A tutorial mini-review on nanoporous carbons from biosourced compounds: ordered hierarchical nanoarchitectures through benign methodologies

b Ordered hierarchically porous carbons exhibiting micro-and mesopores are state-of-the-art porous structures with extraordinary performance in a range of applications ( e.g. , electrochemistry, catalysis, water treatment). Nevertheless, they are mostly prepared using petroleum-based chemicals, through resource-and energy-intensive, environmentally unfriendly processes. In this tutorial mini-review, we highlight major limitations in the methodologies, and showcase important achievements towards developing more sustainable synthetic strategies. Compared to multi-step hard-templating/nano-casting procedures, soft-templating techniques can provide more e ﬃ cient, benign, and direct ways to produce these nanostructures. The original soft-templating method, using Pluronic® surfactants as structure-directing agents and phenolic resins as carbon precursors, has been substantially modi ﬁ ed over the years in light of sustainability issues. The formaldehyde crosslinker has been replaced with more benign, less toxic alternatives ( e.g. , glyoxal), and catalyst-free crosslinking approaches have been developed. Furthermore, the use of biobased building-blocks for the carbon precursor, such as lignin, plant-derived polyphenols ( e.g. , tannins), and various saccharides ( e.g. , D -glucose, D -fructose), has also been explored. Novel techniques, such as the coordination-induced self-assembly, mechanosynthesis, and modi ﬁ ed hydrothermal treatment strategies are amongst the greenest processes developed so far. We give some critical comments on ongoing research in this ﬁ eld and point towards important research directions.

A tutorial mini-review on nanoporous carbons from biosourced compounds: ordered hierarchical nanoarchitectures through benign methodologies

Introduction
Carbon structures constitute an intriguing class of materials that play a signicant role in advancing a sustainable future.For example, carbon bres help to produce "green" lightweight fuel-efficient composites for the transportation industry that reduce CO 2 emission, and graphite is a state-of-the-art carbon used in important energy storage devices (lithium-ion batteries and beyond) or in solar panels to harvest renewable solar energy.Nevertheless, despite carbon being used for green applications, many of these structures in use, or under development, are derived from non-renewable resources (e.g., carbon bre from petroleum-based precursors, natural graphite through mining or synthetic graphite from petroleum reneries) clearly compromising our sustainability aspirations.][3] Nanoporous carbons have a more "complex" architecture compared to common carbon structures, and consequently, it is more difficult (still challenging) to fully characterise them, and to produce well-designed materials for advanced applications.These materials gained considerable interest in charge storage devices such as supercapacitors, owing to the large amount of available surface (sometimes thousands of square meters per gram material) to store energy through electrostatic or electrochemical interactions. 4,5Supercapacitors are expected to be important devices for our sustainable future; they not only help making more efficient energy storage systems, but they are also crucial elements in renewable energy utilisation devices (solar panels, wind turbines, etc.). 5,6Furthermore, nanoporous carbon electrodes are being developed for capacitive deionisation (CDI) devices, a technique with great premises to compete with energy-intensive desalination technologies (e.g., reverse osmosis, distillation) in the future due to its low cost, as well as a reduced energy consumption and lower environmental footprint. 7The need for such systems is expected to become more prevalent in the years to come as climate change pushes us towards severe water shortage problems in every corner of the world.Nanoporous carbons showed outstanding performance and gained appreciable interest as electrodes for the oxygen reduction reaction as well. 8,9In addition, these carbon structures show promise for water purication systems on account of their fascinating photochemical activity, 10 and potential for metal-free carbocatalysis. 11For these reasons, nanoporous carbons are expected to be crucial players for a sustainable water-energy nexus in the future (see Fig. 1; water and energy are interdependent resources, i.e., we need energy to produce water and vice versa, this connection is referred to as the "waterenergy nexus"). 12nfortunately, methods to prepare well-designed ordered nanoporous carbons are mostly limited to environmentally unfriendly technologies with large carbon footprint, involving petroleum-derived oen hazardous reactants together with energy-and resource-wasteful processes.Although some progress has been made on using biomass-derived carbon precursors, state-of-the-art ordered nanoporous carbons from biobased building blocks (through sustainable synthesis methods) are still far from being realised.In this tutorial minireview, we shed light on major challenges in this eld, in order to stimulate more research in this direction.Once basic methods are developed, there will be expanding horizons for applications (if we think about the myriad of opportunities residing in doping these nanoporous structures).

