Balancing act: influence of Cu content in NiCu/C catalysts for methane decomposition

Thermal catalytic decomposition of methane is an innovative pathway to produce CO2-free hydrogen from natural gas. We investigated the role of Cu content in carbon-supported bimetallic NiCu catalysts. A graphitic carbon material was used as a model support, and we combined operando methane decomposition experiments in a thermogravimetric analyzer with in situ electron microscopy measurements. The carbon yield was maximum with around 30% Cu in the nanoparticles. Adding more Cu drastically lowered the carbon solubility in the metal nanoparticles, which lowered the initial reaction rate and overall carbon yield. In situ TEM measurements showed that the addition of Cu to the catalysts strongly influenced the metal nanoparticle shape and size during carbon growth, and the growth mode. NiCu particles were larger, remained spherical and facilitated steady CNF growth. In contrast, pure Ni nanoparticles fluctuated in shape, sometimes fragmented, and showed stuttering CNF growth. This was ascribed to fluctuating coverage of part of the Ni nanoparticle surface with amorphous carbon, which increased the chance of total encapsulation and hence deactivation of the individual Ni nanoparticles. This supports a picture where balancing the carbon supply, transport, and nucleation of amorphous and crystalline carbon is crucial. Our results also highlight the importance of combining statistically relevant measurements with microscopic information on individual nanoparticles to understand overall catalytic trends from the combined behavior of individual catalyst nanoparticles.


Introduction
][7][8] The reaction can be divided into three main steps: (1) methane dissociation -carbon supply, (2) carbon diffusion typically through the metal nanoparticle -carbon transport, and (3) carbon nanostructure formation. 9,10However, next to the desired crystalline carbon also undesired carbon deposition can take place, which can deactivate the metal nanoparticle by encapsulation.The balance between these steps determines how long the reaction can proceed without catalyst deactivation as well as the final carbon nanostructures that are formed. 11any parameters influence the reaction, e.g.3][14][15] Depending on the operating temperature, the rate-determining step can be methane dissociation or the nucleation of and growth of ordered carbon structures, while the main reaction product can shift with increasing temperature from full, solid fibers to hollow fibers. 107][18][19][20][21][22] However, a disadvantage is that these catalysts deactivate quickly.To overcome this problem, the use of bimetallic catalysts has been widely explored.4][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] NiCu catalysts usually provide higher activities and longer lifetimes than Ni catalysts and their use increases the optimal reaction temperaturewhich allows for higher conversions. 29,31However, the exact role of Cu and why it is so beneficial is not clear yet, especially not its influence on the individual nanoparticle level.
Copper catalysts are utilized for graphene growth with chemical vapor deposition, which is typically performed at temperatures between 800 and 1000 1C. 34,35Yet, due to the filled d-band of Cu, it is much less active for methane decomposition than Ni.Therefore, the role of Cu must be due to altering the properties of the catalytic metal nanoparticle.Suelves et al. and others reported that a dilution effect by the presence of Cu could improve methane adsorption and hence carbon fiber growth. 15,17,23,26Promoting carbon diffusion by an increased lattice constant was also postulated. 23Carbon solubility might be important and is greatly impacted by changes in the electronic structure. 9,36,37Xu et al. reported stabilization of larger particles as a cause for the improved activity 27 since they facilitate a more steady growth. 27,38Turaeva et al. noticed that the electronic structure, especially the position of the top of the d-band with respect to the Fermi level is of key importance for nanostructure growth, 9 which is changed by alloying Ni with Cu. 39 To understand overall macroscopic observations on the influence of catalyst composition on catalytic performance, it is essential to also have a closer look at the individual particles. 38In this work, we will dive deeper into the role of Cu, combining a thermogravimetric analyzer to follow carbon growth under operando conditions with in situ electron microscopy to understand the impact of composition on the behavior of individual nanoparticles.We studied a series of Ni-based catalysts with varying Cu content (0-62%), using graphitic carbon as a model support to limit metal-support interaction. 40,41This allowed us to demonstrate that the CNF growth modes of Ni and NiCu particles differ greatly, and how the rates of different steps have to be balanced to obtain a maximum carbon yield.

