges and action plans depict an encouraging perspective for the chemical industry to achieve net zero, however the evidence of progress towards those goals have been found wanting.Whilst there are a number of solutions emerging for the chemical industry to transition towards net zero goals in the UK and EU, there a signicant number of gaps that must be overcome to achieve net zero.The vision towards a circular economy of chemicals has been set out and the gaps to enable this vision are apparent.Whilst it is clear industry, government and the public are willing to ll the gaps presented, a unied whole systems approach from the chemical industry is still required to facilitate this change.The chemical industry must not lose sight of the signicant role it can play within a circular economy, creating a safe, resource efficient society within stable planetary boundaries.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Flow diagram of alternative sustainable routes to ethylene with accompanying table of abbreviations.

Fig. 4 A
Fig.4A vision for a circular economy in the UK and EU chemical sector.
Fig. 7 is a schematic example of TRLs for the chemical sector with conversion technologies for ethylene production.Fundamental technologies lie

Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Common gaps emerging in the chemical industry towards a circular economy of chemicals.
go into greater detail to try to unify LCA studies with respect to CCU.Guidelines such as Muller and Katelhon et al. should be applied to other lowcarbon technologies.