Tailoring the pore network in nanoporous carbons
The performance of nanoporous carbons greatly depends on the pore network that determines the diffusion of ionic species within its structure, and the accessibility to the active sites.The surface chemistry is also important, governing ionophilicity (wettability) of the pores, determining the presence/absence of faradaic pseudocapacitive or parasitic irreversible reactions in electrochemical applications. 4,13Chromophores or catalytically active moieties on the surface may be advantageous in photochemical and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). 10,11As an example, persulfate activation, a promising AOP for wastewater treatment, 14 has been studied on various carbon materialsthe mechanism of activation and the nature of reactive species (e.g., radicals, singlet oxygen or reactive complexes on the surface) were strongly connected to the carbon structure. 11With respect to catalytic groups on the surfaceit was shown for example that carbonyl groups play a role in peroxymonosulfate activation on an ordered mesoporous carbon (CMK-3) and on multiwalled carbon nanotubes, 15 on carbon spheres, 16 and on graphene oxide, 17 yielding sulfate radical anions (SO 4 c − ).Nanoporous carbons can provide an intriguing platform for persulfate activation or for other carbocatalysis processes as well, on account of the possibility of an advantageous cooperative pollutant adsorption-degradation process. 18In addition, in photocatalysis N-, S-, and O-containing groups on nanoporous carbons may act as chromophores. 10Furthermore, the carbon nanostructure determines the electronic properties of the material, and has an inuence on charge transfer processes in electrochemical devices. 19,20g. 1 Some of the emerging applications of nanoporous carbons for supporting a sustainable water-energy nexus.2][23] Hierarchical pore network structures are quite common in Nature.Such design allows efficient mass transport across multiple length scales following Murray's law observed in leaf veins, and in vascular and respiratory systems (Fig. 2A and B). 24,25Materials designed according to this law (coined as Murray materials) can provide exceptional performance in a range of applications (photocatalysis, gas sensing and electrochemical applications) on account of their advantageous mass-transfer properties. 25,26Nature achieved material design with structural control and interactions across multiple length scales through the nano-micro-macro level, leading to advanced functions and properties.Hierarchically designed bioinspired structures are at the forefront of materials science; this topic has been comprehensively addressed in a recent review. 27As a rst example, a multi-step process to create a hierarchically designed porous carbon material (Fig. 2C), along with SEM and TEM images on this fabricated scaffold can be seen in Fig. 2D-F.The micrographs highlight the presence of face-centred cubic macropores (Fig. 2E; around 150 nm diameter) with window-like pores (Fig. 2E; 60-80 nm diameter), and mesopores (Fig. 2F; around 18 nm diameter). 23Micropores were created in this mesomacroporous scaffold using KOH activation (by mixing with excess KOH (twice the weight of carbon) in water, followed by thermal treatment under Ar atmosphere at 800 °C).The construction of such architecture usually cannot be achieved in one step as can be seen in Fig. 2C, although this would be certainly desired in consideration of sustainability metrics, such as the E-factor (environmental factor, dened as the mass of waste per mass of product), material-and energy-efficiency. 28g. 2 (A and B) Hierarchically designed pore network to achieve efficient mass transfer following Murray's law. 26 As a more common strategy, mesoporous carbons are designed using so or hard-templating methods, 29,30 and micropores are usually drilled into the wall of these mesopores using various activation methods (chemical or physical activation). 31A frequently adopted so-templating strategy uses triblock copolymer Pluronic® surfactant micelles as structure directing agents along with the carbon precursor phloroglucinol (Fig. 3A).Micropores are then created into the wall of the mesopores using KOH activation (see the changes in porosity based on N 2 adsorption experiments in Fig. 3B).For KOH activation, the mesoporous carbon was impregnated with excess amount of KOH (4 times the weight of carbon) in water rst, followed by water evaporation at 100 °C, and then thermal treatment under N 2 atmosphere at 700 °C. 32This and similar systems will be at the focus of our later discussions.The robust so-templating method was originally developed by Liang and Dai in 2006, allowing the large-scale preparation of periodically ordered mesoporous carbons for the rst time. 33mong the activation techniques aimed at creating micropores in various carbon structures, KOH activation has gained much popularity, as it provides one of the most efficient ways to obtain high micropore volume and surface area (can be as high as 3000 m 2 g −1 ).During the process, carbon is mixed with KOH (usually at a weight ratio several times that of the carbon) followed by a thermal treatment under inert atmosphere in a temperature range of around 600-900 °C. 34The resulting activated carbon subsequently needs to be washed thoroughly to remove remaining chemicals.It was proposed that the following events take place during KOH activation: (a) various redox reactions between potassium species and carbon occur, such as in eqn (1)-(3) below; (b) H 2 O and CO 2 formation during the chemical activation contributing to pore evolution processes (these are actually referred to as physical activation processes); (c) the formation of elemental K in-between graphitic layers leading to lattice expansion aer removing K during the washing step, further contributing to the microporosity. 34In contrast, physical activation methods that use oxidizing gases, such as CO 2 , O 2 , and steam, require higher temperature regimes (∼600-1200 °C), longer time, and yield lower surface area and micropore volume.Nevertheless, KOH is an aggressive chemical agent that needs to be used in excess amount compared to the weight of carbon, and an additional washing step is also needed, which is not the case for physical activation.