Catalyst preparation
For this study, catalysts were prepared using incipient wetness (co-)impregnation.First, 4 M stock solutions were made by dissolving Ni(NO 3 ) 2 Á6H 2 O (Z97%, Sigma Aldrich) or Cu(NO 3 ) 2 Á 3H 2 O (99%, Sigma Aldrich) in Mili Q water.The solutions were acidified with HNO 3 to obtain a pH B 1, well below the pointof-zero charge of the carbon support (B4) hence optimizing electrostatic interaction between the positively charged support surface and the negatively charged nickel nitrate complex.These stock solutions were combined to obtain the desired ratios for preparing the different catalysts.A carbon support (xGnPC-500, XG Sciences) was impregnated (90% of the pore volume, V p,total = 0.87 mL g À1 ) with the precursor solutions.The carbon support consisted of thin carbon sheets, graphene nanoplatelets, with a surface area of B500 m 2 g À1 .The support was used as received without any modification.Table 1 gives an overview of the preparation details of a series of five catalysts.After impregnation, the samples were dried under dynamic vacuum at room temperature overnight.For the sequential impregnation, the sample was dried under dynamic vacuum at room temperature in between the two impregnation cycles and dried again after the second cycle.The metal nitrates were decomposed into oxides during heat treatment at 330 1C in N 2 (200 mL min À1 g À1 ) for 2 hours.Finally, the catalysts were reduced at 350 (catalyst 1), 330 (catalyst 2) or 280 (catalysts 3-5) 1C in 5% H 2 /Ar for 3 hours (5 1C min À1 ).

Methane decomposition in a thermogravimetric analyzer
The methane decomposition experiments were performed in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA, TGA5500, TA Instruments) with an IR furnace connected to a mass spectrometer (Discovery II MS, TA instruments).The gas feed flows horizontally over the catalyst bed, the catalytic setup is shown in Fig. S1 (ESI †).
Before starting the experiments, the system was purged with Ar (100 mL min À1 ) for 1 or 2 hours, to remove the oxygen from the sample chamber.Thereafter, the sample was dried at 70 1C in Ar (50 mL min À1 ) for 15 min.This was followed by in situ reduction at 350 (Ni/C), 330 (2) or 300 (3-5) 1C in 5% H 2 /Ar for 75 min (5 1C min À1 ).
Then, the sample was heated up to reaction temperature (5 1C min À1 ).After 2 min equilibration at reaction temperature, the reaction gas was introduced.The experiments were performed with 30% CH 4 in Ar (total flow 50 mL min À1 ) at 500 and 600 1C.No other gaseous products other than H 2 or (residual) CH 4 were detected during the experiments.
All experiments were performed in duplo.To correct for the difference in metal loading all measurements were normalized per gram of metal (Ni plus Cu).The differences between the duplo measurements were below 10%.Examples of the duplo measurements are shown in Fig. S2 (ESI †).
The growth rate was calculated by taking the derivative of the carbon accumulation with respect to time.The initial growth rate therefore is taken as the first point of the derivative.

Methane decomposition using in situ transmission electron microscopy
The gas-cell transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments were performed on a Talos F200X (Thermo-Fischer Scientific), equipped with a field-emission gun operated in TEM mode at 200 kV, roughly following the methodology described in our previous work. 38The electron dose rate was kept below 10 e À Å À2 s À1 , to limit the influence of the electron beam. 38A 40-mm objective aperture was used.A 4k Â 4k Ceta camera was used to acquire bright-field TEM images, with an exposure time of 1 or 2 s.Image series were recorded with a pixel size of approximately 1 nm with 2048 by 2048 pixels.
The in situ TEM experiments were performed in a dedicated gas-cell system (Protochips Atmosphere 210) including a

Paper Materials Advances
sample holder, gas supply system, and a heating control unit.
The cell within the sample holder consists of a top and bottom chip, which were joined using o-rings to separate the airtight inner cell compartment from the high vacuum of the microscope.One of the chips contained a silicon carbide-based heating membrane used for closed-loop temperature control using the resistance of the silicon carbide.Both chips contained six 30-50 nm thick silicon nitride windows which allowed imaging with the electron beam while containing the gas within the cell.The gas supply system had tanks in which gases could be mixed before they were flowed towards the sample holder.The two chips were glow-discharged (Cressington Power Unit 208) for 30 seconds prior to the experiment.Then a dilute pre-reduced catalyst in ethanol was dropcast approximately 20 times (0.5 mL per time) on the chip containing the heating membrane.Subsequently, the cell was assembled in the dedicated holder and checked for potential leaks.After the holder was inserted into the microscope, it was first flushed with Ar for 5 minutes at 0.1 sccm at 1 bar.Subsequently, an in situ reduction step in 5% H 2 and 95% Ar at 1 bar (0.1 sccm) at 300 1C was performed for 45 minutes.The temperature was then increased to the reaction temperature (600 1C) at 2 1C s À1 .The reaction gas (10% H 2 , 30% CH 4 , and 60% Ar at 1 bar, 0.1 sccm) was introduced at the moment that 600 1C was reached.
Data analysis was performed in ImageJ (version 1.53c).To measure the length of the carbon fibers, we identified a fiber of which the length could be reliably measured.This means that there was a reference point on the fiber that did not move during the measurement time.The length that the fibers had grown in a time frame of 15 to 30 s was measured.The change in length divided by the time between the first and next frame was used to calculate the average CNF growth rate for that particle.The particles often changed growth direction within this time frame, which led to CNFs that were not straight.In those cases, the distance from the reference feature to the first corner was measured, followed by the distances between corners, and lastly, the distance between the last corner and the particle, using the segmented-line feature in ImageJ.Sometimes multiple carbon structures grew from the same particle at the same time.The sum of the changes in length of all these structures was then taken to determine the carbon structure length growth rate from that specific metal particle.

Characterization of the fresh and used catalysts
H 2 -Temperature Programmed Reduction (TPR) was performed on an AutoChem II 2920 apparatus (Micromeritics).B50 mg heat-treated catalyst (sieved fraction 38-75 mm) was loaded in a U-shape tube in between quartz wool.First, the sample was dried at 120 1C.Thereafter, the TPR profile was measured from 30-500 1C (5 1C min À1 ) in 5% H 2 /Ar (flow = 40 mL min À1 ).A thermal conductivity detector (TCD) was used to obtain the reduction profiles.To check for support methanation, an MS signal was recorded on a Hiden Analytical mass spectrometer.N 2 -physisorption at 77 K was performed to determine the BET surface areas and pore volumes of the carbon support and the reduced catalysts.This was done on a Tristar II Plus apparatus (Micromeritics).The samples were dried overnight under vacuum at 170 1C before analysis.The BET surface area was determined in the relative pressure range of p/p 0 = 0.02-0.1.The total pore volume was determined from the adsorbed quantity at p/p 0 = 0.995.Results are shown in Section S3 of the ESI.† Powder X-ray Diffraction (XRD) was performed on a Bruker D2 Phaser 2nd Generation diffractometer with a Co radiation source (l = 1.7889Å).A sealed dome was used to measure the reduced catalysts under inert atmosphere.A Thermo-Fischer Scientific Talos F200X was operated at 200 kV in TEM mode to capture bright-field images of the catalyst.Scanning transmission electron microscopy Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (STEM-EDX) mapping was used to map the distribution of Ni and Cu in the catalysts before catalysis.ICP analysis of the metal weight loadings was performed by the Mikroanalytisches Laboratorium Kolbe.

Catalyst structural properties
A series of Ni-based catalysts containing 0-62% Cu was synthesized.The metal weight loadings were determined with ICP and are listed in Table 2.Note that since the Ni weight loading was kept constant, the total metal weight loading varies -for example the total metal loading in the Ni 38 Cu 62 is 26% while the metal loading of Ni 84 Cu 16 is 12.8%.The total surface area and pore volume of the reduced catalysts were determined based on N 2 -physisorption isotherms (Fig. S3, ESI †).The shape of the isotherms is similar for all catalysts indicating that the support structure was not significantly affected by the catalyst preparation.The BET surface area of the catalysts with 0-44% Cu are similar (250-270 m 2 g À1 ), but the surface area of the catalyst containing 62% Cu is lower (174 m 2 g À1 ).This is probably a result of the higher total metal loading of this catalyst.The total pore volume ranges between 0.30-0.48mL g À1 (Table S3.1, ESI †).
The reduction profiles of a series selected catalysts are shown in Fig. 1a.For the monometallic Ni-catalyst, multiple peaks are observed which can be ascribed to the reduction of