Periodically ordered mesoporous carbon systems with uniform pore shapes and sizes have gained appreciable interest due to their advantageous and unique properties for various applications.In electrochemical applications for example, it has been shown that ordered mesoporous carbons can have exceptionally high gravimetric capacitance, 35 and are also superior in terms of their volumetric performance due to their compact porous structure. 36Moreover, very recent theoretical calculations further conrmed the superiority of an ordered mesoporous system with narrow pore size distribution over that of a disordered porous structure. 37The ordered mesoporous network can spatially conne the electrolyte promoting accelerated diffusion kinetics, and for the disordered porous network it appears that a signicant amount of the carbon can be inaccessible for the ions on account of the tortuosity of the pore walls, thus not contributing to charge storage.
According to our present understanding, an ordered mesoporous network with uniform pore sizes that can provide access to the micropores in the walls of the mesopores (i.e., a hierarchical interconnected network), can be considered the epitome of nanoporous carbons with extraordinary performance.These features are important for a range of applications where high surface area (provided by the micropores) and facile mass transport (through a mesoporous network) to the active sites on the surface play a role.Mesopores are large enough for the easy diffusion of molecules, or ions with their hydration shell.Furthermore, ordering in the mesoporous system is benecial as it can lead to the formation of interconnected mesoporous channels under certain conditions, further enhancing mass transport throughout the material. 35,36,38The applications of such well-designed nanoarchitectures cover a large area of research, e.g., electrochemical storage and conversion, catalysis, adsorption and separation, and biomedical research.Interested readers are directed to comprehensive reviews that detail the applications of hierarchically-structured porous carbons, 21 mesoporous carbon nanoarchitectures, 39,40 and in particular ordered mesoporous carbons. 30,38To design such nanoarchitectures, petroleum-based precursors and poreforming agents are at the forefront.The aim of this tutorial mini-review is to highlight environmentally benign processes to fabricate these materials, together with the use of biosourced compounds with low environmental footprint.

Biobased nanoporous carbonstop-down vs. bottom-up strategies
2][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] Most of the studies in this topic focus on using the entire part of plants (e.g., nut shell), 51 microorganisms (e.g., Tremella) 52 or animal residues (e.g., sh scale). 53Such source materials are directly carbonised at high temperatures (under inert atmosphere [i.e., pyrolysis], usually above 400 °C by applying low heating rates <10 °C min −1 and several hours holding time at the target temperature), 50 followed by an activation process.We may call these approaches "top-down" strategies (Fig. 4, le side).The biobased nanoporous carbons thus prepared can have a hierarchical pore structure with high surface area (>1000 m 2 g −1 ) and pore volume (>0.5 cm 3 g −1 ) thanks to the activation process creating micropores.Nevertheless, highly disordered nanoporous carbons can be achieved in this way, with little or no control on the developing nanoarchitecture, which is mostly determined by the structure of the starting material.Therefore, state-of-the-art controlled carbon nanoarchitectures (e.g., a periodically ordered interconnected meso/microporous scaffold) cannot be realised.To obtain controlled porous nanoarchitectures from biosourced building blocks, we propose "bottom-up" approaches from bio-derived molecular building blocks (Fig. 4, right side).In the following sections, we focus on introducing methods that can be grouped into the bottom-up strategies.

Hierarchically designed ordered mesoporous biobased carbons with micropores via templating methodsemphasis on soft-templating systems
Ordered mesoporous carbons can be fabricated via hard or sotemplating methods.For a typical hard templating method (Fig. 5), an ordered mesoporous silica template is prepared rst, from silica/surfactant mesophases (a) aer removing the surfactant (b).This hard template is then lled with the carbon precursor (c) and is subjected to a carbonisation process (d).
The ordered mesoporous carbon is thus obtained aer removing the template (e) via a chemical etching procedure, yielding the negative replica of the original template.In some places this hard-templating method is referred to as a nanocasting strategy.Various biosourced carbon precursors have been explored to successfully prepare ordered mesoporous carbons via the hard-templating method, such as sucrose, glucosamine and furfuryl alcohol. 54Moreover, it was shown that cellulose nanocrystals are able to direct the formation of surfactant/silica mesophases, enabling the room temperature synthesis of highly ordered mesoporous silicas (SBA-15). 55This indicates the possibility of preparing the silica around a carbon precursor directing the porous structure.Nevertheless, we cannot consider the multistep, time-consuming hardtemplating method that generates appreciable amount of waste a sustainable approach.Furthermore, during the etching process, concentrated bases (NaOH) or dangerous toxic acids (HF) are used.
A more sustainable, direct way to produce ordered mesoporous carbons is provided by the so-templating method (Fig. 5B).In this case, carbon precursor-surfactant selfassemblies (f) are directly converted to the ordered mesoporous carbon (g).Such method was rst reported by Liang et al. in 2004, based on the self-assembly of polystyrene-block-poly(4vinylpyridine) block copolymers together with resorcinolformaldehyde resin as the carbon precursor. 56The introduction of commercially available Pluronic® F127 amphiphilic triblock copolymer (EO 106 PO 70 EO 106 ) as micelle-forming structure-directing agent (Fig. 5C) by Tanaka et al. 57 led to the widespread application of this method.Later, Liang and Dai 33 in 2006 introduced the phloroglucinol-formaldehyde platform (Fig. 5D) as carbon precursor that gained much popularity due to the robustness (wide composition ranges) and mild reaction conditions.It should be noted that compared to the hard-templating methods, these systems are more difficult to realise, as several factors need to be considered to construct such self-assemblies.First of all, (1) the components of the system need to self-assemble into the precursor nanostructure: the surfactant needs to form stable micelles in the presence of the carbon precursor, which arranges around the micelles and forms important secondary interactions.In case of the typical so-templating method, phloroglucinol forms hydrogen bonding interactions with the polyethylene oxide domains and self-assembles around the micelles, which is a critical prerequisite for the formation of the nanostructure.There are also requirements regarding the thermal properties of the components.The structure-directing agent needs to be (2) stable at the curing temperature of the carbon precursor leading to a stable polymeric scaffold, and needs to act as a (3) sacricial agent that almost completely decomposes at the carbonisation temperature.In addition, the carbon precursor needs to convert to a (4) graphitic carbon structure at the carbonisation temperature while the sacricial agent decomposes and the ordered nanostructure is kept (typically, compared to the precursor nanostructure, there is always a contraction observed in the resulting carbon structure at high temperature).Ordered mesoporous carbons with various symmetries can be realised, such as 2-D hexagonal p6m (see Fig. 5B), body-centred cubic Im3m, and bicontinuous cubic Ia3d geometries, by varying the ratios of the components. 58,59Furthermore, the size of the pores can be controlled by adding hydrocarbon swelling agents to the system. 58

Towards more sustainable so-templating systems