Materials Advances Paper
NiO to Ni, weakly or more strongly interacting with the support. 42,43The reduction profile of NiO changes by introducing Cu in the system.A Cu/C reference is shown in the dashed line.Fig. 1c shows the onset temperature of the reduction as a function of Cu content.There is a peak shift to lower temperatures with increasing Cu content in the catalysts, consistent with what is known from literature. 23This is in line with Ni and Cu being present as an alloy. 10,44,45Starting from 300 1C support methanation plays a role for all catalysts, 10,40 an example of the corresponding methane MS signal for the reduction profile of the Ni/C catalyst is shown in Fig. S4a (ESI †).By monitoring the sample weight during in situ reduction in the TGA (Fig. S5, ESI †), we confirmed that the reduction was completed before starting catalysis.X-ray diffraction patterns of the selected reduced catalysts are shown in Fig. 1b.There is no indication of NiO or Cu x O in the samples, meaning that the samples are fully reduced.Diffraction peaks at 2y = 30, 52, and 641 are attributed to the graphite support. 46The dotted lines indicate the (111) and (200) reflections for metallic Ni (green) and Cu (black).Fig. 1d shows the peak maximum of the (200) peak as a function of Cu content.This peak was used as it does not overlap with the carbon support peaks.The (200) peak in the bimetallic particles is found at intermediate positions with respect to pure Ni and Cu.This is again in line with alloy formation. 29,47Note that the intensity of the peaks varies for the different catalysts due to different total metal weight loadings (Table 2).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was utilized to assess the size and dispersion of the catalyst particles (Fig. 2).Fig. 2a and d 2. Details on the particle size distributions are available in the ESI † (Fig. S6 and S9).The average particle size of the Ni/C catalyst is 7.7 nm, somewhat smaller than that of the NiCu/C catalysts, which range from 10 to 11 nm.Previous research indicates that NiCu particles are mobile and susceptible to sintering during pre-treatment processes. 10Therefore, particle sizes were documented at both 500 1C and 600 1C prior to initiating the reaction.
Fig. 2b, c, e and f shows high magnification scanning transmission high angle annular dark field electron micrographs (Fig. 2b and e) along with corresponding energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) maps (Fig. 2c and f

Paper
Materials Advances temperature of 500 1C in Ar atmosphere.Additional EM images and EDX maps are shown in Fig. S7 and S8 (ESI †).Overall, the two metals were well mixed in the particles, yet some regions seemed to be more Cu or Ni-rich.Fig. S10 (ESI †) shows an evaluation of the copper content in particles with different sizes, to verify whether the Cu content was dependent on the particle size.Although larger particles tended to contain more copper, the variations in overall Cu content across the different as-prepared samples were large enough to outweigh the variations due to particle size.Furthermore, as the particles coalesce during reduction and catalysis, trends in the active catalyst nanoparticles are expected to be less pronounced.

Methane decomposition -macroscopic observations
The catalysts were tested, in duplo, at 500 and 600 1C with 30% CH 4 /Ar in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA).For each catalyst, Fig. S2 (ESI †) shows the carbon yield as a function of time, including the individual duplo or triplo measurements.Fig. 3 presents the evolution of the carbon growth rate at 500 (a) and 600 1C (b).The monometallic Ni/C catalysts initially exhibited rapid growth, yet fully deactivated after 10 minutes at 500 1C.Unfortunately, the Ni/C at 600 1C hardly showed any carbon growth (Fig. S11, ESI †).The Cu-containing catalysts sustained the growth of carbon for significantly longer periods than the monometallic Ni-catalyst.
It is interesting to evaluate both the trends in initial growth rates and final carbon yield.Table S3 (ESI †) lists r 0 and the total carbon yield for all catalysts.The initial growth rates (r 0 ) are shown in Fig. 4a.At 500 1C, the Ni/C and Ni 84 Cu 16 /C catalysts showed similar initial growth rates.Increasing the Cu content further in the catalyst particles, induced a decrease in initial growth rate.This effect is even more pronounced at 600 1C.For example, r 0 is three times higher for catalysts containing 15-25% Cu with respect to 60% Cu.The initial growth rate of the Ni/C at 600 1C could not be properly determined as that catalyst deactivated very quickly.
Fig. 4b shows the final carbon yield at 500 and 600 1C after deactivation (240 or 60 minutes, respectively).The Ni/C catalyst yielded the lowest carbon due to quick deactivation.Introducing 15-25% Cu enhanced the carbon yield, but further increasing the Cu content beyond 30% led to a decrease.Catalysts containing 15-25% Cu showed similar initial growth rates at 500 1C as the Ni-catalyst but without rapid deactivation, resulting in longer sustained growth and, finally, more product.However, a higher Cu content slowed the reaction down, reducing the carbon yield.A maximum yield was achieved with

Materials Advances Paper
30% Cu.The influence of temperature was less pronounced for higher Cu contents.
Several explanations for the influence of Cu are reported in literature, such as improved methane adsorption, 15,17,23,26 promoting carbon diffusion by an increased lattice constant, 23 or stabilization of larger particles 27 which provides more sustainable growth. 27,38Also, a dilution effect is mentioned: by the presence of inactive Cu at the catalyst surface, fewer active surface sites are available.Consequently, the reaction rate becomes slower. 26,29Yet, we postulate that yet another factor might play an important role: the solubility of carbon in Ni-Cu nanoparticles. 1 Besides the ability to dissociate methane, one other reason that transition metals are used for this reaction is that these have a high carbon solubility. 1,22,23,48icholson determined the solubility of carbon in NiCu alloys with different Ni/Cu ratios at 1000 1C. 36It was shown that the solubility does not change in the range of 0-25% Cu, yet, exceeding 30 wt% Cu the carbon solubility steadily decreases to zero.This was assigned this to a correlation between the density of states at the Fermi level and the carbon solubility.
Stocks, Willams, and Faulkner calculated the density of states (DoS) of Ni-Cu alloys over the whole stoichiometric regime. 49For pure copper, the Fermi level (E F ) is located at the top of the d-band, while for pure Ni the Fermi level is positioned within the d-band.Upon adding small amounts of Ni to Cu, there is a noticeable shift in both the shape and position of the d-band.By increasing the amount of Ni, a new band starts to form in the middle of the Cu d-band and E F .When the Ni content exceeds 40% the structure starts to resemble that of pure Ni.According to the work of Nicholson, the change of the DoS at the Fermi level explains the trend in the solubility of carbon as a function of Cu content in Ni-Cu alloys. 9The largest changes in DoS were observed between 40-60% Cu in the alloys.
In Fig. 5, the grey data points show the carbon solubility determined by Nicholson (left y-axis).To illustrate the effect of the solubility, the initial growth rates determined in our study are shown in orange squares (500 1C) and blue triangles (600 1C).The dashed line shows the expected trend of decreasing initial growth rate if solely caused by a dilution effect.As at 500 1C, we are operating in the regime where methane dissociation is limiting, 10 a linear decrease should be expected.Clearly, the trend in r 0 more closely resembles the trend in the carbon solubility with Cu content (orange solid line) determined by Nicholson.It should be noted that the solubility data were obtained at a somewhat higher temperature, although this is not expected to change the general trends.Interestingly, the same trend holds for the initial growth rates in the hightemperature regime (blue triangles).
The balance between carbon supply, transport, and nanostructure growth is clearly key for sustained carbon growth. 11,38he results described above suggest that diffusion of carbon through the metal nanoparticle is rate limiting, with carbon transport being the product of the concentration of mobile species and their mobility.1][52] As the trend of the initial growth rate lies a bit below the trend of the solubility as a function of Cu content, it might be that this driving force slightly decreases due to a

Paper
Materials Advances lower methane dissociation rate due to the dilution of Ni with Cu at the surface.However, overall the trends of initial growth rate and carbon solubility match very well, strongly suggesting that the decrease in carbon solubility, and hence the supply of carbon to the location of carbon nanostructure growth is the dominant factor.The optimum in carbon yield can be explained as the addition of Cu initially keeps the active surface clear of too high concentrations of amorphous carbon and prevents catalyst encapsulation.However, excessive Cu addition significantly lowers the carbon solubility and hence growth rate, and consequently leads to a lower overall yield at high Cu concentrations.
Raising the temperature from 500 to 600 1C, not only raises the methane dissociation rate but also increases the carbon solubility in Ni particles. 53This leads to a higher saturation concentration and a larger number of carbon atoms in the system.Yet, the carbon precipitation rate, which is the limiting step in this high-temperature range, 10 remains unchanged.Consequently, the driving force for diffusion diminishes, leading to carbon accumulating at the catalyst surface.Hence the fast deactivation at 600 1C (Fig. 3a).