Although certainly more sustainable than hard-templating methods, the so-templating technique is not without limitations.Several studies have demonstrated the application of more benign crosslinkers for phloroglucinol compared to the toxic formaldehyde.Mayes et al. 60 showed that glyoxal can also be used as crosslinker for the so-templating method.Glyoxal however reacts more slowly than formaldehyde.The authors noted the similarity of the phloroglucinol/glyoxal system to that of resorcinol/formaldehyde, 61 as phloroglucinol reacts faster with formaldehyde than resorcinol.They observed ordered 7.5 nm pores with uniform sizes, together with larger pores up to 200 nm in diameter.Such hierarchical porosity was not observed in formaldehyde/phloroglucinol system, 33 and the authors also ruled out the possibility of spinodal decomposition due to a secondary solvent.Using glyoxal, the formation of a stable intermediate probably slows down the crosslinking process.It was pointed out that glyoxal was responsible for the formation of the hierarchical structure, although the mechanism has not yet been claried.The LD 50 value of glyoxal (orally 3000 to 9000 mg kg −1 body weight for rats) 62 is much higher compared to formaldehyde (orally 500 to 800 mg kg −1 body weight for rats), 63 which is classied as a category 1B carcinogen and is subject to restrictions in the European Union. 64urthermore, glyoxal can be produced from biomass-derived sugars, and is seen as a promising crosslinker to realise more sustainable formaldehyde-free wood adhesives. 65,66nother limitation of typical so-templating systems is the use of strong acids or bases as catalysts for the crosslinking reaction of the resins.Ghimbeu et al. 67 elegantly introduced glyoxylic acid with double functionalitythe aldehyde group for crosslinking and the acidic functionality for catalysing the reactionto realise a catalyst-free so-template synthesis.By varying the precursor ratios and the manufacturing process, ordered mesoporous carbons with various architectures could be realised, such as the typical 2D hexagonal p6m and body-centred cubic Im3m mesostructures.Glyoxylic acid is a natural substance that has lower toxicity (oral LD 50 z 2500 mg kg −1 body weight for rats) than formaldehyde.
Furthermore, there has been interest in replacing the fossilfuel derived phloroglucinol by biomass-based alternatives.Herou et al. 68 focused on using hardwood (beech) organosolv lignin for the so-templating method.They used glyoxal as crosslinker without catalyst, by applying the evaporation-induced selfassembly technique in acetone as solvent.The authors noted that lignins with smaller molecular weight and less branched structure could be better for the interaction with the surfactant micelles, favouring the self-assembly process due to their higher mobility.The hardwood lignin that they used had a M w / M n of 3834/2286 g mol −1 , having a low polydispersity index (1.67).In this system, the polypropylene oxide units of Plur-onic® F127 could form the core of the micelles, with the polyethylene oxide segments facing outwards, and interacting with phloroglucinol via hydrogen bonds (see Fig. 6A).The evaporation-induced self-assembly at room temperature was followed by a cross-linking process at 85 °C, and then a carbonisation step (at 900 °C) to obtain the ordered mesoporous carbon scaffold.The authors could replace about half of phloroglucinol to lignin, and still obtained the typical 2Dhexagonal pore structure (p6m) (see Fig. 6B-E).Compared to the system with phloroglucinol only, the addition of lignin gave rise to the development of smaller pores (decreased from 7 nm to 4 nm) with shorter interpore distance (decreased from 12 nm to 9.5 nm), i.e., they obtained a smaller unit cell (compare Fig. 7 (A) Schematic representation of the mechanosynthesis method developed by Castro-Guti érrez et al. 69 The structure in the upper-left corner depicts robinetinidol, a flavanol building unit of condensed mimosa tannins.Bright field TEM images with transversal (left) and longitudinal (right) views on the developed ordered mesoporous carbons prepared at (B) 900 °C and at (C) 1500 °C.Inset shows the corresponding FFT micrographs.(D) (left) N 2 adsorption-desorption results (right) with pore size distribution before (black squares) and after (red dots) CO 2 activation.Reproduced from ref. 69 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 6B and C with Fig. 6D and E).This phenomenon was explained in light of the bulkier structure of lignin, leaving less free volume for the micelles.It is interesting that the authors could not obtain ordered mesoporous carbon when only lignin was used (Fig. 6F and G), thus highlighting the importance for the presence of phloroglucinol that strongly interacts with and self-assembles around the micelles as depicted in Fig. 6A.
One of the greenest methods so far was developed by Castro-Gutiérrez et al., 69 through a mechanosynthesis technique using mimosa tannin as renewable carbon precursor and Pluronic® F127 as structure directing agent in water (see Fig. 7A).The ordered nanoporous carbon was obtained by ball-milling the reactant mixture, yielding a paste-like intermediate which gave the desired material upon carbonisation (at 900 °C).There was no need to use cross-linking agent or catalyst, the mechanosynthesis was performed within a relatively short time (60 min), and direct carbonisation was possible aer the synthesis, making this method an attractive energy-and resource-efficient process.When ordered mesoporous carbon is fabricated from tannins in the conventional way, ethanol and HCl need to be added, and curing is also necessary (100 °C). 70The surfactant/ tannin/water ratio appeared to be crucial to produce the 2D hexagonal mesoporous structure (see Fig. 7B).The authors noted that the mesostructure was retained even at high temperature (up to 1500 °C, see Fig. 7C), leading to an increase in the long-range ordering of the disordered carbon (i.e., higher graphitic crystallite size).CO 2 activation could lead to micropores while maintaining the ordered uniformly sized mesopores (see Fig. 7D), affording a high surface area (around 1900 m 2 g −1 ).Several ordered mesoporous carbon based heterostructures could be also realised through the mechanosynthesis method with tannins, by incorporating Ni nanoparticles, 71 alkaline metal oxides, 72 and Ru nanoparticles. 73In these systems, it was concluded that coordination cross-linking between the avonoid units of tannins and the metal ions facilitated the self-assembly process.
The metal-ion assisted, coordination-induced self-assembly was shown to work with organosolv lignin by Wang et al. 74 They used acetone to dissolve organosolv lignin, Pluronic® F-127 and the metal salt, followed by an evaporation-induced self-assembly step.Curing at 100 °C appeared to be necessary before the carbonisation step that yielded metal nanoparticle/metal oxide doped ordered mesoporous carbons (note that this curing step is not necessary when mechanosynthesis is used, as discussed above).In a similar manner, a range of plant-derived polyphenols (ferulic acid, quercetin, caffeic acid, gallic acid, arbutin, proanthocyanidins) were converted to metal-doped ordered mesoporous carbons using ethanol as solvent. 75The authors concluded that the presence of phenolic hydroxyl group that can form coordination bond with metal ions (see Fig. 8), a good solubility in the solvent for the evaporation-induced selfassembly, and a low molecular weight (preferably less than 5 avonoid units) were conducive to the formation of the ordered mesoporous carbon.
The hydrothermal method is known to produce carbons directly from bio-derived building blocks, such as lignin as well as cellulose and its monomeric unit glucose. 76This strategy has also been explored as a modication of the original so templating technique by adding the Pluronic® F127 to the hydrothermal reaction.7][78] To overcome this problem, Xiao et al. 79  which can undergo a hydrothermal process at much lower temperature (130 °C), using Pluronic® F127 surfactant.The hydrothermal process yielded an ordered cubic Im3m mesostructure with a micelle diameter of about 6 nm, and a carbon wall thickness of about 10 nm.Carbonisation at 550 °C facilitated the removal of the template, leading to a microporous ordered structure that kept the Im3m symmetry.In order to shi the pore size to the mesoporous domain, the authors used trimethylbenzene swelling agent (a petroleum-derived additive).By doing so, they obtained the ordered Im3m structure with bimodal pore size distribution falling in the meso-and micropore domain.