A microscopic picture
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the carbon nanofibers grown over the Ni 74 Cu 26 and Ni 38 Cu 62 catalysts are shown in Fig. 6.The average fiber diameters were evaluated based on the TEM images, they are listed in Table S3 (ESI †).The size distributions are shown in Fig. S13 (ESI †).Commonly, the fiber diameter is closely related to the size of the fiber they grew from.For all catalysts the average fiber diameter is larger than the catalyst particle size before catalysis.This indicates that during the reaction, catalyst metal nanoparticles grow, resulting in larger metal particles and thicker carbon fibers being grown out of them.
Two types of fibers were observed: hollow fibers (Fig. 6b) and full fibers (Fig. 6c).The fraction of hollow fibers is generally higher at 600 1C than at 500 1C for the NiCu catalysts, which is ascribed to a change in the rate-determining step for nanofiber growth. 10Methane dissociation is the limiting factor at low temperatures, while the carbon structure formation is limiting at higher temperatures -leading to more formation of hollow fibers.With increasing amounts of Cu in the samples, fragmentation of the metal particles is observed -especially at 600 1C (Fig. 6d).This is a known deactivation mechanism for Ni-Cu catalysts. 47,54Fragmentation mainly happens at higher temperatures when the catalyst particles become easy to deform.The fragmentation process is strongly influenced by the Ni/Cu ratio, as an increasing Cu content decreases the melting point of the nanoparticles. 47,54n the second part of this study, we zoom in on the individual particle level using in situ TEM.This technique can provide additional (essential) insights into the carbon nanostructure formation.Where the TGA experiments provide meaningful statistical data, in situ TEM provides information about individual particles, while being relevant for reactor-scale studies. 38e performed methane decomposition TEM experiments at atmospheric pressure at 600 1C.The gas composition was 30% CH 4 , 10% H 2 , and 60% Ar.Hydrogen gas was required for reliable imaging conditions. 38A schematic of the gas cell and the temperature profile is described in our previous work. 38fter the gas cell was introduced in the microscope, the sample was first dried under Argon at 100 1C.Next, an additional in situ reduction was performed on the pre-reduced catalyst for 45 minutes in 5% H 2 in Ar (300 1C for NiCu samples, and 330 1C for Ni samples).Next, the temperature was raised to 600 1C.The reaction gas was introduced as soon as the reaction temperature was reached.At this moment CNFs started growing as can be seen in Movie S1 (ESI †).Snapshots of different moments in time during the in situ TEM experiments are shown in Fig. S14  (ESI †).
Zooming in on the carbon growth from individual particles gives more insight into the origin of the difference between Ni nanoparticles and those richer in Cu.Fig. 7a and b shows snapshots taken from CNF growth of single particles of pure Ni (a) and Ni 74 Cu 26 (b).Examples of additional individual particles can be found in Fig. S15 (ESI †).There are two main differences in the CNF growth induced by the presence of Cu.First, the Ni particle shape fluctuates significantly in time, while the NiCu particles did not show this behavior (Fig. 7c and d and Fig. S16 and S17, ESI †).Interestingly, this behavior is opposite to what would be expected based on the lower melting temperature of Cu.Second, the carbon growth rate of the NiCu sample is relatively constant in time, while the carbon growth from the Ni In other words, Ni particles show a pulsedlike growth.This might arise from the formation of a thin amorphous carbon layer around the Ni particle.The Ni particle is (temporarily) deactivated, and no CNF is grown for some time.However, when encapsulation is not complete, the Ni particle can deform and ''escape''.Now, fresh Ni surface is exposed for methane molecules to adsorb, leading to an increase of the fiber growth rate. 1,55The formation of the thin amorphous layer arises from a disbalance in the rates of carbon supply, transport, and CNF formation.By the addition of Cu (up to 25%), the formation of this amorphous layer is prevented leading to a smoother CNF growth.The smooth and stable CNF growth from NiCu catalysts results in the longer lifetime of these catalysts compared to Ni catalysts.
For larger particles and particles with a high percentage of Cu, multiple fibers grow from a single particle (Fig. S18, ESI †), which ensures smooth growth as the carbon concentration gradient in the particle remains relatively steep.Movie S4 (ESI †) shows a 60 nm NiCu particle growing multiple fibers.The smooth growth from NiCu particles and stuttering growth from Ni particles support our earlier discussion on the changing balance between carbon supply, transport, and nucleation.