Critical outlook
Lignin has high carbon content, and has already a polyaromatic structure.3][84][85][86][87] In respect to ordered mesoporous carbons, so far, it was shown that in the typical so-templating method, about half of phloroglucinol can be replaced by lignin, 68 and even more when metal ions are added due to the coordination-assisted self-assembly. 74,88It would be interesting to explore whether other types of lignin can be a better t to the so-templating method, to shed light on structural requirements/benets for facilitating the selfassembly.This has already been investigated in detail for plant-derived polyphenols, for the coordination-induced selfassembly approach. 75pplication of the aggressive activating agent KOH is one of the most efficient methods to create micropores, and thus the most popular in the literature; however, this method is not the greenest way to go.There are other methods that could be explored such as the use of harmless reagents: potassium carbonates, bicarbonates, and organic salts. 89Furthermore, bioderived pore forming agents may also be interesting to explore.Thermally label/volatile biosourced compounds, which can be compatible with our system (i.e., solubility, interactions, etc.), can be promising candidates.An interesting example was given by Ra et al.: 90 they used camphor, a small natural organic molecule, as pore forming agent to prepare porous carbon nanobers using polyacrylonitrile precursor.Camphor is a naturally occurring volatile compound with low melting point (around 180 °C).The obtained porous carbon had high micropore volume (around 90% of the total pore volume), with the presence of ultramicropores (pores with diameter below 0.7 nm; around 30% of the micropore volume).High surface area could be achieved (around 880 m 2 g −1 ), without the necessity of additional activation steps, which is advantageous for the energy efficiency of the process.Some biopolymers can also be good sacricial pore forming agents, as it was demonstrated recently on high amylose starch. 91,92High amylose starch has a melting point around 280 °C, and starts decomposing soon aer it melts from about 300 °C. 91When blended with polyacrylonitrile for the preparation of porous carbon nanobers, a specic surface area as high as ∼1200 m 2 g −1 could be reached with micro-mesoporous hierarchical structure. 92Albeit the mentioned biosourced porogens were applied in different systems (not for templating methods), these approaches may give some inspirations to discover this research direction.Although considered less efficient, physical activation methods using e.g., steam or CO 2 are also more benign strategies compared to KOH-activation.
Characterising the carbon structure and surface chemistry is very important for applications, nevertheless, this has mostly been neglected at some extent thus far amongst the studies focusing on green so-templating strategies.Not only the porosity, but carbon structure and surface chemistry also have crucial inuence on the performance and characteristics of the porous carbons.For example, in electrochemical applications, the graphitic carbon structure will determine the conductivity of the structure, and the surface chemistry will be important for wettability with the electrolyte, and will determine the presence/ absence of pseudocapacitive or parasitic redox reactions.Thus, it would be important to know the surface chemistry and carbon structure of the fabricated micro-and mesoporous biobased carbons.It can be expected that the temperature, the activation process, and the nature of the biosourced precursor together with other additives and processing conditions will shape these properties.
Green methods for doping the created biobased ordered mesoporous carbon structures with heteroatoms, such as N, S, P, etc., have not been investigated in much detail so far, and it should be an interesting direction for future research.
We believe that one of the major limitations of the sotemplating method, which has not been addressed so far, is the use of Pluronic® surfactants, which are inherently petroleumderived components in the system.As we have discussed above, the so-templating system is very sensitive, and many requirements need to be met for the creation of the ordered nanoporous structure.Nevertheless, there may be more sustainable, bio-derived surfactants that can replace these components in the future.

Conclusions
Nanoarchitecturing biobased porous carbons is paramount for competing with high-performing, state-of-the-art petroleumderived nanoporous carbons, including meso-microporous hierarchically structured architectures.In doing so, methodologies to prepare such architectures must be revisited to arrive at a safe and sustainable-by-design product.Based on our critical overview on existing methods, the so-templating approach appears to be the greenest way developed so far.Several modi-cations enabled the realisation of more benign so-templating processes (e.g., benign crosslinkers, catalyst-free synthesis), together with the application of biosourced carbon precursors.Modied so-templating methods, including the mechanochemical synthesis, coordination-assisted self-assembly techniques, and hydrothermal approaches are major achievements in this eld.Nevertheless, there is still much to be done, for example to replace the petroleum-based surfactants, one of the biggest challenges to tackle thus far.The principles of green chemistry could be more thoroughly implemented when developing carbon nanoarchitectures in the future.

László
Szabó received his PhD in 2016 in Chemical Sciences (Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary).He was a Postdoctoral Fellow between 2017 and 2020 in Kanazawa University, and then an ICYS Research Fellow from 2020 to 2022 at the National Institute for Materials Science in Japan.He received a Marie-Curie Fellowship in 2022, and joined the group of Professor Veerle Vandeginste (KU Leuven, Belgium), resulting in this tutorial mini-review.He is now a tenured Senior Researcher at the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (Japan).His broad scientic interest lies in benign-by-design, environmentally more friendly materials, and processes.Wim Thielemans received his PhD in Chemical Engineering from the University of Delaware (USA) in 2004.Aer an MSCA Fellowship at the Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble (France), he started as a Lecturer in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering at the University of Nottingham (UK) in 2006.Aer being promoted to Associate Professor, Wim moved to KU Leuven in 2013 where he is now a Full Professor and leads the Sustainable Materials Lab working on renewable materials and recycling strategy developments.Wim is currently Chair of the ACS Cellulose and Renewable Materials division and sits on the KU Leuven Research Council.Jin Won Seo graduated from RWTH Aachen and received her PhD in solid state physics at RWTH Aachen and Research Centre Jülich in Germany.She worked at the Electron Microscopy Center EMAT of University of Antwerp in Belgium, at the IBM Zurich Research Laboratory and at the Institute of Physics of Complex Matter IPMC at EPFL in Switzerland.Since 2007, she has been Professor at the Department of Materials Engineering (MTM) of KU Leuven in Belgium.Her research interest focuses on the synthesis, functionalization and application of nanoscale materials, mainly carbonbased nanomaterials and transition metal oxides, as well as on nanoscale characterization, especially by means of electron microscopy.Dionysios D. Dionysiou is currently a Herman Schneider Professor of Environmental Engineering and Distinguished Research Professor (STEM) at the University of Cincinnati.He has served as a UNESCO co-Chair Professor on "Water Access and Sustainability".Professor Dionysiou is leading several projects of local, state, national and international importance focused on water quality, treatment, reuse, and monitoring.His expertise and research interests include (i) physical chemical processes for water treatment and water reuse, (ii) advanced oxidation processes, including UV and solar light-based remediation processes, (iii) treatment of contaminants of emerging concern; (iv) remediation of harmful algal blooms/cyanotoxins, (v) environmental nanotechnology, environmental catalysis, and nanosensing, and (vi) waterenergy-food (WEF) nexus and water sustainability.

Frank
Buysschaert obtained his PhD degree at the Faculty of Engineering and the Environment of the University of Southampton (UK) in 2015.He worked as a researcher at the Belgian Royal Military Academy and the Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium, performing research related to helicopters and fuel cells.In 2019, he joined KU Leuven as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering (TME division) with focus on hybrid propulsion systems for aircra and drones.Veerle Vandeginste obtained her PhD degree in Geology in 2006 at KU Leuven, Belgium.She worked as a Research Fellow at the Department of Earth Science and Engineering at Imperial College London, UK.In 2015, she was appointed as an Assistant Professor in the School of Chemistry at the University of Nottingham, UK.Since 2020, she is an Associate Professor in the Department of Materials Engineering at KU Leuven.Her research combines sustainability and functionality of materials, focusing on the physicochemical interactions at interfaces in materials for energy storage and conversion devices, advanced coatings, and medical devices.
Fig.2 (A and B) Hierarchically designed pore network to achieve efficient mass transfer following Murray's law.26 (C) A method to prepare hierarchically porous Se-doped carbon as cathode for Li-Se batteries.(D and E) SEM and (F) TEM images of the prepared hierarchically porous material.Reproduced from ref. 23.Copyright 2022 Elsevier.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (A) A common soft-templating system to prepare highly ordered mesoporous carbons, and then micropores on their wall via KOH activation.(B) N 2 adsorption-desorption isotherms before (C2) and after the KOH activation step (C2-700) (inset shows the pore size distribution derived from these isotherms).Reproduced from ref. 32 with slight modification.Copyright 2008 Elsevier.

Fig. 6 (
Fig. 6 (A) Schematic representation of the self-assembly process together with the processing steps to obtain ordered mesoporous carbon using lignin-phloroglucinol carbon precursors.TEM images recorded on the material after the carbonisation process, obtained using (B and C) phloroglucinol only, (D and E) phloroglucinol-lignin and (F and G) only lignin precursors.Inset shows a (B) zoomed-in image with unit cell, and (C and D) FFT micrographs.The scalebar is 100 nm for (B), (D) and (F), and 10 nm for (C), (E) and (G).Reproduced from ref. 68 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Fig. 8
Fig. 8 Schematic representation of the metal-ion assisted coordination-induced self-assembly approach yielding metal-doped ordered mesoporous carbons using plant-derived polyphenols.Reproduced from ref. 75 with some modifications.In the upper part caffeic acid is depicted as it coordinates with a metal ion.Copyright 2023 Elsevier.