Conclusion
The influence of copper concentration (0-62%) in carbonsupported bimetallic NiCu catalysts for methane decomposition was investigated.The gravimetric methane decomposition experiments provided operando data on the carbon yield, revealing that an alloy containing 30% Cu yielded an optimal carbon yield, balancing a reasonably high growth rate (related to the carbon solubility in the metal nanoparticle) with a long catalyst lifetime.The dilution of the Ni surface by Cu effectively keeps the active surface clear and prevents catalyst encapsulation.However, too much copper negatively impacts both the reaction rate and yield by greatly reducing carbon solubility.Ni particles were found to fluctuate in shape and facilitate stuttering CNF growth, probably due to reversible coverage of part of the nanoparticle surface by amorphous carbon deposits.On the other hand, particles containing 26 wt% Cu were larger, remained spherical and showed smooth CNF growth.Our findings underscore the importance of combining statistical and nanoscale techniques to understand the behavior of ensembles of nanoparticles and of balancing the Ni/Cu ratio to optimize catalyst performance and lifetime in methane decomposition.
displays the fresh Ni 84 Cu 16 and Ni 74 Cu 26 catalysts.Additional images of these catalysts, heated to 600 1C, along with images of the other fresh catalysts, are presented in Fig. S6-S8 (ESI †).The average particle sizes are summarized in Table Fig. 1 (a) Reduction profiles of selected catalysts with different Ni : Cu ratios (5 1C min À1 in 5% H 2 ).A Cu reference shown in dotted line.(b) X-ray diffractograms of the reduced catalysts normalized to the carbon peak at 301.Dotted lines indicate the reflections of the (111) and (200) planes of metallic Cu (black) and Ni (green).(c) The onset temperature of first reduction peak as function of Cu content.Data point of 100% Cu (gray) was taken from literature, 10 the reduction profile is shown in Fig. S3.3b (ESI †).(d) Peak position of the (200) peak as a function of the Cu content.Peak position for 100% metallic Cu (gray) was obtained from ref. 46.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Transmission electron microscopy images with low magnification (left), HAADF STEM (middle) and corresponding EDX maps (right) of the fresh Ni 84 Cu 16 (top, a-c) and Ni 74 Cu 26 (bottom, d-f) catalysts after heating to reaction temperature of 500 1C in Ar.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Evolution of the carbon growth rates over NiCu catalysts with varying Ni : Cu ratio at 500 (a) and 600 (b) 1C.The Ni/C catalyst lost all activity instantly at 600 1C and is therefore excluded from the figure.30% CH 4 /Ar, total pressure = 1 bar.

Fig. 5 (
Fig. 5 (left axis) Solubility of carbon (wt%) in Ni-Cu alloys with varying Cu content at 1000 1C as determined by Nicholson. 36Gray solid line indicates the trend.(right axis) Initial growth rates derived from the methane decomposition reactions at 500 1C (orange squares) and 600 1C (blue triagnles).Orange solid line indicates the trend.Dashed black line indicates an alternative model: the dilution effect.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6 TEM images of the reaction products.(a) Carbon nanofibers grown over the Ni 74 Cu 26 catalyst at 500 1C.(b) Hollow CNFs grown over the Ni 74 Cu 26 catalyst at 600 1C.(c) Example of a full fiber grown over the Ni 38 Cu 62 catalyst at 500 1C.(d) Fibers grown over the Ni 38 Cu 62 catalyst at 500 1C.Example of fragmentation.

Table 1
Preparation conditions catalysts

Table 2
Catalyst properties a Based on ICP.b Number-averaged particle size (diameter) as determined using TEM.